|
| |
Theistic Psychology:
The Scientific Knowledge of God
Extracted from the Correspondential sense
of Sacred Scripture

Dr. Leon James
Professor of Psychology
University of Hawaii
Published on the Web in 2004
Last updated: 2007
About the Author
|| See the Layers Diagram
For Permissions Note and
Conditions of Use see
Volume 18
The Topical Index to Sections
and Reading List is in Volume 18
This is Volume 1
Introduction to Theistic
Psychology
( version 63i )
1.0 The
Psychology of God: Overview of Basic Topics
1.0.1 Topic 1. The Negative
Bias in Science
vs. The Positive Bias in Science
1.0.1.1
Substantive Dualism:
We are Born Dual Citizens
1.0.1.2
Theism in
Theistic Science: Universe Created and Managed by God
1.0.1.2.1
Born Into Eternity
1.0.1.2.2
Male Mind, Female Mind, and Conjoint Mind
1.0.1.2.2.1
The Mental Origin of Semen
Study Questions: 1.0 to 1.0.1.2.2
(Report 1)
1.0.1.3
Revelation:
Divine Speech Exteriorizing as Sacred Scripture
1.0.1.3.1
What are Spiritual Temptations
1.0.2
Topic 2: The Spiritual World of Eternity
1.0.3
Topic 3: Divine Speech, Sacred Scripture, and Conjunction
With God
1.0.3.1
Part A: The
Psychobiology of Conjunction with the Divine Human
1.0.3.2
Part B: Degrees of
Conjunction with God
1.0.3.3
Part C: Why This Is a
Perfect World Despite Evil
1.0.4
Topic 4: Forms of Divine Speech in Our Conscious Natural
Mind
1.0.5
Topic 5: Sensuous vs. Rational Spirituality
1.0.5.1
Part A: Why Doesn't God Make an
Appearance
at the United Nations?
1.0.5.2
Part B (i): Sensuous
Consciousness of God
Does Not Remain in the Afterlife
Part B (ii): What
About the Paranormal, Miracles,
Telepathy, Magic?
1.0.5.3
Part C: We are Dual Citizens in Discrete
Layers
1.0.5.4
Part D: There is Only One Mental World
in the Human Race
1.0.5.5
The Daily Discipline of Rational
Spirituality
1.0.5.5.1
Recognizing Our Dual Existence
1.0.5.5.2
The Mental World is the World of Eternity
1.0.5.5.3
Our Life in Eternity
1.0.5.5.4
Why We Need Sacred Scripture
1.0.5.5.5
The Hidden Correspondential Sense of Sacred
Scripture
1.0.5.5.6
Why We Need Theistic Psychology
1.0.5.5.7
The New Evolution in Rational Consciousness
of God
1.0.6
The Negative and Positive Bias in Science
1.0.7.
What is Substantive Dualism in Science
Study Questions: 1.0.1.3 to 1.0.7
(Report 2)
1.1
Three Levels of
Thinking About God
1.1.1
Level 1: Materialistic Science (Monism,
Negative Bias)
1.1.2
Level 2: Mystical Religion
1.1.3
Level 3: Theistic Psychology
1.1.4
Ten Rational Conclusions Derived From
the Proposition That
God Exists
(A) First Conclusion: God
is a Person, at once Divine and Human
(B) Second Conclusion:
God’s Omnipotence Must Control Every Event
(C) Third Conclusion: God
is Perfect in Love and Rationality
(D) Fourth Conclusion:
There are Two Worlds, One in Time-Space,
the Other in Eternity
(E) Fifth Conclusion:
Humans are Born Dual Citizens, In Time and
in Eternity
(F) Sixth Conclusion: The
Eternity of the Afterlife is Our Mental World Now
(G) Seventh Conclusion:
We Are Born With Heaven and Hell in Our Mind
(H) Eighth Conclusion:
Heaven is a State of Marriage Between Soul Mates
(I) Ninth Conclusion:
Divine Speech as Sacred Scripture Produces
Consciousness and Enlightenment
(J) Tenth Conclusion:
Salvation, Liberation, Peace, and Wisdom Are
Attained By Spiritual Discipline
1.1.4.1
How the Idea of God Makes Us Immortal
1.1.4.1.1 The
Incarnation Event: God Enters the World
of History and Science
1.1.4.1.1.1
Completion of the Creation of the Human Race
1.1.4.1.1.2
A Brief History of God and Humanity
1.1.4.2
The Three Benefits of Rational Spirituality:
Enlightenment, Empowerment, Rational Ecstasy
1.1.4.2.1
Spiritual Enlightenment
1.1.4.2.2
Spiritual Empowerment
1.1.4.2.3
Rational Ecstasy
1.1.4.3
How Divine Speech Descends In the Human Mind Through
Discrete Layers and Keeps It Functioning
1.1.4.3.1
Conceptual Charts of the Physiology of God
and the Human Mind
Study Questions: 1.1 to 1.1.4.3.1
(Report 3)
1.1.4.3.2
Extracting the Content of Divine Speech
Through Correspondences
1.1.4.3.2.1
What are Correspondences in Sacred
Scripture?
1.1.4.3.2.2
Drinking Blood and Other Examples of
Correspondences
in Sacred Scripture
1.1.4.3.2.3 Metaphors, Symbolism, Simile, Figurative
Speech -- Are Not
Correspondences
1.1.4.3.3
Three Levels of Thinking About God: Energy,
Person, Truth From Good
1.2
Mystical vs. Rational Approaches to Theistic Psychology
1.2.1
Who was Swedenborg?
1.2.1.1
Swedenborg's Autobiographical Letters
1.3
Rational Substantive
Dualism
1.3.1
Substantive Dualism and Theism in Science
1.3.1.2 The
Psychology of Religion in Nontheistic Psychology
1.3.2
Discrete Layers
of Substances
1.3.3
The Substances
of the Mental Organs
1.3.4
God's Mental Substances as
the Framework of the Universe
1.3.5
Benefits of
Understanding Theistic Psychology
1.4
Partial List of Scientific Revelations in the Writings
of Swedenborg
1.5
Some of the People Who Have Acknowledged
Swedenborg
Study Questions: 1.1.4.3.2 to 1.5
(Report 4)
1.5.1
Students Speak Out on Swedenborg
1.5.1.1
The Swedenborg Reports
1.5.1.2
The Negative Bias
in Science
1.5.1.3
Outline of Swedenborg's Spiritual Psychology
1.6
Spiritual
Psychobiology
1.6.1
Three Levels of Behavior
1.6.2
Swedenborg's Laws of the Spiritual World
1.6.3
Criteria for a Scientific
Theory in Psychology
1.6.3.1 Organicity
1.6.3.2. Objective
Reality
1.6.3.3.
Operational Definition
1.6.3.4. Empiricism
1.6.3.5. Usefulness
1.6.4
The
Organic Basis of All Phenomena
1.6.5
The Method of Psycho-Biological
Correspondence
1.6.6
Applications of Swedenborg's System
1.6.7
Behavioral Consequences of Swedenborg's
System
1.6.7.1 The Anatomical Layers of the Mind
1.6.8
Sacred Scripture as the Source of Scientific Revelations
1.6.8.1
Thinking from Scientific Revelation
1.6.9
History of the
Concept of Dualism in Science
1.6.9.1
Substantive Dualism
1.6.9.2
Prior Versions of Dualism in the Negative
bias in science
1.6.9.3
Dualism and Consciousness
1.6.9.4
Dualism in Descartes and Swedenborg
1.7 Swedenborg's Description of How We Are Resuscitated
After Death
Study Questions: 1.5.1 to 1.7 (Report 5)
1.8
The Rationale For Theistic
Psychology as Science
1.8.1
The "Bible Code" vs. the Method
of Correspondences With Enlightenment
1.8.1.1
Horizontal vs. Vertical Extraction
1.8.2
Divine Speech and Its
Functional Properties
1.8.3
The Content of Divine Speech
1.8.4
The Three Methodologies in
Theistic Psychology --
Extractive, Predictive, and
Applied
1.8.4.1
Levels of Extractive
Research
1.8.4.2 What
is God Talking to Us About?
1.8.5
Why Study Theistic
Psychology?
1.8.6
About Swedenborg
1.8.7
Should One Believe
Swedenborg?
1.8.8
Scientific Proof that
Sacred Scripture is Divine
1.8.8.1
The Secret Presence of Correspondences in Sacred
Scripture
1.8.8.2
Cause-Effect
Control by God
1.8.8.2.1
The Correspondential Sense of CL 270
1.8.8.2.2
The Correspondential Sense of CL 42
1.8.8.2.2.1
The Power of the Literal Sense
that Contains the Correspondential Sense
1.8.8.2.3
The Correspondential Sense of Pharaoh's
Dream
1.8.8.2.4
The Correspondential Sense of DP 30
1.8.8.3
Correspondences
in Our Thinking and Language
1.8.8.4
Daily Life Correspondences of Body Parts, Actions, and Functions
1.8.8.5
Numbers in Sacred Scripture
1.8.8.6
Types of People in Sacred Scripture
1.8.8.7
Geographic Terms in Sacred Scripture
1.8.8.8
Animals in Sacred Scripture
1.8.8.9
The Divine Origin and Power of Correspondences
1.8.8.10 The Scientific Status of Correspondences
1.8.8.11 Perception of The correspondential sense of
Scientific Revelations
1.8.8.12 Natural vs. Spiritual Understanding of
Correspondences
1.8.8.13 True Science -- Divine Scientific
Revelations of Absolute Truth
1.8.9
Theistic Science: The Scientific Alternative
to Creationism and Intelligent Design
1.8.9.1 Recent Court Decision in Pennsylvania on Teaching Religion in
the Public School
Curriculum
1.8.9.2
God in Science vs.
God in Religion
Study Questions 1,8,9, 2.12, 2.17 plus 6.4 to 6.8 (Report 6)
(optional)
1.9
Life in the Mental World of Eternity
See also: Lecture Notes for
Studying Theistic Psychology at:
www.soc.hawaii.edu/leonj/theistic/mental-anatomy.htm
Note: The layers of the mind frequently
mentioned in this volume can be viewed and printed here:
www.soc.hawaii.edu/leonj/theistic/mental-anatomy.htm#chart-layers
Note: Quotations from the Writings of
Swedenborg are given with parenthetical notes in italics that I insert in square
brackets throughout the quoted text. These do not appear in the original. As
well, longer paragraphs are arbitrarily sub-divided in smaller paragraphs. For
the original text of Swedenborg's Writings please consult the online copies
available at : ||
www.heavenlydoctrines.org ||
http://www.smallcanonsearch.com/ ||
http://biblemeanings.info/ ||
www.e-swedenborg.com/writings/booklist.htm ||
http://www.swedenborgproject.org/
Section
1.0 The Psychology of God -- Overview of Basic Topics
Theistic psychology is the scientific study of God as revealed in the
correspondential sense of Sacred
Scripture. Sacred Scripture is Divine Speech
that descends through the discrete layers of the human mind -- spiritual mind,
rational mind, and natural mind. (See the
Layers Diagram). The content or meaning of Divine Speech
itself is
infinite and incomprehensible to human beings who have finite minds. However,
the human mind is constructed as a biological receptor organ for receiving spiritual heat
and spiritual light substances that exist eternally in the mental world of the
human race. These spiritual substances are not material in nature, like matter
or energy in time
and space, or like natural light and heat from the physical sun or star.
Instead, spiritual
heat and light substances stream out from the Spiritual Sun, which is not in the physical world
of time but in the spiritual world of eternity.
The spiritual world of eternity is the world that is not in time and space.
It cannot be detected by physical measuring instruments designed to detect
physical matter or energy only, and nothing else.
If you hold off with the negative bias in science, which requires
physical measurement, you can use your mental
observation ability to empirically observe the existence and reality of the
world of eternity. Eternity is always, so it must also be now, right? Our
observational experience of
eternity now is through our mental life -- which is very very familiar to
every human being! Hence eternity is already familiar to everybody. It is not
something new or unknown. It is even more familiar to us than the world of
time and physical matter.
Most people and scientists today
believe that our mental life is in the brain, which is physical in time. Hence
this would mean that our mental life is physical. This theory or principle is
known as reductionism in science. In other words, the mental of
eternity gets reduced to the chemical world of neurons in the physical brain.
According to this theoretical reductionism, mental life or consciousness of
self and world, is said not to really exist. Only the electro-chemical action
of the brain is really real. But
this hypothesis is incorrect, as is fully proven in theistic psychology.
The reality
is that our mental life is not in this world but in the mental world. Our
sensations, thoughts, and feelings are not physical operations but mental.
Mental operations are not measurable physically since they are not in the
physical world. When we are born we are born into eternity and each of us is immortal.
For awhile we are dual citizens, living in two worlds simultaneously that are precisely
interconnected by cause-effect laws of correspondences (to be explained later). We have temporary
membership in a horizontal community in time on earth through a
physical body. We also have permanent membership in a vertical community in
eternity in the mental world of humanity.
We live our temporary existence in the
physical body on earth, and this is tied to our immortal existence in the spiritual body in
eternity. For instance, as you are reading this, your physical senses and
brain, control your eye movements, as well as the analysis of the linguistic
information in each word, sentence, and paragraph. So now the brain has
translated the visual information into a neural pattern of electro-chemical
firings. That's it. That's as far as the brain can go. The brain is
physical in time-space, but the meaning of the sentences is not physical, but
mental.
This is worth repeating: the words on the
screen or page are physical, but their meaning is mental. Nothing of the
mental can exist in the physical. These two are separate in existence, but
tied in function. Your physical body in time-space is tied by function to your
mental body in eternity. The two must work together until your death. This
means separation from the physical world of time and space. Without a physical
body, the mental body now is free in its own existence. This is the afterlife
of eternity. It never ends. What life is like in eternity will be discussed.
The conscious mental life we now have is
only a potion of our mental life. This portion is called the natural mind. But
we also have a spiritual mind. We become conscious in this spiritual mind when
we die. Once we are conscious in the spiritual mind we can see everybody else
who is already in that mental state. This is how people can meet friends and
family that had passed on before them. The process of dying is actually called
resuscitation. Approximately 30 hours after death of the physical body, we
awaken in full consciousness in our spiritual mind, and this continues
forever. These facts were observed many times in detail by Swedenborg who is
the first and only modern scientist in the history of science who was able to
be conscious in his spiritual mind several years prior to his death. Theistic
psychology is based on the laws of correspondences that Swedenborg observed by
living in both worlds simultaneously for 27 years. These are the same
correspondences in which Sacred Scripture is written.
For a brief biography of Swedenborg and his place in the world today, see this
interview:
Williams-Hogan, Jane K. (2006). From Swedenborg to the New Church: Interview.
Religioscope. Available at:
http://religion.info/english/interviews/article_247.shtml So if our science is going to be
logical and rational we are going to acknowledge the full and
independent existence of the mental world of humanity, which is outside the physical
world of time-space-matter, and not part of it. This other world that is not
in time or space is called the mental world of eternity. You are extremely
familiar with the mental world of eternity. You are in it every minute of the
day. You are in it right now. And so
am I. And so is everyone you know, and every human being -- by definition. But
our conscious awareness only extends to the natural part of the mental world.
We are conscious of whatever comes to us through the senses and the brain. So
we appear to ourselves subjectively to live entirely in that world which is
made of ideas based on the physical senses. So all of our conscious mental
life is filled with ideas from the natural world -- tastes, smells, objects,
environment, cities, ocean, sky, moon, etc. Our ideas based on these objects
make up our conscious meanings and understandings, so much so, that we are
able to deny that there is a mental world that is not made of these natural
objects. But once we are resuscitated, a few
hours after death, we are conscious in our spiritual mind which has sensory
organs of its own that are capable of detecting spiritual things, mental
things. So we can actually see others who are also in the spiritual mind, and
we can talk and have relationships just like we do now. In order to interact
with each other in the mental world of eternity people project what they have
with them from the natural mind. People's thoughts and feelings create the
surrounding environment, just as they do in dreams. What you dream about and
what happens depends on your feelings, emotions, and memories. This is what
also happens in the afterlife of eternity, which is the mental world of which
we are unconscious while we are still tied to the physical body. The
moment we are born we start our immortal life through the spiritual or mental body in
eternity. Whatever we do all day long we have sensations, thoughts, and
feelings. These are actual operations in our mental organs located in our
spiritual body in eternity. In theistic psychology the spiritual body is called the mental
body, and the spiritual world is called the mental world of eternity. Note
also that the spiritual world is called by many people the afterlife. They do
not realize that the afterlife is the mental world of eternity. How? Because
our spiritual or mental body grows from birth to adulthood along with our
physical body. But then our physical body begins to age while the mental body
does not age. How? Because the mental body is made of spiritual substances
from the Spiritual Sun (heat and light), as stated above, and the physical body is made of the
material substances from the physical sun. All things physical are temporary
and subject to aging laws, while all things spiritual or mental are permanent,
immortal. So in order to understand how there
can be a science of God, or a science of immortality and eternity, you need to
construct in your understanding the concept of "substantive dualism," as will
be explained. Substantive dualism contrasts with materialistic monism, which
denies -- without proving -- the existence or reality of God, eternity, or the
mental world. Since no scientific proof is given for this denial, it is called
the negative bias in science. The reason it is called a "bias"
is because it does not prove the denial, just makes the assertion. And the
reason it is called "negative" is because its methodology consists of denying the existence of a phenomenon that
cannot been proven
by physical measurement. So you can
see that it is not rational to want to prove the reality of phenomena in
eternity through physical measurements. This
is irrational and contrary to logic.
Physical measurements apply only to
physical phenomena, never to mental phenomena. It is irrational to think that
sensations, thoughts, and feelings can be measured by physical measurements.
Only brain activity can be measured by physical measures. Mental activity
cannot be measured by physical measures. As a result materialistic psychology
finds itself denying the reality of people's sensations, thoughts and
feelings. Since you have been schooled in the negative bias in science, you
are probably thinking right now that your thoughts and feelings are your brain
neurons firing electrical and chemical matter. Right?
Historically this view is called reductionism in psychology. It reduces
the existence of mental operations -- sensations, thoughts and feelings -- to
electrical and chemical robotonics. Neuroscience of the brain has therefore
become biological robotonics. The human part, which is the mental part, has
been eliminated. Here is how reductionism is practiced today in science and
technology presentations:
From:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/technology/technology.html?in_article_id=434968&in_page_id=1766&ito=1490
What's on your mind? A machine can tell us
by Fiona Macrae -
9th February 2007
It is the stuff of science fiction - a
gizmo capable of reading people's minds, revealing their most private
thoughts.
Now, that fiction has become reality with
scientists devising a way to accurately predict what someone is going
to do.
Using sophisticated scanners and computer
programmes, they have worked out how the brain lights up when making
different plans - a breakthrough that effectively allows the reading
of people's minds.
Still in its infancy, the technique could
one day be used to ease the lives of the paralysed by giving them
better control over the movement of prosthetic limbs.
It could also be used to enable people to
operate computers and PlayStations by thought alone and, echoing the
plot of the film Minority Report, even allow police to arrest
criminals before they break the law.
Professor John-Dylan Haynes (CORR), who
started the research while working at University College London, said:
"Until now, no one has been able to show whether it might be possible
to read a persons' intentions from their brain activity.
"We wanted to know if you could read
intentions while they were still covert - known only to the subject."
To find out if this was possible, the
scientists asked a group of volunteers to prepare to do some mental
arithmetic.
The eight men and women were told to
choose to perform an addition or subtraction - but not to tell the
scientists their choice.
While they were thinking about whether to
add or subtract, but had not started to do any sums, their brains were
scanned using a high-tech version of the MRI scanners used every day
in our hospitals to detect brain tumours.
After a few seconds, the volunteers were
the numbers needed for the calculations and their brains were scanned
again while they added or subtracted and came up with an answer.
Comparison of the scans revealed that
different clusters of brain cells are involved in thinking about doing
something and actually doing it.
When we think about something, cells
towards the very front of the brain light up.
However, when we actually start to act on
our plans - for instance by doing a mental calculation - the activity
shifts slightly further back.
Crucially, the scans also showed that
different brain cells are involved in thinking about doing different
things.
With the help of a complex computer
programme, the scientists were able to pinpoint the pattern of brain
cells that light up when we're thinking about adding up and cells that
come to life when we're planning to subtract.
Using these patterns, they were able to
work out whether the person would add or subtract the numbers - and
get it right more than 70 per cent of the time, the journal Current
Biology reports.
Prof Haynes, who completed the research
after moving to the Max Planck Institute in Germany says the
breakthrough could one day lead to the creation of a mind-reading
machine small enough to fit inside a baseball cap.
He said: "We know that information is
there and now we have to find novel, smaller, cheaper devices.
"It is imperative we develop these
machines because we know there is something in the brain we can really
put to use.
"A brain scanner in a baseball cap would
be the perfect version."
Such technology would, however, bring with
it a host of ethical issues, with people being concerned about their
deepest secrets being made public.
From:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/technology/technology.html?in_article_id=434968&in_page_id=1766&ito=1490
Exercise:
Reread the science news story and see if you can find the reductionistic
fallacy in it.
Hint:
Contrast what actually is measured (brain waves) and what thoughts the person
is thinking (general inference about readiness to act vs. specific information
on thoughts or feelings). Note also how the comments of the readers involve
the reductionist fallacy. The scientific thinking on
dualism is now changing through theistic psychology. The dual world of
physical time and mental eternity is being introduced in psychology through
the positive bias in science. It is called "bias" because it does not prove by
physical measurement the existence of God and the afterlife. Let's face it:
neither the negative bias in science (i.e., denying God's scientific
reality), nor the positive bias in science (i.e., affirming the scientific
reality of God) , can be proven by physical measurements.
Once we enter the approach in psychology
called substantive dualism in science, we begin to employ the
techniques and methodology developed in the positive bias science. God is
assumed to be real and so is Sacred Scripture as Divine Speech. From these two
-- God's reality and Sacred Scripture as Divine Speech -- we derive an
effective and valid methodology for the scientific investigation of God.
Divine Speech issues from God's thoughts and feelings in a similar way that
human speech issues from our thoughts and feelings. Remember that in this
methodology all mental phenomena are also real, but not in time, and not
involving physical matter. What then?
Spiritual substances from the Spiritual Sun. Or: Mental substances from the
Spiritual Sun. Sensations, thoughts, and feelings are operations of our
sensorimotor, cognitive, and affective organs in the spiritual body. Right
now, in this very instant, your visual sensations from reading this are not in
the brain but in your sensorimotor organ located in your mental body, which is
located in eternity, since your birth. You do all your sensing, thinking, and
feeling in that mental body or spiritual body born in eternity and connected
by correspondence to your physical body. God, being the Divine Human from
eternity, in whom infinite things make one, employs His affective, cognitive,
and sensorimotor organs to create the dual universe from the substances in
Himself.
What are these substances (raw materials)
that come out of God's affective, cognitive, and sensorimotor organs?
You already know the answer: when Swedenborg be became conscious of his
highest affective organ (called the celestial mind), he saw other people who
were also there, living as immortals in a spiritual or mental paradise in
eternity. You too, every human being, can raise your existence to higher and
higher levels in your mind, until you exist in your celestial mind in
eternity. Everyone there, including Swedenborg, was able to see visually the
Spiritual Sun shining in the mental sky oh eternal conjugial heaven. And
amidst the Spiritual Sun -- which was exceedingly bright yet did not blind the
eye -- we can see the Divine Human Himself. This is the final proof that a
rational person needs in order to be one hundred percent certain of God's
reality. In our highest mental organs we can
visually see spiritual light and heat pouring out of the Spiritual Sun. These
spiritual substances streaming out of the Spiritual Sun create an atmosphere
we can call mental ether. We know this about the natural sun from which
this planet originates, which is a middle sized star among billions of other
stars in our galaxy. Each star creates a gravitational field or space of
physical ether, in a way that corresponds to the Spiritual Sun, which creates
a mental ether out of the substances issuing from God's affective and
cognitive organs. But what is spiritual heat?
The word "heat" is commonly used in materialistic science, as you know from
physics, chemistry, or meteorology. And in medicine the word "temperature" is
used for measuring body heat. In this natural sense "heat" is physical, as is
temperature and motion. But "spiritual heat" is not physical. It is mental.
Since God is omnipotent and loving, whatever issues from His affective organ
is called Divine Good or Divine Love (these two mean the same spiritually).
So spiritual heat is love substance (or good as substance), and
spiritual light is truth substance (or rationality as substance).
Reread the last bolded sentence: it is the central key to unlock your
comprehension of theistic psychology and substantive dualism in science.
Spiritual substance in the mental world of eternity refers to
the spiritual light and heat streaming from the Spiritual Sun and permeating
the totality of the mental world, just as physical substance or
matter refers to the light and heat streaming from the physical sun
and permeating all space and planets. Every object in the physical world is
made of physical substances (chemical elements) from the natural sun, just as
every object in the mental world is made of spiritual substances (good and
truth in infinite variety) from the Spiritual Sun. The Spiritual Sun is the
visible aura that appears brightly around the head of God Divine Human. This
Spiritual Sun surrounding God's head was seen many times by Swedenborg when he
was made conscious in the upper heavenly layers of his mind (see
the Layers Diagram). All the
people who lived in that layer of the mental world were also able to see God
and the surrounding Spiritual Sun. So the spiritual goods and truths that
issue from God's Mind appear to human beings visually as a Spiritual Sun. You
too will see this Spiritual Sun that surrounds God the Divine Human, when you
ascend to your heavenly layers after the second death (see Section xx).
You can see now that God the Divine Human did not create the dual universe out
of nothing (a non-scientific notion), but out of Divine Speech, that is, out
of substances of good and substances of truth issuing from God's affective and
cognitive organs of His Divine Human Mind.. As you already know we are
born into eternity with our spiritual body or mind. The substances out of
which our mental organs are constructed are the substances that issue from the
Spiritual Sun in endless variety. Every newborn is unique even though it is
constructed out of spiritual heat and light from the Spiritual Sun. Every
newborn's mental body (or "spiritual body") contains a sensorimotor organ, a cognitive organ, and an
affective organ (see Section xx). These organs are arranged in several levels called discrete
degrees (see Section xx). The highest level of operation of our affective and cognitive organs
is called the celestial-rational mind. A discrete degree below this we have
affective and cognitive organs at an intermediate level of excellence called
the spiritual-rational mind. And at the lowest discrete level of operations of
the affective and cognitive organs, we have the natural-rational and
natural-sensuous mind. Every human being possesses these same three levels and
organs. Note this very important observation:
it seems to us that we are in a private world by ourselves when we are
thinking and experiencing feelings. Right? But this is an appearance or
illusion. Theistic psychology shows that the human race has only one mental
world, only one spiritual world of the afterlife. Everyone is born into the
same mental world of eternity that is created around the Spiritual Sun by the
substances of good and truth. And everyone wakes up after death in the same
afterlife of eternity. Thus there is only one mental world.
Once a human being is born into the
immortality of eternity, the mental organs function as receptor organs for the
spiritual heat -- into the affective organ, and for spiritual light -- into
the cognitive organ. In other words, spiritual heat or good in substance,
constructs the affective organ at birth, and then keeps it alive and operating
by the continuous or ceaseless inflow of spiritual heat or good in substance.
The same for the cognitive organ and spiritual light or truth substance.
Now you can see that Divine Speech from God's mind issues into the mental
world of humanity and enters every mental organ of every human being, at the
top of the mind called the celestial level of affective and cognitive organs.
Of course we are not conscious of the celestial and spiritual mind while we
are conscious in our natural mind, and tied to the physical body by
correspondence. However, even though we are not conscious of these mental
operations triggered by the inflow of good and truth substances into our
celestial-spiritual mind, nevertheless we are influenced by it in our
conscious natural mind through the laws of correspondences, as will be
made clear later. When Divine Speech,
containing good and truth substances, descends to the natural mind of a chosen
prophet prepared by God for this purpose, he is able to write it down in a
natural language, and what he writes down is called Sacred Scripture. Note
carefully that other people are not conscious of this Divine Speech, though it
is also present in their mind, not just in the mind of the prophet. It's just
that the prophet is given limited temporary consciousness in the spiritual
mind and in the natural mind, long enough to be able to write it down in a
natural language. Note also that the prophet is not aware that the
sentences he writes down are only correspondences to Divine Speech in his
mind.
It's only since the Writings Sacred
Scripture were provided through Swedenborg that science can now know about the
hidden correspondences in Sacred Scripture.
Sacred Scripture
is the method used in theistic psychology to discover the hidden
layers of information contained in Divine Speech. These hidden layers were not
available to scientific study until the 18th century author Emanuel Swedenborg
(1688-1772) discovered the laws of correspondences that govern the joint
operation of natural phenomena in time (Sacred Scripture written down in a
natural language), and spiritual phenomena in eternity (Divine Speech entering
the celestial mind).
This relationship in theistic psychology is called substantive dualism in
science. Swedenborg discovered that there is only one mental world for the
human race, and this human mental world is the afterlife of eternity.
We are born into eternity as dual citizens,
the physical body being in the natural world and the mental body, or mind,
being in the afterlife world of eternity. Swedenborg discovered that every
person undergoes a mental resuscitation process about 30 hours after
separation from the physical connection through death. We then exist
consciously in our spiritual mind, which until resuscitation, was operative
but unconscious. Shortly after resuscitation, the natural mind becomes
unconscious.
Swedenborg also discovered that there was a
functional connection between every verse in Sacred Scripture with a
particular type of mental state in the human race. He was thus able to
empirically map out the correspondences between the words and phrases of
Sacred Scripture with mental states. By using the functional connection
between the body organs and the mental organs, Swedenborg demonstrated that
Sacred Scripture has layers of meaning expressed in correspondences. Knowledge
of these correspondences allows us to extract the scientific facts and
principles about God that are hidden within the literal sense of Sacred
Scripture. See the
Layers Diagram. When the hidden layers of meaning
in Sacred Scripture are accessed through the correspondences that have been
revealed, we discover what God wants to talk to us
about, what information God wants us to know. The results so far, amply
demonstrated in the Writings of Swedenborg, show that God wants to talk to humanity about
Himself in relation to us. God wants to instruct us concerning mental anatomy,
theistic psychology, and how He manages the universe and why.
Theistic psychology is the psychology of
God.
As psychologists we have two approaches to
investigating the psychology of God. One way is to define God as a belief,
and then investigating what people believe in. In non-theistic negative bias
psychology this methodology is known as the "psychology of religion." You
can see logically that this is not an investigation of God but an
investigation of what people believe. Since God is not a scientific
concept or reality in non-theistic psychology, it is only possible to
investigate people's beliefs and attitudes and behaviors, but not God. The other approach is to define God as a reality in itself, not just a belief
or fantasy. Investigating God is logically possible only if you assume that
God could be a reality. Then you can investigate it is, or is not.
But if you deny that God exists (the
negative bias in science), then you can only investigate what people say and
believe and do. Hence not God Himself. The only way that God can be
investigated scientifically is (a) to grant that God might exist (positive
bias in science), and (b) to use the method of correspondences in Sacred
Scripture (not physical measurement).
In relation to God, theistic psychology takes the positive bias interpretation
in science. This is the same as saying that
God is a significant and traceable influence on human behavior.
The
psychology of God is the study of how all human behavior is an outcome of how
people react to God, both consciously and unconsciously. Since God is
omnipotent and manages all phenomena, He also manages the minds of people,
both of the positive bias in science and of the negative bias in science. Nevertheless there is an
enormous difference in the quality of life in eternity of those who are
resuscitated into the positive bias mentality vs. those who are resuscitated
in the negative bias mentality. Swedenborg empirically determined this by
observation of thousands of cases he could observe in his dual consciousness,
natural and spiritual. Until age 57
Swedenborg, then a well known personality in Sweden, had consciousness only in
his natural mind, like all of us. Then suddenly he gained consciousness in his
spiritual mind as well. For the next 27 years until his death, he was leading
a life of dual citizenship, being able to interact with those already in the
afterlife and conscious in their spiritual mind, as well as those in the
physical world where he kept up his busy schedule as government mining
engineer, publisher of scientific journals, and member of the Swedish
legislative body. He published his observations and findings, which amount to
about 30 volumes in English translation. They are called collectively "the
Writings of Swedenborg." In theistic psychology they are called "the Writings
Sacred Scripture." In the course of
studying theistic psychology you will learn about the psychobiology of God
which describes the anatomy and physiology of the mental organs. This is a
necessary methodological focus for theistic psychology that describes the details of how God is a
significant and traceable influence on human behavior. From the scientific
perspective it is not
sufficient to merely believe that God affects people's lives. As a science,
theistic psychology has to rationally demonstrate and empirically illustrate
the mechanisms that God uses to influence human behavior. In the positive bias
approach in science, God is real, and therefore there must be a scientific answer to how God
exerts influence upon human behavior. This answer needs to be investigated. It
cannot be investigated in non-theistic psychology, which continues to remain
in the negative bias mentality of science, denying that God, revelation, and Divine Speech as Sacred Scripture
have a scientific reality. When God and Sacred Scripture are denied as real
phenomena, then research on God is not allowed either. As already indicated,
research about people's beliefs and attitudes about God is not research
about God. The psychology of God provides answers
regarding where God is in our mind, how He gets there, why we don't see Him,
what He is doing there, how we are best to handle this situation, what
potential benefits are there, and related issues and puzzles.
The following discussion provides an overview of theistic psychology. You will
notice that the same sub-topic appears in different places more than once or
twice. The reason is that this is such a new topic for most people that it
helps to have the same issue handled more than once and in a different
context. In this way you will be learning more than facts, but also a
thinking register. For instance if you are very good at something,
whatever it is, you are an "expert" at that thing relative to many other
people. When two "experts" get together they can talk "shop"
with each other, and others
may get the feeling that they don't understand what's being discussed. In
addition, experts can solve problems others cannot. This is because they are
able to reason things out from experience and reflection.
This more powerful (expert) way of thinking
about something is called a specialized thinking register. You will learn to
think rationally and scientifically about God. You will practice applying
scientific and rational thinking to God. Hence the apparent repetitions
of topics throughout theistic psychology is not redundant information to be
skipped, but opportunities to build facts into principles, and these into an
expert thinking register about God. Every
human being has God in the mind. This reality is the rational and empirical
basis of defining God as a scientific concept. Since God is immortal, our
conjunction with God from birth, makes us also immortal. Since God intervenes
and interacts with everything we intend, reason, and do, it is for scientific
research to investigate how this interaction takes place in every human being.
Every human being has heaven and
hell in the
mind, from birth, as part of the inherited human mental anatomy. Heaven
is a mental state in eternity that is operational within the affective organ of our
spiritual mind (see Section xx). This operation exists within the human
virtues. All individuals who operate within the consciousness, intention,
effort, and love of virtues, develop this affective organ so that after
separation from the physical world, they exist in that state of eternity
called heaven (see Section xx). Every human
being has hell in the mind, from birth and inherited mental anatomy of
the natural mind. Hell is a state in eternity that is operational
within the affective organ of our natural-sensuous mind (see Section xx). This
operation exists within the human vices. All individuals who operate
within the consciousness, intention, effort, and love of vices, develop
this affective organ so that after separation from the physical world, they
exist in that state of eternity called hell (see Section xx).
From the religious perspective, based on the plain literal meaning of
Sacred Scripture, heaven is being with God in eternity as a reward we
earned for being faithful in our religion while we were on earth. And hell, is
a Divine punishment or an inevitable negative consequence, of living a life of
"sin", which is contrary to religion.
From the scientific perspective of
theistic psychology, based on the hidden correspondential meaning of Sacred
Scripture, both heaven and hell are mental states that are operational
within our mental organs, and these are already in eternity from birth (see
Section xx). As observed by Swedenborg, people make their own choices
regarding where they exist in the conscious afterlife of eternity (see Section
xx). The choices they make are according to their loves -- what they like
most, what they are most enchanted with, what they are unwilling to give up no
matter what. This is what pulls them to live their
immortal existence either within human virtues (heaven), or within human vices
(hell). In terms of Swedenborg's observations of samples of human beings
entering the afterlife in the eighteenth century, more people from this earth chose to be in
their vices, than in their virtues!
Unfortunately, the people who choose hell
become progressively worse and live a sub-human life devoid of orderliness,
intelligence and happiness. This is a built in endless degradation of the
operations of the natural-sensuous mind that is unwilling to be
governed by the rational mind. In contrast, people who choose to live in their
virtues are happy, married to their soul mate, intelligent, decent, and
beautiful, and they grow in these traits endlessly to eternity. This is a
built in elevation of the operations of the spiritual-rational mind
(see Section xx).
Topic 1. The Negative Bias in Science vs. the Positive Bias in Science
Science exists in two different orientations called the negative bias in
science and the positive bias in science (see Section xx). The negative bias
in science denies that anything exists except that which is natural, and
constructed out of physical matter in time and space. For instance, thoughts
and feelings are defined as nothing more than electrical and chemical activity in the brain
cells and their "emergent" properties. The
negative bias in science denies the existence of God, of life after death, of Divine
revelation, of consciousness as real, of a spiritual world in eternity outside time
and space, of the possibility that anyone can communicate with people who have
already departed from this world through death of the physical body. The denial of all of this
by materialistic science follows automatically from the denial
of anything outside time, space, and energy. This denial is called the
negative bias orientation or paradigm in science.
It is called a bias because this position has
never been proven by science. It is a mutually chosen premise, an unproven assumption, an
agreement by scientists among each other to exclude anything from science that isn't
material in time
and space. This methodological position is sometimes called "materialism" or
"materialistic monism." This is the attitude and orientation that you have
been exposed to in your science and psychology courses throughout education.
"God and science don't mix" -- we were told and taught. "It's unscientific to
talk about God in science" is another popular persuasion. So we were not told
that denying God in science is a negative bias in science. We were told that denying God
in science is scientific.
It makes a big difference whether school children are told one or whether they
are told the other. Telling us that God in science is unscientific goes deeper
into our persuasion than telling us that God in science is denied by
assumption and agreement not by proof. More resistance to the idea of God in
science is created in our mind when we are told it is unscientific, rather
than there is an unproven agreement in science to exclude God. Clearly there
is an element of ideology in science rather than rationality. The negative
bias in science agreement methodologically excludes the writings of any scientist who
includes God in their theoretical explanation.
An example of systematic exclusion from science is the work of Emanuel
Swedenborg (1688-1772), whose writings have been excluded from being even
mentioned in history of psychology textbooks and handbooks, despite the fact
that Swedenborg wrote the first textbook of psychology called Rational
Psychology (1742) in which you can find the major topics of psychology in
the 20th century, including the focus on the brain and its functions. For
instance, Swedenborg was the first scientist to propose that the anatomical
and physiological evidence indicates that the left brain specializes in
cognitive operations, while the right brain in affective operations (see
Section xx). Swedenborg was the first known modern scientist whose theories
were explicitly theistic. The positive bias orientation in science
-- also unproven, hence a bias -- is that God exists, that
reality consists of two worlds, one natural in
physical time and space, the other spiritual or mental, outside time and space.
The spiritual world of eternity is also called the afterlife.
What is critically different in this orientation is the recognition that
thoughts and feelings are not electro-chemical operations in the neurons of
the brain since thoughts and feelings are
non-material substances, while the brain contains only material substances or
matter. Material substances of the physical brain are in the time-space world,
while mental substances and operations -- thoughts and feelings -- are in the mind
or in the
world of eternity (not in the time-space world ). This is the fundamental
difference that you must try to understand right from the start of your study
of theistic psychology. Why is the
spiritual world of eternity and afterlife = the mental world?
Isn't the mental world right here and now in my mind? The mental world of my
thoughts and feelings are alive in me right now. So why are you calling
thoughts and feelings as operations in eternity? How can the spiritual world
be the same as my mental world? If our eternity is in the mental world, is it
really an objective place we can go to after we die? Etc. Etc. These are all
the questions that may be crowding your mind. All of them will be answered in
your mind when you begin to form a cumulative and coherent account of its
various pieces and how they are integrated with each other. Diagrams will be
given to help you in this task. Until the 19th century, most
scientists accepted the positive bias in science, including the founders of
modern science -- Galileo, Newton, Darwin, Einstein. By the end of the 19th
century and onward with the 20th, the negative bias in science became
prevalent. Nevertheless the positive bias in science continued strong with
scientists who were familiar with the Writings of the Swedish scientist
Emanuel Swedenborg (1688-1772). In contemporary psychology the positive bias
in science
based on Swedenborg's Writings continues with the new field of theistic
psychology, created by Dr. Leon James, Professor of Psychology at the
University of Hawaii (see the online work Theistic Psychology at www.soc.hawaii.edu/leonj/theistic
) The American Psychological Association
(APA) oversees and sets standards for doctoral training programs in all
accredited clinical psychology departments and schools in the United States.
In the past few years there has been a greater recognition that "theistic
psychotherapy" is a desirable and necessary development in clinical
psychology. An example is the APA Psychotherapy Training Videos program
intended for mental health professionals. One training video for clinical
psychologists approved by the APA is the following:
The information below is displayed at:
http://www.apa.org/videos/4310716.html
Theistic Integrative Psychology shows an
approach for incorporating belief in God into therapy. An important aspect
of this therapy is the assumption that spirituality and faith are central to
many people's lives, and therefore therapists should be open to including
religious beliefs in their work with clients.
In this session, Dr. P. Scott Richards works
with a 60-year-old African American woman who was recently diagnosed with
diabetes. He first seeks to understand how she is handling this news and the
accompanying thoughts about her mortality and then looks at how her
spiritual beliefs are both helping and hindering her process of coping.
This approach is distinguished from most
therapeutic models in that its primary worldview is that God and
spirituality often play an important role in people's lives: The
starting point for Dr. Richard's theistic integrative approach is theistic,
as opposed to the naturalistic or atheistic starting point for other models
in psychotherapy.
This approach is distinguished from most
therapeutic models in that its primary worldview is that God and
spirituality often play an important role in people's lives: The starting
point for Dr. Richard's theistic integrative approach is theistic, as
opposed to the naturalistic or atheistic starting point for other models in
psychotherapy.
This is an integrative approach in which many
psychotherapeutic approaches may be incorporated, including person-centered
and cognitive approaches, depending on which may be most suitable for the
client. Tailoring the therapy to the individual client while also being
open to the role of God in the client's life will result in more effective
therapy. Assessment includes questions about religious beliefs and
affiliations as well as more typical questions to assess mood and
psychological traits.
To use this approach, a psychologist need not
adhere to traditional religious beliefs, although having respect for and
some understanding of spiritual worldviews is helpful. A therapist who is
not a believer might look at this approach as a way to treat religious
clients in a culturally sensitive way. Whether the therapist believes in God
or not, the most important thing to remember when allowing religious belief
to enter therapy is that the therapist must never impose his or her own
beliefs on the client. The goal of this therapy is to look for how the
client's beliefs might help (or hinder) the journey to psychological
healing.
To learn more about this approach, Dr. Richards
recommends continuing education classes as well as reading literature on
theistic integrative psychology.
P. Scott Richards received his PhD in counseling
psychology in 1988 from the University of Minnesota. He has been a faculty
member at Brigham Young University since 1990 and is a professor in the
Department of Counseling Psychology and Special Education.
He is coauthor of the first and second editions
of A Spiritual Strategy for Counseling and Psychotherapy
(American Psychological Association [APA], 2005); coeditor of the
Handbook of Psychotherapy and Religious Diversity (APA, 2000), and the
Casebook for a Spiritual Strategy in Counseling and Psychotherapy
(APA, 2004).
He was given the Dissertation of the Year Award
in 1990 from APA Division 5 (Evaluation, Measurement, and Statistics). In
1999, he was awarded the William C. Bier Award from APA Division 36
(Psychology of Religion). He is a fellow of Division 36, served as secretary
of the division from 2000 to 2003, and is currently president of the
division. Dr. Richards is a licensed psychologist and maintains a small
private psychotherapy practice at the Center for Change in Orem, Utah.
Richards, P. S. (2005). Theistic
integrative psychotherapy. In L. Sperry & E. P. Shafranske (Eds.),
Spiritually oriented psychotherapy (pp. 259–286). Washington, DC: American
Psychological Association.
Richards, P. S., & Bergin, A. E. (Eds.). (2000).
Handbook of psychotherapy and religious diversity. Washington, DC: American
Psychological Association.
Richards, P. S., & Bergin, A. E. (Eds.). (2004).
Casebook for a spiritual strategy in counseling and psychotherapy.
Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Richards, P. S., & Bergin, A. E. (2005). A
spiritual strategy for counseling and psychotherapy (2nd ed.). Washington,
DC: American Psychological Association.
APA Videos
© 2007 American Psychological
Association
The above information is displayed at:
http://www.apa.org/videos/4310716.html
I am presenting this information to show
that the science of psychology is moving in a new direction which allows it to
discuss God as a real person with whom the individual has a real relationship.
This is not the same as saying that the therapist is to accept God as
scientific reality, but only that the client is allowed to discuss God with
the therapist as a legitimate, even healthy relationship in daily life. Before
this we have a contrastive attitude for more than 100 years in psychology
during which God was categorized as a non-existent entity people invented as a
crutch (Freud) and to whom they prayed by superstition or delusion (Skinner).
This new attitude by the scientifically conscious American Psychological
Association is remarkable whose importance has not yet been fully grasped by
the profession.
It is easy to falsely dismiss the
significance of this new perspective for the reason that the therapist does
not have to believe in God, but only to accept the legitimacy of the client's
relationship to God. Hence nothing has really changed in the science of
psychology. However this is missing something important. Even if licensed
therapists don't have to accept the reality of God, nevertheless they must act
like and talk like God is a real person!
I repeat this most important new perspective
in the science of psychology: Henceforth licensed therapists in the United
States must acquire the ability to administer mental health services that
address God as a real person. This
fundamentally changes the monolithic atheistic supremacy that has dictated the
negative bias materialism in psychology for the past 100 years.
Freud and Skinner are no longer around to fight against this new direction in
psychology. Even so, theistic psychology still remains outside the boundaries
even for the new direction in theistic psychotherapy. The reason is that the
Swedenborg Reports are not considered relevant or necessary, and hence
absolutely nothing is known empirically about the mental world of eternity and
afterlife. Theistic psychology accepts these reports as scientifically valid.
The rational and methodological justification for this orientation follows.
Here is the foundation principle for the existence of theistic
psychology, as stated in the Writings of Swedenborg:
AC 2568. It has been said above in this
chapter that doctrine would become null and void if the rational were
consulted (n. 2516, 2538); and that it was not consulted (n. 2519, 2531).
But here it is said that the doctrine of faith was enriched with goods and
truths both rational and natural. At first view these statements appear as
if they were adverse and contrary to each other; and yet are not so. How the
case was with the Lord, has been stated; but how it is with man, remains to
be told.
[2] As regards man it is one thing to regard the doctrine of faith from
rational things, and altogether another to regard rational things from the
doctrine of faith. To regard the doctrine of faith from rational things is
not to believe in the Word, or in the doctrine thence derived, until one is
persuaded from rational things that it is so; whereas to regard rational
things from the doctrine of faith is first to believe in the Word, or in the
doctrine therefrom, and then to confirm the same by rational things. The
former is inverted order, and results in nothing being believed; whereas the
latter is genuine order, and causes the man to believe the better. It is the
former that is here meant by its being said that Abimelech should die
because of the woman; by which is signified that the doctrine of faith would
become null and void if the rational were consulted (n. 2516, 2538); but the
latter is meant by its being said that Abimelech gave flock and herd, and
menservants and maidservants; by which is signified that the doctrine of
faith was enriched with rational and natural goods and truths.
[3] These things are much treated of in the Word in its internal sense,
especially where Asshur and Egypt are spoken of; for the reason that while
the doctrine of faith is regarded from rational things, that is, while a man
does not believe until he is persuaded from them that it is so, it then not
only becomes null and void, but whatever is contained in it is also denied;
whereas when rational things are regarded from the doctrine of faith, that
is, when a man believes the Word, and afterwards the same things are
confirmed by rational things, the doctrine is then living and whatever is
contained in it is affirmed.
[4] There are therefore two principles; one of which leads to all folly and
insanity, and the other to all intelligence and wisdom. The former principle
is to deny all things, or to say in the heart that we cannot believe them
until we are convinced by what we can apprehend, or perceive by the senses;
this is the principle that leads to all folly and insanity, and is to be
called the negative principle. The other principle is to affirm the things
which are of doctrine from the Word, or to think and believe within
ourselves that they are true because the Lord has said them: this is the
principle that leads to all intelligence and wisdom, and is to be called the
affirmative principle.
[5] The more they who think from the negative principle consult things
rational, the more they consult memory-knowledges, and the more they consult
things philosophical, the more do they cast and precipitate themselves into
darkness, until at last they deny all things. The causes of this are, that
no one can apprehend higher things from lower ones, that is, spiritual and
celestial things, still less Divine things, from lower ones, because they
transcend all understanding, and moreover everything is then involved in
negatives from that principle. On the other hand, they who think from an
affirmative principle can confirm themselves by whatever things rational, by
whatever memory-knowledges, and whatever things philosophic they have at
command; for all these are to them things confirmatory, and give them a
fuller idea of the matter.
[6] Moreover there are some who are in doubt before they deny, and there are
some who are in doubt before they affirm. They who are in doubt before they
deny are they who incline to a life of evil; and when this life carries them
away, then insofar as they think of the matters in question they deny them.
But they who are in doubt before they affirm are they who incline to a life
of good; and when they suffer themselves to be bent to this by the Lord,
then insofar as they think about those things so far they affirm. As this
subject is further treated of in the verses which follow,. it is permitted
of the Lord's Divine mercy to illustrate them more fully there (see n.
2588).
(AC 2568)
In other words, we can assume the negative bias in science when we examine the
proposal that God exists and that upon death we enter the afterlife of
eternity. Since the negative bias proof requires physical measurement it is
not possible to apply this method to God or the afterlife. Therefore to
exclude God or the afterlife as real requires a bias. This negative bias says
that what is not physical is not real. The reason it is called a bias is that
non-physical things could exist or be real, yet the negative bias would deny
it, hence deny what is true and real. But there is an important tradition in
science that recognizes that science has two components, one called empirical,
the other called rational.
In non-theistic psychology empirical refers to physical measurement. In
theistic psychology empirical means sensory observation, which can be either
physical or mental. In all science theory and explanation goes beyond
empirical data. This is why scientific theories are almost always wrong, even
though they appear correct when proposed. Later research however, and further
developments in science, eventually abandon all the old theories and propose
new ones, which a little later, will also be abandoned. So science proceeds by
scientific theories that are continually abandoned as wrong when they were at
first accepted as correct. How can this process proceed and have a good
outcome?
The answer is that all theories and all data in science must be structured to
be logical, consistent, and rational. In non-theistic psychology this has been
achieved so far only in ideal and not yet in reality. For the most part,
scientific theories in non-theistic psychology do not agree with each other
regarding what the facts, how they ought to be explained, and what to do about
it. In general research in non-theistic psychology proceeds within highly
specialized fields and only a few psychologists acknowledge and are part of
that field and its research. Others reject much of the research that one group
considers real. This confusing state of non-theistic psychology will continue
until the entire field becomes fully rational, which means integrated into a
whole, instead of into parts that do not recognize each other. In theistic
psychology research and knowledge development start with the positive bias
regarding God and Sacred Scripture. So it is a top down science, departing
from Sacred Scripture understood in correspondences, and deducing all the
principles from it through the positive bias in science. Each principle is
then empirically applied and verified through observation. Hence theistic
psychology is a fully integrated and rational science.
I have been teaching theistic psychology to college students who are majoring
in psychology and are being prepared for professional and graduate school.
The most difficult issue in their mind regarding the scientific status of the
Swedenborg Reports is that his observations are not replicable by other
scientists. They were taught that science means proof that can be
replicated by other scientists. The students also report that the friends and
family with whom they discuss the Swedenborg Reports, also are bothered by
this one issue, saying, Why should you believe this man from the 18th century
who says he talked to the dead? And how many others have also claimed this?
Etc.
But the fact is that no one in the history of science, philosophy, psychology,
theology, literature has ever claimed to have been dual citizens for decades,
and no one in the history of literature has discussed or described what
Swedenborg observed and explained. So the dismissive idea of Why should I
believe him -- does not apply here at all. Here we have a unique situation in
science and history and it deserves its own rational and impartial assessment.
The replicability issue is actually not a critical one in this case. Everyone
will be able to replicate and verify what Swedenborg describes. This occurs 30
hours after death, when we are awakened through the process of resuscitation
and begin our life of eternity in our spiritual mind (see Section xx). At that
point everyone can verify the accuracy of the Swedenborg Reports. The fact
that no one can so until after resuscitation is not critical in this case as
long as the following eight scientific and rational assessment criteria are
applied.
Can it be demonstrated to scientists and students that the Swedenborg Reports
contain observation and theory fully characterized by:
-
consistency
-
completeness
-
rationality
-
abstract or mechanistic explanatory mechanisms
-
ability to account for more of the known
possibilities
-
ability to generate verifiable predictions
-
ability to provide greater control of self and
environment
-
consistency with universal human values.
The answer is Yes for all eight assessment criteria. For this reason, the
issue of delayed replicability is not critical. There are other examples in
science that are accepted as one time events that cannot be replicated, and
there are also examples in science where replication is even theoretically
impossible. There are no other books, theories, systems, or records in
human history and literature that meet the above eight assessment criteria.
Exercise:
If you are interested in pursuing the logical issue of introducing God in
science, study the following electronic discussion on the logic of proving the
negative in science, at:
http://archive.internalspace.co.uk/cgi-bin/Blah/Blah.pl?b=cc,v=display,m=1098071640,s=all
Summarize the various points that are made. Review them and see what you agree
with. Does this give you a better idea of what proof in science really is?
What is your conclusion regarding the positive bias in science, as proposed in
theistic psychology? 1.0.1.1
Substantive Dualism: We Are Born Dual Citizens The basic premises of the positive bias
in science
are
-
substantive dualism (see Section xx)
-
theism or the acknowledgment of God as
Creator and Manager (see Section xx)
-
revelations of scientific knowledge
through Sacred Scripture (see Section xx)
Science studies
all of reality. If anything is part of reality, science tries to investigate it
and to understand it rationally. The positive bias in science says that God is
part of reality, and therefore, science is going to try to investigate God as
a scientific concept.
The negative bias in science says that God is not part
of reality, hence there is no point even trying to investigate something that
does not exist, or does not actually influence the outcome of events and
phenomena.
Sometimes people try to take up an in between position, saying that
God does exist, but this cannot be investigated by science. God is just a
matter of personal faith or belief. This idea arbitrarily, with no proof or
evidence, limits what science
is. The alternative view is to say that science tries to investigate all
reality. So, if God is actually part of reality, science should try to
investigate God as a possible scientific fact.
This is similar to the situation where
scientists have proposed the idea that there are other intelligent beings on
the planets in vast space who might be trying to communicate with us by radio
waves from outer space. So these scientists acquired research funds from the federal government
to build large radio telescopes and transmitters that can receive possible messages from
outer space by an alien civilization. Other scientists ridiculed the idea, saying that there is no
evidence whatsoever that intelligent beings exist elsewhere but on
earth, and there is much evidence to suggest that the evolution of life cannot
repeat itself in more than one place. There is a negative bias in science towards the idea of aliens, and
scientists holding that bias would not investigate the existence of aliens in
outer space. They cite
many scientific reasons to show that this idea is a pipe dream, not a
scientific hypothesis. You can see the positive and negative bias
clashing in science regarding life on other planets.
But you need to realize that the positive bias in science for the existence of life on
other planets is also a materialistic idea and does not require dualism. The positive
bias in science
for unknown phenomena is something fairly common and normal in science. What is
unusual is to have the positive bias in science extend to God. Why is this?
There are
hundreds of thousands of scientists alive today who are firm believers in the
existence of God, as shown by the fact that they talk to God in prayer,
worship Him, and study Sacred Scripture as the Word of God. These scientists
know that God is
omnipotent and that nothing happens without God allowing it to happen because
of some rational end or purpose. These religious scientists acknowledge
that God intervenes in the experiments they run in their laboratories, and
also, in their effort and ability to write the results as a published
scientific report. And yet, note this: God does not appear anywhere in
their report! I did the same thing
for many years as a
trained scientist in the field of psychology. At one point in my career as a
professor and researcher, I adopted the positive bias in science regarding God's
existence (see Section xx). I tried in different ways to write a journal
article about the reality of God and how we need to take God into account in
our principles of psychology when we describe learning, human development, personality
change, or sports psychology. If God is a reality, and actually influences
how people learn, develop, change, or acquire skills, then clearly we should
investigate that causal relationship between God and human behavior. Is
this not obvious? Since we all have been
educated to think from the orientation of the negative bias against God in
a materialistic science, we can expect that certain standard objections will come to
our mind when we hear the proposal that God should be part of science.
For instance,
we might think that "God may be a reality in the ultimate sense, but God is not participating
as something apart from the natural laws that science investigates. God may
have originally created these natural laws, along the natural world of time
and space, but there is no scientific reason to suppose that God is now
intervening in the normal course of these natural laws
and conditions."
This line of reasoning shifts the issue away from
(1) "Is
God a reality or not"
to another issue, namely,
(2) "God does not intervene in
reality."
Do you see this? But this shift is not logical because the second issue logically comes
only after the
first issue has been settled, and cannot come before it.
In other words, we cannot decide on whether God "intervenes in reality" or not
(2), unless we
first decide whether "God is a reality" or not (1). Can you see this?
So we must come back to the first and most fundamental issue in science
regarding God, namely, God exists, or not.
If you are going to enjoy studying
theistic psychology, you may consider adopting the positive bias in science on a
limited basis to begin with. This means that you are going to say to
yourself: "I am going to take on the role of someone who says that it
is possible that God could become a scientific concept."
That's all. You
don't actually have to believe it, if you don't want to.
In the past, all
students were able to enact this role while reading, writing, and discussing
theistic psychology. Some students were actually glad that there is such a
thing as a positive bias of God in science. Others stated that it was fun, but
that they are going to go back to the negative bias in science. You can read their
generational reports in theistic psychology listed in the
Readings in Volume 18, Part 2.
Remember:
the positive bias in science does
not mean that you are required to accept, or pretend to accept, that God is a scientific
concept. Instead, adopting the positive bias in science is to say that you accept the
possibility that God can be a scientific concept, and therefore you are
ready to investigate what the evidence for it is that this course offers. Most educated people
like us have acquired the
negative bias belief against the idea that God should be included as part of
science. So it's not easy to now all of a sudden to adopt the positive bias in
science by
saying to ourselves, "Let me investigate what theistic psychology is saying. I cannot
logically do this unless I first accept the possibility that this could be
real, not just a pretend game."
Think of the non-theistic psychology courses
you took in high school and college. When did you ask yourself the question,
"Can this materialistic view of the mind be valid and real?" Probably never. This is because you were
still young and you were still not thinking for yourself from yourself (see
Section xx). But as people enter their third decade of life they begin to ask
questions in their own mind about ideas and principles they imbibed and never
examined. God in science is one of them. Does God really exist in a scientific
way of intervening with phenomena that scientists are studying -- in which
case God is actually part of the chain of causation they are looking for? Do I really want to deny God's existence
in science because after all, what if the scientists are wrong about
that? What kind of methodology would be needed to provide proof of God as a
causative factor in phenomena?
When you begin to ask yourself these kinds of
questions, you are beginning to think from yourself, rather than from acquired
socialization habits of thinking. This thinking from self is a sign of
maturation as an adult. In this sense, some people never become mature adults
since they are unwilling to acquire the habit of thinking from self regarding
God.
Theistic psychology will show you why one
should acquire the habit of thinking from oneself (see Section xx). Swedenborg
reports that when people are resuscitated, a few hours after death (see
Section xx), they quickly give up their belief in God, when it is based on
persuasive teachings that had been uncritically accepted, without reasoning
from self whether they are true or not according to their own rational
comprehension. But it is different with hose whose idea of God was based on
their own reflection and thinking, and made God part of their reality. They
continue to reflect upon God along their rational understanding, which
Swedenborg reports is far greater after resuscitation than before -- for
everyone. In other words, when our natural mind becomes dormant and we live in
our spiritual mind in eternity, our rational thinking ability is a discrete
level higher than the highest we are capable in our natural mind. Our everyday
level of thinking now is from the natural mind, but after death and
resuscitation, our life of immortality takes place in our spiritual mind (see
Section xx). The spiritual mind functions at a discrete degree higher than the
natural mind. We are more intelligent after death than before, far more so, as
frequently observed by Swedenborg in the afterlife of our spiritual mind (see Section xx). And so now, since you have
become a student of theistic psychology, you are receiving the unusual
opportunity of examining critically, rationally, and scientifically, whether
or not God
can be part of scientific reality and investigation.
If you are not willing to
say, "Maybe yes", then how can you enjoy the study of theistic psychology?
If you think "No way. It's not possible" can you go through the objective evaluation process of examining the
idea as a scientist would? Theistic psychology has brought together many
rational considerations that you can examine. The Swedenborg reports, upon
which theistic psychology is based, are a unique collection of writings in the
history of modern science. They allow you to examine the empirical
observations and rational explanations of a notable historical figure who has
influenced many brilliant writers and scientists (see Section xx). Since
theistic psychology is a scientific field, its methodology and reasoning
process are rational, empirical, behavioral, anatomical, and neurophysiological (see Section xx).
In theistic psychology the brain in the physical body and the mind in the
mental body are connected by the laws of correspondences
(see Section xx). When we
are born, we acquire a physical body in time-space and a mental body in
eternity, that is, in the mental world of the human race. In the physical
body we have organs like the brain and the heart that make up the physical
body in time-space.
In the mental body located in eternity from birth onward, we have organs like the
-
affective organ (which corresponds to the
heart and circulatory system in the physical body)
-
cognitive organ (which corresponds to the
lungs and respiratory in the physical body)
-
sensorimotor organ (which corresponds to
the brain and neurons throughout the physical body)
As you can see the mental body contains the organs that give rise to
feelings, thoughts, and sensations. Consider that right now, you are reading
this and thinking about it, and having various feelings or emotions about it.
These thoughts and feelings are non-material -- not in time-space-matter.
Thoughts and feelings and sensations are mental things, not physical. Mental
things are in the mental world and this has no space or matter. think about
your dreams and daydreams. They take place in the mental world of the human
race. There is only one mental world and we are all having our thoughts in
this mental world where our mental body was born and will continue living
forever (see Section xx).
Note also that every physiological detail of the physical body is mirrored in
the mental body so that when your physical body dies and you are resuscitated
in the mental world of humanity, your appearance is unchanged even though you
are then in your mental body. This shows that the temporary physical body in
time-space is a copy of the permanent mental body in eternity. It is not
generally known that eternity = mental world, so do not be surprised if this
appears odd to you at first, and to the friends with whom you discuss it. Our mind, like our brain
and sense organs, is an organic structure made of sub-components, like the heart
which
has a left and a right portion, each doing their own work or function. The
mind's organic anatomy has been revealed in the Writings. There are three major
levels of mental operations or states to keep track of in order to understand how our mind
works and how we can control its direction and development.
Anatomical levels or states of the mind:
-
(3) The celestial state or level of operation (= the
"celestial mind")
-
(2) The spiritual state or level of operation (= the
"spiritual mind")
-
(1) The natural state or level of operation (= the "natural
mind")
You also need to keep track of the type of operation in the
mind of which there are three.
Types of operations or functions of the mind:
-
(i) The affective operations in the affective organ of the
mind (= the "will")
-
(ii) The cognitive operations in the cognitive organ of the
mind (= the "understanding")
-
(iii) The sensorimotor operations in the sensorimotor organ
of the mind (= the "sensations")
Affective operations are feelings, motivations, impulses,
tendencies, affections, loves. Cognitive operations are thoughts, ideas,
concepts, images, and reasonings. Sensorimotor operations are sensations,
attentional focus, and motor determinations or behavioral sets.
If you keep track of the three types of operations at the
three levels, you will have a chart in your understanding by which you can
comprehend or research almost anything about the human mind. This chart would
look this:
|
LEVELS OF OPERATION
|
TYPES OF
MENTAL OPERATIONS |
|
III
celestial
mind |
celestial affective
(9) |
celestial cognitive
(8) |
celestial
sensorimotor
(7) |
|
II
spiritual
mind |
spiritual affective
(6) |
spiritual cognitive
(5) |
spiritual
sensorimotor
(4) |
|
I
natural
mind |
natural affective
(3) |
natural cognitive
(2) |
natural
sensorimotor
(1) |
I call this type of chart an "ennead matrix" which the
dictionary defines as a structure of nine. In this case the mind's operations
can be tracked by an ennead matrix that displays nine categories of operations
to keep track of in describing the mind's operations:
-
(9) the celestial feelings (affective level 3)
-
(8) the celestial thoughts (cognitive level 3)
-
(7) the celestial sensations (sensorimotor 3)
-
(6) the spiritual feelings (affective level 2)
-
(5) the spiritual thoughts (cognitive level 2)
-
(4) the spiritual sensations (sensorimotor 2)
-
(3) the natural feelings (affective level 1)
-
(2) the natural thoughts (cognitive level 1)
-
(1) the natural sensations (sensorimotor 1)
It helps a lot in deepening your understanding of this
universal spiritual human structure if you can reproduce it yourself on a piece
of paper and if you can then explain it to someone.
Here is the way I explain it. We have feelings, thoughts, and
sensations. I call this the "threefold self." These operations define what the
mind is. We can have these operations at different levels of consciousness and
rationality. For instance, we can have celestial feelings--like compassion for
someone's need, so that we reach out to help. Having or experiencing that
celestial feeling is what initiates our action of helping out. The feeling is
not enough because we need also to know what would help and how we can provide
it. These are thoughts, not feelings. In order to act on anything whatsoever we
need to have an initiating feeling or motive or need--these are equivalent in
that they are affective operations. Once this initiating feeling is felt or
experienced, it starts selecting from our cognitive mind those operations that
result in a cognitive plan for help that is assessed as adequate and workable.
So the affective operation begins the behavior, the cognitive operation directs
it, and the sensorimotor operation executes it. This way of talking about
behavior is called the "threefold self" (see Section xx).
-
The celestial self is the third or highest level of operation
of the mind (9 ==>8==>7)
-
The spiritual self is the second or intermediate level of
operation of the mind (6==>5==>4)
-
The natural self is the first or lowest level of operation of
the mind (3==>2==>1)
The numbers refer to the ennead matrix above. Note that the
sequence of behavior is always:
affective==>cognitive==>sensorimotor
The mind always operates by means of the affective,
cognitive, and sensorimotor operations working together. The natural mind
(cells 3,2,1) is what we are very familiar with because it is our daily conscious self
while we live on earth. We are unconscious of the operations that are always going on in
the spiritual mind (cells 6,5,4) and in the celestial mind (cells 9,8,7).
In order for the conscious natural mind to operate it is
necessary that the other two unconscious levels of the mind be operative. The
reason is that all operations of the mind are by correspondence reacting to the
influx of the Spiritual Sun. In other words, once the mind becomes operational
at birth, not only is it being built up by the spiritual heat and light of the
Spiritual Sun, but the portions that are built up have the capacity to receive
more spiritual heat and light, which initiates all the operations in the mind.
The mind is built out of the same substances that also activate it and keep it
functioning in perfect order to eternity. The mind is therefore not only an
immortal spiritual organ, but it is also constantly 'online' like an electric
stove that is plugged in and is thereby able to do its work of heat. Unplug it,
and the stove cannot do its work. It has to be 'online' and you know it from the
electricity bill at the end of the month!
The mind's operations are therefore dependent on the inflow
or "influx" of spiritual heat (or love) and spiritual light (or truth). This is
truly remarkable. The mind is made of love and truth and it is activated by love
and truth flowing in. At the same time, the mind has the capacity to invert the
incoming love and truth into their opposites. This inversion process requires
rational ability.
You need to remember that mental = spiritual = eternity. While we are in the
natural mind, we are not conscious of how everyone is in the same mental
world. We have total blindness in our spiritual mind. We have the illusion
that my mental world is private, and your mental world is private. And yet
this is not true in the spiritual mind, and Swedenborg proves it by his
reports, written from age 57 to 84 while he was conscious in both the natural
mind and in the spiritual mind. This means that he was able to see everything
we do in our natural mind, but in addition, he was conscious in the spiritual
mind, which does not happen to everyone else until resuscitation immediately
after our death (see Section xx).
So it's not a question of speculating about what happens after death. Theistic
psychology could not be a science if it is based on various people's
speculations about it. All evidence in the Swedenborg reports must be
examined, and this is done in theistic psychology from the positive bias
perspective. Swedenborg is the only scientist in the history of science who
was able to have direct observational access to the world of the afterlife,
where he interviewed those who had died recently, as well as a long time ago
(see Section xx).
Remember that in order for us to have real thoughts and feelings we must have
mental organs like the affective, cognitive, and sensorimotor organs that make up the mental body in
eternity from birth onward. In order to understand this explanation scientifically it is
necessary to consider that sensations, thoughts and feelings cannot exist in the physical
brain. Without coming to grips with this idea, it is not possible to see
clearly that we are born dual citizens, with a temporary physical body made of physical
substances in time-space, and a permanent mental body made of non-physical
substances in eternity (not in time-space). The two bodies are connected by
the laws of correspondence so that every single detail in the physical body is
reflected by a corresponding detail in the mental body. When we die, the
physical body disintegrates, but the mental body is immortal and continues
life in the world of eternity. We have all our thoughts and feelings with
us, our self and personality, since these are in the mental body to begin
with, and were never located in the physical body that dies.
This requires some thinking
through before you can see it clearly enough to be able to explain it
logically to your friends.
Since our thinking is persuasively immersed within the negative bias in
science, it is harder to let
go of its negative principles regarding the reality of something that is not
physical in time-space. The idea of something that is not physical and not in
time-space, sounds like something obscure and thinly existent, instead of
fully existent. You might for instance point out that your thoughts and
feelings don't have the same rock bottom existence as the house, the car, or
our salary raise. We can be rich and famous in our imagination, but
what is this but bubbles in the air that burst into nothing as we are forced to
live in poverty. If we did not get hired for a job we applied for, hopes
about their changing their mind will remain just that, thoughts and visions, not
actual reality. And so on. We can go on thinking like this because we have
been trained to reason this way following negative bias rules of logic that exclude the
possibility that your thoughts, hopes, and imagination are more rock bottom
real than the chocolate bar you could be eating while reading this.
Question: Which is more real, the chocolate bar you are thinking about while
reading this, or the chocolate bar in the store across the street?
What about
this: Which is more real, the chocolate bar you are eating, or the enjoyment
you are feeling?
Since we are born with a temporary physical body, whatever
that body eats is also temporary. And since we are born with a permanent
mental body, whatever that body eats is for eternity. We know what our
physical body eats; what does our mental body eat? Can you guess? Our mental
body eats mental food. You are familiar with the expression "food for
thought." What does it refer to? The mental organs in our mental body when we
are born are undeveloped. We are unable to think, to reason, to observe, to
remember, to know what we feel. The mind at birth is void of meaning and cultural content. A newborn infant has
a mental body that includes a sensorimotor organ, a cognitive organ, and an
affective organ, all ready to operate and activate the natural mind (see Section xx).
The natural mind grows and matures with daily development and accumulation of
experiences through the physical senses.
The spiritual mind also grows, but is unconscious to us while we are still
attached to the physical body in time. It grows not from input from the
physical world, but from input from the mental world. If you became conscious
right now in your spiritual mind, you would see what Swedenborg was able to
see -- namely, that everyone else was there since this is the common place for
all humanity right from birth. From his spiritual mind, Swedenborg was able to
see the mental body of everyone. This is how we know that the mental body
looks the same as the physical body since Swedenborg was able to recognize his
friends and family who had passed on.
The three mental organs are recognized in non-theistic psychology as well, and
you probably came across these concepts in your courses or readings. But there
is a fundamental difference, which is that non-theistic psychology does not
call them "organs" but "functions." This is like the difference between "negative
bias materialistic monism" and "positive bias substantive dualism"
(see Section xx). In the negative bias in science, cognitive operations are equated with
neural activity in the physical brain. In the positive bias in science, cognitive
operations are equated with the activity or change of state in the mental organ. Similarly, emotions are equated
with neural activity in localized portions of the physical brain (e.g.,
amygdala), while in the positive bias in science, emotions and feelings are equated with
the changes of state in the affective organ of the mental body.
You can see that if you deny that there is a mental organ in eternity outside
this physical world, then you are compelled to think that thoughts and
feelings exist in this world, and so you are then compelled to think that they
are merely subjective experiences of what the physical brain is doing. Once
you crossed this line you are completely immersed in materialistic monism. But
you can step away and outside of it now that you are involved in the study of
theistic psychology. You can consider rationally and scientifically what's involved in
the positive bias in science mode of thinking about time vs. eternity -- the fundamental
dualism of reality.
Once you realize that the negative bias in science is not a proven fact but a
chosen and voluntary bias, and once you realize that you have been taught the
negative bias in science without being told that is a bias, it might then be easier for
you to step out of the negative bias in science and step into the positive
bias in science.
Once you've chosen the conscious jump into the reality of dualism, you
can begin looking at your thoughts and feelings in a totally different light,
with a new meaning that is powerful and logical. Here is your first theistic
psychology concept rendered visually:

This visual concept is dualist. It has no meaning in non-theistic psychology.
But it does have meaning if you grant the positive bias that it is
scientifically possible that we are dual citizens. If this is possible then we
need a scientific account that is systematic, consistent, and cumulative or
holistic. All rational systems must have these properties and a science is a
rational system. This visual concept uses the method of visually representing discrete
dualist levels as one figure within another, or one form within another, or
one structure within another. The meaning of "within" is fundamentally
different within the the negative and positive bias in science. In non-theistic
psychology "within" refers to that which is deeper in a continuous sense. So
you would start from the surface of something and then go deeper and deeper
within it. An example is the use of "internal" in medicine to refer to the
organs we have within the body, in contrast with the organs we have on the
surface of the body, like the skin or the mouth cavity which are "external."
So "external vs. internal" are both still time-space concepts when you are thinking in
the negative bias mode. Can you explain that? But in the positive bias mode there is a duality of
discrete degrees or zones that are not continuous with each other. This property is
visually represented by the concentric forms. One cannot go from our physical
body to our mental body, or vice versa because there is a built in barrier
from creation. Every object that exists is created into one of the zones or
discrete degrees of reality. For instance, your shoes exist from matter in
time-space. This is called the natural world. Our physical body is born into
the natural world. But your mental body exists in the spiritual world, which
in theistic psychology, is called the mental world of the human race, which is
in eternity, no tin time-space (see Section xx).
The natural world cannot exist without the mental world and vice versa,
because the two worlds are locked into each other by the laws of correspondences
governing cause-effect relations. Here is a
further expansion of the concept of dual citizenship:

The "world of effects" is familiar to us from every day life since birth. It
is what goes on around us. While our thinking pattern is restricted to materialistic
logic, we think and talk an as-if language regarding reality. For instance, we
continue to use the expressions "sunrise" and "sunset" even though we know
rationally that the sun does not rise or set. A sign of our sub-conscious
materialism and monism is given off when we say "My brain is telling me to
..." or, "There is a brain drain in England to the migration of scientists to
the U.S.", or, "This book will show you how to develop your brain power." etc.
In other words we talk as-if we believe that our mental life of thinking and
feeling is in the operations of the brain. This is illogical when you examine
it rationally since thoughts and feelings are not electrical operations in
neuron cells. Mental operations exist in the mental world, which is apart or
independent of the time-space zone of the natural world. Our sensations,
thoughts, and feelings are not "on this earth" or "in this physical brain." To
say so is to commit the reductionist fallacy (see Section xx). Instead, we
rationally construct a dualist world, one in time-space, the other in
eternity, with the two locked into each other by the laws of correspondences
on a one to one and cause-effect basis (see Section xx).
Similarly, in our everyday situations we continue talking
as if the effects we see around us are caused by other things around us,
instead of them being correlations -- events that co-occur. For
instance, if we are asked to explain what causes the car to accelerate when we
drive and want to go faster, we say that pushing down the gas pedal causes the
car to go faster. But in the positive bias perspective of dualism all causes are in the
mental world of eternity, while all effects are in the physical world of time-space, the two
worlds being connected by the laws of correspondences. So it is our goal or
desire to go faster that is the cause of why the car is going faster. The
pedal being pressed is not the cause but a correlated effect of the cause,
the cause being the feeling that we want to go faster. In the
positive bias mode of science, events in the mental world of eternity are the
causes of events in the physical world of time-space. The mental world of
eternity is also called the spiritual world (see Section xx).
So the causes of events in the physical world are located in the mental world.
This may be obvious with the driving example, but it is equally true of the
weather and earthquakes, though the explanation is more involved. It will be
made clearer as you study theistic psychology (see Section xx).
For instance, when it rains here, it is an effect whose cause is in the
spiritual world
of eternity. When we lose our connection to the physical body through its
death, we are immediately resuscitated in our mental body in the spiritual
world of eternity where we continue our mental life of immortality (see
Section xx). The sensorimotor, cognitive and affective states of the human
race are the causes of all phenomena in the physical world -- climactic, geological,
vegetarian, and animal evolution and physiology. This makes rational sense
when you consider that God created the physical universe of time for the sake of
the human race in eternity
(see Section xx). Since we are used to think from the negative bias in science, we
normally reason that the physical world came first, and then human beings
developed from it, somehow, unspecified. But in the positive bias mode we are
not so restricted in our thinking.
From the perspective of dualism, that form of it that is revealed in Sacred
Scripture, God's purpose for creation is to populate a human heaven in
eternity, endlessly evolving in a positive direction. To accomplish this
purpose God created a physical world in time and space, and made every
phenomenon in it, be dependent on a mental cause connected to His purpose.
Hence it is that the physical world is created out of the mental world,
namely, the substances of good and truth, as an infrastructure for its
existence. The external portion of the physical world and its objects, is in
time-space, but its internal infrastructure a discrete degree within and apart
from time-space, is in eternity. What is in eternity is the cause of what
is time-space.
So it's not surprising that the evolution of animal species and plants on
earth reflect the mental states of the human race in eternity, since eternity
is the world of causes and time-space is the world of effects. Generally
speaking, you can see for instance that "paradisal" gardens and tame animal
species are the results of heavenly mental states in the human mind of
eternity. And hence you can also see that deserts, poisonous plants, and
dangerous animal species evolved in correspondence to the development of the
hells in the human race -- ferocious feelings of rage and vengeance give you
an idea of how these mental states connect to the ferocity and killing power
of some species of animals and plants (see Section xx). This connection can be
understood rationally if you consider the laws of cause-effect correspondences
between phenomena in time-space (effects) and mental states in eternity
(causes).
Note that this connection is complex and involves the mental world of the
entire human race. It would not be logical to think that the people who live
in deserts and jungles, surrounded by wild animals and poisonous plants, are
more negative in their thinking and feeling than people who live on tropical
islands. There is no such connection. It would be obviously unscientific to
make such claims. Rather, you need to see that there is an overall explanation
given here for the connection between the two worlds, on a one to one basis,
and since God created time-space to serve the human race, it's clear that the
control mechanism God created and is maintaining in order, goes from mental to
physical, not the other way round, from eternity to time, not the other way
round.
Later we will study why God could not create the human race
directly in eternity. Why do we have to be born dual citizens, die in the
physical body, then continue
life in eternity with the mental body? (see Section xx). Why could we not be born in eternity
directly with our mental body? A general answer has to do with the essence of what it is to
be human, namely to freely choose according to our reasoning (see Section xx).
If we had been born directly into eternity, we would be angelic
robots, hence not truly human. We need to have both heaven and hell in our
mind so that we can freely choose between them. God's law of spiritual freedom
is that every human being freely choose the lifestyle of heaven or that of
hell. If we had been born directly into our heaven, we would not be able to
choose between heaven and hell. And what we don't choose, we cannot love as-if
it were our own (see Section xx). We would then be in a heaven that we do not
consider our own -- which is really not a heaven at all. Hence it was
necessary for human beings to have a physical body for awhile, while
developing the natural mind in time-space. Meanwhile, the spiritual mind
remains unconscious, even though it continues to grow along with the natural
mind of which we are conscious in our daily life.
So in order to make things work, God created us dual citizens in such a way
that every single detail in the world of time is tied by correspondence to its
cause in the world of eternity. In this way the two worlds -- physical time
and mental eternity -- make a one by
the laws of correspondence. Without the world of eternity, the world of time could not
exist. So it's not too difficult for you to picture and comprehend this whole
process of creation, God, and the two worlds acting together by the laws of
correspondences to bring about God's purpose of an eternal heaven populated by
the human race.
As discussed, every species of animals corresponds to some human emotion and
reasoning process. In general, selfish and harmful motives and emotions cause
ferocious and dangerous animal species to come into existence and to thrive,
while heavenly traits cause the peaceful and non-dangerous species to come
into existence. The evolution of species of animals and plants is caused by
the biography of humanity's mental world in eternity. Your thoughts and feelings
right now, in this very moment, are not here on earth! This would not be
possible since thoughts and feelings are not in time and space. So what you
are thinking and feeling, along with the other people of the human race, are
events in eternity, not in time, not on earth.
The mental life of the human race is in eternity, and it is the cause of all
the details of the physical world -- animals, plants, geological formations,
earthquakes, sun spots, galaxies expanding, molecules hurtling in your cells,
etc. All physical phenomena are created and directed by God through the mental life of the
human race, which is in eternity. God's omnipotence extends to every detail,
but it is according to His Divine Love and Wisdom to use the mental world of
humanity as the trigger that causes the physical events on earth. In this way
the two worlds might be united as one, functioning in interdependent symbiosis
and synchrony.
These details are presented to you now so that you can become aware that
theistic psychology is one consistent rational account in which all parts are
fully integrated and consistent with each other. All the details presented
here so far will have to be followed by other details that fit consistently as
they are cumulated.
Not one single lack of fit is allowed in a rational science. This is quite
contrastive with non-theistic materialistic psychology where people propose a
variety of different theories that are not consistent with each other (see
Section xx). You will need to
reread theistic psychology Sections and paragraphs several times on different
days so that you can learn to cumulate your knowledge in a rational and
consistent manner. Only in this way can you
actually see that theistic psychology is fully rational, consistent,
cumulative, empirical, and scientific.
We don't ordinarily think of the mental world as
"real" in terms of being constructed of something, like we think of the brain
as "real," constructed out of
protein matter, which is ultimately from the natural sun in time-space. But the mind
is also real, being a spiritual mental body whose organs are
constructed of eternal substances from the Spiritual Sun in eternity
(see Section xx).
These eternal spiritual substances are mental and are real, more permanent than the physical brain, which is only
temporary, and eventually dies or disintegrates. But the mind in the mental
body is permanent or immortal, and
cannot die, once it is born. Hence our self and personality is immortal and at death we
continue life uninterrupted since the self is not in the physical brain or body that
dies. Approximately 30 hours after the physical body dies, we are awakened or "resuscitated"
in our spiritual mind which is the upper zone of the mental body in the world
of eternity. We appear to ourselves and to others there, as exactly the same as we were in the
physical body. But the mental body is a spiritual body, a permanent
body, an eternal or immortal body made of eternal substances. It is sometimes
called a "spiritual body" because the mental world of eternity is also
referred to as the "spiritual world" (see Section xx).
For further Discussion see
Section 12.0.5 in Volume 12
1.0.1.2
Theism in Theistic Science: Universe Created and Managed by
God
Theism
in theistic science is the premise that the universe is created and maintained in order
by God according to laws and procedures that God has revealed in Sacred
Scripture. The following conceptual chart is also discussed in more
detail elsewhere (see Section xx). For now, try to memorize it enough so that
you can reproduce it on a piece of paper as you are explaining it to a friend.
I recommend that you print the chart so you can look at it as you
follow the explanations below (select it, copy it, go to your word processor,
paste it, print it).
1.0.1.2.1
Born Into Eternity

The above theistic psychology concept, expressed in a schematic chart, is
arranged vertically with God on top and an ordered sequence of discrete
(discontinuous) layers
downward. It is both a map of spiritual geography and a schematic of mental
anatomy. See the
Layers Diagram.
In theistic psychology the word spiritual has the same meaning
as mental. The chart is called "born into eternity" to indicate our
dual citizenship (see Section xx). You need to remember that in all theistic
psychology charts and diagrams, what is on top is a discrete degree more
interior or "higher" than what is below. "Discrete" is the opposite of
"continuous." For instance, if you have a car and want to travel to Europe or
Japan with it, you can go all the way to the edge of the ocean, even if it is
thousands of miles away. But once you get there you cannot continue your
journey to Europe or Japan. You've gone as far as it is possible to go on a
continuous basis, getting closer and closer to the edge of the ocean. Now you
need to jump a discrete degree in means of transportation. You need a
different vehicle that operates in a totally different medium of
transportation, like a ship, airplane, rocket, or so called 'transport beams'. Cars and
ships are in discrete degree from each other as transportation venues. Cars and trains are in
continuous degrees with each other. Ships and airplanes are in discrete degree
with each other. Etc. (see Section xx). So
all charts and concepts in theistic psychology are arranged vertically, with
all the elements being in discrete degrees with each other and connected by
the laws of correspondence.
So as you inspect the chart of yourself "born into eternity," viewed schematically in the positive
bias mode of theistic psychology, what do you see? What reactions do you have?
This is no doubt the first time that such hidden knowledge about yourself is
being revealed in a psychology course! Look at what you are from a global
anatomical perspective. See how you are specifically connected to God,
regardless of what your beliefs are, or what your socialization and cultural
origins are. This chart is not about culture or religion: it's about the
anatomy and physiology of the human mind. There is only one human mind for the
whole human race. Every person's mental world is in that one common mental
world of humanity, and overlaps with it. We can see each other only through
the spiritual mind, which remains unconscious until resuscitation (see Section
xx). But Swedenborg had his spiritual mind become conscious while he was still
attached to the physical body. This is how he was able to write the Writings
Sacred Scripture, upon which theistic psychology is based.
As human beings we possess an immortal
mental body born into eternity and a temporary physical body attached to it.
The two are tied to each other by the laws of correspondence so that the
operations in the two bodies are completely integrated and acting
symbiotically as one organism. The physical body is shown at the bottom of the
chart
because it is located in time-space and constructed out of physical world
substances from the natural sun. "Bottom" means "most external"
or "lowest." "Top" means inmost and highest. The
physical body is external in time-space-matter, while the mental body (mind), is
internal in the world of eternity, and constructed out of the
substances of the Spiritual Sun.
If you ask people what is the world of
eternity and how they picture it, you get almost nothing. No one can have any
idea of it, except from Sacred Scripture. From this Divine source we know many
rational and scientific facts such as theistic psychology and theistic
science. The simplest way you can tell people what the world of eternity is
like, is to tell them to think about their own mental world -- their thoughts,
their dreams, their day dreams, their imagination, their logic and reasoning,
etc. Everybody is very familiar with their own mental world. But they don't
know these two things about it:
The only reason we cannot see each other in
our own mental world is that the natural mind is developed from the
information we have through the physical senses. Consequently all our concepts
and logic in the natural mind is time-bound and space-bound and matter-bound.
It's only if you abstract out these elements from your thinking, that you can
then think rationally with concepts that are not time-bound and space-bound.
What is not time-bound and space-bound is called eternity. With rational
concepts we can think scientifically about eternity, but not with sensory
concepts based on sensory input through physical senses. The spiritual mind,
on the other hand, does not receive anything through the physical senses of
the physical world, but only through the mental body whose senses receive
input from the mental world alone. Consequently, all the ideas we have in the
spiritual mind have nothing in common with the ideas we have in the natural
mind. On the chart born into eternity, you can see that the natural
mind (containing time-space concepts and logic), is separated from the
spiritual mind (containing only spiritual concepts and logic), by the
rational mind. The rational mind plays an
intermediate role between mental states patterned after time-space (natural
mind), and mental states patterned after eternity (spiritual mind). Later we
will also see how these three discrete zones of the mental world are
reproduced in the history and evolution of civilization, and as well, in the
history of Sacred Scripture, which was cumulatively written over thousands of
years (see Section xx). All this may sound intellectually intimidating to you,
perhaps even grandiose. This is a normal reaction when we are thi8nking from
the negative bias mode of materialism. Throughout our study of psychology
courses we have come to realize that non-theistic psychology is not unified,
is not rational, is not cumulative, and is only partially helpful in solving
real life problems like depression, rage, racial conflict, relationship
problems, abuse, crime, etc. etc. One explanation for this lack of power to
solve problems is to say that these problems are too complex to be solved. But
another explanation is that the knowledge and principles we have for solving
them are not very powerful, not very accurate, not realistic of actuality. The
negative bias monism is surely to blame for this lack of power since it
contradicts what a human being actually is. Note that
in the chart Sacred Scripture
is placed in the bottom zone of the natural world, along with our physical
body. Why? Because it is a physical book written by people in some natural
language in some society on earth at some period of time, and republished with
every generation. All books are placed in that bottom zone. But of course,
the meaning of the printed sentences is not part of the physical world.
That is part of the mental world of eternity where Divine Speech exists. When
Divine Speech in eternity descends to the bottom of the human mind, it is
embodied in the sentences of Sacred Scripture written in natural languages.
Divine Speech Itself is in a spiritual language, not natural language. When we
are resuscitated a few hours after we lose the physical body, we are conscious
in our spiritual mind in the mental body. In that state we talk to each other
in a universal, built in human language that is not related in any way to the
natural language we spoke. Rather, Swedenborg describes it as a rational
thought-language that is more powerful by a discrete degree than the natural
mind in which you are now reading this. This is something nice to look forward
to! Knowing this would weaken our absolutist
ties and loyalty to this or that culture or ethnic group since we know that
our ethnic or racial identity is not permanent. What is more permanent is the
quality of our feelings and what we can understand rationally. All people,
regardless of race, ethnicity, and religion, have the same mental physiology,
the same mental organs, the same substances that flow in from the Spiritual
Sun and activating the operations in the mind -- sensations, thoughts, and
feelings. No individual in the human race has something different than this.
So the idea that we lose our ethnic identity, culture, and language makes
sense rationally since these are part of the natural mind, as the chart shows.
But after resuscitation, the natural mind quickly fades into inactivity and
unconsciousness. Hence all our identity and cultural memories are shut
down.
During the course of 27 years while he was
living with both minds being conscious at the same time, Swedenborg
interviewed many people after their resuscitation (see Section xx). In the
initial stages of our resuscitation, we are still partially conscious in the
natural mind, so that we may have a continuity. Otherwise we might think that
we have been kidnapped and deposited in some mental asylum. So we have to have
our own memories of who we are and where we come from. This is the reason that
the visual appearance that others have of us in that mental state, is similar
enough to our physical body that they can recognize us if we knew each other
in the physical body. But very soon we come
to realize that we are now in an immortal mental world of eternity. We no
longer have a country, family, or place of residence. Whatever is around us is
an expression of our thoughts and feelings. The consequence of this is that
the only people we see are those who are in the same mental state as we are,
having thoughts and feelings that are compatible. We cannot see anyone whose
thoughts and feelings are not compatible with ours since our environment must
express what our mental states are like.
And if I want to see someone who is not
present, all I have to do is to put myself in a mental state that is
compatible with that person, and there is the person in front of me, and we
can interact. You can see from this, and what you will learn later, that the
laws of living are completely different in the spiritual mind, and hence,
people who wish to remain in the natural mind experience a kind of spiritual
insanity that splits their mind and prevents them from adjusting to the new
laws of life in eternity. The result is that they begin to sink into that
portion of the natural mind that remains open and active for those who keep
their consciousness in that mental zone. The chart identifies the inherited
human hells as located in the sensuous-natural zone of the mind.
But people who have developed their rational mind can make a successful
transition to the spiritual mind because the rational mind can contain
concepts from the spiritual mind. In order to develop the rational mind we had
to rely on the knowledges that arrived to us through Sacred Scripture, either
directly or indirectly (see Section xx). You can see from these considerations
that the materialistic monism of non-theistic science does not prepare people
adequately for migrating from the natural mind to the spiritual mind. But
theistic science and theistic psychology does prepare our rational mind if we
allow it to be formed solely by Sacred Scripture (see Section xx). When we read the books of Sacred Scripture
in their literal historical meaning it is our natural mind that perceives the
literal meaning and comprehends it from intelligence and education. So the
printed sentences are part of the physical world but our comprehension of
their meaning is part of the mental world. There is therefore a discrete
degree of separation between the printed sentence of Sacred Scripture in the
physical world, and the meaning of the sentence in the mental world. This
discrete separation between the two worlds of time and eternity is indicated
on the chart with the double arrows. Between them is marked the line of
eternity or mind-body dualism arranged by correspondence.
The chart indicates that the mental body (or mind) is anatomically constructed
in three discrete degrees or layers of organs and their states and operations. These three
mental organs of the natural mind are shown above the line of eternity to indicate that our mental
life is immortal right from birth, even in our natural mind. The three discrete or discontinuous levels
of the human mind are called natural, rational, and spiritual. Each of these
has quasi-discrete sub-levels, as we will study elsewhere (see Section xx).
Our conscious everyday mental world is the natural mind with its sub-levels
(e.g., the sensuous mind). Notice what the chart mentions about our natural
mind operations: conscious memory, personality, and intelligence. But there is
also a discrete sub-level that is marked on the chart as the "inherited subconscious" and the
"human hells."
See the Layers
Diagram. If someone had asked you before you read
this, where is hell, what would you have been able to say? Probably not
something very specific because this knowledge is not known to people in the
negative bias mode of thinking. However those who
read Sacred Scripture and can derive a rational coherent account from it, know
that heaven and hell are in the human mind. This is plainly revealed in the
literal meaning of the New Testament Sacred Scripture and in the Writings
Sacred Scripture. Note that the subconscious level of the mind,
and the human hells level, are both inherited. We are already familiar with the
idea in non-theistic psychology that many traits of the physical body are
inherited from parents, as well as from a long series of generations, with
inherited recessive genes that come out unpredictably in later generations.
The reason that the physical body genetically behaves this way is that it is caused
to behave this way by the mental body to which the physical body is connected
by one to one correspondence of every part from organ level to biochemical and
genetic levels. Every genetic characteristic of the physical body is caused by a
corresponding characteristic in the mental body (see Section xx).
So our natural mind has sub-conscious portions that are inherited, as well as
conscious portions that are acquired by experience. Feeling the "impulse to
avoid our obligations" is an example of an inherited hellish trait. Liking to take
revenge and enjoying being cruel against an enemy, is another example of an
inherited hellish trait. Surely you know many of them from observing your own
thoughts and impulses. Some of these thoughts shock you. Some don't shock you
and you find it difficult to get rid of, like not keeping promises to your
friends or family, or enjoying thinking unflattering things about somebody you
don't like, or cheating and stealing, or driving after drinking, etc. etc. By
the time we are young adults, and begin to be conscious of what we're like
inside of our own mind, we discover a huge number of hellish traits that we
have kept around for many years and are now practicing as habits (see Section
xx). The sub-title for Theistic Psychology is
"The Science of Immortality." People in the negative bias mode scoff at such
an idea for two reasons. First, in the past many unscientific proposals were
called by their authors as "scientific" so that the claim became empty, not
something scientists would pay attention to. The second reason is that
scientists in the negative bias mode of thinking are not capable of thinking
logically about dualism and God, as long as they deny their existence and
reality. This is obvious. So in order to investigate whether or not dualism
and God exist, they will have to adopt the positive bias in science and allow for the
possibility that God and dualism are scientific concepts. After the
investigation they may conclude that God and dualism are not scientific
concepts, but if they conclude this before the examination, it is correct to
call it their negative bias in science, not their rational judgment.
So now, from the perspective of the positive bias in science, the idea of a "science of
immortality" makes rational sense since (a) we are born immortal, and (b) God
reveals scientific facts by means of Sacred Scripture (see Section xx).
Now if you go back to the schematic anatomy of the mental body on the chart of
born to eternity discussed above, you can see
that the discrete level above the sensuous-natural mind is called the rational
mind. Theistic psychology shows that animals do not possess a rational mind.
They possess a natural-sensuous mind with which they inherit wired in
instinctive knowledge and perception, but they can also learn and adapt to
changes in the environment through memory and new habits. They can also be
taught to communicate with purpose and even use sign language and other
signaling systems
(google these topics for interesting literature on this). However they cannot
be taught to reason like human beings. By the time a human child reaches age 3
or 4, it far surpasses in reasoning ability anything any animal can do at its best. So you can
imagine the difference at age 7 or 17 or 35.
All this is because animals do not have a mental organ called the rational
mind. Hence what makes us human is not the natural mind, which we share with
animals, but the rational
mind, which only human beings have. We are born like animals with our natural mind fully functioning and
developing, containing both inherited traits and acquired traits. But we are not fully
human until our rational mind begins operating and influencing our natural
mind. Note the arrow in the chart between the rational mind and the natural
mind. The fact that it points downwards means that operations in our rational
mind influence operations in the natural mind, but not the other way around.
It is extremely important to understand this anatomical feature of our mental
body. To understand this, notice the
components listed in the rational mind: sociality, motivation, love,
rationality. These are not normally conscious to our awareness. You are
reading these sentences and what you are thinking has to do with its meaning,
not its grammar. You may or may not know that grammar (or "syntax") is a set
of rules that cause you to select certain words in a certain order that others
can then understand. People who have not been educated and have never heard of
grammar, are able to speak and understand just like the people who know
a lot about grammar. So it's not necessary to be conscious of the
grammar we acquire spontaneously by experience when we learn to a speak a language. You
can see therefore that the operations of the rational mind (higher level),
such as human syntax and human rationality, operate without our awareness in
order to make possible the operations we perform at a lower level (natural
mind) and of which we are fully conscious. We can think logically and rationally in our natural mind only because
our rational mind is controlling it by correspondence. Animals cannot think
logically and rationally in their natural mind because they do not have a
rational mind to control its performance. Now
notice what is above the rational mind. This is the highest level of mental
operation and consciousness possible for human beings. It is called the
spiritual mind and itself has several discrete sub-levels. The main levels are
the spiritual mind itself, and the celestial mind which is within the
spiritual, or above it. The human heavens are located in that portion of the
mental body called the spiritual and the celestial mind. The human heavens in
the spiritual mind is called the Second Heaven which operates with spiritual-rational consciousness. The human heavens in the celestial mind is called the
Third Heaven which operates with celestial-rational consciousness (see
Section xx). Now notice what is above the
spiritual-celestial mind, thus above the human heavens: Good and Truth from
Divine Speech proceeding from the Spiritual Sun, which is the visible aura
that surrounds God the Divine Human, as seen several times by Swedenborg when
he ascended to that region of the human mind (see Section xx). He reports that
the Spiritual Sun and the Divine Human appear visually to every person who
consciously dwells in the highest region of their mind. Amazingly, whichever way they turn
in their heavenly environment the vision of the Spiritual Sun and the Divine
Human remains in front of them! (see Section xx) This will become
understandable to you when you begin to examine how our mental body moves
around in eternity (see Section xx). So now
we have reviewed together the components of the chart from top to bottom. We
need to point out some its overall characteristics. Note this most important
fact about the chart: The very top of it, or its Firsts, creates, causes,
directs, and rules every step below it through intermediate steps, and the
last step at the bottom is the physical world, which may therefore be called
its Lasts. So God creates and manages the universe from Firsts through
Lasts, in corresponding discrete degrees. Nothing is left out, all of it
determined by God from start to finish.
Note also that the mental body is constructed out of mental organs arranged in
discrete levels, the level above controlling the level below by
correspondence. Since God creates and manages all things in the universe
by means of the laws of correspondences, the revelation of what these
correspondences are now gives science the ability for the first time in
history, to understand how mental things control physical things in the entire
universe at all levels (see Section xx). You can see this clearly form the
chart. The physical world and its phenomena are at the bottom of the chain of
correspondences from God to the natural mind. God creates and maintains the
phenomena in the physical world through the human mind and its layers from top
down. (See the
Layers Diagram.) This may seem fantastic to you! And yet it is true, and the study of
theistic psychology can proves it to your rational understanding.
Theism in science tries to show through a rational and scientific account, how
God manages the universe through the mental world of eternity and by means of
the laws of correspondences between the physical and the mental (see Section
xx). These laws
constitute built-in relationships from creation and cannot be altered. Now they have
been revealed to humanity through the Writings Sacred Scripture written by
Swedenborg (see Section xx). The laws of correspondences discovered by Swedenborg forms the
scientific basis for theistic psychology and all of theistic science (see
Section xx). Keep studying the diagram called
"born into eternity" discussed in this Section. Start thinking of people and
of yourself in those terms and from that perspective. Give yourself the
opportunity to see something new that you can understand rationally. Try
thinking of the up-down direction of the chart as arranged in concentric
figures:

This diagram portrays the anatomy of a human being viewed in
simultaneous order of discrete degrees, while the first chart called "born
into eternity" and discussed above, portrays the successive order of
discrete degrees that make up a human being. The successive order is usually
portrayed as a top-down chart, while the
simultaneous order is portrayed as
concentric circles. What is at the top, or beginning, in the successive
series, becomes the inmost in the simultaneous series, and what was at
the bottom of the successive series, now becomes the external of the entire
construct.
Picturing this diagram in your understanding
will help you have theistic x-ray vision, so to speak, when you are looking at
your friend or any stranger, or looking at yourself in the mirror. You can
say: This is me. I am immortal. I am looking at my external parts, which is my
temporary physical body in time-space. But with my theistic psychology x-ray
vision, as shown in this diagram, I can see rationally within myself. Within
my physical body is my natural mind -- not physically within, but a discrete
degree within. My natural mind corresponds to the input from my physical body.
But my natural mind would not be human and rational unless it is made to
operate in correspondence with my rational mind, which is a discrete degree
within my natural mind. The correspondence action of the my rational mind upon
my natural mind, keeps my natural mind operating rationally so that I don't
have to be limited in my thinking to what I see sensuously through my senses.
I can think abstractly about the sensuous mind, constructing rational accounts
that order the sensuous mind into a rational logic. All this is accomplished
by the fact that the natural mind is created to be in correspondence with the
rational mind. The diagram also tells me that
my rational mind operates with a rational logic because it corresponds to the
spiritual mind, which remains unconscious to our awareness until after my
physical body dies. My spiritual mind is the mental organ that contains the
human heavens in eternity. And the only reason my spiritual mind can
contain the human heavens is that the spiritual mind is created to correspond
to good and truth flowing in from the Spiritual Sun that appears around God
the Divine Human (see Section xx). There you
have it. You can now look into a human being from the external portion to the
inmost portion. Later, as you begin to learn more and more about how each of
these levels operate in your mind, you will realize how everything is
integrated into a rational order that our mind can understand. God wants us to
understand rationally the reality He has created for our sake, and is
maintaining for our evolution into eternity. The true human life is in the
spiritual mind, which is why all the portions of the mind below it are put to
sleep and rendered inoperative. Once we are in eternity, all we need is the
organ that contains heaven.
But sadly perhaps, a substantial portion of
the human race in eternity -- which is of course immense by now -- does not
dwell in their spiritual mind where heaven is, but in their natural-sensuous
mind where hell is. There is nothing rational whatsoever in the thoughts and
feelings we have in the hells of our mind. We are spiritually insane in our
immortality if we maintain ourselves in that mental state out of our free
choice (see Section xx). God always honors our free choices, so that if we
prefer hellish feelings we can have that too in our immortality. So the
spiritual mind which is the highest rational mind we can have, is shut down
for them, and they dwell in the interior portions of their natural mind,
living insanely, pitifully, and inhumanly (see Section xx).
Quoting from the Writings Sacred Scripture:
Note: The following transformation Table
will help you understand the quoted paragraphs in terms of theistic psychology
concepts. It will also illustrate for you the relationship between the literal
sense of Sacred Scripture, which is intended for religion, and the spiritual
scientific meaning that is hidden within it, but can be extracted from it by
appropriate methods of extraction (see Section xx). Study both sides of the
conversion table until you are able to reproduce them by memory.
LITERAL SENSE OF THE
WRITINGS SACRED SCRIPTURE
(for religion) |
EXTRACTED SPIRITUAL SCIENTIFIC SENSE
(for theistic psychology and science) |
| the Lord |
God, the Divine Psychologist present in the mind of every
human being (see Section xx) |
** the Word;
** whatever stands in the literal or natural sense of the Word, enfolds
and stands for something spiritual;
** every detail of the literal sense of the Word contains a correspondential sense. |
** Sacred Scripture, Divine Speech, Doctrine of Truth,
Scientific Revelations;
** theistic psychology as the spiritual scientific sense of Sacred
Scripture that is extracted by the method prescribed in the Writings
Sacred Scripture (see Section xx) |
| his body, natural, material |
physical body in time and space (see Section xx) |
| his soul, spirit, spiritual, spiritual body, his internal man |
our mental organs and mental body or mind, which is born
in eternity (see Section xx) |
** to correspond;
** natural-spiritual correspondences; ** permanent correspondence between
the natural and spiritual events in a person's life
** the spiritual body has to be formed in the material one
** there is something more interior which thinks and wills of which
the body is the instrumental or material organ |
cause-effect relationship between mental or spiritual
events in eternity (cause) vs. natural or physical events in time-space
(effect) (see Section xx);
** our mental body is born in eternity while the physical body is born in
time, and the two until our death, are temporarily connected by the laws
of correspondence (see Section xx)
** the mental body is "within" the physical body, not in terms of space,
but in terms of discrete degrees
** the mental body causes the physical body to operate the way it does,
including its anatomy, physiology, biochemistry, and genetics |
** process of regeneration;
** regeneration is on the model of a person's conception, gestation in the
womb, birth
** a truth which is to be instilled into good |
** character reformation efforts in daily willing
(affective organ) and thinking (cognitive organ)
** to make our willing and thinking conform to our rational understanding
of theistic psychology;
** this prepares and enables our highest or heavenly mental organs to
operate our immortal life in eternity
** without this lifelong preparation or character reformation, our life of
immortality is restricted to our lowest mental organs called the hells
(see Section xx) |
** material body laid aside;
** the world where all things are spiritual;
** separation from the body
** the angels in heaven are from the human race |
** death or separation from our physical body in
time-space, which is followed a few hours later by conscious resuscitation
in the mental world of eternity where we are co-present with all other
human beings that were ever born anywhere (see Section xx)
** when we start our conscious life in the immortality of our rational
mental organs, we receive the tile of heavenly spirits or angels, or
conjugial angel couples (see Section xx)
** or else, we start our immortality in our corporeal mental organs, and
we are then called devils, satans, dragons, sirens, and genii, depending
on our evil or rationally insane character (see Section xx) |
| a process accomplished by the inflow of truths and various kinds of
good from the Lord through the spiritual world |
from the Spiritual Sun in eternity there inflow into every
human being's mental organs two immortal substances called spiritual light
-- or Divine Truth, inflowing into our cognitive organ, and spiritual heat
-- or Divine Good, inflowing into our affective organ (see Section xx)
|
| this is not evident to him in his lifetime because of the obscurity,
indeed the thick darkness brought about by earthly, physical, and worldly
things |
** while we are still connected to the physical body we
are conscious in the natural mind which takes all its content from the
physical environment through the sensory organs
** at death and resuscitation, our natural mind gradually becomes
unconscious and we then live our conscious immortality in our spiritual
mind, which until death remains unconscious (except for Swedenborg from
age 57 to 84) (see Section xx) |
| the man cares nothing for heaven, for he then thinks of himself as he
does of the brute animals |
our natural mind is in the negative bias mode of thinking
until we allow it to acquire and develop rational concepts in the positive
bias mode of thinking, such as the study of theistic psychology for the
purpose of character reformation (see Section xx) |
Now here are sections from
several Numbers:
TCR 583. IV The process of regeneration is
on the model of a person's conception, gestation in the womb, birth and
upbringing.
The natural and spiritual events in a person's life, that is, what happens
to his body and what to his spirit, are so ordered as permanently to
correspond. The reason is that a person is by birth spiritual as regards his
soul, and he is clothed with a natural form which is constituted by his
material body. When therefore this is laid aside, his soul, clothed in his
spiritual body, comes into the world where all things are spiritual, and
there associates with people like him.
Now the spiritual body has to be formed in
the material one, a process accomplished by the inflow of truths and various
kinds of good from the Lord through the spiritual world. These are inwardly
received by the person in such things belonging to the natural world as are
called civil and moral; so it is evident how the process of formation takes
place. Because, as already said, there is a permanent correspondence between
the natural and spiritual events in a person's life, it follows that this
process must resemble his conception, gestation in the womb, birth and
upbringing.
That is why natural births in the Word
mean spiritual births, that is, the birth of good and truth. For whatever
stands in the literal or natural sense of the Word, enfolds and stands for
something spiritual. I demonstrated fully in the chapter on the Sacred
Scripture that every detail of the literal sense of the Word contains a
correspondential sense. (TCR 583) AC 3342 Such
things also exist within man - for man is a spirit clothed with the body -
as becomes clear from the fact that when anything spoken that is perceived
by the ear rises up towards the more interior parts, it passes into mental
images not unlike those of visual objects, and from these into conceptual
ideas, and in this way one comes to perceive the sense of the words. Anyone
who reflects on these matters properly may recognize from them that within
him there is his spirit, which is his internal man, and also that he has
this kind of ability to communicate following his separation from the body,
for the same ability exists with him though this is not evident to him in
his lifetime because of the obscurity, indeed the thick darkness brought
about by earthly, physical, and worldly things. (AC 3342)
AC 1970. By genuine visions are meant visions or sights of such things in
the other life as have real existence, and are nothing but actual things
that can be seen by the eyes of the spirit and not by the eyes of the body,
and that appear to a man when his interior sight is opened by the Lord (that
is, the sight which his spirit has), and into which he comes when, separated
from the body, he passes into the other life; for a man is a spirit clothed
with a body. Such were the visions of the prophets. When this sight is
opened, then those things which have actual existence with spirits are seen
in clearer day than that of noon in this world, not only the
representatives, but also the spirits themselves, together with a perception
of who they are, also what they are, where they are, whence they come,
whither they are going; also of what affection, what persuasion, nay of what
faith they are (n. 1388, 1394), all confirmed by living speech, exactly as
if it were human speech, and this free from all fallacy. (AC 1970)
AC 4364. Take as another example the truth that man is a spirit, and that he
is clothed with a body while he lives in the world. This also is a truth
which is to be instilled into good; for unless it has been so instilled, the
man cares nothing for heaven, for he then thinks of himself as he does of
the brute animals.
But this truth cannot be instilled except
by means of special things, as by these-that the body which he carries about
serves for uses in this world, namely, that he may see the things that are
in the world with material eyes, and may act by material muscles, thereby
having powers that are adapted to the heavy things in the world; and that
nevertheless there is something more interior which thinks and wills of
which the body is the instrumental or material organ; and that a man's
spirit is himself, or the man himself, who acts and feels through these
organic forms; and that he can confirm this by many of his own experiences
if he is once in the belief that the case is so. (AC 4364)
HH 453. MAN AFTER DEATH IS IN A COMPLETE HUMAN FORM
It can be confirmed from things already shown in several previous sections
that the form of the spirit of man is the human form, that is, that the
spirit is a man even in form, especially where it is shown that every angel
is in a complete human form (n. 73-77); that in respect of his interiors
every man is a spirit (n. 432-444); and that the angels in heaven are from
the human race (n. 311-317).
[2] This can be seen still more clearly
from the fact that it is by virtue of his spirit, and not by virtue of his
body, that man is a man, and that the corporeal form is added to the spirit
in accordance with the spirit's form, and not the reverse, for it is in
accordance with its own form that the spirit is clothed with a body.
Consequently, the spirit of man acts into every part of the body, even the
minutest, insomuch that if any part is not actuated by the spirit, or the
spirit is not active in it, it does not live. Anyone can know that this is
true from this fact alone, that thought and will actuate all things and each
thing of the body with such entire command that everything concurs, and
anything that does not concur is not a part of the body, but is cast out as
something without life; and thought and will belong, not to the body, but to
the spirit of man.
[3] A spirit is not visible in the human
form to man after it has been loosed from the body, nor does he see the
spirit in another man, because the body's organ of sight, or its eye, so far
as it sees in the world, is a material organ, and what is material can see
only what is material, while what is spiritual sees what is spiritual. When,
therefore, the material part of the eye becomes darkened and is deprived of
its co-operation with the spiritual, then the spirits appear in their own
form, which is the human form, not only the spirits who are in the spiritual
world, but also the spirit of another man while it is yet in its body. (HH
453)
Study
Questions: 1.0 to 1.0.1.2.2 (Report 1)
Week 3 Readings: Section 1.0 to 1.0.1.2.1
-
Student 1: 1, 4, 7
-
Student 2: 2, 5, 8
-
Student 3: 3, 6, 9
3.1.
(a) Describe your educational experience regarding the positive and negative
bias in science.
(b) Describe your reaction to what this week's readings say about
science education.
3.2.
(a) Describe your reaction to discovering that you are a dual citizen.
(b) Is this
difficult for you to go along with as part of the positive bias in science?
(c) Describe the reaction of your friends or family with whom you discussed the
course.
3.3.
(a) Give a description of the anatomy of a human being viewed in the positive
bias in science as a dual citizen.
(b) How is this anatomy different from the anatomy you learned before?
(c) Describe your reaction to this new knowledge.
3.4.
(a) Explain the idea that there is only one mental world in the human race.
(b) How was this proven by Swedenborg?
(c) What are the potential consequences of this
discovery for you and society once it becomes known?
3.5.
(a) What does it mean that we are "born into eternity"?
(b) How does this relate
to God and the afterlife?
(c) How does it relate to the anatomy of our mental world?
3.6.
(a) Describe the correspondential relationship between the physical body and the mental body.
(b) How do they work together?
(c) How do you react to learning these facts about
yourself?
3.7.
(a) Explain the relationship between Divine Speech and human minds. You'll
need to include the concepts of "Spiritual Sun" and "spiritual substances."
(b) How do your friends react to the existence of a Spiritual Sun in eternity?
3.8.
(a) Explain the answer to "Where are you?" as viewed from the perspective of
"substantive dualism."
(b) Try to teach this idea to your friends. What success did you have?
3.9.
(a) How would you prove that you are immortal? Think about it by reflecting on
the new concepts in this week's readings. Make a list. Be sure you can define
them to your own rational comprehension.
(b) Now present the proof to a friend or
two.
(c) Describe their reactions and arguments.
(d) How do you interpret what happened?
1.0.1.2.2
Male Mind, Female Mind, and Conjoint Mind
Quoting from the Writings Sacred Scripture:
CL 193. (8) A woman is actually
transformed into a wife according to the description in the book of
creation. We are told in this book that woman was created from the rib of a
man, and that when she was brought to him, the man said,
She...is bone of my bones and flesh
of my flesh; she shall be called 'Ishshah (Woman) because she was taken
from 'Ish (Man). (Genesis 2:22-24)
In the Word, a rib from the breast
symbolically means, in its spiritual sense, not a rib but natural truth.
This is the symbolism of the ribs which the bear carried between its teeth
in Daniel 7:5; for bears symbolize people who read the Word in its natural
sense and see truths there without understanding. The breast of a man
symbolizes that essential and distinctive quality which makes it different
in character from the breast of a woman. This quality is wisdom, as may be
seen above in no. 187; for truth supports wisdom, as a rib supports the
breast. These distinctive qualities are symbolized, because the breast is
where all the qualities of a person are, so to speak, at their center.
[2] It follows from this that woman was
created from man by a transmission and replication of his distinctive
wisdom, which is formed from natural truth, and that man's love for this
wisdom was transferred to woman so as to become conjugial love; moreover,
that the purpose of this was to replace love of self in man with love for
his wife, who, from a nature innate in her, cannot help but turn the love of
self in man to his love for her. I have been told, too, that this comes
about as a result of the wife's love, without either the man or the wife
being conscious of it. It is because of this that no one is ever able to
love his partner with a truly conjugial love so long as he is possessed of a
conceit in his own intelligence from a love of self.
[3] Once this secret of the creation of
woman from man has been understood, it can be seen that in marriage a woman
is similarly created or formed, so to speak, from her husband, and that this
transformation is brought about by the wife - or rather, through the wife by
the Lord, who infuses into women the inclination to achieve it. For a wife
receives into her an image of her husband by assimilating his affections
into her (see above, no. 173); by uniting the internal will of her husband
with hers (concerning which below); and also by incorporating into her the
propagations of his soul (of which also below).
It is apparent from this that a woman is
transformed into a wife according to the description in the book of creation
understood in respect to its inner meaning, and that she is transformed
through the qualities she takes from her husband and his "breast" and
implants in herself. (CL 193) CL 194. (9)
This transformation is accomplished by the wife in secret ways, which is
what is meant by woman's having been created while the man slept. We read in
the book of creation that Jehovah God caused a deep sleep to fall on Adam so
that he slept, and that He then took one of the man's ribs and fashioned it
into a woman (Genesis 2:21,22). This sleep and the man's sleeping symbolize
a man's complete ignorance that his wife is transformed and, so to speak,
created from him. This is apparent from observations made in the preceding
chapter, and also in this one, respecting wives' innate discretion and
prudence not to divulge anything of their love, not even of their adopting
their husband's life's affections and of their thus transfusing his wisdom
into them.
It is clear from what we presented before
in nos. 166-168ff that a wife does this without her husband's knowing and
while he is, so to speak, asleep, thus that she does it in secret ways. We
also showed in the same numbers that the prudence needed to accomplish it is
instinctive in women from creation, thus from birth, for reasons that are
necessary in building conjugial love, friendship and trust, so that the two
may have bliss in living together and happiness of life.
In order that this may come about as
it should, therefore, it was enjoined on man that he leave father and
mother and cling to his wife (Genesis 2:24, Matthew 19:4,5). [Old and
New Testament Sacred Scripture]
[2] The father and mother a man is to
leave mean, in a spiritual sense, the inherent nature of his will and the
inherent nature of his intellect (the inherent nature of a person's will
being to love itself, and the inherent nature of a person's intellect being
to love its own wisdom). And to cling means to commit himself to love of
his wife. These two inherent natures are evil and deadly to a man if
they remain in him, but the love arising from the two is turned into
conjugial love as a man clings to his wife, that is, as he acquires a love
for her, as may be seen just above in no. 193, and elsewhere.
(It can be amply demonstrated from
passages elsewhere in the Word that to be asleep symbolically means to be
unaware or oblivious; that father and mother symbolically mean the two
inherent natures of a person, one of the will and one of the intellect; and
that to cling symbolically means to commit oneself to love for something.
But it would be out of place to do it here.)
CL 195. (10) This transformation is
accomplished by the wife by a union of her will with the inner will of her
husband. It may be seen above in nos. 163-165 that a man has an
intellectual wisdom and a moral wisdom, and that a wife unites herself
with those qualities in her husband that have to do with his moral wisdom.
Qualities that are matters of intellectual wisdom form a man's
understanding, and qualities that are matters of moral wisdom form his will.
A wife unites herself with those qualities which form her husband's will.
(Whether one says that a wife unites herself, or that she unites her will,
with the will of her husband, it amounts to the same thing, because a
wife is born will-oriented, and therefore she does what she does in accord
with her will.)
We say that it is a union with her
husband's inner will, because a man's will has its seat in his intellect,
and the intellectual quality of man is the inmost quality in woman,
in accordance with observations we have made before, in no. 32 and several
times since, regarding the formation of woman from man. Men also have an
outward will, but this very frequently comes of pretense or concealment.
A wife sees it, but she does not unite herself with it, except perhaps in
a feigned or playful way. (CL 195) CL
196. (11) This to the end that the will of the one and the will of the
other may become one will, and the two partners thus one person. This is
the goal, for anyone who joins the will of another to himself also
joins to himself the other's intellect. Indeed, regarded in itself,
the intellect is only a servant and agent of the will. The fact of
this is clearly apparent from the way an affection arising from love impels
the intellect to think as it bids. Every affection arising from love is a
property of the will, for what a person loves, this he also wills.
It follows from this that anyone who
joins the will of another person to himself, joins to himself the whole
person. That is why it is instinctive in a wife's love to unite her
husband's will to her own, for in this way the wife becomes one who
belongs to her husband, and the husband one who belongs to his wife.
Thus the two become one person. (CL 196)
CL 197. (12) This transformation is accomplished by an adoption of the
husband's affections. This point goes along with the two preceding
discussions, since affections are matters of the will. For affections are
simply the offspring of love, and they form the will, molding it and
composing it. In men, however, these affections reside in the intellect,
whereas in women they reside in the will. (CL 197)
CL 198. (13) This transformation is accomplished by the wife by her
reception of the propagations of her husband's soul with delight - a delight
arising from her willing to be an embodiment of love for her husband's
wisdom. Since this accords with points already explained before in nos.
172, 173, further explanation is omitted here.
In wives, conjugial delights take their
rise from no other source than their willing to be united with their
husbands, as good is united with truth in a marriage of these on the plane
of the spirit. We separately showed in its own chapter that conjugial love
descends from this marriage.* It can be seen in consequence, as though in a
mirror, that a wife joins her husband to her as good joins truth to it; also
that a husband joins himself to his wife in return according to his
reception of her love in him, as truth joins itself to good in return,
according to its reception of good in it. Thus it can be seen that a wife's
love takes form through the wisdom of her husband, as good takes form
through truth; for truth is what gives form to good.
It is apparent from this as well, then,
that conjugial delights in a wife come principally from her willing to be
united with her husband, consequently from her willing to be an embodiment
of love for her husband's wisdom. For she then feels the delights of her
warmth in the light of her husband, as explained under heading (4), nos.
188, 189. (CL 198) CL 199 (14) A maiden is
thus transformed into a wife, and a youth into a husband. This follows as a
consequence from what we have already said in this and the previous chapter
respecting the union of married partners into one flesh.
A maiden turns or is turned into a wife because a wife has elements in her
taken from her husband, thus elements acquired which did not exist in her
before as an unmarried woman. A youth turns or is turned into a husband
because a husband has elements in him taken from his wife, which heighten
the capacity in him for receiving love and wisdom, elements which did not
exist in him before as an unmarried man. However, this is the case with
people who are in a state of truly conjugial love. Among them are some who
feel as though they are a united person and virtually one flesh (as may be
seen in the preceding chapter, no. 178).
It is apparent from this that a maidenly
state is transformed into a wifely one in women, and a youthful state into a
husbandly one in men.
[2] I was convinced of the fact of this
from the following experience in the spiritual world:
Some men said that the relationship a man
has with a woman before marriage and the relationship he has with his wife
after marriage are similar. When they heard this, their wives became very
offended and said, "They are not at all alike! The difference is as the
difference between fantasy and reality."
To this the men retorted, "Are you not
women as before?" To which their wives responded with rising voice, "We are
not 'women' but wives! The love you feel is a fantasy love and not a real
one; therefore you speak in fantasy terms."
The men then said, "If you are not
'women,' still you are married women." But they replied, "In the early days
of marriage we were married women; now, however, we are wives." (CL 199)
CL 200. (15) In a marriage of one man with one wife, in which there is a
truly conjugial love between them, the wife becomes more and more a wife,
and the husband more and more a husband. It may be seen above in nos. 177,
178, that truly conjugial love joins two partners more and more into one
person. So, because a wife becomes a wife by union with her husband and
according to that union, likewise a husband a husband by union with his wife
and according to it, and because truly conjugial love lasts to eternity,
it follows that a wife becomes more and more a wife, and a husband more and
more a husband.
The fundamental reason for this is that in
a marriage of truly conjugial love, each partner becomes more and more
deeply human, for that love opens the deeper aspects of their minds,
and as these are opened, a person becomes more and more human. To
become more human is, on the part of a wife, to become more a wife; and on
the part of a husband, to become more a husband.
I have heard from angels that a wife
becomes more and more a wife as her husband becomes more and more a husband;
however, not so much the reverse. The reason, they said, is that a chaste
wife rarely if ever fails to love her husband, but what fails is her being
loved by her husband in return. They also said that this failure is
attributable to a lack of elevation in his wisdom, which alone receives
the love of a wife. (Respecting this wisdom, see nos. 130, 163-165.) But
this they said in reference to marriages on earth. (CL 200)
CL 201. (16) Their forms are also thus progressively perfected and ennobled
from within. The human form is most perfect and most noble when by
marriage two forms become one form, thus when the flesh of two becomes one
flesh, in accordance with the story of their creation. The
husband's mind is then elevated into a higher light, and the wife's
mind into a higher warmth, and they then burgeon, blossom and bear fruit,
like trees in springtime (as may be seen above in nos. 188, 189).
We will see in the discussion that follows
next that the ennobling of this form results in the birth of noble fruits -
spiritual fruits in heaven, natural fruits on earth. (CL 201)
Study the following anatomical charts of
single and married men and women. Try to memorize them. It's a good idea to
print the charts so you can have in front of you as you read the discussion
that follows the charts. Look at the charts frequently as you read the
paragraphs. This will make it it meaningful and satisfying. You will be able
to avoid confusion or obscurity and vagueness in your mind. All this should be
crystal clear, which is why the charts are provided to you.
A man's mind is
the converse of a woman's mind. The human mind contains affective and
cognitive organs at various levels and relative functions (see Section xx). In
a man's natural mind the affective organ is located inwardly relative to the
cognitive organ, but the converse is the case with a woman's natural mind --
her affective organ is located outwardly relative to her cognitive organ. This
is portrayed in the diagram below. But note that with
the spiritual mind, man's affective organ is inmost relative to his
cognitive organ, and the converse is the case with a woman's spiritual mind --
the cognitive organ is inmost relative to the affective organ. Make sure you
locate this difference on the chart so you can memorize it.

Now what happens when a man and a woman are conjoined mentally by the
acceptance of marriage as a spiritual or eternal union (see Section
11.4.10.1). When husband and wife live their married life according to this
principle of eternal union, their thoughts and feelings become interdependent
or conjoined. A new mental organ is created out of the husband and wife, which
is called the conjoint self (see Section 11.4.11). The following chart shows
this process of conjoining in two stages. Start from the bottom:

The first stage is called the external marriage. The conjoint
self is built up from the husband's external cognitive organ in the natural
mind, which receives the substance of external truth from his
unconscious spiritual mind. His reception of external truth is conjoined with
the wife's external affective organ in her natural mind, which receives the
substance of external good. This shows that a wife and a husband are
totally different in the physiological composition of the conscious natural
mind. Nothing in a man's mind can be like anything in a woman's mind, and
vice versa. The logical consequence of this is that nothing in a man's
physical body can be like anything in a woman's physical body, and vice versa.
Why? because there is a correspondence between the mental body and the
physical body (see Section xx). Modern medicine is slowly coming to the
realization that drug and health research on men are not directly applicable
to women, hence more and more research effort is allocated to woman's
medicine, reversing the earlier trend of exclusive male medicine.
Unless the mental body of a man
and a woman were completely reciprocals of each other, full and total
conjunction between them would not be possible, hence the human heavens would
not be possible because these are built within the conjoint self of a married
couple.
This is worth repeating, so
important it is for you to know it and take into account when you are thinking
about yourself and your relationships in the positive bias in science mode. Full and
total conjunction, or unity marriage, is possible between the husband and the
wife because their mental bodies are constructed as anatomical reciprocal of
each other. This is the principle of unity through differentiation and
reciprocity (see Section 11.3.2). The consequence of this physiological
difference is that a man and a woman may think of the same thing, and yet not
have the same meaning -- which may lead to issues in communication (see
Section xx). It is the same with emotions like fear, pleasure, anger, loyalty,
etc. -- each is different in a man's mind as compared to a woman's mind. They
may use the same dictionary definition and pass the same SAT exams -- yet
women and men will have reciprocal meanings for words and things. They overlap
enough for external communication, but not enough for internal communication,
which is called mental intimacy (see Section xx). The husband achieves mental
intimacy with his wife in proportion his willingness to align his thinking
operations in the cognitive organ, with the wife's willing operations or
states in the affective organ -- as you can see portrayed from the chart
above, Stage 1.
The second stage is
called the internal marriage. The internal conjoint self is built up
from the wife's internal cognitive organ (thinking operations), which receives
the substance of internal truth from her spiritual mind -- conjoined
with the husband's internal cognitive organ, which receives the substance of
internal truth from his spiritual mind (see chart).
To summarize (try memorizing
this):
Mental conjunction between a
husband and a wife always involves an affective and a cognitive organ. In the
external marriage, this conjunction involves the natural mind (Stage 1) by
means of external truth in the husband's cognitive organ and external good in
the wife's affective organ. In the internal marriage, this conjunction
involves the spiritual mind (Stage 2) by means of internal truth in the wife's
cognitive organ and internal good in the husband's affective organ. When the
internal marriage is functional and operative, the external marriage is an
external correspondence of the internal marriage. The couple is then in the
unity model of marriage (see Section 11.3).
What is external truth and good
in the natural mind vs. internal good and truth in the spiritual mind?
Remember that good and truth are
spiritual substances streaming out from the Spiritual sun around the God the
Divine Human (see Section xx). Remember also that the mental organs are
constructed to function as receptors of spiritual light (cognitive organ) and
spiritual heat (affective organ). These substances then inflow and are
received differently by a man ad a woman since their mental body physiology is
reciprocal and differentiated (see Section xx). This is like sunlight from our
sun entering different sorts of plants. It is the same sunlight, and heat
within it, but each plant does something different with it, according to its
genetic species. This occurs because the operations in the physical body are
correspondences of their causes in the mental body.
Since women receive spiritual
heat and light differently relative to each other, and in a reciprocal or
converse manner relative to men, you can see that the consequence of this
physiology is that a woman's mental operations will be differentiated from a
man's mental operations.
The realization of these
anatomical differences between the mental body of men and women will help
couples to understand rationally what they must be willing to do in order to
achieve a conjoint self in an internal marriage that will last to eternity or
never end. Both the husband and the woman must be willing to grow into new
selves that are no longer independent mentally. This is the conjoint self. The
heaven of eternity is constructed out of this conjoint self. That is, the
conjugial human heavens are built within this conjoint self, just as your
heart and lungs are built within your physical body. This would be equivalent
to being joined twins, as with some unusual births. Imagine they have only one
circulatory system and only one respiratory system.
In the mental body of the
celestial couple in a unity marriage, the husband's affective organ is
conjoined with the wife's cognitive organ. This unity shows both here on
earth through the conscious natural mind and in eternity through the spiritual
mind. Here on earth, the internal marriage shows externally by the observable
harmony, agreement, and inmost friendship that the two married lovers and soul
mates have for each other, with never an exception. Swedenborg reports that in
the world of the afterlife, this harmony between a wife and her husband shows
itself by a beautiful visual phenomenon: When a husband and wife are seen from
a distance, only one angel walking is seen, but when they draw near, a husband
and a wife angel couple are seen.
Also, when Swedenborg was having
a conversation with some angel husbands in their conjugial heavens, they
showed him that the wife of each was present, though not visible to
Swedenborg's eyes. When the wife of one of the husbands became visible to him,
Swedenborg saw on her facial expression whatever the husband was taking about,
so intimate was their mental union. In that state of conjugial heaven, it is
not possible for a man to think of something without his wife's willing also
be involved. Hence he could not think anything that is disagreeable to the
wife. When a couple here on earth is committed to reaching a unity
relationship, the husband can think less and less that which his wife would
disapprove of.
Women inherit a mental body that
is powerfully oriented toward external conjunction with a man they select for
that purpose through affections and love for him. As the chart shows in Stage
1, the woman wills to conjoin her willing (affective organ) with the husband's
thinking (cognitive organ). In this process (Stage 1), the woman leads and
prompts and urges. She learns this as a girl, socialized to become a man's
"helper" and "mate." She learns the skills of taking care of men -- father,
brother, boyfriend, boss, children. A girl friend quickly learns and acquires
her boyfriend's way of thinking about many things they share together. During
Stage 1, the man cruises in the relationship, almost taking a passive role and
enjoying all his male prerogatives like being served and taken care of in many
ways he enjoys. Now in order for the marriage to become mentally intimate and
move on to Stage 2, the husband has to take the lead by willing himself to
conjoin his wife's internal truth, rationality, and wisdom, to his internal
love or good. It is out of this union that the conjugial heavens are built for
their eternal happiness and bliss (see Section xx). If the man is unwilling to
do this, the marriage cannot go on to Stage 2. As a result, they will not be
together in the afterlife.
Swedenborg reports that women
who remain in an external marriage here on earth because their husband is
unwilling, are given to meet a suitable man after resuscitation.
Quoting from the Writings Sacred
Scripture:
CL 56. The Second Memorable
Relation:
Once, while talking with angels in the world of spirits, I was inspired with
a pleasant desire to see the Temple of Wisdom which I had seen once before;*
and I asked them the way. They said, "Follow the light and you will find
it." I said, "What do you mean by "Follow the light"?" and they said: "Our
light shines more and more brightly as we draw nearer to that temple.
Therefore, follow the light according to the increase of its brightness; for
our light proceeds from the Lord as a Sun, and hence, considered in itself,
is wisdom."
Then, walking in company with
two angels, I followed the increasing brightness of the light and ascended
by a steep path to the summit of a hill which lay in the southern quarter.
There was a magnificent gate there. Seeing the angels with me, the keeper
opened it and, lo, there was seen an avenue of palm trees and laurels, and
along this we walked. It was a winding avenue and terminated in a garden in
the midst of which was the TEMPLE OF WISDOM. As I looked around me, I saw
also small buildings, similar to the temple, and in them were wise men. We
approached one of these buildings and, at the entrance, spoke to the host
there and told him the reason of our coming and the manner of our approach.
He then said, "Welcome; come in; be seated and let us join together in
discourse on wisdom.:
[2] Within the house, I saw
that it was divided into two and yet was one. It was divided into two by a
transparent partition; and it seemed to be one because of the transparency
of the partition which was as though of purest crystal. I asked why this was
the case. He said, "I am not alone. My wife is with me; and we are two and
yet not two but one flesh."
I then said, "I know that you
are a wise man, but what has a wise man or wisdom to do with woman?" At this
our host, with some indignation, changed countenance. He then stretched out
his hand and, lo, from neighboring houses other wise men were present. To
these, he said jestingly, "Our new-comer here, for the purpose of learning,
asks what a wise man or wisdom has to do with woman?" At this they all
laughed and said, "What is a wise man or wisdom without woman, that is,
without love? The wife is the love of a wise man's wisdom."
[3] Our host then said, "Let
us now join together in some discourse on wisdom. Let the discourse be
concerning causes, and for the present concerning the cause of the beauty of
the female sex." They then spoke in turn. The first gave this as the cause:
"Women were created, by the Lord, affections of the wisdom of men; and the
affection of wisdom is beauty itself." A second gave this: "Woman was
created by the Lord through the wisdom of man because from man. Hence, being
a form of wisdom inspired with the affection of love, and the affection of
love being life itself, woman is the life of wisdom. The male is wisdom, and
the life of wisdom is beauty." A third gave this: "To women is given a
perception of the delights of conjugial love; and because their whole body
is an organ of that perception, it cannot be otherwise than that the abode
of the delights of conjugial love with its perception is beauty."
[4] A fourth gave this: "The
Lord has taken the beauty and grace of life from man and transcribed them
into woman. Hence, without reunion with his beauty and grace in woman, a man
is stern, austere, dry, and unlovely; nor is he wise save for himself alone,
and then he is stupid. But when man is united with his beauty and grace of
life in his wife, he becomes agreeable, pleasant, animated, and lovely, and
thus wise." A fifth gave this: "Women are created beauties for the sake not
of themselves but of men, that men, of themselves hard, may be softened;
that their minds, of themselves severe, may become mild, and their hearts,
of themselves cold, warm; and they do become such when they become one flesh
with their wives."
[5] A sixth gave this: "The
universe was created by the Lord a most perfect work; but in that universe
nothing was created more perfect than woman, beautiful in face and graceful
in manners; and this to the end that man may render thanks to the Lord for
this bounty, and may repay it by the reception of wisdom from Him.
After these and many like
sentiments had been expressed, the wife appeared through the crystal
partition and said to her husband, "Speak, if you please." And when he
spoke, the life of wisdom from his wife was perceived in his speech; for her
love was in the tone of his voice. Thus experience bore witness to truth.
After this we examined the
Temple of wisdom, and also its paradisal surroundings, and then, filled
thereby with joy, we departed, and, passing through the avenue to the gate,
went down by the way we had come.
* See APOCALYPSE REVEALED (published in 1766), n. 875; the present work was
published in 1768. (CL 56)
CL 57. LOVE TRULY CONJUGIAL
Conjugial love is of infinite variety, not being the same with one person as
with another. With many it does indeed appear to be the same, but it appears
so only before the judgment of the body, and from this judgment, seeing that
it is gross and dull, man has little discernment of such things. By the
judgment of the body is meant the judgment of the mind from the external
senses. Before those who see from the judgment of the spirit, the
differences are apparent; and more distinctly apparent before those who can
elevate the sight of this judgment still higher, which is done by its
withdrawal from the senses and its exaltation into higher light. Such men
can then confirm themselves by the understanding and so can see that
conjugial love is not the same with one person as with another.
Yet no one can see the
infinite varieties of that love in any light of the understanding, even
though elevated, unless he first know the nature of the love itself in its
essence and integrity; thus its nature when together with life it was
implanted in man by God. Unless its state then be known, a state which was
most perfect, its differences cannot be discovered by any inquiry, there
being no stable point from which, as a commencement, those differences can
be deduced, and to which, by keeping it in view, they can refer themselves
and so be seen truly and not fallaciously.
This is the reason why we have
set out to describe this love in its genuine essence; and, since it was in
this essence when together with life it was infused into man by God, to
describe it as it was in its primeval state. In this state it was truly
conjugial, and therefore this chapter is entitled LOVE TRULY CONJUGIAL. The
description shall be given in the following order:
I. That there is a love truly
conjugial, which is so rare at this day that it is not known what it is and
scarcely that it is.
II. That the origin of this
love is from the marriage of good and truth.
III. That the correspondence
of this love is with the marriage of the Lord and the Church.
IV. That, regarded from its
origin and correspondence, this love is celestial, spiritual, holy, pure,
and clean, above every love which is from the Lord with the angels of heaven
and the men of the Church.
V. That it is also the fundamental love of all celestial and spiritual
loves, and thence of all natural loves.
VI. And that into this love
are gathered all joys and delights from their first to their last.
VII. But that no others come
into this love and can be in it save those who approach the Lord, love the
truths of the Church and do its goods.
VIII. That this love was the
love of loves with the ancients who lived in the Golden, Silver, and Copper
Ages, but that afterwards it gradually departed.
The explanation of these points now follows: (CL 57)
CL 58. I. THAT THERE IS A LOVE TRULY CONJUGIAL, WHICH IS SO RARE AT THIS DAY
THAT IT IS NOT KNOWN WHAT IT IS AND SCARCELY THAT IT IS. That there is a
conjugial love such as is described in the following pages, can indeed be
acknowledged from the first state of that love when it is insinuating itself
and entering into the heart of a young man and woman; thus as it is with
those who begin to love one only of the sex and to desire her as their
bride; and still more during the time of betrothal and during the
continuance of this time as it progresses towards the nuptials, and then in
the nuptial ceremony and during the first days that follow. Who does not
then give acknowledgment and consent to the following: That this love is the
fundamental of all loves, and that into it are gathered all joys and all
delights from their first to their last.
And who does not know, that
after this happy time these states of gladness successively decline and pass
away till at last the married pair become scarcely sensible of them? If it
be said to them then, as before, that this love is the fundamental of all
loves and that into it is gathered every joy and gladness, they neither
assent to it nor acknowledge it, and perhaps they will say that these are
idle words or that they are transcendental mysteries. It is evident from
this, that the primitive love of marriage emulates love truly conjugial and
presents it to view in an image; and this because love of the sex, which is
unchaste, is then cast out and, implanted in its place, resides love of one
of the sex, which is love truly conjugial and is chaste. Who does not then
look upon other women with a loveless nod and upon his own with a loving?
(CL 58)
CL 59. The reason why love truly conjugial is so rare that it is not known
what it is and scarcely that it is, is because the state of pleasure before
the nuptials is afterwards changed into a state of indifference arising from
insensibility to that pleasure. The causes of this change of state are more
than can here be adduced, but they will be adduced in the following pages
when the causes of colds, separations, and divorces are disclosed in their
order. There it will be seen that with most men at this day, the image and
with it the knowledge of conjugial love is so far effaced that it is not
known what it is and scarcely that it is.
It is known that every man when born is merely corporeal, and that from
being corporeal he becomes natural, more and more interior, and then
rational, and finally spiritual. The reason why this takes place
progressively, is because the corporeal is as the ground wherein, in their
due order, are implanted things natural, rational, and spiritual; thus the
man becomes more and more a man.
[2] It is almost the same when
he enters into marriage; the man then becomes a fuller man because conjoined
with a consort with whom he acts as one man. In the first state, spoken of
above, this is effected in an image; then in like manner he commences from
the corporeal and advances into the natural, but now as to the conjugial
life and hence as to conjunction into a one. They who then love corporeal
natural things, and only from them love things rational, cannot be conjoined
with a consort as into a one except as to those externals. And when the
externals fail, cold invades the internals and dispels the delights of that
love, first expelling them from the mind and so from the body, and then from
the body and so from the mind, and this until nothing is left of the
remembrance of the early state of their marriage, and consequently no
knowledge concerning it.
Now since this is the case
with most men at the present day, it is clear that it is not known what love
truly conjugial is and scarcely that it is. Not so with those who are
spiritual. With them, the first state is an initiation into perpetual states
of happiness; and these states are promoted in the degree that the spiritual
rational of the mind of the one, and from this the sensual natural of the
body, conjoins and unites itself with that of the other. But such men are
rare. (CL 59)
CL 60. II. THAT THE ORIGIN OF THIS LOVE IS FROM THE MARRIAGE OF GOOD AND
TRUTH. Being a universal truth, it is acknowledged by every intelligent man
that all things in the universe have relation to good and truth. It must
also be acknowledged that in each and everything of the universe, good is
conjoined with truth and truth with good, for this also is a universal truth
cohering with the other. The reason why all things in the universe have
relation to good and truth, and why good is conjoined with truth and truth
with good, is because both proceed from the Lord, and proceed from Him as a
one. The two things which proceed from the Lord are love and wisdom, for
these are Himself and are therefore from Him; and all things pertaining to
love are called goods, and all pertaining to wisdom are called truths. And
since these two proceed from Him as the Creator, it follows that these two
are in the things created. This can be illustrated by the heat and light
which proceed from the sun. From these are all things on the earth, it being
according to their presence and according to their conjunction that things
germinate; and natural heat corresponds to spiritual heat which is love, and
natural light to spiritual light which is wisdom. (CL 60)
CL 61. That conjugial love proceeds from the marriage of good and truth will
be shown in the treatise or chapter that follows. It is mentioned here
merely that it may be seen that this love is celestial, spiritual, and holy,
because from a celestial, spiritual, and holy origin. That it may be seen
that the origin of conjugial love is from the marriage of good and truth, it
is important that here something concerning it be presented in a brief
summary. It was said just above, that there is a conjunction of good and
truth in each and every created thing, and conjunction is not possible
unless it be reciprocal, for conjunction from the one side and not in turn
from the other is dissolved of itself. Now since there is a conjunction of
good and truth, and since it is reciprocal, it follows that there is a truth
of good or truth from good and a good of truth or good from truth. That the
truth of good or truth from good is in the male and is the masculine itself,
and that the good of truth or good from truth is in the female and is the
feminine itself, and that there is a conjugial union between these two, will
be shown in the chapter that next follows. It is mentioned here that some
preliminary idea may be had concerning it. (CL 61)
1.0.1.2.2.1
The Mental Origin of Semen
The origin of every single thing
in the natural world of time-space is a thing in the spiritual world of
eternity. The spiritual thing is the cause and the natural thing that
corresponds to it is the effect. Nothing can exist in the natural world that
is not an effect of something in the spiritual world. So the cause must occur
first in the mental world of eternity before any effect can exist in the
natural world of time-space. This is the law of correspondences that God
created to maintain control over the various layers of things in both worlds
(see Section xx).
Here we are considering the
cause or origin of human semen in particular, but also all seeds that
germinate and reproduce in the plant world. The spiritual cause of the power
to inseminate and reproduce in the natural world is a truth in the mental
world. If human beings lost the ability to comprehend and love truths revealed
by God in Sacred Scripture, truths would disappear from the mental world of
eternity. At the same time, all seed and semen, all biological reproduction,
would cease on earth. Put the truths back in the mental world, and the power
to produce semen or seed, returns to earth.
The ancient people on this
planet, before industrialization and civilization began as we know it,
possessed the science of correspondences and applied it to draw out
information from the correspondential sense. This is how they knew that the
semen and seed are produced by correspondence from truths in the mind of
humanity. All truths in the mind originate and inflow from God through the
Spiritual Sun (see Section xx).
Quoting from the Writings Sacred
Scripture: [explanations in square brackets are not in the original]
[ ]
CL 220. (11) The sexual
abundance men have is according to their love of propagating the truths of
their wisdom and according to their love of performing useful services.
[This says that a man's
physical semen is produced in the testicles by the dualist laws of
cause-effect correspondence. The cause is the man's love of transmitting
truths to others and his love of making use of truths to improve things;.
the effect is the "abundant" production of semen in the testicles.]
That this is the case is one
of the secrets known to people of ancient times and which today have been
lost. In ancient times people knew that each and every activity that
takes place in the body does so from a spiritual origin.
They knew, for example, that
actions flow from the will [affective organ], which in
itself is spiritual [mental]; that speech flows from
thought [cognitive organ], which likewise is spiritual;
also that natural sight [sensorimotor organ] results
from spiritual sight [cognitive organ], which is one of
the intellect; that natural hearing [sensorimotor organ]
results from spiritual hearing [affective with cognitive organ],
which is an attention of the intellect [cognitive organ]
and at the same time a conformity of the will [affective organ];
and that the natural sense of smell [sensorimotor organ]
results from a spiritual [mental] one, which is
perception [affective organ]; and so on.
In similar manner the ancients
saw that a man's power of insemination [semen] stems
from a spiritual [mental] origin; and from many
evidences of both reason [science] and experience
[empirical observation] they concluded that it [semen]
results from the truths of which the intellect consists [cognitive
organ].
Moreover, they said that from
the spiritual marriage [conjunction, synergy] that
exists between goodness [spiritual heat] and truth
[spiritual light], which flows into each and every thing
in the universe [from the Spiritual Sun], nothing else
is received by members of the male sex but truth [spiritual light
received in the cognitive organ] and what relates to truth
[science, rationality]; and that this, in its descent into
the body [correspondence from spiritual substance to natural
matter], is formed into seed or sperm (which is why seeds,
spiritually interpreted, mean truths) [wherever the word "seed" in
the literal sense appears in Sacred Scripture, God is actually discussing
"truths" in the mental world]
[2] Regarding the process,
they said that the male soul, being intellectual in nature [cognitive
organ predominates] is therefore truth [inflowing
spiritual light]; for anything intellectual in nature is nothing
else. Consequently as the soul descends, truth also descends. This is so,
they said, because the soul is the inmost element in man and in every
animal, and in its essence is spiritual [mental]; and
from an inherent effort towards its propagation, in its descent it seeks and
endeavors to reproduce itself.
Then, when this happens, the
whole soul [inmost anatomy of the mind] forms
itself and clothes itself [achieves a correspondence in the
natural world] and becomes [physical]
seed or sperm.
Moreover, this can take place
thousands and thousands of times, they said, because the soul [mental
genes of an individual] is a spiritual essence [mental
substance, spiritual heat and light] , which does not have
dimension but repleteness [completion, unity], and from
which there is no taking away a part, but instead a reproducing of the whole
without any loss to it [like making a digital copy] .
As a result, the soul is as fully present in its tiniest vessels, which are
the seeds or sperm, as it is in its largest one, which is the body [just
as there is a full set of genes in every cell] .
[3] So then, since truth in
the soul [spiritual light from the Spiritual Sun in the mental
world] is the origin of the seed or sperm [in the
physical world], it follows that the sexual abundance [physical
semen] men have is according to their love [mental]
of propagating the truths of their wisdom [cognitive organ]
.
It is also according to their
love of performing useful services, because useful services are the good
effects which truths produce. Some people know in the world as well that
the diligent have an abundance, and not the lazy.
I once asked how something
female can be generated from the soul of a man [spiritual genes
are transmitted by the father only]. The answer I received was
that it originates from good [spiritual heat in the affective
organ] in the intellect [cognitive organ],
because this in its essence is truth [spiritual light substance];
for the intellect [cognitive organ] can think that
something is good, thus thinking as true that this something is good. It is
different with the will [affective organ]. This does
not think about goodness and truth but loves them and does them.
Therefore, in the Word, sons
symbolize truths, and daughters, qualities of goodness (as may be seen above
in no. 120); and when seed is mentioned in the Word, it symbolizes truth.
(CL 220)
Anatomically from the female
soul they have, women predominantly receive spiritual heat substance into
their affective organ, while men predominantly receive spiritual light
substance into their cognitive organ. Semen corresponds to truths or spiritual
light. Hence it is that men, having a predominant cognitive organ, have semen,
while women, having a predominant affective organ, do not have semen, but
instead, have the capacity to receive semen, which men do not. Receiving semen
and using it as a blueprint for conception and pregnancy, is a power women
have because of they receive spiritual heat into their predominant affective
organ. Thus, men and women each have their reciprocal spiritual function in
order to achieve reproduction of new life. The source of this ability is
spiritual light and spiritual heat from the Spiritual Sun, thus from God (see
Section xx).
It is the good and truth in
God's affective and cognitive organs that constitute the infinite source of
the Spiritual Sun. From God's affective organ, infinite good and love flows
out and into the mental world of humanity in the form of spiritual heat and
light entering the affective and cognitive organs respectively, but in
different or reciprocal order of predominance for men and women, thus creating
gender and reproduction.
Conjugial couples who are in
their spiritual mind in eternity (or "heaven"), do not have physical semen or
physical reproduction of children. Physical semen or seed must be present for
reproduction on earth to take place. This is not possible in the mental world
of eternity where there is no physical anything. Hence physical birth and
reproduction is not possible in the mental world of eternity. Instead, mental
births occur, that is, the birth of mental things like new ideas, now
insights, new truths. These are the mental children couples have in heaven.
And as couples in their heavens produce more and more new ideas of truth and
insights or realizations (spiritual offspring), the more physical semen and
reproduction can occur on earth, and all the inhabited earths in the physical
universe, which is endless.
Week 4 Readings: Section 1.0.1.2.2
(Report 1)
-
Student 1: 1, 4, 7
-
Student 2: 2, 5, 6
-
Student 3: 3, 6, 7
4.1.
(a) Describe the mental physiology of men and women.
(b) How do you relate to this anatomical difference? Will it make a difference
to your life in any way?
4.2.
(a) Describe the physiology involved in the two stages of marriage. Consult
Volume 11, Section 11.4.5 "Conjunction Dynamics in Marriage" at:
www.soc.hawaii.edu/leonj/theistic/ch11.htm#conjunction-dynamics
Write out your own explanations and draw your own diagrams.
(b) When you are ready, explain
it to one or two
friends. What difficulty did you run into?
(c) What is your conclusion?
4.3.
(a) Explain why the mental body of men and women have to be reciprocals of
each other in order to achieve conjugial unity.
(b) How do you assimilate this piece
of knowledge in the positive bias in science mode?
4.4.
(a) Read the book Flatland at:
www.soc.hawaii.edu/leonj/theistic/flatland.pdf
Do you see similarities between its ideas and what you know of the mental world
of eternity?
4.5.
(a) Do a google search on marriage. What impressions do you get from this?
Summarize the trends and ideas that seem to dominate this topic.
(b) How would
theistic psychology fit into this?
4.6.
(a) Describe the the mental physiology of men and women.
(b) Discuss it with a friend or two. What
difficulties do you encounter when explaining this to them?
(c) What is your
conclusion?
4.7.
(a) Read at least five of the student reports on marriage listed at:
www.soc.hawaii.edu/leonj/leonj/leonpsy26/409b-g26-lecture-notes.htm#readings
and discuss your overall impression of them.
Study Questions: 1.0.1.3 to 1.0.7 (Report 2)
Week 5 Readings: Section 1.0.1.3 to 1.0.5.4
-
Student 1: 1, 4, 7
-
Student 2: 2, 5, 8
-
Student 3: 3, 6, 9
5.1.
(a) Describe the psychobiology of "conjunction" with God from the perspective
of the positive bias in science. You need to include the concept of how thoughts and
feelings are spiritual substances operating inside mental organs.
(b) Explain why this is called psychobiology. Explain the degrees of
conjunction.
(c) What happens to this psychobiology when we are in the negative bias in
science?
(b) How do you see this concept as applying to you?
5.2.
(a) Describe the infrastructure of physical things from the perspective of
substantive dualism.
(b) Show that the inmost of any object is the mental world of humanity.
(c) How does this change the way you look at objects around you?
(d) Are you able to explain this to a friend and be heard?
5.3.
(a) Explain why God hides from people. Include the concept of sensuous vs.
rational spirituality.
(b) What would happen if God showed Himself to your friends?
5.4.
(a) Describe how Divine Speech operates our mental life.
(b) Why does God not operate the minds of psychologists towards the positive
bias in science?
(b) How does this change your view of God and His relationship to people?
5.5.
(a) Where is heaven and hell?
(b) Describe its anatomy.
(c) Why do they both exist in everybody's mind?
(d) If you came to accept this, how would it affect your lifestyle or
character?
5.6.
(a) Describe the two methods God uses to conjoin or communicate with people.
(b) In what way have you experienced these two avenues of relationship with
God?
(c) Why does God not speak with people in their mind, like a dialog or
conversation?
5.7.
(a) Explain why this is a perfect world despite the appearances of
imperfection. Define what is perfection in the created world. Include the idea
that the world was created for human beings to help them evolve to their
eternal heavens.
(b) How do you answer some of the arguments people make when they insist that
this is far from being a perfect world today. How do you counter their facts?
5.8.
(a) Why does spirituality, or relationship to God, have to be rational?
(b) What happens with "sensuous spirituality" -- discuss what happens in the
afterlife.
(c) How do you react to or assimilate these ideas about your own future?
5.9.
(a) Explain the formula "mental world = spiritual world = afterlife =
eternity". Write out your proof after reading the assigned Section. Read it
and edit it until it makes sense to you. Make sure each = link is rationally
justified in your proof.
(b) Now try to explain the proof to a friend or two. How well did you succeed?
(c) What is your conclusion.
Week 6 Readings: Section 1.0.6 to 1.0.7
-
Student 1: 1, 4, 7
-
Student 2: 2, 5, 8
-
Student 3: 3, 6, 9
6.1.
(a) Explain the Swedenborg reports in relation to the positive bias in
science.
(b) Describe what happened to him? What did he discover?
(c) Describe how you manage to take on the positive bias in science regarding the
Swedenborg reports. Are you succeeding? What conflicts are you having to
contend with in your mind?
(d) Compare your adaptation efforts at the positive bias in science with those of your
friends with whom you discussed it so far.
6.2.
(a) What is the purpose of Sacred Scripture? What would happen without it?
(b) How does God want it to be used?
(c) How has it been used (today and before)?
(d) What might be a solution? (e.g., theistic psychology or...)
6.3.
(a) Explain the two senses we can find in Sacred Scripture.
(b) Give several illustrations from this Section.
6.4.
(a) Give two illustrations not found in this Section, so you will need
to search for this in Volume 18. Make sure you indicate which Sections you
took your two illustrations from.
(b) How do you react to finding out that there is a hidden scientific sense in
Sacred Scripture that is still unsuspected by most scholars even today?
6.5.
(a) What is rational spirituality in relation to God?
(b) Explain how we can comprehend higher spiritual ideas by means of the new
mental organ called spiritual-natural or interior-natural organ.
(c) How did it come into existence?
(d) Describe its role in the evolution of human consciousness.
(e) How do you react to these ideas that apply to your own mind?
6.6.
(a) Explain why substantive dualism is called substantive.
(b) How does substance differ from matter?
(c) Search google for "dualism" and explain how what you found is different
from substantive dualism in theistic psychology.
6.7.
(a) What is the most exciting piece of news or fact you have heard so far in
theistic psychology?
(b) Share this exciting fact with your friends and family. What do you
conclude form their reaction?
6.8.
(a) List some objections you or your friends can come up with against the
Swedenborg reports
(b) against the positive bias in science
(c) against the inclusion of God in science, and
(d) against one other issue of your choice.
Be sure you comment for each issue you list -- (i)
what the doubt is and (ii) what your current position is on it.
6.9.
(a) Make up a dialogue between you and a hypothetical friend in a situation
where you are telling your friend about this course. No length is specified.
It depends on how you write the dialog. You can add lines of explanations,
like a stage play, if you want.
(b) Show the dialog to a couple of people. Describe their reaction and your
discussion.
1.0.1.3 Revelation: Divine Speech Exteriorizing as Sacred Scripture
The two diagrams discussed in the previous Section clearly indicate that the
Divine Human's Divine Speech is nothing else than the spiritual substances of
good and truth flowing out from the Spiritual Sun in infinite variety, and
creating the mental world of eternity. Then, going beyond that, exteriorizing
still further, as shown in the diagram on
simultaneous order above, Divine
Speech creates then enters the spiritual mind, where it forms the human
heavens in every individual from birth onward. But whether the individual will
be able to live in that mental state in immortality depends on developing the
rational mind so that it comes into correspondence with our spiritual mind.
Once we start thinking and willing every day in conformity with our rational
understanding of Sacred Scripture, we are regenerating our mind (see Section
xx), so that it may become a "little heaven" or a "heaven in miniature." We
then start living the rest of our lives on earth in a mental heaven in our
natural mind, instead of the mental hells so many people live in most of the
time (see Section xx). Divine Speech
appearing outwardly as
Sacred Scripture is the only source of facts, knowledge, and principles about
the spiritual world of eternity and the afterlife. In other words, all
forms of rationality and truth that human beings exhibit, originate from
Divine Speech, and Sacred Scripture is the only containant of Divine Speech.
Hence, there can be no other source of truth or knowledge of reality than
Sacred Scripture. This assertion must be understood differently than
usual, when we examine the hidden layers of information that lie beneath
the literal sentences of Sacred Scripture (see Section xx).
How do we know what is Sacred Scripture? Whose opinion are we to follow? And
what if they are wrong? The definition
of Sacred Scripture in theistic psychology is any collection of writings
in a natural language that is produced by God through the mind of a particular
individual on earth. In other words,
Sacred Scripture = Divine Speech transformed into a natural language written
by an individual. Note that since it is
written by an individual, Sacred Scripture is necessarily a historically
produced ethnic document written and published in some country where the
document serves as the creation and foundation of a particular religion.
Note that it is not the belief or faith of people that makes a particular
document to be Sacred Scripture.
Billions of people could believe that
document X is Sacred Scripture, but this would not make it Sacred Scripture.
Sacred Scripture is only that which is Divine Speech authored through the
mind of an individual, regardless of who believes or does not believe it,
or who understands or does not understand it.
To test whether any document meets this definition, we must investigate
whether there are hidden layers of meaning underneath the natural, historical,
or religious meaning that is obvious to everyone who reads the document under
investigation. What are these hidden layers of meaning?
Swedenborg's Writings demonstrate with historical, rational, and empirical
proofs of various kinds, that the Old Testament and the New Testament
collections of documents are Sacred Scripture in accordance with the above
definition. How amazing!
He does not examine other documents or
collections of the world's "sacred literature," focusing exclusively on the
Old and New Testament books, of which he was an expert from childhood onward
(see Section xx). To my knowledge, no one since Swedenborg has attempted to
prove that other documents exist that are also Sacred Scripture, using the
above definition. This definition is given in Swedenborg's Writings., which he
uses to demonstrate that the words, phrases, and verses of the Old and New
Testaments hide an internal spiritual meaning whose content is theistic
psychology. The Writings do not use this phrase "theistic psychology" but it
is an appropriate title for the knowledge that is extracted from Sacred
Scripture, when a valid scientific methodology is used to extract the hidden
knowledge that resides in Sacred Scripture (see Section xx). This extraction
process will be illustrated, demonstrated, and studied in various detail
throughout theistic psychology (see Section xx).
People sometimes imagine that they are hearing Divine Speech which they refer
to as "the Voice of God came to me, and He said..." However, from the
scientific perspective of theistic psychology, it is necessary to describe the
actual psychobiology of how Divine Speech enters the human mind, just as
biology describes the process of how sunlight enters the human eye and
producing vision. These details are known to no one as they involve the
spiritual mind, of which we are totally unconscious, its operations being
unavailable for observation under any circumstances. Therefore it makes sense
to think rationally, within the positive bias way of reasoning, that God must
have a way of making His messages conscious to us. Indeed, this is the content
of the hidden scientific layers of information that is contained in the
historical or literal sentences of Sacred Scripture.
In other words, we can recover the original meaning of Divine Speech, prior
to its being transformed and cast into a historical, ethnic, religious format
or meaning. This is the best news
humankind has heard in many hundreds of years! Certainly the best news in
science since its beginning. This news is first announced in the Writings of
Swedenborg written and published in the second half of the eighteenth century,
between 1743 and 1771 (see Section xx). Why
is this such good news for science and humankind? Because now for the first
time we are given a valid methodology for interpreting Sacred Scripture.
Look what has happened without this knowledge. The Old Testament Sacred
Scripture was written at the level of mentality and culture that was prevalent
in the Middle-East approximately from 1000 BC to 400 BC. Anyone can see today
that the literal meaning of the Old Testament Sacred Scripture reflects a
barbaric civilization that is totally racist and totally patriarchal with
women being officially treated in a slavish and cruel role. This barbaric era
of human civilization produced a version of Divine Speech that is totally
alien to God's true nature and personality (see Section xx). Today, from a
perspective of democracy and modernism, we are horrified that they had such a
perspective on God that God Himself had to enact a role to them historically
that is alien and abhorrent to His very nature and personality (see Section
xx).
For in the literal meaning of the Old
Testament sentences, God is a God of fury and vengeance, who gets angry like a
super-potentate against His subjects, and take it out on them from vengeance,
bringing on the destructive forces of nature to punish and decimate what He
created. And on top of that, God has to order them to make sacrifices by doing
to animals things that we would be horrified today to do.
Worst of all, in my opinion, is the almost
total absence of discussion, description, and explanation of what happens when
we die. A few mysterious hints are given, but they are so little, that many
people and scholars who know very well the literal meaning of the Old
Testament Sacred Scripture, are totally ignorant of what happens at death, and
they have had to make up their own imaginative stories of what happens or
might happen.
In other words, the literal religious
meaning of the Old Testament Sacred Scripture does not reveal any knowledge of
theistic psychology, which is the science of immortality and afterlife,
extracted from the hidden layers of meaning of the Old Testament Sacred
Scripture, along with the New Testament Sacred Scripture, and the Writings
Sacred Scripture (see Section xx). The New
Testament Sacred Scripture was written in a more advanced era of human
civilization around the first century AD, also in the Middle East. In its
literal meaning, the New Testament Sacred Scripture presents a more
universal and inclusive philosophy of life and God, and contains many
important theistic psychology facts. To my mind, the most important of these
is the revelation that "the kingdom of God is within you, among you, in the
midst of you" (depending on the translation of Luke 17:21 -- see:
http://bible.cc/luke/17-21.htm ). Few people have understood that
the "within you" is not used metaphorically, but literally!
Yes, that's right. The heaven of eternity is in our affective organ of the
spiritual mind (see Section xx). In other
words, our mind is already in eternity -- see the Section Born Into Eternity
above.
The Writings Sacred Scripture were written
and published by Emanuel Swedenborg and published in the eighteenth century,
which was the era of the New Enlightenment of the modern age. The literal
sense of the Writings are a mixture of theology, science, and religion.
From the perspective of theistic psychology,
the literal meaning of Sacred Scripture is suitable for religion and theology,
but not for science. Although the Writings Sacred Scripture are written by a
modern scientist with a rational and empirical orientation, the literal
language of presentation is immersed in history and religion surrounding
Swedenborg's European cultural context. The Old and New Testament Sacred
Scriptures in their literal sense are even less suitable for science, as they
are from an earlier civilization and historical mentality.
But when you make the literal sense of Sacred Scripture "vanish" from focus by
translating the natural historical correspondences in which they are written,
into their spiritual, universal and scientific meaning that is hidden within
the literal sentences. This scientific spiritual meaning is the content of
Divine Speech when regarded in the spiritual mind rather than the natural
mind. It is extremely important for you
to remember that while the literal meaning of all Sacred Scripture is
historical, ethnic, and religious, in contrast, the hidden layers of
scientific meaning within it, are non-sectarian, non-historical, non-cultural.
They are scientific, universal, spiritual, eternal, rational.
Political movements based on the literal meaning of Sacred Scripture
are called fundamentalist. Fundamentalism is sectarian, intolerant, sometimes
violent, and not based on rationality or science.
But the hidden layers of information within
the literal meaning of all Sacred Scripture are universal and scientific
because that is the very content of Divine Speech (see Section xx). When we
decode what is within Sacred Scripture we find a theistic psychology manual
and handbook. How amazing! But why? Why in
this way? For what purpose? As you will
discover when studying the anatomy of the mind and the afterlife of eternity,
God creates the human mind into discrete or discontinuous layers, that
interact or influence each other by the laws of correspondences (see Section
xx). As Divine Speech descends it enters into our spiritual mind where it
activates certain rational operations, of which we are unconscious. We can
however describe what happens there when we use representative ideas (see
Section xx). A few hours after death, we are resuscitated or awakened through
our spiritual mind, which until then was unconscious, but now, not any more,
and so we begin our life of immortality in the afterlife by means of this
spiritual mind. Swedenborg became conscious in his spiritual mind at age 57,
and for the next 27 years was able to see simultaneously what was happening in
the physical world in Sweden and Europe, and what was happening in the world
of the afterlife (see Section xx).
See the Layers
Diagram. This is how he was able to empirically
discover and describe the laws of correspondences between the layers of the
mind. These are the correspondences that allow us to climb up the ladder of
Divine Speech across the layers of the human mind, from Sacred Scripture,
which is the bottom, to the highest potential in our mind called "heaven" (see
Section xx). Why Swedenborg? No one has the
capacity to be conscious in their spiritual mind. Swedenborg was a unique
exception, accomplished by the God Divine Human to allow him to write the Writings
Sacred Scripture. He was given to do this differently than the prophets of old
in the Old and New Testament Scriptures. They received mental dictation into
the natural mind, so that the thoughts merely appeared in their consciousness,
and they wrote them down. They had no rational understanding whatsoever of
what scientific knowledge was hidden within the sentences they wrote down. But
Swedenborg was a scientist in the modern world of the 18th century. He was
made fully conscious in the spiritual mind to enable him to make empirical
observations and conduct spiritual experiments, according to his scientific
mind and evaluation.
The result of this difference in how the
Writings Sacred Scripture were produced is that the literal meaning of the
Writings can be read rationally, and most of it can be read scientifically as
well (see Section xx). But in addition, endless scientific knowledge lies
hidden within the literal meaning that Swedenborg constructed. Swedenborg knew
that what he wrote was "under the guidance" of the Divine Psychologist, and
hence was Divine Speech expressed in Sacred Scripture in a modern scientific
mode. Swedenborg understood that he himself had almost no access to this
infinite storehouse of scientific knowledge hidden within the sentences he
wrote down. And if Swedenborg is now in the heavens of his spiritual mind, he
can read the Sacred Scripture that is there, without realizing or knowing,
that he himself authored it when he was on earth (see Section xx).
Sacred Scripture is the sole source of rational knowledge about God
(repeated from Section 15.0).
There are two different approaches to
knowing God that have been practiced by humanity over the generations. In
theistic psychology these two spiritual disciplines are called sensuous
spirituality and rational spirituality (see Section xx).
The discipline of sensuous spirituality
involves the attempt to experience the "divine" through various
physical methods -- meditation, yoga,
fasting, trance, self-flagellation, sexual abstinence, visions, animal
sacrifices, making miracles happen, hearing living voices, ingesting
psychotropic chemicals, and others. These methods involve the idea that the
"divine" can be experienced by human beings through these physical
techniques of sensing the body. In theistic psychology this is
known as the philosophy of nonduality (see Section xx). Non-duality is the
opposite of dualism (see Section xx). Nonduality asserts that God and human
beings are of one continuous substance, which implies that we can climb high
enough to actually realize that all along we each were God.
In contrast, rational spirituality is the
spiritual discipline of getting closer to God through Sacred Scripture. In
theistic psychology it is known that the spiritual mind in which our heaven of
eternity lies, is formed by the spiritual-rational and celestial-rational
correspondences of Divine Speech hidden within Sacred Scripture. This makes
sense when you consider the fact that God is Divine Truth covered over with
Divine Love (or good) (see Section xx). Good can only conjoin with its own truth
(see Section xx). The higher the level of Divine truth that we can consciously
understand rationally, the closer we come to God's Divine Truth and Rationality.
Truth is the spiritual-rational and celestial-rational substance that forms the
rationality in the mind of every human being (see Section xx).
Rational spirituality is the discipline
of extracting the rational doctrine of truth from Sacred Scripture using the
method of correspondences that is revealed in Sacred Scripture, and then
applying this doctrine of truth to one's daily willing, thinking, and doing
(see Section xx).
It is not yet known in our modern times that
the heaven of our eternity is located within spiritual-rational and
celestial-rational correspondences of Sacred Scripture. When we understand and
love these rational correspondences of Divine Speech, which means living and
thinking according to them, then we are preparing our spiritual mind to be a
conjugial heaven in which we know God directly and receive from Him all that we
are willing and able to take in terms of human potential and happiness.
It is clear that knowledge about eternity
and God is not possible to be discovered through the sensations from our
physical body and the reasoning power of our natural mind. The proof of this is
that traditional science, with its amazing history of inventions and
explanations, knows zero about eternity and God, so that all it can do is to
deny that such things exist or are part of scientific reality. Another proof is
that the enormous scholarship and effort invested over the centuries in the
literature on religion, God, and spirituality, has brought zero knowledge about
God and eternity, and only wild speculations and disagreements among them.
All this proves that scientific and
scholarly knowledge of God cannot be discovered and invented, but only received
from God through the correspondences of Divine Speech in Sacred Scripture -- not
the literal sense of Sacred Scripture (which is sectarian religion), but the
revealed correspondential sense that lies hidden within (see Section xx). The diagram below portrays the distinct
difference between religion and theistic psychology, even though they are both
closely related to Sacred Scripture.

Sacred Scripture is the expression of Divine Speech in a natural
language, transformed through the laws of correspondences that God used to
create the layers of mind and existence (see Section xx). See
the Layers Diagram.
Although the sentences of Sacred Scripture are
written out by a an individual in a particular language and culture, they are not the individual's
own sentences, but sentences that have been transformed by correspondences as
Divine Speech descends into that individual's mind from its unconscious
spiritual level to its conscious natural level (see Section xx). First, Divine Speech enters
the celestial-rational mind of the individual. This is unconscious while we are
still connected to the physical world. Second,
Divine Speech descends into the spiritual-rational layer of the individual's
mind, which is also
unconscious until our resuscitation (see Section xx). Third, Divine Speech descends
by correspondential meaning into the natural mind of the
individual, where it becomes conscious and the person is able to write it down.
The "prophet" or "revelator" does not himself know what layers of
correspondential meanings lie hidden with the sentences they write down. They
and others are only aware of the literal meaning.
The descent of Divine Speech through the layers of the human
mind takes place by correspondences (see Section xx). Those who are conscious in
their celestial-rational mind after their resuscitation (see Section xx), are conscious
of Divine Speech in terms of celestial-rational correspondences (see Section
xx). These celestial-rational meanings or truths give human beings the highest possible consciousness,
knowledge, worship, and love of God.
Those who, after resuscitation, are conscious in their
spiritual-rational mind, are conscious of Divine Speech in terms
of spiritual-rational correspondences (see Section xx). These meanings of Sacred
Scripture give human beings the next lowest possible consciousness, knowledge,
worship, and love of God. Those who are conscious in their natural mind,
namely, us while we are still connected to earth, are conscious of Divine Speech
in terms of natural correspondences of Divine Speech (see Section xx). These
natural meanings of Sacred
Scripture give human beings the next lowest possible consciousness, knowledge,
worship, and love of God.
We are connected to earth by the laws of correspondences which
functionally link together our mental body in eternity and our physical body in
time-space. Our conscious natural mind is capable of entering virtually,
as a training ground, into the various layers of worship and love of God. We
begin with natural worship and love of God which is based on our ethnic
membership in a particular religion and our historical ties to the literal meaning of Sacred Scripture
recognized in that religion. If we do not try to live by the truths of Sacred
Scripture as we understand them, then we are not preparing ourselves adequately
for immortality in eternity (see Section xx). Instead of being or existing in a heaven
within our spiritual-rational mind,
our consciousness then sinks into the bottom of our natural mind, which is
called the corporeal-sensuous mind, as opposed to the natural-rational mind (see
Section xx). See the
Layers Diagram.
At this level of feeling and thinking, the correspondences of
Sacred Scripture cannot be comprehended rationally. All truth of Sacred
Scripture is inverted and perverted through irrational thoughts and feelings,
which taken together as a whole, are called the human hells in the mind (see Section xx). It is our choice, but the choice is to be
made prior to death, while we still can reform our character from inherited hellish
traits to freely acquired heavenly traits (see Section xx).
To the extent that we try to live by the truths of Sacred
Scripture that we understand, to that extent God can elevate our consciousness
from the natural-sensuous thinking and feeling, to the natural-rational thinking
and feeling (see Section xx). When God thus elevates and enlightens our
understanding of Him, we become capable of a higher spiritual-rational worship and love of God, as
a result of which God can further elevate our consciousness from
natural-rational, to spiritual-rational, and finally to
celestial-rational meanings of Sacred Scripture.
This process of elevation of the individual by God takes
place through
(1) the individual's rational study and understanding of
Sacred Scripture as Divine Truth, and
(2) in proportion to the individual's efforts at applying this understanding
to one's daily willing, thinking, and doing. This means undergoing spiritual
temptations.
1.0.1.3.1
What are Spiritual Temptations
Knowledge of Divine truth cannot change our hellish character, but
can only give us an understanding of how God's truth is to dictate our willing, thinking, and doing.
Conjunction with God occurs afterward, and only to the extent that we are
willing to give up our hellish and selfish enjoyments, and replace them with
heavenly and altruistic enjoyments. In proportion as we do this, to that extent
we are conjoined to God in rational understanding, worship, and love.
Conjunction with God gives us an eternal conjugial heaven with a maximum of
human love, altruism, enjoyment, and happiness (in the affective organ), along
with their consequent rationality, wisdom. intelligence, knowledge, and
inventiveness (in the cognitive organ).
We vary in sincerity and consistency. We must be willing to
undergo the temptations that God puts in our way in our mind. This requires
spiritual combat. Our understanding of Divine truth from Sacred Scripture
provides the weapons for the combat against our hellish enjoyments (see Section
xx). Once we engage in combat, as if of our own, then God immediately manages
the victory for us. We can have no victory if we believe that we are fighting
our evils with our own power and intelligence. God can provide victory only if we
acknowledge in our mind and understand rationally, that by ourselves we have
zero power since God is omnipotent and has all the power.
Remember this:
Spiritual temptations are within the natural temptations. It is not possible
simply to have a spiritual temptation, but only a natural temptation within
which lies deeply hidden a spiritual temptation. We can have natural
temptations alone, without spiritual temptations in them. This phase is needed
so that we can build a virtuous character to counterbalance our inherited
preference for selfishness. In the selfish phase we are irrational because we
are convinced that selfishness is better than altruism. If we continue in this
mode of thinking all our lives, then when we are resuscitated, we
automatically and gleefully choose selfishness for our eternal life, and this
is in the hells of our mind (see Section xx). So it is in our best interest to
use our conscience and our common sense to oppose selfish traits and to become
a responsible ethical citizen. We do this by fighting our natural temptations
like procrastination, laziness, deception for convenience and gain, revenge,
rage, putting others at risk, being inconsiderate to neighbors or room mates,
out of control gambling, drugs, promiscuity, etc. etc. These are character
flaws and weaknesses that the Divine Psychologist brings to our attention
through events in our environment, like who we meet when, what we remember or
forget, what someone says or does, what emotions come to us, etc. etc. God
manages these mental events so that our focus of attention may come to our
temptation. In this way we can choose to give in and continue, or to resist
and stop.
This is God's purpose, as revealed in Sacred Scripture
regarding the process of regeneration (see Section xx). This is also called
the process of becoming a spiritual person (see Section xx). It means that the
phase of the natural temptations is going well with you so that you can enter
the next phase, the one that really matters. This phase begins when you begin
to think about the spiritual meaning and significance of your natural
temptations. For example, let's say you've been working on yourself to be more
considerate to people around you. So you turn down the volume on your radio or
TV, avoid leaving dishes in the kitchen sink, and continue flossing your teeth
every day. You are motivated to do this because you want to become a better,
nicer, more rational person. You are experiencing natural temptations that
bring thoughts to your mind in which you are trying to explain away your
selfish actions, e.g., "Everybody else leaves dishes in the sink, so I will
too." or, "I don't mind annoying my neighbors with my TV so I can retaliate
against their partying late at night and keeping me awake." Etc. These are
natural temptations because you have to use natural reasons to fight these
thoughts and defeat them. For instance, you can say to yourself: "I've got to
rise above it and be a better person they are. Their gad behavior does not
justify my bad behavior. Treat them like you want them to treat you, not like
they are treating you." Etc. These are natural-rational reasonings.
Once you begin to win these natural temptations on a regular
basis and reliably, you are prepared for the spiritual temptations. In order
to overcome spiritual temptations you must have spiritual truths to fight
with. Prior to your possessing spiritual truths, God does not bring you into
spiritual temptation, that is, God does not allow your mind to experience such
thoughts. The reason is that if you did experience such temptations, you would
give in to them. And once you give in to spiritual temptations your mental
conditions is worse than before, much worse. Hence God is very careful to
prevent you from having spiritual temptations until you have equipped yourself
with spiritual truths that can fight these reasonings. For instance, you now
avoid leaving dishes in the sink. Every time you are tempted to leave the
dishes or postpone cleaning up, you reason it out with yourself, thinking that
it's not fair for the other people, and you want to be a fair person instead
of a hypocrite. You are successfully overcoming your natural temptation with
your natural-rational reasoning. But now what if you were to think: "I don't
need to be totally fair as long as I can get away with it. It's not good to be
too good in a competitive world. Too much fairness is a weakness. Let the
do-gooders who believe in truth and decency be fair. Me I rather be a winner
and unfair, than fair and a loser in life."
You might have read some philosophy or self-help book that
leads you to such thinking. If now, all of a sudden, you begin to wonder
whether such selfism is right or wrong, good or evil, in God's order or
against it, then you are experiencing a spiritual temptation within the
natural temptation.
People can read and adopt such philosophies of selfism and
cynicism but they may do so without critically evaluating it. This means that
the ideas of selfism are just on the surface of one's memory, having read it,
and even saying that one likes it or adopts it, but without actually doing so
in daily events. For instance, you turn down the radio volume because it
bothers you that the sound bothers others. This is not selfism but the
opposite. And when you have an opportunity to cheat without getting caught,
and you decide not to because it's wrong and you don't want to be that type of
person, then you are acting against the philosophy of selfism. But this is
still a natural temptation and a natural victory. It leaves you connected to
inherited character flaws related to selfism. In other words, though you
reject selfish acts on the outside of your public life, you retain selfish
emotions and intentions that are within, not so conscious. For example, you
might prefer to avoid being inconsiderate for the purpose of gaining
acceptance by others, which allows you to practice selfish traits without
others knowing about it. This is sometimes called "having ulterior motives"
and being "manipulative."
But now you started thinking more seriously about your
afterlife and God. You are wondering whether it is right for you to be
considerate for selfish reasons. You are now aware that God knows when you are
selfish and pretending to be considerate for the purpose of gain,
manipulation, or reputation. This is a spiritual temptation. God is bringing
this spiritual temptation to you at this time because you have already
acquired some spiritual truths from Sacred Scripture or from your conscience,
or from some other person who already possesses spiritual truths. The natural
temptation you are having is: "It's all right for me to look out for myself
since no one else will. The strong win, the weak deserve to lose." The
spiritual temptation you are having simultaneously is: "Only God is strong.
Evil may appear to pay off, but in the end, evil return to evil. I don't want
to be in evil. God gives me the power to make the right choices, to be good."
This is a spiritual temptation, spiritual battle, spiritual victory. Spiritual
enlightenment is experienced the moment one makes the decision against evil in
oneself. Then comes spiritual ecstasy and peace (see below).
So spiritual temptations are always given within natural
temptations and the two cannot be separated.
To understand this process in detail you need to know the
difference between:
(a) being considerate for the sake of self
(b) being considerate for the sake of others
(c) being considerate for the sake of God
For explanations, see Sections 6.4
to 6.7
Under some conditions we fall into the persuasion that to fight
our temptations as if on our own, would be to think that the power to fight is
ours -- which is a hellish thought against the reality of truth. As a result of
this kind of thinking, we fall into a passive mode and wait for God to liberate
us in our trial. But this strategy cannot work and it prevents character
reformation. In that case God cannot bring spiritual temptations for us to fight, but only
natural temptations (see Sections xx). Natural temptations build our external
personality, appearance, and overt conduct. This is necessary for acquiring
morality according to one's conscience (See
Section 7.0.4.1). But the inner character cannot be
altered by natural temptations. It requires spiritual temptations. God brings
spiritual temptations to our mind to the extent of our rational understanding of truth
from Sacred Scripture (see Section xx).
Without the truth of Sacred Scripture in
our rational understanding, God cannot bring spiritual temptations to our mind,
and as a result, we cannot be regenerated. We die in the character that we
inherited, which is a hell (see Section xx). Only the truth of Sacred Scripture,
applied to spiritual temptations, can give us the new heavenly character we need
to live in the heavens of our eternity (see Section xx).
Hence it is necessary for us to have in our understanding Divine
rational
truth in order for us to be prepared for heaven by temptations through regeneration or
daily efforts at character reformation. The higher the rationality in our
understanding of truth from Sacred Scripture, the more we can be regenerated by God to higher and
higher heavenly potentials, in proportion to our daily efforts in applying the truth
to our daily willing, thinking, and doing.
It makes sense therefore to think
that God has provided a method by which we can acquire higher and higher
meanings, or more and more rational meanings, so that we can apply it to our
daily willing and thinking, and thereby become celestial beings in our heavenly
eternity (see Section xx).
The diagram above shows that theistic psychology, and
theistic science generally, is the scientific knowledge that is extracted from
Sacred Scripture, when we apply the method of correspondences with enlightenment
(see Section xx). There are two ideas to understand here: correspondences and
enlightenment.
When Divine Speech, or Divine Truth, descends by correspondences through the layers
of the human mind, we are conscious of it differently at each successive layer. That is,
Divine Speech forms our consciousness at each level of the mind, through
meanings of Sacred Scripture. See the
Layers Diagram.
Divine Speech becomes conscious to human beings
through the meanings of Sacred Scripture, and these meanings in the layers of
the mind vary from highest (celestial-rational) to
lowest (natural-sensuous), that is, from most rational to less and less rational. Divine Speech is Divine
Truth hidden in layers of Sacred Scripture, and therefore it is pure and absolute
rationality. This Divine rationality is
adapted or accommodated to the individual's mind by means of the layers of meanings
in correspondences. When we
ask, What does this sentence of Sacred Scripture mean? And then when we give a
paraphrase of it, then our thinking is operating at some level across the layers
of meanings possible in our mind, from highest to lowest (see Section xx).
The change in meaning of Sacred Scripture is managed by God
through successive levels of correspondences. God wants us to know what these laws of correspondences
are that He uses to manage the created universe through Divine
Speech (see Section xx). God has therefore revealed through the Writings Sacred
Scripture what these correspondences are (see Section xx). Illustrations and
demonstrations will be given in the following Sections (see also Section xx).
See the Layers
Diagram.
One must therefore study and understand the laws of
correspondences by which Divine Speech becomes Sacred Scripture at various
levels of human thinking and feeling. These laws are Divine and cannot be discovered. Nor
must we invent them or construct them from human intelligence. In the Writings
Sacred Scripture, God has revealed what these correspondences are. The same
correspondences apply to all Sacred Scripture since there is only one Divine
Speech that filters through the various natural language versions of Sacred
Scripture in all the genuine religions that God has created on this earth.
Important to note the following:
It is taught in the Writings Sacred
Scripture that knowing correspondences is useless unless God enlightens the
individual's mind to perceive their spiritual-rational correspondences, and
later, their celestial-rational correspondences (see Section xx).
You can read a
dictionary of correspondences (see Section xx) and try to understand the
spiritual meaning of natural expressions in Sacred Scripture --
but this will only allow you to perceive the natural meaning of these
correspondences. For instance
we can read in the dictionary of correspondences that when Sacred Scripture
mentions "water" (rain, ocean, river, flood) it is actually discussing
natural truths in our understanding. But when Sacred Scripture is mentioning
"wine" it is actually discussing spiritual truths. This is easy to translate mechanically, but what does it mean? What is spiritual
truth vs. natural truth? In order to know this, we need to study other passages
of Sacred Scripture while God is opening our rational understanding of it. And
God does this with any person who is studying for the sake of applying the truth
to daily life.
Theistic psychology is the scientific knowledge that we
accumulate through the method of correspondences with enlightenment. You can see
the result of this effort as you read throughout the 18 volumes of this work. If
your purpose for studying theistic psychology is to acquire correspondential truths from
Sacred Scripture, with a view to applying them to your daily willing, thinking,
and doing, then God will enlighten you, raise your consciousness to the highest
levels, and empower you with wisdom and conjugial love (see Section xx).
Divine Speech
emanates from God the Divine Human and permeates the universe, creating the
mental world, and the physical world in successive order, and maintaining
everything in a simultaneous order order that serves God's purpose of love for
humanity (see Section xx). Divine
Speech enters the human mind at the highest level of consciousness that humans
are created into called the Third Heaven in the spiritual mind. Then it descends and exteriorizes to
the Second Heaven in our spiritual mind. From there, to the First Heaven in our
spiritual mind.
From there into the rational and the natural mind, which is where we become conscious of
our mental operations.
We
first become conscious of Divine Speech in our natural mind when we read
Sacred Scripture, or are exposed to derivative forms of it such as prayers,
songs, stories, lessons, instructions. At this point we understand Divine
Speech in a natural way, in the way we understand the instructions or
explanations of teachers and parents. As we grow older and we are able to read
Sacred Scripture on our own, we begin to form more abstract notions of God,
though not yet spiritual notions. As we become more mature we also become
conscious of the voice of conscience in our rational mind (See
Section 7.0.4.1). This is a second way in which we become conscious of Divine Speech. We
have the liberty to reject what we hear from Sacred Scripture and from our
conscience. If we do this repeatedly until it becomes a habit, then we cannot
regenerate our character, and after resuscitation we insist on living in the
hellish thoughts and feelings we have acquired and loved. Focusing
our attention on Sacred Scripture brings us into direct contact with God
because the content of Sacred Scripture is Divine Speech expressed in a
natural language for the natural mind of humanity. You can see from the two
anatomical diagrams discussed that before Divine Speech reaches the conscious
natural mind, it has passed through the spiritual mind and the rational mind
without our knowing it at the time. In fact, the spiritual substances of good
and truth from the Spiritual Sun must continuously inflow into the mind, or
else the mind collapses or is extinguished. But this is not possible. After we
are resuscitated, a few hours following the death of the physical body, we
become conscious in our spiritual mind. Then for the first time, as
experienced by Swedenborg, we begin to see rational things in Sacred Scripture
which before were hidden from our conscious awareness.
Swedenborg reports that he often was able to
see and inspect the books of Sacred Scripture in the mental world of eternity.
In fact, he saw libraries of books there, that stood visible as long as the
person in it was interested. But when the person is in a different mental
state, no libraries are seen. Further, when a person sees a library there,
only those books are seen which the person has an interest in, and can
understand the content. So the book in the mental world of eternity are not
like books in the physical world which are read and held through the physical
body. Obviously, every book that has ever been written is merely a physical
containant of mental ideas rendered through sentences. There is an exact
correspondence between physical sentences and mental events that create
meaning for them to the reader or hearer. So it's logical to expect that every
physical book on earth is just a copy of a mental book in the world of
eternity. Swedenborg reports that books of Sacred Scripture in the spiritual
mind of eternity appear to glow with an intense light that blinds anyone from
approaching, unless the person's mind has been prepared for reception of
Divine Speech.
Without this preparation, the person's mind
would go through a melt down. Once Swedenborg saw a man recently resuscitated,
approach the book of Sacred Scripture, ignoring the warning given him by a
by-stander. The instant he reached out his hand to touch it, he was thrown at
a great distance away, where he lay unconscious for awhile, before coming to,
and going away.
Saying that
Divine Speech is proceeding from God is exactly the same as saying that Divine
Truth is proceeding from God.
Divine Truth is a spiritual substance called spiritual
light that is streaming forth from the Spiritual Sun that Swedenborg was able
to see in the world of eternity that was in his spiritual mind (see Section
xx). At age 57 he suddenly found himself with the
unique ability of being conscious in his spiritual mind, which is unconscious
to us until the afterlife. When we are resuscitated a few hours after death,
we awaken in full conscious awareness of our spiritual mind, which until then
was unconscious. Now it is the natural mind that becomes unconscious, and the
spiritual mind becomes conscious. As a result, we can no longer see or hear
anything in the physical world through our physical body, to which we are no
longer connected by correspondence. The physical body dies when it can no
longer be in correspondence with the mental body, due to illness or other
causes. Becoming conscious in our spiritual mind means that we can now
hear, see, and feel everything in the world of eternity called the spiritual
world.
Swedenborg discovered that this world of
eternity outside time-space, which is known to people from Sacred Scripture,
is nothing else than the mental world of humanity which existed since creation.
This fact is not known outside theistic psychology and Swedenborgian theology.
No one today knows this "heavenly secret" and when you tell your
friends, it will be big news! Just remember this formula and learn to explain
it from the discussions above: spiritual
world of afterlife in eternity = mental world we are already in now
(see "born into eternity" as "dual citizens"). Since Swedenborg was the only scientist in history whose spiritual mind was
conscious, he is the only scientist in history who can give us an objective
and empirical description of the spiritual world of eternity. Everything that he wrote
down and published, called the Writings of Swedenborg (published
between 1747-1771), is part of Divine Speech as Sacred Scripture in a natural
language. God
opened or made conscious Swedenborg's spiritual mind so that he could objectively report to the
world of science what the conditions are in the afterlife of eternity. To
study Swedenborg's Writings as Sacred Scripture is the positive bias in
science, as discussed. From all this you can
see what are the three basic premises upon which theistic psychology is founded,
namely
-
dualism of substances in time vs.
eternity
-
theism of Divine influx controlling
all phenomena
-
revelation from the hidden
scientific meaning of Sacred Scripture
Practice talking about these concepts after
taking notes from the discussion on Topic 1.
1.0.2
Topic 2: The Spiritual World of
Eternity
When Swedenborg's spiritual mind became
conscious at age 57 his amazing discovery was that the spiritual world of eternity in
the afterlife was nothing else than what we call the mental world! In other words:
spiritual world = mental world =
rational substances = afterlife = eternity
This equation brings it home to us. We are
very familiar with the mental world. We are in it. It is our life. Take away
our sensations, thoughts, and feelings, and what have we got left? Nothing
but a biological shell, like a tree or rock. Human beings are alive in the
sense that their sensations,
thoughts, and feelings are alive. This is the mental world. So the mental
world is alive, unlike the physical world which is dead.
Note carefully the rational answer to: Where are
you now?
You are not in this physical room. Your physical body is in this room.
You are not your physical body just like the banana peel is not the banana. Your
mind or mental body is in the mental world. What is so familiar to us
from minute by minute experience and life, is actually the spiritual world of
the afterlife in eternity known to people from Sacred Scripture. We
don't know this directly or by observation because we have no awareness of our
spiritual mind, like we do of our
natural mind. As long as our spiritual mind remains unconscious, we have the
illusion or compelling sensation that we are in the room, with the physical body, and that what we
are sensing through the body is the room and its environment.
But in fact we are not sensing the room, nor the
stimulus from the room to the sensory organs and the brain. We are sensing the
sensations in our mind, the thoughts in our mind, the feelings in our mind. We
are sensing the mental world, not the physical world. The two are of course in
correspondence (see Topic 1), so that my sensations in the mental world
correspond to the neuronal activity in the brain. These physical neural
operations in the brain correspond to the physical details of the room and its
environment. Once you realize this -- that your natural mind exists in the spiritual world, not
in this physical world -- you can begin to understand that we are immortal human
beings. Your personality, your memories and identity, your feelings, emotions,
and thoughts -- these are not physical and temporal materials; they are
immortal, eternal, spiritual substances constructed out of spiritual heat and
light from the Spiritual Sun (see Section xx). Hence you can see that
sensations, thoughts and feelings
must be immortal and eternal, because they are not existent in time and space.
As a mental being it is not possible for you to be in a physical room. Swedenborg discovered that when he was conscious in his spiritual mind he was
able to be in company with people he had known who had died, and people he
read about in history and literature. This proved that everyone who dies is
resuscitated in the spiritual world and continues life there forever.
Swedenborg observed thousands of people die and be resuscitated about 36 hours
later in the spiritual world. Most of these people he said are pretty
surprised to see themselves up and running after dying.
Swedenborg's discovery that the spiritual world of the afterlife, being
eternity, is nothing
else than what we call the mental world, is surely the greatest scientific
discovery of all times. This amazing discovery changes our most fundamental concepts of the universe
and life.
Substantive dualism is not a theoretical supposition. It is an absolute fact
that is familiar to every human being. Nothing can be more familiar to us than
the mental world of our sensations, thoughts, and feelings in which our
conscious awareness is immersed every moment of our life. Who would have suspected this
amazing fact that Swedenborg discovered, namely, that this familiar mental
world is the world of eternity!! Sensations, thoughts, and feelings are
operations or states of mental organs that are made of spiritual
substances, and not at all like
physical objects made of physical matter, like the brain. Physical objects are in time and
space, hence they must be temporary. Everything temporary is in time-space,
and everything in time-space is temporary, that is, has a temporary existence,
not permanent. But mental objects like thoughts and
feelings are not in time and space. Thoughts have no mass, no physical energy,
and cannot be measured or detected by anything physical. Only the brain's
activity can be measured. Thoughts and feelings
cannot be measured because they take up no space, they have no weight, no mass,
and no time dimension. It is the same with sensations and feelings.
Mental
objects are spiritual objects, and everything spiritual is outside time and
space, and this is called eternity. Our sensations, thoughts and feelings are in eternity.
They can never leave eternity and enter time-space. They cannot stop existing
because they are made of eternal living substances (see Section xx). Your personality, which is nothing but your
sensations, thoughts and feelings, is
therefore eternal or immortal. Your self is immortal. You are immortal!
We are born into eternity and our self exists only in the world of eternity
outside time and space. This is the mental world, which is also called the
spiritual world. You are immortal. Wait
till you tell the good news to your friends! You can say: "I bear good news. You were born immortal. Only your physical body is in time
and space, and when it dies, your conscious awareness awakens in the spiritual
mind, which until then remained unconscious." See if they are willing for you
to explain it rationally. But if they don't take it seriously, do not despair.
Continue studying theistic psychology and soon you will understand enough to
really prove it to them -- anyone who believes in you enough to hear you out
all the way with a positive bias.
Swedenborg's reports
are hardly known today after being published and republished for more than 200
years now. And yet these reports present and prove his amazing discovery that there is only
one mental world called the spiritual world of eternity. Every human being is born into
this one mental world, which has been called the spiritual world of eternity.
When we are born we are dual citizens for awhile. Our physical body and organs are born
in the natural world while our mental body and organs are born into the
spiritual world. The two are connected until the physical body dies. When the
separation occurs, we are resuscitated or awakened in our spiritual mind which
was unconscious until then. We were conscious in our natural mind only. Hence
we could not see or be aware of the other people who were also there in the
spiritual world. Now that our natural mind is made unconscious, our awareness
is brought to our spiritual mind. Now we are able to see and interact with the
people who are also there. Swedenborg interviewed thousands of people, some of
whom he knew while they were alive in Sweden, others he knew only from history
books, and yet he was able to see them as they are now and to talk to them.
At the end
of his last book published in 1771, Swedenborg gives an Index of his spiritual
travelogues which he calls "Memorable Relations" -- things he saw and heard in
the spiritual world of the afterlife, outside time and space. You can read all
his Writings and Memorable Relations online at:
www.theheavenlydoctrines.org and at
www.smallcanonsearch.com/
Use the
following conversion Table to help you translate the religious literal content
to its universal scientific meaning.
Religious Literal content of
the Writings Sacred Scripture |
Conversion to Universal Scientific Content
in Theistic Psychology |
| the Lord |
God the Divine Psychologist |
| His New Church, the New Jerusalem |
theistic psychology |
| He has opened the interiors of my mind or spirit |
God activated my conscious awareness in the
spiritual mind |
| angels |
people in the afterlife with a heavenly personality |
| evil spirits, satans |
people in the afterlife with a hellish personality |
| men |
people |
| Who in the Christian world |
Who among believers of all religions that worship one God |
| spiritual world, the heavens |
the mental world of eternity or afterlife |
| the Word |
Sacred Scripture |
Note: underlined words
are theistic psychology renditions of the original, as indicated in the
conversion Table above. The number
where the Memorable Relation can be found is marked in parenthesis at
the end of each paragraph below.
TCR 851. I foresee that
many who read the Memorable Relations annexed to the chapters in this
work will believe them to be inventions of the imagination. But I affirm in
truth that they are not inventions, but were truly seen and heard; not seen
and heard in any sleeping state of mind, but in a state of full wakefulness.
For it has pleased God to manifest Himself to me, and to send me to
teach those things which will belong to theistic psychology, which is
meant by "the New Jerusalem" in the Apocalypse. For this purpose
God activated my conscious awareness in the spiritual mind, whereby I
have been permitted to be in the spiritual world with people in the
afterlife with a heavenly personality, and at the same time in the
natural world with people, and this now during twenty-seven years.
Who among the religious believers of all
faith that worship one God could have known anything
about Heaven and Hell, had it not pleased God the Divine Psychologist
to open the sight of someone's spirit, and show and teach him? That such
things as are described in the Memorable Relations do appear in
the mental world of eternity or afterlife, is made clear by the like
things seen and described by John in the Apocalypse, also in the Sacred
Scripture of the Old Testament by the prophets.
This topic is dealt with in more detail
in several places in theistic psychology (see Section xx).
1.0.3
Topic 3: Divine Speech, Sacred
Scripture, and Conjunction With God
Sacred Scripture is Divine Speech
transformed by correspondence into a natural language (see Section xx). All
genuine Sacred Scripture has therefore two levels of meaning. The clearly
visible literal sense is historical and cultural, leading to particular
religions. The hidden correspondential sense is universal and culture-free.
Hence although the literal sense of the various collections of Sacred
Scripture is necessarily cultural and ethnic, also divisive against each
other, the hidden correspondential sense of all Sacred Scripture is unified
and consistent, relating to the rationality and love of Divine Speech as One
God for all.

(See also Section 15.0 for additional discussion)
1.0.3.1
Part 3A: The Psychobiology of Conjunction with the Divine
Human
Our life of immortality is not something
that belongs to us. It is not inherent in us. We are human "vessels"
or receptor organs, created to receive life from God by reacting to God's
influx with good and truth substances. In other words, God cannot give life to
us in the sense that we then possess life from ourselves as we go about our
daily life. For example, when you fill your car's gas tank and drive off
(after paying for it), you have that gas in the car. It is yours and the
car's. God cannot give life to us like the gas station gives gas to the car.
Think instead of your electric stove at home. When you turn it on and it gives
out heat, that operation of giving heat is totally dependent on the inflowing
electricity into the elements that consequently heat up. As soon as the flow
of electricity is cut off, the heat stops. So the heat element is capable
of reacting to the inflow of electricity in such a way as to generate
heat. This is similar by analogy to the
situation with God's life inflowing into the mental organs which were
constructed by God out of the spiritual substances of good and truth, so that
they may be able to react to new inflow of good and truth from God.
"To be able to react" = being affected =
being conjoined. The ear drums of our
physical body are constructed out of physical substances to have the property
of reacting to the inflow of air waves produced by sounds in endless variety.
The cognitive organ of our mental body is constructed out of spiritual
substances to have the property of reacting to the inflow of truth substances
in endless variety. What is amazing is that these two operations -- in the ear
drum and in the cognitive organ -- must go on together, synchronously, in
simultaneous order, if we are going to hear sounds and interpret their
meaning. Our mind has existential
continuity because it is re-created, re-born, every instant from birth to
eternity. This is literally true, not an exaggeration. God has revealed this
astonishing fact about the universe! The mental world and the physical world
are created by the inflow of good and truth, and they live in a moment of
time. Then they die. But here comes the next inflow of good and truth, and
recreates the mind, exactly such as it was the instant before. Then the
universe dies. God recreates it once more the next instant, exactly such as it
was before. And this goes on to endless time and eternity.
So if we know this, then we cannot
rationally attribute any power, any life, or any intelligence to ourselves.
From ourselves we are dead organic receptors, being revived from instant to
instant by inflow of new life into our mental organs. We also would want to
realize that the Divine Human does all this out of love for us, so He
wills that we not feel the death-recreation cycle instant by instant.
In this way we have a sensation of subjective continuity of life from
ourselves, as-of self, forever, endlessly. This is the result of God's love
for us. The Writings Sacred Scripture reveal that the essence of love is to
desire to make another happy from ourselves. For instance, most pet owners
love their pets, and when you observe them with their pets you can see how
they are always trying to make their pet happy.
It is the same with parents who are always
striving to benefit their child from what they own -- their house, their
money, their services, their attention, their promises, their contacts. In
short, if you love someone you try to make them happy or benefit them out of
what you own yourself. God the Divine Human has good and truth in infinite
variety that He wishes, desires, and intends to benefit us with. If we believe
that these goods and truths are from ourselves, instead of from God, we
interrupt the inflow of good and truth, and what we end up with are their
filtered opposites manufactured in our mind -- corrupted goods called evil,
and falsified truths called falsities. God communicates scientific facts to
the human race through Sacred Scripture, but not directly in the literal
meaning, for this would not be understood by most people who rely on Sacred
Scripture for their religion. The scientific
revelations laid hidden in Sacred Scripture for thousands of years before God
could prepare the human race for their rational understanding. This required
the modern mind of science. Swedenborg (1688-1772), a noted and respected
scientist in his era, was among the first to achieve a modern scientific mind
in the mode of theism. Until then the topic and study of God remained in the
exclusive prerogative of religious people and theology experts. But now, with
theistic psychology having arrived on the scene of science, God is entering
the realm of modern science. This is possible only because of the Swedenborg
reports, which are called the Writings Sacred Scripture (see Section xx).
When you are thinking about how God's Divine
Human life inflows into us and does not belong to us, you can give your
friends this analogy. Think of the TV we watch. It is designed to receive
electronic signals that are displayed on the screen and loudspeaker. The TV
does not possess the content of those images and sounds. It just receives
them. Similarly, we do not possess life, intelligence, rationality, power, or
freedom of our own. These are spiritual things belonging to God. But God
constructed our mental organs out of spiritual eternal substances called good
and truth, and
designed the organs to function as as receptors of good and truth substances that
issue from God and belong to God even when these substances are in our
mental organs and are operating our thoughts and feelings!
Even then, the good and truth remain
belonging to God since God cannot give away anything Divine, hence cannot
separate anything Divine from Himself. But He can extend Himself to exist
outside of Himself (see Section xx). This is the meaning of "Divine
influx" which refers to how God extends Himself to exist in created things.
This extending is accomplished by means of the spiritual substances of good
and truth proceeding from Himself to outside of Himself into creation
("influx"). And whatever has proceeded to be outside of Himself still
remains Himself, though now in a different relationship to humanity than
before (see Section xx). So there is God in
Himself (unreachable to human beings), and there is God as He extends Himself
outside of Himself in the created world (reachable by human beings). Human
beings can be conjoined to God outside of Himself, but not to God as He
is within Himself. The expression "Divine Proceeding" or "Holy Spirit" is
often used to refer to the part of God we can be adjoined to and conjoined
with, namely the good and truth from Him as Him in our mental organs. It is
not logical to think that the Divine good and truth within our mental organs
is ours, and those who think in this way, might even say that human beings are
God. A lesser version of this belief is that human beings are pieces of God.
Another belief is that we are unreal images as we know ourselves, and there in
reality we are God. And so on. These various accounts of how we are related to
God are not based on Sacred Scripture, hence they are not part of theistic
psychology.
We need to make a distinction
between
(1) "our
afterlife in eternity" -- which is created and has a beginning in the
creation of the human race; and
(2) "the
uncreated eternity of the Divine Itself"
Only the second is infinite, not
the first. “Infinite” is defined as having no beginning and no end. Only God
and His attributes – love, good, truth, life, rationality – are infinite and
have no beginning. Hence the created dual universe is finite for it has a
beginning even if it will have no end. So it’s rational to think that the
infra-structure or building blocks of the finite created dual universe has to
be the uncreate things of good and truth – since there is nothing else created
out of which then created universe can come from or be built out of. Something
cannot be built out of nothing. So the only rational conclusion is that the
infrastructure or building blocks of creation are uncreate, infinite, with no
beginning.
Theistic psychology refers to
the afterlife as “the mental world of eternity" because the mental world of
the human race is constructed out of spiritual heat (or love) and light (or
truth) from the Spiritual Sun (the Aura around God), and these two substances
are uncreate and infinite in the Divine eternity of love and truth that has no
beginning. Hence the eternity of the human afterlife has a beginning even
though it can be endless. Because of this mixed nature, the mental world of
eternity can interact with an infinite God since then mental world is
constructed out of the uncreate substances of this infinite God.
Hence it is that we must make a
distinction between "God as He is in Himself" from infinite eternity without
beginning vs. "God as He is Outside of Himself in Creation" such as
-
Divine Speech
-
the correspondential sense of
Sacred Scripture
-
the Doctrine of Truth from
Sacred Scripture
-
the voice of conscience
-
the soul
-
the Divine Psychologist
(“Holy Spirit”)
-
Divine Providence
-
The Divine Child or the
Natural Divine Human
These are various
manifestations or appearances of "God as He is Outside of Himself." Note
carefully that it is irrational to think that God can create a universe
without Himself being in it, for He would then not be omnipresent, omniscient,
and omnipotent. But at the same time rationality dictates that these two
cannot be the same. Hence the infrastructure of creation is God as He is in
Himself, but the creation itself is not God, but manifestations of God as He
is Outside of Himself. The manifestations appear finite and therefore can
relate to finite things like human beings.
Note also that the finite Divine
manifestations of God in the created dual universe are part of an evolutionary
process by which God shapes, guides, and pulls the development of human
consciousness and potential generation after generation.
Note also that this rational conception of
God and creation is not at all like some theories or philosophies that say
that we ourselves are God but don't realize it until we evolve our individual
mind towards higher and higher consciousness through reincarnated lives. This
view is contrary to scientific dualism in theistic psychology. God as He is in
Himself is a Person who always was, in whom infinite love and truth make one.
This Divine Person Creator could not be somebody else, like a human being He
created with a beginning. You can see from the two charts in the
previous section that when you look at your physical body in the mirror, and
you do it with theistic psychology x-ray vision, you are looking at an
external "temple of God" inasmuch as your mind is a discrete degree within
your physical body, your heaven in eternity is in your spiritual mind, and God
the Divine Human is a discrete degree within that heaven. Clearly then, God
exists as the inmost of your physical body in terms of discrete degrees. You
cannot logically think that this portion is yours! If it were yours, you would
be God. But you are not God. So it is not logical to think this way.
But at the same time you can see from this biological account that we are in
symbiotic relationship to God. This relationship has two modes of depth --
-
(1) adjunction to God
-
(2) conjunction with God
The closer or deeper we are conjoined with
God the more good and truth we can receive from Him. This shows itself as
greater intelligence, inventiveness, skillfulness, love, happiness, and zest
of life. These are the substances of good and truth in infinite variety
operating in our sensorimotor, cognitive, and affective organs (see Section
xx). Those who deny God in the negative bias mode are nevertheless equally
dependent on conjunction as those who love God. Every human being by
birthright, is entitled to receive things from God. This is granted by God to
everyone, even those who ridicule Him and construct magical rites and belief
systems to pervert His good and truth. Even they are entitled to inalienable
rights they have for being born human beings.
One such human right is immortality. It is
awful to think of ourselves as temporary and mortal. It hurts our true
humanity to believe such an illogical idea. It perverts our conscience and
leads us to a hellish personality (See
Section 7.0.4.1). So God effects unconscious conjunction in
the mind of those who deny Him or pervert Him. He protects their right to
spiritual freedom, so that at any moment in their life from birth to eternity,
they have the endless opportunity to change their mind, to turn toward
reality, hence to God Himself who is the center of their reality and the
origin of everything they own and desire.
The purpose of religion over the millennia
on this planet has been to conjoin human beings to God. According to the
dictionary, the word "religion" comes from the Latin "religare" meaning to
connect or to bond with God. So God uses religion for conjoining human
beings to Himself, so that He may bestow upon them ever more good and truth,
and thereby to make them happy from Himself. So human happiness and ability
are the outward operations of the Divine Human substances of good and truth
inflowing instant by instant, into our mental body. First, into the
unconscious spiritual mind, where our heaven is. Second, into our rational
mind, and thence into our natural mind. Our physical body is consciously
operated by our natural mind. this is the mechanism of living as a human
being.
It is
clear that our biological immortality belongs to God, not to us, and we have it only as
long as we are conjoined to God by unconscious influx and reception, and by
conscious communication through rational ideas from Sacred Scripture. The instant we
should go "offline" so to speak, and stop receiving the spiritual input signal
of life, power, love, and intelligence, that instant we disintegrate into
something incoherent that dissipates and disappears from existence as a human
being. To understand how we are alive and what it means to be alive, we need to know
what God has revealed about Himself to humanity. These revelations are known
as Sacred Scripture. The literal meaning of Sacred Scripture in a natural
language was given to serve as the basis of religion. The scientific meaning
hidden within the literal, was given to serve as the basis for theistic
science and theistic psychology (see Section xx).
Quoting from the Writings Sacred Scripture:
SS 78. Further, it is through Sacred
Scripture that God the Divine Psychologist is present with us
and is conjoined with us, for God the Divine Psychologist is Sacred
Scripture, and as it were speaks with us in it. God the Divine Psychologist
is also Divine truth itself, as likewise is Sacred Scripture. From this it
is evident that God the Divine Psychologist is present with us and is at the
same time conjoined with us, according to our understanding of Sacred
Scripture, for according to this we have truth and the derivative
rational knowledge in our cognitive organ, and also pro-social
motivation in our affective organ. God the Divine Psychologist is indeed
present with us through the reading of Sacred Scripture, but we are
conjoined with Him through the understanding of truth from Sacred Scripture,
and according thereto; and in proportion as God the Divine Psychologist has
been conjoined with us, in the same proportion theistic psychology is
active in our mind. Theistic psychology is within us; theistic
psychology that is outside of us is the institutionalized scientific
discipline with a number of us who have theistic psychology within them.
This is meant by the words of the Incarnated Divine Human to those
who study theistic psychology without applying it to their daily willing and
thinking who want to know how heaven is established in our
mind:
"The kingdom of God is within you"
(Luke 17:21).
Here the "kingdom of God" means God the Divine Psychologist, and from Him,
knowledge of theistic psychology. (SS 78) (see Note below)
Note: The following substitutions were
made in the above paragraph indicated by italics:
|
Original Literal
Expression in the
Writings Sacred Scripture
(for religion) |
Equivalent Translated
Concept into
Theistic Psychology
(for science) |
|
the Word |
Sacred Scripture |
|
the Lord |
God the Divine
Psychologist, Incarnated Divine Human |
|
a man, him, his, he is |
us, our, we are |
| faith |
rational knowledge in our cognitive organ |
| love and the derivative life |
pro-social motivation in our affective organ |
| the church is in man; with man; within him; outside of man |
the knowledge of theistic psychology is active in our
mind; outside of us is the institutionalized scientific discipline of
theistic psychology |
| the Pharisees |
those who study theistic psychology without applying it to
their daily willing and thinking |
| who asked |
who want to know |
| when the kingdom of God would come |
how heaven is established in our mind |
| within you |
in our mind |
The conversion Table above illustrates the
way in which theistic psychology is extracted from the literal meaning of
Sacred Scripture. As you can see, all traces of the original historical or
ethnic references vanish, and what remains is universal science applying to
all human beings. Many more illustrations will be given in what follows (see
also Section xx).
Let us recapitulate a few propositions
that you need to remember and keep in mind as a context for what you are
reading as you go on:
(a) God creates and manages the universe through
the infinite mental substance of Divine Speech, which is Rational, Human, and
Divine. Divine Speech proceeding from God is Divine Truth, which is the
substance of spiritual light streaming from the Spiritual Sun. Spiritual light
substance, or Truth substance (also called Wisdom), contains within it, spiritual heat
substance, or Love substance (also called Good).
(b) Physical objects on earth are made of atoms from the natural sun
that are whirling
in sub-atomic space, which forms the object's infrastructure in time and space. Every
physical object is constructed of
these atoms from the sun. The sun is actually still part of these atoms. But
physical matter, atoms and space, are themselves made of something at a
discrete level higher, or within, that is not
physical matter in time, but spiritual substance in eternity, which originates from the Spiritual Sun
in infinite variety. The spiritual infrastructure at a discrete degree within
the atoms and within space, keeps the atoms and the space in existence.
Rationally viewed a thin cannot give origin to itself. Hence when you see a
thing rationally, you are thinking of that which causes it to exist and to
maintain itself in existence. That cause or infrastructure is the spiritual
substances of the Spiritual Sun. From this you can see that Divine Love
(or Good), and Divine Truth (or Rationality), are the spiritual
eternal substances that make up the infrastructure of the spiritual world,
also called the mental world in eternity, and
this makes up the infrastructure of the physical world, which is in time and
space. To say that God creates the world out of and by means of Divine Speech,
means that God's mental substances of good and truth, pouring out of Him,
create the world of eternity, which is the environment in which exists the
mental world of humanity. Your sensations, thoughts, and feelings, moment by
moment endlessly operating in your mental body, all exist in the world of
eternity. They cannot exist anywhere else. And since that world is made of
spiritual substances, you can see that our sensations, thoughts, and feelings
must be also made of spiritual substances. Our mental world is a real world of
immortal substances. Our thoughts and feelings, coalescing into a coherent
self or person, exist as substances operating in our immortal mental body,
which we acquire at birth (see Section xx).
(c) In other words, eternity is the
infrastructure for time and space.

This chart depicts any object's infrastructure of existence. It applies
to whatever unit you are looking at in the physical world -- galactic,
planetary, object, sub-atomic particle -- you are looking at the world of
time-space-matter, whose infrastructure in
simultaneous order is the world
of eternity. This is true globally as well as at any size or level of
physical abstraction. Question: What is inside your pocket or purse? If you
take "inside" in terms of discrete degrees, then the answer would be, "The
world of eternity made of the substances of the Spiritual Sun is inside my
pocket or purse." What about your tooth brush? The answer is the same. What
about your brain? Same answer. Try to explain this magnificently rational
secret to your friends. they will jump for joy -- if they are willing to hear
you out long enough so they can understand rationally what you can understand
from studying theistic psychology. Since the
spiritual world of eternity = the mental world of the human race (Swedenborg's
great discovery), therefore
the human mind is the infrastructure for the physical universe, as
shown in the chart above. (See Section
xx)
The physical world is the outside of the universe, while the spiritual
world, or mental world, is the inside of the universe. When we are born, our
temporary physical body is in the outside world of time and space, while our mental body
is in the inside world of eternity. When the physical body dies, our
consciousness of the outside world ceases, and we become conscious of the
world of eternity. For 27 years (from age 57 to 84), Swedenborg lived
consciously present in both the world of eternity and the world of time-space
in Sweden in the 17th and 18th centuries. When you are resuscitated, a few
hours after your physical body dies, you awaken in your spiritual mind, and
the world of eternity becomes conscious to you. You can see everybody else who
is there, where they live, how they live, and you can join any society that
you choose. Swedenborg talked to people like Aristotle, whom he knew from the
history books, and many other persons, some who had lived on other planets
than earth (see Section xx).
Our first reaction to hearing such stories
is that they are fantastic visions of a strange person. But this is an
external perspective on Swedenborg in the negative bias mode. Remember that
Swedenborg was not some kind of a strange person whose mind was somewhat
deranged and living on the streets or in an asylum. During the 27 years while
he was conscious in both worlds and wrote the reports we are studying, he did
the following things on a daily basis:
-
held a demanding job as a government
engineer and administrator of mining
-
was a member of the Swedish House of Lords
and authored several bills on finance reform
-
was a publisher of science magazines and
reports
-
traveled throughout Europe visiting with
the labs of famous scientists
-
collected books for his brother-in-law's
bookstore
-
frequently attended dinners at the palace
by invitation from the royal family
-
wrote and published respected scientific
books on metallurgy, chemistry, physics, astronomy, anatomy of the brain
All of Swedenborg's biographers agree that
he was one of the greatest geniuses the world has ever seen. So now this
famous scientist at age 57 suddenly becomes conscious in the spiritual mind!
He applied his genius and enthusiastic motivation to this new area of
investigation that he was uniquely given to explore. He left behind 30 volumes
that are an entire integrated series of all that he was able to observe and
rationally explain. And now we have come to realize that these reports are
actually the Writings Sacred Scripture. As soon as I made this discovery,
based on the insights of a few others (see Section xx), I was able to apply to
it the systematic method of extraction specified in the Writings themselves
(see Section xx). The result was the new science called theistic psychology,
which you are now studying. This new discipline is not yet known to other
psychologists, so you are still among the first people in the world who are
exposed to theistic psychology. You can access the student reports by earlier
generations through the list in
Volume 18, Readings, Part 2.
To me one of the most significant of Swedenborg's scientific discoveries is
that when we die, we are actually not dying, but awakening in our spiritual
mind, where we live our immortality in eternity. This is traditionally called
the "spiritual world" by many people who know about it from Sacred Scripture.
Swedenborg direct confirmation of this process by observation and
experimentation for 27 years, is new evidence that has not been available to
science before. Theistic psychology is based on this new evidence, when read
with the positive bias in science. Further, all or most of Swedenborg's discoveries can
be confirmed by each one of us, either by rational proof or by self-witnessing
observations of one's own daily life (see Section xx).
Our mental world, the one we are in already now, is the spiritual world of
eternity. The entire human race, regardless of their physical earth location,
is resuscitated into the same mental world of eternity, so that you too will
have access to people not born on earth -- should you desire that.
Everything one desires in the mental world of eternity, one can have.
Everything in that world is instantaneously created when you want it, and
disappears from existence when you don't want it any more (see Section xx).
Wait till you tell your friends about this! Reality is better than what they
could have imagined. God is not a mysterious
force that is inaccessible or difficult to access. Theistic psychology shows
how God is actually an intimate participant, enabler, and manager of our
mental world, every single detail of it, and much more of it that we know
nothing about. So it is extremely important that this knowledge be placed at
the disposal of all people. God is a Divine Human Person with whom we can have
a conscious relationship. God desires that we reciprocate our relationship
because when we do, He can empower us with new intelligence, skills, and
happiness. This is God's sole motivation for being involved in every human
being's thoughts and feelings from birth to endless immortality.
But God will not appear in front of you and
talk to you in a physical way. God will not send you a letter or a taped
message. God will not speak to you with a physical voice you can record.
The only way God will communicate with us physically or externally is through
Sacred Scripture. When we read Sacred Scripture we are hearing God's
Divine speech come down into the sphere of the natural mind. This has lasted
for many generations. It has been the basis of all religions. But since the
Writings Sacred Scripture have been written and published (1747-1772) by
Swedenborg, God has revealed to modern science, for the very first time, that
all Sacred Scripture is sacred because it is Divine Speech, which means that
there is a hidden scientific and universal meaning that cannot be seen when
reading the sentences of Sacred Scripture.
The reason the correspondential sense of Divine Speech is hidden within the literal
meaning, is a physiological one. As you already know from the anatomical
charts you studied up to now, and more later on, a human being is human
because of the physiology of the mental body that contains our mental organs
whose operations provide us with sensations, thoughts, and feelings at various
discrete levels (see Section xx). Divine Speech is already in our spiritual
mind, which is built to receive it directly in its correspondential sense. But then
Divine Speech has to descend into the rational mind, and the natural mind, and
in that descent or exteriorization, Divine Speech changes from spiritual
meaning to natural meaning. So what we
read in Sacred Scripture is the literal meaning not the spiritual meaning.
Remember also that what is in successive order, appears in
simultaneous order
when the successive phase is complete (see Section xx). At that point what was
First or Highest, now becomes inmost. So the spiritual meaning of Divine
Speech is inmost within the literal historical meaning. This secret was
unknown until the Writings Sacred Scripture described and demonstrated the
appropriate method of extraction by which we identify the spiritual meaning
that is hidden in its inmost. Theistic psychology is the knowledge we obtain
when we apply this prescribed technique to analyzing Sacred Scripture (see
Section xx).
You can see therefore that theistic
psychology cannot be made up of theories people invent, like non-theistic
psychology and the rest of materialistic science. New-age spirituality,
transpersonal psychology, paranormal research -- are all collections of
theories by numerous people. This is not at all the method by which theistic
psychology can be developed and grow in your mind, or as a cumulative science
for future generations. The only way theistic psychology can cumulate in a
genuine or valid direction, is the flawless application of the methods of
extraction prescribed and demonstrated in the Writings Sacred Scripture (see
Section xx).
(d) Our consciousness, our
understanding, and our feelings are all initiated and governed by Divine
Speech proceeding from God into the universe and propagating itself
simultaneously through
all human minds. There are no specially privileged minds that receive more
than others of the substances of God's Divine Truth and Divine Good. They
inflow simultaneously into every human mind since all human minds overlap
in the world of eternity (where there is no physical space). When Divine Speech enters the
rational mind, we become
conscious of its effects in the natural mind such as the ability to think logically, or the ability
to experience human feelings and emotions.
Everything we do, sense, think, or feel are
operations of our mental organs while they are activated and operationalized
by Divine Speech entering the mind in the form of good and truth substances
-- the substance of good into our affective organ giving rise to feelings and
motives, and the substance of truth into our cognitive organ giving rise to
cognitions and thoughts. The substance of good is spiritual heat, and the
substance of truth is spiritual light, the two flowing out of the Spiritual
Sun in infinite variety, providing our ability to have new and unique human
thoughts and feelings for every human being from birth to endless immortality,
continuously.
(e) Divine
Speech conjoins our mind with God, and it is this conjunction that gives
humans the ability to be immortal and rational beings. The mechanism of
conjunction is presented in the next Section. There are gradations of conjunction
or closeness with God. This determines the quality of our feelings,
thinking, and sensating. Closer conjunction with God results in a higher
quality of feeling, thinking, and sensating. Swedenborg observed and compared
the life and personality of people in their Third Heaven, Second Heaven, First
Heaven, as well as people in the hells of their mind (see Section xx). He found that the level
of available human potential goes up or down depending on closeness to God.
Any human being can choose to be either close or distant from God, who enables
whatever a person chooses from freedom or preference. Those who
freely maintain themselves in the hells of their mental eternity think irrationally,
are under the spell of illusions and delusions, and their social environment
is miserable, vicious, and uncivilized. They are the furthest they can be from
conjunction with God, and as a result, what they receive from good in terms of
good they pervert into its opposite or evil, and what they receive from God in
terms of truth, they convert into its opposite, or falsified truth. This is
how they willingly maintain themselves in the hells of their mind. They could
ascend at any time from the hells to the heavens in their mind. Swedenborg talked to
many of them about God and the heaven in
their own mind, which they hated and irrationally denied. Whenever Swedenborg mentioned to them
anything good and true, they became enraged with hatred and turned the idea
into its opposite of evil and false. The
people who dwelt in the First Heaven of their mind, were extremely skilled in
all daily activities such as business, sports, art, education, architecture,
government -- far superior to the best skills they had while living on earth.
But remember that these expert activities in the mental world of eternity are
not at all like they were on earth where time and space determine what happens
(see Section xx). The people who dwelt in the Second Heaven of their mind were
a discrete degree superior to
those in the First Heaven, and similarly those in the Third Heaven of their
mind were a discrete degree superior to them. Closeness of conjunction with God therefore
physiologically determines the level and quality of human life from birth to eternity. While we are still attached to the body on earth, the quality and level of our
life also depends on closeness to God, but in a less obvious way compared to
the afterlife. This is because God hides His Sensuous Presence in the
natural and rational mind. The
reason for this is that on earth we are undergoing character change,
reformation, and regeneration, while this is not possible in the afterlife
(see Section xx). In
order to undergo character reformation that is permanent we must do it as-if on our
own, with as-of self effort and the willingness to resist temptations (see Section xx).
Only in this manner of voluntary and free choice is the new character
something we can love, something we can accept as our eternal heaven (see
Section xx).
Due to the necessity of this freedom of choice and as-of self
effort, God hides His Sensuous Presence in our natural mind so that we may feel free to reject
Him if that is our choice (see Section xx). If God suddenly spoke in your
natural mind, you would hear voices like the prophets of old before the modern
era. But today this kind of direct sensuous communication would be harmful to
our modern mind, and you would be diagnosed as delusional or schizophrenic --
a very serious mental disease. Hence it is that God would never speak to you
in the natural mind with a physical voice, or would not appear to you visually
to your physical eyes. Our understanding of reality and God, to be valid and
effective, must be based on the rational understanding of God as He describes
Himself in Sacred Scripture.
To see God with the "inner eyes" is possible
for people on earth, and this inner sight is called rational understanding.
You know this from our popular expression "I see what you mean." To understand
rationally = to see with the inner senses. This refers to the sensorimotor
organ of the spiritual mind (see Section xx). Once we have a rational basis for
a relationship with God, we become capable of seeing God's Presence rationally
in our mind, that is, in terms of the good and truth substances that operate
our thoughts and feeling (see Section xx).
If we do not identify all the good and all the truth we have as being God's
good and truth in our mental organs, then we attribute our intelligence and
abilities to our self. When we do this, we physiologically alter the
operations of good and truth in our mental organs, transforming them into
their opposites. Then our consciousness resides in the hells of our mind,
which is the furthest distance from the rationality of God that forms our
heavens far above the hells (see anatomical charts throughout).
Even though we consciously choose to reject God we cannot get rid of God in
our physical and mental environment. God continues to run
our mind and our environment regardless of our acknowledgement of Him. This is
God's omnipotence and omnipresence by which he controls every detail of the
universe -- the thoughts and feelings in our mind, the events of
biography and history, the motion of molecules in objects, stars, and
galaxies. God controls and manages every detail according of His order of
truth and his purpose of good (or love).
(f) Summary
formulaic expression:
gradations of voluntarily chosen closeness of conjunction
with God
= quality of human intelligence and abilities that God can give us = level of our
rational understanding of Divine Speech within Sacred Scripture = consistency of our effort in applying doctrine of truth from Sacred
Scripture to our daily willing and
thinking
Note the bottom line in this equation.
Closeness to God and quality of human potential depends entirely on our daily
effort of changing the way we think and what we enjoy from our inherited
hellish traits. The doctrine of truth we properly extract from
Sacred Scripture tells us how to think and what to enjoy in order to get
closer to God and thereby be able to increase our human potential.
Sacred Scripture reveals that we are born with an inherited character that
contains numerous hellish traits. We also have numerous good traits by virtue
of the influx of good and truth into our mind (see Section xx). The
hellish traits we inherit in our natural mind tend to corrupt and invert the heavenly traits
that flow in moment by moment from our spiritual mind.
Every individual must therefore be willing to freely put up the voluntary effort of resisting the
old hellish traits and enjoyments, until eventually we come to loath them and
avoid them like the plague (see Section xx). As the hellish traits are
gradually rejected are extinguished, a new way of thinking
and feeling in our natural mind replaces the old. Now our natural mind is in
an orderly state that corresponds to and is in accordance with the heavenly order
in our spiritual mind. Then we can have the
good life that surpasses everything we could hope for or imagine. Denial of God through materialist philosophy and cynicism, is the negative
bias in science that puts us at a distance from God. In this orientation we cannot
receive directly anything good and true from Divine Speech as Sacred Scripture. But we still
receive things indirectly, such as the ability to think with common sense, and
the instinct of preservation and social cooperation. However this indirect
association with God is not powerful enough to overcome our inherited hellish
tendencies. God keeps control just as much as ever, but in this situation of
irrational denial or the love of disobedience, He allows the occurrence of evils in order to preserve
people's sense of freedom of choice (see Section xx). As long as people retain
this freedom to choose, they can change their mind and become human again. If
God took away this choice from people, they would no longer be human. Hence
God goes along and supports the irrational and evil plans and deeds of people,
even if this is not what He desires for them. Even so, God allows only those
evil thoughts and acts to occur, which He can turn into good for the victims
of the evil, including the perpetrator (see Section xx). All other thoughts or
plans or deeds of evil, God does not allow to occur or happen. It appears that
many people are
unwilling to put up the mental and emotional effort to change their inherited
character traits and weaknesses. As a result, God allows much evil and false
ideas to run amuck in society, making the lives of people a hell on earth, as
is indicated by the symptoms of crime, prejudice, injustice, abuse,
depression, ill health, ugliness, unhappiness, divorces, poverty, lack of
education, etc. All these evils are allowed by God in order to preserve the
freedom of all individuals to chose voluntarily to reform and to prepare for a
life of heaven in eternity -- or not. Those who fail to do so, can only experience a
life of hell in eternity (see Section xx). Swedenborg reports that once people
are settled in their hells of immortality, no one, or almost no one chooses to
leave those mental states. Better not get stuck there!
1.0.3.2
Part B: Degrees of
Conjunction with God
God provides two methods for the natural
mind to be conjoined with Him, and thereby to receive intelligence, love, and
energy in greater and higher degree, in proportion to our willingness to
conjoin with God the Divine Human. It is obviously important for us to
understand the mental procedure that allows us to conjoin more and more
closely to God, and gain access to all the benefits which God desires to
bestow on every human being.
God provides two methods for approaching
Him. Another way of saying this is that good and truth substances from the
Spiritual Sun enter our mental organs automatically, by God's laws of
correspondences, but what matters to us is how our organ reacts to it. We do
not experience the good and truth itself, which remains God's alone (see
Section xx). What we experience as sensation, thought, and feeling is the
reaction of our organ to God's good and truth inflowing into them. Our mental
organs react physiologically to the incoming spiritual heat (good) and
spiritual light (truth). This reaction is our experiencing of sensations,
thoughts, and feelings.
So what is ours, our immortal self, our
permanent unique identity and personality, is not God's inflowing substances
of good and truth, but our organ's unique way of reacting to them. These are
called the operations of our mental organs. "Mental operations" = states of
mental organs and their phases, occurring in reaction to inflowing spiritual
substances. These operations are ours, but not the substances that activate
them and maintain them in receptive form for receiving spiritual heat and
light inflowing from the Spiritual Sun.
The two methods of conjunction with God the Divine Human are both rational.
This fact is not widely known today except to those who study theistic
psychology. Many people today are led by the materialistic persuasion that God
wants to manifest Himself in the physical world and by sensuous experience of
Him in the form of witnessing a healing miracle and other acts of Divine grace
like touching sacred relics or carrying a talisman for luck. But these ideas
are not taught in Sacred Scripture. In fact,
the Writings Sacred Scripture give an explanation of this in the literal
sense, so it is easy to understand it. It has been mentioned before in earlier
Sections, and is mentioned throughout theistic psychology under the topic of
"sensuous vs. rational spirituality" (see Section xx). Prior to the modern
scientific civilization starting in the 18th century, most people could not
approach God by means of rational concepts. Therefore it was necessary for God
to perform miracles as a visible proof of His power and Presence. But this
limited the degree of conjunction possible between God and the conscious
rational and natural mind. Quoting from the Writings Sacred Scripture:
DP 131. From these
considerations it may be evident that faith [=knowledge of God]
induced by miracles is not faith but persuasion; for there is nothing
rational in it, still less anything spiritual, as it is only external
[=natural-rational ideas] without an internal [=spiritual-rational
ideas]. It is the same with all that a man does from this persuasive
faith, whether he acknowledges God, or worships Him at home or at church, or
performs good deeds. When a miracle alone leads a man to the acknowledgment
of God, to worship, and to piety, he acts from the natural man and not from
the spiritual. For a miracle infuses faith [=knowledge about God] by
an external and not by an internal way, thus from the world and not from
heaven. Now the Lord does not enter [=reception of spiritual-rational
truths] by any other way with man than the internal way [understanding
the correspondential sense], which is by the Word [=Sacred
Scripture], by doctrine and by preaching from it [=theistic
psychology]; and as miracles close up this way[=rational or
scientific knowledge of God], at this day [=prior to our
regeneration] no miracles are wrought. (DP 131)
Now in the modern
world of democracies almost everyone on the planet receives an education that
includes science and rational thinking about abstract concepts like everyday
management and business. All this was gradually brought about by God through
the advance of science, engineering, and rational thinking in society and
government. Since 1772, when Swedenborg published the last book of the
collection known as the Writings Sacred Scripture. From that moment on in the
history of the race, the rational heavens were created in every human being
already born, and will be in every human being to be born in the future.
Swedenborg witnessed the momentous
changeover in the mental world of humanity, when the old sensuous human
heavens were transformed and replaced by the new rational heavens. This event
marks the final and total completion of the creation of the human race (see
Section xx) From then on the approach to God, conjunction with Him, and
consequent benefits of heavenly immortality as conjugial couples, is possible
only by the approach of rational spirituality, not sensuous (see Section xx).
Now God is providing two methods of rational spirituality for conjunction
with Him -- conscience and Sacred Scripture.
Every individual is born with a conscience. There is an organ of
conscience within the cognitive and affective organs of the natural mind, from
where its operations originate in our conscious awareness (See
Section 7.0.4.1). You know the
popular expression "Listen to the voice of your conscience." But this is not a
sensuous, auditory voice. It is a rational voice or realization and insight.
Conscience is a human organ, not possessed by animals, that is based in the
natural-rational mind (see Section xx). From the rational mind we are able to
see and monitor what our sensuous mind is doing, a discrete degree below the
rational. When the sensuous mind is about to do something that is contrary to
good and truth, the rational mind is able to recognize the danger from a
rational perspective. Conscience reacts to that by correspondence, and we
immediately experience a cognitive and affective reaction. This is the "voice
of conscience" because we are consciously aware that we are thinking of doing
something that is contrary to good and truth (See
Section 7.0.4.1). God then maintains our mental
state in freedom, so that we may freely choose to listen or to ignore the
voice of conscience. This voice is heard by all human beings, regardless of
education or culture, because all human beings possess this mental organ.
Besides conscience, the other method of conjunction God provides is Sacred
Scripture. It requires rational thinking and understanding to be able to
relate to the meaning we get when reading or hearing about Sacred Scripture.
People who memorize Sacred Scripture but do not figure out what it means
logically and rationally, cannot derive benefits from it because all benefits
come from the meaning of it, and this is a rational activity. The physical
book of Sacred Scripture is not sacred at all and has no power to conjoin to
God; but only the meaning of its words and sentences in the minds of people
who think rationally of God and their relationship to Him. The degree of conjunction with God
through Sacred Scripture and through conscience, develops in the
conscious natural mind in three stages -- natural, spiritual, and celestial as
follows:
Stage 0. Conscious
Disjunction With God through the negative bias thinking
Based on hypothesis arising from sensory
experience and measurement Based on non-theistic persuasive teachings (e.g., science education,
socialization) Based on unwillingness to subordinate the human self to a higher power
(e.g., non-theistic humanism)
Stage 1. Natural,
External Conjunction With God
through natural-sensuous thinking and feeling about Sacred Scripture Stage 2. Spiritual,
Mediate Conjunction With God
through natural-rational thinking and feeling about Sacred Scripture Stage 3. Celestial,
Interior Conjunction With God
through spiritual-natural thinking and feeling about Sacred Scripture
The four stages described above are stages
of evolution in our thinking, in our rationality, in our consciousness. It is
the journey closer to God, and to our supreme human potentials. In the early
external stage of conjunction with God (stage 1), our thinking about God and the
things mentioned in Sacred Scripture is a natural way of understanding the
sentences -- their literal meaning in a historical, cultural, and religious
context. At stage 2, mediate conjunction is achieved through
understanding the ideas of Sacred Scripture less literally, more abstractly
and symbolically, hence more universally and less historically,
culturally, and theologically. Finally at stage 3, inmost conjunction with God is
achieved through the understanding of Sacred Scripture spiritually,
which refers to the recognition of spiritual-rational and celestial-rational
correspondences hidden within the natural meaning (see Section xx). What about stage 0 or disjunction with God? Actually, all four stages may be
going on within the same individual, but not at the same time of course. For
instance, John and Mary may be two students of theistic psychology who are
studying the spiritual concepts extracted from the Writings Sacred Scripture.
Their purpose is to gather the spiritual knowledge they need to undergo
character reformation so that they may become prepared for heavenly life in
eternity. Because they are cooperating with the Divine Psychologist they
experience enlightenment and are given an interior understanding, so that they may
see the concepts rationally. They are at stage 3 conjunction with God. After
studying, John and Mary decide to go out and have some fun. They end up at a
bar where they drink too much and got into fighting words with another couple
that started annoying them. They leave the bar and drive home. Along the way
they get into heavy traffic and they both end up swearing at another driver.
Etc. You can see from this type of common scenario that people typically vary
the degree of conjunction with God as they pursue their normal daily
activities. Character reformation can only
begin in adult life when we are mature enough to think for ourselves. Until
then we usually think from our undigested socialization and education
habits. We ingest our culture and knowledge but we do not digest it. To ingest knowledge and attitudes is to acquire them as habits and to do them
routinely out of habit. To digest knowledge and attitudes is to
appropriate them, to make them our own. This process of appropriation to self
only happens when we freely choose something after thinking about what it is
we prefer or like. When we reach adult life and some financial and political
independence, the future that lies ahead of us is ours -- which means that we
are more free to choose what we want, what we desire, what we love. Without being
able to choose what we love, we don't feel free. Until we feel free, we cannot
freely choose our life style, the things we believe within ourselves, the
things we support in our mind. When we reach this state of freedom to think in adulthood, we are capable of
beginning character reformation. This takes a lifetime of cooperation with the
Divine Psychologist (see Section xx). We undergo regeneration by means of
battles with the temptations that the Divine Psychologist brings to us by
arranging the environment appropriately and by managing our thinking and
feelings to face the temptations. This we do by fighting against the hells we
inherited using the weapons of the doctrine of truth we acquire from Sacred
Scripture or from conscience and education. Gradually through this procedure,
God builds a new character in our mind, one that is fit to live happily to
eternity in conjugial heaven (see Section xx).
1.0.3.3
Part C: Why This Is a
Perfect World Despite Evil
But what happens when we give in to
temptations, throw in the towel in the fight of good vs. evil, declare
ourselves free from God's commandments, religious rules, or the dictates of
our conscience? Note that this non-theistic or negative attitude (Stage 0)
could be temporary or permanent in any one individual. Note also that people
who practice a religion may do so spiritually or naturally. To practice
religion naturally means that you only let it affect your outward behavior and
not what you are thinking and feeling. This makes it impossible for the
Divine Psychologist to bring spiritual temptations to you because you would
not resist them -- which would harm your spiritual future (see Section xx).
The only way we can change our inherited hellish traits is to reject them
freely because they are contrary to conscience and Sacred Scripture. No other motivation
can succeed in altering how we think and feel inwardly, but only how we act
and talk outwardly. Swedenborg observed thousands of people who were recently resuscitated after
the death of their physical body (see Section xx). He interviewed many of them
concerning their knowledge and beliefs about God. They all were still able to recall
clearly their memories from earth, which we can do for awhile after
resuscitation, and before settling into our true personality, who we really
are (see "second death" Section xx). This evidence indicates that people after
resuscitation, thus in eternity, cannot hold on to their rules of conscience
and their religious beliefs when these were merely outward norms of conduct
that
they followed by habit, without independent examination.
Because they now rejected all rules of
religion, conscience, morality, and respectability they felt completely free
to feel, think, and do whatever they felt like spontaneously, uncritically
(See Section 7.0.4.1).
And because they had not undergone temptations and character reformation,
their inherited tendencies and loves for evil and cruel things now took over
completely, and they turned into an immortal life of hellish pursuits,
delights, and sufferings.
On the other hand, Swedenborg observed some
people after their resuscitation, who had no religion of any kind, but had had a strong sense of
conscience and natural morality and respect for others, for animals, and for
nature. When they were told and taught about God and Sacred Scripture, they
were instantly able to understand it rationally, and were able to enter the
life of conjugial heaven to eternity. If
we consider the state of our civilization and society today it is obvious that
there is more disjunction with God than conjunction. God has created a perfect
system and is maintaining it in perfect order. This is His omnipotence,
omniscience, and omnipresence (see Section xx). People look at crime, social
disorder, human unhappiness everywhere, and they conclude that either there is
no God, or that God is not omnipotent, or that God is both good and evil.
These are all false conclusions. In fact, society is perfect for its spiritual
purpose or goal, and God is
maintaining it in perfect order for that purpose, since God is omnipotent to
carry out what He wants and plans. The difficulty has
been for people to see rationally that society and life on earth has a higher
purpose related to our immortality. Crime and disasters cannot reduce or take
away from this purpose. Crime and human selfishness do make our experience on
earth more ghastly, But this experience does not interfere with why we are
here. God will not allow anything to interfere with this purpose.
The perfection of society as maintained and controlled by God, is that it
gives people a life in which at any moment they can begin their character
reformation and preparation for eternal happiness in heaven.
No one is excluded. Everyone has an equal opportunity.
God maintains our ability to do and think
evil things just as he maintains our ability to think and do good things. If
God reduced our ability to think and do evil things, this would not be a
perfect world because we could not regenerate our inherited character and we would be
compelled to a life of eternal hell. At any
moment of our daily willing and thinking, the Divine Psychologist puts us up
to a choice between choosing evil or good. The cumulative moment by moment
choices we make every hour, day by day, over the decades of our life on earth
-- millions of choices -- constitute our character. This is the vehicle of our
immortality. After our resuscitation we are immersed by the Divine
Psychologist into an intense life of recapitulation and self-discovery. All
societal shackles are cast off in absolute liberty when we fully realize that
we are now immortal, in a world where we are free to exercise our desires and
loves whatever they are. Now at last, without social pressure,
responsibility, expectations, and rules of conscience, we can be whatever our
feelings and thinking prompt us to be -- purely selfish, totally egocentric,
wild and mad, cruel and obsessive, prompt to extremes and excesses of any kind
whatsoever. These feelings and imaginings now create a hellish environment
around us, where we continue our life with others who are similar to us (see
Section xx). When we think about it now, it
is clear that we should avoid at all cost from ending our life on earth with a
hellish personality on the inside, even if we have a civilized personality on
the outside. This is God's purpose in
providing revelation of spiritual truths in the form of Sacred Scripture,
namely, to allow us to see rationally that we must undergo regeneration of
character in order to have a heavenly life in eternity. And as well, to teach
us the techniques that are effective in this regeneration effort -- how we are
to cooperate with the Divine Psychologist to reciprocate, and thus to conjoin
with Him. By acknowledging
God, by studying Divine Speech as Sacred Scripture, we become enlightened so
that we can acquire doctrine of truth with which to resist temptations and
consequently to
be conjoined with God through willing what is good and thinking in accordance
with our rational understanding of truth.
1.0.4
Topic 4: Forms of Divine Speech in
Our Conscious Natural Mind
Divine Speech proceeds from God's Mind and
propagates itself instantaneously across the entire universe in the form of
spiritual light and heat, which enters every human mind from its third heaven,
and descends by discrete degrees (see Section xx) into all the regions of the
mind. The following is a listing of the levels or degrees of the action of
Divine Speech in human minds, starting with the most universal and least
conscious, and increasing in consciousness and effectiveness, all the way to
the highest level of the mind, which is the closest potentially to God.
I human instincts of mutual
empathy, sympathy, cooperation, affiliation, curiosity, inventiveness
II daily moods of high and low,
clear and foggy, receptive and resistive, peaceful and conflictual
III character, personality,
norms of conduct, ethics, and lifestyle developed through
socialization, enculturation, education, training, experience
IV inner voice of conscience,
civilized morality, allowed vs. taboo, right vs. wrong
V the Letter of Sacred
Scripture as religion, history, culture -- often distorted and
corrupted, leading to sectarianism and conflict
VI interior sense extracted
from Sacred Scripture as theistic science or theistic
psychology, which is universal and not historical, cultural, or religious As you can see from the above listing, Divine Speech is present with every
human being at different levels of closeness and conjunction. It is not until
we reach level IV that we are conscious of God as a force that is higher than
our own. At level V we are introduced to a personal and conscious relationship
with God, but it's not until level VI that we form a genuine and uncorrupted
awareness and relationship with God on a daily basis.
1.0.5
Topic 5: Sensuous vs. Rational
Spirituality
1.0.5.1
Part A:
Why Doesn't God Make an Appearance at the United
Nations? Swedenborg was able to observe the character
and life of every generation of people that had lived on earth, and then
passed on to their life of immortality in eternity, either in their heavens or
their hells, where Swedenborg was able to observe them. Since in this way
Swedenborg had access to a cross section of all the people that had lived on
earth, he was able to describe objectively and empirically the evolution of
human consciousness across time. He discovered that the earliest generations,
or the "Most Ancient" civilization on earth, was made of a celestial human
race that now dwelt separately in their own human heavens, which are different
from the heavens Swedenborg visited that belonged to the generations that came
after the celestial race (see Section xx). The celestial race eventually had died out on earth due to their inability to
continue in their type of mind called celestial. Their brain was whole, while
the spiritual race that succeeded them had split-brains, left and right
portions, as we know it from our own race today. The switch over in evolution
occurred sometime near the beginning of recorded history, possibly around
10,000 BC (though Swedenborg does not give precise dates).
The whole-brained celestial race had a
united will (affective organ) and understanding (cognitive organ), unlike us
who have the will and the understanding capable of acting independently. We,
the split-brained spiritual race, are capable of thinking one thing
(corresponding to the left brain) and willing its opposite (right brain
correspondence). We can learn with our understanding what is the right way to
think and act, and we can ignore this with our will and do the opposite. The
celestial whole-brained race was not capable of this. They were unable to lie
or simulate, hence unable to deceive others and do them evil. Swedenborg
talked to them in their ancient heavens and was able to confirm their
character as different from ours, completely innocent and ignorant of all evil
(except for a few among them who are in their hells.)
The celestial race people were able to talk
to their departed family members and teachers, who spoke to them from their
heaven, instructed the people on earth, and sometimes imposed punishment on
them to chastise them from any tendency to do or think evil. In other words,
the celestial people on earth were dual citizens consciously. Like
Swedenborg's unique experience (see Section xx) the celestial race had their
spiritual mind activated and conscious, whereas the spiritual race that came
afterwards, had their spiritual mind completely unconscious. From then on, the
only source of knowledge of the afterlife of eternity was through revelation
in Sacred Scripture. Swedenborg was able to read in the spiritual world the
various versions of Sacred Scripture that the subsequent generations had
received from God.
The conscious ability to communicate with
God or the people in the afterlife is called sensuous spirituality, whereas
the knowledge of God through the revelation of Sacred Scripture is called
rational spirituality. It is crucial that we understand the difference because
it is not possible today for the spiritual split-brain race to have direct
sensuous spiritual awareness or communication with God or the people in the
afterlife. There may be some exceptions to this rule (see Section xx). An example of direct sensuous awareness of God or of spiritual things would be
if God appeared today in physical space and time. For instance, God might
appear at the United Nations or on the world TV stations, introduce Himself,
give a speech, make some miracles, and even stay around so people can
interview Him and make movies and recordings. This never happened and will
never happen. Why not? There are two fundamental reasons you need to know
about.
First, our relationship to God necessarily involves our rational mind,
which is also called the spiritual mind (see Section xx). Everyone is born
with an organ in the rational portion of the mind called heaven. Hence our
relationship to God develops through truths and rationality from within our
mind, not sensuous evidence or interaction on the exterior of our mind. God
appearing in the streets or at the United Nations would be only an external
relationship through the bodily senses and natural mind. This cannot remain in
the afterlife, which is a world of rational ether, of truths, hence in the
interior of the human mind, not in the exterior senses. The
second fundamental reason why God does not appear at the United
Nations or on the streets meeting people, is that whatever God would say would
be expressed in natural languages by correspondences, just like Sacred
Scripture is the natural language correspondence of Divine Speech. Divine
Speech is nothing but Divine Truth, and this is nothing but God's thoughts and
reasoning, or Divine Wisdom, which is infinite and omniscient (see Section
xx). Whatever God thinks is Divine Truth. This is spiritual light proceeding
from the Spiritual Sun and permeating the mental world of the human race, that
is, the mental organs of every individual. Divine Speech first enters the
highest portion of the spiritual mind where those who dwell in their Third
Heaven in eternity, become conscious of the proceeding. This conscious
awareness of Divine Speech is the closest meaning or understanding the human
race can have of God. This meaning is conveyed by means of
"celestial-rational" correspondences (see Section xx).
Then Divine Speech or Truth, descends into the next layer of the human mind
where those who dwell in their Second Heaven in eternity, become conscious of
it in the form of "spiritual-rational" correspondences. Then Divine Speech
continues to descend and exteriorize throughout the human mind, where it
becomes conscious to those who dwell in the First Heaven of their mind in
eternity, through "spiritual-natural" correspondences. From there Divine
Speech or Truth exteriorizes still further, and becomes conscious to the
natural mind through its levels of operation -- natural-rational
correspondences, natural-sensuous and corporeal correspondences. This is
where most people first become aware of God --through the natural
correspondences and meanings in Sacred Scripture expressed in a natural
language (see Section xx). See the
Layers Diagram. So what would happen if God met you on the streets or gave an interview to
journalists and scientists at the United Nations, or came to the University of
Hawaii and taught this course in Theistic Psychology? God would speak from His Own Mind and Divine Speech would flow down from His
Divine Mind, through the human heavens, and finally would be heard by you in
your natural language. The meaning of His sentences would be constructed of
natural meanings, words, and concepts. People might be terribly disappointed!
All they would hear, over and over again, is what Divine Speech has been
telling the human mind since the beginning of creation. It would sound to them
that God is not talking to them, but just quoting Sacred Scripture, again and
again. People would hear different things, each in their own language and
thought level. Some people who are regenerating by means of Divine Speech from
Sacred Scripture, will hear more interior ideas in what God is saying, but
those who are in the negative bias mode of thinking about God, will hear nothing
but what they already believe. So you can see that God cannot just burst unto the scene and give proof of His
existence, and command people to do this or that. For He has already been
doing this in Sacred Scripture, and those who are unwilling to acknowledge
Sacred Scripture as Divine Speech in correspondences, will not change their
mind when God appears in their living room and talks to them. God wants us to know
the rational methods by which He creates and manages the details of our lives
and the universe. God wants us to know the anatomy and physiology of our
mental organs so that we can take care of them appropriately. God has created
our mind in such a way as to be capable of being conjoined with His Mind, and
thereby we might be alive forever and never die. This amazing feat is
accomplished through the spiritual substances of heat and light streaming
forth from God (see Section xx), and permeating the mind of every human being,
from the top of its anatomy, to the bottom.
This spiritual heat is called "Divine Love,"
and our affective mental organ called the will, was designed by God to be able
to react to it, so that we have the subjective conscious life experience of
willing something, like willing to lift our hand, or touch this or that, or
ignore this or that. This free will as subjective experience is what gives us
the living sensation of being conscious and alive. And it is activated in us
by spiritual heat flowing in from the top of our mind. Should this flow of
spiritual heat stop for an instant, we would experience the sensation of
dying, and we would actually disappear from existence. It is this inflowing
spiritual heat that makes us alive, keeps us alive, instant by instant, from
birth to endless immortality and eternity. In
the same way spiritual light flows into our cognitive organ, activates it, the
result being our subjective experience of self-conscious thinking, reasoning,
understanding, talking about it, etc. This is the subjective experience that
gives us content, meaning, culture, hence rational human beings capable of
intelligent planning and imagining.
You can see from this physiological
description that we are human beings from the inflow of Divine Love and Divine
Truth, which activate our mind and give us the moment by moment continuity of
our consciousness of self as a unique individual or person. The split-brained spiritual race has two brains (left and right) because the
physical structure reflects and corresponds to the mental structure, namely
the split-mind in the form of the affective and cognitive organs having
independent function. It was necessary that the race following the
whole-minded celestials be split-minded, as the spiritual human race now is,
so that people could learn spiritual truth through written Sacred Scripture,
even though their inherited tendency was to rebel against that truth and
to want to ignore it or reject it.
This is how we are today. We hear about
God's commandments and we sense our conscience (See
Section 7.0.4.1). In this way we learn about
spiritual truth -- what our fate is to be in the the endless eternity of our
afterlife. How we should be preparing for it to make sure it is a heavenly
life instead of hellish. We take this into our knowledge and our
understanding. We don't feel like following it, and we don't for the most
part. Yet we know the truth as it has been revealed by God to us. This is the
essence of the spiritual race: to have this choice. To know the revealed truth
of God and to follow it or not. This is the freedom that God maintains in
every human mind from birth to eternity. It is the perfection and the
guarantee, that at any instant that we wish or choose, we can join our
will to the understanding of truth -- which means to will the things that our
understanding knows is good and right. We
do not have the power to do anything at all since all power is in God's
omnipotence, which cannot be given away to a human being or to nature (see
Section xx). But God wills to have things happen according to how we
consciously will or choose. This shows you how close God is to the
individual, how intimate our relationship is, much more so than any two human
beings can have with each other. 1.0.5.2
Part b (ii)
What About the Paranormal, Miracles, Telepathy, Magic? Various people and traditions have attempted to prove the existence of the
afterlife relying on paranormal data and research. An example is the book
titled An Amazing Experiment (1961) by Charles Drayton Thomas and
available online at:
www.survivalafterdeath.org/books/thomas/contents.htm To me it is
quite obvious that no such proof is scientifically believable because the data
are so scant, impoverished, and practically non-existent. And of course, it is
irrational and illogical to try to give physical proof for what is not
physical. All paranormal phenomena are measured and explained in terms of
energy of various kinds, and these are based on quantity, time, and space.
Rational ideas are based on mental sates in eternity, outside time, without
space, extension, quantity, number, or shape. Such are our feelings, emotions,
ideas, thoughts, sensations -- they are all mental, spiritual, timeless,
eternal states and operations (see Section xx). It is the same with "medical miracles." One can never prove that God exists by
classifying an observed physical event as evidence for a spiritual reality.
Some people may be persuaded of God's existence by witnessing an event that
cannot be explained medically, but this kind of persuasive belief is rejected
by people after resuscitation, when they discover that they are now living in
the eternity of the afterlife, in all its sensuous living experience (see
Section xx). However they cannot hold on to rationality and sanity because
their belief is based on a sensuous idea of God, not rational and spiritual.
In the afterlife, sensuous ideas act like gravity objects in air or water --
they sink to the lowest bottom. The bottom of the human mind is called our
hellish traits. We sink into our hellish traits, and we get rid of all of
their heavenly traits, for which they have no use, and to which they react
with fear and hate.
It is the same with magic, sorcery, ghosts,
science fiction, etc. -- they are all natural ideas about physical energy,
time, space, place. They are not spiritual because they are sensuous rather
than rational ideas. All spiritual ideas must be rational ideas, for the two
are the same (see Section xx).
The Swedenborg Reports on the other
hand are rational ideas, rational explanations, and rational observations.
From age 57 to 84 Swedenborg was conscious in his natural mind as well as his
spiritual mind, which is also called the rational mind (see Section xx).
Note that we could not have accepted these reports if Swedenborg had claimed
that he had seen visions on earth, or interacted at a distance with people on
earth or in the world of spirits through his natural mind. If this had
been Swedenborg's claim, then he would have been diagnosed with psychotic or
delusional disorders. But this was not his claim. Rather, Swedenborg claimed
that his spiritual mind was opened or operationalized prior to his death. He
continued to maintain that it was impossible for the natural mind to have any
information about the spiritual world. It is
rational to think that Swedenborg could observe the afterlife of eternity with
his spiritual mind, but sensuous to think that he could do this with his
natural mind. The latter is impossible. The former is possible.
Part B:
Sensuous Consciousness of God Does Not Remain in the Afterlife This amazing
closeness is hidden from our direct sensuous awareness. We cannot show any
direct evidence of it to someone else or even to ourselves. Anyone can deny
God's presence, so hidden is it from our sensuous awareness. God will not
appear at the United Nations, will not give an interview, will not appear to
anyone on the street or a building, will not cause you to hear a sonorous
voice your physical ears could hear, etc. God will not allow you to have a
sensuous awareness of Him through your physical body and senses.
Instead, God wants us to rationally acknowledge His Presence in our
mind and life.
This becomes clear when you consider the
physiological fact that heaven is inside our rational mind (see
Section xx). This was different for the celestial race, who now dwell in their
celestial heavens, which Swedenborg was allowed to visit. Their celestial race
heaven, which are separate and inaccessible to our heavens, is built
physiologically within their sensuous mind, which is governed by the affective
organ (the will) in conjunction with the cognitive organ (understanding). But
the physiology of the human race was drastically evolved or altered when the
spiritual race came into being. The heavens of the human race were now built
up differently, inside the cognitive organ (understanding). The affective
organ, which was hellish by inheritance since the Fall (see Sections xx), had
to be regenerated or recreated through the battles of temptations, in which we
fight for our life with the truth in our understanding (see Section xx). We
must win this battle in order to be "saved" for heavenly life in eternity. It
is the only way we can acquire heavenly traits, that is, by giving up
voluntarily and getting rid freely of the hellish traits that we were born to
enjoy and hang on to as dear life itself. When we are regenerating, the Divine Psychologist is constructing our heavenly
eternity within our cognitive organ (our understanding), and creates a new
affective organ (our will) within that.
Thus, our life of eternity is now actuated
by a rational conjunction with God through Sacred Scripture. God's presence in
our mind is something we learn rationally, by constructing rational and
scientific concepts that we acquire through study of Sacred Scripture and
reflection upon it. It would destroy our ability to think of God's presence
rationally if we had sensuous evidence of His Presence. The sensuous and
the rational oppose each other in our mind.
As proof of this inherent opposition,
Swedenborg interviewed people in the world of spirits shortly after their
resuscitation, and discovered that some people had acquired a "persuasive"
belief of religion based on a sensuous or physical presence of God. They
acquired this persuasive belief through observing demonstrations of what
appeared to them to be miracles performed by healers and "holy men." Or
else, they experienced visions of God or angels, as in Near Death Experiences
(NDEs) (see Section xx). These "miraculous" events were seen as proof of God's
physical presence in the world, and from this they believed in God.
Note that this physical demonstration of
God's Presence is a sensuous spirituality, while rational spirituality is to look around and to see the splendor and intelligence of
nature, and seeing that as a miracle, because it is from God's omnipotence and
not from itself. Rational spirituality conjoins with God, but sensuous
spirituality disjoins us from God.
The freshly resuscitated people that
Swedenborg interviewed, mentioned above, demanded to be taken to heaven and to
God's Court. But they were told by wise bystanders that God is nowhere to be
found but in Sacred Scripture, or more precisely, in the rational
understanding we acquire from Sacred Scripture. God is in that rational
understanding that we form of the revelation of Divine Speech, but only to the
extent that we intend and do that truth, that is, to the extent that we live
according to the truth that we understand. Those newly resuscitated people walked away in dismay when they heard the
above. They kept their search up for God and heaven until finally they were
led away by clever charlatans who prey upon such people in the world of
spirits, meet them, pose to them as holy men who can do miracles, and promise
to lead them to God and the Kingly Throne. At last they are led away into the
entrapments of the hells where they become slaves to manipulating charlatans,
and thereby experience a miserable existence.
Amazingly, Swedenborg discovered that they
were unwilling to give up that life in the hells of their evil persuasions and
insane fantasies. Isn't that amazing? They were not kept there as punishment
for their misdeeds or false beliefs. They themselves, out of the free will God
never removes from anyone, keep themselves in their hells. When they are
exposed to the slightest rational suggestion or good intention, they become so
enraged and insane that their miserable situation actually worsens. This is
because nothing is as strong in their mind as their hatred for God, their
disgust for heaven, their aversion for what is good, innocent, altruistic,
loyal, wise. Hating these things so much, they are unwilling to exit from the
hells of their mind since the only alternative is the heavens in their mind.
There is no other existence in eternity, only heaven or hell. People have both
in their mind, so it is their choice that keeps them in one or the other state
of eternity. With this type of evidence it is
clear now why God won't appear to you in a vision, or on TV, or at the United
Nations making a speech to the people of earth! It is also clear that real
miracles are only those that run things as they are. For instance, it is a
miracle when I get home every day after a half hour drive in traffic. It is a
miracle of God that keeps those cars from hitting each other a thousand times
more than actually happens. It is a miracle that God speaks to us in our
rational understanding when we read Sacred Scripture as Divine Speech. It is a
miracle when we resist a temptation, strengthen our resolve, feel closer to
God as a result. It is a miracle that each one of us is going to be
resuscitated and carry on a life of immortality. We have
to discover ourselves as organic human beings belonging to an organic race. We
are like a single vine that, over the ages, has populated an entire rocky
island. It is just one vine, from one seed dropped by a bird, that fell into a
crack in the rock, survived, and eventually covered the entire available area.
You can walk around the island and you will see that each part of this vine is
different in appearance, having had to adapt to different climatic conditions.
And even a single leaf or flower that you may examine, is unique in form,
shape, texture, size, biochemical condition, and even genetic, molecular, and
sun-atomic structure. Each is unique.
In the Writings Sacred Scripture, Divine Speech has
revealed to humankind that no two created things of any size of comparison,
can be the same. And it is explained that this is because God is infinite.
Whatever God creates from Himself through the infinite substances of the
Spiritual Sun, must retain the infinity of God within itself. This is
the source and cause for every created thing coming into being, existing, and
subsisting over time and activity.
This is why every object, of any size, is unique.
The vine that populated the entire surface of the island
is actually composed of myriads of unique individual elements. All these
unique elements are differentiated from each other. Each element or individual
particle possesses its unique identity. Even though there is only one vine,
all its elements are uniquely differentiated to make up this one vine.
This vine is the human race.
1.0.5.3
Part C: We
are Dual Citizens in Discrete Layers
A complete
human being is created by conception and birth, according to the Writings
Sacred Scripture. The
unique individual or person who is created by conception and birth, is created
simultaneously into two worlds. One world is temporary, the other is
permanent. The temporary physical body created into a natural world in time
and space, and the permanent spiritual body created into the mental world of
eternity, outside time and space.
The spiritual body, also called the mental body, is organic, like the physical body.
Both bodies are made of the sun in their world. Our physical body is made of
matter from the natural sun of this earth. Our mental body is made of mental
substances from the Spiritual Sun, which is the entry point from infinite God
into finite creation. From the Spiritual Sun there is constant and ceaseless
streams proceeding into the finited universe, creating the spiritual world.
This is the inner world, the mental world, the human mind and its organs.
Then, as the proceeding spiritual substances descend and continue to
externalize away from the central Spiritual Sun, the natural universe is
created through the sun in each galactic zone or space. So when we are born
our physical body is attached by correspondence or functional bond, to our
mental body.
The physiology of this mind-body attachment has been
revealed to us in Divine Speech, as we can read in the Writings Sacred
Scripture. The mental body has three organs called affective, cognitive, and
sensorimotor. These mental organs are constructed out of the rational and
immortal substances proceeding from the Spiritual Sun. This is why we are born
immortal beings. What we call our mind or self as a person, is nothing else
physiologically, than the operations of these three organs in the mental body.
Our feelings are subjective experiences we have when the affective organ is
stimulated by incoming streams from the Spiritual Sun. In other words, as the
spiritual heat and light from the Spiritual Sun stream out into the created
universe, they permeate the mental world of the human race. The affective
organ is built to react to incoming spiritual heat, while the cognitive organ
is built to react to incoming spiritual light.
The operations of the affective organ cause us to have
the mental experience of feelings, intentions, preferences. The operations of
the cognitive organ cause us to have the mental experience of thinking and
being conscious. The operations of the affective organ cause us to have the
mental experience of afferent sensations and efferent determinations to act in
the physical body.
Note that the physical body is in an external world of
time, while the mental body is in a timeless and spaceless, or eternal, world.
The sensory organs and brain in our physical body react to electro-chemical
activities of physical particles or cells reflecting our physical surrounding
as it impinges upon the body. Every tiny action of every tiny particle in this
physical process, is a correspondential “copy” of a parallel tiny action in
the spiritual world or the mind. The proceeding control system from the
Spiritual Sun determines every co-action between something in the spiritual
world and its parallel in the natural world. The two worlds are bonded,
connected, co-determined by the stream proceeding from the Spiritual Sun and
permeating the entire created universe, spiritual-mental in spaceless
eternity, and natural-physical in time-space.
We are dual citizens, living in both worlds from birth
until the death of the physical body. At that point the connection between our
individual mind and the physical world, is broken or terminated forever. From then on all the proceeding input is spiritual, whereas before, it was
spiritual and natural.
There is no possible connection between the two worlds
except by functional correspondence. It is not possible for something to go
from world into the other world. Everything created in its own world stays in
that world. There is no transfer between the two worlds. When our connection
to the physical universe is broken, the natural mind that was active prior to
death, is now inactivated or becomes unconscious, though this takes a lengthy
process and is not instantaneous, as Swedenborg reports from his multiple
observations (see Section xx). Prior to death, our spiritual mind was active
from the proceeding stream, as explained above, but it was unconscious. None of
its activity was available to our conscious awareness.
But when the spiritual mind activates the natural mind,
we become conscious of feelings, thoughts, and sensations. The memories we
have of our life on earth are recorded in every single detail, in the natural
mind where are located the affective, cognitive, and sensorimotor organs of
the natural mind. These three organs in the natural mind cannot operate on
their own. They cannot communicate with the sensory input form the physical
body. They are dead, unless they are activated by the spiritual stream coming
from the unconscious spiritual mind. When the natural mind responds to this
influx, we have the subjective experience of being conscious, having thoughts
we are aware of, and having feelings, intentions, motives. The experience we
have is that these thoughts and feelings are “our very own” and that they
originate in our conscious life in the natural mind. And when we think about
analytically and abstractly, we may come to the conclusion that the natural
mind originates from the sensory experience in the physical body.
But as Divine Speech describes our created mental anatomy
and physiology, the human mind is constructed in discrete layers, or levels,
like an office building without stairs or elevators. The people on the various
floors can communicate with each other, but they cannot mingle. The levels of
our mental operations are bonded together in action. They cannot act on their
own. They always are compelled to act in unison. God does the compelling, and
the surveying, and managing of every detail. Nothing can work or operate
without this permanent and continuous immediate management by God.
When we are disconnected from our physical body, we have
the experience of being “resuscitated,” which means being consciously
awakened, as if from a dream. Swedenborg observed this resuscitation process
thousands of time during his daily life in both worlds for 27 years (see
Section xx). When people are “resuscitated,” they awaken in the memory and
activity of their natural mind. This is for rational continuity so what is
happening to us can make sense. Swedenborg talked to many people who have been
just resuscitated. He calls them “novitiate spirits.” The majority of those in
his era (spanning the 17th and 18th century) were apparently “astonished” that
they were now alive in the spiritual world, and that they had their entire
body as before. Quickly they discover that it is now an immortal body of
spiritual substances.
This mental body has vastly more powers and abilities
than our physical body. This makes sense when you think that the spiritual or
mental body exists in rational ether from the Spiritual Sun; while the natural
or physical body exists in physical space and matter from the natural sun. For
instance, we may want to switch weather when it is raining, to fit with our
afternoon plans. But we cannot wish the rain away. The rain is physical and
the wish is mental. The mental has power over the physical by correspondence
only, never directly. So the only way we can act upon the physical world is by
mentally doing that which corresponds physically. We can move our hand or our
body parts when we so desire and think. This is because there are built in
correspondences between intentions in the affective organ, thoughts in the
cognitive organ, and efferent motor determinations in the sensorimotor organ.
1.0.5.4
Part D: There is Only One Mental
World in the Human Race
But the correspondences that determine the weather are
not available to our mental operations. Only God changes the weather in
correspondence with planned purposes, ecologies, histories, and biographies.
All of it is panned in advance by God and the plan becomes reality when God
activates the built in correspondences. But in the mental world of eternity
there is no physical weather system, no geological layout or land mass created
by physical forces. Everything in the mental world is created by the mind!
You can easily understand this when you think about your
dreams, fantasies, imaginations, and made up stories. You are in full control
of events, including the weather. Why? Because these events are mentally
constructed in mental world of imagination and invention. Our dreams can be
strikingly vivid and detailed. Our feelings and thoughts create dramatic
scenes that look and feel normal. We make up characters that talk to us. We
can make them scare us, or embrace us, leave us, or come back. Everything in
the mental world is controlled by our feelings and thoughts – what it is that
we want happening.
But there are rules of correspondences in both worlds.
Swedenborg observed that when people are resuscitated, they attract other
people who are like them, who come around and have interactions. This tendency
is so forceful that people gather together in cities that are mental
recreations from memory, like in a dream. The difference is that in a dream
you appear to be the only one making up the events and characters. But what
would happen if people’s dreams started getting mixed up so that everybody’s
dream took place in the same dream world. It would be frightening. I am in
your dream, you are in my dream, we are in other people’s dreams – we no
longer have control over the dream world, but only a tiny portion of it, that
portion that we are making up.
That’s exactly how Swedenborg described the spiritual
world, which is the objective mental world in which everybody’s thoughts and
feelings played themselves out. It is the world of eternity because dreams,
thoughts, and feelings are operations of our mental organs, which exist not in
space, not in time, not in physical matter, but in spaceless, timeless,
rational ether forming eternity.
The spiritual heat and light proceeding from the
Spiritual Sun into the mental world of humanity, jointly create the objective
spiritual world of the human mind. In other words, every person’s mental
organs are in the same mental world. In fact, there is only one mental world!
What an amazing revelation. You are in my mental world when you are in your
mental world, and I am in your mental world when I am in my mental world. This
is exactly what we are used to with the physical body. You are in this
restaurant and I am in this restaurant and a down other people are in this
restaurant. There is only one restaurant in which these people now are.
We can understand that. The restaurant has space for all
these people, so all these people can be in this restaurant at the same time.
It would be the same if people could merge their dreams into one dream world
where all the dreams take place. Then I can dream of a restaurant, and you and
a dozen other dreamers can be in it because my dream and their dream are in
the same dream world. We can meet each other there. Every human being who is
dreaming a dream, can meet with every other human being who is also dreaming –
as long as there is only one dream world where people can do their dreaming
and create events and objects in the dream.
This is what Swedenborg discovered: that there is only
one mental world for humankind.
Furthermore, he discovered that this mental world is
the world of the afterlife and eternity!
It’s hard to imagine anything more stupendous than this
reality!
We can memorize these ideas with a formula:
mental world
= spiritual world = afterlife = eternity
You can clearly see now that you are born to be immortal.
Your mental world begins when you take your first breath (see Section xx).
That’s when you become conscious of sensations. A few weeks later, we become
conscious of thoughts and feelings. We are beginning to form a self, a
personhood. We are becoming part of the human race. Our mental world appears
private. We are alone in it, in comparison to our physical world where we see
and interact with social others. So we grow up with the natural mind forming
the idea or hypothesis that we are alone in our mental world. We follow the
sensuous principle of “Out of sight, out of mind.” In other words, no one
seems to be in our own private mental world, hence there is no one there. But
this may only be an appearance or illusion.
Swedenborg became conscious in his spiritual mind at age
57, as already explained. We become conscious of our spiritual mind only when
we are resuscitated, at the death of the physical body. But he was given this
special mission by God which was, to reveal the scientific and rational facts
about the human mind and God. Until this time, no one could know anything
about the afterlife, the spiritual world, or the anatomy and physiology of the
mind (see Section xx). How could God reveal these scientific facts to the
modern person? Not by direct entry into the physical world and creating a
university where God writes the curriculum and teaches to people. This would
only encourage a sensuous relationship with God here on earth. It would be
temporary. When people pass into the spiritual world, whatever they believed
or conceptualized about God sensuously, disappears.
As explained in several locations in Theistic
Psychology (see Section xx), sensuous rationality tied to the corporeal
mind and physical body, does not survive because it is located in the natural
mind, and these mental organs are de-activated or put to sleep and are no
longer functioning in our life of immortality. We awaken in our spiritual
mind, which is a discrete degree or level above the natural mind. Nothing
whatsoever of the natural can enter there or exist there. This is why God does
not make an appearance at the United Nations or on the streets of the cities,
as He did during the Incarnation Event (see see Sections
1.6.8 and
1.8.4.2 and
1.8.6 and
2.19
and
3.7.2.2
and
3.10.1 and
4.4.5
and
4.4.6.1 and
5.0.6 and
5.1.1.5.1 and
13.0.11.1.1). That event was an
evolutionary change in the spiritual mind of the human race (see Section xx).
Specifically, the Divine Human was embodied in a Physical
Body, which God rendered suitable for His Human Divine Spiritual Body, which
He always possessed from eternity. By rendering this Divine Physical Body
suitable for the Divine Spiritual Body, God thereby brought about an
evolutionary change in the levels of the human race. He created the new
Rational Heavens in every human mind then alive in either world, and in every
human mind that is born after that. Hence the human race was altered in a most
significant way. We might say that God finally completed the creation of the
human race. Until then we were not complete. Since then, the human race
contains a rational heaven in the affective organ at the highest level of the
mind.
It is absolutely necessary that we develop this potential
in us before we pass into the afterlife. When we are resuscitated, the kind of
life we have is determined by the idea we have of God, for all other ideas
depend on this chief idea. If we can tolerate and acquire rational ideas of
God, we can find a way to our heaven, and exist there forever. If we cannot
tolerate rational ideas of God, our consciousness automatically sinks down
into the lower levels where the natural mind is, with its sensuous concepts
and corporeal images obtained through the physical body. Instead of being able
to let go of all ideas based on time, space, number, quantity, we hang to
them, and we reject the rational ideas.
The result is spiritual insanity. This involves a
distorted mental physiology. When the spiritual heat and light from the
Spiritual Sun, immerses them in its stream, their affective organ reacts
hysterically and explosively, with extreme avoidance and compulsive rage.
Swedenborg was able to observe this many times over the 27 years of his daily
consciousness in the spiritual world. Sensuous ideas are opposed to rational
ideas. Hence their ideas were opposed to heaven and God in their mind. When
they were told some truth about God, they instantly denied it, and turned it
around into its opposite – which of course was false. Swedenborg performed
this experiment many times in different ways to make sure it is scientifically
valid (see Section xx).
So you may be sure that God will not appear on the
streets for the modern mind. Prior to the Incarnation Event, the human race
had a sensuous heaven only, which was suitable to the original celestial race
on earth (see see Sections
1.6.8 and
1.8.4.2 and
1.8.6 and
2.19
and
3.7.2.2
and
3.10.1 and
4.4.5
and
4.4.6.1 and
5.0.6 and
5.1.1.5.1 and
13.0.11.1.1). After the whole-brained celestial race had died out
due to spiritual abuses of the science of correspondences, God created a new
race called the split-brained spiritual race, of which we are members. This
race had a new heaven in their mind, which is why the old race and the new
race are segregated in eternity. Swedenborg however, was allowed to visit both
races.
The need for the human race to create rational concepts
of God and heaven led to the development of modern science. Today any modern
person is educated in science and analytical thinking. These scientific
concepts and attitudes make possible today the development of theistic
science. Now God can be taught in school, not as religion, but as science (see
Section xx). This would not have been possible before the Writings Sacred
Scripture, the last volume of which was published by Swedenborg in 1771.
Now that God can be a scientific and rational concept for
the basis of human thinking, every human being has the opportunity and ability
to develop their rational heavens while they are still living in a physical
body, and while still conscious in the natural mind. Every individual is
exposed to the rational ideas in the Writings Sacred Scripture so that they
may form their rational heavens through their idea of the Divine Human. People
either receive this instruction on earth in society, or in the world of
spirits, after their resuscitation. Every one is then instructed in the
rational concepts revealed in the Writings Sacred Scripture. Those who are
willing to abandon their hellish loves with its false ideas of God, are able
to open up their heavens and dwell there. But those who are unwilling, then
abandon their heavenly loves and rational ideas of God. They open up the hells
in their mind, into which they sink and immerse themselves with delight, as
witnessed by Swedenborg many times.
You now have the unusual opportunity to discover the
scientific concepts of God which God has revealed to humankind, barely 235
years ago through a Swedish scientist whose mind God had prepared for this
special mission (see Section xx).
For more on sensuous vs. rational spirituality see Section xx.
1.0.5.5
The Daily Discipline of Rational Spirituality
1.0.5.5.1
Recognizing Our Dual Existence
Quoting from the Writings Sacred Scripture:
HH 434. A man cannot think and will without
there being a subject that is a substance out of which and in which he can
think and will. Anything that is supposed to come into existence apart from
a substantial subject is nothing. This can be known from the fact that a man
is unable to see without an organ which is the subject of his sight, or to
hear without an organ which is the subject of his hearing. Apart from these
organs, sight and hearing are nothing and are not given existence.
The same is true of thought, which is an
internal sight, and of perception, which is an internal hearing; unless
these were in substances and from substances which are organic forms and
subjects, they would have no existence at all. From these things it can be
confirmed that man's spirit as well as his body is in a form, and that it is
in a human form, and enjoys sensories and senses when separated from the
body, the same as when it was in it, and that all the life of the eye and
all the life of the ear in a word, all the life of sense that man has,
belongs not to his body but to his spirit, which dwells in these organs and
in their minutest particulars.
This is why spirits see, hear, and feel, as well
as men. But after being loosed from the body, they do this not in the
natural world, but in the spiritual world. The natural sensation that the
spirit had, when it was in the body, it had by means of the material part
that was added to it; but even then it also felt spiritually in thinking and
willing. (HH 434)
We are mental beings existing simultaneously in time and
in eternity outside time.
We exist in time through the physical body and in
eternity through the mental body.
Our birth involves the coming into existence of a
physical body in time and a mental body outside time or in eternity. The
physical body and mental body are functionally connected through the universal
laws of correspondences. These Divinely created laws connect the two worlds of
creation – the world of time and the world of eternity.
The physical world is in time and space. Its matter
originates from stars that create gravitational fields or energies that
operate by fixed laws. The stars are also the source of matter, heat, light,
and through these, of planets and its weather systems. This arrangement of
things in the physical world of time is brought about and managed by the
arrangement of things in the mental world of eternity. Every single physical
phenomenon, object, or property, is nothing but the effect of some
corresponding mental source and cause. Everything that happens in the physical
world of time is a corresponding result to something that first happens in the
mental world of eternity.
For instance stars exist in the physical world of time
because the Spiritual Sun exists in the mental world of eternity. You will be
able to see the Spiritual Sun when your consciousness is no longer connected
to the physical body. This happens at death. Following that, we are
resuscitated, which occurs about thirty hours after the physical body is no
longer able to remain connected to the mental body. After resuscitation our
conscious awareness is entirely in the mental body. Now we begin our life of
immortality in eternity.
Emanuel Swedenborg (1688-1772), a Swedish scientist and
engineer, was prepared from childhood to develop a mind and character to be
able to receive, write, and publish new scientific revelations about the two
worlds and how they are interconnected by the laws of correspondences. At age
57 God appeared to Swedenborg and informed him of his Divinely appointed
mission as modern scientific revelator.
Swedenborg was then given the unique and unprecedented
ability of being conscious simultaneously in both worlds. No scientist in
human history has ever been given such an experimental laboratory which
allowed him to do experiments and view it simultaneously in its effects in
time and its prior cause in eternity. For the next 27 years, until his death
at age 84, he kept daily records, in Swedish and Latin, of his dualist
experiments. All his works were published and translated, and the English
translation today contains about 30 volumes of his reports on the world of
eternity.
Swedenborg observed thousands of people being
resuscitated shortly after the death of their physical body. He was able to
talk to all the people he had known and had passed into the afterlife.
Furthermore, he was able to talk to dozens of famous names he knew from
literature going back to thousands of years (e.g., Aristotle). He interviewed
people who had lived on this earth when human life first began, and despite
their ancient age their mental body appeared like the body they had on earth
in their adolescence.
Swedenborg discovered that the world of the afterlife is
in eternity, not in time. People often imagine their afterlife as coming back
on a new reconstructed earth in which they will live forever. They thus
imagine heaven to be on a physical planet in an immortal physical body.
Swedenborg proved that the afterlife is in eternity, outside the physical
world of time and space.
1.0.5.5.2
The Mental World is the World of Eternity
When people hear about their immortal life in “eternity”
and the “spiritual world,” they think of something obscure and without
content. They think it is something difficult to understand or be clear about.
But all this changes when you realize that eternity is something you are more
familiar with than you are with your kitchen or back yard. Eternity is nothing
else than the mental world, and what is more familiar to you than your mental
world of thoughts and feelings?
People are taught from the negative bias of science that
thoughts and feelings are in the brain. Few people go on to examine and
observe how irrational and unscientific this idea is. In order to see it and
to be able to prove that eternity is our familiar mental world, all you need
to do is to consider your dreams. Where are your dreams? Where is the space
and the objects in the restaurant you are dreaming eating in?
The space is instantiated by your imagination! In the
mental world we have the power to create instantly as much space we want, as
much wealth we want, as much fun we want – or, strangely enough, their
opposites – how frightened we can get, or miserable, or powerless. We can
create a heaven or a hell in our mind both while we are dreaming and while we
are awake. All this is familiar to you. What you did not know is that this
mental world is the same as the afterlife of eternity!
When we are born we exist as two connected bodies, one in
time, the other in eternity. Only the brain and its operations can be in time
and space. The sensations we have from our sensory organs are not in the
brain, not in the physical body, but in the mental body. Our thoughts and
feelings must exist in a non-material world that is outside space, time,
matter, energy, quantity, etc. Our sensations, thoughts, and feelings are not
material, not physical, not in space, not in time, not in matter. They are
spiritual, outside time and space, in a mental world that is eternal, because
not in time. Our mental life cannot exist in our physical body.
From birth onward, our physical body transmits
neuro-chemical and electro-physical signals to our brain, and there they
remain. The mental body is connected by correspondence to these physical
signals. We experience the sensation of an ice cube in the mouth after the
physical signal went from the mouth to the brain. The mental sensation occurs
simultaneously with the physical brain signal. If the brain malfunctions due
to disease or injury, the mental sensation will not be experienced. Once the
brain is dead however, and we are resuscitated in our mental body, we can
experience sensations far more intensely because the sensory environment in
the mental world is far more distinct than in the physical world – as you can
tell from vivid dreams and nightmares.
So our life of immortality begins when the physical body
is dead and the mental body now can experience the mental environment
exclusively. This environment differs greatly from the physical environment we
are familiar with here. On the surface the two worlds look alike because of
our ideas of the environment we must have to live. For instance, the
environment in your dreams may be normal or odd, but still it is made of
things we are familiar with – people, houses, books, beaches, horses, running,
eating, etc. The things in our dreams mostly make sense because they are the
things in our daily lives.
1.0.5.5.3
Our Life in Eternity
It is easy to understand therefore that our mental world
does not change much in appearance after death. Swedenborg reports that when
people are resuscitated they appear to themselves to be in the same place that
they died in – at home in bed, or a hospital, or battle zone. But this
appearance quickly begins to change and we realize that we are no longer in a
physical world. People seem to appear and disappear, houses and roads appear,
clothes seem to change automatically on our body, we mostly never think of
eating, and in any case, we soon realize we do not need to eat or drink to
live, for we are immortal. But if we do think about eating, food we want
suddenly appears on the table or in our hand, and it tastes very delicious.
Our life in the afterlife of eternity is social life with
others who are like us. People live in groups and societies made of
individuals who are similar in attitude and interest. It is the harmony and
similarity of thoughts and feelings that causes people to appear with each
other in groups and societies. This is completely an automatic sorting out
process that starts at resuscitation. There are two separate groupings or
collections of people in the afterlife, those who have heavenly thoughts and
feelings and those who have hellish thoughts and feelings. The heaven or hell
we live in is nothing else than the life we have inside our thoughts – a life
in mental heaven if our thoughts and feelings are heavenly, and a life in
mental hell if our thoughts and feelings are hellish.
While we are connected to the physical body it is
possible for us to build up our heavenly thoughts and feelings and their
hellish counterparts. At some point in our adult life we must start making
choices that are either heavenly or hellish. Every choice we make remains with
us into the afterlife. After resuscitation we go through a period of
discovering which choices we made and which ones we are willing to give up or
to keep. If we are willing to give up every single hellish choice, we enter
immortal life in heaven. If we are not willing to give up a single hellish
trait, we cannot enter heavenly life. Swedenborg reports that many people he
observed after their resuscitation, were unwilling to give up this or that
cherished attitude or pleasure, even if these were hellish. And so they gave
up all their heavenly traits to enter life in hell forever.
How do we know which traits are heavenly or hellish?
When we make a choice on the basis of what we love our
reasoning process immediately justifies the choice as good – even if it is
evil. For instance, when people enjoy listening to loud music or TV they want
to ignore how others are disturbed by it. They convince themselves that what
they are doing is right since it’s their home, or since it’s still not late in
the evening, or some other reason. Men can rape their dates and think that
they didn’t do anything wrong because the girl encouraged them. People can
drive drunk, kill someone, and convince themselves it’s not their fault.
People betray each other and think they have the right to do that.
There are so many contradictory religions and
philosophies because people want to call good that which they love, want, or
enjoy. And so how do we know which of our traits are heavenly and which
hellish? If we are wrong about this, it can costs us heaven or hell forever!
1.0.5.5.4
Why We Need Sacred Scripture
This is why it is absolutely necessary that God give
people guidelines and definitions of what is heavenly and what hellish. We
cannot rely on our own judgment. Hence it is that God gives Sacred Scripture
to the human race. This is the Divinely given definition and criterion for
what is good vs. evil, true vs. false, heavenly vs. hellish.
In Sacred Scripture God gives us several distinct layers
of meanings and definitions. Our first encounter with Divine Speech through
Sacred Scripture is the literal sense of the sentences that make up the books
of Sacred Scripture. These sentences can be read by anyone and be understood
in the literal sense. What are the topics of Sacred Scripture at this literal
level of meaning? What is God talking to us about?
At the literal level Sacred Scripture has a historical
and religious content. For instance, the Old Testament Sacred Scripture reads
like the history of an ancient people, and contains poetry about God, visions
and dreams by prophets, various prophecies of future history, numerous
commandments and rituals that must be performed, and punishments and rewards
are received accordingly. This literal-historical level of meaning of Sacred
Scripture forms the basis for religion and its various denominations and
varieties.
What happens when people form religions and belief
systems based on the literal sense of Sacred Scripture? People interpret this
literal content to suit themselves and what they love. People focus on the
parts they like and ignore the parts of Sacred Scripture they don’t like.
There is no consistency, no rational responsibility for being consistent. It
is necessary therefore for people to go to the next layer of meaning in Sacred
Scripture. This is called the spiritual meaning or the interior meaning,
whereas the literal sense is called the natural meaning or the external
meaning.
People are able to penetrate to the hidden correspondential sense of Sacred Scripture by making these steps:
(1) Acknowledging that the correspondential sense of Sacred
Scripture can only be understood by being received from God. No one can do
this on their own or from their own. Those who try come up with much
improvable fantasy rather than truth and reality.
(2) Studying Sacred Scripture by rational and scientific
methods. One must be completely consistent, explain apparent contradictions,
and ignore no parts. This is called forming for oneself the Doctrine of Truth
from Sacred Scripture. Theistic psychology is an instance of this approach.
(3) Applying each truth and idea to our daily willing and
thinking. We must monitor the hundreds of choices we make every day. Every
choice must be distinguished in our mind as either heavenly or hellish, as
defined by the spiritual meaning of Sacred Scripture that God reveals to us on
a daily basis.
If we practice these three steps on a daily basis, we are
slowly building up our heaven and cutting our ties with hell. After
resuscitation we happily and easily let go of whatever hellish traits remain,
and we enter our heaven.
The correspondential sense of the Old and New Testament Sacred
Scriptures are revealed in the Writings of Swedenborg Sacred Scripture. The
Writings Sacred Scripture teach us how to extract the correspondential sense of all
Sacred Scripture. The literal sense of the Writings Sacred Scripture are the
Swedenborg Reports in about 30 volumes that describe his experiments,
observations, and rationale. It is revealed there that life in eternal heaven
is a conjugial life, that is, everyone there is married. Swedenborg
interviewed many married couples who live in their heavens. A husband and wife
are soul mates and live out their immortal life in happiness and blessedness
in company with other similar couples with who they form a society or city.
Swedenborg describes the details of life in heaven and hell.
Why risk going to hell? Take charge of your immortality.
Start studying theistic psychology and read the Writings Sacred Scripture.
Gain knowledge of how to be successful in your character reformation and
personality makeover. Everything depends on it!
1.0.5.5.5
The Hidden correspondential sense of Sacred Scripture
What is God talking to us about in the hidden correspondential sense of Sacred Scripture? And why is it hidden?
The idea of “God talking” is the same as the idea of
“Divine Truth” because God thinks and speaks Divine Truth and nothing else.
Remember that the mental world of eternity is the world created by God’s
thoughts and purposes. God has no beginning and no end, and therefore God’s
thoughts are eternal, which is the same as saying that God’s thoughts, or
Divine Truth, forms the world of eternity. Remember also that the physical
world of time and space is an effect or consequence of a mental cause. This
mental cause of the physical world is Divine Truth, which is God’s thinking.
We at first think that the physical world is concrete and
solid while the mental world is ephemeral, almost non-existent in concrete
reality. We have sayings in popular culture like “It’s only in his
imagination. It’s not real.” A popular song about an island the singer is
dreaming of ends with “But there is no island at all, Just a picture on my
wall.” So we grow up with the idea that the mental world is less real than the
physical world.
But as we progress in our rational thinking we discover
from the hidden correspondential sense of Sacred Scripture that the mental world is
more real than the physical world. Everything in the physical world is
temporary and breaks down with time. Nothing is permanent. But in the mental
world created by God’s thoughts every single thing is permanent. We are
immortal because our mental world is created by the thoughts of God, that is,
by Divine Truth. A human mind constructed out of God’s thoughts and feelings
is an immortal being because nothing in it can die, everything in it is
permanent in eternity. Animals do not have the same mental body we have.
While we have a natural mind and a spiritual mind,
animals only have a natural mind. Upon the death of the animal the mental body
containing the animal’s natural mind cannot remain itself, cannot survive, and
dissipates. It is our spiritual mind that makes us different from all animals.
Our spiritual mind is constructed as a receptor organ for God’s thoughts and
feelings, while animals do not have such an organ. The natural mind animals
have are similar to our natural mind in that its content is constructed
through the sensory signals of the physical body. In contrast to this, the
spiritual mind does not receive any input whatsoever from the physical body
and the natural world. All the input into our spiritual mind comes from the
spiritual world, that is, the mental world of eternity.
The input or inflow of God’s thoughts and feelings into
our spiritual mind is unconscious and automatic. This is the source of
rationality, that is, our ability to think and reason rationally in our
natural mind. We are not conscious of the inflow of God’s rational thoughts.
We are only conscious of the rational thoughts as we are thinking about
something or solving a problem.
Why then are we not perfectly rational all the time? Why
is the Divine Truth hidden in Sacred Scripture as its correspondential sense? Why not
reveal the truth to everybody?
To understand the answer you need to recall that God’s
thoughts and feelings flow out into the created mental world of eternity where
the minds of human beings exist and live. God’s thoughts and feelings spread
out into the mental world of humanity like sunlight and heat spread out into
physical space and into the planets. Divine Truth as Divine Speech, spreads
into the unconscious spiritual mind of every human being, insuring the
rationality and immortality of every member of the human race. But where does
Divine Truth go from there? How does it go from the unconscious spiritual mind
to the conscious natural mind where we do our thinking
The answer is that the natural mind and the spiritual
mind are connected by the laws of correspondences. These laws govern the
functional connection between the layers of reality, starting with the
spiritual mind and its layers, spreading outward to the natural mind, and
finally being written down as sentences in a book. At each level of descent
there is a corresponding reaction so that the upper level causes the lower
level to react in correspondence with itself. When Divine Speech, or Divine
Truth, reaches the bottom of the natural mind, the meaning of the ideas are
natural, not spiritual. The literal sense that the prophet writes down in
sentences is not what God said or thought, but a correspondence to what God
thought and said. See the
Layers Diagram.
For instance the literal sense of the Old Testament
Sacred Scripture often speaks of water, different forms of it, like rain,
ocean, storm, flood, river, spring waters, etc. When Swedenborg read the
Sacred Scripture people use in the heavens of their eternity, there was no
mention of water anywhere. Instead, when Swedenborg compared the specific
passages and phrases where the Old Testament Sacred Scripture mentions water,
there was mention of various forms of truth, like external vs. internal truth,
or mediate truth vs. genuine truth, or truth of doctrine, truth of religion,
natural truth vs. spiritual truth, falsified truth, etc. In other words,
Divine Speech discusses the varieties of truth in human minds, not the weather
or bodies of water on earth.
Another example is the frequent mention and description
of wars conducted by the children of Israel in the Holy Land. All sorts of
sordid details are given, some quite revolting. In several passages God is
quoted as saying that He orders the children of Israel to invade the land that
was promised them, wage holy war against the inhabitants, and destroy their
cities, and decimate their population. God orders that no one should be spared
the sword, -- women, children, and cattle. Many people today are puzzled or
offended by such a barbaric treatment commanded by God. But you can understand
it if you look for the hidden spiritual meaning of these events. Every detail
of war mentioned in the Old Testament Sacred Scripture can be analyzed and
seen to deal with the details of the psychology of regeneration.
Swedenborg was conscious in both the natural
mind, as we are now, and in his spiritual mind, as we will be after
resuscitation, which is the process of awakening in the spiritual mind a few
hours after the death of the physical body (see Section xx). Because
Swedenborg was conscious in both minds simultaneously he was in a position of
making direct empirical observations of how natural and spiritual phenomena
are interrelated. He was able to read the literal meaning of the Bible in
Hebrew and Greek so that he was conscious of its meaning in the natural mind,
as we are, but also of its meaning in the spiritual mind, since the two are
interrelated. This is how he empirically discovered the natural-spiritual
correspondences in the Bible. Let's see what he discovered about the Genesis
creation story as he compared passages in the Bible with Sacred Scripture that
exists in every person's unconscious spiritual mind. In the following passages
people are called "angels" when, after death and resuscitation, they become
conscious in their spiritual and celestial layers of the mind. The expression
"the Word" refers to Sacred Scripture. "The Lord" refers to the universal God
the Divine Human (see Section xx). The expression "the Word in the world"
refers to the literal meaning of Sacred Scripture as we are conscious of it in
our natural mind, which is referred to as "the church."
Quoting from the Writings of Swedenborg: [comments
in italics are not in the original]
De Verbo 14. XIV The Word in the
heavens.
The Word [= Sacred Scripture] exists in all the heavens [= layers
of the mind], and it is read there as it is in the world [= the
meaning of it in our natural mind] , and sermons [= knowledge of
theistic psychology] are based on it.
For it [= Sacred Scripture] is the
Divine Truth which is the source of the angels' [= people in the
afterlife already conscious in their celestial layers] intelligence and
wisdom. For without the Word no one knows anything about the Lord [= God
the Divine Human], love and faith, redemption, and all the other secrets
of heavenly wisdom. In fact without the Word heaven [= consciousness in
the afterlife in our celestial layers] would not exist, just as without
the Word there would be no church in the world [= no way of regenerating
our character], so that there would be no linking with the Lord.
(...)
[2] The Word in the Lord's spiritual kingdom [= unconscious spiritual
layer of our mind] is not the same as the Word in the world [=
conscious natural layer of our mind]. In the world there is the natural
Word, but in that kingdom there is a spiritual Word. The difference is like
that between its natural and spiritual senses.
The nature of the spiritual sense [=
correspondential sense] has been demonstrated at length in my Arcana
Coelestia, where the whole contents of Genesis and Exodus have been
explained in accordance with that sense. The difference is such that no
word is the same. Things take the place of names, and likewise of
numbers; the histories are replaced by matters concerning the church [=
the natural mind]. The surprising thing is that, when an angel reads it,
he is unaware that it is not the same as what he read in the Word while in
the world [= after resuscitation, we become conscious in the spiritual
mind and unconscious in the natural mind]. This is because he no longer
has any natural ideas, since they are replaced with spiritual ones; and
the natural and the spiritual are linked by correspondences into a kind of
unity.
So when someone passes from the natural
into the spiritual [= at our death and immediate resuscitation], it
seems to him as if they were the same. In fact an angel does not know that
he is wiser than he was in the world, though his wisdom is really so
superior as to be comparatively indescribable. He is unable to recognize the
difference, because in his spiritual state he knows nothing of the natural
state, which he had in the world; and he is unable to compare and
differentiate them [= as Swedenborg was able to do], because he
cannot return to his former state so as to make a comparison [= but
Swedenborg was conscious in both before his death]. Still an angel in
heaven is constantly being brought to a higher degree of perfection in
wisdom than he had in the world, because his affection for spiritual truth
is purer [= more rational and perfect].
[3] However, the Word in the Lord's celestial kingdom is far superior and
wiser than the Word in His spiritual kingdom. The difference is of the same
kind as that which distinguishes the natural Word in the world from the
spiritual Word, as has been stated.
For that Word contains an inmost sense,
called celestial, which in all its details refers to nothing but the Lord [=
how God the Divine Human manages our mental operations]. In this Word
[= celestial layer of our mind] the Lord [= God the Divine Human
] is read in place of "Jehovah" [= God's literal Name in the Bible],
and of "Abraham", "Isaac" and "Jacob"; and also the Lord is named in place
of "David", "Moses," "Elijah" and the rest of the Prophets; and His divinity
is distinguished by special marks [= in the written version of Sacred
Scripture that exists in our celestial mind]. The names of the twelve
tribes of Israel, and also the names of the Apostles, when read there,
convey something about the Lord as regards the church [= how we can
change our inherited character]; and so with all the rest.
From this it became plain to me that the
whole of the Sacred Scripture deals in its inmost sense with nothing but the
Lord. The difference which distinguishes the two Words, the spiritual and
the celestial, is like that between thoughts, the province of the intellect
[= our cognitive organ], and affections, the province of the will [=
our affective organ]. For the angels of the celestial kingdom are guided
[= our chief motives and loves] by love to the Lord and so
affection for good [= wanting to be conjoined with God the Divine Human
]; the angels of the spiritual kingdom are guided by faith in the Lord
and so by perception of truth [= wanting to be conjoined with the truths
of God the Divine Human].
[4] Another difference between the celestial and spiritual Words is their
script. The script of the spiritual Word is made up of letters resembling
the printed letters of our world; but each letter has a meaning. If
therefore you were to see that script, you would not understand a single
word. For one letter succeeds another without a break, with dashes and dots
above and below, since it is in accordance with spiritual speech, which has
nothing in common with natural speech. The wiser angels are, the more they
see of the inner secrets of their Word so written, more so than the simpler
angels. What is stored there is plainly visible to the eyes of the wise, but
not to the eyes of the simple. It is similar to what happens with our Word,
but to a greater degree; here too the wise see more than the simple.
The script of the celestial Word, however,
is made up of letters not known in the world. They are indeed alphabetical,
but each one of them is composed of curved lines with serifs above and
below, and there are small marks or dots in the letters, and also above and
below them. I was told that the most ancient people on this earth had such a
script. Some details agree with the Hebrew script, but not much. Such a
script expresses the affections which make up a love; so it contains more
secrets than they themselves can ever utter. They express these unutterable
secrets which they perceive from their Word by means of representations. The
wisdom hidden away in this Word surpasses the wisdom in the spiritual Word
as a thousand does one.
[5] To make the difference between the three Words, the natural, the
spiritual and the celestial, intelligible, let us take as an example the
first chapters of Genesis, which deal with Adam, his wife and the Garden.
In the natural Word which we have in
this world there is a description of the creation of the world, the first
creation of man, and the earthly pleasures and delights of man and the
world. By the persons named following him up to the Flood [= hellish
traits we inherit and acquire ] are meant his descendants, and the
numbers mean their ages. But in the spiritual Word the angels of the
spiritual kingdom have, this is not what is meant. The first chapter is a
description of the reform and regeneration of the people of the most ancient
church [= celestial traits we inherit and acquire]; this too is
called a new creation. The second chapter describes as the Garden the
intelligence of the people of that church; Adam and his wife stand for the
church itself, and their descendants down to the Flood describe the changes
in the state of that church [= evolution of mental states in the human
race], up to the time when it came to an end and was finally destroyed
[= ] by the Flood [= hellish traits we inherit and acquire].
But in the celestial Word possessed by the
angels of the Lord's celestial kingdom, the first chapter describes the
glorification of the Lord's Human; the Garden describes his Divine wisdom.
Adam himself is understood to mean the Lord as regards the Divine itself and
at the same time the Divine Human. His wife stands for the church, which
since it has life from the Lord is called Eve from [the Hebrew word for]
life. Adam says of her that she was to be his bone and his flesh, and [they
should be] one flesh, because the church comes from the Lord, and is out of
Him and with Him as if one. The names of the descendants of Adam describe
the successive states by which the Lord was received by the people of that
church and linked with them, until there was nothing at all received and so
no linking.
[6] So when the first chapters in our Word
are read by upright people, especially by boys and girls, and they feel joy
at the state when everything was created and at the Garden, then these
meanings are unfolded, and the spiritual angels [= those in the afterlife
connected to the natural mind of people still on earth] understand them
in accordance with their Word, and the celestial angels in accordance with
theirs, without being aware that a person or a child is reading it [=
hence without prior knowledge or biased teaching]. These meanings are
unfolded in their due sequence because they correspond, and correspondences
are from creation like this.
This makes it plain what the Word is like
in its depths, that is, it has three senses. The last is the natural
one for men on earth; this deals mainly with worldly matters [=
historical narratives] and where it deals with Divine matters [=
spiritual meanings about the afterlife], they are still described by
the kind of things which the world contains [= spiritual ideas
described and understood naturally, not spiritually]. The middle
sense is the spiritual one, which describes the kind of things which belong
to the church [= mental world of eternity in the afterlife]. The
inmost sense is the celestial one, which contains the kind of things which
belong to the Lord [= how we are conjoined to God by loving Him].
For the whole of nature is a theatre
representing the Lord's kingdom; and the Lord's kingdom, heaven and the
church, is a theatre representing the Lord Himself. For just as the Lord
glorified His Human [during the Incarnation Event], so too He
regenerates a person; and as He regenerates a person, so too did He create
him.
[7] These facts may establish what the Word is like in its depths. The
natural Word as possessed by the Christian part of the world contains within
itself a spiritual and a celestial Word. For the spiritual sense of our Word
is the Word in the heavens which make up the Lord's spiritual kingdom; and
the celestial sense of our Word, its inmost sense, is the Word in the
heavens which make up the Lord's celestial kingdom. Our Word therefore
contains both the spiritual and the celestial Words; but the spiritual Word
and the celestial Word do not contain the natural Word. The Word of our
world is therefore the one most full of Divine wisdom, and consequently more
holy than the Word of the heavens [= because it contains the other two
Sacred Scripture within itself]. (DE VERBO 14)
AC 4. While the mind cleaves to the
literal sense alone [= of Sacred Scripture], no one can possibly see
that such things [= heavenly secrets in the form of correspondences]
are contained [= hidden] within it. Thus in these first chapters of
Genesis [= Chapters 1 to 11], nothing is discoverable from the sense
of the letter other than that the creation of the world is treated of, and
the garden of Eden which is called Paradise, and Adam as the first created
man. Who supposes anything else? But it will be sufficiently established in
the following pages that these matters contain arcana [= secrets]
which have never yet been revealed; and in fact that the first chapter of
Genesis in the internal sense treats in general of the new creation of man,
or of his regeneration [= mental character change from inherited hellish
traits to heavenly], and specifically of the Most Ancient Church; and
this in such a manner that there is not the least expression which does not
represent, signify, and enfold within it these things. (AC 4)
AC 67. CHAPTER 2 As of the Lord's
Divine mercy it has been given me to know the internal meaning of the Word,
in which are contained deepest arcana that have not before come to anyone's
knowledge, nor can come unless the nature of the other life is known (for
very many things of the Word's internal sense have regard to, describe, and
involve those of that life), I am permitted to disclose what I have heard
and seen during some years in which it has been granted me to be in the
company of spirits and angels. (AC 67)
AC 68. I am well aware that many will say
that no one can possibly speak with spirits and angels so long as he lives
in the body; and many will say that it is all fancy, others that I relate
such things in order to gain credence, and others will make other
objections. But by all this I am not deterred, for I have seen, I have
heard, I have felt. (AC 68)
AC 69. Man was so created by the Lord as
to be able while living in the body to speak with spirits and angels, as in
fact was done in the most ancient times; for, being a spirit clothed with a
body, he is one with them. But because in process of time men so immersed
themselves in corporeal and worldly things as to care almost nothing for
aught besides, the way was closed. Yet as soon as the corporeal things
recede in which man is immersed, the way is again opened, and he is among
spirits, and in a common life with them. (AC 69)
AC 70. As it is permitted me to disclose
what for several years I have heard and seen, it shall here be told, first,
how the case is with man when he is being resuscitated; or how he enters
from the life of the body into the life of eternity. In order that I might
know that men live after death, it has been given me to speak and be in
company with many who were known to me during their life in the body; and
this not merely for a day or a week, but for months, and almost a year,
speaking and associating with them just as in this world. They wondered
exceedingly that while they lived in the body they were, and that very many
others are, in such incredulity as to believe that they will not live after
death; when in fact scarcely a day intervenes after the death of the body
before they are in the other life; for death is a continuation of life. (AC
70)
See the
Layers Diagram.
Here is a summary of the correspondential
sense of the first chapters of Genesis:
From: BibleMeanings.info (paraphrased from
the Writings of Swedenborg):
http://www.biblemeanings.info/Bible/genesis.html
AC 6. The six days, or periods, which are so
many successive states of the regeneration of man, are in general as
follows.
AC 7. The first state is that which precedes,
including both the state from infancy, and that immediately before
regeneration. This is called a "void," "emptiness," and "thick darkness."
And the first motion, which is the Lord‘s mercy, is "the Spirit of God
moving upon the faces of the waters."
AC 8. The second state is when a distinction is
made between those things which are of the Lord, and those which are proper
to man. The things which are of the Lord are called in the Word "remains,"
and here are especially knowledges of faith, which have been learned from
infancy, and which are stored up, and are not manifested until the man comes
into this state. At the present day this state seldom exists without
temptation, misfortune, or sorrow, by which the things of the body and the
world, that is, such as are proper to man, are brought into quiescence, and
as it were die. Thus the things which belong to the external man are
separated from those which belong to the internal man. In the internal man
are the remains, stored up by the Lord unto this time, and for this use.
AC 9. The third state is that of repentance, in
which the man, from his internal man, speaks piously and devoutly, and
brings forth goods, like works of charity, but which nevertheless are
inanimate, because he thinks they are from himself. These goods are called
the "tender grass," and also the "herb yielding seed," and afterwards the
"tree bearing fruit."
AC 10. The fourth state is when the man becomes
affected with love, and illuminated by faith. He indeed previously
discoursed piously, and brought forth goods, but he did so in consequence of
the temptation and straitness under which he labored, and not from faith and
charity; wherefore faith and charity are now enkindled in his internal man,
and are called two "luminaries."
AC 11. The fifth state is when the man
discourses from faith, and thereby confirms himself in truth and good: the
things then produced by him are animate, and are called the "fish of the
sea," and the "birds of the heavens."
AC 12. The sixth state is when, from faith, and
thence from love, he speaks what is true, and does what is good: the things
which he then brings forth are called the "living soul" and the "beast." And
as he then begins to act at once and together from both faith and love, he
becomes a spiritual man, who is called an "image." His spiritual life is
delighted and sustained by such things as belong to the knowledges of faith,
and to works of charity, which are called his "food and his natural life is
delighted and sustained by those which belong to the body and the senses;
whence a combat arises, until love gains the dominion, and he becomes a
celestial man.
AC 13. Those who are being regenerated do not
all arrive at this state. The greatest part, at this day, attain only the
first state some only the second; others the third, fourth, or fifth; few
the sixth; and scarcely any one the seventh.
Continued here:
http://www.biblemeanings.info/Bible/genesis.html
Let us examine a Number from the Writings Sacred
Scripture that will demonstrate to you how the scientific sense is extracted
from the literal meaning of Sacred Scripture. This passage gives an analysis
of a phrase in the Old Testament Sacred Scripture. Try to keep track of the
topic by translating certain words from the literal meaning into theistic
psychology concepts. See if you can memorize these correspondences:
THE WRITINGS
SACRED SCRIPTURE |
CORRESPONDING THEISTIC PSYCHOLOGY
CONCEPTS |
| the Word |
Sacred Scripture |
| the Lord |
God the Divine Human |
| church |
our understanding of truth from Sacred Scripture |
| labor, combat, works |
fighting against spiritual temptations |
| rest on the seventh day, peace |
not being in a state of temptation, conjunction with God the Divine
Human |
| external man, internal man |
conscious natural mind, unconscious spiritual mind |
| Divine order, heaven rules man |
our daily thinking and willing conforms to the truth from Sacred
Scripture that is in our understanding |
| born into loving the world and himself more than heaven
and the Lord |
inherited hellish traits in the natural mind, materialism, selfism,
negative bias in science |
| regenerating, regenerated, external things disposed so as
to agree with internal things |
character reformation to conform to truth from Sacred Scripture in our
understanding |
| the hells flow from all sides, continually endeavoring to
infest |
particular connection to vertical community through our love for
inherited enjoyments and attachments |
| the Lord continually protects and sets him free. |
the Divine Psychologist manages the process of character reformation
to the extent we reciprocate |
| the body and its senses, see and act through influx from
heaven |
sensations are not caused by the electro-chemical action of neurons,
but the reverse |
| raised from external things into internal, and thus into
the light of heaven. |
becoming conscious in the rational mind when is in correspondence with
the spiritual mind |
| in this world are intelligent and wise, those who are in
the truth and good of the church |
when we make our daily willing and thinking to conform to the truths
of Sacred Scripture in our understanding, we receive intelligence in
greater degree |
| [scientists who] confirmed themselves against the truths
and goods of the church, are more insane and foolish that the rest |
materialistic monism or the negative bias in science, which denies God
and the truths of Sacred Scripture, thus denies spiritual reality, which
is irrational, thus is in the hells of the mind |
| after death they are raised by the Lord into angelic
wisdom |
those who make their daily willing and thinking to conform to the
truths of Sacred Scripture, are resuscitated in their mental body and
choose to dwell in their conjugial heaven, where where they think and feel
in terms of celestial-rational correspondences of Divine Speech |
Quoting from the Writings Sacred Scripture: (words in
italics appear in the table above)
AC 9278. Six days thou shalt do thy works.
[Exodus. 23:12]
That this signifies the state of labor and of combat
when the man is in external delights that are to be conjoined with internal,
is evident from the signification of the "six days" which precede the
seventh, as being a state of labor and of combat (see n. 737, 900, 8510,
8888, 8975). The labor and combat then are signified by the "works"
which they were to do in the six days. By the "works of the six days," and
the "rest on the seventh day," are signified those things which come
forth in man in his first, and in his second state, during regeneration,
and also those which come forth in him when he has been regenerated.
(Concerning the first and second states of man during regeneration, see
above, n. 9274; and concerning those things which come forth with him when
he has been regenerated, n. 9213.)
These things take place to the end that external things
may be conjoined with internal; for there is an external man, which is also
called natural; and there is an internal man, which is also called
spiritual. The external man communicates with the world, and the internal
man with heaven.
[2] The Divine order is that heaven should rule the
world in man, and not the world rule heaven in him; for when heaven
rules man, then the Lord rules him. Man is born into loving the world and
himself more than heaven and the Lord. And because this is opposite to
Divine order, there must be an inversion by means of regeneration; and this
inversion is effected when the things of heaven and the Lord are loved more
than those of the world and of self. This is the reason why the man who has
been regenerated, as also he who is in heaven, is alternately in external
and in internal things; for external things are thereby disposed so as to
agree with internal things; and finally to be subject to them.
[3] When a man is in external things, he is in labor
and combat, for he is then in a life which savors of the world, into which
the hells flow from all sides, continually endeavoring to infest, and
even to subjugate in the man the things of heaven; but the Lord
continually protects and sets him free.
From this arise the labor and combat which are
signified by the "six days of the week in which works are to be done." But
when the man is in internal things, then, because he is in heaven with the
Lord, the labor and combat cease, and he is in the tranquility of peace, in
which tranquility conjunction also is effected. These are the things which
are signified by the "seventh day." That the interiors of man have been
created according to the image of heaven, and his exteriors according to the
image of the world; thus that man is a heaven and a world in a little form,
and according to the maxim of the ancients, is a microcosm, may be seen
above (n. 6057); and consequently that it is according to Divine order that
the Lord through heaven directs the world in man, and by no means the
reverse.
[4] The nature of the labor and combat when a man is in
external things, can be seen from the fact that he is then in such a state
as to be in heat from the world and to be cold toward heaven, unless heaven
be to him as the world; and that he is consequently in such a shade that he
cannot conceive otherwise than that external things flow into internal, and
consequently that the eye sees and the ear hears of itself, and that their
objects bring forth thoughts, and produce the intellect, and that thereupon
he is able of himself to believe, and likewise to love God; consequently
from the world to see heaven.
From this fallacy he can scarcely be withdrawn until he
has been raised from external things into internal, and thus into the
light of heaven. Then for the first time he perceives that the things in
him which are of the world, thus which are of the body and its senses,
see and act through influx from heaven, that is, through heaven from the
Lord, and not at all from themselves. From this it is evident why a sensuous
man believes that everything of his life is from the world and from nature;
that there is no hell, nor heaven; and finally that there is no God;
consequently why he ridicules everything of the church insofar as he is
concerned; but is in favor of it insofar as it concerns the simple, so that
they may be in bonds, in addition to those of the laws.
[5] From this it can be known what it is to be in
external things, and not at the same time in internal things, and that when
a man is in external things, he is in cold and shade in respect to the
things which are of heaven and which are of the Lord. From this also it can
be known who in this world are intelligent and wise, namely, those who
are in the truth and good of the church, because these are wise from
heaven; and also who are foolish and insane, namely, those who are not in
the good and truth of the church, because their knowledge is derived solely
from the world; and that those among them who by means of the sciences of
the world have confirmed themselves against the truths and goods of the
church, are more insane and foolish that the rest, however much
they may believe themselves intelligent and wise in comparison with others,
and may call those simple who are in the good of life from the truths of
doctrine; when yet the simplicity of these latter is wisdom in the eyes of
the angels, and moreover after death they are raised by the Lord into
angelic wisdom. (AC 9278)
You can see from the above that the hidden meaning of the
verse "Six days thou shalt do thy works" in the Old Testament Sacred
Scripture refers to the process of regeneration by which the natural
mind is made to correspond to the rational mind by compelling our thinking and
willing to conform to the truths of Sacred Scripture in our
understanding. This self-compulsion on a daily and hourly basis is referred to
as "six days of doing one's works." In God's purpose our main task on earth is
to regenerate, hence the methods of regeneration is a major topic of Divine
Speech hidden throughout Sacred Scripture.
For other demonstrations of extracting the hidden meaning
of Sacred Scripture using correspondences, see Sections:
among others -- see also
the
Index Volume 18 for additional
illustrations.
See also: BibleMeanings.info at
http://www.biblemeanings.info/index.htm
1.0.5.5.6
Why We Need Theistic Psychology
This is what God wants us to know. Divine Love wants each
human being to live in the heaven of eternity that is constructed out of God’s
rational
feelings and thoughts. God has arranged things so that He cannot make us to be
in our heaven if we don’t want to. This is called spiritual freedom. God puts
spiritual freedom above all other properties of human beings. Through His
Divine omnipotence God maintains the spiritual freedom of every human being
from birth to endless eternity. God makes sure that we remain totally unaware of
the fact that our thoughts and feelings are nothing but reactions or adaptations in our
mind to His thoughts and feelings in the form of the spiritual substances of
good and truth inflowing from Him (see Section xx). His thoughts and feelings
are not our thoughts and feelings! But our reactions to the
substances of good and truth inflowing into our mental organs, are our
thoughts and feelings. Our thoughts and feelings are never God's thoughts and
feelings, and vice versa, but they are related to each other by correspondence
(see Section xx).
God does not want us to actually sense or be sensuously aware of the
fact that our thoughts and feelings are mere reactions and adaptations to His
thoughts and feelings inflowing as good and truth substances. Why not?
Because we would not like it, and could not be happy in
heaven. In order for us to feel
happy it is a necessity that we feel like an independent self or person, and that we
act from our free will according to our own desires and understanding. We don’t want our
thoughts and feelings to be controlled by God. And so because God has made us
this way, He makes sure that we are unconscious of the source of our thinking
and feeling as being from God rather than from self.
God gives us the sense and feeling that we think and feel
from ourselves. This is called the as-of self (see Section xx). In other words, we do not have
a self that originates in ourselves. The collection of thoughts and feelings
we call a human person is not built up by ourselves, but by God’s actions in
our mind, and to which each of us reacts in a unique fashion. Every human being is born from parents so that the mental world of
the offspring is an actual offshoot to the mental world of the parents. This
has been true since the beginning of the race so that everyone lives in the
same inherited mental world of humanity. Our mental body
contains all the qualities of our parents, and they inherited their mental
qualities from their parents. Various specific genealogies thus evolve as
races, blood lines, families, and nations, each sub-variety of culture being a
particular zone in the mental world. The inheritance of the visible
physical traits are correspondences to the inheritance of the mental traits.
Over the many generations of human beings on this planet
there occurred a progressive decline in mental traits because people falsified
the thoughts of truth that came into their conscious natural mind from their
spiritual mind. The
original generations lived in a paradise on earth because this corresponded to
their mental states, which were heavenly (see Section xx). They were in direct communication
with conscious awareness, of their family and friends already in the afterlife
of eternity. This was through their spiritual mind, which in those days was
still conscious. But later generations began to falsify the thoughts of truth
in their natural mind. Falsified truths serve to justify feelings and
intentions that are contrary to good. In this way they created a hell in the
mental world and became unconscious of their spiritual mind while on earth.
Hell in the thoughts and feelings of our natural mind is nothing but the perversion of
the thoughts and feelings in our spiritual mind or heaven, because
evil, which is hell, is nothing but the corruption or adulteration of good,
which is heaven.
The hells of the human mind then kept growing and
accumulating from generation to generation. The New Testament Sacred Scripture
reveals that every human being born on this earth had become a hell by the
time of the Incarnation Event two thousand years ago, by which God made Himself be born as a human
child on earth. By acquiring a Divine Natural Body, God radically changed His
relationship to the human race and our evolution of consciousness. The Divine
Child, while on earth, created in His natural mind a new mental organ that did
not exist before in the human race (see Section xx). This organ is called the
spiritual-natural mind. (see Section xx)
1.0.5.5.7
The New Evolution in Rational Consciousness of God
In other words, God created a new anatomical area in the human mind
that did not yet exist there. This new anatomical organ is called the spiritual-natural
mind. Note that it is both natural and spiritual. This is its new power.
Before this mental organ was created by the Divine Child in Himself two
thousand years ago, there was only a conscious natural mind and an unconscious
spiritual mind (see Section xx). But the reverse, after
resuscitation. Until our death we are conscious in our natural mind; after
death we are conscious in our spiritual mind. Swedenborg was conscious in both
minds, like the people of the earliest generations on earth (see Section xx).
The Divine Child created a new mental plane of operation
called spiritual-natural. This is now the conscious rational meeting place between God and the
individual still regenerating on earth. It is the intermediate zone, half in time, and half in
eternity. With the mental operation at this new spiritual-natural level of the mind, we are fully conscious
of God in our rational spirituality. We can see spiritual reality rationally.
Theistic psychology is the content of this new spiritual-natural organ,
containing our consciousness, knowledge, and awareness of eternity, of God, of
heaven and hell.
Theistic psychology is the knowledge extracted from the
correspondential sense of Sacred Scripture by following the exact steps prescribed
for the extraction process (see Section xx). The unveiling of this
new theistic science marks the beginning of the New Age that shall never end
or be succeeded by a another age.
Now at last the human race is complete in its creation. The creation of the
conscious spiritual-natural mind by the Divine Child in Himself, was the last act of
organic creation that completed
the human race. From then on every human being possesses this spiritual-natural
organ. With this organ the individual can enter heaven before death and live
out a life on earth as if in heaven, and after resuscitation, in actual
heaven. But our consciousness of this organ is proportional to our
regeneration efforts (see Section xx).
Rational spirituality is the daily life discipline of
dwelling consciously in the presence of God as we go about our daily
activities. The spiritual-natural organ is activated more and more as we live
the discipline of rational spirituality. The more this organ is activated the
more we are happy, effective, and loving human beings. We are enlightened. We can instantly
recognize genuine truth from distorted truth. We cannot be led away by others
or distracted by human foibles. We are most useful to others through our
understanding and compassion. We are angels on earth for a time.
The discipline of rational spirituality has these
components:
(1) Acknowledging God’s omnipotence and its implications
for how we think about events.
(2) Acknowledging God’s Divine Speech in the correspondential sense of Sacred Scripture. This is called theistic psychology.
(3) Studying theistic psychology on a daily basis in the
conscious presence of God. Being a student of it. Making notes, lists, tables,
charts, and diagrams. Considering this a Divine or sacred task. Developing and
cumulating the Doctrine of Truth from Sacred Scripture. Acknowledging that it is
God who puts this Doctrine in our understanding. Acknowledging this Doctrine
as Divine Truth in our mind, placed there by God, and maintained there by God.
(4) Self-witnessing our threefold self – (a) the
affective self of feelings, emotions, and intentions; (b) the cognitive self
of thoughts, plans, justifications; (c) the sensorimotor self of sensations
and motor determinations. Applying the Doctrine in our understanding.
Examining every thought or intention or enjoyment, asking ourselves: Is it
from heaven or from hell. Applying the Doctrine of Truth to make this
decision. Doing this all day, every day.
(5) Acknowledging the Doctrine of the Wife (see Section
11.4). Swedenborg has confirmed that our immortality in heaven is in the married
state. No one enters the heaven in their mind except as a married couple.
There are no heavens for singles. This is because the portion of the human
mind called heaven in eternity consists of a conjoint self. This means that
the mental body of the husband and wife are joined together and function as
one unit. The husband’s respiratory system or thinking is joined to the wife’s
circulatory system or willing (see Section xx).
The conjoint mental body is made up on the outside, of
the wife’s affective organ united to the husband’s cognitive organ, and on the
inside, it is made up of the wife’s cognitive organ united to the husband’s
affective organ. In order to achieve this conjoint self the husband must
practice the Doctrine of the Wife as a daily spiritual discipline (see Section
11.4). As he makes progress, he begins to see that the Doctrine of the Wife
and the Doctrine of Truth are the same.
Study
Questions: 1.0.1.3 to 1.0.5.4 1. Describe the psychobiology of "conjunction" with God? You need to include
the concept of how thoughts and feelings are substances. How do you see this
concept as applying to you?
2. Describe the infrastructure of physical things from the perspective of
substantive dualism. Show that the inmost of any object is the mental world of
humanity. How does this change the way you look at objects around you?
3. Explain why God hides from people. What would happen if God showed Himself
to your friends? Include the concept of of how Divine Speech descends through
the layers of meaning through the human mind, reaching its lowest as the literal
meaning of Sacred Scripture.
4. Describe how Divine Speech operates our mental life. How does this change
your view of God and His relationship to people?
5. Where is heaven and hell? Describe its anatomy. Why do they both exist in
everybody's mind?
6. Describe the two methods God uses to conjoin or communicate with people.
In what way have you experienced these two avenues of relationship with God?
7. Explain why this is a perfect world despite the appearances of
imperfection.
8. Why does spirituality, or relationship to God, have to be rational? What
happens with "sensuous spirituality" -- discuss what happens in the afterlife.
9. Explain the formula "mental world = spiritual world = afterlife =
eternity" and write it down. Read it and edit it until it makes sense. Now try
to explain the proof to a friend or two. How well did you succeed? What is your
conclusion or future plan?
1.0.6 The
Negative and Positive Bias in Science
"Theistic" psychology
contrasts with "non-theistic" psychology which prohibits the use of God as an
explanatory concept for any phenomenon or theory in psychology. By contrast,
theistic psychology makes use of knowledge about God from "scientific
revelations" which are found in Sacred Scripture (see Section xx).
We will examine the data and experiments Swedenborg presents in his reports
about the spiritual world of the afterlife.
Note that by examining this evidence presented by a prominent author
well known in Western literature--though not in science, you are not automatically granting that
it is authentic scientifically. You only need to grant -- right from the
beginning -- that it is possible
that Swedenborg's observations might be accurate, valid, and
scientific.
This is called maintaining the "positive bias in science," in contrast to maintaining a
"negative bias in science," which automatically excludes God and Swedenborg's reports about
his observations in heaven and hell.
Those who read Swedenborg's Writings while maintaining the
negative bias in science are not able to evaluate the objectivity and rationality of
Swedenborg's reports about the spiritual world, the afterlife, devils, and
angels. The entire collection of his reports are dismissed prior to seeing the
evidence he presents. Whatever evidence may be presented in these reports, if
read with the negative bias in science, will not be critically assessed because it was already
rejected in advance.
Those who want to examine
the objectivity and rationality of Swedenborg's reports must therefore do so by
maintaining the positive bias in science while
examining the evidence.
This means to grant in advance that it's possible that
there is a God and that scientific revelations are given by God to humankind,
and that Swedenborg was given the Divinely appointed task of scientific
revelator to humankind, which involved the ability of being simultaneously
conscious in this world and in the spiritual world.
Everyone has the ability of being conscious, first in this
world, and then in the afterlife of the spiritual world. But no one has this
conscious perception of both lives or worlds at the same time. Swedenborg at age
57 suddenly found himself to be conscious in the spiritual world while he was
going about his busy daily schedule as a Swedish mining engineer in the 18th
century (see Section xx). Though somewhat disoriented at first, he quickly
adapted to it and lived until age 84 in that dual consciousness state, being
able to write and publish some 30 volumes of notes giving his observations and experiments
in the spiritual world.
To examine whether this evidence is rational and
scientifically objective we must grant the possibility that his reports are
scientifically accurate and honest. This is the positive bias in science. It is no
different from the positive bias in science we must have when reading a textbook in any
science course. We assume that the data and experiments reported are not
fabricated by delusional scientists. If we maintained the negative bias in
science about
science books and reports we would be thinking that these are fake data by
dishonest people, and we could hardly evaluate them critically. It is normal
therefore to adopt the positive bias in science in advance of a critical examination of a
report. Keep in mind that Swedenborg had an impeccable reputation for honesty as
a science publisher and inventor. Almost all of his reports prior to age 57 have
been given high marks by biographers and science reviewers. But after age 57 all
his published reports were about the spiritual world.
During the 27 years of his dual existence he continued his
public life in Sweden, making important contributions in engineering, metallurgy,
and finance legislation, and he was never accused by anyone of fraud, deception, or
delusion. Swedenborg's reports are written in the rational style of science and
philosophy. He always maintains an overall coherence through systemic
integration of all his concepts into a rational account, never contradicting
what he has already established. Finally, in the past 200 years hundreds of
scientists, historians, theologians, philosophers, commentators, and translators
have read all of Swedenborg's reports and have praised them as inspired,
veridical, and rational to the highest degree. I myself have read them several
times and have found them to meet the appropriate standards of a scientific
work.
Given these considerations, it makes sense for you to adopt
the positive bias in science by granting the possibility that these scientific
revelations are indeed from God and that Swedenborg was the person through whose
mind these revelations were delivered to humanity. At the end of this
exploration you might decide that you prefer to reject the evidence or that the
evidence is insufficient. Or, you might decide that you want to embark upon
further study of Swedenborg's Writings.
Within this positive bias
in science mode, scientists and scholars can
look at the entirety of the Swedenborg reports -- about 30 volumes in English
translation. Theistic psychology is the attempt to organize the Swedenborg
reports into a coherent psychological approach that meets the essential
standards of behavioral methodology and empiricism. Anyone can now decide on
rational grounds whether the evidence in theistic psychology is not just
possibly true, but actually valid and accurate.
This is what remains to be examined. I have written this book
in multiple volumes to help scientists, scholars, and students examine the
Swedenborg evidence from the scientific point of view of modern behavioral psychology,
which I have taught for 40 years in psychology departments known nationally for
their high scientific standards. I have contributed to the
development of this field, in some modest way. The list of my publications can
be consulted here:
www.soc.hawaii.edu/leonj/leonj/leonpsy/leonpublish.html and here:
www.soc.hawaii.edu/leonj/leonj/leonpsy/leonarticles.html
(see also the
Readings).
Note: Students who use this work in my Seminar on Rational
Spirituality should be aware that there is no pressure or expectation for them to change
their
mind on anything relating to science, psychology, or God. There is only the usual expectation in academic
courses that
students show the ability and effort it takes to read critically and to evaluate rationally. Since the topic is "spirituality," and more
specifically "God and the spiritual world of the afterlife," the first
impression one may get is that this is a topic from religion rather than science.
When we think that, we are a
little shocked that this should be the topic in a research seminar for
undergraduate majors in psychology. You are welcome to examine
the reports of students who have used this book as lecture notes (see
Reading List Part 2). I found that the initial
impression of students is succeeded by more informed thinking which clarifies
for them
completely the difference between religion and theistic psychology.
The majority of students who have used this book have had a childhood in which religion was considered a required part of
family activities. Some have been Catholics, Protestants, Evangelicals,
Buddhists, and self-declared atheists with a passion to oppose the idea of God.
After getting through their first reactions, as you can read from their reports,
they were so intrigued that many of them started staying after class to continue
discussion of the fascinating evidence. It seemed to me that all students
benefited from this critical examination of theistic psychology, whether or not they
ultimately came to accept or reject the evidence. Even those who rejected it found it interesting and
impressive, though they chose to maintain their stand from the beginning, which
was that the evidence is not
sufficient to be considered a scientific proof.
Those who came with a firm idea of God from their religion
did not exhibit conflict or distaste to the idea that
God might be introduced into science. Some decided yes, some no. The students
who read at least half of the material assigned, gained the most and had the
least conflict with the subject matter. About one third of the students
expressed deep appreciation and great happiness for their new ability to think
of God scientifically without in any way threatening their strongly held
religious views.
There are two perspectives one can use while examining this
work--the negative bias in science and the positive bias in science. The negative bias perspective is
that the Swedenborg's reports are automatically disqualified as science because he
claims that his observations came from his ability to be conscious
simultaneously in both the natural world and the spiritual world of "eternity"
or the "afterlife." He claims to have interviewed people who lived in heaven and
hell and that God appointed him for this task. In their estimation, Swedenborg gets an automatic
disqualification as a scientist and psychologist. They take up the position that
there is no need to read his
reports in any detail or to evaluate their scientific validity. This is the negative bias
perspective.
The positive bias perspective is that it is possible that
non-theistic psychology is wrong and that there is a God who manages human minds,
which are born immortal and live forever.
This possibility has never been disproven by science, and in fact, it is not
possible for non-theistic science to disprove it. Hence we are stuck, initially, with a bias
no matter which way we choose. If we choose the negative bias in science, there is no
scientific reason to examine Swedenborg's Writings in detail. But if we choose the
positive bias in science, there is a scientific reason to critically examine the Writings
in detail, namely, to
see if they have scientific merit. I have examined them with the positive bias
in science
and have determined that they are scientifically valid. I will attempt to
present the evidence I found and to make sense of it from the perspective of the
science of psychology.
If the Writings of Swedenborg are scientifically valid
reports, then the psychology they present is a theistic psychology which
contrasts with the current non-theistic psychology. Theistic psychology is
therefore dualist and spiritual, while non-theistic psychology remains monist and
materialist.
Here is a view by two
contemporary scientific psychologists who are also trying to work with a
positive bias in science, though they are apparently not aware of theistic psychology, nor
of Swedenborg's Writings.
Selections from:
Scientific Psychology and Christian Theism
Harold D. Delaney and Timothy E. Goldsmith
www.leaderu.com/aip/docs/delaney-goldsmith.html
(...)
III. Preserving the Person
Fundamental Presuppositions
of Modern Psychology
The fundamental presupposition
of not only radical behaviorism but of modern psychology in general is that of
naturalism. Human behavior, like the phenomena of other natural sciences, is
to be explained by citing only natural causes. Contemporary psychology is
largely defined, to use the phrase of Daniel Robinson, by its taking "Method
as Metaphysic" (Robinson, 1995, p. 330ff.). By this Robinson means that
psychology's adoption of empiricism or the scientific method as an
epistemology has devolved into an endorsement of materialism as the nearly
universally accepted position on metaphysics or ontology. The casualties of
this perspective have been not only the elimination of ideas of the reality of
God or the soul from the field, but also the traditional perspective of
persons as agents. To quote Robinson again, "If 'scientific' psychologies of
various stripes have a common ground, it is that upon which rejections of
'autonomous man' have always been based" (1995, p. 362).
(...)
A particularly ironic
implication of the elevation of the model of science to the correct
metaphysical description of man is that it ends up undercutting the
trustworthiness of science itself. This point is well-developed by C. Stephen
Evans in his helpful study Preserving the person. The scientist tries to
persuade a community of peers of the plausibility of a theory by offering
reasons why such a theory should be accepted. In explaining why he supports a
particular hypothesis, the scientist does not provide mechanistic explanations
of his own behavior (Evans, 1982, p. 75), e.g. "this theory makes me feel
better" or "I want to discredit Prof. X so I am offering a theory which is
contrary to his theory". Indeed, any time we think that a person's beliefs can
be explained by nonrational causes, we are less likely to accept those beliefs
as trustworthy. For a scientist to accept that his own behavior in endorsing a
particular hypothesis is accounted for by his unconscious desires or his
biological state is tantamount to admitting that "his work is not scientific
in character, as it is not governed by rational criteria" (Evans, 1982, p. 79.
Nonetheless, the methodological
training of psychologists fosters this schizophrenic view of persons, with
those who are research participants being regarded as hopelessly governed by
their conditioning history and biological predispositions while those who are
experimenters are responsible agents who rationally arrive at conclusions,
free of the distracting influences of what Bacon termed idols. As Van Leeuwen
put it, there is "an implicit double standard at work in psychology: a
cognitive capacity on which the very doing of science depends is routinely
assumed to be present in psychologists themselves yet ignored or circumvented
in the persons they study" (1985, pp. 70-71). There are some, like Malcolm
Jeeves, who embrace this dichotomy as reflecting complementary truths about
human nature (Jeeves, 1984, pp. 18-21). Jeeves, in something of the same
fashion as the evolutionary psychologists (Daly & Wilson, 1988, p. 269), sees
the assumption of viewing oneself as controlling one's own destiny as
psychologically healthy but viewing others' behavior as largely determined by
factors beyond their control as promoting compassion (Jeeves, 1984, pp.
29-31). While this is perhaps compatible with a view that individuals possess
varying degrees of real freedom of choice, there is an inherent inconsistency
between a total, undirected determinism that applies to the rat-like subjects
in your experiments but viewing yourself as free and rational.
Essence of Personhood
(...)
Man's uniqueness from the rest
of creation lies in his being created in the image of God. As God's image
bearer he shares in a limited form many of the attributes of God. These
include his ability to love, to know, and to choose. He is a person. His is an
immortal and living soul. Man is a moral being. Man is a rational agent. Man's
life has a purpose and his experience of the world is meaningful.
At the same time, man is a
creature, and shares many attributes with the rest of the created order. Made
of the dust of the earth, he is a biological system and has certain needs that
are similar to those of other organisms.
Thus, the Biblical view of man
is mixed: created in the image of God and declared very good, yet his fallen
nature is such that "All have sinned and fall short of the glory of God"; an
immortal soul temporarily encased in a very mortal body; God-like and
animal-like; part divine, part dust; spiritual yet carnal.
Finally, the capacity to make
decisions, to choose between alternatives, and to make those choices poorly or
well is the essential basis of personal responsibility. One of the most
fundamental characteristics of people, the Law of Human Nature as C.S. Lewis
terms it (1952), is this inherent ability not only to perceive right and
wrong, but to choose to do either the right or wrong.
Routes to Resolution
(...)
How can this conflict between
the person as traditionally understood by Christians and the image of the
human as a determined machine be resolved? The most helpful analysis of this
issue that we are aware of is that provided by the philosopher C. Stephen
Evans (1977). Evans notes that the apparent conflict between truths drawn from
science and truths drawn from Scripture arises because of scientism and the
"unity of science" thesis. By scientism is meant the view, due in large part
to Comte, that the truth that science gives is ultimate and complete. By the
unity of science thesis is meant that there is a single method that all true
sciences employ and that consists of searching for naturalistic, deterministic
causal explanations of phenomena.
Evans outlines three broad
categories of responses to, or routes to resolution of, this dilemma:
Reinterpreters, Limiters of Science, and Humanizers of Science. Reinterpreters
essentially capitulate, and accept the perspective of the sciences. That is,
they solve the problem by revising their view of the person. Arguments that
might be advanced for this alternative are that history should teach us,
witness the Galileo incident, that Christians are likely to be embarrassed
when they oppose the claims of science because of their supposed
incompatibility with Scripture. Proponents likely would also stress the
sovereignty of God, arguing that the Bible reveals a God who controls and
determines all things. The deterministic laws of human behavior are thus to be
regarded merely as "the means whereby God's sovereign decrees are
accomplished" (Evans, 1977, p. 96). Or in the King James style language of the
Westminster Confession, "although in relation to the foreknowledge and decree
of God, the first cause, all things come to pass immutably and infallibly, yet
by the same providence he ordereth them to fall out, according to the nature
of second causes, either necessarily, freely, or contingently". Thus the will
of man is regarded as one of the secondary causes by which God accomplishes
his purposes, though nonetheless human choices are not "by any absolute
necessity of nature determined to good or evil" (Leith, 1973, p. 200 and 205
as quoted in Evans, 1977, p. 99). Even so, Evans argues that Calvinists cannot
comfortably be Reinterpreters as he defines the position because the claim of
science to be the whole story cannot be true because, although it may give us
an account of how God accomplishes his purposes it does not give us the why, a
portion of which it revealed in the book of God's word not the book of God's
works.
Thus, a more palatable means of
resolving the problem is the Limiter of Science position. This involves at
least a partial rejection of the scientistic claim that science provides the
ultimate truth about the whole of reality. The most typical form of this
response is that science is a limited albeit valid perspective on humanity.
Thus, the perspectivalist Limiter of Science would argue that the psychologist
has no right to discount the knowledge of other, non-scientific approaches.
And, of course, it is just this sort of scientistic claim that psychologists
such as Skinner make, e.g. when he argues that "the traditional 'knowledge'"
of fields such as religion, philosophy, history, education, and family life
"must be corrected or displaced by a scientific analysis" (Skinner, 1971, p.
17). This is an error that perspectivalist and Christian neuroscientist Donald
Mackay has labelled "nothing buttery" (MacKay, 1979, p. 27). It is similar to
an electrician's claiming that a lighted sign is 'nothing but' a collection of
wires and electrical currents, and thus any consideration of what the words on
the sign mean is not only superfluous but invalid (Jeeves, 1976, p. 39).
What typically characterizes
perspectivalists such as MacKay, Jeeves and Myers is what is regarded by some
Christian psychologists as an "extremely high view of science" (Van Leeuwen,
1985, p. 66). That is, although they reject scientism they nonetheless endorse
the view that all sciences involve the objective pursuit of deterministic,
causal explanations. This in turn may be justified in part by noting that
devout Christians were at the forefront of the beginnings of modern science.
When the lens of science is turned on man it still is a valid means of
discovering truth, they reason, but it simply reveals a truth that should be
regarded as complementary to the truths at other levels of analysis. This of
course invites the question "which of the levels of analysis is ultimate?" or
"how do the truths from different levels of analysis relate to each other?".
(...)
The principal proponents of the
Humanizer of Science position within secular psychology are those in the
"third-force" movement of clinical psychology, e.g. Abraham Maslow, Carl
Rogers or Gordon Allport. There is much in these movements with which many
Christians can agree. The person is regarded as a unified self, the person's
choice is seen to be of critical importance, and values are presumed to be
critical not only in daily life but in science itself. The individual is
regarded as transcending the natural order to some extent rather than being
only a determined victim of material causes, and the healthy response of such
individuals is regarded as not simply conforming to a fixed environment but
exercising one's capacity for creativity to forge new paths. The client in a
therapy room or the participant in an experiment is regarded as another person
to be encountered and with whom to dialogue.
Humanizers of science also find
support among those revisionist philosophers of science such as Thomas Kuhn or
Michael Polanyi who stress the importance of psychological and cultural
factors in all of science, not just the human sciences. Thus, the scientist,
by these lights, is necessarily working within the framework of a given
paradigm which can be regarded as a world view, based like the Christian world
view in part on faith commitments, and personal loyalties (Kuhn, 1970).
(...)
We would not dispense with
attempts at objective, quantitative research in the human sciences but we
would endorse efforts to take advantage, even in such studies, of the
self-reflective capacities of the research participants to offer their own
hypotheses about their actions which are being monitored in such research.
Similarly, we would explicitly want to encourage research that makes explicit
the relevant assumptions about human nature derived from the Christian view of
man. Given the same God authored the special revelation of Scripture and
created in his own image the people psychologist study, conceptual models
derived from Scriptural assumptions about human nature should have an inherent
advantage in terms to their fit to behavior relative to those that are not
based on this solid foundation.
(...)
References (selections)
(...)
Evans, C. S. (1977).
Preserving the person: A look at the human sciences. Grand Rapids, MI:
Baker Book House.
Evans, C. S. (1996). Wisdom
and humanness in psychology: Prospects for a Christian approach.
Vancouver, B.C., Canada: Regent College Publishing.
(...)
Jeeves, M.A. (1976). Psychology
and Christianity: The view both ways. Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press.
Jones, S. L. (Ed.) (1986).
Psychology and the Christian faith. Grand Rapids, MI: Baker.
Jones, S. L, & Butman, R. E.
(1991). Modern psychotherapies: A comprehensive Christian appraisal. Downers
Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press.
Koteskey, R. L. (1980).
Psychology from a Christian perspective. Nashville: Abingdon Press.
(...)
Myers, D. G. (1978). The human
puzzle: Psychological research and Christian belief. San Francisco: Harper &
Row.
Myers, D. G., & Jeeves, M. A.
(1987). Psychology through the eyes of faith. San Francisco: Harper & Row.
(...)
Van Leeuwen, M. S. (1985). The
person in psychology: A contemporary Christian appraisal. Grand Rapids, MI:
Eerdmans.
(...)
Watts, F., & Williams, M.
(1988). The psychology of religious knowing. Cambridge, England: Cambridge
University Press.
(...)
Please consult the original
entire article to be found here:
www.leaderu.com/aip/docs/delaney-goldsmith.html
=======================================
You can note from the above brief
selection that the authors realize that a positive bias in science is needed to defeat the
negative bias of scientific materialism. But they do not offer any new
knowledge, facts, information from the positive bias perspective. Actually we
need to examine their books to see what they have to offer. They could be
offering to look at the revelations God provides in Sacred Scripture. They could
propose that scientific psychology in the positive bias could study God
from Sacred Scripture, which is "God's Word" according to all Christians, as
they point out. There is a whole set of concepts that psychology could examine
from the New Testament Sacred Scripture, as for example, what is heaven and hell
in relation to the mind? Or, what is the relationship we can have with God in
daily life? Or, what principles does God use to manage people's lives? Or, what
does God say about the afterlife of eternity?
Theistic psychology considers
these topics, and many more. This is possible for theistic psychology because it
bases its methodology on the correspondential sense of Sacred Scripture, rather
than on its literal sense, which is the only sense they probably considered, not
knowing of the existence of the correspondential sense (see
Section 1.0.5.5.5). But because
the correspondential sense of Sacred Scripture is a scientific methodology
anyone can test its adequacy and objectivity. This approach may be called
substantive dualism in science.
1.0.7 What is Substantive Dualism
in Science
Science is the systematic, rational, and
observational study of the universe and of reality.
Science creates rational explanations for
observed facts and strives to create an overall integrated understanding of the universe,
its parts and how they interact by lawful mechanisms to produce the variety of
phenomena that exist.
Psychology as a science strives to unify
the observations and explanations of human behavior into a rational and comprehensive account.
There are however methodological difficulties to overcome when we study mental
phenomena such as feelings, thoughts, and sensations. Two opposing approaches
have been adopted in the history of psychology, one monist, the other
dualist. The monist approach in science is based on the unproven assumption or
belief that both the mind and the body are made of physical matter, space,
and energy. Note that this assumption is unproven and may be wrong. It may be
that the mind is not made of physical matter like the physical body and brain.
We will need to consider what other scientific proposals exist for explaining
what the mind is made of and what the physical body is
made of.
The dualist approach
in theistic psychology is based on the empirical
reports given by Swedenborg showing that the mind is of a different substance
than the physical body, and lives or exists not in the natural world but in a
world outside time and space called the spiritual world of "eternity." The mind
and the body interact through the laws of "correspondences" while the physical
body is alive. But when it dies, the mind then continues a life of immortality
in the spiritual world. The dualist approach refers to the existence of two
functionally interconnected worlds, one in time-space, the other outside of it.
Feelings, thoughts, and sensations are phenomena in the spiritual world, while
electro-chemical firings of neurons in the brain are phenomena in the natural
world.
Scientists since Aristotle have proposed
that the universe is made of two kinds of "stuff." The physical world is made of
stuff called "matter," while the mental world is made of stuff called "substance."
Matter is physical or material and has the property of time, space, and mass.
Substance is spiritual or non-material, and does not have the property of mass,
space, or time.
Consider your thoughts, feelings,
daydreams, fantasies, and dreams--they do not occupy space, mass, or time.
Dreams and sensations are not physical. Before Swedenborg, dualist scientists
like Descartes or Leibniz, had no observational evidence to suggest to them what
thoughts and sensations were made of or where thoughts were, if not in the physical
brain and body. But since the Swedenborg reports (published 1743-1771) dualism in science
has become "substantive dualism." By coining this phrase I mean to reflect the fact that the
mental world is a spiritual world and that all thoughts and feelings are
spiritual operations located in the mind. The mind is a real spiritual organ
that has multiple parts made of spiritual fibers and neurons, which are constructed out of
substances collected from the Spiritual Sun and its constant outpouring of
spiritual substances. All things in the natural world are made of matter and
energy that come from the sun or stars. All things in the spiritual world are
made of substances that come from the Spiritual Sun, which is the only sun
there, and permeates the entire spiritual world. Within this sun, the Divine
Human is visible. The Spiritual Sun is thus an aura surrounding the visible
Divine Human. It is the interface God uses to create the universe and to
communicate with the human race.
In substantive dualism, thoughts and
sensations cannot exist unless they are made of some stuff that can operate
somewhere in some functioning spiritual or mental organ. This stuff is a substance that forms the
rational ether around the
Spiritual Sun in the spiritual world. In order to understand this more
concretely, think of the universe as "dual." The outside of it is made of physical
space created by the natural suns or stars that populate this outer (physical)
portion of the universe. The inner (spiritual) portion of the universe is not
visible to the outer physical world. It is created by means of the Spiritual Sun
which creates a spiritual or rational atmosphere around itself. The substance of this
atmosphere can be called "rational ether." Our thoughts and feelings exist in
this rational sphere. It is impossible for sensations, thoughts, and feelings to
exist in an electrical or chemical atmosphere in space-time.
We are born dual citizens of this
universe. The physical body is born in the outer natural world and is built up from
the materials of the physical sun and stars. The mental body, or the organ of
the mind, is born at the same time in the spiritual world of rational ether. It
grows and is built up by the substances it gathers from the rational ether that
streams out of the Spiritual Sun. For instance, when we eat with our physical body in the
natural world, our mind in the spiritual world is simultaneously experiencing sensations. Thus, the operations in the physical body and the operations in
the mental body (or mind) are functionally connected to each other and operate
in lawful correspondence (see Section xx).
When the physical body is no longer able
to carry out its functions, it "dies." On the other hand, the mental
body or organ continues its operations in the spiritual world, as it always has. Swedenborg was unique in that he has lived consciously as a dual
citizen for 27 years. Thus, although he had no special abilities other than what
everyone has, he was able to be conscious of the spiritual-mental world while he
was still attached to his physical body on earth. As a result of this unique
situation, Swedenborg was able to give us the observations that we all will
be able to confirm, once we are resuscitated at the death of the physical body (see Section
xx).
Quoting from the Writings Sacred
Scripture:
CL 326 Seeing them from my lodging I came into the
spirit, and in the spirit I went out to them; and I approached the chief
teacher, who lately had proposed the question concerning the soul. When he saw
me he said, "Who are you? I wondered, when I saw you approaching in the way,
that now you came into my sight and the next moment passed out of sight, or
that at one moment you were visible to me and suddenly became invisible. You
certainly are not in our state of life."
To this I answered, smiling, "I am not a player of tricks,
nor one who changes himself; but am an alternate, now in your light, now in
your shade, and thus foreign and also native." At this the chief teacher
looked at me and said, "You say strange and amazing things. Tell me who you
are." I said, "I am in the world in which you were, and from which you
departed, which is called the natural world; and I also am in the world to
which you came and in which you are, which is called the spiritual world. I am
therefore in a natural state, and at the same time in a spiritual state; in
the natural state with men on earth, and in the spiritual state with you; and
when I am in the natural state I am not visible to you, but when in the
spiritual state I am visible. That I am so has been given by the Lord. To you,
O enlightened man, it is known that the man of the natural world does not see
the man of the spiritual world, nor the reverse; therefore when I let my
spirit down into the body, I was not visible to you, and when I raised it out
of the body I became visible." (CL 326)
The mind is therefore an organ made of
rational ether or spiritual substance, just as the physical brain is an organ
made of physical matter and space. Materialistic scientists reject this
substantive view of the mind and prefer to argue that thoughts, feelings, and
fantasies are not real, so they are not made of matter or stuff. They refer to
the mind as an "epiphenomenon" of the brain, that is, something unreal that
appears real but isn't. As soon as the physical brain dies, there is no mind, no
self, no person. But dualist scientists argue that when the physical brain dies,
the mind continues to live--not on earth but in the spiritual world where it was
born and will always remain.
The mind-body controversy has gone on for
centuries among scholars of Europe and its history is reviewed in most history
of psychology textbooks, which usually take the issue all the way back to
Aristotle and Plato, both of whom were dualists. Descartes is the modern dualist best
known to psychology students. As we examine the psychology of the 20th century,
of which I was a part, all dualism disappears from the main scientific
literature. Today, few psychology majors can say that they have had to study any
dualists among the dozens of psychologists whose work they had to read or
memorize. The
reason for this is the powerful influence of the negative bias in science. Materialistic
science has a negative bias that automatically discounts and rejects dualism and accepts
materialistic monism, even though
there is no scientific proof for either position.
This book is therefore most unusual and may represent a new
trend that might grow in the future of psychology. Theistic psychology is based
on only one author's work--Swedenborg-- a fact that both surprises and
understandably bothers
some people. But we have no choice in this because Swedenborg is the
only scientist who had observational access to the spiritual world for almost
three decades of dual consciousness. I am
excluding other "claims" many people make that they are able to
talk to spirits or psychically communicate with the dead, or that God speaks to
them, or that they can attain "oneness" with God, etc. I have never been impressed by any of these claims and have never
found anything scientific and rational in them. Of
course, they are not scientists. Swedenborg is the first and only modern
scientist to have made the claim of being conscious in both worlds
simultaneously on a long term basis.
When I first came across Swedenborg's reports in 1981 I was
delighted because I did not have to face someone's mere speculations and beliefs about the
spiritual world. Instead I was presented with the observational evidence and the
rational explanations that, as a scientist, I expected and demanded for any
scientific account of the human mind. I only
had to make sure that I was evaluating the evidence critically. When I became a scientist in my early
twenties I retained no interest in mystical experiences of the type that psychologist
William James discusses in his book The Varieties of
Religious Experiences (see
Reading List).
I was looking for rational evidence of God and the afterlife, not visions and
mystical experiences of "oneness" with God claimed by this or that person.
Emanuel Swedenborg
(1688-1772) was the first and only respected scientist in history who wrote a
large collection of scientific works detailing his direct observational experiences in what he called
"the spiritual world."
For the last 27 years of his life on earth he was able to be
conscious in both worlds--the world on this earth, in which he was a Swedish
government engineer and member of parliament, and the spiritual world, in which
he was able to move and travel and talk to the people who were there and observe
their life. Swedenborg's careful daily notes and explanations amount to nearly 30 volumes
in English translation. These books are now in most academic and public
libraries in the U.S., as well as on CDs and online on the Internet. Obviously Swedenborg's
Writings have attracted a large audience over the past two centuries due their
unique content.
The Writings of Swedenborg
are available online and searchable at:
www.theheavenlydoctrines.org
www.smallcanonsearch.com/
www.swedenborgdigitallibrary.org/index1a.html
In 1981 while I was browsing the shelves
of Hamilton Library at the University of Hawaii, I discovered the collection of Swedenborg books and began to
read them. I did not know anything about Swedenborg despite my familiarity
with the literature in psychology (I earned a Ph.D. degree from McGill
University in 1962). I quickly realized as I was reading, why Swedenborg is never
referred to in modern psychology. I was taught to have a very strong negative bias against
God and the afterlife as explanatory concepts in psychology. When I taught History of Psychology courses I became
familiar with the several of the textbooks in that field. Not one ever mentioned Swedenborg
even though others who were dualist were mentioned, like Plato, Descartes, Malherbes,
and Leibniz, among others. I realized that the reason is that Swedenborg was a different kind
of dualist, quite unique. To reflect the difference, I coined a new phrase for
his approach: "substantive dualism," which could also be called "theistic
dualism."
This term reflects the idea that
Swedenborg's dualism involves the existence of two worlds, one natural or
material and the other spiritual or substantive. While this is a familiar idea
in the history of theology and philosophy, it has never reached the halls of
science until Swedenborg. The word "substance" has two opposite usages, one
traditional and another modern, as we are told in the dictionary. The traditional meaning has been long used in
philosophy and may be defined as the "essential nature" of something, or the
"ultimate reality that underlies all outward manifestations and change." The
modern meaning of substance is "physical material from which something is made or
which has discrete existence" and also, "matter of particular or definite
chemical constitution." The modern meaning is monist and materialist,
while the traditional meaning is dualist or spiritual.
The "essential nature" of something refers
to the "ultimate reality that underlies" it, and this is called "spiritual." The
essential or underlying reality of physical things cannot be physical, by
definition. Something cannot be its own underlying reality. This must be "substantive," which is spiritual. The spiritual is
therefore the essential (underlying) reality of the natural, its infrastructure. The spiritual is
a discrete degree "within" the
natural and imparts life and function to it (see Section xx). The essential
underlying infrastructure of something physical must be
outside time-space in order to make up the essential component of that which is
in time-space. The spiritual is "apart from" the natural, that is, not in time-space.
The two form a dual universe, one in time-space called natural,
the other apart from or within time-space called spiritual eternity. Mental events are
spiritual. The spiritual within and the natural outside are connected
functionally to each other by the laws of correspondences (see Section xx).
When we pass into the afterlife, our
consciousness exits the natural mind and awakens to the spiritual world in the
spiritual mind, where
it continues life forever. This is the world Swedenborg was able to explore
through his dual citizenship. This is the world in which he found the people who
had lived in this world and were now in the immortality of their afterlife. He
talked to people he knew as authors from the world's literature. He talked to
neighbors and acquaintances of his in Sweden who had already passed on ahead of
him. He described the cities he saw and what they were made of (not physical
matter!). He described the laws of the spiritual world, which are the laws of
the mental world. He ran experiments to see how people reacted when certain
mental facts were removed from their memory or else fabricated for them (see
Section xx).
He
described the laws of correspondences which were plain to his senses. He
discovered the origin of Sacred Scripture and the language of spiritual
correspondences in which they were written. And many other things besides this,
relating to the inhabitants of other planets to whom he talked to once they
entered their afterlife in the spiritual world (see Section xx). The entire human race of all
times and places congregates in the spiritual world and any person can talk to
any other person in accordance with the laws of the spiritual world. No one
before Swedenborg had direct access to a any of these facts. His Writings mark
the beginning of a new modern age of consciousness for the entire human race.
From these considerations you can see that every object has
an outward portion and an underlying portion, and these two portions are in
different worlds or degrees of existence. The outward portion of your shoes is
made of physical matter from the natural sun of which the planet is
made. But the underlying portion of your shoes is made of spiritual substances
from the Spiritual Sun (see Section xx).
What is the underlying framework,
essential infrastructure, or spiritual substance out of which your
physical shoe is built?
It is the planning, designing, and use of the shoe. These are
spiritual phenomena in the minds of human beings, not in the natural world in
which the shoe is.
The physical existence and reality of your shoe is based on
its use -- why people designed it and why you bought it.
The spiritual is the cause of the natural, while the natural is
only an
effect.
In other words, the intention, the thinking, planning, and
designing of shoes are rational or spiritual operations, not physical,
It is this rational or spiritual portion of the shoe's existence that has
created the physical shoe. Further, the cause remains connected to the effect.
The cause-effect sequence -- or spiritual-natural sequence, operates by the laws
of successive discrete degrees, but the connection of the cause (spiritual) to
the effect (natural) is in simultaneous discrete degrees (see Section xx).
It is the same with every object in this physical world --
the cause that created it is spiritual or mental. The Spiritual Sun is nothing
but the mental operation of God carried out within spiritual substances. These
Divine mental operations are the substances out of which the rational ether is
made of, and thus what the organ of our mind is made of. The mental is therefore
the cause and underlying reality of the physical. The two are always connected
by the laws of correspondence.
The traditional meaning of substance refers to the underlying or inner framework of something
upon which the outer structure
is built. The "stance" in the word "substance" comes from Latin "to stand" so that
"sub" - "stance" refers to that which stands below or is underlying. For
instance, if you think of an iceberg, what you see above the surface of the
ocean is the outward structure, while the underlying portion is not visible yet
much larger and more dangerous to ships.
Or, think of the sentences you create when you speak or
write. The words strung in a sentence make up the outward portion while
the grammar that puts the words in the right order is the underlying portion.
The sentence is "generated" by the grammar so as to serve the speaker's
intentions. The speaker's intention is the mental or spiritual cause of the
physical sentence that is put together by the grammar we have learned.
This is the fundamental thesis of substantive dualism in theistic
psychology. The outward portion of the
individual human being is a physical body made of matter from the natural sun,
while the underlying portion of the individual human being is the mind made of
substances from the Spiritual Sun. The former is mortal, because made of
temporary matter; the latter, immortal, because made of substances outside
time-space.
Substantive dualism recognizes two different suns, one
natural, the other spiritual. Each creates its own world around itself. The
natural sun creates planets and gravity fields, while the Spiritual Sun creates natural suns and
human minds.
When human beings are born they are made of two distinct portions, each
being born in its own world but functionally connected together by the laws of
correspondence. The outward temporary portion is born
on earth and is the physical body. The underlying eternal portion is born in the
spiritual world and is the mind as a spiritual organ or mental body. The physical body and the
mental body grow together
and act as functionally one by correspondence. When the physical body dies, the mind continues to live in the
spiritual world forever (called "eternity").
You can see from this that substantive dualism is the view
that there are two worlds, one natural and the other spiritual. The natural
world is in time and space and has mass, while the spiritual world is in
rational ether, thus not having space, time, or matter--it is limitless and
eternal. This view was held by most ancient writers though there was no proof of
it since no one was able to "come back from the dead" and tell their story. As a
result, dualism and the eternal afterlife was abandoned by modern scientists who focused only on the physical
world. But Swedenborg reopened the issue in modern science by being able to be
conscious in both worlds simultaneously. No other scientist has ever made this kind of claim. If true, then
Swedenborg's observations constitute the first scientific proof that the
spiritual world actually exists and that substantive dualism is the correct
approach in science. It is also proof that human beings are immortal and that
there is a heaven and a hell.
When Swedenborg suddenly acquired the ability to be conscious in both worlds simultaneously, he was a well known and respected scientist known throughout Western
Europe. His scientific publications included explanations of dualism in
terms of the spiritual causes within every natural phenomenon. He regarded
every natural phenomenon as an effect of a prior spiritual phenomenon. His
dualism at that time was substantive, but he had no direct evidence of the
existence of substances from the spiritual world. As a result, his early
scientific books, up to age 57, were admired by many, but not included in the
rapid development of several sciences in his century--physics, chemistry,
physiology, anatomy. Swedenborg's books on these topics were not included in the
mainstream of 18th century science. Instead, he became known as a theologist and
religious revelator when he started publishing his later books on the spiritual
world. I am possibly the first modern scientist who sees Swedenborg's books as
science books rather than theology books.
Swedenborg's dualism prior to his dual
consciousness was not demonstrably substantive. He had no scientific knowledge
about the spiritual world, though he assumed that it must exist. How astonished
he was during those first few months when he suddenly started being aware of the
spiritual world! He was at first disoriented, but he quickly adapted to his new
lifestyle. He continued his official duties, travels, and publications while
this started happening to him, and he also kept careful daily notes of his
observations. The collection of his 30 volumes constitute a unique record
in the history of humankind and his books have influenced many key authors and
thinkers in the18th and 19th centuries. And today his influence continues on the
Internet. Soon his influence will extend to all of science (I predict).
Scientists, scholars, and biographers who
have examined Swedenborg's unique record have had two main reactions: (1) he was
a great genius, but he was deluded; (2) he was sane and honest and was one of
the great minds of all of literary history.
I have had the second reaction and after
years of careful study, I came to the conclusion that the Writings of Swedenborg
present the greatest scientific discovery since the beginning of science. I then
started my research efforts in trying to incorporate into psychology the data
Swedenborg recorded in the Writings. He wrote in Neo-Latin which was the
language of scientists in the 17th century and his books have been translated
into many languages.
In order to incorporate Swedenborg's Writings into
modern scientific psychology, I had to overcome two
difficulties: the negative bias against dualism and that against God. Substantive dualism, or the world of spirits, was
unknown in psychology except in abnormal and clinical psychology where "spirits"
were reported by delusional patients. Some of Swedenborg's detractors called him
delusional because he claimed to talk to "spirits" in the spiritual world. The
second obstacle was the concept of God which has been automatically excluded
from "non-theistic" science that started in the 20th century. The concept of God
formed an essential pivot role in Swedenborg's substantive dualism and could not
be left out from a serious attempt to incorporate Swedenborg's dualism into
modern psychology. God and dualism cannot be separated in science because the
spiritual world has no meaning without God. Unlike the natural world where God
is invisible to the physical senses, the spiritual world reveals God as an
essential partner in the person's life. God is visible in the spiritual world
because when we are cut off from our physical body, we are "spirits," which
means being conscious in the spiritual world. God appears visually as a
Divine Human in the midst of the Spiritual Sun. Swedenborg was able to see this just
like the rest of the inhabitants of the spiritual world, all of whom had been
born on some planet in the physical universe.
One may think this kind of report to be
preposterous and outside the scope of science.
When thinking in the negative bias mode, this would be the case.
But
it should be considered that Swedenborg's record is an exceptional and unique case that
becomes evident when his reports are analyzed. It is
totally without precedent in the history of humankind where a well known
scientist and noted community member, declares in his published writings that he
was given by God the special and unique ability to be conscious in both
worlds for the purpose of bringing to humankind the scientific proof of our
immortality in the afterlife .
It was Swedenborg's understanding that
he was not "picked" but prepared since childhood to become the kind of scientist
that would have the reputation and genius to pull this off, if I may put it that
way (see Chapter 13). Insurmountable heaps of opposition were surely forthcoming
from the other scientists when one of among them dares to make such an unheard
of claim. Yet Swedenborg was able to keep his job and to finish up his
scientific publications, and then to begin a new series of publications called
the Writings (1743-1771) in which he tells the world of his unique situation,
along with careful notes and explanations.
The proof that he succeeded is that more
than 200 years later a modern scientist like myself can unexpectedly run into
his 30 Volumes in the library of our university, translated into English, and I
can read his work, understand it rationally, and see that it is valid. And this same
proof has been accepted by other scientists who likewise did what I did -- see
for example the Web site of physics professor Dr. Ian Thompson of England:
www.TheisticScience.org as well as
others mentioned in the
Reading List of collateral literature.
Anyone can investigate whether this is so or not.
How do other psychologists react when I
explain that I have found the Writings of Swedenborg to be rational, scientific,
and valid?
The choices about me are similar as with
Swedenborg: (1) I am not a scientist and am delusional; (2) I am experienced and
sane. These two choices apply to Dr. Thompson and all the others you can
investigate who have found the Writings of Swedenborg to be rational and valid.
To pick choice (1) is called the negative bias in science because it is only a general
reaction to the topic and its theistic and dualist concepts. To pick choice (2)
is called the positive bias in science because it is only a general reaction to the topic
of God and the spiritual world, and perhaps to my reputation as a professor for
the past 40 years. Whichever choice you make is a bias, but they
have vastly different consequences.
If you opt for the negative
bias in science against
Swedenborg you deny yourself the possibility of examining the evidence in full. You can
rationally examine the report only if you read it with a view to understanding it critically
and rationally. One can read the Writings in the negative bias just to prove
that Swedenborg was mad and that the ideas in there are fantastic and
delusional. Of course this is not a fair or objective assessment. But with the
positive bias in science you are granting in advance that the
report may be true. In the negative bias in science you are not granting that the report
may be true. This is then the big difference.
It's correct to call the negative
bias in science
approach as "biased." This is because the conclusion that Swedenborg's reports
cannot be true and must be delusional, is a conclusion not based on the evidence
presented. The evidence was not examined except perhaps in part and only with
the view of finding a way of rejecting it. The arguments for rejection of
Swedenborg's Writings have not been objective or rational. They merely deny that
a scientist can gain entrance into heaven and hell and see God. But we must
inquire whether this is a rational response. Why is it not possible that God
exists and that He can admit anyone into heaven or hell?
A traditional answer might be that
"science is about the physical world, while God, heaven, and hell are not
physical in time and space. Therefore to bring God into a scientific theory or
explanation is to try to bring in something irrelevant or outside the scope of
science. And this should not be allowed or it will weaken or destroy science."
Everyone educated knows this traditional
objection since it is taught in public schools everywhere. But this objection is
not valid if dualism is reality.
If dualism is reality then there is a
spiritual world where God is visible and determines what happens in our mind.
Swedenborg is a reputable scientist who has confirmed it by observation. I am a
reputable scientist who has rationally confirmed Swedenborg's reports and
explanations. Others like me exist and have written about it. Clearly one cannot
reasonable dismiss both Swedenborg and all the scientists and scholars who have
confirmed the rationality and objectivity of the evidence.
The purpose of this book is to critically
examine the premises of theistic psychology and to evaluate whether it is
possible for psychology to be theistic and still remain a science.
National surveys over many years
consistently show that the vast majority of Americans assume that there is a
Divine Person to whom an individual can talk, and be heard by Him, and that God
intervenes and controls the course of all events through infinite Love and
Wisdom. non-theistic psychology's position has been to dismiss these explanations
about God's influence on events and behavior and to prevent these ideas from
entering the science of psychology. However today it has become clear that this
exclusion of God from scientific explanations is a premise adopted by scientists
without actual proof, and that it is not necessarily a rational premise. Hence it
is a negative bias in science without proof.
Therefore it makes sense to explore the
alternative premise, which is that the cause of every event and behavior is God
who is an intelligent Person, though infinite, who is carrying out a rational goal from loving
motives. But it is necessary to go beyond religious ideas and to establish the
rationality of God in science independently of religion, culture, and times.
Theistic science, and theistic psychology, are therefore pan-cultural and above
all religions or cultures.
There are two positions one can take about the
proposal of introducing God into science. According to one position--the
negative bias, scientists automatically exclude God from scientific
explanations. This may be called the negative bias in science since there is no
way of proving empirically that God does not exist. The other approach may be
called the positive bias in science since it accepts the possibility of
God's existence without being able to prove it first. But while the negative
bias in science continues unproven as a permanent position, the positive bias in
science allows us to
examine the evidence. Once the evidence is examined, and seen as valid, the
positive bias in science is no longer a bias but a proof. The negative bias in
science remains a bias.
I once had the following conversation with a
colleague, a scientist in the field of biochemistry and genetics. I was eager to show him
that there is a rational way of defining God in science.
Leon James: I'm not violating
any of your rational rules when I propose that we make a logical distinction between two
types of things. Things that have a beginning and things that do not have a beginning. Is
that all right?
Colleague: Yes.
Leon James: Good. Now let's
add that the things that have a beginning may or may not have an end. For example,
counting is a process that starts at 1 and then goes on indefinitely unless stopped. So
counting, and number series, and possibly the entire physical universe could be in the
category of having a beginning but not necessarily an end, though many things have an end
like a rain shower, or an earthquake, or a century. So to summarize, we're not violating
any rational rules by saying that the physical universe had a beginning and may not have
an end. Now the other category, namely things that have no beginning.
Colleague: What kind of a
thing is that?
Leon James: For the moment
let's just call it the X Factor. So the X Factor is something that has had no beginning,
and let's add, it doesn't have an end. It's not violating any of your rational rules to
propose that an X Factor exists, right?
Colleague: Well, I suppose I
can't find anything strictly wrong with making such an assumption. And that's all it is,
an assumption. Unproven. Just something you can think about.
Leon James: OK. Let's state
it explicitly. It's not irrational to suppose that there is something that has no
beginning and no end. And when we say that it's not irrational to suppose that, then it
also means that it's rational. To summarize: it's rational to assume
that the physical universe has a beginning but that there is something else, something not
physical, that has no beginning. Agreed?
Colleague: Yes, it's rational
to suppose this but it's not proven. It could just be nothing but a supposition.
Leon James: I understand what
you're saying. Now I propose that we give a name to this X Factor and I'd like to call it
God. To repeat then, it's rational to assume that there is a God that has always existed
and as well, that there is a physical universe that has a beginning in existence. Correct?
Colleague: Correct. Just a
supposition. And I agree that it's rational since it's not irrational. But being rational
doesn't mean that it's true or actual or real.
Leon James: I see what you're
saying. Right now it's only necessary that we establish the truth that God is a rational
concept in science. There is
nothing unscientific, irrational or illogical about assuming God's existence. Now the next step is to make another assumption that
is perfectly rational, namely, that God is responsible for the existence of
all things that have a beginning. This is both logical, practical, and
necessary, as long as we assume that there is God and that God has no
beginning and no end.
Notice that God's rational definition includes or
implies the idea that God is infinite. If God were not infinite it would not
be logical to say that God is responsible for creating all things that exist
that have a beginning (but possibly no end), as we established before. So
only if we assume that God is infinite can we accept the idea as rational,
namely that God is responsible for the universe. Agreed so far?
Colleague: Yes, fine. You can
rationally suppose, if you want to, that God is infinite and is responsible for creating
the universe that itself is not infinite since it has a beginning, even if it has no end.
Leon James: Excellent. Now to
continue, it doesn't violate any rational rule to suppose further that the infinite God
has a structure and a particular content, just as the finite world has a structure and a
content. It's perfectly rational to suppose that the infinite God has a particular inner
essence and outer layers of structure. All of these things belonging to God are of course infinite with no
beginning or limit.
Colleague: Fine, God has an
essence and a structure and these are infinite. That's still rational. Structures and
layers that are infinite may be rational--but are they real or just rational suppositions?
Leon James: We're getting to
that too. Now the next assumption is also perfectly rational and doesn't
violate any scientific logic, namely, that God's essence and structure are
Human. I mean human in the sense that science defines what is human at
different levels--genetic, physiological, anatomical, psychological, social,
and moral. In other words, these finite human characteristics exist as they
do because they are representative finite copies of God's infinite qualities
and structures.
In other words, God is the only true and
actual Human Person, in an infinite form and existence, who has always been
in existence--unlike people who are finite creations with a beginning. These
facts about God's essence and structure are described in detail in the
scientific revelations given by God to the human race since the dawn of
history. Contemporary versions of these scientific revelations have been
preserved as Sacred Scripture by all the major religions on this earth.
So to summarize our progress so far: God who
is the Infinite Human, or the Divine Human, created the beginning point for the existence
of the universe and is responsible for its continued existence and growth through rational
laws of order called the Laws of Divine Providence.
Colleague: All right, a set
of suppositions that may be rational but have never been proven. I admit that at first I
would have said that God has no place in science as a concept because it introduces
mystical and undefined elements over which we have no control, and science ends there,
shattered. But I can see that there is a way of defining the concept of God in science
without violating any rational rules of operation and thinking. Would you care to
continue? How does God manage this universe?
Leon James: Swedenborg's Writings contain many scientific facts about how God runs the
universe. In order to understand how God manages the universe we need to accept a few
basic premises that will ensure that we continue to stay rational in all our statements
about God and the universe. For instance, one of these basic premises is this: Nothing disconnected can exist. In other words, God runs the universe by being an
omnipresent, omniscient, and omnipotent Creator and Manager. A revelation in Swedenborg's
Writings is that God is
everywhere--in all time and in all place--but not in time and place but apart from time and space. In other words we must
acquire a new rational idea or operation in the universe--namely, the property or
phenomenon of being omnipresent but not in time and space.
This idea posits rational structures that
are able to comprehend and describe the relation between the infinite and the finite, that
is, the relation between God and the various pieces of the created universe.
Colleague: That's a big
mouthful, doctor. But I'm still with you. What you're saying are a set of propositions
that interact with each other and I must admit they are all possible, all rational. But
are they true?
Leon James: Remember that
we're not trying to prove that God exists--this was the assumption from the start, not the
proof. We're only trying to prove that the concept of God can be rational and can be
introduced into science without violating rational rules of inference and inquiry. This is
theistic science, that is, science that works within the premises of God's existence and
the scientific revelations God has given to the human race. Swedenborg calls these the Laws of Divine Providence and he is the first scientist to
demonstrate that the Laws of Divine Providence are rational and
human.
Study Questions:
1. Explain the Swedenborg reports in relation to the positive bias in
science. What happened to him? What did he discover? Describe how you manage to
take on the positive bias in science regarding the Swedenborg reports.
2. What is the purpose of Sacred Scripture? How is it meant to be used?
3. Explain the two senses we can find in Sacred Scripture. Give several
illustrations from this Section.
4. Give two illustrations not found in this Section, so you will need
to search for this in Volume 18. Make sure you indicate which Section(s) you
took your two examples from. How do you react to being told that there is a
hidden scientific sense in Sacred Scripture, that is unsuspected to most
scholars?
5. What is rational spirituality in relation to God? Explain how we can
comprehend higher spiritual ideas by means of the new mental organ called
spiritual-natural or interior-natural organ. How did it come into existence?
Describe its role in the evolution of human consciousness. How do you react to
these ideas that apply to your own mind?
6. Explain why substantive dualism is called substantive.
7. What is the most exciting piece of news you have hears so far in theistic
psychology?
8. List some objections you or your friends can come up with against the
Swedenborg reports, against the positive bias in science, against the inclusion
of God in science, and similar issues. Be sure you comment on each issue you
list -- (a) what the doubt is and (b) what your current position is on it.
9. Make up a dialogue between you and a hypothetical friend in a situation
where you are telling your friend about this course. No length is specified. It
depends on how you write the dialog. You can add lines of explanations, like a
stage play, if you want.
1.1
Three Levels of Thinking About God
|
↑
Read Chart from Bottom Up
(1, 2, 3)
↑
|
|
LEVEL OF
RATIONALITY |
MAIN FEATURES |
|
THEISTIC
PSYCHOLOGY
3
|
(a) God is the cause of every
natural event and all human behavior, including the sequence of thoughts and
feelings we have.
(b) In the Writings of Swedenborg, God has revealed scientific
facts about the structure of the universe, about the anatomy of the human
mind, and the details of life after death. Therefore all explanations about
causes of events and of behavior must include God and the mechanisms by which
God intervenes and manages the details of all events from beginning to end.
(c)
Those who modify their character to become "heavenly" and rational continue
life to eternity in the heaven of their mind; others in in the "hell" of their
mind, which is delusional and irrational. Both heaven and hell are in the mind
of everyone
and every human being is immortal.
|
|
MYSTICAL
RELIGION
2
|
(a) God is the Divine
infinite Creator who oversees every person's destiny from birth to life after death. God
gives Divine revelation in written
Scripture through the intermediary of a particular individual
called revelator or prophet. Those who are faithful to their religion are
rewarded with an afterlife in heaven, others are punished with an afterlife in hell.
(b) Praying to God sometimes convinces God to give us what we want. Similarly with
rituals and sacrifices. Some rituals can bring us closer to God by allowing us
to experience His presence or to get a feeling of mystical union with Him.
(c) God
can get angry or disgusted with some people who are wicked or "sinful." Some
people called the clergy or priesthood have a special relation to God and they
sometimes can intercede with God to forgive people's sins or to avert a
calamity.
|
|
MATERIALISTIC
SCIENCE
MONISM
NEGATIVE bias in science
1
|
(a) God may have created the
universe (we have no way of knowing), but now it’s running on its own by means
of universal natural laws that are discoverable by science through physical
measurements and abstract theories about them. Today no explanation is accepted in
science that refers to God.
(b) Life after death, or heaven and hell, are not
scientific issues but religious, and they are left to people's personal belief
system which should not impact on their science. Anyone claiming to have seen
God or heaven is automatically to be considered unfit as a rational scientist.
(c) Human behavior is not to be judged by religious ideas but by scientific
assessments. Good and evil are not scientific ideas and do not belong in
science. Ideas from the Bible should not be allowed in public school or
scientific literature. There are many religions each with their own God and
rules, which proves that religion is a cultural belief system, not a
description of how the universe actually is.
|
Explanations of the
Chart now follow.
1.1.1
Level 1:
Materialistic Science (Monism, Negative bias in science)
According to the positive
bias in science, the lowest form of rational
thinking is the denial of God or atheism, but it includes other intellectual
forms and justifications such as materialism, which denies the existence of
anything that isn’t physical. For instance, it asserts that there is no
spiritual world; there is no creation; there is no higher power or higher
intelligence that is not part of the natural universe. In addition, there are other
forms of thinking that deny God such as animism, which asserts that natural
objects are spirits or gods, or that a rock is really alive, and so on. Or else,
the universe is alive as the "Great Spirit," which is again a denial of God as one
Divine Infinite Conscious Rational Human Person from whom all things come
and by whom all things are created, shaped, organized, and managed through
rational laws that operate to bring about an ultimate Divine purpose.
According to this rational view of God, all things that God creates cannot have
life of themselves, neither any power to grow, to act, or to think. This is a
rational consequence of the concept of "omnipotence" which asserts that no other
power can exist but the power of God and in God.
The rational view of God sees
that human beings do not have life from themselves as their own, neither can we
think anything without power. Hence God must supply the power and the
intelligence. Life and rationality are God's qualities. These are uncreate and
infinite. They cannot be given to human beings so that these belong to them. But
God created all things in such a way as to be receptor forms or organs of all
the uncreate things that are infinite in Himself. Hence plants, animals and
human beings have receptor organs for life.
Human beings have receptor
organs for love and truth, both of which are uncreate and infinite, and in God
only. But as receptors, our finite mental organs can react by correspondence to
the continuous inflow and presence of Divine love and truth in our mental
organs. God wills that we receive the inflow of His love and truth as-if they
were our own. His infinitely variable love substance and
infinitely variable truth substance
inflow into our mind through the Spiritual Sun. They then activate by
correspondence a variety of thoughts and feelings that we can experience as our
own. Unless we felt that the love and truth in us is our own, we could not be
happy, nor function as a normal human being.
Those who reject the
objectivity of rational spirituality have evolved a subjective mystical
spirituality of God that depends on the idea of a "nonduality" between God and
human beings. This is the idea that in our deepest and highest core, we human
beings are each the Divine. The ultimate and highest evolution of a human being
is to reach the consciousness of this Divine Being. In other words, what they
call God or Divine is of the same basic substance as human beings. Human beings
and God are the same substance and state. This is a self-realization we attain
when we are able to let go of the illusion and delusion that we are each
individual human beings struggling on a planet to survive. In the intellectual
framework of nonduality the path to God is the path to Self (see my book on
nonduality available online here:
www.soc.hawaii.edu/leonj/nonduality.html ).
You can see from this that
mystical spirituality relies on a sensuous consciousness or experience of God
while rational spirituality relies on a rational consciousness or understanding
of God. This rational understanding is based on God's revelations made in Sacred
Scripture. Since God and created human beings cannot be of one substance, there
is a continuous duality between them that cannot be overcome to eternity. The
things of God in human beings that they feel as-if their own, are not their own.
We feel life and intelligence as if our own, but we know they are God's life and
intelligence in us. We think of the rational analogy with the eye and light. The
light enters the eye and gives us the ability to see. This light does not belong
to the eye and can never be one with the eye. Similarly, the love and truth that
is in us as-if our own, is actually God's love and truth inflowing into the
mind's receptor organs.
Other intellectual forms of
nonduality include theosophy and
spiritism. These belief systems rely on materialistic ideas of God and spirit,
such as the "Spirit of the Times," or, the "subtle realm" of the innate
spiritual forces in the human mind, which itself is sometimes called "divine."
These are anti-rational ideas of God leading to traditions and disciplines of
asceticism, specialized meditation, sexual abstinence, and guru worship. "The
Divine" is then defined as beyond thinking, beyond understanding, beyond
rationality. It cannot be talked about. In rational spirituality based on Divine
revelations, God must be talked about and understood rationally. Without this
direct conscious communication by language and thought, God cannot be
approached.
Another form of nonduality
that denies God is magic because it
attributes powers to things other than God such as devils and "dark forces" or
"energies." Hence for those who believe in magic or practice sorcery, God is not
the only source and cause of all power. They may talk about God as well, but
their idea of God is not really God since to put any limits on God's power is
the same as denial of God. This is because God, by definition, is infinite and
omnipotent, which means that no other power exists. As defined in the
dictionary:
God. capitalized : the supreme or ultimate reality:
The Being who is perfect in power, wisdom, and goodness, and who is worshiped as creator and
ruler of the universe.
The supernatural being conceived as the perfect and
omnipotent and omniscient originator and ruler of the universe; the object of
worship in monotheistic religions.
The denial of God's existence, or
else God's Personal omnipotence, or personhood, automatically precipitates the
thinker into subjective belief systems that are found to be attractive, but
later are discarded in exchange for another one, and so on. If you assume
that God
exists, or at least could exist (the positive bias in science), and you are looking
from that perspective on the
denial of God, it would seem to you that it is similar to an engineer denying that the earth is round.
Or a chemist that would deny that
different
forms of energy exist. Whatever theories and explanations this engineer will
make, will all be false and contrary to reality. By God is meant One Infinite Omnipotent Omniscient Omnipresent Person or Being
who has human purposes and involvements. From this perspective of affirmation of
God, it is contrary to
reality to attribute power or intelligence to other sources such as other gods,
other forces, other energies. In contrast to materialistic non-theistic science, theistic
psychology
starts
with the assumption that God exists as the Infinite Person who makes scientific revelations
about Himself, about creation, about our life after death, and about the
rational rules God uses in managing every detail of the universe.
God communicates these revelations to
humankind in order to encourage people to cooperate with Him in the process of
acquiring a celestial mind. It is the celestial mind that lives in eternal
conjugial joy in the immortality of our afterlife. God's love for humankind
prompts Him to provide these instructional methods by which we can acquire a
celestial character before we pass into the afterlife. One wonders why God
doesn't instruct us orally and directly by appearing to each one of us and
instructing us with the Living Voice of God. Or God can appear at an
international conference or world press release and prove to the scientists and
reporters present that He is indeed God. It's just that simple. Why doesn't God
just do it and put an an end to all this doubt, denial, or fantasy?
God has communicated to humankind many
principles He uses for governing the universe, and the rationality of those
principles fully explains why God does not physically appear to us and set the
record straight in a direct provable fashion. It explains why it is necessary
for God to appear to us only in our rational consciousness, and to avoid the
sensuous consciousness while we are still living in this life. To appear
directly at the United Nations and face the scientists would take our
civilization back to the days of the New Testament two thousand years ago when
God appeared as a physical man born in history on this planet (see section xx).
The appropriate steps of human evolution require that God manifest Himself to us
in our rational consciousness so that we may develop for ourselves rational
proof of His existence in our mind and life. This is the only rational process
that can develop in us a celestial mind that can live in eternal conjugial
heaven. For God to appear miraculously and give physical proof of His existence
would destroy the growth of our celestial mind, when yet this is the very
purpose for which God has created us on earth.
You can see why God would not, could
not, condemn us to enter the life of immortality without the celestial mind we
need to live in heaven.
The purpose of Divine scientific
revelations is to have us think in accordance with these principles. When we
think from these Divinely revealed facts, principles, and truths,
we think rationally and in accordance with the revelations.
Once we think from these revealed truths,
we are challenged by the Divine Psychologist Present with each of us, to will
according to the revealed truths which are in our mind from Sacred Scripture. We
are to will what we think is good. We make hundreds of thousands of decisions
each day and each decision is a situation that God brings to us so that we may
have the opportunity to make a choice of that particular type or in that
particular area of our character and loves. In this way, choice by choice, we
either cooperate with God or not. If we cooperate, we cumulate, and soon all our
choices will be in accordance with God's order. The contrary if we do not
cooperate, in which case we acquire an infernal mind that can live in eternal
hell.
That's the awesome significance of
choice!
Do not think that hundreds of thousands of
choices a day is an exaggerated number. Assume the number is correct. How can
you explain it? This line of thinking will lead you to discover, perhaps for the
first time in your life, that the majority of the choices you make are governed
by your affections and loves that remain outside your focus of conscious
awareness. And yet it is these thousands of individual choices that you make
every day that are building up the mind of your immortality, that is, your
spiritual mind. You can discover your choices by systematic and persistent
self-witnessing (see Section xx). For instance, for a few minutes or hours after
you read this, focus your persistent attention on what your eyeballs are doing.
You will begin to notice that when you don't interfere, your eyes naturally move
here and there as you walk or drive, or as you talk to someone, or when you read
a magazine or watch the TV screen. Be aware of where your eyes are looking,
where they stay longer, where they keep coming back. The movement of the eyes
are directed by your affections and loves -- what you find attractive, what you
are interested in, what arouses which emotion in you, and so on. these are your
affections and loves. They are in charge of what your eyes are doing when you're
not interfering due to some stronger purpose of the moment (e.g., avoiding an
obstacle, or, hiding from others what you're really looking at).
The way your eyes are directed by your
loves is the same way that the rest of your personality is put together. It is
not by means of your conscious awareness that you put yourself together. You put
yourself together by means of the sub-conscious loves you inherited and which
shape your developing character (see Section xx). A similar useful discipline is
to put mirrors around the house and to study your expressions. Also, recording
your speaking and other sounds you make throughout the day (see Section xx).
From the perspective of the positive
bias in science,
the denial of God would be the bottom of the scale of rational thinking defined
as thinking with revealed truths about reality. But those who reject the
assumptions of theistic psychology will naturally reject the idea that atheism
is irrational and instead, will see it as irrational and unscientific to assume
God's existence and direct influence on every detail. You will no doubt be
hearing these two sides echoing in your mind as you study theistic psychology.
Recall the argument:
Materialistic science assumes
that all phenomena are to be discovered or identified by physical measurements,
or abstractions based on physical measurements. It rejects the use of God as an explanatory concept in science because such a concept is
not physical and cannot be measured or abstracted from other concepts that are
based on physical measurements. Instead we must assume that the natural
world and physical forces have their own laws that must be discovered
independently of any appeal to God or a spiritual world that cannot be detected
or measured by physical instruments, or derived from other concepts based on
physical measurements. Psychology today has adopted this
"physicalistic" and "non-theistic" bias in science so that the mental world of thoughts
and feelings are considered "epiphenomena," that is, not real. The real part, it
asserts, is the brain activity, which consists of electrical and chemical events
firing in certain sequences.
According to this materialistic outlook,
all human behavior, including thinking and feeling, is nothing but these
electrical and chemical events organized in a special way to give rise to
self-conscious awareness--an "emergent phenomenon" that supposedly originates from the
physical activity of the brain. In other words, according to materialistic
science, we are biological robots with limited time to exist, and at the death
of the brain, the "epiphenomenon" that is based on it called consciousness or
the mind, vanishes and disappears from existence. We are no longer anything
except a memory in the minds of those who knew us--and this is of course just their
memory, not the actual continuation of our existence.
Atheism is the tendency to develop multiple arguments to
prove that God does not exist. Typically an atheist believes these arguments to
be rational, but they are not -- if dualism is correct. It might be a useful exercise for you to pinpoint
the rational flaws in the arguments of many atheists. I typed "if there is a God" in
the google.com search engine and got thousands of sites by people who put a lot
of energy developing arguments against the existence or perfection or goodness
of God (see for example this Web site:
www.vexen.co.uk/religion/rm.html )
It is an important fact to consider that
the majority of scientists in this country belong to a religion and attend some
church.
This segregation of thinking areas in the mind between one's
religious beliefs and one's scientific premises, is often associated with
the politics of "separation of Church and State." Materialistic scientists who have
declared their belief in God (like Newton, Darwin, Einstein, William James,
Jung, Carl Rogers, and many others),
nevertheless do not include God in their scientific research or theory building,
which remains strictly and solely materialistic or physicalistic.
Carl Rogers and Gustav Jung have described themselves as having a religion but they
do not bring God into
their scientific theories about human behavior. The only major exception is Emanuel Swedenborg
(1688-1772) who wrote a book called Rational Psychology in 1742, in which
he makes God and God's revelations, part of his overall theory of human
behavior. A few years later Swedenborg published his 12-volume work titled
Arcana Coelestia (Heavenly Secrets), in which he gives many new
observational facts about
the mind, its structure, its development, and its immortality in heaven or hell.
The resistance or prohibition in science
to use Divine scientific revelations as a source of knowledge about reality, is
an unsupportable bias in science, if indeed
God exists and makes scientific revelations.
In contrast,
theistic psychology assumes that God is the source of all reality and the
real cause of all events in the world today, in the past, and in the future.
Since God's purpose for creating and running the universe is a Human purpose
involving love,
and since God uses rational methods of managing the universe, it makes sense to
discover what these Divine rational laws are and to make use of them in
practical daily applications to further our human potential.
Theistic psychology will enhance natural science
if indeed all natural events have a spiritual cause. By knowing the spiritual cause of natural events we can
control our environment better, both physical and mental. This is especially
important if there is an afterlife and the quality of life there depends on the
mind we form with our choices while we are in this life. This book will summarize many of the facts and
proofs given by Swedenborg that God exists as the Divine Human, that we are born
immortal, and that our life in heaven or hell in the afterlife, depends on the
habits of choices we accumulate in this life. To reveal these things to people
on earth is the purpose of God's communications with humankind in the form of
Sacred Scripture. This communication is the basis of human rationality and
freedom. Without Divine revelations about these things, humans make up their own
materialistic ideas of them in the form of false belief systems, persuasive
faiths, delusional perceptions, or irrational ways of thinking. The only source
of true rationality about God and the afterlife is Divine revelation.
It has been known throughout the ages that
people get inspired and are able to think more excellent thoughts and insights
during these moments of inspiration. We are familiar from history with the
character of the Muses who inspired ancient Greek artists, musicians, and
philosophers. Swedenborg was told by Aristotle, whom he interviewed in the
spiritual world, that a muse would appear to him in the form of a blue flame
while he was writing, guiding him in his thought processes. The concept of the
vertical community in theistic psychology (see Section xx) shows that the
thoughts of every individual on earth are inspired by spirit subjects or
societies to who God connects us and reconnects us moment by moment to assist us
in the continuity and coherence of our thinking process moment by moment while
awake, and then at night while asleep and dreaming. Without the influx into our
mind from the spirits that surround us, we could not have a single thought. Our
mind would be isolated and as if frozen like a statute.
Inspiration is a mutual mental influencing
process. It is part of the orderly mechanisms that God uses to manage every
detail in the universe.
Quoting from the Writings
Sacred Scripture:
CL 415. I shall add here
the following account of an experience.
One morning on waking from sleep, I was meditating in the light of a fine dawn
before being fully awake, when I saw through the window what looked like a
flash of lightning, and soon afterwards heard what sounded like a peal of
thunder. I wondered where it had come from, and heard these words from heaven:
'There are some near you who are engaged in a furious dispute about God and
nature. The flash of light like lightning and the roaring in the air like
thunder are correspondences, which present the appearance of a battle and a
clash of arguments, with one side speaking in favour of God, the other of
nature.'
This spiritual battle had started like this. There were some satans in hell
who said to one another, 'If only we were allowed to talk to angels in heaven,
we should prove to them fully and completely that what they call God, the
source of everything, is nature, and God is nor more than an expression,
unless we mean by it nature.' Since those satans deeply and whole-heartedly
believed that, and were so keen to talk with the angels in heaven, they were
permitted to climb out of the mud and darkness of hell, and talk with two
angels who came down from heaven. They met in the world of spirits which lies
midway between heaven and hell.
[2] The satans on seeing the angels rushed up to them, and shouted in a
furious tone, 'Are you the angels from heaven with whom we can meet to debate
God and nature? You call yourselves wise because you acknowledge God, but oh
how simple you are! Who has ever seen God? Who understands what God is? Who
can comprehend that God rules, and can control the universe and all its parts?
Does anyone but the common people and the crowd acknowledge what they cannot
see and understand? What is more obvious than that nature is the all in all?
What else has the eye seen but nature? What else has the ear heard? What else
has the nose smelt? What else has the tongue tasted? What else has anyone felt
by the touch of his hand or body? Are not our bodily senses our only factual
witnesses? It is on their evidence that anyone can swear that a thing is so.
Are not your heads in nature? What do the thoughts in our heads come from but
from that influence? Take away nature and you cannot think at all.' Much more
was said of the same sort.
[3] On hearing this the angels replied, 'You talk like that because you are
wholly under the influence of the senses. All in the hells have their mental
ideas so sunk in the bodily senses that they cannot lift their minds above
that level. So we forgive you. A life of evil leading to a belief in falsity
has so shut off the inner levels of your minds that it is impossible for them
to be lifted above the sensual level, except in a state where you are distant
from the evils of your lives and your false beliefs. For a satan can
understand truth just as well as an angel when he hears it, but he does not
retain it, because evil obliterates truth and substitutes falsity. But we
observe that you are now in that distanced state, so that you can understand
the truth we are telling you. So pay attention to what we are about to say.
'You lived,' they said, 'in the natural world and there you died, and you are
now in the spiritual world. Did you know anything before about life after
death? Surely you denied its existence and put yourselves on a level with
animals. Did you know anything before about heaven and hell, or about light
and heat in this world? Or the fact that you are no longer within nature, but
above it? For this world and everything in it are spiritual, and the spiritual
is so far above the natural that nature cannot exert the slightest influence
on this world. But you, because you believed that nature was a god or a
goddess, still believe that the light and heat of this world are identical
with the light and heat of the natural world. They are not in the slightest,
for natural light is here darkness, and natural heat here is cold. Did you
know anything about the sun of this world, the source of our light and heat?
Did you know that this sun is undiluted love and the sun of the natural world
is undiluted fire? That the sun of the world, being undiluted fire, is the
source from which nature came into and continues in being? So nature, which
you make into a god or a goddess, is completely lifeless.
[4] 'You can, if given protection, come up with us into heaven; and we can, if
given protection, go down with you into hell. In heaven you will see
magnificent and splendid sights, in hell foul and filthy ones. The reason for
the difference is that in heaven all worship God, in the hells all worship
nature. Those magnificent and splendid sights in the heavens are the
correspondences of the affections for good and truth; but the foul and filthy
sights in hell are the correspondences of the desires for evil and falsity.
From both these facts you can now form a conclusion whether God or nature is
the all in all.'
To this the satans replied, 'In our present state we can draw the conclusion
from what we have heard that God is the all in all. But when the delight of
evil takes hold of our minds, then we can see nothing but nature.'
[5] The two angels and the two satans were standing on the right not far from
me, so I could see and hear them. Around them I suddenly saw many spirits who
had been distinguished for their learning in the natural world. I was
surprised to see these learned men standing at one moment next to the angels,
at another next to the satans, and applauding the party they stood next to. I
was told that their changes of position were changes in their mental states,
as they favoured one side or the other, for they behave like weathercocks.
'And we will tell you a secret,' they said. 'We looked down to earth to see
those distinguished scholars who had used their own judgment to think about
God and nature, and we found six hundred out of a thousand on the side of
nature, and the rest on the side of God. But we found them to be on the side
of God, not because of any understanding, but because, relying on having been
told that nature comes from God, they had often said so. Keeping on saying a
thing from memory or recall, while not at the same time prompted by thought
and intelligence, produces an appearance of belief.'
[6] After this the satans were given protection and went up with the two
angels into heaven, and saw magnificent and splendid sights. On being
enlightened by the light of heaven they there acknowledged that there is a
God, and that nature was created to minister to life, which is in God and
comes from Him; and that nature is in itself lifeless, and so does nothing of
itself, but is acted upon by life. When they had seen these sights and
experienced these perceptions, they went down; and as they came down, their
love of evil returned and shut off their intellect above, opening it
underneath. Then there appeared above what looked like a covering flashing
with hellish fire. The moment their feet touched the earth, the ground yawned
beneath them, and they sank back down to their own kind. (CL 415)
A current illustration of the negative bias
thinking in science and popular science discussions, is the bestseller
titled The God Delusion by a well known scientist in England, Richard
Dawkins. Here are some selections from the popularizing online Wikipedia
entry for this book. While reading it, keep in mind that 85 percent of Americans
believe in God, the afterlife, and heaven. Hawkins is therefore saying that 85
percent of Americans are delusional! Also note carefully that since he does not
prove his point, and he can never do so, his entire argument is based on a bias.
But since he denies that it could be a bias, he engages in level 1
thinking and reasoning to try to argue that he is right and others are
delusional.
[My comments are inserted in italics and
square brackets.]
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_God_Delusion
"In the book, Dawkins argues that belief in a
supernatural creator qualifies as a delusion, which he defines as a persistent
false belief held in the face of strong contradictory evidence. He is
sympathetic to Robert Pirsig's observation that "when one person suffers from
a delusion it is called insanity. When many people suffer from a delusion it
is called religion."
[Note that the two best known psychologists
of the twentieth century -- Sigmund Freud and B. F. Skinner -- also made
similar points. This negative bias is entrenched also in science education
today so that teachers in high school science courses don't tell their
students that the anti-God stance of science is a negative bias in science,
not a proof. The fact that they don't tell indicates a political attitude in
education that I believe is detrimental to the public good. Now that the
positive bias in science exists, there may be a change in this uncritical
anti-God orientation.]
[But note this also:
The negative bias in public school science courses in the U.S. can be
understood in terms of the long standing group practice in the history of
this nation to separate religion from state. This explains why the court
systems have struck down local laws that require biology teachers to teach
the creation story in Genesis (Old Testament). But in theistic psychology we
discuss God as a scientific concept, and we gather evidence from the
correspondential sense of Sacred Scripture. Since religion is based only on
the literal sense of Sacred Scripture, and not on the correspondential
sense, it is now possible therefore to discuss God in Science independently
of religion. This was not possible before theistic psychology. But
now it is! See also Section xx for more discussion on this.]
Continuing with the Wikipedia entry:
"Dawkins writes that The God Delusion
contains four "consciousness-raising" messages:
-
Atheists can be happy, balanced, moral,
and intellectually fulfilled.
-
Natural selection and
similar scientific theories are superior to a "God hypothesis" — the
illusion of
intelligent design —
in explaining the living world and the cosmos.
-
Children should not be labeled by their
parents' religion. Terms like "Catholic child" or "Muslim child"
should make people flinch.
-
Atheists should be proud, not
apologetic, because atheism is evidence of a healthy, independent
mind.[1]
"
[Commenting on the above: According to theistic
psychology the characteristics mentioned here under (1) are part of the
character of our inherited natural mind (see Section xx). The distinction
atheist attitudes vs. religious attitudes is not inborn or inherited from
parents. People who have a religion vs. people who deny God are equally
capable of developing their natural mind and all its characteristics. However
because atheism and morality are not opposed, which is correct, it does not
follow that therefore God does not exist. This is an illogical conclusion.
Regarding point (2), it is not relevant to the "God as a scientific concept"
issue whether the science in natural selection theory is superior to the
science in intelligent design theory. Neither of these two are relevant to the
issue of God in science since both are based on the literal sense of the
Bible, and not at all on the correspondential sense. Hence Dawkins is clearly
wrong in concluding that the "God hypothesis" is inferior scientifically to
the natural selection hypothesis.
Regarding point (3), it is a matter of culture
and socialization, not science. Certainly Dawkins is wrong if he argues
that this is a scientific decision rather than cultural, political, and
religious.
Regarding point (4), it is a
prescription, not a proven point. This is his belief or blind faith in
atheism. What if he is wrong? We know from theistic psychology that he is
wrong regarding the denial of the mental world of eternity. So the question
becomes: What effect does atheism have upon a person's life in eternity? This
is discussed in theistic psychology in many places since it is central to the
purpose of studying theistic psychology (see Section xx).
Back to the Wikipedia article on The God
Delusion by Dawkins:
"The God hypothesis"
"Dawkins begins Chapter 2 by describing
Yahweh, the God of the
Old Testament, as
"arguably the most unpleasant character in all fiction. Jealous and
proud of it, a petty, unjust, unforgiving control freak, a vindictive
bloodthirsty ethnic cleanser, a misogynistic, homophobic, racist,
infanticidal, genocidical, filicidal, pestilential, megalomaniacal,
sadomasochistic, capriciously malevolent bully."[10]
[Others have also made this observation
about the literal sense of the Old Testament Sacred Scripture. Although this
description is exaggerated and vindictive, it does contain some accuracy
regarding how God is portrayed in many passages (see Section xx). It is also
imbalanced, because other passages present God as loving, forgiving, just,
compassionate, all knowing, and omnipresent. The description by Dawkins is
certainly biased, as stated, because it imputes without proof evil
intentions to God, as if to suggest that God can be good, but He is also
evil, as portrayed in the Old Testament Bible. This imputation of God's
intentions and character is certainly illogical and unfounded.
But theistic psychology needs to
explain why God appears in some passages to be angry, vengeful, or regretful
of what he had done, or why God orders the massacre of women, children, and
cattle in some wars. When we look at the correspondential sense of what God
says in Sacred Scripture, we never find anything that God says that is not
good, loving, compassionate, omnipotent, omniscient, and always involved in
helping and supporting every human being from birth to endless eternity (see
Section xx).]
Continuing with the article:
"Hence the inability to disprove the
existence of God provides no positive reason to believe. Rather, Dawkins
argues that the burden of proof is on the advocates of the existence of God."
[Note his realization of "the inability
to disprove the existence of God". Dawkins knows that he is thinking within
the negative bias mode of science. He realizes it is a bias. Unfortunately,
science teachers in public schools do not do the same. They do not admit to
the students that the denial of God is unproven in science. All they say is
that God is not scientific. They have lo logical or rational warrant to say
this to students. No doubt they themselves may believe it out of confusion.
They would be able to change their teaching if they were informed by the
science textbook writers from which they learn, that the denial of God in
science is not proven, and therefore it is a negative bias in science.
Note also that Dawkins says that those
who believe that God is a reality should prove the existence of God. This is
illogical and unfair since he already admits that denying God's existence
cannot be proven. So it follows that for the same reason, proving that Go
exists is also not possible. Hence it is called the positive bias in
science. Either way it is a bias and cannot be proven. It is illogical and
unfair for him to require that the positive bias be proven rather than
accepted as a bias -- and then it is examined for evidence, as we do in
theistic psychology.]
Continuing with the article:
"In chapter 6, Dawkins turns his attention
to the subject of
morality, arguing that we do not need religion in order to be
good. Instead, he maintains that our morality has a Darwinian
explanation: altruistic genes have been selected through the process
of our evolution, and we possess a natural empathy."
[Note that Dawkins is ignorant of
mental anatomy (see Section xx) which shows that we are born with a
natural-rational mind and a spiritual-rational mind. The natural
mind serves us in this life, while the spiritual mind serves us in
the afterlife of eternity. Morality in the natural mind ("altruistic
genes") is possible even if the spiritual mind is denied (see
Section xx). But being spiritually good is not possible if the
spiritual mind is denied. People can be naturally good or moral, yet
be spiritually insane and evil. After resuscitation in the afterlife
of eternity we live in our spiritual mind, not the natural mind.
People who are naturally good or moral in the natural mind, may be
insane and evil in the spiritual mind, and in that case they select
a hellish life for themselves, while people who are spiritually sane
and good, select a heavenly life for themselves in eternity (see
Section xx).
This raises again the important issue
whether denial of God and natural morality is sufficient to develop
a character that chooses heaven in eternity. Theistic psychology
shows why this is not sufficient, and that it is necessary to have a
theistic orientation in this life in order to develop our spiritual
mind so that it is heavenly rather hellish when we are resuscitated
in eternity (see Section xx).]
Continuing with the article:
"Dawkins turns to the question of why he
feels so hostile towards religion in Chapter 8, arguing with examples
that religion subverts science, fosters
fanaticism, encourages
bigotry towards
homosexuals, and
influences society in other negative ways. Dawkins states that
Southern preachers used the
Bible to justify
slavery by claiming Africans were descendants of
Abraham's sinful son.
During the
Crusades, "pagans" and
"heretics" who would not convert to Christianity were murdered, and
there are other similar examples."
[Note that these criticisms of
religion have been voiced by many in literature and Dawkins is
repeating them in his book. However they are all false because they
are based, not on God and what God says in reality, but on the
literal sense, which is adapted to the culture and its prejudices.
Sacred Scripture would have been rejected by people if the literal
sense were not expressive of how they think and what they are
willing to accept (see Section xx). Also, it is illogical to
attribute wars (like the Crusades, etc.) to God or to religion when
clearly these wars were waged because of political ambitions and
prejudices of kings and bishops. The wars and conflicts were not
based on God or Sacred Scripture. In fact until the twentieth
century the vast majority of people did not read Sacred Scripture.
But it is rational, logical, and scientific to separate these two:
God and Sacred Scripture on the one hand, and religion, culture, and
politics on the other. As theistic psychology proves, the
correspondential sense of all Sacred Scripture is universal, culture
free, and scientific.]
Check the original article for more
discussion from the perspective of people who share the negative bias mode of
thinking. Also check out this review of the book that disagrees with Dawkins,
but on wholly different grounds than I do above.:
http://www.christianitytoday.com/bc/2007/002/1.21.html
1.1.2
Level 2: Mystical Religion
Religions are "mystical" in the sense that they do not give a rational and
scientific explanation of God and the universe. Instead they give a creed that
must be accepted as a belief system or faith which specifies who God is and what
He demands from the members of that religion. Those faithful who live according to
the doctrine of their religion are rewarded by God and receive eternal happiness in life after death.
But those who do not live according to their doctrine, and all those who live
according to a false faith, are punished and relegated to eternal misery in
their life after death. Some faiths include the idea that this punishment is not
eternal since people can change from bad to good following their phase of
punishment in the afterlife. Some religions include the idea that this
punishment takes place by being reincarnated in the natural world until the individual
attains freedom from illusion and becomes divine.
Level 2 thinking is above level 1 thinking
in rationality, if the assumption that there is God is true. In that case Level 2 thinking is
a better representation of reality, more valid, more powerful, more useful, and
more practical than non-theistic science is about the subject of God and how best
to prepare for the afterlife. Materialistic science thinking (level 1) cannot help us
at all in terms of preparing ourselves for the afterlife. This is a huge
disadvantage since it's extremely important and urgent that we prepare ourselves
adequately for the afterlife -- if there is such a thing. This is totally obvious if you consider it from
theistic psychology which describes the life after death as either eternal
happiness and sanity or eternal misery and delusion. Which it is depends on
our preparation. Hence religion is a more rational and effective method of
psychological preparation than non-theistic psychology. Clearly, from a practical
point of view, it is important that we get this issue right, and that we remember
what's at stake if we are right or wrong about God and the afterlife.
But mystical religion is not yet a fully rational and scientific perspective on God. One proof of this is that there
are various religions and they not only contradict each other but sometimes want to
annihilate each other. Even when they are peaceful to one another, some of them
still believe that all others are false and lead their believers to eternal
unhappiness in the afterlife. Obviously, if the religions were fully rational,
they could not disagree with each other in such a drastic way. Rationality is
the process of unifying diverse things into a coherent whole. Genuine rational
faith unifies all varieties of doctrine into one overall doctrine that agrees
with genuine truth and can live with genuine good. The purpose of all rational
faiths (or religions) is to lead people to the good of heaven in the afterlife,
and this always requires a change of character and a new way of making our daily
choices. This is the truth of all religions that are based on genuine rational
faith obtained from Sacred Scripture. Rational faith always leads to love and
peace, for hostility and scorn cannot be associated with rational spirituality.
Rational spirituality is the only genuine spirituality. It is based on Divine
Speech or Divine Truth transmitted through Sacred Scripture (see Sections xx).
But faith that is not based on rational
spirituality does not put love and peace ahead of doctrinal differences. Such
persuasive faiths are exclusive and hostile to one another. A notable contrast to this pattern of religion
is the New Church which has been based on the Writings of Swedenborg (see
Reading List). They
acknowledge the idea from the Writings of Swedenborg that God accepts all
religions and that eternal happiness (or "heaven") is not denied to anyone who
is capable of living a heavenly life, which means capable of having altruistic feelings in the afterlife as the basis of
their inner character. This inner
character is what we form for ourselves by the way we live on earth through the
thousands of choices we make every day. The immortal
"spiritual body" we have in the afterlife is nothing else than the character we
have formed with our life in the natural world. In the spiritual world, which is
a mental or rational world, feelings and thoughts create what is around us, as
will be explained (see Section xx).
Theistic psychology teaches people the skills they need to
rebuild their character into heavenly traits with which they can have a life in
heaven (see Section xx). Clearly this is of incalculable benefit to every person.
Theistic psychology assumes that there is an absolute
universal standard for all human character regardless of planet, religion,
culture, or personality. This is a necessary assumption since it defines good vs.
evil and truth vs. falsity in terms of scientific
revelations from God. Rationally, there can be only one God since God is
infinite and two infinites are impossible. Since God is absolute truth and the sole source of all truth, there
is an absolute standard for the human race regardless of origin or time. This
absolute truth or reality is communicated to humans in two ways--externally by
means of scientific revelations given by God to a particular prophet or
revelator, and second, by inner voice of one's conscience by which God
influences and guides the rational conscious decisions of every person, whether one denies God or not
(See Section 7.0.4.1).
When we deny God, we still possess a moral conscience which guides our life
decisions and keeps us human. God secretly (or unconsciously) maintains the
operation of moral conscience in individuals regardless of their stated belief
systems.
A student reacting to some of the ideas in this book wrote:
"One statement that I disagreed with was “ Taylor says if a
person or church does not understand the true god properly than all doctrine,
dogma and ritual are possibly invalid.” I disagree with Taylor because I don’t
understand the true God and I don’t think anyone ever could really understand
him truly. Taylor believes “that God appears as “mysterious” to people and
therefore god cannot truly be a part of the mind if He is not understood.” I
think God is always present whether we understand him or not and mysterious is a
part of our misunderstanding of God that makes him great. One of the statements
that I agree with is when Elisabeth disagrees “I think there will always be
mystery with God, because we have a finite mind while God has an infinite mind.”
I agree with this totally I think God is beyond our comprehension."
A common idea is voiced here, namely that since God is infinite,
He is incomprehensible. Therefore God and mystery are inseparable. However, Swedenborg
points out two aspects of God, the one that we relate to consciously and the one that we
are not conscious of. We do not ever relate in any way to God's infinity and immensity. For instance
God's essence is infinite Divine Love and Truth. We cannot relate to that for it
is incomprehensible. But God has created human beings with rational minds that
can relate to God's ability to limit His rationality by means of correspondences
to His infinite reality. Therefore we can know and understand God by His
love and intelligence which exist in our mind as-if our own love and
intelligence (see Section xx). In other words, God has created human beings to
be able to receive correspondential versions of His infinite Love and
Intelligence. These correspondential versions feel like they are our own, and it
is this ownership upon which is based our immortality. It is God's love and
intelligence in us as-if our own, that makes us immortal. If we didn't feel that
they are our own, we could not have a mind that lives forever. Animals cannot
feel that the instinct and capacities they experience are as-if their own. This
requires rational thinking ability. Therefore animals cannot be immortal, though
Swedenborg has seen animals in the spiritual world (but these are not the
animals from earth -- see Section xx).
We can have conscious
communication and interaction with God as the Divine-Human through the love and truth
that issue from Him, enter our mind, and operate there as-if they were our own
love and intelligence. Love and truth in our mind are the basic spiritual
substances that activate the operations of the
mind and form its content, meaning, and consciousness. If God were to remove the
feeling that His love and intelligence streaming into our mind are as-if our
own, we would instantly cease to think, to reason, to plan, to intend, or to
desire and want anything. We would no longer be human beings.
We are immortal by the fact that we can be adjoined to God through
His love and truth entering our
mind and operating there as-if it were our own love and truth. Nothing else but
the spiritual substances of love and truth can make us human. The essence of
being human is doing
things we want to (=love) by planning and understanding rationally (=truth).
Animals are neither immortal nor human because, though they have love and the
ability to do things they want, they are not capable of pursuing their loves by
planning and understanding rationally (=truth). This is why humans are
responsible for their choices while animals are not -- they just follow their
innate instincts or biologically-based tendencies. Only when love is combined
with truth can humanity begin. And since love and truth are eternal, uncreate,
immortal substances of God, humans become immortal when they can appropriate
these immortal substances to be God's love and truth in them as-if their own, and make them the substances
out of which the organ of their mind is constructed. This is the scientific
psycho-biological explanation of our immortality (see Section xx).
We also have the ability to reject and distort the love and truth that enter the
mind. In that case we cut off conscious communication with God and give up higher ways
of thinking for the sake of materialism. Note carefully that God is equally in every individual
regardless
of the individual's religion or belief system. But there is a significant
difference between the mental states in which we reject God and the mental
states in which we acknowledge and honor God. When we acknowledge God's management involvement
with every event in our mind and life, we are elevated in the level of our conscious
operations in relation to God. In that state of conscious elevation (or
"enlightenment"), God reveals meanings and understandings to us internally. The
higher meaning or truth seems to just pop into our consciousness when we
approach daily tasks with constant acknowledgement of God's active presence and
co-participation. The more we are conscious of God's actual co-participation in
every second of life, the more our consciousness is elevated, the more we can
act rationally and lovingly with truth. Science would improve, society would
improve, the environment would improve, in short, all that is human would
improve and become of a higher quality.
This higher meaning and rational understanding of God, and how
God manages us and the universe, is not available to our mind in states of denial
of God or states of forgetting of God in the doing of daily tasks. In these two
states of "God ignorance" we are not capable of accepting the idea of God
rationally.
Progress in our spiritual development is tremendously
enhanced when we make a serious effort to consider God's presence in all our
actions all day long every day. By studying theistic psychology we can develop
our rational understanding and explanations of how God co-participates in every
thought, feeling, action, or seemingly chance event. This requires that we
understand God's goals and management techniques. God has revealed them in the
Writings of Swedenborg. If we maintain the positive bias in science, we will be able to
investigate Swedenborg's arguments and proofs. If we stay with the negative
bias in science, we cannot rationally examine his evidence--we can only reject it in
advance.
Another student wrote:
"Question 2: Make up a gain-loss sheet that
lists and briefly explains what you could gain or loose by adopting the
negative vs. positive bias in science regarding God’s existence as a scientific reality.
Answer 2: (...) Gains and Loses
In the Negative bias in science a gain that I thought of is
that one can have a strong appreciation and knowledge of the natural laws of
science, namely biology, chemistry, physics, and psychology. One would have a
firm grasp of this information because they do not believe in God or that He
had any part in the creation of the universe or mankind. They would believe in
Newton’s Laws and so forth concerning energy, and the chemical make up of all
other organic compounds. Nothing in their belief systems consists of objects
or ideas that cannot be scientifically tested, retested, observed by all and
falling outside of these tested laws. (...)
On the other hand there are also loses when one
takes on the positive bias in science and it is basically that they loose the negative
bias in science. They may lose respect for the natural laws of sciences since they
believe that God is what created and controls the universe and not these
natural laws."
Actually, we need to
avoid thinking that the positive bias in science involves attributing less
importance to natural laws than the negative bias in science.
Instead, the positive bias
thinking is that God manages every detail of the natural world through
omnipotence and rational management techniques called Divine Laws of Providence
and Permissions (see Section xx). The negative bias in science is that these laws operate
on their own. The positive bias in science is that these laws are the means or the method
by which God manages the natural world. They could not work on their own. Take
for example the force of gravity. A force needs a continuous source. What is the
source that keeps gravity force going? It is God's omnipotence applied through
the substances of the Spiritual Sun (see Section xx).

Consider the diagram above.
The positive bias in science conceptualizes all physical phenomena in the
natural world as being effects, while their causes lie in the spiritual world of
eternity, that is the mental world (see Section xx). This is because the world
to time-space is created in perfect functional correspondence with the world of
eternity that is not in time-space. Before time-space phenomena can come into
existence there must be a spiritual stimulus that causes the natural event. This
is because God creates and manages the two worlds to be functionally
interconnected, and not independent. In terms of successive order of creation,
Divine Speech as spiritual light and heat from the Spiritual Sun enters the
mental world in successive layers, the lowest of which is the corporeal mind.
Anatomically this organ is constructed to be an organic interface with physical
stimuli and mental awareness of them (see Section xx). From the corporeal mind
there is a discrete jump to the physical body and world of time-space.
As you can see, Divine
Speech exits the Spiritual Sun, enters the mental world, goes through the layers
of created existence, and exits or rests in the phenomena of time-space (see
charts in Section xx). This perspective is shown in the above diagram by
representing the mental world of eternity as cause (arrow), which is a discrete
degree within or above, the natural world of time-space. The negative bias
science is shown as containing cause-effect relations at the same level. That
is, both causes and effects are considered physical phenomena in
time-space-matter.
The two diagrams side by
side indicate that every single physical phenomenon that negative bias
scientists study is of equal relevance and importance to positive bias
scientists. It's not the case that the positive bias scientists study
religion or the mind, while negative bias scientists study nature.
Rather, positive bias
science is a new scientific paradigm for all science. It is just a continuation
and evolution of science itself. It is a new paradigm that requires new
explanations and theoretical accounts for all the physical phenomena known, and
those still to be discovered.
The positive bias in
science does not mean believing in God and having a religious membership.
The positive bias in science does not mean religion, faith, belief,
philosophy. The positive bias in science is a new paradigm in science for
viewing and explaining in a different way all the current data and knowledge in
physics, mathematics, psychology, biology, neurophysiology, engineering,
computer science, business, law, forensics, metallurgy, art, dance, music, etc.
The positive bias in science affects not only the sciences but also the arts and
humanities (see Section xx).
1.1.3
Level 3:
Theistic Psychology
According to the
positive bias
of theistic psychology, scientific revelations have been given by God in the
Writings of Swedenborg (1688-1772) and these revelations make up the basic
assumptions and premises for theistic psychology.
Without these scientific
revelations it would be impossible to have access to these details about God's
management methods, since they cannot be discovered in any other way. Whatever
other authors have written in the past, necessarily represents their guesses or
visions, which remain limited. By definition it is impossible for any of them to
see beyond the human level. But scientific revelations are Divine and come from
the level of the Divine Omniscience. They make accessible to science a database
of knowledge about God and the afterlife that can never be discovered or
invented by humans living in the natural world. Further, they reveal new
principles that explain how scientific laws actually work by means of the
"science of correspondences" (see Section xx).
These scientific revelations are
not like prior revelations which were at the level of mystical thinking and
understanding rather than modern scientific. The Writings Sacred Scripture
contain a comprehensive, global, and integrated account of how God manages the
physical world through the laws of spiritual correspondences (see Section
xx).
The details of the
revelations were not dictated to
Swedenborg while he was in a trance or asleep or by having a vision. Instead, Swedenborg was given the
unique capacity to be conscious simultaneously in the natural and the spiritual
worlds, and thereby empirically observe and confirm the cause-effect action of
correspondences. For 27 years on a daily basis he accessed the spiritual world mentally
and kept daily notes that comprise his data, his observations, his experiences,
his experiments, and his explanations. He therefore was able to compile a unique
record of how the spiritual and natural worlds interact and depend on each
other through the cause-effect action of correspondences.
Swedenborg discovered, confirmed, and proved that the spiritual world of the
afterlife called eternity, is the mental world of each individual.
Amazingly, the mental world of
all human beings overlaps with each other so that the entire human race
congregates after death in this spiritual-mental environment. This was the first
time in the history of science that a scientist was given the tools for the
direct observation of the spiritual world of eternity.
Swedenborg was able to interview those who
had lived on earth thousands of years ago, and are now living in their heaven or hell.
He was also able to interview people he knew in his native Sweden who had died
but recently. He was a reputed scientist who had suddenly come into possession
of a new observation platform of the human mind. He could see and talk to the
people who were undergoing the process of "resuscitation," which is the
switching over from the physical body to the spiritual body at "death." This
process takes approximately 30 hours (see
Section 1.7). He conducted
controlled observations and experiments and reported what he saw and heard in
the spiritual world (see
these
examples in Volume 18 -- Selections Keyed to Subjects, entry on
[EXPERIMENTS]).
He had rational conversations and exchanges with those who
inhabit the afterlife. He described their language, their thinking, their
lifestyle. His rational and scientific explanations of these events are
therefore to be read as science. He proved in several ways that
there is a correspondential relationship between every sentence and word in
Sacred Scripture and an ongoing activity in the spiritual world of eternity that
he could observe. Further, all the people in the world of the afterlife could
also see these relationships. Everyone one of us will be able to confirm these
relationships as soon as we undergo resuscitation after death of the physical
body.
This book examines whether
God and Divine scientific revelations, can have a scientific role in
the scientific explanations of human behavior, without invalidating psychology as a
behavioral science.
We
will consider the entire spectrum of human behavior, from birth to the life
after death in immortality. We will also consider how the spiritual world and the natural world
are interlocked by rational laws of correspondence so that the laws of feeling,
thinking and acting cannot be explained without recourse to what is happening in
the spiritual world simultaneously while we are acting and behaving in this
world through our physical body.
The spiritual and natural
worlds are connected so that
we are born dual citizens -- the physical body and brain are in the natural
world while the organ of the mind (or "mental body") is in the spiritual world.
The two are locked into
functional correspondence--what one of them does determines what the other does
according to specified laws of correspondences.
These laws of correspondence
are used in theistic psychology to do research about the inner mind that is
within the spiritual or mental body. The inner mind of every individual is unconsciously
in constant contact with the minds of individuals who are already in the afterlife. In
this way there is a continuous network of interaction between all individuals of
the human race, past and present. I refer to this universal
interaction network as the "vertical community" (see Section xx). The methods and procedures of
this interaction process are described in the Writings Sacred Scripture. As a
result, a tremendously useful new database of scientific knowledge is now
available to the human race.
Here is a
physicist's article in the mode of the positive bias science. Dr. Thompson has
written a number of articles on theistic psychology topics, but from the
perspective of a nuclear physicist who is currently (2007) still very much
engaged in government funded research. Yet he sees how the Swedenborg Reports
present new scientific concepts that can help physics move into still deeper
topics and explanations of reality.
From:
http://www.newdualism.org/papers/I.Thompson/pldi.html
The Consistency Of Physical Law With
Divine ImmanenceIan Thompson
Published in: Science & Christian Belief, 5 (1993)
pp.19-36
Abstract:
A model is presented to show how the existence of physical law could
be a reasonable consequence of Divine Immanence in the world of
natural phenomena. Divine Immanence is seen as the continual
production of the principal causes or dispositions which enable
created things to act and change. It is argued that this model is
physically consistent, philosophically coherent, and theologically
sound.
Selections from the article:
Divine Dispositional Immanence
For these reasons I wish in this paper to restate an old idea, one
that has been only occasionally taken up[8],
and expand it using a modern philosophy of dispositions. This idea is
a simple scheme for the relation of Divine and natural powers, and
suggests how physical laws might be not only compatible with Divine
Immanence in nature, but also a consequence of Immanence. The thesis I
wish to defend may be called the hypothesis of `Divine Dispositional
Immanence' (DDI for short), and is :
DDI: The dispositions of an object are those derivatives of
Divine Power that accord with what is actual about that object.
Here, `actuality' is defined as that which is not constituted
by capacities, potentialities and/or dispositions of any kind. Exactly
what is actual about a natural object depends on a detailed
physics, and will be different according to Newtonian and quantum
mechanics (see ref. [9]). Which actualities
then correspond to which dispositions is a subject for further
investigation, as is whether this is a strict one-to-one
correspondence.
To explain what the DDI thesis means, consider two analogies. God
provides life as the sun shines on the earth. The sun shining on the
earth is constant, but the energy received by the earth varies by days
and seasons. We know, however, that this variation is according to the
earth's distance and orientation: according to something actual about
the earth, not because of variations in the sun. A second analogy is
that God provides life as we are provided with food. Consider the way
animals consume food in order to live. What an animal is capable of
doing after eating depends on its digestive system and how it has
assimilated the food. Different species will respond quite differently
to the same food, according to how they are constituted. (These
analogies are discussed further in section 2.5.)
If on first sight the hypothesis seems too far-fetched or
implausible, remember that it is designed to reproduce just those
kinds of effects we usually see in the world around us. Remember too
that I have not specified what in fact is `actual', so strictly
speaking the thesis has `materialistic', `dualistic' and `idealistic'
versions, depending on whether only matter is actual, or both matter
and mind, or mind only. Thus, the DDI thesis defines a general
framework in which these theories of nature can be discussed within a
theistic context. One consequence of Immanence should be to make all
things (mind and/or matter) behave as if they were active from
themselves, as that is the way they appear to us. We might rightly be
wary of a God with absolute and arbitrary power to act under any
pretext whatsoever: the precise content of the DDI thesis is that, on
the contrary, God acts in a reasonable and orderly fashion compatible
with (some kind of) natural regularities.
This paper may be regarded as an exercise in the Theology of
Nature, but of a kind that is hypothetico-deductive, not inductive.
That is, we postulate an explanatory hypothesis such as the DDI
thesis, and follow its consequences to see how well they agree with
what we know already. The hypothesis can only be entertained, however,
if expressed coherently, and considered logically possible. To that
end, section 2 presents philosophical analyses of four constituent
concepts used in the DDI thesis. Only if these ideas are not
incoherent can the DDI thesis be reasonably considered. The thesis
must also be shown to be consistent with physics, as physics is an
existing attempt to relate the actual forms of natural objects to
their dispositions and potentialities.
Finally, the DDI thesis will be considered within the framework of
a theistic theology that might be considered already well established.
Since the DDI thesis is a statement of what God does, and may be a
restriction on arbitrary omnipotence, the thesis will have to be shown
to be theologically reasonable. We should also see if it is preferable
to occasionalism, whereby God is the direct and only cause of
natural events, and to concurrentism, whereby God is a general
cause which must cooperate with pre-existing natural powers. That is,
we must show that the DDI thesis describes what would be done by God
as He is understood in the western tradition, and is not opposed by
other attributes the tradition believes essential to the Divine. The
demonstration will be based on the argument that God, if Life Itself,
cannot create natural beings that both are distinct from Him, and live
from themselves (i.e. that are their own dispositions to act).
What can be done is to provide the life of these beings for
them to live as if from themselves. This is what appears to
happen, although in this paper I will be discussing only natural
dispositions, and not looking at the full range of `life'.
Continued in the original article.
From:
http://www.newdualism.org/papers/I.Thompson/pldi.html
|
|
See also Dr.
Thompson's Web site on the New Dualism in Science:
http://www.newdualism.org/
See also Dr.
Thompson's directory of articles on the Web related to consciousness, dualism,
theism, materialism, mentalism, parapsychology:
http://www.newdualism.org/online-articles.htm
1.1.4
Ten Rational Conclusions Derived From the Proposition
That God Exists
The positive bias science takes an affirmative
position on God's existence, while the negative bias science takes a negative
position on God's existence. It is necessary to put aside the negative bias
in science
in order to examine fairly whether the positive bias in science is viable or not as a
rational scientific methodology.
The positive bias in science begins with the
proposition that God exists. This is a bias, since it cannot be proven as a
conclusion. Similarly, the proposition in negative bias science that "God does
not exist." cannot be proven, and must remain a bias. So, departing with the
positive bias in science that "God exists." what kind of rational propositions follow
logically from this one assumption? Here is an analysis. Try to memorize it
enough so you can duplicate the arguments with your friends. See how far they
are willing to go.
=========
God exists.
=========
This is the starting point. All the rest follows logically
from this one truth.
The American Heritage Dictionary defines God as
A being conceived as the perfect,
omnipotent, omniscient originator and ruler of the universe, the principal
object of faith and worship in monotheistic religions.
(A) First
Conclusion: God is a Person, at once Divine and Human.
Words for God like “being” “perfect” “ruler” indicates that
God is a Person, not an impersonal energy or entity like the universe. It’s a
strange thing to do to pray to the universe! But it’s perfectly logical to pray
to a Person who is the Supreme Being. Because God is a Person, He can be loving
and wise, or, good and rational. It makes rational sense to pray, or to have a
relationship with, a Divine Human Person who is loving and wise to perfection
(see Section xx).
(B) Second
Conclusion: God’s Omnipotence Must Control Every Event
The word omnipotent refers to all power. Try to think of
something that does not involve power. The motion of an atom or a planet
requires power. For you to read this requires power to move your eyes, power to
select thoughts and to sequence them into a logical order, and power to want to
read that sentence. Clearly, God must be a controlling element in your reading
this sentence.
At first we think that God has created the universe with
its own source of power. For instance, once God has created electro-magnetic
forces into a certain physical order, other phenomena then stem from this
physical energy and order, not directly from God. There is a popular lyric that
says “God is watching us” and sometimes we can hear someone ask in anguish
“Where is God now!” Both of these ideas in our mind are consequences of the
illogical background assumption that God can give away some of his power to
nature or to people who are supposed to think and make decisions on their own.
But logic requires us to say that God’s power cannot be
given away to nature or to people because once this is done, God is no longer
omnipotent. And that’s not possible or logical. God is omnipotent necessarily
means that none of God’s power can be given away, no matter how tiny. If even
the tiniest power were given away by God, He would no longer be omnipotent.
(C) Third Conclusion: God is Perfect in
Love and Rationality
Omnipotence, omniscience, omnipresence, and perfection
means that God is perfectly and totally loving and wise. There cannot be an
exception, not even one, for then God would not be perfectly loving. There
cannot be a mistake because then God would not be perfectly wise and omniscient.
At first we think that God may be perfect but He does not
have perfect control over what happens because He gives people freedom to decide
as part of what it means to be human. This is an illogical idea because God’s
omnipotence means He controls everything, including people’s decisions. Hence,
we need to create a rational explanation for the fact that people make bad
decisions, are selfish, deceitful, and cruel to each other.
Since God is omnipotent, perfectly loving and wise, we can
conclude logically that He must have a rational and good reason for allowing
people to make bad decisions and to be cruel to each other. Why does God allow
this since He can stop it?
Not only can He stop it, but God must be the power behind
each step or detail. A simple example is a DUI driver who kills a mother and her
baby in a head on crash. Logic tells us that since God is omnipotent it was
God’s power that gave the driver the power to lift his hand and ingest the
alcohol to excess, then it was God’s power that gave the two cars energy to
collide, and it was the power of God that took the life of the mother and the
baby. Every molecular detail of the drinking, driving, crashing, and dying was
controlled by God, including the thought processes and decisions of the drunk
driver and the mother.
Since God is perfect in loving and wisdom or rationality,
it is logical to conclude that every feature and detail of the event was good
and wise, or else God could not possibly bring it into existence. Every part of
the event. There cannot logically be an exception. In this case it includes the
drinking, the production of alcohol, bars, cars, mothers driving their babies,
drivers making hundreds of decisions, cars functioning in all their parts, or
malfunctioning. all is included in God’s omnipotence, perfection, love, and
wisdom.
The above sounds logical enough, but it is not satisfying –
not until we can explain rationally how these details are indeed good – innocent
mother and baby being killed, alcohol industry and marketing, dangerous cars,
people making selfish and cruel decisions, etc. We must be able to explain these
details rationally, as the actions of a perfect omnipotent God. If we cannot
explain it rationally, we reject God from the inmost of our mind, and then we
are in deep trouble.
(D) Fourth Conclusion: There are Two
Worlds, One in Time-Space, the Other in Eternity
God the omnipotent Divine Human with perfect love and
wisdom, is the creator of the universe. It is illogical to think that God could
be in the created universe. In order to create physical energy, time, space, and
matter it is logically necessary that God be outside what is created. God could
not create the physical universe if He is part of the universe He creates. It is
rational therefore to conclude that there are two types of existence, or two
types of universes, one outside time and space, and the other in time and space.
This rational principle is called dualism in science.
God has always existed. This conclusion is rational because
if God had not existed, than how did He get into existence? So logic requires
that we think that God has always existed. We need therefore two names for
existence (dualism=two). One type of existence is called eternity and is not in
time and space. The other type of existence is time and space. These two types
are traditionally called natural and spiritual.
Most people are confused about how to define what is
spiritual. Much nonsense has been written and is being taught and believed. But
spiritual is nothing else than the existence of eternity, and natural is the
existence of time-space, also called the physical universe.
The physical universe is created and all things created
must have a beginning in time. But God and anything that belongs to God, is not
created, and therefore does not have a beginning. Everything that belongs to God
as part of God has no beginning and no end in eternity. But all things that God
creates as created thing has a beginning in time and in eternity. This can be
fully understood rationally, and must be, or else our mind will reject it and we
will be in deep trouble.
The universe of created time and space is an outside
covering to the universe of eternity which does not have time and space. To
understand this more clearly, consider how we create objects in our
visualization or dream. If you picture yourself eating in a restaurant right now
you will see in your imagination various objects like tables, chairs, people,
and food, along with sounds, smells, movements, and events. These are objects
created by your imagination in your thinking. They are your thoughts that you
have covered over with physical looking objects. So you can see that the chair
you are sitting on in that imagined restaurant is a thought that is covered over
with an external physical-like shape.
This is exactly how we can understand God from eternity,
being outside time or space, creating and managing events in time and space. God
is omnipresent not in space but apart from space. This is a rational necessity
since God could not be omnipresent in space – logical impossibility. If we think
logical impossibilities about God, we cannot believe He is perfect and
omnipotent. And when we stop thinking that, we are in deep trouble.
Every event in that restaurant you are dreaming up is an
event created by your thinking and imagining. Your thinking and imagining must
be outside your dream, or else you could not create your dream. In the same way,
God creates every detail of events in time-space by covering up His thoughts and
feelings with created things. Every created thing must therefore have both types
of existence – one in time and the other in eternity. A rock or a pencil or the
wind, must therefore have an existence in time-space and one outside of it.
A rock is therefore some idea of God in eternity covered
over with some time-space-matter. Some people illogically say, “Look around the
wonders of nature. This is when I see God.” This is not rational. When you look
at nature all you can see is the outside time-space-matter. This is an outside
covering. You cannot see the eternity that is within as its substantial
framework. You cannot see it but you can think it, understand it, reason with
it. You can rationally understand that it is something spiritual or eternal that
makes the rock and keeps it to be what it is, second by second.
(E) Fifth Conclusion: Humans are Born
Dual Citizens, In Time and in Eternity
Before we acquire rational spirituality in our
understanding we are vulnerable to all sorts of misleading ideas and
philosophies. People debate whether there is an eternity, whether there is an
afterlife, whether heaven is on earth or in some other place, and so forth. Some
popular new age gurus say that eternity is here, that it is called stillness, or
peace, or whatever, and that you can have it and be in it, and then you are God
looking down at yourself doing things in the world of people and time. Many
scientists and intellectual leaders deny that there is God, afterlife, or
eternity. These are the ways in which people get into deep trouble, because
these illogical beliefs create maladaptation.
The symptoms of maladaptation characterize our life and our
society, namely, unhappiness, depression, rage, destructiveness, lack of
productivity and creativity, lack of health and vitality, lack of rational
management systems, and so on. These are the symptoms of thinking irrationally
about God, about eternity, about reality.
Since God is omnipotent and perfectly loving and wise, it
is illogical to think that we are born, then die, and that’s the end of our
existence. Think about you as a parent. Would you create a child that is going
to die when you can create one that is going to be immortal? Obviously you would
create children who continue to live forever. Now if you would do that, how can
we think logically that God would not? God is omnipotent and so clearly, He can
create living beings that are temporary or He can create living beings that are
permanent or immortal. Since God is perfect love and wisdom, it is rational to
think that He would create conscious human beings to live forever.
But we must understand how God does this, if we are going
to fully accept such a principle and reason from it in our mind.
God creates our existence when we are conceived and born.
Our existence starts in both worlds of time and eternity. This means that we are
born dual citizens. Our soul or spiritual body is born in eternity, which is
also called the spiritual world. Our physical body is conceived and born in time
and space. The two bodies are interconnected and act together as long as they
are connected. At death, the connection between the physical body and the
spiritual body is broken. We then continue our existence in the spiritual body
in eternity.
This may sound hypothetical at first. But upon more
reflection you can see rationally how this works. First, consider that
sensations, thoughts, and feelings are not physical objects in time and space.
Thoughts and feelings have no mass, no weight, require no space, are not
measurable by physical instruments. Only the brain’s electrical neural
activities can be measured, but not thoughts and feelings. Thoughts and feelings
are outside time and space, hence they are in eternity (see Section xx).
So if thoughts and feelings are not physical, and are not
housed in the brain, where are they?
They are in the mind or spiritual body. The spiritual body
and the physical body operate together, develop together. Our mental activities
and development take place solely in the spiritual body in eternity outside time
and space. Right now, as you are reading this, your thoughts, reactions, and
feelings cannot exist in this world, as the lines and the ink and the physical
light exist in this world. So right now you are operating in the physical world
from the spiritual world. You are not in the physical world. You are in the
spiritual world.
Right now you are temporarily connected to the physical
world through your physical body which is connected to your spiritual body which
is in eternity. Upon death of the physical body the connection is broken and you
become conscious instantly of the spiritual world. Right now you cannot see the
spiritual world of eternity and what is in it. It is necessary for our growth
and development as an immortal human being to acquire knowledge and experience
in our spiritual body. But this experience cannot be acquired directly in the
world of eternity into which we are born. Some mechanism had to be created by
God so that we can have experiences in time and space, and then begin our full
life in eternity, outside time and space.
(F) Sixth Conclusion: The Eternity of
the Afterlife is Our Mental World Now
This is the greatest open secret that is available to
anyone who is willing to think about rational spirituality. Much nonsense has
been written about where is eternity or where is the afterlife or where is
heaven or where is God. Even the most popular new age gurus and authors today
know absolutely nothing about this open secret that anyone could figure out with
rational spirituality.
The mental world = the afterlife world of eternity.
This open secret hits you as obvious as soon as you allow
yourself to think rationally about it. We have picked up so much illogical
thinking from society today that it prevents us from thinking rationally and
seeing the obvious. But it is obvious! Consider.
The mental world is the world of thoughts and feelings.
These are non-physical objects, outside time and space. Anything that is outside
time and space is in eternity. Obviously then, our mental world is the world of
eternity where thoughts and feelings exist.
We know the world of the afterlife, or eternity, very well
indeed. We are so skilled at it that we are able to create dreams that contain
dramatic scenery, exciting events, intense sensations of taste and touch,
unlimited resources in terms of how many houses or diamonds or bottles of wine
you want to have, or how famous you want to be. But also this: how scared you
can get with amazingly real nightmares. All this we can expertly produce in our
imagination. People illogically think that what we produce in the imagination is
not real. They don’t get too excited about the idea that they can have anything
they want in the dream world they create with their imagination. It’s not real
to them. So what, they think.
But when we start thinking rationally about it, we can see
that the objects we produce in our imagination or dream are real appearances.
They cannot be nothing. It’s not logical to think that a dream is nothing. A
dream is constructed, produced, created in our spiritual body called the
affective organ, the cognitive organ, and the sensorimotor organ. These three
organs make up our mind at various levels of operation. The affective organ’s
operations are experienced as having feelings. The cognitive organ’s operations
are experienced as having thoughts. The sensorimotor organ’s operations are
experienced as having sensations. Thoughts, dreams, visions, etc. are actual
operations in our spiritual organs. They actually become visible when we are no
longer connected to the physical body at death (see Section xx).
At death we start our conscious life in eternity and lose
all contact with the world of time and space. Although we lose contact with
physical objects we retain contact with the people we know and love because this
contact is based on thoughts and feelings, not merely physical contact. The
physical contact is no longer possible, but the mental contact is uninterrupted.
However, one is not conscious of this mental contact in a direct way, but in a
subtle way.
(G) Seventh Conclusion: We Are Born
With Heaven and Hell in Our Mind
Another way of saying this that we are receptive to both
heavenly and hellish influences. Every person has good traits like being able to
think and carry out required tasks. To finish a job requires persistence in
motivation, and this is a heavenly trait. To have and raise children requires
self-sacrifice and the love of others, and this is a heavenly trait. But to snap
at someone in anger not caring in that moment, about how it makes the person
feel, is a hellish trait. To cheat and lie and deceive so that we can unfairly
obtain something, or so that we can take advantage of someone, is a hellish
trait. To reject someone unfairly due to our prejudice, is a hellish trait. Some
people are depressed and can’t work, and this is a hellish trait. Being
aggressive on the road or obnoxious to a neighbor, are hellish traits, as are
mistreating animals or wasting resources.
So each person grows up with a pack of heavenly traits and
a pack of hellish traits in their personality and character. The hellish traits
form a society together in our mind, and this society is called hell. The
heavenly traits form a heavenly society in our mind. God is involved in the
every detail of setting up the heaven and the hell in the mind. This is critical
to our life in eternity. God does not allow heaven and hell to mix together in
our mind because they mutually destroy each other, being opposites and hatreds
to one another. So people alternate between heavenly states and hellish states
on a periodic basis – monthly, weekly, hourly, by the minute and second. God
controls the exact alternation, when, and where.
When we lose contact with the physical body, it immediately
breaks down into chemical matter. This is called the first death. We suddenly
become conscious in the spiritual world of eternity. But we are still the same
person. We have not changed anything. So our mental world doesn’t change that
much at first. We see our body just like we are used to, even though we realize
it’s not a physical body. We see ourselves in a mirror and we look similar to
how we looked when we passed on. We look around and things look similar to what
we saw before dying. But we quickly begin to notice the differences. Now we are
in a mental world, not physical. We notice things we could never notice before
about others who are around. They have an aura of light around the head. One can
see activity of light in the mental organs, actually seeing thoughts and
feelings in the person.
We see a house in the distance and we feel like walking
there. All of a sudden, we are there. We enter. At first we see people drinking
at a bar, but the next instant they are brandishing swords and running at you
menacingly. Suddenly you don’t see them and you are sitting with your father who
passed away years ago. And so on. You discover you can eat if you want to, but
you no longer have to do it to survive. Experiences come to you fast and
furious, as you explore your new life with all sorts of interesting people that
come around, and you notice that your face is changing. Your entire appearance
is changing.
You have new feelings you never knew you had. They are so
intense, so purely what they are. It frightens you. It elates you. You alternate
between the heaven and the hell you came with into eternity. But things are
getting more compulsive, more spontaneous, more emotional. You lose all sense of
control. None of the things that held you back before are able to contain these
new raw emotions, feelings, desires, compulsions, attractions. And very soon you
arrive at the moment of your second death. This is it. It’s the final free
choice you will be making on your own as an individual.
Quoting from the Writings Sacred Scripture:
AC 5935. VASTATION. After a spirit has
completed his time in the world of spirits, he at length arrives at the last
[period], which is his vastation. He then appears, for the most part, such as
he was in the world, and is set at liberty to go whither he pleases; and thus
he reaches a place where all conjunction with anything spiritual is taken
away. He thus becomes, as it were, silly, and casts himself into hell. (AC
5935)
It’s a simple choice: You must chose to give up all the
hellish traits or all the heavenly traits. It is impossible for you to continue
alternating. It’s completely out of your control, like the neurons in the brain
when you see something, or like the expansion of the lungs when you breathe in
air. Every human being is faced with this required last choice. You cannot keep
a single heavenly trait if you choose the hellish traits, and vice versa. Your
eternity is either in the heaven of your mind or in the hell of your mind. Once
the final choice is made, you cannot change your mind because half of your mind
is put the sleep forever (see Section xx).
At first we illogically think that hell is a punishment for
the bad things we did and heaven is the reward for the good things we did. This
is all right to think at first, while we are developing and growing. But to grow
up we need to think about this rationally or else we will reject the idea in our
interior mind. We then realize that since God is perfect in love it would be
illogical to think that God punishes people in the afterlife for the sins they
committed while attached to earth. Love cannot punish, but only emend. As
parents we realize we have to help our children to learn to be mature and
self-reliant. We use punishment to insure that this happens. But once we are in
the afterlife, what would punishment be for? God would not retaliate for He has
no such motivation.
Hence we conclude rationally that hell is not a punishment
but a choice. And likewise, heaven is not a reward but a choice. What would make
people want to choose hell?
We all are familiar with hell in our daily lives and
experiences. By observing our own thoughts and feelings we can notice how we
create a heaven and a hell in our mind. For instance, we may experience jealousy
of a person at work, and we are conscious of a negative emotion when we think or
see that person, like fear, resentment, annoyance. These are hellish feelings.
They do not exist in the heavens of our mind. Then we notice a strong desire to
be hostile to this person, to plot against the person, to try to get this person
in trouble. And we can also notice that when this person is in trouble, we feel
satisfied, happy, glowing. This is a scenario of how we can build up hell in our
mind, until it pervades all our thinking at work, and then beyond.
We can see rationally that we are not responsible for this
hell – initially. These negative emotions and hostile intentions and acts seem
to tumble out of us, spontaneously. Even when we try to stop them, they won’t.
So how can we be held responsible for them by God? Rationally we have to say
that God does not hold us responsible for this initial experiencing of the
negative emotions and intentions. It’s what we do next, that makes us guilty of
hell. This means: We will choose hell at our second death. This is called being
guilty, but you can see that it is free choice, the last free choice God allows
us to make.
And so it goes with all our weaknesses and negativity.
People experience the pleasure and delight of not having to work. But if they
turn this into a lifestyle, it becomes a hell in their mind. To create a heaven
in the mind is to do the opposite. People strive to please others because they
feel bad when others are upset because of them – this is building a heavenly
society in your mind. Some people devote tremendous care to a hobby or interest.
To get better at it becomes their striving, and this is building a heaven in the
mind.
Our heaven in eternity is built from our heavenly traits.
But we cannot hang on to them if we are unwilling to let go of every single
hellish trait. People who are unwilling to let go of some hellish trait, but
desire strongly to be in the heaven of their mind, are going to be in deep
trouble when they enter the afterlife. Surely this is going to mean a lot of
mental anguish for them before they can let go of the hellish trait. This is
sometimes subtle. For instance, some people will avoid being dishonest out of
fear of getting caught, even though they would do it if the fear were not there.
You can have two people, both avoiding to be dishonest, but one does it for an
external reason (presence of fear), while the other does it for an internal
reason (wanting to be good). In that case, one will choose hell while the other
will choose heaven, even though both lived similar outward lives.
(H) Eighth Conclusion: Heaven is a State
of Marriage Between Soul Mates
When we think about it rationally we can understand that
God created men and a women so that they may be conjoined together, so that out
of two distinct and unique individuals they may become as one distinct and
unique whole. Two halves of something can become one, but two wholes cannot
become one. Hence it is evident that the unit of the whole person is the man and
the woman conjoined as one. Only this can create a heaven in eternity out of
their mind. In the hells of people’s minds, instead of conjunction there is
disjunction, and instead of friendship there is hostility to one another.
Some people think that marriage is a piece of paper. More
couples today are inclined to shack up and even have children without getting
married. This is because they are allowing themselves to remain in the external
phase of marriage. At this level, marriage is a socio-legal contract and
arrangement, and couples who don’t want to participate in that arrangement,
perhaps as a form of protest and independence, do not see the purpose in getting
married. However this is faulty thinking and puts them in deep trouble. The
majority of those marriages end in divorce, and many of those that endure,
remain external marriages in which neither partner can be fully fulfilled or
happy, no longer involved in constantly growing together.
It is obvious that marriage must be part of the mechanism
God has created for a man and a woman to bond together, to fulfill each other,
and to raise children. Marriage is part of creation, part of how God fulfills
the grand plan of creating a heaven of eternity in the mind of the human race.
Our life tied to a physical body on earth is a temporary arrangement. We are
born dual citizens, and we are immortal beings. Our eternity starts in the
afterlife, about 36 hours after the corpse is cold or destroyed. Life then
continues in eternity, outside time and place, either in the heavens or the
hells of the individual’s mind. Each person makes that final choice at their
second death (see Section xx).
Marriage is a union of minds (see Section xx). Consider
that for two things to make a perfect whole, they must be reciprocals of each
other so they may fit into one functioning unit. For example, to open a locked
door or engine, we need a key and a keyhole. To light up for a smoke, you need a
cigar and a flame. To shake hands with someone with the right hand, you need to
face each other. An officer in the military needs underlings who carry out
orders. A marriage needs a man who wants to be a husband and a woman who wants
to be a wife.
Nothing in a man can be like anything in a woman. This is
the principle of reciprocity through maximum differentiation. Even if one thing
were the same in a man and a woman, they would no longer be able to form a
perfect unity. Every person is born either a man or a woman, and since we are
immortal, we remain what we were born. A woman’s physical body is a covering
around her spiritual body. Her physical shape and form merely reflects the shape
of her eternal and immortal spiritual body. It is the same with a man. This
spiritual anatomy insures that a woman and a man remain what they are. A woman’s
spiritual body reflects her mind, and so does a man’s spiritual body. Clearly,
the mind of a woman is different from the mind of a man, as is evident from the
body.
It is easy to see the reciprocity of man and woman when you
consider how they have sexual intercourse. This physical reciprocity is actually
an accurate reflection of their mental reciprocity. A woman cannot think one
thing that a man thinks in the same way that he thinks it, and it is the same
for a man. Similarly, a woman and a man cannot have the same feeling or emotion.
Men and women are not opposites; they are reciprocals. Opposites don’t fit and
cannot create a unity. But reciprocals can, and do.
Since every marriage starts with the external union, the
issue becomes how a couple can move to the internal union. The external phase of
marriage is adequate for producing and raising children, and for joining
together as partners in a team to help each other achieve more than what we can
do on our own in society. As well, many couples are polite and civil to one
another most of the time, and so they can have companionship and friendship,
instead of having to be alone or with people who are not committed to each other
in long term relationships. External marriage is therefore a good thing, a
useful thing, a necessary thing.
But it is not fulfilling!
In order for the wife and the husband to be really
fulfilled, really happy, really positive and productive and vibrant, they must
enter the interior marriage relationship. This is gradual and takes years, maybe
decades. But the critical issue is not how long it takes, but whether the couple
is moving ahead in that direction, year by year, and week by week.
Marriage is a spiritual conjunction between two minds and
therefore it involves a physiological change in the mind of each partner (see
Section xx). This physiological growth process involves the mental organ of the
woman becoming dependent on the mental organ of the man. This happens early in
the marriage phase because women are prepared since girlhood, to form themselves
according to a man. When a woman meets a man whom she is considering as a
possible husband, she begins the process of conjoining her mind to his mind.
Women do this spontaneously and with expert skill. They drink in the man’s
philosophy and they learn his sense of humor. A woman learns how to talk to the
man, how to listen to him, what to say, how to think things through, what to
choose, what to love – all as an effort to conjoin her mind to his. In this way,
the man feels that he is attached to her.
But note carefully: The man has done nothing yet to
reciprocate. He merely allows the woman to adapt her mentality to his so they
can be in one house and form a partnership in daily activities. This is the
external marriage that is suitable for raising a family and having a career. In
all these years the wife is marking time, waiting for her romance to become
reality in her husband. She is waiting for his reciprocation. She has conjoined
herself mentally and physically to him. Now it is his turn to reciprocate.
He now has to do what it takes to conjoin her to himself!
The moment he starts this physiological process, both are
thereby changed (see Section xx). Now they are finally taking off for their
eternity. Now he can see that it is not the children or the career that is the
most important for him and her. From now on he can clearly see that it is their
unity together that is the purpose of the whole thing, and was the purpose all
along. All else was necessary as a sort of intermediate stage for this, the real
thing.
When the husband reaches this stage, he is called
spiritually enlightened. What this means is discussed next.
(I) Ninth Conclusion: Divine Speech as
Sacred Scripture Produces Consciousness and Enlightenment
The word enlightenment has been bandied about for centuries
and more in our literature. Today’s new age gurus and authors use the word
frequently. They use it to refer to something mystical that is beyond human
words so they give it various symbolic names like Stillness, or Pure
Consciousness, or Ego-less State, and so forth. What are these names but words
we all know used in some unknown mysterious way – “beyond words to describe. You
can only know it if you experience it.” This is what Diane and I call the
conspiracy of the gurus (the title of one of our projected books). It’s a
conspiracy of silent agreement by teachers, authors, seminar leaders, noted
philosophers, etc. They did not enter into such an agreement officially or
directly by talking to each other.
But they all make the same mysterious claim to would be
followers and purchasers – Do what I tell you, step through these ritualistic
hoops, meditate so many hours in so many ways that I tell you, purchase my books
and audiotapes, believe in me like you believe in God, and at some unpredictable
point, Voila! Your inner eyes will come alive and you will see this Pure
Consciousness and you will feel its rational ecstasy, its bliss, its peak experience, and
so forth. Some gurus add self-flagellation as a requirement, others advise
against sexual contact with women. And so it goes. What are these things but
entertainment for those who are not serious about eternity, about heaven and
hell, about God.
The conspiracy of the gurus is centered in what is known in
philosophy as nondualism or nonduality. The is the explicit justified denial of
dualism or duality between God and human beings. The new age spirituality that
has invaded the Western mind in the past few decades is a fundamental attack
against the historical and ingrained Western rationality based on the duality of
God vs. the universe, or of the Divine Human vs. created human beings. This
philosophy is bent on merging the two worlds – the natural and the spiritual,
the temporal and the eternal. This merger is irrational and impossible as we can
realize by rational analysis (already discussed in several Conclusions above).
The reality is that the only enlightenment is the spiritual
light from God which we can receive in our mind through the interior way. An
example is our conscience (See Section
7.0.4.1). We do absolutely nothing to construct our conscience.
It is there for every human being. We instantly know what God defines as right
vs. wrong, good vs. bad, real vs. delusional. It is the same with Sacred
Scripture. Both of these methods are used by God to communicate with us
individually. Every individual feels that their conscience is their own. It is
one to one talk between God and human beings.
It is the same with Sacred Scripture. Since the beginning
of creation God formed the minds of people in three ways:
-
(1) unconsciously, in the background; in the form of
rationality;
-
(2) consciously, in the form of conscience, insight,
inspiration;
-
(3) consciously, in the form of doctrine of truth from
Sacred Scripture.
All three methods are called true spiritual enlightenment.
We have much to discuss about how these three methods actually work. To
anticipate just a bit: There are two levels of reading Sacred Scripture. One is
called the level of sensuous or mysterious spirituality, and the other is called
the level of rationality, as discussed in these Ten Conclusions.
The lower, external, literal, historical level of reading
Sacred Scripture creates religions – diversified, in conflict with each other,
based on blind faith or persuasion (like so-called miracles and so-called
holiness or saintliness). The higher, interior, universal, culture-free, genuine
spiritual level creates theistic science, rationality, celestial thinking as in
eternity. This is the level that reflects and contains Divine Speech, Divine
Meaning, Divine Order. As we study this level of meaning of Divine Speech, we
extract the inner hidden meaning by rational Conclusions. This is what God is
talking to us about. It’s about our mind. Our eternity. Our heaven and hell.
There is no other saintliness. No other holiness. No mystery. No ritual. Just
this rational understanding of Divine Speech (see Section xx).
This reveals to us everything we want to know. We can
understand all that we need to do and all that we can do. God is working for us
because we are obeying His order. We must understand this Order to obey it, to
put our mind in that Order. It is a rational Order because God is a Divine
Human, has a mind, thinks, wants things, creates with purpose, loves. Divine
Love is the desire God has to share what He has in His Mind, His Feelings of
Bliss and Happiness, His way of loving one another. Sacred Scripture reveals at
this level of reading and understanding the verses, that God creates the
universe for the purpose of having endless numbers of human beings end up in the
heaven of their conjugial eternity as husband and wife!! You can read that
again, Steve We can prove it! this is Divine Love and this is the purpose of the
universe. There is no mystery, only rationality.
(J) Tenth Conclusion: Salvation,
Liberation, Peace, and Wisdom Are Attained By Spiritual Discipline
In a real sense this last Conclusion is the most important
because the last and the beginning of anything contain all that is in between.
The beginning of this is
God exists.
This is the starting point. All the rest follows logically
from this one truth. And the ending is about salvation, liberation, peace, and
wisdom, which must be obtained by spiritual discipline.
The purpose of spiritual discipline is twofold. The first
is to prevent ourselves from choosing to live in the hells of our mind when we
enter eternity at death. The second is to prepare ourselves to choose to live in
the heavens of our mind. No other spiritual discipline is worth anything in
comparison to these two steps. This is the spiritual discipline commanded by God
in all Sacred Scripture and it has to do with how we can manage to enter
heaven. God commands this discipline to influence us to follow it. He wants us
to follow this discipline so that we may be successful in rejecting our inborn hellish
loves, and in choosing our heavenly loves which are also given in our mind.
The purpose of our life here on earth is to learn to reject the enjoyable
hellish loves and to learn to feel attraction for the heavenly loves, which do
not appear so enjoyable at first, but later, they are felt with far greater joy
than anything before. Spiritual discipline leads to the death
of the old corrupt self that hurts others and destroys self, to the birth of the new self, that
respects others and enjoys virtuous mental states.
What is salvation? It is the acquired ability to reject
hellish loves (egotism and lusts) and to accept heavenly loves (virtues and
conjugial love). How do we know rationally which love is hellish and which is
heavenly? How do we avoid doubt and confusion? People can be misled by teachers,
writers, and prophets who promote untruth.
The only answer is from the Divine
Psychologist and from
Sacred Scripture when it is studied more and more at the interior spiritual level
of meaning, not just at the literal
historical level. The knowledge and understanding we get from this
study and the consequent enlightenment, is called the Doctrine of Truth from Sacred Scripture
(see Section xx).
God the Divine Psychologist in every person's
mind, manages all the details of
our mind, the details we are aware of consciously and the details we are not
aware of because they are going on unconsciously. The mind is an immortal
biological engine that stays active from birth to endless eternity. How could an
engine run by itself? It could not. God creates the immortal mental engine and
keeps it running in such a way that it evolves more and more towards its
perfection, never quite attaining it, but getting closer and closer to it
endlessly. God manages this endless and ceaseless activity. Not a single thought
or sensation can enter your mind or stay there as a memory by itself. God
manages this process, just as God manages the details of the molecular motions
that construct the biochemistry and physiology of your physical body. Nothing
can run by itself, not a molecule, not a galaxy, not a human mind. And what is
true of the whole is also true of every part. In other words, no part or detail
of any activity can go on without God managing its course and existence. This
conclusion is a logical necessity that follows from the premise that God is
omnipotent. No detail can be exempted.
How do we know all this? God has revealed the method He uses
for our regeneration, which is the containment or confinement of the hells in
our mind, allowing the opening of the
heavens in our mind. Regeneration is effected by temptations (see Section
xx). God as the Divine
Psychologist, brings us through sequenced experiences and their thoughts, so
that we can consciously realize as-of ourselves, where the evil trait is in us, and
where the heavenly trait is, i.e., which is which. Then the Divine Psychologist
brings us into the temptation
event which requires of us to use the doctrine of truth from Sacred Scripture that we
have acquired in our thinking. This is the voice of conscience strengthened
by reason. The Divine Psychologist activates our conscience in the affective
organ, giving us a clear and intense feeling of right or wrong, good or bad.
Then comes our turn. We reciprocate God's action by reasoning it out with the
truths we have from Sacred Scripture in our mind from prior study. is reasoning
process is the application of rational truth to the situation that our
conscience has flagged for us. So the sequence is:
-
(1) situation, temptation event (God's
action)
-
(2) voice of conscience (our reaction)
-
(3) reasoning with spiritual truth from
Sacred Scripture (joint action God and us)
-
(4) resistance to and rejection of
temptation, thus spiritual victory (as-of self battle and effort)
-
(5) new enlightenment and heavenly peace
(our reception of God's action)
-
(6) new opening of our heaven (our love for
virtues)
This process of God and human interactionism goes on
hour by hour, every day, every year, until the passing on
at death and the resuscitation in eternity. Then it continues there in our heaven, but in
a different way. Those who choose to live in the hells of their mind do not
regenerate any more. Hence they cannot improve. They cannot because they won’t.
God never forces people against their free will choice. When a person insists on
a certain choice and won't give it up no matter what, then God cooperates by
giving the person the ability to carry out that choice. This is called being in
the hells of your mind. God manages every detail in the hells and in the
heavens. Both are details happening in the human mind of eternity. God manages
all details. People who spend their eternity in the hells of their mind are
managed by God so that (a) they don't get worse than they have to; (b) they
don't torture others in hell beyond a certain point; and (c) they don't
influence or possess the natural mind of people on earth except when they are
raised into the resuscitation zone where they serve to excite temptations in
people's minds (see Section xx).
There are natural temptations, spiritual temptations, and celestial temptations
(see Section xx).
Exercise:
Here is an instructional story that I copied
from an email discussion:
Seems there was a monk who plopped himself
down in a busy marketplace in order to meditate on God. Rushing through the
marketplace was a housewife. Focused on the shopping list in her mind, she
bowled over the monk without realizing he was there, and hurriedly continued
on her way. The monk quickly righted himself, and shouted after the woman,
'Why don't you watch where you're going? Can't you see I was meditating on
God? How dare you, a lowly householder, disrespect a man of God!' The
sharpness of the monk's voice having pierced her focused attention, the
housewife stopped and turned. Realizing now what had happened, she said to the
monk, 'I was concerned with my shopping list and didn't notice you. Had you
been as concerned with God as I am with my shopping list, you wouldn't have
noticed me!
What are your thoughts on this story in
relation to the whole Section? Try to figure out the symbolism involved. What in
our own lives is represented by the busy housewife and the uncharitable monk?
1.1.4.1
How the Idea of God Makes Us Immortal
In the following quote from the Writings Sacred Scripture
"the learned" refers to the negative bias in science, while "the simple" refers
to those who accept the literal sense of Sacred Scripture. If you read theistic
psychology from the negative bias perspective of non-theistic psychology, you are
called "the learned" because you accept the perspective of the negative bias
scientists, as taught to you in your science education and professional
enculturation. You are choosing by default to maintain this negative perspective
on God and dualism. But when you accept what Sacred Scripture says in its
literal sense, you are called "the simple" because you are not on your defensive
guard when hearing about God and science in one focus. Here, Swedenborg is given
to write down the content of his conversation with people who at resuscitation
have arrived into the world of spirits with the negative bias perspective on
dualism and the afterlife of eternity.
AC 3747. I have occasionally conversed with spirits
concerning the learned of our age-that they know only the distinction of man
into internal and external, and this not from any reflection on the interior
things of the thoughts and affections in themselves, but from the Word of the
Lord; and that still they are ignorant what the internal man is, and that many
even have doubts as to whether it exists, and also deny its existence, because
they do not live the life of the internal man, but that of the external; and
because they are so much led astray by the appearance as regards brute
animals, in their seeming like themselves in respect to organs, viscera,
senses, appetites, and affections.
And it was said that the learned know less about such
subjects than the simple, and that still they seem to themselves to know much
more; for they dispute about the interaction of the soul and body, and even
about the nature of the soul, as to what it is; when yet the simple know
that the soul is the internal man, and that it is man's spirit which is to
live after the death of the body; also that it is the real man which is in the
body.
[2] And further it was said that more than the simple,
the learned make themselves out to be like the brutes, and ascribe all things
to nature, and scarcely anything to the Divine; and still further, that
they do not reflect that as distinguished from brute animals man has a
capacity for thinking about heaven, and about God, and thereby of being
elevated above himself, consequently of being conjoined with the Lord by love;
and thus that men cannot but live after death to eternity.
And it was added that they are especially ignorant that
all things whatsoever belonging to man depend on the Lord through heaven, and
that heaven is the Grand Man, to which correspond all things in man in both
general and particular, and also all things in nature; and possibly when they
shall hear and read these things they will seem to them like paradoxes, and
unless experience confirms them they will reject them as a fanciful affair; as
they will also do when they shall hear that there are three degrees of life
in man, as there are three degrees of life in the heavens, that is, three
heavens and that man so corresponds to the three heavens that when he is in
the life of good and truth, and by this life an image of the Lord, he is
himself in image a little heaven.
[3] I have been instructed concerning these degrees of
life-that it is the last or ultimate degree of life which is called the
external or natural man by which man is like animals as regards lusts and
fantasies; that it is the second degree of life which is called the
internal and rational man by which man is above animals, for it is through
this that he is able to think and will what is good and true, and have
dominion over the natural man, by restraining and also rejecting its lusts and
the resultant fantasies, and also by reflecting within himself concerning
heaven, nay, concerning Divine, which brute animals are altogether incapable
of doing; and lastly that the third degree of life is that which is the most
unknown to man, although it is that through which the Lord inflows into the
rational mind, whereby man has the faculty of thinking as a man, and also has
conscience, and perception of what is good and true, and also elevation by the
Lord toward Himself.
But these things are remote from the ideas of the learned
of this age, who merely dispute whether a thing exists; and who, so long as
they do this, cannot know that it does exist, and still less what it is. (AC
3747)
In other words, when we place ourselves in a receptive
perspective on God and Sacred Scripture we can know that we are eternal spirits
in a temporary material body":
"the simple know that the soul is the internal man, and
that it is man's spirit which is to live after the death of the body; also
that it is the real man which is in the body."
What makes us immortal is not the prolongation of human
life in the physical body. Our immortality must be something that we already
possess in eternity. The natural or animal mind cannot operate with
concepts that are based on eternity. God and eternity are rational concepts, not
physically sensuous or empirical.
[the learned] do not reflect that as distinguished from
brute animals man has a capacity for thinking about heaven, and about God, and
thereby of being elevated above himself, consequently of being conjoined with
the Lord by love; and thus that men cannot but live after death to eternity.
Our life in eternity is possible because of our
"conjunction with God by love." In other words, by having a rational concept of
God, and by loving God, we are "conjoined" to God. Since God is in eternity, we
are being conjoined to immortal life in eternity. Without this knowledge of God,
we cannot be conjoined to eternity. All human beings have a rational level of
thinking and have an idea of God and eternity. Hence all human beings are
immortal. Note what the passage says about our mind being "in image a little
heaven":
there are three degrees of life in man, as there are
three degrees of life in the heavens, that is, three heavens and that man so
corresponds to the three heavens that when he is in the life of good and
truth, and by this life an image of the Lord, he is himself in image a little
heaven.
We have both hell and heaven in the mind (see Section xx).
This is obvious to everyone when we reflect on how we sometimes feel great and
at other times we feel bad, even very very bad. When we feel bad we cannot be in
our heaven, obviously, since heaven is nothing else than feeling good. If we are
not in our heaven, we are in our hell. We alternate in our heavenly feelings and
hellish feelings. Similarly, when we are in our heaven we not only feel good but
we are being genuine, authentic, real. We are being good to others, and that's
the main source of our feeling good.
-
Heaven is feeling good from doing good, and feeling bad
from doing bad.
-
Hell is feeling good from doing bad, and feeling bad from
doing good.
The feelings in the hell of our mind appear to be good but
are the opposite in disguise. What creates this falsified appearance? It's
critical to know this. Without knowing this we are unable to recover once we are
in the hell of our mind. No one knows the answer to this except from Sacred
Scripture in its scientific correspondential sense.
The reason why doing bad appears good to us when we are in
the hell of our mind, is that doing bad is a sensorimotor act that follows from
the conjunction or cooperative action between a prior affective act (intending
bad) and a corresponding cognitive act. There must be a corresponding cognitive
act to the bad intention. The cognitive act is the act of justifying the evil
intention by thinking that in this case it is good despite what it looks like.
This gives us permission to carry out the bad act. For example, you finally find
a parking space after having to look for it a long time, and when you get there
you notice that one of the adjoining cars parked over the white line in the
vacant parking space. You realize there is not enough space for you to pull in
and be able to open the door to get out. You feel angry against the
inconsiderate driver. You get out and with your key you scratch the side of the
offending car. You feel better as you drive away.
What happened here? When you realized you would not be able
to park, you felt very bad. You were in the hell of your mind. That is, your
consciousness descended into that portion of your mind that is the source of bad
feelings and negative emotions. None of these feelings or emotions are possible
when your consciousness ascends into the heaven of your mind. You are in your
hell when you feel the awful explosion inside of you as you explode with anger
and fury. What is this feeling? It is not a civilized feeling. It is not a
rational feeling. It is a dangerous feeling. It is hostile. That feeling now
activated in you, wants to continue living and enduring in you. It attaches
itself to your consciousness. Now you are immersed in that feeling of rage. It
surrounds you. It is like drowning.
As the evil feeling struggles to continue surviving in you,
it searches your memory and your philosophy and quickly finds a situational
condition, an exception clause to the general rule. The general rule is that you
think of yourself as good person at least some of the time, and some people
think they are good most of the time. This is the reputation a person has with
himself or herself. So as you think of yourself as a good person, but you are
now feeling like retaliating against the other driver, you give yourself
permission to do something bad by justifying it, which means finding a rationale
that would allow you to do and still you could retain the reputation of being a
good person.
For example, you might think that the other driver is a
really really bad person for doing this to you. He or she is a menace to
everyone. Somebody ought to teach this inconsiderate person a lesson. Everybody
will be benefited in the future if you teach this person a lesson. You go ahead
and plan some act of hostility and retaliation. You see the opportunity as you
are holding the key in your hand standing by the other car. You go ahead and key
the car leaving a long scratch. You are feeling better for doing something bad
but in your mind it is not bad. It is just and deserved punishment. You are
unable to see that your consciousness is now rooting itself in the hell of your
mind.
How do you get out of hell? We do it by rational
understanding.
In order to understand ourselves we need to know that we
are living mentally along three levels or degrees of operation called natural,
rational, and celestial. The natural degree of our life is called the natural
mind or the natural self. We share this degree of life with animals. Next, the
second degree of our life is called rational. Animals do not possess this degree
of life. The rational mind or self is capable of understanding the difference
between God and us, and possesses the voice of conscience by which we know right
from wrong and good from evil (See
Section 7.0.4.1). Next, the celestial mind is unconscious while we
are attached to the physical body. After resuscitation, we continue life in
eternity in the conscious awareness of our celestial mind, which sometimes is
also called the spiritual mind (see Section xx). In the quote above (AC 3747)
these three degrees of life are described as follows:
(a) it is the last or ultimate degree of life which is
called the external or natural man by which man is like animals as regards
lusts and fantasies;
(b) it is the second degree of life which is called the
internal and rational man by which man is above animals, for it is through
this that he is able to think and will what is good and true, and have
dominion over the natural man, by restraining and also rejecting its lusts and
the resultant fantasies, and also by reflecting within himself concerning
heaven, nay, concerning Divine, which brute animals are altogether incapable
of doing;
(c) the third degree of life is that which is the most
unknown to man, although it is that through which the Lord inflows into the
rational mind, whereby man has the faculty of thinking as a man, and also has
conscience, and perception of what is good and true, and also elevation by the
Lord toward Himself.
In other words, the thoughts and feelings in our natural
mind are created out of the sensorimotor experience in our daily living with the
physical body. At birth our natural mind is empty of sensory or cultural
content. Animals on the other hand are born with specific content that varies
with each species. As a result they do not need to be educated in culture and
language. Some animals are separated from parents immediately at birth so they
cannot be trained, and there are species that fend for themselves from the
moment of birth. Both these types of animals are able to survive and thrive.
Observation shows that small animals with simple physiology, like ants and bees,
engage in complex social interactions by inborn mental processing that operates
in their natural mind. Nevertheless, no matter how much complexity animals are
born with, their natural mind is physiologically not capable of operations that
belong to the human rational mind. We may be very impressed by the intelligence
demonstrated by our pets of many species, but we all know that they will never
be able to vote or to plan for a wedding.
We are human not because we have a natural mind,
like animals, capable of learning from experience and of adapting to changing
conditions in the environment.
We are human because we have a rational mind above our
natural mind.
The rational mind is the beginning of being human (see
Section xx).
The quote above says that the second degree of our life is
called rational and it is by this means that we are "above animals." This
means that we are able "to have dominion" over our "lusts and fantasies." To be
above something physically corresponds mentally to a higher level of functioning
-- being able to realize and understand what we cannot at a lower level. This
brings the power to control. In human beings the rational self has a built in
dominance or power over the natural self. This is the reason that civilization
is able to grow from savage to modern. Our history of development or evolution
clearly shows that the rational mind of the human race is gaining power over the
natural mind. For example, today we have countries called democracies that have
laws that protect the human rights of people and their fundamental right to due
process regardless of social standing and power. Contrast this with what the
attitude is in countries that are not practicing democracies.
Contrast how people are today and how they appear to be
from the Old Testament or other historical documents. Our modern mentality is
elevated compared to them. They had laws in place that discriminated against
people on the basis of birth and race. They had laws that allowed the abuse of
women by men. Etc. We can easily see that the mentality of the human race was
much more animalistic and less rational in comparison to today. These changes
occurred gradually as the rational mind was able to put the natural mind under
its control.
The quote above points out that the natural mind of human
beings, no more than the natural mind of animals, is not capable of "reflecting
within himself concerning heaven, nay, concerning Divine, which brute animals
are altogether incapable of doing." The more we are rational the better we are
able to reflect on God, dualism and the afterlife of eternity. These are
rational ideas, rational concepts, not natural. The natural mind can learn a
definition of the word "God" or the expression "the afterlife in eternity." But
this would merely be rote memory, not rational understanding. The natural mind
can only understand concepts or meanings that are based in the sensory
experience we have through the physical body. These natural concepts contain the
perspective and the assumptions of space, time, and matter. This is why the
natural mind sticks with the negative bias in science. In our natural mind,
there is no possibility of creating real-world concepts about no-time, no-space,
no-matter. Hence God and eternity cannot be accepted as a possibility.
No rational concept can be accepted at the natural level.
The quote above says that it is not until the next higher
degree of life called the celestial mind, that we become true and genuine human
beings. This degree is called "the most unknown" while we are still connected to
the physical body. That it is "most unknown" signifies that it is unconscious
while we are connected to the physical body, thus before resuscitation (see
Section xx). It is revealed that spiritual heat and spiritual light "inflow into
the rational mind." from the Spiritual Sun, or God. In other words the capacity
to have genuinely human feelings and to think rationally in our daily living, is
a capacity that unconsciously flows into the rational mind through our celestial
mind. The more we grow in rational spirituality the more we are allowing this
celestial influx to influence and manage our daily thoughts and feelings. These
more interior rational understandings elevate us in consciousness and operation
to the celestial level of life. We can now extract spiritual truths from Sacred
Scripture and live according to them (see Section xx). We thereby obtain the
life of heaven here, while we are still in the physical sphere, and then
afterward, in our conjugial eternity in heavenly life (see Section xx).
For views on God that appear related to
theistic psychology, but are not, see:
Thomas Aquinas: Reasons in Proof of the
Existence of God (1270) at:
http://www.fordham.edu/halsall/source/aquinas3.html
Charles Tart: A Future for Dualism as an
Empirical Science. (2006).
http://www.newdualism.org/papers/C.Tart/Tart-Dualism.pdf
A Practical Man's Proof of God:
http://www.doesgodexist.org/Phamplets/Mansproof.html
Scientific Proof Of God:
http://www.allaboutcreation.org/scientific-proof-of-god-faq.htm
If you google "proof of God" you will get more
links of this type.
1.1.4.1.1
The Incarnation Event: God Enters the World of History
and Science
About two thousand years ago an extraordinary
and totally unique event took place that altered the course of human evolution
in a fundamental way that is only now being discovered by science. The Universal
God the Divine Human, Creator and Manager of the universe, entered history and
science by the Incarnation Event (see entry for Incarnation Event in the
Subject Index in Volume 18).
This event had been foretold in the most
ancient Sacred Scriptures (see Section xx).
The ancient prophecy was given at the
beginning of a phase of human evolution called The Fall (see Section xx).
Before this, the celestial human race existed on this earth (see Section xx). At
the end of this phase called the Golden Period, the new spiritual phase began on
this earth. We are of this race. We are called spiritual in contradistinction to
the earlier race called celestial. The human mind was created in three discrete
layers -- celestial, spiritual, natural (see Section xx). Hence the evolution of
the race must follow the anatomical composition of the human mind. The celestial
layer of the human race was evolved, developed, and completed through the lives
of the individuals that lived in the early generations on this earth. When the
celestial anatomical layer was complete, the celestial race was "consummated" or
extinguished. A few "remnants" whose anatomical structures deviated from the
norm were the carriers that insured the connection between the extinguished
celestial race and the newly beginning spiritual race.
As we are part of the spiritual race we
possess a functioning operational celestial layer of our mind even though
nothing of its operations is conscious to us. Our celestial mind is above our
spiritual mind, a discrete degree within it, and whatever is within or above, is
far superior all that is below it. Our celestial mind is far superior to our
spiritual mind. But even so, we only become conscious of our spiritual mind
after resuscitation (see Section xx). This happens just a few hours after
physical death. When we are resuscitated we at first are conscious in our
natural mind, which is the layer we know ourselves in everyday life here on
earth. This natural layer forms the content of who we know ourselves to be. But
shortly thereafter our natural mind begins to fade like a distant memory -- our
identity, profession, hobbies, knowledge of history and science -- all of this
that is stored up in our natural mind, slowly begins to fade like a distant
memory from childhood or some land we once visited. See
the Layers Diagram.
This happens because the natural mind is
totally unsuited for life in eternity which is a mental world without time,
space, matter, or sickness and death. Everything now depends on our rational
feeling and thinking. What kind of people we are with and what the environment
and situation is like, depends entirely on our ruling loves. Not like before on
earth out of which the content of the natural mind was formed. Now in eternity
the laws that govern reality are purely rational laws. To try to operate with
the natural mind after resuscitation doesn't get you anywhere. You have to
disregard your identity, your culture, your nominal religion, your citizenship
awards, your achievements and reputation -- all of these things are formed in
your natural mind and are part of the natural mind. But after resuscitation
you are existing in your spiritual mind.
Swedenborg reports that some people he talked
to after resuscitation insisted on not letting go of the natural mind. The only
way this is possible is to act insane in the spiritual mind, pretending by
fantasy that you are still in your natural mind and in your physical body on
earth. The result of this spiritual inanity is very sad and frightening. People
in this mental state are victims of their own emotions and feelings. In the
spiritual mind the environment around you is created by correspondences of your
emotions and thoughts. So if you have insane thoughts and emotions the
environment you exist in are correspondences to them in the natural world. For
instance the intention to rob someone by misleading them and posing as a friend,
immediately causes deadly scorpions and poisonous flying snakes with an ominous
darkening of the skies. So the intended victim can immediately recognize the
stranger's evil intentions. Nevertheless, some victims who are also spiritually
insane, fantasize something totally different that is going on. And so they fall
victim to the machinations of others. And Swedenborg reports that no matter how
clever someone is, there is one who is more clever in and endless series of the
layer of the human mind called the hells.
Everyone is born into eternity with a
permanent and immortal mental body and temporary physical body (see Section xx).
After the celestial race was extinguished, as discussed above, what happened to
those people who had been celestial and had lived on earth all those
generations? Well, they were in the immortal heavens of their mind called the
celestial heavens of the most ancient peoples (see Section xx). Swedenborg
visited with them in their mental states, seeing the habitations they lived in
that corresponded to their feelings and thoughts. So even though the celestial
race died out on earth, the people of that race continued to evolve in their
celestial heavens.
This fact is of greatest importance for us to
understand because our unconscious celestial mind is made up of their celestial
heavens. Whatever the mental operations they experience, these are the causes of
the operations in our unconscious spiritual mind. And whatever we experience
here in our conscious natural mind is a consequence of the operations going on
in our spiritual mind, which are connected by correspondence to the celestial
mind of those who are in that state. Hence it is that the various distinct
layers of the human mind are connected by the laws and operations of
correspondence (see Section xx).
The Universal God the Divine Human manages the
layers of the human mind through the laws of correspondences. Divine Speech or
Divine Truth issues forth from God's mind into the layers of the human mind,
first into the inmost or highest layer called celestial heavens, and from there
in descends or externalizes by correspondence into the spiritual layer of our
mind, and from there by correspondence into the conscious natural layer of our
mind where it presents itself as Sacred Scripture in a natural historical
language. This process of the sequence of correspondences initiated by Divine
Speech is the continuous and permanent method by which God rules the universe
(see Section xx). See the
Layers Diagram.
Until two thousand years ago the long history
of evolution of the race on earth was managed by God the Divine Human in this
way through correspondences. But there was a creeping mentality of materialism
that came about as the natural mind of the human race on earth was becoming more
scientific and more rational in consciousness, mentality, and civilization. In
order to allow for democratic modernism to evolve on this planet it was
necessary to develop the sensuous sub-layer of the natural mind as opposed to
its rational layer. The sensuous layer of the natural mind tends to be submerged
into materialism to such an extent that we start denying the existence of God or
the afterlife of eternity. These concepts require a rational understanding and
when people reject rational understanding as not important to them, they lose
the ability to comprehend spiritual things like theistic psychology.
See the Layers
Diagram.
So materialism was strengthened while
religious ideas and practices became cultural and national expressions rather
than spiritual. Once people lost their rational ability to see spiritual
truths and realities, they could no longer be conscious or aware of the
existence of God and the afterlife. Even those who had religious ideas and
practices could not understand Sacred Scripture in a universal scientific or
rational sense.
What was God going to do about this? This was
a serious situation where the human race could die out so that those who were
already in their eternity could also be destroyed since the created order no
longer worked to keep all things into one synergistic unit. Of course God had
already provided for the solution since the beginning of creation, since to God
all things are united into one -- past, present, and all future. The solution
had to be such that the natural mind could once more recognize that God exists.
God cannot exist for us in full strength or
conjunction unless each individual reciprocates God's love for the individual.
We must acknowledge God's love for us or else we cannot closely be conjoined to
God. And without this there are consequences. God manages molecules, planets,
animals, and all things directly by correspondences which provide for the
cause-effect relation between adjacent layers of discrete degrees (see Section
xx). God manages human beings in two ways. One is immediately and
unconsciously across the layers of the mind. The second is mediately and
consciously through the conscious layers of the mind. The celestial race is
conscious at the celestial level. The spiritual race is conscious at the natural
level prior to resuscitation, and afterwards at the spiritual level. When
materialism took hold of the natural mind on earth, God disappeared from
conscious awareness of people on earth.
The prior conscious awareness of God was
replaced by a blind faith in God.
But a blind faith is not the same as a
rational faith based on conscious understanding of God such as we have in
theistic psychology. Blind faith only enters the natural layer of the mind. The
spiritual layer requires rational faith. So while people on earth had a rational
faith in their unconscious celestial and spiritual mind, they only had a blind
faith at the conscious natural level.
The only way God could remedy this
situation is by entering history and science.
God made Himself be born as a Divine Human
Child. This Child was at first not conscious of who He was, namely the
Incarnated God in the natural or physical world. God the Divine Human was always
both Divine and Human. This is why He created human beings who are in His Image
as the Divine Human. So God has always been in the Human Form. However, God's
Human Form was a mental body that consisted of a celestial affective organ and a
spiritual cognitive organ. The affective organ is in the Human Form and the
cognitive organ is in the Human Form. This is therefore also true of us. Our
affective and cognitive organs are both in the human form.
However, God did not have a physical body.
This was completely unnecessary in the prior generations because people could
see spiritually, and therefore they could see God's Human Form replicated in
their own mental body. People were able to look upon the human form they had and
see God's Human Form. But after the Fall, the spiritual race was no longer able
to see God's Human Form in their own body and mind. Whenever God wanted people
to have a communicative exchange with Him He would "possess" or take over the
conscious mind of an individual in the celestial or spiritual race in their
heavens. They were called "angels" when they appeared to people's natural
consciousness. God spoke through the angels and everyone could see and hear
that.
But once materialism crept into the mind,
people were no longer able to even believe that there are angels, let alone see
and hear them through their internal mind. In the past God could communicate
with people's internal mind and thereby influence them and protect them. But
this path of communications was destroyed by materialistic thinking which denied
God and taught the negative bias in science. This is what you and I were taught
in our generation. Hence we no longer had the ability to hear God, to recognize
Divine Speech in Sacred Scripture.
But when God entered the physical world, this
suddenly changed. The Divine Child grew into an adult male and He declared
Himself to be Divine. God's life on earth as a citizen of a small mid-eastern
nation created a historical biography, which makes God's presence on earth a
historical fact. This was His mission, to make Himself once more visible to
humankind on earth. Now people had a choice as to whether to acknowledge God or
not. People did not have that choice before God's Incarnation.
Furthermore, by entering history, God
entered science.
It is true that the literal sense of the New
Testament Sacred Scripture is used as a religion by various groups who disagree
with each other on almost everything about God and the afterlife. It is the
literal sense of the New Testament Sacred Scripture that gives the historical
account of God's Incarnation and its details.
Quoting from the Writings Sacred Scripture:
AC 2803. (...) But the Divine Human which
was born from eternity was also born in time; and what was born in time, and
glorified, is the same. Hence it is that the Lord so often said that He was
going to the Father who sent Him; that is, that He was returning to the
Father. And in John: [New Testament Sacred Scripture]
In the beginning was the Word (the
"Word" is the Divine Truth itself), and the Word was with God, and the
Word was God; the same was in the beginning with God. All things were
made by Him, and without Him was not anything made that was made. And the
Word was made flesh, and dwelt among us, and we saw His glory, the glory
as of the Only-begotten of the Father, full of grace and truth (John 1:1-3,
14; see also John 3:13; 6:62).
(AC 2803)
Doc. Lord 1. The Word was made flesh, and
dwelt among us, and we beheld His glory, the glory as of the
Only-begotten of the Father, full of
grace and truth (John 1:14).
The light is come into the world and men loved the darkness rather than the
light, because their deeds were evil (John 3:19).
While ye have the light, believe in the light, that ye may be sons of light.
I am come a light into the world, that whosoever believeth in Me should not
abide in the darkness (John 12:36, 46).
From these passages [in the New Testament
Sacred Scripture] it is evident that the Lord is God from eternity, and that
this God is the selfsame Lord who was born in the world; for it is said that
the Word was with God, and God was the Word, and also that without Him was not
anything made that was made; and it is added that the Word was made flesh, and
they beheld Him. (Lord 1)
TCR 3. (...) Jehovah God is Love itself and
Wisdom itself, or Good itself and Truth itself. He came down in the form of
Divine Truth, which is the Word and which was God with God, and took upon
Himself human form, so as to reduce to order everything in heaven, in hell and
in the church. For at that time the power of hell was stronger than the power
of heaven, and on earth the power of evil was stronger than the power of good,
so that utter damnation stood threatening at the gates. This impending
damnation was removed by Jehovah God by means of His Human, which was Divine
Truth, and thus angels and men were redeemed. Afterwards He united in His
Human Divine Truth with Divine Good, or Divine Wisdom with Divine Love, and so
returned into the Divinity which was His from eternity, together with and in
His glorified Human. This is the meaning of the passage in John: [New
Testament Sacred Scripture]
The Word was with God and the Word was
God; and the Word was made flesh. John 1:1, 14.
(TCR 3)
Here there is an explanation about the New
Testament Sacred Scripture saying that "the Word was God ... And the Word was
made flesh." The Word" = Divine Truth or Divine Speech = God the Divine Human.
"Was made flesh" = incarnation in a physical body on earth. That this was God
who incarnated is clear from the statement that "the Word was God' and that the
Word was made flesh. Hence it was God who incarnated in a physical body on
earth. This is the Divine Child (see Section xx).
The literal sense of Sacred
Scripture is always used by religion, not science. Hence there are disagreements
according to culture and interpretation. But the correspondential sense of
Sacred Scripture reveals its scientific sense, which is universal because it
does not mention culture or anything in the natural mind, but only the spiritual
and celestial mind. Theistic psychology is based only on the correspondential
sense and hence cannot be identified with any religion. The Incarnation Event is
therefore not only an religious event but an evolutionary scientific event.
The correspondential sense of the Old and New
Testament Sacred Scripture reveals that the Divine Child created a new layer in
His Natural mind that did not exist before in the human race. This new layer is
called the spiritual-natural layer or the interior-natural layer. Once this
layer was created in the Divine Child's mind, it became available to every human
being, past, present, and future. This was the momentous new evolutionary
step that was taken by the human race about two thousand years (see Section
xx). See the Layers
Diagram.
From then on we would be able to be
consciously aware of spiritual truths. This fact then restored the race to its
celestial level, though in a totally different way. Now we would be able to
receive a new mind that was not contaminated by inherited evils. This new mind
then could form the basis for our heavenly eternity. This new mind was
constructed within our natural mind, so that we could be conscious of it. But
this ability would be dependent on our regeneration. Only when we are willing to
undergo character reformation, can we see anything with this new
spiritual-natural capacity (see Section xx). This requires the positive bias and
theistic psychology.
There remains a logical puzzle about the
Incarnation Event. The New Testament Sacred Scripture records few biographical
facts about God's life on earth as a citizen of the Ancient Holy Land. Almost
all the facts reported about Him are external, belonging to His social and
political life. Almost nothing is recorded about His state of mind, what He
thought of as a Divine Man on earth, or what He was busy doing in the universe
while He was growing up as a Divine Child. But these biographical facts about
God's inner life while on earth are revealed in the correspondential sense of
the Old Testament Sacred Scripture, written hundreds of years prior to the
Incarnation Event! For instance, the Psalms of David, one of the
Books of the Old Testament Sacred Scripture, records the thoughts and feelings
that King David had when he was stressed under attack from his political enemies
from whom he was forced to flee for awhile.
By Divine Providence David was allowed to
think, compose, and write down only those thoughts and emotions, that
corresponded to what the Divine Child would undergo mentally when stressed under
the attack of the hells. And similarly with the histories of the the patriarchs
and their families that make up a large portion of the Book of Genesis in the
Old Testament Sacred Scripture. Every recorded detail fits by correspondence all
the developmental stages that the Divine Child went through in order to create
the new human organ called the interior-natural organ within the conscious
natural mind (see Section xx). This new creation was one of the central purposes
for God's Incarnation, as explained above.
So we have all these biographical details of
the thoughts and feelings of the Divine Child during the Incarnation Event. So
the puzzle is this: What explains the strange history of God, portrayed as a
political problem to the authorities of the land and was put to death by them at
age 33? What happened to God on earth so that these events could befall Him?
After all He was God, and so He was still omnipotent and running all things in
the universe. He was of course running the details of His Own Incarnation. He
was running the minds of the authorities who tried and condemned Him, and He was
running the Roman soldiers who executed Him.
After the execution and His death, He
caused Himself to be resuscitated in His physical or natural body.
This was a unique event in the history of the
human race. God the Divine Human was now equipped with a Natural Body, born and
grown on earth in time-space, in history and science. God's relationship to the
human race took a whole new turn, that was not possible before. Now God could be
seen in the conscious awareness of the natural mind. It is easy to picture and
see in one's mind the event of God as a Man with a Natural Body, a Face, Hands,
Feet, Heart, Lungs, Liver, etc. God was always in the Human Form, as explained
above, but now in addition to the mental human form, God acquired the natural
human form.
Note carefully this detail: human beings do
not resuscitate in the physical body.
We resuscitate in the mental body in the
afterlife of eternity (see Section xx). The physical body or corpse,
disintegrates. But with Himself, God caused His resuscitation with the physical
body. Swedenborg confirms that He often saw God's Natural Body in eternity , and
in fact, we will all be able to confirm this with our own observation when we
are resuscitated. All those who were in their heaven in eternity could also see
God's Natural Body there.
God's Natural Body in eternity is not physical
but substantial. This is described and explained under the topic of
"glorification" (see Section xx).
Note that without the idea of God's Natural
Body born on this earth it is not possible to picture God in any way since He is
infinite and we cannot picture something that is not in the human form. The
religions based on the Old Testament Sacred Scripture, including the Koran
Sacred Scripture, created the rule that it is not permitted to picture God in
human form. And this is understandable for it is not possible to picture an
infinite God who is not in the human form. Now if you allow the Incarnation
Event as part of theistic psychology, it is permitted to picture God in the
human form. Now we know what God looks like in the Natural Form, namely like we
do. And this is why it is said in Sacred Scripture that we were created in God's
Image and Likeness.
So by creating a Natural Body for Himself God
changed His relationship to the human race. In this way He repaired the loss
suffered by the race called the Fall (see above). The race had already
completed the celestial and spiritual layers of the mental world of eternity,
and now it was necessary to complete the last layer called the spiritual-natural
or interior-natural layer of the mental world. This required that God obtain for
Himself a Natural Body on earth.
The sad and ignominious details of God's short
life on earth was constructed by God for the sake of correspondences. In Sacred
Scripture God's incarnation is called "the Word made flesh" (as discussed
above). He is Divine Speech, He is Divine Truth, He is Sacred Scripture or "the
Word." Written Sacred Scripture had been given to people since the Fall, but
with the rise of materialistic thinking people lost the spiritual meaning of
Sacred Scripture and interpreted all its meanings with materialistic ideas. For
instance, they pictured the afterlife as happening here in the physical world.
They rejected the idea of an afterlife in mental eternity. They could not
comprehend such a thing.
As a result, they reinterpreted Sacred
Scripture to suit their pet philosophies and political lifestyles. Hence Sacred
Scripture lost all its spiritual value and it became useless for the purpose of
preparing oneself for a life in eternity. In other words, they "killed the
Word." Since God was "the Word" or Sacred Scripture, He enacted in
physical life by correspondence, what people had done to Sacred Scripture over
the generations. They perverted Sacred Scripture for their political gain, thus
killing God in their own mind. When God incarnated, He created those details in
His biography on earth that corresponded and represented the details of how
Sacred Scripture was killed in the minds of people.
Henceforth people would no longer be able to
kill Sacred Scripture in their mind because it is now known in history and
science that God is a Man, and that His Divine Speech is Sacred Scripture. The
human race is now on a permanent rise in evolution so that any individual
regardless of cultural or religious background, can have a living relationship
with God the Divine Human born on this earth. In theistic psychology this living
relationship is called the Divine Psychologist (see Section xx).
It is important to have a rational
understanding of God (see Section xx). This understanding requires knowing about
correspondences, that is, knowing how God has formed all things in discrete
non-overlapping layers of existence. The only connection between the layers is
that they operate together by correspondences. The layers have no independent
existence of functioning. It is that the human mind, or the world of
eternity, was created by God in corresponding layers so that all the layers
react to each other as cause and effect. In this way the entire creation is held
together as one in God's Mind.
Further, you need to remember the distinction
between "God as He is in Himself" and "God as He is Outside of Himself" (see
Section xx). God as He is in Himself is changeless from eternity to eternity, is
infinite, incomprehensible, and cannot be approached directly. Because of this,
God created the mental world of eternity, and then the physical world of time
linked to it by correspondences. God's creative activities are rational and
developmental. When the human mental world evolved sufficiently in the course of
numerous generations, it reached a phase where God could reveal Himself in a
Natural Body taken up from earth. So God made Himself be born a Divine Child in
the land that had been entrusted by Him centuries before, to study and protect
the Old Testament Sacred Scripture. This Sacred Scripture was a theistic
psychology textbook on what the Divine Child is going to do, what thoughts He is
going to have, and how He is going to change the psychobiology of the mental
world in eternity. Every human being past, present, and future will therefore be
directly affected by this change.
God's Natural Body is Divine because it is
made of Divine substances. All the substances of earth or matter that formed His
inherited physical body had been replaced by the death and resurrection process.
Now God had a Divine Natural Body along with His Divine Natural Mind He
constructed for Himself on earth. This is the Body that can now be seen by
anyone from the spiritual and celestial layers of their mind (see Section xx).
But it is necessary to think of this Natural
Body as Divine, and therefore infinite. This is a difficult idea to comprehend
rationally and without the idea of space, time, or place (see Section xx).
God's Natural Body can be seen by anyone,
regardless of where they are or which way they turn. Swedenborg confirmed this
amazing phenomenon. He observed with the people who live in the third heaven or
celestial mind, that whichever way they turn turn or face, the Spiritual Sun in
which God's Natural Body appears, remains in front of them at the same altitude
of height on the horizon, and, equally brilliant in light. God can now appear in
this Natural Body in every individual's mind. This is why the Incarnation Event
had to happen. This Divine Human Natural Body is in every place but apart from
space (see Section xx). It is therefore omnipresent. That is, God the Divine
Human is omnipresent and omnipotent in this Divine Human Natural Body.
1.1.4.1.1.1 Completion of the
Creation of the Human Race
The Writings Sacred Scripture reveal many
historical and scientific details about the earlier stage of evolution of the
human race called the celestial race (or "Most Ancient Church"). We are
part of the subsequent phase of evolution called the spiritual race, that
started with "the Fall." Compared to the celestial human race we are called a
"fall" because the spiritual character is lower than the celestial character in
the human mind. When our consciousness is in the celestial mind, our human
potentials are incomparably greater and more wonderful, than the potentials we
have in the spiritual layer of our mind. Right now, in the consciousness of our
natural mind here on earth, we function incomparably lower in potential than we
do in our spiritual mind. See the
Layers Diagram.
Nevertheless there is an immense difference
between the natural mind when it is ordered by the celestial mind, in comparison
to the natural mind when it is ordered by the spiritual mind.
With the generations of the celestial
race on earth, the natural mind was the foundation and basis for the celestial
mind. When this is the case, the natural mind is angelic and the physical
environment on earth is a paradise, since the physical is a reflection of the
mental. In the course of time and further evolutionary changes, this celestial
human race died out on earth, though not of course in their eternal habitations
in heaven, where they were visited by Swedenborg in the eighteenth century. But
after the Fall, the spiritual race began out of a few transitional people from
the celestial race.
With the Fall, paradise earth started changing
to reflect the mental character of the spiritual race. You know what that
character is, since we are part of that spiritual race of humanity. We are a
mixture of heaven and hell so that we alternate between heavenly traits and
hellish traits. For instance, one minute we are happy and having a good time,
the next minute someone insults us, and we feel like hell. Or, one minute two
people are happy and nice with each other, and the next minute they start
disagreeing, fighting, and injuring each other. One minute we steal something
when no one is looking, the next minute we buy someone a birthday present. One
minute a child is happy, agreeable, cooperative, and the next minute the child
is throwing a temper tantrum and breaking things.
So we are a mixture of heaven and hell in our
mind while we are here on earth. So now the question arises: How is the
spiritual race being regenerated by God so that we can prepare for heaven in
eternity? Since we are a mixture of heaven and hell, how do we make sure that
heaven prevails, and not hell, when we are resuscitated? This is where the
Incarnation Event comes in.
In the era of the celestial race on earth, the
environment was a paradise in reflection of the peaceful and spiritual love they
all felt for each other as human beings. After the Fall, the spiritual race had
a ferocious character when hellish, and a peaceful character when heavenly. To
reflect this ambivalence, the physical environment split into diverse zones and
climates, some extreme, harsh, and inimical to survival, reflecting the hellish
traits, and some favorable and moderate, reflecting the heavenly traits.
Poisonous species of animals and plants, and natural disasters reflect the
spiritual race's hellish traits. Useful animals and plants, and the beauty of
nature, reflect their heavenly traits.
God manages the spiritual race's regeneration
on earth by means of Sacred Scripture. Every civilization and tribe in the
spiritual race has received some form of oral or written revelation. These
revelations contain spiritual truths. When these are memorized and rationally
understood, it elevates the mentality and consciousness of the individual. With
the reasoning process based on truths from revelation, people of the spiritual
race are able to look objectively at their hellish traits, to identify them, to
condemn them, to resist them, and finally, to get rid of them so that the
hellish traits are no longer loved and enjoyed, but the opposite. This is the
sole method by which God regenerates the spiritual race.
This process worked for many generations until
people began to deliberately falsify the truths in revelation. They taught the
people to acquire a form of relationship to God called blind faith.
Instead of studying the sacred texts of revelation, the people turned to
interpretations of revelation written by various people who wanted to exploit
them for their own gain. As a result, a diverse religious culture of blind faith
evolved throughout earth and the rational understanding of God was no longer
honored or valued. This brought about an evolutionary crisis in the spiritual
race on earth. Because the truths of Sacred Scripture were cut off from the
people, they were no longer able to be regenerated by God.
At that point in time, God entered the
physical world. The instant that God was born as s Divine Child and citizen
of a country on earth, everything about the universe and the human race was
forever altered in a most profound way.
Until that instant, no one of the human
race, either in eternity or on any of the countless earths in the universe, was
able to form a direct substantive idea of God, but only an indirect abstract
idea. The instant that the Divine Child was born, everyone in the human race,
past and future, would be able to form a direct and substantive idea of God.
Until barely two thousand years ago, when the
Incarnation Event occurred on this planet, it was impossible for the human race
to see God sensuously, or to form a sensuous image of God. The Writings Sacred
Scripture tell us that the most ancient generations on this earth, called the
celestial race (see Section xx), some of whom Swedenborg interviewed in their
eternity, had from revelation, the idea of God as a Divine Human or God Man.
They were unable to see this Divine Human Man, but they knew from revelation
that one day they will be able to see God directly, when He incarnates, and they
looked forward to that experience. At last, two thousand years ago, they
suddenly were able to see the Divine Human Himself.
God does appear indirectly in all Sacred
Scripture as a Divine Man since God refers to Himself by "I" and by a Name,
talks about His hopes and loves for human beings, tells us He "hates sin," etc.
So the omnipotent God, who is the Creator and Manager of the universe, is a
Divine Person, with feelings and thoughts, thus with affective and cognitive
organs. In the Old Testament Sacred Scripture written thousands of years before
the Incarnation event, there are passages describing encounters between God and
human beings. Each time God appears to the person, not as Himself, but through
representation by another human being. People's spiritual mind was made
conscious for a few minutes, and they were able to see "angels" or people who
already live in their heavenly eternity. But no one could see God because God
was not yet visible, that is, did not yet acquire a physical or natural body.
Since God was not visible, He had to act
through the mind of intermediaries, namely "angels" which a word in Hebrew
meaning "messenger of God." This worked well while people were willing to listen
to and obey God through His intermediaries. Eventually, people drifted into
selfishness and started thinking and enjoying acting contrary to God's order and
harmony in their mind. The result was the activation of the hells in the human
mind or mental world. This is called the Fall of the race on this earth (see
Section xx). Once hellish traits and enjoyments were passed on by inheritance,
God had to create new conditions in the mental world of humanity that would
allow people to inhibit and suppress their hellish traits.
This new evolutionary condition was the
direct presence of God in our conscious natural mind. The Incarnation Event
accomplished this.
The construction of a new physiological organ
in the natural mind of humanity gave this new ability to every human being --
namely, the ability to see God, to form a concrete picture upon which we can
base our concept and knowledge and love. By loving this new presence of God in
our mind as a Divine Natural Man, we are able to operationalize the new
spiritual-natural organ, to make it fully functional in our mind, and thus to
see God as reality. From this seeing, we derive new powers to suppress and
separate from ourselves the hellish traits we inherited or acquired. This
process is called regeneration (see Section xx). From now on every individual,
regardless of knowledge or religion or culture, has the power to be good by
opposing the bads in oneself, and thereby, effective prepare a mind that can
live in an eternal conjugial heaven (see Section xx).
The immensity of this difference, achieved in
one instant of existence, is somewhat like the difference between a paradisal
garden and a burning inferno, or like the difference between a fleet of new cars
in perfect running condition and a heap of rusted metals in a cemetery for
discarded cars. This immense and incomparable difference is reflected by the
human race before the Incarnation Event and the after. It is the difference
caused by an indirect abstract idea of God versus a direct substantive idea of
God.
How can this be explained rationally and
scientifically?
Remember that there is only one mental world
(see Section xx). So when God incarnated as man in a physical body, His thoughts
and feelings as the Divine Child occurred in this one mental world of humanity.
This Divine Child was able to go through and alternate between two mental states
called "humiliation / exinanition" and "glorification / Divine." The text of the
New Testament Sacred Scripture records various historical and biographical
events about the Divine Man that portray these two states He went through. While
the Divine Human natural man was in a state of humiliation, He was in a schizoid
state, knowing He was God, but unable to feel Divine power and omniscience.
While in this mental state, God Man was able to descend to the hells in Him,
that He inherited through the virgin birth by an ordinary and preselected woman.
This woman also inherited the hells from her parents, and passed it on in the
birth of the Divine Child. Now the Divine Child was able to face these hells in
Himself.
This was a most momentous event in the history
of human evolution. Remember that there is only one mental world, so the hells
that God Man faced and battled in Himself, were just the same hells as every
individual is connected with and has to battle in order not to end up with them
in eternity. What weapons did God Man use, in His states of humiliation, to
fight the hells in the human mind?
He used spiritual truths from the Old
Testament Sacred Scripture, which are books He was given to study as a young boy
raised in the Jewish-Israeli culture. As a young Child of three or four, He was
able to reveal to Himself from His Divinity and omniscience, who He was, and
what His mission was. This information and knowledge lay hidden in the
correspondential sense of the Old Testament Sacred Scripture and no one could
decipher it except Him, from His omniscience during his states of glorification.
God could not attack the hells as God, for to
do so would be to destroy those people, which He would never do. As a result,
the hells were getting more and more emboldened and powerful in their
enslavement of people everywhere. From birth people inherited a connection to
them, and people were unwilling or unable to cut off their connection to the
hells. This changed when the Divine Child ordered and contained the human hells
in His mind in His states of humiliation. When He faced the hells down He did
not hurt them, but only restricted them, restricted their sphere of influence on
human beings who were on earth and connected to them by inheritance.
You can see now rationally why God had to
incarnate in the natural world in history and reality. It was to put Himself in
a state of humiliation that limits His omnipotence and omniscience. In this
weakened, less than Divine state, He was able to face down the hells He
inherited, thus all the hells in the human mental world of eternity. Once He did
this, God Man's mission was ended. He had created a new mental organ, called the
spiritual-natural organ, and this organ was now present in the mental world of
humanity, thus in every individual. Now every person could see God
consciously in the natural mind. With this new concrete knowledge of God, we are
able to face down our own inherited connections to the hells.
Through this new creation by God Man in
Himself, the human hells will never again invade the mind of every individual
born in time. For instance, you and me are born with a connection to our hells
in our mind. We know this from self-witnessing our feelings and thoughts all day
long. We can see that we possess hatred for others and selfishness for ourselves
that lead us to a life of misery -- conflict, depression, lack of motivation and
energy, enslavement to hurtful pleasures and addictions, failed relationships,
etc. All this human misery is caused by our connections to the hells. Then,
after we are resuscitated, we are right back in the hells of our mind. All sorts
of people suddenly come around and try to seduce us and incite us to go with
them and explore hell. Those who do, ultimately end up there, having zero
motivation to exit, hence remaining in hell forever. What a miserable fate!
But we can now fight successfully against this
process of the Fall of humanity. Now we have God the Divine Human concretely in
the conscious awareness of our natural mind. Now we can make use of this image
and certainty of knowledge, to read Sacred Scripture and extract from it
spiritual truths that we apply to our daily willing and thinking (see Section xx).
So now we can go through this process of fighting and overcoming our connections
to hell in our mind. This is called "being saved" since it saves us from having
to live in hell forever. What a relief!
In its literal sense the Old Testament Sacred
Scripture presents an indirect abstract revelation of God, while the New
Testament Sacred Scripture presents a direct substantive revelation of God. The
collection of sacred books that make up the Old Testament Sacred Scripture were
all written hundred of years prior to the Incarnation Event. The collection of
sacred books that make up the New Testament Sacred Scripture was written after
the Incarnation Event. So you can see why the Old Testament Sacred Scripture
must necessarily present an indirect abstract understanding of God, while the
New Testament Sacred Scripture is able to present a direct and substantive
relationship with God. Even more so, the Writings Sacred Scripture are able to
give a substantive view of God because it is written through the mind of
Swedenborg, a modern scientist with a modern perspective on the universe. The
most advanced and substantive definition of God is possible in theistic
psychology, which is based on the correspondential sense of Sacred Scripture.
A scientific or rational definition and
explanation of God is the most concrete and particuylar relationship human
beings can have with God. (See Section xx).
It took the Incarnation Event 18 centuries to
complete itself -- from 1 AD to 1771 AD when the last book of the Writings
Sacred Scripture was published by Swedenborg.
It takes some knowledge of mental anatomy and
physiology to be able to explain rationally the evolutionary difference between
BC and AD dates. The Incarnation Event marks the switch in calendar from "BC"
("Before the Christian Era") to "AD" ("After the Christian Era"). Historically,
in the literal sense of the New Testament Sacred Scripture, the Incarnation
Event is contextualized as a Christian religious event that occurred within the
Jewish religion, which for many centuries had had historical possession of the
Old Testament Sacred Scripture.
But the Writings Sacred Scripture prove
that the correspondential sense of the Old Testament Sacred Scripture is
theistic psychology, and likewise, that the correspondential sense of the New
Testament Sacred Scripture is the same theistic psychology, continued where the
other left off.
By studying theistic psychology you are in
fact studying the correspondential sense of Sacred Scripture given in prior
centuries of revelation.
When the truths of the Old Testament Sacred
Scripture were falsified, and thus rendered inoperative for regeneration, the
New Testament Sacred Scripture was given. Now God was revealed in a different
relationship to the human race. Prior to God's embodiment or incarnation, God
did not exist on the plane of the natural world, and hence, the natural mind
where we are conscious here on earth. This was equally true in the heavenly
layers of eternity were countless number of humanity had congregated from the
endless earths in the universe (see Section xx). No one in heaven was able to
see God!
God did not exist for humanity at the
sensorimotor level of perception or visualization. The closest human beings were
able to imagine God is to think of God like themselves. Some people imagined
that God was an immense giant. Others imagined that God was not localized in one
place, so could not be a person like we are. Others were afraid to imagine God
because their religious beliefs made it a taboo to try to picture God. All
these imagined ideas about God are called abstract because they are not real.
They are made up constructions with one's imagination.
What happens when it comes to fighting our
hellish traits using as a crutch this abstract, empty conception of God?
For many generations the answer was believed
to be offering animal sacrifices to this abstract God, to appease the forces of
vengeance for braking the commandments. This was accompanied later with the
performance of elaborate worship rituals. Sacrifices and rituals were two ways
in which people tried to strengthen their idea and relationship to a silent
indivisible God. This was a dangerous God, sometimes vengeful and always scary
and unknown and unknowable, hence inapproachable. This was the abstract idea
people have of God when it is based solely on the Old Testament Sacred Scripture
in its literal sense.
In contrast, the New Testament Sacred
Scripture no longer presents an abstract or general idea of an invisible and
incomprehensible God, but points the fingerprints and birth certificate of a
man, saying this is God. This is the furthest you can be from an abstract idea
of God. This is a new reality, a new condition. God has entered history, and
therefore science. That God entered history was acknowledged immediately by many
h people, but that God entered science had to await the revelations of the
Writings Sacred Scripture 18 centuries later. The New Testament Sacred Scripture
could not exist without the Incarnation Event since it is the story and
explanation of it. The Writings Sacred Scripture could not exist without the New
Testament Sacred Scripture and the Old Testament Sacred Scripture since the
Writings derive all their topics from the earlier two revelations. The three
together, in their correspondential sense, constitute one coherent
rational series called theistic psychology.
When we have a substantive idea of God as a
real person in history and science, we are prepared to undergo regeneration,
thus, preparation for our eternal life in conjugial heaven. God can
regenerate us and prepare us for heaven only to the extent that we are willing
to cooperate. The psychology of cooperation with God is the most important
and critical reason for studying theistic psychology (see Section xx).
God regenerates our character from hellish to
heavenly, by arranging our daily life to present particular challenges that we
are to handle and overcome. In these challenges we are faced with temptations
(see Section xx). People believe that God "tests" them with calamities to
strengthen their character and their faith in God. This theme recurs in the
literal sense of the Old Testament Sacred Scripture. However, in the
correspondential sense of these themes, we are actually being informed about how
temptations work.
The first step in the process is for
God to bring spiritual truths to your attention, expecting you to memorize them,
reflect on them, understand them, make them the basis of your thinking and
reasoning. This first step is called reformation of your thinking and
reasoning with regards to God's role in your daily life. Now you are equipped
with spiritual truths that are in your thinking and reasoning.
The second step is for God to bring
things to your attention in your willing, thinking, and doing. For instance, you
may lose something you are attached to. This suddenly exposes you to the
temptation of enjoying and expressing hellish traits: e.g., blaming somebody,
breaking something in anger, being in a bad mood and making friends suffer, etc.
These are inherited hellish traits that are called forth from your character.
God arranges for these types of experiential challenges on a minute by minute
basis, or a second by second basis, from your birth to your endless eternity.
The third step is for you to face the
temptation with the spiritual truths already in your understanding and reasoning
process from step 1. You have to talk yourself so that you are willing to
inhibit the hellish reactions because they are contrary to your heaven in
eternity.
The fourth step is for God to
immediately remove the challenge. You suddenly realize that you have victory in
your spiritual combat. God gives you a feeling of heavenly peace and closeness
to Him. You are now prepared to repeat step 1. After victory God enlightens you
so that now you can see deeper spiritual truths. As a result, God can now bring
you to face still more spiritual and even celestial temptations. When you are
resuscitated, your are immediately ready for the second death, during which you
shed all contact with any remaining hellish traits. This elevates you to your
conjugial heaven.
These four steps of regeneration can best work
when people have a direct and substantive idea of God. In contrast, abstract or
indirect ideas of God allow types of reasonings about God that are not
spiritual, but natural. Our relationship to God, instead of being based on
rational understanding, is based on blind faith. This means that they accept
the literal sense of Sacred Scripture without inquiring into its
correspondential sense. The problem with this is that various people at
various times present their imaginative ideas and interpretations of what the
literal sense means. This kind of confusion is possible because of the abstract
idea of God. This kind of idea limits God's ability to enlighten the person.
Hence there are limits to how much God can regenerate that person. But when
one's idea of God is direct and substantive, that is, historical and scientific,
then God's ability to regenerate us is effective and thorough.
Swedenborg reports that after resuscitation
every human being is instructed in various ways about the spiritual truths in
Sacred Scripture. People are are then either willing or unwilling, to receive
this instruction, to examine it and understand it rationally. Those who are
willing, are enlightened and they are able to see spiritual truths. Now God can
elevate them to heavenly life. But those who are unwilling to examine and
receive the instruction, are at liberty to go off and live their new life.
Through a series of experiences they are stripped from their social and
philosophical pretenses, and nothing is left except what is fully compatible to
their ruling love and willing to be in its service. The person now becomes
a caricature of the former self, since anything that is heavenly is gone, and
what's left is something partly human and insane.
An abstract idea of God is not real. It is
empty or spurious. It does not last in eternity.
The recognition is now beginning in
twenty-first century science that a substantive definition of God makes it into
a scientific concept (see substantive dualism, Section xx).
Quoting from the Writings Sacred Scripture:
SE 374. CONCERNING HELL AND THE CRUELTY OF
THE INFERNAL CREW
What the cruelty of the infernal crew is like can never be described; they act
from phantasies in the most hostile manner against others upon whom they
exercise such cruelties that if they were to be described they would horrify.
For if they could exercise cruelties according to their phantasies, their
butcheries would be even more cruel than those of the most ferocious wild
beasts. By their phantasies they as it were bring forth axes and instruments
of death, and unless God Messiah subdued their savagery, those whom they
intend to torment would also have the most cruel sensation. For such is the
power of phantasies amongst souls that they can induce a sensation as though
it were corporeal, thus likewise torments. God Messiah removes those
sensations; indeed He takes away the instruments of death from the infernal
crew. In a word, these cruelties are more horrifying than one can ever
believe. The human race, which is worse than the most ferocious wild beasts,
would have exercised such cruelties unless God Messiah had saved them and
redeemed them, and thus He continually liberates them from infernal
punishments. 1747, Dec. 21.
The expression "God Messiah" refers to the
Incarnated Divine Human. This passage in the literal sense discusses the
historical situation of human civilization on earth when people became connected
by inherited genes to the hells in the mental world. These hells are made of
savage and cruel feelings with which people carry out their unspeakable
fantasies in torturing anyone whom they can capture with their persuasive
reasonings (remember Pinocchio?). To prevent people from believing these fantasy
persuasions and falling under their cruel spell, God the Divine Human had to
battle them and subdue them -- without destroying them since they were human and
God never abandons any human but looks after each from birth to eternal
immortality. God had to present Himself as He is Outside of Himself in a state
of mere human weakness, rather than as the Divine Human Himself. God removed
contact between His Divine Human and His mere human on earth so that the mere
human on earth no felt weak and had to rely on His own self-intelligence to
combat these spirits of fantasy and cruelty in the mental world.
Nothing in the mental world can be destroyed
since everything in it is immortal. But people in their spiritual body of
immortality can be restricted by God the Divine Human under appropriate
conditions without hurting their human freedom to remain where they are if they
so choose. So people who are conscious within these feelings and fantasies of
cruelty, and love them so much they refuse to back out of them, can be
restricted but not by God in His Divine Infinite Power, but my the mere human
born in time, history, and science two thousand years ago. This mere human is
called "the Messiah" in the Old and New Testament Sacred Scriptures. Long before
the birth of the Messiah occurred in history the event was foretold by
revelation in the Old Testament Sacred Scripture, and in Sacred Scripture prior
to that. So God revealed in Divine Speech to the human race that He would be
born in time and history as a mere human who contained from within His Infinite
Human. It was also foretold that He would confront the hells in the mental world
of humanity and that He would restrict or confine to mental prison houses those
people who live in the hellish feelings and enjoyments. In this way they would
no longer be able to attack and ensnare and mislead others who now could be
"saved" for life in their heavenly feelings and enjoyments.
In His lower mental states as a mere human,
God Messiah could face all the human hells in their endless variety and engage
them in mental combat, and defeat them at their own games. The price of God's
victory is the containment of all those in the hells of their mind from being
able of influencing and ensnaring the rest of humanity. From then on, once they
had been imprisoned in mental hells, they were no longer able to influence
anyone except those people on earth with whom God connected them under His
watchful eye. God as the Divine Psychologist in every person's mind or life,
connects and disconnects the hells and the heavens moment by moment as each of
us lives our daily round activities every day. For example, we might be tempted
to cheat even though we know it's wrong. Or, we might be tempted to discriminate
unfairly against someone. Or, we might break a promise when it's convenient.
Etc. It is the Divine Psychologist who engineers these events to serve as
temptations. Each temptation gives us one more opportunity to reject the hellish
and to choose the heavenly. The more such choices we exercise the more we are
establishing our own future in eternity to be heavenly. This freedom to choose
is called "salvation" in Sacred Scripture.
We have this freedom to choose ever
since the Divine Human on earth battled and confined all hellish feelings into
mental prison houses where they cannot influence others except when allowed
specifically by the Divine Psychologist. When we are to undergo a temptation,
the Divine Psychologist releases some of the people from their hellish prison
houses and they are allowed to access once more their natural mind. From this
state they influence the individual on earth undergoing temptation in their
natural mind. At the same time the Divine Psychologist releases people from
their heaven back into their natural mind and from that state they influence the
individual undergoing a temptation. The people from hell think and desire to
cheat, and this state influences by correspondence what the individual in
temptation is thinking and feeling (e.g., thinking that it's all right to cheat
because of various reasons that occur). At the same time what the people from
heaven are thinking and intending influences the individual in temptation, which
by correspondence brings thoughts and feelings that cheating is wrong. In this
way the Divine Psychologist keeps the individual in perfect balance between
heaven and hell, thus providing the individual with a true free choice.
This process does not work when the individual
is not capable of reasoning clearly due to mental impairment which might be due
to ill health or injury. For instance, when people are sick they get so scared
that they are ready to repent and make resolutions to be good from then on.
However when they recover they forget about the resolutions and revert to their
former lifestyle of enjoying hellish traits and not wanting to fight against
them in temptations. When people on earth are sick or scared or fear for their
life they fall under the persuasive influence of people from hell whose
way is to fake one's repentance so that they can influence God or fate, but
inwardly have no intention of following it.
These temptation battles were not possible
prior to the incarnation of God Messiah and His accomplishment of restricting
and confining all the human hells to mental prison houses from where they could
no longer mislead people on earth through their natural mind -- except under the
controlled and watchful eye of the Divine Psychologist.
Quoting from the Writings Sacred Scripture:
Life 63. A religious persuasion has
prevailed that no one can fulfill the Law; and the Law is, not to kill, not to
commit adultery, not to steal, and not to bear false witness. Every civil and
moral man can fulfil these precepts of the Law from civil and moral life; but
that he can fulfill them from spiritual life this religious persuasion denies.
Thus it follows that his abstinence from doing these evils is merely to avoid
punishments and losses in the world, and not to avoid punishments and losses
after he has left the world. Hence it is that the man with whom the
above-mentioned religious persuasion prevails, thinks these evils lawful in
the sight of God, but unlawful in the sight of the world.
[2] On account of this thought, from this religious persuasion of his, the man
is in the lust of all these evils, and only refrains from doing them on
account of the world. Such a man, therefore, after death, although he had not
committed murder, adultery, theft and false witness, still lusts to do them;
and further, he does them when the external which he had in the world is taken
away from him. Every lust remains with man after death. Hence it is that such
persons act in unity with hell, and cannot but have their lot with those who
are in hell.
[3] Another lot, however, awaits those who, because to do these things is
against God, do not will to kill, to commit adultery, to steal and to bear
false witness. After some combat against these evils they do not will them,
and consequently they do not lust to do them, saying in their hearts that they
are sins, in themselves infernal and diabolical. These, after death, when the
external which they had for use in the world is taken away from them, act in
unity with heaven; and because they are in the Lord, they also come into
heaven. (Life 63)
This passage explains that we need to obey the
commandments for appropriate reason or from the right motivation. If our
motivation is external or instrumental, we merely inhibit the overt performance
of the hellish traits -- to lie, to deceive, to steal, to hate, etc. This
passage tells us that people who don't break the commandments but continue to
want to break them, will break them when the external threats disappear. People
will commit the crimes if they believe they won't get punished. After
resuscitation people are no longer afraid to be punished for their deeds since
they cannot die, cannot be threatened with physical violence. As a result they
now start performing all the hellish things they were afraid to do before. But
people who acquire an inner motive for being good and loving heavenly things do
not commit these crimes after resuscitation because they have learned to shun
evils as contrary to their heavenly life.
1.1.4.1.1.2 A Brief History of God
and Humanity
See the
Layers Diagram.
1
God as He is in Himself is the Infinite Life having no
beginning, in whom infinite uncreate things make one consciousness, from whom
radiates, as from a Spiritual Sun, love substance united to truth substance,
that is, spiritual heat united to spiritual light.
2
God as He is outside of Himself has a beginning with the
act of creation. Spiritual heat and light radiate downward and outside of God as
He is in Himself. These two substances provide the infrastructure for creation.
God is omnipresent, or present in all created things, as their infrastructure
constructed out of spiritual heat substance (love, good) and spiritual light
substance (truth, rationality).
3
At the first level of creation, good substance (or
spiritual heat) and truth substance (or spiritual light) make up the mental
world of eternity, layering it in three discrete degrees called the
celestial-rational degree of the mind, the spiritual-rational degree
of the mind, and the spiritual-natural degree of the mind. All discrete
degrees are connected by the laws of correspondences which are
cause-effect relations between events in the upper layer and those in the lower
layer.
At each of the three degrees or layers, there are
created three mental organs: (i) the affective organ for the reception of
spiritual heat, which then exists in the human mind as goods, loves, virtues;
(ii) the cognitive organ for the reception of spiritual light, which then
exists as truth, intelligence, rationality; (iii) the sensorimotor organ
for the ultimation of the united affective and cognitive organs acting as one.
4
At the second level of creation, a new discrete
layer is created downward and outside and is called the natural mind (or
the world of spirits). It has three discrete sub-layers called the
natural-rational mind, the natural-sensuous mind, and the
natural-corporeal mind.
5
At the third level of creation, a new layer is
created downward and outside and is called the natural world (or physical
universe) that contains time, matter, and place.
6
At birth, every human being is made up of two portions. The
first portion is the spiritual body located in the mental world of
eternity (see Step 2). The second portion is the physical body located in the
natural world (see step 5). The physical body is connected by correspondence to
the spiritual body until death when the connection ceases. The spiritual body
then continues life in the mental world of eternity (see step 3).
7
Since there is only one mental world of eternity, the
immortal spiritual body of every human being must co-exist with each other. An
individual’s uniqueness from birth to eternity consists of the person’s unique
cumulative collection of sensations, thoughts, and feelings that are accumulated
every moment of life. This unique identity in eternity determines one’s life
environment. Feelings and thoughts that are compatible with each other cause
people to appear to each other, to be present with each other, and thus to form
spiritual dwelling communities or societies. Those whose feelings are
incompatible or oppositional are kept at a greater subjective or psychological
distance so that communication become difficult or impossible.
Spiritual societies or collectivities create a
psychological environment or intersubjectivity that is constructed out of the
interactions between the individuals. Each spiritual society in eternity is
distinguished by the characteristic feelings and thoughts of its inhabitants.
These affective and cognitive operations produce by correspondence a
sensorimotor environment of appearances that reflect the quality of the feelings
and thoughts. The result is the appearance of things resembling the places and
content of our natural mind, which is filled with the content of our experiences
through the physical body we had on earth.
As a result, the spiritual societies made of people with
feelings ordered by good and love substance in the affective organ, with
corresponding thoughts ordered by truth and rationality substance in the
cognitive organ, are called heavens. Their cities and habitations appear
palatial, pleasant, and friendly. In contrast, the spiritual societies made of
people who are distorting the inflow of spiritual heat and light in themselves,
turning them into their opposites, are called hells. Their habitations appear
dingy, unpleasant, and hostile.
8
The quality of feelings people have in eternity is
determined by the choices they themselves make when they are resuscitated, which
occurs approximately 30 hours after separation from the dead physical body. Upon
resuscitation people in eternity become visible to each other, along with the
external appearances that correspond to the quality of their feelings and
thoughts. A series of experiences or happenings then lead each person to
discover their primary inner feelings and affections (or ruling love). As they
become aware more and more of their own deep-set feelings and intentions, their
environment changes correspondingly, as they are led into a series of spiritual
societies. In this way each individual is gradually led to abandon all feelings
and thoughts that are not compatible with their ruling love. When the transition
is completed (called the second death), the individual is fully embedded on a
permanent basis in a spiritual society, which is either heavenly and receptive
of spiritual heat and light, or is hellish and distorts the inflowing spiritual
heat and light into its opposite.
The quality of life in eternity is therefore determined
entirely by one’s ruling love or affections. These adhere to each person in the
course of one’s daily feelings, thoughts, and actions while living on earth
through the temporary physical body. The first few generations of people on
earth received the inflow of good and truth without distortion. Their earthly
environment was a paradise, and they were instructed by direct communication
with their departed family members and teachers in heaven, whom they then joined
upon their own death. Later generations however introduced into themselves
feelings of selfishness and hostility towards others. They did this by
distorting the inflow of good, love, and virtue. In this way evil was introduced
into the mental world of humanity. When people with these feelings were
resuscitated, their ruling love was contrary to heavenly influx, which allowed
them to create the hellish habitations.
9
From then on with all the succeeding generations, including
us today, people grew up into adults whose ruling love was hellish. Through
these hellish traits people on earth made a unity with people in hell. This
resulted in the deterioration of life on earth – anti-sociality, crime, wars,
mental illness, unhappiness, degraded rationality and wisdom. The entire future
human race was therefore in danger of becoming hellish. At that point in
history, God Himself entered the natural world through the Incarnation Event.
During the 33 years that God was embodied in a physical body He lived life as an
ordinary citizen of a country in the Middle East, as described in the New
Testament Sacred Scripture. This did not affect God’s omnipresence and
omnipotence that God maintained as always. There was therefore a separation
between God as He is in Himself (see step 1) and God as He is outside of
Himself, and in this case, in a natural body.
While on earth with a physical body God put Himself through
two distinct mental states. The first is called a state of humiliation
(or exinanition) in which there was a separation. In this state the Incarnated
God was called the “Son of God” rather than God. But in the
Second state, which is called a state of glorification,
the Incarnated God was one with God as He is in Himself. When the Incarnated God
was in a state of glorification He produced miracles, but when He was in a state
of humiliation, He denied Himself the exercise of omnipotence, appearing as if
He was just an ordinary man.
During His states of humiliation God connected Himself to
the hells of the human race in order to create a new order for the human mind in
which the hells were counterbalanced by the heavens in each individual’s mind.
God could not accomplish this by retaining His omnipotence because this would
have destroyed the hells, consequently the human mind and the entire race. Hence
He had to incarnate and assume states of humiliation in which He limited His
omnipotence, allowing the hells to attack His mind. These attacks are called
temptations. By overcoming temptations with new truths He constructed, the
Incarnated God created the truths that would henceforth allow every human being
born on earth to also fight and defeat the hells that are inherited in the mind
of every newborn. When people grow up to be adults, they are ready to face their
hells through conscience and truths of Sacred Scripture.
By overcoming temptations we are able to disconnect our
mind from the inherited hells. Through this we are able to hate evil traits and
love heavenly traits. This will insure that at our resuscitation we will choose
to retain our virtues instead of our vices.
10
At the completion of His task on earth, the Divine Human
born in time was completely unified with Himself as God is in Himself. God now
had a totally new presence in the created universe. Prior to this moment God did
not have a sensuous presence in His creation. No one could see God or talk to
God as person to person. Humanity did not have the ability to be with God
directly, but only indirectly. Those times recorded in Sacred Scripture where
God spoke to an individual, there was always an intermediary necessary, which
was a role filled by people who were conscious in the celestial-rational mind,
which is the highest awareness possible in the mental world of eternity. These
individuals appeared to people in their natural mind so that those to whom they
appeared became conscious of them, saw them, heard them, and called them
“angels” of God. The person filling the role experienced the influx of God as a
full possession of their mind or spirit, as perhaps in some celestial trance. As
they spoke the words of God flowing into them, they subjectively felt like they
are God Himself, but this ceased as soon as the influx ceased, at which moment
they become conscious of themselves again.
This method of communication (called prophecy or visions)
was constructed by God in order to retain historical and conscious contact with
the human race prior to the Incarnation Event. But once this event was
completed, the older method of prophecy and visions ceased in order to encourage
a more direct access to God that He newly created through the acquisition of a
visible or sensuous physical body in time. And yet no sooner than He acquired
it, God took His Natural Body out of the physical world of time and into the
mental world of eternity. Since then God is directly present in the mental world
of humanity, at all the layers, including the lowest called the natural mind.
Now God is directly present in the natural mind of humanity. Every human being
living on earth in a physical body, and being conscious in a natural mind, can
have direct communication, communion, or conjunction with God in His Divine
Human. This was not possible before. The human race’s contact with God was
indirect, but now, it was direct.
11
The difference is critical in evolutionary terms because
God could not complete the creation of the mental world of eternity by
omnipotence and indirect communication. God could not be directly present in the
mind of any human being until the completion of the Incarnation Event. This was
equally true of the people who already existed in their heavens and had been
born on earth since the beginning. They too now for the first time were able to
see God with their eyes and speak to Him face to face. They knew from Sacred
Scripture that God was a Human Divine, but now they could see with their senses
that God was a Divine Human.
People now can face their inherited hellish
predispositions, turn to God the Divine Human in their conscious natural mind,
and ask for the power to overcome each hellish trait at a time. Direct
acknowledgement of God in our conscious natural mind is therefore the spiritual
weapon by which we face our selfishness and desire to rule over others. This is
the ruling love that controls and maintains in us the multitude of hellish
traits we enjoy so much that we refuse to abandon them --- being untruthful,
being cruel or uncaring, conceited, arrogant, irrational, lazy, unhealthy,
biased, misguided, and so on. We enjoy being this way, which is why people don’t
want to change themselves. At the same time we don’t enjoy heavenly traits and
we turn away from them --- being truthful, avoiding deceit or cheating, being
responsible, hard working, caring, clean, unselfish. How is it possible to
change when we love what is evil and false, and hate what is good and true? If
we do not change prior to resuscitation, it is certain that we will choose to
let go of our heaven and to seek out our hell.
12
Nothing less is needed therefore than a full rebirth of our
character and its gradual regeneration through into a new character that no
longer contains the love for evil. This cannot be done through indirect
communication with God, as in the past. It cannot be done by God’s omnipotence
and control over our mind, for we would then turn into spiritual robots, not
human beings. It can be done only through the direct conscious presence of
God the Divine Human in our natural mind.
If God made an appearance today at the Unite Nations and
addressed the planet, and then appeared in various cities around the world, He
would then be present to people consciously and directly, and sensuously. Not
rationally. The result would be that after some time people would deny that it
was God who showed up, and if He shows up again and again, people would reject
Him as not God. But if God appears to our conscious natural-rational portion of
the mind (see step 4), He remains permanently and can bring us to heavenly life
after resuscitation.
Direct presence of God in our conscious natural-rational
mind begins when we acknowledge God the Divine Human as being omnipresent and
omnipotent, and one with God as He is in Himself (see step 1). This
acknowledgement must be made rationally, not sensuously, not persuasively, not
by authority, not by rote memory or repetition. We must acquire for ourselves an
actual living and direct relationship with God the Divine Human who is present
in every mind and fills the mental world of eternity with spiritual heat (love,
good) and spiritual light (truth, rationality).
Once this rational acknowledgement is made with full and
clear understanding of God, we have the opportunity to form a relationship,
which is done day by day, hour by hour, as we proceed with our daily round of
activities. We strive to think and act in the presence of God. We must keep
track or monitor the flow of our thoughts, feelings, emotions, actions, and
effects on others and society. This is called self-witnessing our life.
From conscience and from Sacred Scripture we have principles that allow us to
judge what we feel, what we think, and what we do that affects others. Any
feeling, thought, or act that is contrary to conscience or Sacred Scripture must
be condemned, banished, and held in aversion as a sin against God the Divine
Human who creates our heaven.
13
This cannot be done without struggle. We must fight as of
self, but in the presence of God. We fight by thinking against the evil in
ourselves that our self-witnessing reveals. One by one, feeling by feeling,
thought by thought, we fight all our life every day and hour. God the Divine
Human is present and does all the work of overpowering the hells and
disconnecting our mind from it. After each combat and victory, God gives us a
“Sabbath” rest or peace of mind like that of heaven. Then another fight begins.
This goes on till the end of life here.
When we acknowledge the conscious direct presence of God
the Divine Human in our natural-rational ideas of Him, we are kept in a state of
freedom to choose good or evil, truth or falsified truth. Without this conscious
acknowledgment of Him, God is still able to influence us indirectly and thus to
help us develop morality of life through conscience and external education and
socialization (See Section 7.0.4.1). This natural morality is an essential component of civilized
life. But it is not sufficient to penetrate deeply enough to influence our
ruling love. Although we may act morally all our life yet when we are
resuscitated and shed off all external constraints of compliance and obedience,
we are no longer motivated to act morally. In that case we are also unmotivated
to acquire spiritual truths about heaven. We turn to our hellish traits and
delight in them with like-minded companions.
But when we understand God rationally and acknowledge Him
in our mind and life, we are able to face spiritual temptations through the
truths that God reveals to us in Sacred Scripture and in conscience. As we then
face our evil enjoyments, condemning them as a sin against God and heaven, we
are then given victory by God through His omnipotence. We are able to withhold
ourselves from continuing to love and repeat the evil acts, thoughts, and
feelings. We then have spiritual freedom. Prior to that we have natural freedom,
but not spiritual.
14
Theistic psychology is the science of regeneration
extracted from Sacred Scripture. All Sacred Scripture is Divine Speech in
correspondences. Divine Speech, which is Divine Truth (or spiritual light),
flows into the celestial-rational level of the mental world. There it appears as
written Sacred Scripture in the language we all speak innately when in that
mental state or layer. This visible Sacred Scripture is written in
celestial-rational correspondences of Divine Speech. This is the layer that
humanity is wisest and is able to understand Divine rational things about good,
love, truth and wisdom.
Then another version of Sacred Scripture appears in the
spiritual-rational layer of the mental world. This is written in a spiritual
language that we innately possess when conscious in the spiritual-rational layer
of the human mind. A still different version appears in the spiritual-natural
layer, and finally a still different version that appears in our natural mind
here on earth as we read Sacred Scripture in one or another natural language.
The four layers of Sacred Scripture exactly correspond to each other, but at
successively lower levels of rationality. Theistic psychology gives us the
knowledge of how to climb up this ladder of rationality with our conscious
awareness. When we extract spiritual-natural correspondences and
spiritual-rational correspondences form Sacred Scripture, we are in effect
climbing up as to consciousness, to our natural and spiritual heavens in
eternity.
15
There is a new medical field of
research today called neuro-theology. It is based on initial research with a few
subjects from different religions showing that when they are praying with
intense focus, certain areas of their brain “light up” on the computer screen
that shows color maps of their brain being monitored by digital imaging
techniques. Hence there may be a correlation between mental activity and brain
activity. Logically there ought to be a different brain activity configuration
for every unique mental state.
From this correlation a few
scientists and news reporters have drawn an amazing conclusion, namely, that
certain people are biologically programmed or wired to be religious, to have
faith, to pray, to believe in God. This would then explain why there are
religions, why some people believe in God while others do not. This astonishing
conclusion is illogical. A mere correlation between mental and brain activity is
turned into a cause effect relation, and this in the wrong direction. Our mental
activity in eternity are spiritual causes that act by correspondence on physical
events, which are their effects in the physical world of time. When people are
praying or meditating they are in a certain mental state.
This means that their affective,
cognitive, and sensorimotor organs act jointly in correspondence with each
other. For example, we may want something that God can give us (affective
organ), we love and respect God (affective organ), we are motivated to ask God
for that thing (affective organ), we construct sentences addressed to God
(cognitive organ), we silently speak them to ourselves (sensorimotor organ).
This is praying. It is a mental activity in eternity that we do through our
spiritual body that contains our mental organs. This mental activity now
activates specific regions in the neurons of the brain that correspond to the
mental activity. Every mental activity has its own particular reflection in
neural activity and pattern.
The idea of a biological
predisposition to be religious is illogical because “to be religious” refers
to faith and praying which are mental events while “biological predisposition”
refers to physical events such as physical neurons and physical genes. The
reason these scientists and news reporters fail to see the illogic is that they
consider faith and God to be physical like neurons and genes. This negative bias
in science is called materialism. This is called a negative bias in science
because it is accepted and enforced even though it cannot be proven. Materialism
cannot be proven, hence to maintain it and require it is a formally accepted and
practiced intellectual bias.
The other option is called the
positive bias in science, as in the theistic sciences that are now being
created, like theistic psychology. Since theistic psychology cannot prove
dualism, it is called the positive bias in science. In this mode of thinking we
are born dual citizens, with a temporary physical body in time and a permanent
spiritual body in eternity. All mental events are therefore located in the
mental world of eternity and these are linked by functional correspondence to
the events in the physical body.
Traditionally, being religious and
faith in God and an afterlife were considered outside the bounds of science. But
now we have an overlap in two directions. One direction is neuro-theology and
the other direction is theistic psychology. Neuro-theology is the direction of
reductionism, that is, reducing mental to physical, which is the same as
reducing the eternal to the temporal, and also, reducing God to a human fiction
or imagination. And this after all, is biological, and hence the genes are god.
One is led to such illogic by the bias of materialism.
16
If God is omnipresent and
omnipotent why is there a hell and why do wicked people succeed in their hurtful
plans against innocent people? And why does God maintain in existence things
that hurt human beings, such as hurricanes, poisonous substances, or viruses and
bacteria? If God is perfect then why is His creation not perfect? Or is it
See the
Layers Diagram.
Yes, God maintains what He created
in a perfect order that is designed to create a heaven in eternity out of the
human race and for the human race. Heaven in eternity is the upper layer of the
human mind and the more individuals join that state of life in themselves, the
more it is that heaven evolves into a human perfection to endless eternity. What
is life in heaven like? It is not unknown. In fact nothing can be more familiar
to us than our mental states. God gives each person numerous heavenly mental
states in the course of our earthly life in the natural mind so that we may
learn to love them. These are called heavenly "remains" because God stashes them
away in places in the mind that are not conscious. thus protecting them from
corruption.
Look at babies, infants and young
children. Every moment they seem to experience the fullness and beauty of life
in an unselfconscious way, but being totally in the wonderment of life around
them. These involve feelings of wonderment, curiosity, peace, excitement, love
for parents and other infants, obedience, innocence, love of learning. These are
heavenly traits that we love as children and God collects them and saves them in
your heaven to be. Throughout life on earth we receive such moments of heavenly
impulses and loves and enjoyments. God retains every one of them and makes them
available to us in our heaven, if only we choose to raise our consciousness
there and be content doing that
And so the fact that there is
crime, evil, sickness, and war does not mean that these things hamper God's
ability to bring the individual to a desire for heaven through cultivating a
love for heavenly traits and enjoyments. This desire or love cannot be imposed
by God on an individual. Every love is an individual operation. Love does not
stick to you by glue or osmosis. A person's love is a subjective assimilation of
spiritual heat flowing into the affective organ. If the individual does not
assimilate the love from self and as-of self, it does not remain in the
individual's mind but flows away. Only the enjoyment of love binds it to the
person forever. Heavenly traits must be loved in order to have a heaven to go
to, for heaven is in your love of good and truth from God. Without loving good
and truth from God, we cannot exist in the celestial layer of our mind in
eternity since that layer is constructed out of the rational love of good and
truth we receive from God the Divine Human.
God allows only that kind of
evil that He can use to help people learn to love heavenly traits. That is God's
highest ruling love, namely, to continuously strive to help people He creates to
learn to love heavenly traits, for this alone can realize God's plan of a heaven
from the human race perfecting itself forever. In this perfect evolution of
perfection rests boundless and endless happiness for each human being. This is
God's Passion from His Divine Love and Essence.
The history of God is the
history of the human mind.
1.1.4.2
The Three Benefits of Rational Spirituality: Enlightenment,
Empowerment, Rational Ecstasy
The benefits of studying theistic psychology is the
progressive evolution and development of our rational spirituality. This is what
our heaven is constructed of. The benefits of rational spirituality are
innumerable but they fall into three major categories called enlightenment,
empowerment, and rational ecstasy.
1.1.4.2.1
Spiritual Enlightenment
Enlightenment refers to the elevation of operations in the
cognitive organ of the mind. You can see that when you first start studying a
subject or activity your cognitive operations are those of a novice or beginner.
As you gain experience and knowledge about something, your cognitive operations
become more effective and and more complex. When you reach the stage of being an
expert at something -- like a supervisor or a parent -- your cognitive
operations are still higher and abstract. You can understand why things happen
and how to control them. So this is a kind of enlightenment, but it is
natural-rational mind rather than spiritual-rational mind. Your heaven is in
your spiritual-rational consciousness, while your hell is in your
natural-corporeal consciousness (see Section xx).
So there is a natural-rational type of
enlightenment, like expertise or being good at something from experience, and
there is a spiritual-rational type of enlightenment which comes only from
the doctrine of truth from Sacred Scripture (see Section xx). The source of our
natural-rational enlightenment is the natural mind through the physical
body. The source of our spiritual-rational enlightenment is the spiritual
mind through the spiritual body. It is similar with reading and understanding
Sacred Scripture. At first we understand it naturally with our natural-sensuous
and natural-rational mind. This is the literal sense of Sacred Scripture and
provides natural enlightenment about God, salvation, and eternity. We can read
Sacred Scripture in the form of the Old Testament, the New Testament, or the
Writings of Swedenborg and focus on the literal sense. This will not lead to our
spiritual enlightenment.
But we can achieve spiritual enlightenment from Sacred
Scripture if we translate the literal sense into its universal correspondential sense
(see Section xx). In this way we begin to accumulate knowledge of theistic
psychology. The rational understanding of this knowledge constitutes spiritual
enlightenment. Note that we can read theistic psychology, like this textbook,
and understand it not rationally, but naturally. Probably most students who
happen to enroll in this course are reading theistic psychology at the natural
level of understanding (see student reports at:
www.soc.hawaii.edu/leonj/theistic/#part2
What is spiritual enlightenment?
It is the elevation of consciousness to the level of
operation in our mind called heaven (see Section xx). What is consciousness? It
is the perception of truth which forms reality. There is only one reality, one
truth. This is the reality and truth of God. This reality in the form of Divine
Truth is created by the spiritual substances streaming out from the Spiritual
Sun and creating the rational ether out of which the human is constructed in
eternity (see Section xx). Divine Speech issues from the Mind of God, the Divine
Human, and since this is a an actual real substance, it forms everything real
out of itself. Every object or event or feeling is constructed out of this
spiritual substance called truth, within which is God's love. Divine Love
substance is the operation of God's Affective Organ, which is covered over with
Divine Truth substance, this being the operation of God's Cognitive Organ. This
Divine Human operation is also called the marriage of good and truth, or the
marriage of love and wisdom. It is called a marriage because love always
conjoins with its own kind of truth when it creates reality.
Reality is created in our mind in two steps. First, there
is the influx of spiritual heat into the affective organ of our unconscious
spiritual mind. Simultaneously, there is an inflow of spiritual light into the
cognitive organ of our unconscious spiritual mind. Reality in our mind is
constructed by this inflowing operation of good and truth in our spiritual mind
that is completely independent of our will and awareness. This involuntary
operation of reality in our spiritual mind then activates by correspondence the
events in our conscious natural mind. The result of this is the reality of
rationality and conscience in our conscious natural mind (See
Section 7.0.4.1).
Everyone is aware of the operation of conscience and
rationality in their conscious natural mind (See
Section 7.0.4.1). Conscience is the rational
perception of right and wrong, good and evil, heavenly and hellish. This
rational perception is available to our conscious natural mind only because it
"descends" into our conscious understanding from our spiritual mind where it is
received by influx from the Spiritual Sun. Now the Divine Psychologist
supervises and manages every detail of these mental operations. This is often
hard to understand and accept because we still tend to attribute the power of
thinking to ourselves. While God wills that we appear to ourselves as thinking
as-though from ourselves, we need to remember consciously and rationally that it
is God who does all things in us and outside us. If we include this in our
thinking, we grow in rationality, but if we forget it or deny it, our real
rationality ends, and what we have instead is a kind of quasi-rationality that
misleads us and instead of understanding reality, we construct a false imaginary
reality. As a result we are less human, more animalistic, more hellish. God
continues to exercise control over us whether we are rational or animalistic.
Either way, God continues to make things happen that allow us to become more
rational.
Enlightenment is the state of mind we are in when our
natural thinking is re-aligned to fit our rational thinking.
We are born with a mental tendency to enjoying hellish
operations. Asserting ourselves over others regardless of good and truth, is a
common way in which we maintain ourselves in a hellish state of mind. We promise
things we don't perform by excusing ourselves and justifying our neglects and
weaknesses by which we make others suffer. We care less about how we make others
suffer as much as we care about getting our way, whatever it is, even if it is
unjust, unfair, irrational, cruel, uncaring, animalistic. Because we are
unwilling to resist these feelings or giving them up, we remain in a mental
state of hell. This is the opposite of enlightenment. When we are in the
opposite state of enlightenment we go through phases of feeling bad for doing
the right thing, and feeling good for doing the wrong thing. This is the state
of hell and leads to disorder, injury, destruction, unhappiness, and lack of
productivity and inventiveness. It may appear to us at first that we are making
progress and gaining, but ultimately we set ourselves up for failure and hell.
We cannot be enlightened when our natural habits of
feeling, thinking and doing are based on our inherited hellish states of mind.
But at some point in adult life we experience an awakening, an intense desire to
be enlightened spiritually. This is a desire for more rationality in our mind.
We then begin to explore what our culture has to offer in terms of spirituality.
Our first phase is to get involved with sensuous spirituality (see Section xx).
This often involves an interest in new age nonduality (see Section xx). This
attitude of mind is based on the idea that there is a continuity between us and
God, so that as we grow in spirituality, we will be God (see Section xx). Of
course this is a total denial of the rational duality as given in Sacred
Scripture, which is that God must be outside the created universe in order to be
able to create it. Hence it is irrational to think that this duality of
creator/created can be continuous, or of the same substance and quality. New age
nonduality can involve the mind endlessly, and hopelessly, getting us deeper and
deeper into a mental state that is not capable or willing to receive the
rational truths of Sacred Scripture.
But at one point we are ready to move on with our character
reformation and preparation for heavenly eternity. This starts with our
enlightenment. We begin to see that we have an eternal future based on our
relationship to God. We begin to see that we alternate in our daily life between
mental states of being in our heaven and in our hell. We begin to see more
clearly from conscience as to what is right and what is wrong in our life,
feelings, thoughts, and conduct. We begin to form in our understanding the
Doctrine of truth from Sacred Scripture. These now constitute the reality we
identify with and that we want. We recognize the supervisory role of God in our
mental life. We accept it. We begin to love it and to trust God. Now begins the
phase of our temptations and regeneration (see Section xx).
1.1.4.2.2
Spiritual Empowerment
The period of enlightenment now continues to develop. The
progress of our spiritual development is proportional to our willingness to
endure spiritual temptations. We are already familiar with natural temptations
and our battles with conscience to maintain moral conduct as a citizen, parent,
spouse, and individual. We can continue to develop morally even if we are not
enlightened. But no matter how much we make progress in our moral development,
we cannot begin to progress in our spiritual development -- until we are
enlightened, as discussed above, and then we must be willing to undergo
spiritual temptations.
Natural temptations have to do with moral dilemmas like
wanting to take unfair advantage of someone, wanting to cheat, wanting to make
yourself feel good at the expense of someone else, wanting to be rewarded for
something we don't deserve, and so on. These natural temptations must be
overcome successfully through our conscience and our principles of living (See
Section 7.0.4.1).
Natural temptations start in childhood and go on throughout life. Spiritual
temptations only start in adulthood, after we undergo enlightenment. If we are
unwilling to be enlightened by rational spirituality through Sacred Scripture,
we cannot undergo spiritual temptations, and therefore, we cannot regenerate our
character from hellish to heavenly (see Section xx).
Spiritual temptations are brought to our conscious
awareness by the Divine Psychologist who chooses the timing on the basis of what
we are willing to obey. The Divine Psychologist also arranges the events in our
life so that the temptations can be brought to our awareness. The Divine
Psychologist has revealed in Sacred Scripture that He never brings a spiritual
temptation to someone who is not ready to oppose it and fight like hell against
it. We must engage in spiritual combat against the hells to which we are
connected by birth. The Divine Psychologist only brings us to spiritual
temptations after He has equipped us with the weapons of truths that we must
possess in order to engage in spiritual combat.
These inner power tools are constructed out of the
spiritual truths we obtain from translating the literal sense of Sacred
Scripture into its correspondential sense (see Section xx). The correspondential sense of
Sacred Scripture is called the spiritual Doctrine of Truth (see Section xx).
This is the Doctrine we must construct and build up in our mind as we study
Sacred Scripture. Once it is in our mind, we begin to filter everything in our
daily life through that Doctrine. As the Divine Psychologist brings spiritual
temptations to us we experience an attack on our understanding of Doctrine.
This spiritual attack is felt like a doubt in our spiritual
truths that we have already appropriated in our reformation and regeneration. We
feel intense pressure from the hells to reject or modify the rational truths of
Sacred Scripture that we already possess. We want to feel, think, and do what we
desire and feel we must have regardless of what our spiritual Doctrine says in
our mind. We want to weaken our connection and loyalty to the spiritual truth,
so that we may abandon it for now, make an exception for now. But if we do, we
throw ourselves back into our natural life where we feel good for doing bad, and
feel bad for doing good. we don't want to do good, to think right, to feel and
intend from our heaven. We are in mortal danger at this point and this is when
the Divine Psychologist, or God as the "Holy Spirit" in our mind, is the closest
to us ever (see Section xx).
It doesn't feel like that though! Subjectively it feels
like we are in agony. It feels like God has abandoned us to our own devices to
fight the un-fightable hells in us. We do not have slightest power to overcome
these hells in our spiritual temptations. We are assailed, inundated,
suffocated. But we can overcome all this when we activate our rational
understanding of how the Divine Psychologist is behind all this drama!
Sticking with the Divine Psychologist is called "cleaving
to God" or "loving God more than anything." And the strength of this love is
that it is our individual unique reciprocation to God's activity in our mind.
That's all God needs to instantly wipe out the hells from contact with you. This
is called "being delivered." God delivers us from our inherited connection with
the hells, breaks it, makes it impossible for the hells in our mind to break out
again into our consciousness and make us doubt the Doctrine of truth from Sacred
Scripture. The temptation is then consummated. It is over. Never again will the
hells in our mind be able to attack us from that same direction, though we must
know that there are many directions, many door, many connections that must be
individually dismantled through this process of character reformation (see
Section xx).
Now in the phase immediately following our victory in
spiritual combat, we experience rational ecstasy.
1.1.4.2.3
Rational Ecstasy
Rational ecstasy refers to the feeling and perspective we
have when we are in the heavens of our eternity.
Swedenborg was conscious in his spiritual mind from age 57
to 84, when he passed on never to return to earthly consciousness. But during
those 27 years of dual citizenship (see Section xx), Swedenborg was able to see,
hear, and talk to numerous people who are in their heavenly eternity in the
afterlife. He described their mentality and life, and he called them angels or
angel-people (see Section xx). They lived in constant and unceasing rational
ecstasy.
Immediately following victory in spiritual combat, we are
given to experience raitonal ecstasy, which is called "the sphere of heaven."
It is also called "the elevation of the mind into heaven" and also "being in
company with angels and in communication with them." Physiologically, the Divine
Psychologist opens a channel of correspondence between some event in our
unconscious spiritual mind and its corresponding conscious event in our natural
mind. It is the mental state of victory in which we are after our spiritual
combat, that allows the Divine Psychologist to open in us this spiritual channel
of communication with our heaven. We know that the Divine Psychologist, out of
His Divine Love for the universal human race, would desire to open this
spiritual channel for everyone and to keep it open from here to eternity. We
know from Sacred Scripture that God desires to do this because His purpose in
maintaining the universe is to bring human beings into a state of mental heaven
in eternity (see Section xx).
In order to accomplish this, God must find a way of
getting each human being to love rationality.
God's omnipotence makes this happen. God wills that we
fight for our principles when tempted to give them up. This is the only way the
break or disconnect our attachment and delight in hellish traits. We are already
attached to hellish delights and life, so if we were to be cut off from them, we
would feel that our life is ending. Our happiness and freedom is ending. Our
humanity is ending. This is so irrational that it is impossible for us to
get into the rationality of our heaven. Swedenborg saw people who were just
resuscitated, demand that they be admitted to heaven on account of their
religion. They were then brought into the mental state of their heaven. They
literally freaked! they were not ready to endure even a few seconds in the
atmosphere and mental life of their heaven. Everything within their thoughts and
feelings contradicted the sphere of heaven. They felt tortured and quickly
precipitated their consciousness back down into their hellish mind, whereupon
they revived and were able to continue their life.
This is what would happen to us if God suddenly cut off the
life of delights we have from hell.
And so we must learn gradually to be cut off from our hell.
And this is done through spiritual combats against the delights of our hells and
the beliefs and false principles that go with the hells in our mind. When we win
in spiritual combat, our love for the Doctrine of truth from Sacred Scripture is
immediately strengthened, and consequently our rational spirituality of God
grows more interiorly towards the Spiritual Sun and towards Him as the Divine
Human in whom infinite things make one (see Section xx).
As we approach God through our love and loyalty for His
Sacred Scripture, using it in daily spiritual combats against our hellish
traits, we begin to feel rational ecstasy more continuously, not just in the
victory after combat.
It is important to understand that waging spiritual
combat does not mean natural or social combats against others in our environment
and society.
Many people have made use of Sacred Scripture to fight
social combats against those whom they see as promoting evils and falsities in
society. This is not what is meant here by spiritual combats. Obviously, when
you fight against others in your social environment, you are engaged in natural
combats in your society, also called politics and civil war. These are not
spiritual wars. the only wars that allow us to regenerate are spiritual wars,
and the only spiritual wars are those we fight with ourselves in our own mind.
When we are victorious and prevail against others in
natural and moral battles, we may feel good, but it is not rational ecstasy.
This is felt only with spiritual combats and victories. Rational ecstasy is a
celestial sensation called "being in the stream of Divine Providence" and also
"the peace that surpasses all understanding." It is in fact a rational feeling,
or sensation, a kind of subtle vibration or tremulation (see Section xx). It is
a constant conscious reminder that we are spirits in a material body,
temporarily trapped, but soon to be released. It is also a feeling of trust
which comes from the rational understanding of God's omnipotence and love. Even
if you feel anxious, depressed, stressed out because of external natural
circumstances, you do not lose the sensation of rational ecstasy. You are
permanently immersed in it. It is like contained excitement on the edge of
enthusiasm and energy. It is wonderful. And it helps you remain aware of the
continuous presence and role of the Divine Psychologist in our mind.
1.1.4.3
How Divine Speech Descends In the Human Mind Through
Discrete Layers and Keeps It Functioning
Our mental heaven in eternity is inborn. This heaven is
already present in our mind when we are born, just as hell is present in the
human mind at birth. Physiologically, our mind is constructed out of heavenly
feelings and traits and out of hellish feelings and traits. In other words,
heaven and hell are located within the spiritual organs of the mind. This
awesome secret has been revealed thousands of years ago in the literal sense of
Sacred Scripture. An example is the scientific revelation in the New Testament
Sacred Scripture:
Being demanded of the Pharisees when the kingdom of God
should come, He answered them, and said, The kingdom of God cometh not with
observation; neither shall they say, Lo here! or, Lo there! for behold, the
kingdom of God is within you (Luke 17:20-21).
The phrase "cometh not with observation" means that the
natural mind, which is formed by physical content, cannot be in heaven. In the
literal sense it means that heaven is not in the natural world but in the
spiritual world of eternity. Hence this passage, among others in the New
Testament Sacred Scripture, reveals the scientific reality of dualism, that is,
of the existence of this world in time-space, and the world of eternity which is
snot in time-space. The phrase "the kingdom of God is within you" means that
eternity is in our mind. "Within you" contrasts with the phrase "with
observation" which is outward through the physical senses, while "within you" is
mental and is not observable outwardly by the physical senses.
I am amazed that I did not realize the meaning of this
passage the first time I read it thirty years ago (see Section xx). And I am
astonished that no one until Swedenborg in the eighteenth century, took note of
this amazing scientific revelation in the New Testament. It wasn't until I
became an expert on Swedenborg and then read this passage again that its meaning
hit me. It is the Divine revelation of scientific dualism (see Section xx).
Similar scientific revelations occur in the Old Testament Sacred Scripture, as
for instance the Genesis verses:
In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth
(Gen. 1:1).
And the heavens and the earth were finished (Gen. 2:1).
These are the nativities of the heavens and of the earth
(Gen. 2:4),
In the literal sense it plainly says that God created the
spiritual world of eternity ("the heavens") and the natural world of time,
space, and energy. This is the Divine confirmation of scientific dualism as a
reality, not a hypothesis or theory. What is not revealed here is that the world
of the heavens in eternity is the same as the mind. For thousands of years
people who derived their religion from the Old Testament had a materialistic
worldview, not abstracted from the senses. They were not willing to think of the
heavens as being created in a separate universe, outside time, space, or region.
To think of the universe of eternity, not in space, not in time, involving no
material substances, and yet still supportive of human life and happiness,
requires a rational spirituality, not material or sensuous. It requires a
rational consciousness of God. This level of thinking had not yet developed in
the human mind until the age of science and modernism starting in the 18th
century (see Section xx).
This is the reason that 20 centuries of Christian
scholarship and adoration of the New Testament were not able to uncover this
obvious heavenly secret, namely, that "the Kingdom of God is within you." In
theistic psychology I render this statement by the following formulaic
expression:
the Kingdom of God = eternity and human life there =
the heavens = within you = your mind = your mental organs = your feelings,
thoughts, and loves = the self = immortality
Is this not an astonishing realization?
You too will be astonished as soon as you begin to reflect
on this amazing rational equation. This equation shows that all human beings are
born immortal! Who knew this? The vast majority of people on this planet today
belong to the Jewish, Christian, Muslim, Hindu, and Buddhist religions and
practices. None of these religions give a clear and factual description of our
immortality or life in eternity. None of the religions give any clear
explanation of the most basic facts that Swedenborg presents in the Writings
Sacred Scripture. As for instance the fact that every human being who dies is
resuscitated within 36 hours and continues life in eternity as himself or
herself. Which religious leader, prophet, or scholar has known this? The reason
is that Sacred Scripture reveals almost nothing about life after death -- when
you consider the literal meaning of the sentences of Sacred Scripture. This is
why all sorts of imaginative and fantastic interpretations have been given of
the Book of Revelations, which is the last book of the New Testament
Sacred Scripture, and is written in a prophetic and visionary style, rather than
historical narrative, as the rest of the New Testament is written.
The most popular beliefs surrounding the symbolism and
interpretation of the Apocalypse, or Book of Revelation, have been that its
visionary scenes that John witnessed "while being in the spirit," describe
symbolically the historical scenes that will take place on earth at the
so-called "end of times" or when the physical planet is destroyed and
instantaneously remade, while the faithful who are saved, are "caught up in the
air" and kept safe during these tumultuous events that destroy earth. Then a
"new earth" is created by God for those who are "resurrected from the graves,"
put back together again with new and immortal bodies, to enjoy forever on the
new earth.
These amazingly imaginative ideas come from one source --
the practice of interpreting the literal sense of Sacred Scripture in accordance
with one's own ideas, beliefs, scholarship, intelligence, or imagination. None
of these approaches can yield the true spiritual meaning that is hidden within
the literal sense of Sacred Scripture (see Section xx). Instead, it was
necessary to wait until God reveals the appropriate method for extracting the
hidden meaning from the literal sentences. This method had been revealed before
by God to the most ancient peoples on this earth. Swedenborg interviewed some of
these people who have been living since then in their celestial heavens. They
informed him that when they were on earth they called this knowledge the Science
of Correspondences (see Section xx).
This therefore is the most ancient science on the planet.
It has to do with how the spiritual world of causes relate or act upon the
natural world of effects. In other words, the science of correspondences was the
rational revelation of scientific dualism and how the two worlds are connected
by laws. Swedenborg interviewed people in eternity who were from different
historical eras on earth. He was thus able to piece together a historical chart
of the succeeding civilizations on this earth (see Section xx), describing the
mentality and character of those people. After some generations, the most
ancient civilization died out and in its place arose a series of civilizations.
By the time the Old Testament Sacred Scripture was written about three thousand
years ago, almost nothing was left of the knowledge of the science of
correspondences. It was so well hidden that no one knew, not even the prophets
who wrote the Bible, that the sentences of Sacred Scripture were written in
correspondences because they represented the content of Divine Speech.
This history is necessary for us to know because of a
rational principle that I would like to phrase as follows:
Individual biography recapitulates human evolution and
history
In other words by knowing the details of the mental
evolution of the human race on earth we are able to know details of our own
mental states and how they develop in our life from birth to eternity (see
Section xx).
It wasn't until the Writings of Swedenborg in the
eighteenth century that the human mind was first given knowledge again of the
lost science of correspondences. Now for the first time we are able to read
Sacred Scripture and extract from it the Divine Speech that is hidden within it.
In order for God to revive this consciousness in the human race it was necessary
that He select a scientist, like Swedenborg, who was given the scientific
genius, rationality, and reputation, to bring this science of dualism back into
modern times and the modern person of the future. In order to succeed, it was
necessary for this person to be given access to the laboratory of eternity.
This was done by making Swedenborg's spiritual mind to be
conscious while he was still living on earth. At age 57, he became a dual
citizen, living and interacting in both worlds simultaneously! Only a scientist
who had access to both worlds simultaneously could make the necessary
observations of this science of correspondences, since it is the science of how
the worlds are connected by functional cause-effect laws for all phenomena. Now
any person who studies these laws of correspondences can read Sacred Scripture
and figure out its hidden correspondential sense. This correspondential sense is the content
of Divine Speech. Theistic psychology is the knowledge extracted from the
literal sense of the Writings Sacred Scripture (see Section xx).
In order to understand this more clearly, it is necessary
to have a mental chart of the human mind and how it is created, ordered, and
managed by God through Divine Speech. Study the following conceptual diagrams
which are explained elsewhere in theistic psychology (see Volume 6):
1.1.4.3.1
Conceptual Charts of the Physiology of God and the
Human Mind
Chart 1

Chart 2

Chart 3

Chart 4

Chart 5

Our consciousness is designed to travel up and down the
various levels of our mind. When we are born our spiritual body has various
levels of operation along which our consciousness can travel up and down. Divine
Speech, or Divine Love and Truth as spiritual heat and light, streams forth from
the Spiritual Sun into the universe, and enters simultaneously into every
individual mind of the human race -- just as sunlight and heat from the natural
sun, enter every plant, giving it the energy to grow, survive, and reproduce. In
this way spiritual heat and light from the Spiritual Sun enter the human mind at
its highest level called "the third heaven" (see Section xx).
If you knew how to elevate your consciousness to your third
heaven right now, you would understand Divine Speech at the level called
celestial-rational correspondences of Divine Speech. At this level you are
nearly omniscient, because anything whatsoever you think about or are curious
about, instantly appears in your awareness. You do not have to search for the
answer or understanding, you do not have to discover it, study it, or ask
someone else about it. The information comes to your awareness to fill the gap
of wondering about it. This is why our mental state in the third heaven can be
described as nearly omniscient. Of course we do not have this knowledge and
understanding from ourselves, and the instant we think we do, it disappears from
our mind and we become stupid. We must know rationally that this omniscient
knowledge is God's knowledge that He grants to be within us, and if we forget
this, we lose the knowledge because we lose that close communication with Divine
Speech in which all possible knowledge is contained.
The celestial-rational correspondences of Divine Speech
that we have in the third heaven of our mind causes correspondential operations
to occur in our second heaven of our mind. If you were conscious of this level
of operation in your mind, you would be thinking and reasoning with
spiritual-rational correspondences of Divine Speech as it descends and
expands into the universe. At this level of thinking you must do research and
studying before you can know and understand the many rational things you are
curious about. You don't just recognize truths instantly but must reflect and
figure out in order to be able to confirm it.
The spiritual-rational correspondences of Divine Speech
that we have in our second heaven causes correspondential operations to occur in
the first heaven of our mind. Swedenborg saw the mentality of people who dwell
in their first heaven. their reasoning was based on spiritual-natural
correspondences of Divine Speech. This level of thinking and reasoning is
most familiar to us when we gain knowledge and expertise in our activities. We
do not think of these in a fully rational way because we mix what is rational
with what is not rational. An example would be the knowledge possessed by artists,
scientists, managers, or skilled workers. They do not think purely rationally
and often confuse what they see with the senses and what they think rationally
separated from the senses.
The spiritual-natural correspondences of Divine Speech that
we have in the first heaven of our mind causes correspondential operations to
occur in our conscious natural mind. At this level of operation in our mind, we
think and reason with merely natural correspondences of Divine Speech as
it descends and expands into the universe. At this level of thinking we cannot
figure out what is sensuous-empirical and what is rational-spiritual. When
Sacred Scripture of Divine speech is written down at this level it appears as
history that reflects the mentality of the people rather than God's mentality.
As a result people are able to interpret Sacred Scripture in any way they please
to suit their purposes.
These purposes are selfish rather than heavenly. The more
selfish and hostile are a person's purposes, the more one distorts one's
rationality. Since every heavenly level of thinking and reasoning can be
distorted by evil intentions and motives, there are in the human mind levels of
hell, which are the contradictions and perversions of each level of heaven.
Hence there is a first hell in our mind which is the contradiction of the
reasoning process in our first heaven. Similarly there is a second hell and a
third hell to correspond to the heavens.
Your consciousness can travel up and down these built in
levels of mental operation, from the third heaven at the top of the human mind,
all the way down to the third hell at the bottom of the human mind. Because
Swedenborg's spiritual mind was made conscious to him at age 57, he was able to
travel up and down this consciousness path, and he described them all (see
Section xx). You too can see and learn what he learned if you were suddenly made
conscious in your spiritual mind. As it is, this normally happens at
resuscitation, 36 hours after we are cut off from the physical body by its
death. Then we remain conscious in our natural mind for a short while, until our
second death, at which time our natural mind is put to sleep and we are
propelled by our ruling love to keep our consciousness where it is. If this
ruling love is in one of the three heavens, that is the level of life we enjoy
to eternity. But if the ruling love is in hell, that's where spend our eternity.
Study Questions: 1.1 to 1.1.4.3.1 (Report 3)
Week 7 Readings: Section 1.1 to 1.1.4.1
-
Student 1: 1, 4, 7
-
Student 2: 2, 5, 8
-
Student 3: 3, 6, 9
7.1.
(a) Study the Table that begins Section 1.1 "Three Levels of Thinking About
God." Explain the history of your own development regarding the idea of God.
(b) Use
the Table to describe your own thinking today at each level.
(c) Can you guess about where
will your thinking take you in the future?
7.2.
(a) Make up a gain-loss sheet that lists and briefly explains what you could
gain or lose by adopting the negative vs. positive bias in science regarding God's
existence as a scientific reality.
(b) Read the list. Comment on it from an objective point of view.
7.3.
(a) Why does God allow people to be in the negative bias in science and survive as well
as those who are in the positive bias in science?
(b) Comment on this situation. Do you understand it? Do you see problems with
it?
7.4.
(a) Explain the difference between religion as a mystical view of God and Sacred
Scripture vs. theistic psychology as scientific view of God and Sacred
Scripture.
(b) Is knowing about this difference important to you? Explain.
7.5.
(a) Summarize the ten conclusions that follow logically from the positive bias
assumption that God exists in science.
(b) Does this proof make sense to you? Do you accept it as proof?
(c) Do any of your friends accept it as an adequate proof that if God exists
then He must be a Divine Human Person whose creation must therefore be perfect.
7.6.
(a) Prove rationally that our mental world is the world of eternity.
(b) What will
be the consequences for society when this knowledge becomes known?
(c) Check it out with your friends. Are they jumping up and down with joy when
they hear you describe it?
7.7.
(a) How are humans different from animals?
(b) What makes us human? Justify the
statement that we are human because we are rational.
(c) Explain why animals are not
immortal.
(d) How do you react to this knowledge?
7.8.
(a) Describe the Incarnation Event from the perspective of theistic psychology.
(b) Explain what it means to say that "when God entered history He entered
science."
(b) Does this makes sense to you? Does it change anything about your ideas of
God?
(c) What would happen if this knowledge becomes known to the public in general?
7.9
(a) In what sense can we say that the Incarnation Event is the completion of the
creation of the human race?
(b) What difference does it make to the human race? What new evolutionary
abilities does it give us? How does this influence our future in eternity?
Week 8 Readings: Section 1.1.4.2 to 1.1.4.3.1
-
Student 1: 1, 4, 7
-
Student 2: 2, 5, 8
-
Student 3: 3, 6, 9
8.1.
(a) Explain how we become spiritually enlightened by studying theistic
psychology.
(b) What is the difference between natural and spiritual enlightenment?
(c) Who do you know that is enlightened?
8.2.
(a) What are temptations? Explain how our spiritual development depends on our willingness to fight
our temptations.
(b) What happens after we are victorious in a temptation?
(c) What have you observed
about your own temptations in the past?
8.3.
(a) When and how did Sacred Scripture reveal that heaven in eternity is the
mental world?
(b) Why do you think that this knowledge remains unknown or
disbelieved?
(c) Search the Web to see if anything about this is known. What is your
conclusion?
8.4.
(a) Explain the principle that "individual biography recapitulates human
evolution and history."
(b) How does this influence the way you see yourself?
8.5.
(a) In your own words explain chart 1 in Section 1.1.4.3.1. Do not just guess.
You will need to do some research in
Volume 18 to find the
explanations and clarifications:
www.soc.hawaii.edu/leonj/theistic/#Searching_for_something
8.6.
(a) In your own words explain chart 2 in Section 1.1.4.3.1. Do not just guess.
You will need to do some research in
Volume 18 to find the
explanations and clarifications:
www.soc.hawaii.edu/leonj/theistic/#Searching_for_something
8.7.
(a) In your own words explain chart 3 in Section 1.1.4.3.1. Do not just guess.
You will need to do some research in
Volume 18 to find the
explanations and clarifications:
www.soc.hawaii.edu/leonj/theistic/#Searching_for_something
8.8.
(a) In your own words explain chart 4 in Section 1.1.4.3.1. Do not just guess.
You will need to do some research in
Volume 18 to find the
explanations and clarifications:
www.soc.hawaii.edu/leonj/theistic/#Searching_for_something
8.9.
(a) In your own words explain chart 5 in Section 1.1.4.3.1. Do not just guess.
You will need to do some research in
Volume 18 to find the
explanations and clarifications:
www.soc.hawaii.edu/leonj/theistic/#Searching_for_something
Report 3: due March 7. Answer Questions for Weeks 7 and 8.
1.1.4.3.2
Extracting the Content of Divine Speech Through
Correspondences
See the
Layers Diagram.
All Sacred Scripture is Divine Speech, "God's
Word" or Divine Truth expressed in a natural language. God communicates with people in two ways
-- conscience and Sacred Scripture. Conscience is an inner voice that
only the individual can hear or feel (layers
7A, 7C), while Sacred Scripture is a physical book that has to be read or
heard with physical senses (layer 12S). God uses these two means of communication to
elevate the rational understanding of a person. People refer to conscience as
something intuitive and vague. But in fact we all experience conscience as
definite and sometimes overwhelming. The more we are willing to listen to our
conscience, the more we develop our natural-rational mind (layer 7C). This is
because conscience (layer 7) is a organ that reacts by correspondence to the
truths (C) and goods (A) in the spiritual layer 6 above it. The more we
disregard the voice or insight of conscience, the more sensual-scientific we
become (layer 8). At this layer, no spiritual-natural or spiritual-rational
truths can exist, hence the layers of our heavens above cannot develop into
maturity. Listening to conscience is very effective in facing temptations.
Ultimately however, most people will need reinforcing their conscience with more
particular knowledges and spiritual truths from Sacred Scripture.
The more we are willing to be
elevated in our rational understanding (layer 7C) through conscience and Sacred
Scripture, the more we can be spiritually
enlightened to understand more interior truths such as spiritual-natural (layer
6C) or spiritual-rational truths (layer 5C). This raises our human potential, our ability to be intelligent and
happy, loving and cooperative in social life. Ultimately, our condition and
quality of life
in the afterlife world of eternity will depend on our rational development.
In order to live
in a heaven of eternity (layers
6, 5, 4) we must be able to understand God rationally or
spiritually. So God's purpose in communicating with people through Sacred
Scripture is to raise their
human potential through rational correspondences of Sacred Scripture, and to bring them to their never ending
conjugial happiness in eternity (see
Volume 11).
From conscience every person knows in a
general way what is
right or wrong, good or bad (See
Section
7.0.4.1). From Sacred Scripture every society and culture
teaches that there is God, that there is life after death, and that our quality
of life in eternity depends on whether we acquire habits of good or habits of
evil. Without Sacred Scripture these essential things of living and survival
would not be known. So God communicates information about our eternity. This
means knowing what will happen when we die and cross onto eternity.
God gives Sacred Scripture revelations to
every culture and society in all the ages, whether a small isolated tribe in the
jungle, or large nations like the United States or India. Every generation in all
geographic locations has had access to a Sacred Scripture from God. Sometimes
the same Sacred Scripture is handed down for many generations, while at other
times new Sacred Scripture is given.
From this you can see that the revelation of
Divine Speech enters the mind of the prophet or revelator who has a special
relationship to God in order to serve this purpose of receiving the Divine
Speech in his conscious natural mind, and writing it down. What the prophet or
revelator writes down is Divine Speech translated into some natural language
through the conscious understanding of an ordinary person, often uneducated and
inexperienced. So the sentences that the prophet writes down are limited in
meaning to what the prophet can understand or transmit. And so the style of any particular
Sacred Scripture can vary from prophet to prophet, and from culture to culture.
You probably know some Sacred Scripture from education or literature. Most
Western democracies today are familiar with the Old Testament Sacred Scripture
and the New Testament Sacred Scripture ("Bible").
Remember however that the prophet does not
write down Divine Speech in its celestial and spiritual meanings as these
descend from his unconscious spiritual mind into his conscious natural mind.
This descent changes by correspondence what the prophet "hears" or "sees." In
fact the prophet can only see and hear natural correspondences of Divine Speech.
Nevertheless, hidden within these natural correspondences in
simultaneous order
are the entire series of correspondences as Divine Speech descended in
sequential order across
the layers of the spiritual mind.
Different religions base themselves on
different Sacred Scripture. Since all Sacred Scripture is Divine Speech, and
there is only one universal God, why then do the different versions of Sacred
Scripture lead to conflict among religions?
The answer is that it is not the different
versions of Sacred Scripture that lead to conflict, but their literal
interpretation applied the wrong way.
For example, the Name
of God in different Sacred Scripture varies and yet the literal sense states that
only this Name must be worshipped. When people with different versions of Sacred
Scripture take this literally (layer 8C)without rational interpretation (layer
7C), then their ideas and principles come into conflict with each other. Other
religions who worship God by another Name are therefore seen as false religions
with teachings contrary to one's own religion, which is seen as the only true religion.
So you can see how this leads to conflict, disagreement, even warfare and
hatred for each other. And yet cruelty and hatred are contrary to God's
instructions in every Sacred Scripture.
So it is clear that God wants people to read
Sacred Scripture not just literally (layer 8C), but in its rational meaning
(layer 7C), which is also its spiritual meaning (interior of the external
natural). This has been
done to some extent as societies advance in civilization and justice mentality.
People give interpretations of Sacred Scripture that try to reconcile the
differences and promote tolerance and mutual respect. And yet this is not true
for people in every generation, hence conflict continues. People who undergo
reformation through conscience and through truths of Sacred Scripture that they
interpret rationally or spiritually, tend to back off from intolerance and
conflict. For them, altruism and heavenly tolerance ("charity" or "spiritual
love") takes precedence over distinctions in interpretations and doctrines
("faith").
When Swedenborg became conscious in his
spiritual mind at age 57, he discovered that the people in the afterlife of
eternity also read Sacred Scripture. As a scientist, he was now in a unique
position to run an experiment to gather data on how Sacred Scripture creates the
layers of the human mind. He had in
front of him the wording of Sacred Scripture that he had on earth and was reading with
his natural mind (layer 8C), which was his Bible in Swedish, Latin, Hebrew, and Greek.
He
also had the Sacred Scripture in the spiritual mind across its layers (6, 5, 4). He could read
all versions simultaneously -- the version
written in a natural language and the version written in the spiritual language
across the upper layers. This is the language
that all people start using spontaneously (without learning) immediately after resuscitation when they become conscious
in their spiritual mind. But the versions of this spiritual language become more
and more interior as you ascend
the layers 6, 5, 4.
Swedenborg discovered that the natural
language version of Sacred Scripture was the correspondence of the spiritual
version. Every word or expression in the natural version of Sacred Scripture was
a correspondence of the equivalent spiritual expression that people used in the
mental world of the afterlife. None of the historical names and places
appeared in the spiritual version because these are natural representations of
spiritual things. Every detail mentioned in the natural version
use words that refer to things on earth -- animals, mountains, the sun, rivers,
cities, countries, names, places, physical objects and actions, armies of one
country invading another country, famines, natural disasters, women giving
birth, children, etc. This is the natural content of Sacred Scripture in its
literal sense. None of this appears in the spiritual sense of Sacred Scripture.
You can now realize that Sacred Scripture is
written in correspondences of natural things that represent spiritual things.
There is no other way that Divine Speech can be expressed to people who are
thinking at the level of 8C and 9C. When we express Sacred Scripture in rational
correspondences (layer 7C) it is possible to discuss the topics of theistic
psychology. Most people would not be interested in the spiritual meaning of
Sacred Scripture (or theistic psychology). It is necessary therefore that Sacred
Scripture be expressed at the level comprehensible to most people in their
exterior-natural mind (layer 8C). The spiritual content of Divine Speech is the developmental
psychobiology of the human mind. This is a scientific topic and very complex in
all its parts. Hence it is that it is necessary that Sacred Scripture have both
a literal historical meaning and a correspondential scientific meaning.
Theistic psychology is now possible because God has revealed in the Writings of
Swedenborg what the correspondences are that are hidden in the spiritual depth
of Sacred Scripture.
1.1.4.3.2.0 What are
Correspondences in Sacred Scripture?
The new scientific revelation of the existence of
correspondences, once this becomes known to people generally, will allow
humankind to understand two important principles:
-
(1) how God manages the universe by rational laws of
correspondence that are
spiritual (layers 6, 5, 4) but have a natural representation (layers
7, 8, 9)
-
(2) how our mind works in discrete but corresponding layers from the lowest to the highest human potential
of consciousness and abilities
God created the dual universe -- the natural or physical or material world of time-space-matter,
and the spiritual or mental world of eternity. Anything that is something
must be made of of something prior to itself. Memorize this sentence and reflect on it from
to time. It is the logical proof of substantive dualism (dual citizenship), and of the idea that
every human being is born with two bodies. One body is physical in the material
world of time-space, while the other body is spiritual in the
mental world of eternity. These two bodies (layers 12 and 10) must be made of
something that comes from prior to them (layers 9 to 1)!
Our physical body (layer 12) is made of matter in time-space. Our
spiritual body (layer 10) is made of substances in eternity (not in time-space).
The natural matter in time-space that composes our physical
body (or natural body) comes from the planet, which comes from the sun, which is
one of many stars in the physical universe that God created and is continuously
creating and managing in every detail.
The substances in eternity that compose our spiritual
body (and its mental layers) comes from the substances of the Spiritual Sun
(layer 1), which is
an aura of spiritual light and heat around God the Divine Human. Swedenborg
reports that anyone who raises their human potential to their highest layer of
the mind called celestial-rational (layer 4), can see the Spiritual Sun.
Sometimes the Divine Human can also be seen since He now possesses a Divine
Natural that is visible (see Section xx).
Material light and heat stream out of the natural sun,
forming force fields, gravity, and matter. In other words, the
physical sun creates a gravitational space around itself, then breaks off pieces
of itself which cool off as planets of matter, and these supply the material
needed for all things on earth.
Spiritual light and heat
stream out of the Spiritual Sun, forming rational ether in which are
constructed the layers of the human mind. The layers contain the mental organs
at each level: affective (A), cognitive (C), and sensorimotor (S). The affective
organ is a receptor or spiritual heat, while the cognitive organ is a receptor
of spiritual light.
Note that "natural sun" is not capitalized because if is not
alive or Divine, while the Spiritual Sun is always capitalized, like God and
Sacred Scripture. This is because spiritual substances are alive and Divine.
This is one of the most difficult rational concepts to understand in theistic
psychology. The reason theistic psychology is grounded in substantive dualism is
that there is no other scientific way of explaining the dual universe. If there
is a dual universe created by God, as it is asserted in theistic psychology, then
both worlds must be made of something -- either something like matter, which we
all know well, or something like substance, which we all also know full well.
Actually,
you know the world made of spiritual substances much better than the world made of matter.
How can this be? What is that world that you know so well?
Think!
That's it. It's the world of thinking (C) -- and feeling (A), and
sensations (S). The threefold self. You. I. Each of us. Is there anything that we
know better than our mental world? It is the most familiar thing we know. It is
our very life, our very consciousness as a being. So familiar every day -- my
thoughts, my sensations, my feelings in my private world called my mind.
So you are most familiar with your mental world.
What you may not know yet is that there is only one mental
world of eternity just as there is only one physical space in the natural
world of time and space.
In other words, this most familiar world we call "my mind,
or me" is located in the mental world of eternity. Your thoughts and feelings and
sensations are actually things or objects, spiritual things or mental things, and they must be made of
something. Our mental organs in our spiritual body (layer 10), which we get at birth of
course, are made of spiritual substances from the Spiritual Sun. This occurs
when we are born, and then it never ceases to eternity. Our sensations,
thoughts, and feelings are immortal because they are constructed of spiritual
substances from the Spiritual Sun, and these substances are immortal, because
Divine. These substances are called "uncreate" and exist in God and are from
God. They do not stop being Divine outside of God in created things. This is why
our infrastructure of the soul (layers 3) is not accessible to us but remains
the "abode" of God in a human being. From there God activates and manages all
lower layers through the built-in laws of correspondences.
So God had to create the mental world of eternity for the
human race in which to develop and to exist forever. He had to construct the
world eternity out of something because out of nothing there cannot come forth
anything. This something out of which the mental world was constructed, is the
spiritual light and the spiritual heat streaming out of the Spiritual Sun on a
continuous basis in endless variety forever -- thus reflecting God's infinity. Hence it is that our mind,
which is made of mental organs in our spiritual body (layer 10), is born immortal. Our mind
is born in the spiritual world of eternity and stays there. We never had a mind
here on earth, but only a physical body that has a brain that is responsive to
our mind through the built-in laws of correspondences. The two worlds are connected by the laws of correspondences.
This was unknown until it was revealed in Swedenborg's Writings in the 18th
century.
The spiritual world of eternity and the natural world of
time-space are functionally connected by the laws of correspondences as a
built-in part of
their creation. The dual universe could not possibly work separately. The
physical body without the mind is just a robot that does not have a spiritual
body in eternity, does not have a mind, cannot be immortal. Similarly the mind
without its own spiritual body cannot exist as a functioning unit
or person. Our sensations are operations in the sensorimotor organ of the
mind (S). Our thoughts are operations in the cognitive organ of the mind (C), and our
feelings and motivations are operations in our affective organ (A).
So from now on you need to start thinking of your sensations,
thoughts, and feelings as substantive, not material like the
physical brain, which
contains only operations of electricity and chemistry, not psychology. Only the mind has
operations of
psychology, and the mind (layers 9 through 4) is not in the physical body (layer
12), but in the
spiritual body (layer 10) in eternity, where it remains since birth, and continues living after it is disconnected from the physical body at death
a few hours later. Swedenborg was right
there as thousands of people were being resuscitated from death, just 30 hours
after dying (see Section xx).
One of your jobs once you're no longer connected to earth,
might be to assist in the resuscitation process of millions of people every day
from countless numbers of planets in the physical universe where the human race
exists.
Note that whether we say spiritual body or mental body, it
is the same. Spiritual = mental = eternity. Since we are born dual citizens,
in time-space and in eternity, we need two very different kind of bodies to
exist in each world. So we have a temporary physical body made of
physical matter, and a permanent ("immortal") spiritual body made of the
substances of the Spiritual Sun. We can call this a mental body or a spiritual
body. Either way, it means a human body made of organs and held together in a
body that is made of spiritual substances from the Spiritual Sun.
Now why do we say that the Spiritual Sun is in the mental
world of eternity? Here is the explanation.
Since God is the Divine Human Person in whom infinite things make one,
God has a Rational Mind and therefore His infinite
cognitive organ operates according to the order and laws of rationality (or
truth), this
being God's Own Nature or Being in relation to the created human race. Some
people believe that to approach close to God we need to reflect deeply or to
meditate, clearing the mind of worldly things, clearing the mind of everything
in it, until a higher consciousness is reached, beyond human thinking, and this
allows a feeling of "oneness" with the Divine, leading to ecstatic feelings and
states. However, according to theistic psychology based on Sacred Scripture,
Divine Truth is the same as Divine Rationality, so that to approach God we need
to do it by elevating our mind to higher and higher forms of rational
understanding. We are closest to God when we can think and reason with
celestial-rational correspondences of Sacred Scripture (layer 4C). The essence
of being human is rationality.
But you need to realize that truth does not exist by itself, no more than
sunlight can exist without heat within it that gives it energy and power to
accomplish things. The operations of the cognitive organ cannot occur by
themselves, no more than wood can be made to burn with a powerful flashlight.
For light to exist, there must be heat in it. For spiritual
light, which is truth, to enter and activate our cognitive organ at each layer,
there must be spiritual heat simultaneously entering the affective organ at each
layer. The affective (A) and the cognitive (C) must operate together if
either is going to operate.
To be elevated in consciousness to the celestial-rational
correspondences of Divine Truth (layer 4C) requires that we also have our
affective organ (A) elevated at least above the natural level. This can only
occur through our heavenly traits, when the enjoyment of our hellish traits has
been withdrawn from our motivational system. Then our inherited and acquired
hellish traits are gradually and progressively put to sleep by the Divine
Psychologist. We are then able to enjoy our heavenly traits, and this love for
them insures our existence in the heavenly layers (6, 5, 4) after resuscitation.
In the negative bias mode of thinking in science, called materialism
or monism, it
is denied that there is a dual universe without being able to provide a proof
for this ("negative bias in science"). Hence there is no
God, no eternity, no mental world. Just the brain and its electricity and
chemistry. This cannot be proven, hence it is called a bias. In this mode of
thinking, mental things like ideas or thoughts and dreams are nothing. They
don't really exist -- except as electricity and chemistry. So if you still think
this way (called "reductionism"), you will not understand theistic psychology at all.
So you need to switch to the positive bias in science, which is to
accept the concepts introduced here as possibly true and scientific, but
still remaining to be proven. This is called the positive bias mode of thinking
in science because you are accepting that the Spiritual Sun might possibly exist even
though no one can prove it by instruments or calculations. The point now is: What are the consequences and
benefits of taking on the positive bias mode of thinking in science? You
will be the judge of that as you continue your studies.
Now, since God is the Divine Human Person, He is in the human
form. This means that God has a spiritual body like we do, that is a
substantial mental body, and containing God's mental organs: affective organ (A), cognitive
organ (C), sensorimotor organ (S), which includes face, hands, legs, torso,
heart, lungs, brain, etc.. The only difference is that God's spiritual body is
uncreate and infinite, while ours is created and finite. So God made us look
like Him, male and female versions (see Part 2
for male and female mental anatomy). When God thinks in the cognitive organ, that thought is an actual construction made of
rational substances
called spiritual light.
This light now projects itself through the Spiritual Sun
(layer 1) into
the created universe and each object in it (layers 2 through 12). Thoughts are actual substances that
flow out and into organs of reception (C), just as our physical eye is an organ of
reception for physical light streaming into it from the sun millions of miles
away. As this light strikes objects and then enters our physical eye, and then
brain, our spiritual body then transforms the pattern of electro-chemical impulses in the brain
cells into the familiar experiences we call a sensation. This familiar experience
is not in the brain at all, but in the sensorimotor organ of the spiritual body
in eternity that is tied to the physical brain by correspondence.
But once we "die," our spiritual body suddenly stops
receiving information by correspondence from the physical body. Everything from
earth, the physical world, the physical body, is now gone. Silent. We are now
free from the shackles of the the time-space-matter world. You might think that
now somehow you are more restricted living a life less interesting than what you
had through the physical body. Right? Did you think that?
Well Swedenborg reports from direct observation that the
opposite is the case. In our spiritual body, no longer attached to the physical
world, we soar on the wings of the wind, like a dream world made for you.
Except: there are others. Everyone who was tied to a physical body, and
then lost the tie, is now in the world of eternity called the afterlife.
The mental world is much more real than the physical, as you know, when
you have a nightmare or a sexual experience in a dream. When you awaken, you can
still remember how vivid and intense and pure the experience was, whether
heavenly or hellish. We need to ask what these dreams are they
of.
Dreams are made of spiritual substances. Let
us call this substance "rational ether." Think of it as the space or atmosphere
that creates mental spaces when you think, imagine, or dream. What about the
objects and the people in your dream? What are thy made of? You can't say
that dreams are made of nothing, for this is illogical or reductionistic. The answer is: Dreams,
thoughts, images, reasoning sequences, are all operations of the cognitive
organ. This mental organ is made of spiritual substances from the Spiritual Sun.
It is also activated by these substances as spiritual light from the Spiritual
Sun streams into the mental organs (C) of every human being. This
constant stream of spiritual light from the Spiritual Sun is responsible for our
thoughts.
So our spiritual body and its mental organs are immersed in rational ether
from the Spiritual Sun, and can see things that appear around, just as the physical
eye can see physical objects from the light of the physical sun. But what
are the spiritual objects we can see with the eyes of the spiritual body?
The objects in your dreams are spiritual objects, so we are already very
familiar with spiritual objects. If you are dreaming of eating in a restaurant,
the table, the food, and the waiter are all spiritual objects. This means that
these objects are constructed out of the rational ether in the mental world
created by the Spiritual Sun (see discussion above). Spiritual objects are
produced by means of correspondences. Your feelings, intentions, and loves
spontaneously and automatically produce these spiritual objects that make up the
environment of your dream. You can understand this in a general way when you
realize that dark moods and fears are feelings that produce scary spiritual
objects and events, like falling off a mountain during a storm at night, or
being attacked by a bear that suddenly appears out of nowhere, etc. Good moods
and feelings can produce beautiful dreams of charming weather and friendly
animals and people.
Quoting from a Web site explaining the concept of
correspondences in Swedenborg's Writings:
A correspondence is a living link between one plane of life and another. It is
the link between spiritual planes and natural planes, e.g. the feelings and
the body. Smiling is a physical expression which corresponds to feelings of
delight. Correspondences are so much part of our life we take them for
granted. We often use them in speech. We use “seeing” to mean understanding
something, or the “heart” when describing feelings, as in, “broken hearted”,
“hard hearted”. The connection is more than words. We can actually feel pain
in our hearts or our stomachs, when we are heart broken or fearful. Swedenborg
shows how correspondences are the link between the distinct planes through
which we receive our life from God. Through them God is in touch with His
creation and sustains it.
http://www.spiritualwisdom.org.uk/correspondences-symbols.htm
There are two levels to the "plane of life." We are born into
both levels -- into the the plane of life outside time-space known as
eternity, and into the plane of life in time-space known as the natural
world. The mental world is permanent since it exists in eternity since
birth. In other words, human beings are born immortal beings. But the physical
body is temporary since it exists in time since birth. God created these two
planes of existence so that human beings could acquire a self and personality
through interacting with the natural world in time-space. God could not create
us directly into the world of eternity. The laws of life and existence in the
world of eternity are quite different from what people know on the earths in the
physical universe (see Section xx). This will be discussed further as we proceed
in the study of theistic psychology.
It makes sense therefore to think that God had to create a
method of correspondence between our immortal spiritual body and our temporary
physical body.
And these cause-effect laws of interaction --
correspondences -- had to apply not just to the structure of human beings but to
the environment of our physical body as well, hence to the entire planetary and
galactic system of the natural world.
Hence the laws of correspondences are a
blue print by which God creates and manages all the cause-effect events in the
dual universe.
These laws
were revealed to the earliest generations on this planet. When they started
writing down these correspondences, science was born (see Section xx). The
Science
of Correspondences was known to the ancient civilizations (see Section xx).
Subsequently they were lost and forgotten due to evolutionary events (see
Section xx). Now for the first time in modern times, correspondences have been
revealed once more in the Writings Sacred Scripture. The knowledge of these
correspondences now allows us to see through the literal sense of Sacred
Scripture, and extract from it the scientific revelations God wants humanity on
earth to know.
As the quote above indicates, correspondences have been
preserved in the structure of natural languages. Here are common instances you
will recognize:
NATURAL OBJECT OR QUALITY
IN PHYSICAL TIME-SPACE |
CORRESPONDENTIAL EQUIVALENT
IN MENTAL ETERNITY |
| smiling |
feelings of delight |
| seeing |
understanding |
| the heart |
feelings of love |
| broken hearted |
loss of a love and consequent feelings of sadness |
| hard hearted |
cold feelings of lack of sympathy for someone |
| hot under the collar |
feeling angry emotions |
| it's clear to me |
comprehending something |
| he has a generous hand |
he is motivated to help |
| he is only on the periphery |
he does not know inside information |
| this place gives me the creeps |
I'm scared |
| I was kept in the dark |
they intended to keep the information from me |
| it's a heavy burden on my shoulders |
I feel anxious and preoccupied by it |
| take out the gnat in your eye |
stop believing what is false about yourself |
| he is straight as a whistle |
he has an upright character |
| he's got a strong head |
he is intelligent |
| he is bull headed |
he is stubborn |
| he is a chameleon |
he is hypocritical or unpredictable |
| he is a wolf |
he cannot be trusted |
| he is a pig |
he has no manners or civility |
| he is a snake |
he is not trust worthy |
| she is a doll |
she is pretty or feminine |
| she eats like a bird |
she eats very little |
| she is a fox |
she tricks people |
| they easily fly off the handle |
they easily get mad |
| etc. etc. (how many more can you think of? Can you group
them into categories? What are those categories?) |
|
It makes sense that our natural mind constructs these correspondential equivalents
between the temporary world of our physical body and the eternal world of our
mental body.
Linguists and philosophers study "figures of speech,"
also known as metaphor, simile, symbol, analogy, and so on (see Section xx). The basis for constructing these figures of speech are correspondences between
the natural world of time and the spiritual world of eternity, also known to us
as the mental world. What could be more familiar to you than eternity, since you
are already so familiar with your own mental world. You did not know that
your familiar everyday mental world is the world of eternity, the world of the
afterlife, the world of your immortality!
The organs of the physical body are formed and shaped according to the organs in
the spiritual body:
|
MENTAL-PHYSICAL CORRESPONDENCES |
SPIRITUAL BODY
BORN INTO ETERNITY |
PHYSICAL BODY
BORN INTO TIME-SPACE |
| affective organ as our spiritual heart |
heart with its circulatory system of arteries, veins,
and capillaries |
| cognitive organ as our spiritual lungs |
lungs with its respiratory system and esophagus |
| sensorimotor organ as our spiritual sensory and musculature |
brain with afferent sensory organs and efferent
musculature attached to skeleton |
Here are a few examples from the tradition of theistic astrology or
astronomica, contributed by David Chambers (see Section 6.12):
She is a hot head (Aries/Mars) She is reckless
He is stiff necked (Taurus/Venus dark side) He is stubborn
She is a chatterbox (Gemini/Mercury lower octave) She is communicative
He is crabby (Cancer/Moon) He is moody
She is lionhearted (Leo/Sun) She is courageous
He is a nit-picker (Virgo/Mercury higher octave) He is fastidious
She is a right madam (Libra/Venus light side) She is vain
He is too hot to trot (Scorpio/Pluto) He is passionate
She has a big heart (Sagittarius/Jupiter) She is generous
He is a tightwad (Capricorn/Saturn) He is frugal
She has got her head in the clouds (Aquarius/Uranus) She is absent minded
He is a slippery customer (Pisces/Neptune) He is elusive
All
Sacred Scripture is composed of pure correspondences of Divine Speech and their
representatives (see Section
xx).
Divine Speech is the same as Divine Truth or Divine Rational Thinking. Also
called spiritual
light within which is spiritual heat (see Section xx).
When you arrive in the third heaven of your mind (layer 4) you will be able to
see God as the Divine Human. Surrounding God the Divine Human you will see a bright aura
called the Spiritual Sun (layer 1). From this Spiritual Sun stream forth spiritual light
and spiritual heat in infinite variety. These two Divine Human
substances are God Himself as He wills Himself to exist outside of Himself and in
created eternity, as well as in the
natural world of time through His Divine Physical Body that he acquired fro
Himself in the Incarnation Event (see Section xx). Spiritual light and heat are substances
that create the world of eternity, which is the mental world of the human race,
and they create the world of time, which are the materials of the earths in the
natural world out of which our physical body is made.
So every physical stone
or molecule or planet has a mental or spiritual infrastructure which creates it
and maintains it in subsistence. See the
simultaneous view of the layers in Part 1.
God establishes a chain of correspondences across the layers of creation.
Creation and its continuous maintenance or re-creation, starts with Divine
Speech, which is Divine Truth, which is the content of God's infinite cognitive
organ streaming forth as spiritual light within, which is spiritual heat that
issues from God's infinite affective organ. God's spiritual heat is called
Divine Love or Divine Good. God's spiritual light is called Divine Truth or
Divine Wisdom and Rationality.
-
Spiritual Sun --
spiritual light (Divine truth or rationality) and spiritual heat (Divine good
or love)
-
Heaven of human internals
-
Soul
-
Celestial-rational layer (affective, cognitive,
sensorimotor) (third heaven)
-
Spiritual-rational layer of our mind (affective, cognitive, sensorimotor)
(second heaven)
-
Spiritual-natural layer of our mind (affective, cognitive, sensorimotor)
(first heaven)
-
Natural-rational layer of our mind (affective, cognitive, sensorimotor)
-
Natural-sensual layer of our mind (affective, cognitive, sensorimotor)
-
Natural-corporeal layer of our mind (affective, cognitive, sensorimotor)
-
Spiritual body
-
Natural limbus
-
Physical body and planet
Try to memorize this list if you haven't already from
the chart of layers in Part 1.
Note that God's infinite good and truth are spiritual
or mental substances streaming out of the Spiritual Sun (layer 1). It is
God's Own mental substances that are streaming out of Him, forming an aura
called the Spiritual Sun. This is the first layer of the mental world of
eternity. God is the First Cause, creating all the lower layers through
these substances within Himself. By causing these mental or spiritual substances
(good and truth) to exist outside of Him, God starts His creation.
Note that creation must start outside of God. Creation cannot be inside God,
since in that case there is not yet a creation. To create anything therefore,
God must cause His Own mental substances to come out so that they exist outside
of Himself. The first such an event is the Spiritual Sun or layer 1. Note that
this First layer is not made of created substances. Infinite Divine Good or Love
substance and infinite Divine Truth or Rationality substance have always existed
in God and have no beginning. But all things that have a beginning are created.
This is the definition given in Sacred Scripture of what is infinite.
Note that "infinite" does not mean without an end. It means without a beginning.
Think of time or counting from 1 onward. The process of counting can go on
endlessly, forever. But this this not make counting infinite because it always
will have a beginning. Also, think of physical space as endless, limitless,
going on without ever stopping. This does not make physical space infinite
because it had a beginning at the creation of the physical world. So the only
thing that can be infinite is that which does not have a beginning, always
existed. This is God, including all the infinite uncreate substances in God that
make a One as a Divine Human Person. God and His mental substances are the only
infinite that exists. There cannot be two "infinites" for in that case neither
would be infinite.
The idea some people have that "God is the universe" is not a rational
concept. I think it is easy for them to see this, but they say that it does not
have to be rational, but is above the rational (e.g., beyond human
understanding), and some say, below the rational (e.g., mystical). But in
theistic psychology it is necessary to use only rational concepts, and only
those that are extracted from Sacred Scripture. According to this source God is
a Person and the source of all rationality, wisdom, or truth.
The two types of substances in God's Mind are
infinite in variety and "quantity," though "quantity" is a concept that applies
to physical things not mental. In the mental world we create any quantity we
want and there is no limit as in the physical world. Be aware of our negative
bias idea that because it's "only mental" it is not as real as physical money
bills in the hand. This definition of reality only describes the physical world
(layer 12) and corporeal mind (layer 9). Once you move upward across the layers
from 9 to 4, things are becoming more real, more permanent and forever. In the
spiritual mind our mental powers are truly awesome. Swedenborg saw magnificent
palaces and architecture and art that cannot exist in the physical world. These
were all created in an instant by the mental operations of the people in that
state of mind. Mental substances are immortal and powerful, while things made of
physical matter are inert, slow, and temporary.
God's mental substances, exiting outside of Himself through the Spiritual Sun,
are powerful enough to create the layers of existence in the mental world of
humanity, each person being immortal, never ending once born. Eternity is
created by the substances of the Spiritual Sun. The substances of spiritual heat
(= good or love) exist as God's infinite affective organ in which infinite loves
and affections make a unit, an integral whole that is live or alive. Physical
substance is not alive, but mental substance is alive. So our mind can have the
constant experiencing of consciousness because the mental organs are constructed
of live substances, namely, the mental substances of God in whom everything is
live or alive. This aliveness is life itself and exists only in God and in the
Spiritual Sun.
The life that we have as human beings is not our life but God's life in us
through the substances of the Spiritual Sun. The substances of spiritual heat
and spiritual light flow into every one of our mental layers, and as they are
received by our affective, cognitive, and sensorimotor organs, these organs
appear to be alive on their own. But they are not. We feel alive to ourselves
because God's spiritual substances are operating in the organs and our conscious
experiencing is the result of those operations. If that inflow of substances
would cease, the organs would be inert, without life in them. So life is nothing
but those substances from the Spiritual Sun inflowing and operating in our
mental organs.
It is not simple to think of our sensations, thoughts, and feelings as
substances, especially if these substances are called good or love, and truth or
rationality. In our layer 8C (sensual mind) we cannot understand this because
what is mental does not seem as real as what is physical. But in our
interior-natural mind (layer 7C) we can think with rational concepts rather than
with sensual concepts.
We can say therefore that God is in us, but it is not rational to say that God
is part of us.
God's spiritual mental substances flowing into our mental organs allows our mind
to react to the mental substances of God flowing in. We are not those
substances, but we react to them. So we have nothing whatsoever of God that can
be part of us, or ours. God's substances are the core of every created thing, as
you can clearly see from the simultaneous view of the 12 layers.

You can clearly see that God through the Spiritual Sun is present as the inmost
of anything created. Present -- but not "part of."
God in Himself prior to the Spiritual Sun is unknowable. God
can be seen visually by those whose consciousness is at level 4 through the
understanding of celestial-rational correspondences. Swedenborg and all those
with whom he associated in the "third heaven" could visually observe with the
eyes of their spiritual body, the substances of light from the
Spiritual Sun entering their cognitive organ, and the substances of spiritual
heat entering their affective organ. They had a living perception of it entering
their mind and what effects it causes there in terms of their consequent
sensations, thoughts and feelings. Every individual experienced this in a uniquely variable
manner, and yet, they could each sense how the others experienced it, so that
together as a group or society, they were able to have a more perfect love and
understanding of God (see Section xx).
Through a more perfect understanding and love of God we can receive ever new
and higher sensations, thoughts and feelings to endless eternity. This is called heaven
(layers, 4, 5, 6).
These 12 layers of creation must be interconnected, or else God could not
manage the whole as one immense rational system (see Section xx). The functional
laws of interaction between the 12 layers are called the laws of
correspondences. These layers are also called discrete degrees (see
Section xx). Divine Speech is at level 1 and as it descends in the form of
spiritual heat and light, it creates each subsequent layer below. The layers are
connected by correspondence, which means cause-effect relations -- every detail
at the lower layer is called the effect, and every corresponding detail at the
next upper level, is called its cause.
Now look at the 12 layers again. Where in it would you place Sacred
Scripture?
The answer is layer 12. Are you surprised? Remember that Sacred Scripture is
a physical book or document which was caused by God to be written by an individual
whose mind He prepared for it. The process was experienced by the prophet either
as hearing words dictated by a "voice from heaven" or "an angel," or, by
organizing the individual's mind to think in a certain way, which is then
written
down. Either way, what the individual writes down is God's Speech or God's
Divine Truth or, what is the same, God's Rational Organ in which infinite truths
and intelligences make one. Sacred Scripture is God's Word to humankind, the source of Divine
Truth revealed to humankind. In Sacred Scripture infinite truths make one, that
is, are integrated into rational series that comprise a whole. This whole is
called heaven and it is the highest mental state in the mental world of the
human race, therefore, of every individual human being (layers 4, 5, 6).
But this is only half of the process by which correspondences create the mental
world of eternity and the physical world of time-space. You need to know the
other half of the description.
The physical document called Sacred Scripture (layer 12) is caused by
the natural mind (layers 7, 8, 9) of a particular individual with whom God initiates
this process of writing down Divine Speech in a natural language. The content of
our natural mind is cultural and social. Hence the content of Sacred
Scripture is cultural and historical, reflecting the civilization and
the geography of the individual engaged in this process with God. This
historical and cultural content forms the basis of religion. This means that
every religion has its own version of Sacred Scripture produced by an individual
from that culture whom God chose and prepared for that purpose.
Thus far in theistic psychology the following collections of Sacred
Scripture have been investigated:
-
The Old Testament Sacred Scripture (Jewish religion) (see Section xx)
-
The New Testament Sacred Scripture (Christian religion) (see Section xx)
-
The Writings Sacred Scripture (New Church religion) (see Section xx)
-
The Qu'ran Sacred Scripture (Islam religion) (see Section xx)
-
The Sacred Texts of Hinduism and Buddhism (see Section xx)
Other versions of Sacred Scripture will be researched in the future.
Definition of Sacred Scripture :
Sacred Scripture is Divine Speech or Truth transformed by layers of
correspondences, from the celestial-rational mind (third heaven -- layer4), to the spiritual-rational mind (second heaven
-- layer 5), to the spiritual-natural mind (first
heaven -- layer 6), and then, to the natural mind (layers 7, 8, 9), where we are conscious
of the literal meaning of the printed sentences (layer 12).
Look at the layers again:
-
Spiritual Sun --
spiritual light (Divine truth or rationality) and spiritual heat (Divine good
or love)
-
Heaven of human internals
-
Soul
-
Celestial-rational layer (affective, cognitive,
sensorimotor) (third heaven)
-
Spiritual-rational layer of our mind (affective, cognitive, sensorimotor)
(second heaven)
-
Spiritual-natural layer of our mind (affective, cognitive, sensorimotor)
(first heaven)
-
Natural-rational layer of our mind (affective, cognitive, sensorimotor)
-
Natural-sensual layer of our mind (affective, cognitive, sensorimotor)
-
Natural-corporeal layer of our mind (affective, cognitive, sensorimotor)
-
Spiritual body
-
Natural limbus
-
Physical body and planet
Layer 1 is the source of the mental substances of Divine Speech which is Proceeding
outward into the created universe, or
exteriorizing into creation. Layer 4 is the first Divine Proceeding that is
actually knowable to humanity. Every individual has immortal mental layers 3 to
10. While we are
still connected to the physical body (layer 12), we are conscious in the natural
mind (layers 7, 8, 9). Following resuscitation,
which occurs a few hours after the death of the physical body (layer 12), we are conscious
in our spiritual mind (layers 6, 5, 4). Both spiritual (5) and
celestial layers (4) are rational, but the celestial-rational (4) is higher than the
spiritual-rational (5). The natural-rational mind (layer 7) in which we are
conscious now on earth, is relatively
lower still. In our spiritual mind our human potential is far greater than in
our natural mind.
It is critical to realize that as the layers of correspondences descend or
exteriorize from 1 to 12, the immediately preceding layer (called the cause) lodges itself a
discrete degree within the next lower layer (called the effect). So
layer 3 (soul) is a discrete degree within layer 4 (celestial mind), which is within layer 5
(spiritual mind), which is
within layer 6 (spiritual-natural mind), which is within layer 7
(natural-rational mind). So by the time you are reading a book
of Sacred Scripture here on earth (layer 12) you are looking at the literal
content in a natural language and culture that has been transformed several
times by correspondences. The literal verses of Sacred
Scripture here on earth (layer 12) contain within them prior layers of correspondences.
Swedenborg demonstrated in detail how these hidden layers can be extracted from
the literal sense by means of the knowledge of correspondences. (see Section xx).
The content of Divine Speech changes from layer to layer, but all the layers
remain in correspondence with each other in an unbroken rational series.
The closest we can get
to the content of Divine Truth is the state of our heaven in the celestial mind
(layer 4). This mental state can
be reached following the mental state in which we are resuscitated. When we are in
our
"celestial" mental state, we can read the version of Sacred Scripture that the
communities and societies of the third heaven possess, as
witnessed many times by Swedenborg over the course of 27 years of dual
citizenship, being simultaneously conscious in both his natural mind and his
spiritual mind (see Section xx).
Swedenborg was able to observe how the content of Sacred Scripture actually
varied as he was allowed to travel in consciousness across all the layers of the
human mental world in eternity (layers 4 , 5, 6) (see Section xx).
This experimental situation allowed Swedenborg to compare the content of Sacred Scripture across the layers of the
human mind as Divine Speech descends across
the layers by correspondences. By comparing the specific changes in meaning of
particular verses of Sacred Scripture between one layer of the mental world and
another, Swedenborg was able to give an empirical demonstration and
analysis of the Old and New Testament Sacred Scriptures in terms of
correspondences (see Section xx). This has never happened before in the entire extensive
literature of Bible interpretation. The reason is that no one since the
spiritual race began, has had access to
correspondences until they were observed by Emanuel Swedenborg (1688-1772).
Religions
are based on the literal sense of the Sacred Scripture they were given by
God when each religion was founded. Since the literal sense is a historical and
cultural document, each religion has its own history and culture. Hence
religions are contrastive to each other, just like one language contrasts with
all other languages. Religions do not agree with each other because the
literal sense of their different Sacred Scripture varies and does not agree with
the literal sense of other Sacred Scripture.
Theistic psychology is not trying to conjoin religions or make
them fit together. Theistic psychology is not based on the literal
sense of Sacred Scripture. Hence, theistic psychology is not directly
relevant to religion and does not in any way affect religions.
However, we know from the Writings Sacred Scripture that all Sacred Scripture is
Divine Speech hidden across layers of correspondences.
Quoting from the Writings Sacred Scripture:
AC 5287. In the other life, especially in the heavens, all thought, and hence
all speech, are carried on by means of what is abstracted from persons, and
therefore thought and speech there are universal, and are relatively without
limit; for so far as thought and speech are determined to persons and their
specific qualities, and to names, and also to words, so far they become less
universal, and are determined to the actual thing, and there abide. On the
other hand, insofar as they are not determined to persons and what is
connected with them, but to realities abstracted from them, so far they are
determined away from the actual thing, and are extended beyond self, and the
mental view becomes higher and consequently more universal.
[2] This is very apparent from man's thought, which insofar as it regards the
words of one speaking, so far it does not regard his meaning; and which
insofar as it regards the particular things of the memory, and dwells on them,
so far it does not perceive the nature of the real things; and, still more
important, insofar as it regards itself in everything, so far it narrows the
thoughts and removes itself from viewing a subject in a universal manner.
Hence it is that in proportion as anyone loves himself more than others, in
the same proportion he is less wise. From this it is now plain why things
abstracted from persons are signified in the internal sense by the things
which in the sense of the letter are determined to persons (see also n. 5225).
(AC 5287)
1.1.4.3.2.2
Drinking Blood and Other Examples of
Correspondences in Sacred Scripture
Here is an example from the New Testament Sacred Scripture:
Except ye shall eat the flesh of the Son of man, and drink His blood, ye
have no life in you (John 6:53).
What does this mean? The Incarnated Divine Human is speaking here, referring to
Himself as "the Son of man," and commanding people to eat His flesh and drink
His blood. He was not encouraging cannibalism! Obviously the literal contains a
spiritual meaning that is hidden from the surface and must be figured out
rationally by the reader. The universal explanation over the past two thousand
years has been that Jesus is talking symbolically. Here is one example I found
on the Web:
From: Bible Tools. Commentaries on John 6:53
http://bibletools.org/index.cfm/fuseaction/Bible.show/sVerseID/26311/eVerseID/26315
Jesus Christ explains that both the eating of His flesh and the drinking of
His blood are required if we are to have eternal life. As we symbolically
drink His blood when we partake of the wine at Passover, we acknowledge our
individual part in the shedding of His blood, and reconciliation with God
occurs. But the process does not stop here. Once we are reconciled, we must
also feed on His flesh, His words, to gain eternal life. Still, this is not
enough—we must continually repeat this process as long as we live.
In other words people "symbolically drink His blood" when they celebrate the
death on the cross of the Incarnated God who spilled His blood for the sake of
humanity, that people may be able to live in the heavens of their mental
eternity, rather than their hells. This is called "salvation" of the human race.
According to the literal meaning of the New Testament Sacred Scripture the
Incarnated God (see Section xx) dying on the cross is to be compared with the
immolation or sacrifice of animals commanded by God in the Old Testament Sacred
Scripture as a religious practice instituted with priests. The sins of the
people were thus "laid upon the animals" as it were, like the "sacrificial
lamb," or other animals including oxen, goats, pigeons, etc. The priests were
commanded to sprinkle some of the blood of the sacrificed animals all around the
place, and other such ceremonies, as described and commanded in the Old
Testament Sacred Scripture. One of these ceremonies included the ritual eating
of designated portions of the flesh of the sacrificed animals (e.g., at the
"Passover meal"). However it was strictly forbidden for the people or the
priests to drink any blood.
It is in this religious, national, cultural, and historical context that God
incarnated as a Divine Human in a particular country in the Middle East more
than two thousand years ago,
offering Himself as the ultimate blood sacrifice for the sins of all humanity,
since the former sacrifices of animals ceased to be effective ritual methods
when people began to misuse them for insincere and commercial purposes. Such
rituals were endowed with Divine power as long as they were used sincerely, but
as soon as they became merely the object of religious politics and
commercialism, their Divine effectiveness ceased. Now humanity had no Divinely
prescribed method for saving them from these sins, which meant, going into the
hells of eternity.
In the context of theistic psychology the idea of "sin" is related to the evil
traits in our inherited character that we are unwilling to change because we
love them and enjoy them. As a result our spiritual mind is closed and cannot be
developed while we are still living in this life on earth. When we die and are
resuscitated we do not have a sufficiently functional spiritual mind and are
forced to function with our interior-natural mind (layer
7). This mind when it is not regenerated contains all the inherited and
acquired evils and enjoyments accumulated during our lifetime on earth in the
natural mind. The consequence is that we become spiritually insane and spend our
eternity in delusional and beastly mental states called "hell." The animal
sacrifices were a way that God had provided in ancient times for the removal of
these "sins" by giving "sinners" the opportunity to focus on their injurious
behaviors and repent, that is, make a resolution not to continue them. When
people did this sincerely, the Divine Psychologist was able to turn off their
inherited traits and provide heavenly traits. But when it was done insincerely,
just using the ritual to receive "forgiveness," not really repenting, then the
Divine Psychologist was unable to "save" them from their fate in hell.
Two thousand years ago God had to introduce or create a totally new method for
saving people from heading towards the hells in their minds. The Incarnation (or
physical birth) of
God as a human being on this earth and a citizen of a particular country, was
God's method of providing new ways of avoiding the hells after our
resuscitation. This new method involved the creation of a new mental organ in
our conscious natural mind (layer 7) (see Section xx). This organ is called the
interior-natural mind (layer 7). Every human being now possesses such an organ
from birth. In order to activate this organ the individual must study theistic
psychology in one form or another -- from Sacred Scripture or from instruction.
This interior-natural layer is
also called the natural-rational mind. It is the direct rational consciousness of God as explained in this Volume.
This conscious rational proof in our mind of God's existence and presence in our
mind, was not possible prior to the Incarnation Event, prior to the
evolution of the new interior-natural mind. As a result people had needed
physical proof of God's existence and presence in layers 12, 9, and 8). This was provided through
sacrifices, miracles, voices, interventions, visions, angels, prophets, and
other experiences of sensuous spirituality (layers 9 and 8), as this was
provided through the literal sense of
Sacred Scripture. When sensuous spirituality ceased to be Divinely effective due
to mental corruption and misuse, the new approach of rational spirituality began
(also called "Holy Spirit"). In order
to promote this approach God had to reveal the existence of the Science of
Correspondences that had lain hidden in the spiritual sense of Sacred Scripture.
The study of Theistic Psychology represents the full maturation of the new rational
approach God has created for humanity.
To allow the foundation of theistic psychology as a universal science it was
necessary for God to promote the development of scientific thinking, method, and
knowledge so that the human race
on this earth could become a modern civilization and learn scientific ideas in
their education and schooling. Such a modern scientifically educated mind became
possible when Swedenborg was born at the end of the 17th century when modern science and
public science education became a historical reality.
To drink God's blood as a representative ritual or symbol of His Self-sacrifice
on the cross, is a literal meaning even if it is called symbolic. The symbolic
meaning still retains the tradition of blood sacrifice as a religious method for
having one's sins forgiven or wiped away, as if the sins had never been
committed. You can see that the symbolic meaning is just as natural as the
literal meaning (both in layer 8). Both meanings are in the sensual and
corporeal mind (layers 8, 9) and have to do with the physical sensual world and how
things are done in the physical world, namely, sacrificing (killing) animals, sprinkling
blood, the Incarnated God nailed to the cross as a "sacrificial Lamb," and the other historical and
scientific details in the literal of the New Testament Sacred Scripture.
Contrast this sensual-corporeal approach (layers 8, 9) with the
correspondential spiritual meaning (layer 7) given in the Writings Sacred Scripture
as it discusses this
New Testament passage:
LORD 27. That the Lord [= the Incarnated Divine Human] is called "the
Son of man" when Redemption, Salvation, Reformation, and Regeneration are
treated of, is evident from these passages: [from the New Testament Sacred
Scripture]
The Son of man came to give His life a redemption for many (Matt. 20:28;
Mark 10:5).
The Son of man is come to save, and not to destroy (Matt. 18:11; Luke 9:56).
The Son of man is come to seek and save that which was lost (Luke 19:10).
The Son of man is come that the world through Him may be saved (John 3:17).
He that soweth the good seed is the Son of man (Matt. 13:37).
Redemption and salvation are here treated of, and as the Lord effects these by
means of the Word, He here calls Himself "the Son of man." The Lord says,
That the Son of man has power to forgive sins (Mark 2:10; Luke 5:24)
(that is, to save).
And also,
That He is the Lord of the Sabbath, because He is the Son of man (Matt.
12:8; Mark 2:28; Luke 6:5)
(i.e. because He is the Word, [= the meaning of Sacred Scripture in the
natural mind]
which He is Himself then teaching). [= He is the Divine Psychologist ("Holy
Spirit") in the
conscious natural mind of every human being]
He says, further, in John:
Labor not for the meat which perisheth, but for that meat which endureth
unto everlasting life, which the Son of man shall give unto you (John 6:27).
By "meat" is meant all truth and good of doctrine from the Word [=theistic
psychology], thus from
the Lord; and this is also meant there by the manna, and by the bread
which came down from heaven; and also by the following in the same chapter:
Except ye shall eat the flesh of the Son of man, and drink His blood, ye
have no life in you (John 6:53).
"Flesh," or "bread," is the good of love from the Word; "blood," or "wine," is
the good of faith from the Word, both from the Lord. (LORD 27)
You will note that the Writings Sacred Scripture present the correspondential
sense of the New Testament Sacred Scripture, not the symbolic meaning.
Thousands of proposals have been advanced regarding the meaning of obscure Bible
passages, all centering their focus on the symbolic interpretation. The fact is
that any person who believes in God and acknowledges the Bible as the Word of
God will automatically render a symbolic interpretation the literal sentences,
rather than imagine such awful things about what God ordered people to do.
Besides commanding people to "drink blood," God has talked about Himself in
terms that cannot be considered good or Divine. The Old Testament Sacred
Scripture frequently describes God's disgusted feeling with His "chosen people"
whom He was guiding to the good life. But when they disobeyed His commandments
repeatedly God throws a fit of rage and cries out how He hates His people, how
He regrets creating them, how He is going to take vengeance on them, and not
only on them but on their children, grand children, and subsequent generations.
This kind of description of God cannot possibly be taken literally if one
defines God as omnipotent, omniscient, and omnipresent Divine Love and Mercy, as
He is also described repeatedly in Sacred Scripture.
Further, when He forgave His chosen people and took their children into the
"Promised Land" that He gave to their ancestors, He commanded them to
exterminate the inhabitants that already lived in that land. bade them to
intermarry or even use their animals. He ordered them to kill men, women,
children, animals, and to burn everything down, before they would be allowed to
build their own cities. The mind of the average person today recoils at these
horrendous things Sacred Scripture says about God. So it is obvious that we must
give a symbolic interpretation, not a literal one. And many have been presented.
In fact millions of people who hear Christian sermons every Sunday are presented
with symbolic interpretations of the Bible passages that constitute the Lesson
for that week.
Remember that symbolic interpretations of the Bible passages are mental
operations of reasoning and thinking in layer 8, which is the exterior-natural
mind, also called the sensual mind or scientific mind. This is below layer 7,
the interior-natural mind, also called the rational mind. We need to remember
that "rational" in theistic psychology refers to thinking based on spiritual
truths from the correspondential sense of Sacred Scripture.
According to this definition nothing spiritually rational can be thought of
below layer 7, which is the layer that is in between the spiritual world of
eternity and the physical world of time-place. The content and basis of thinking
in the exterior-natural mind (layer 8) is materialistic by necessity since it is
in the negative bias mode, which denies the existence of something that is not
material in time and place. For example, when people who believe in "God's Word"
think about the afterlife, since this is promised there, they think of a heaven
on earth, and a resurrection of their physical body on earth, or some other
planet. They do not think of the afterlife as the mental world of eternity. If
Sacred Scripture were to say this and other such things as you are studying in
theistic psychology, few people would be left who would be willing to be good
and obey God's commandments. This is because they are thinking of the mental
world of eternity idea as worthless to them. In their materialistic thinking of
God they can only imagine a God who rewards you with physical goods, not just
mental.
It's only when we start thinking in layer 7 that we can begin to understand
substantive dualism, dual citizenship, and the resuscitation of the spiritual
mind in the mental world of eternity. We can then understand rationally (not
materialistically) that all our feelings, thoughts, and sensations are real in
their own world, that these are never here in the physical world of the brain or
the skin, which only form a covering for them (layers 11, 12). Once covering
disintegrates in the dying process (layer 12) while everything else remains.
Understanding these ideas requires that people inquire into the meaning of those
Bible passages at a spiritual level, and this is interior or higher (layer 7) to
the exterior (layer 8, materialistic spirituality).
Symbolic interpretation is necessary for the literal of Sacred Scripture, but
there are higher layers to be explored and received from God. This higher layer
is the understanding of Sacred Scripture in terms of correspondences. This new
understanding is progressive, starting with spiritual-natural correspondences
(layer 6C), continuing with spiritual-rational correspondences (layer 5C), and
finally with celestial-rational correspondences (layer 4C). Since these layers
of our mind remain unconscious until our resuscitation, God supplies us with a
conscious interior-natural mind that is capable of representing to itself all
the layers above. Even though these are only representations of the actual
higher correspondences in our upper layers, they are endowed by God with the
power to connect with those layers. The more we study and develop our rational
understanding of higher order correspondences in Sacred Scripture, the more
these higher layers of our mind can develop. This not only insures a life of
heaven in eternity, but we derive the benefits immediately in the conscious
natural mind.
But there is one hitch to this wonderful cognitive ability in our conscious
interior-natural mind. We construct invalid or corrupted representations, thus
useless for development, unless we are engaged in spiritual combat in our
regeneration. The degree of our regeneration imposes a limit on the degree of
our understanding. God has built into this a growth mechanism that protects us
from spiritual catastrophe. The Divine Psychologist allows us to understand
only those correspondences that we are not going to misuse and corrupt for
hellish purposes.
I have noticed in my years of regeneration and study of Sacred Scripture that
the correspondences I understand in one year deepen in subsequent years. Even
when I reread what I have written in the early days of constructing theistic
psychology, I get new, higher meaning out of it. Expressions and sentences are
such wonderful vehicles that they can contain an endless series of higher
meanings to be discovered gradually. Consider how correspondences work by
thinking of a some examples. You will discover that correspondences is a natural
way of thinking for us because we normally describe mental things by physical
things, and we do this in our daily thinking and speaking.
The correspondential sense of the
physical activity "to eat" (layer 12) is the mental activity of "to appropriate as our
own." "To drink" has a similar correspondential sense as "to eat" or "to
ingest." A physical act "to eat" or "to drink" corresponds to the mental act
of "to appropriate" or "to incorporate the information." "Flesh" in the physical
world corresponds to "good" or "love" in the mental world. "Blood" or "wine" correspond to spiritual truths
(in layers 7, 6, 5, 4, the interior layers), while "water"
corresponds to natural truths (in layer 8, the exterior sensual-scientific mind).
In
other words, physical flesh or bread offered in a sacrifice to God represents the "good of love,"
which in the mental world is the substance of spiritual heat that streams
out of the Spiritual Sun, and thence into the
mind of every human being (see Section xx). Similarly, physical blood or wine in
a sacrifice to God represents the "good of truth" (or rational faith). The
physical act of eating or drinking represents the process of "appropriation" by
which the good of love (received in our affective organ, A) is conjoined to the
good of truth received (in our cognitive organ, C) in our natural mind
throughout its layers. This only occurs during regeneration. And so Sacred
Scripture is telling us that unless we undergo regeneration ("eating flesh and
drinking blood") we cannot stop being hellish.
Note that this conclusion cannot be reached merely from the symbolic meaning of
the expressions. Knowledge of correspondences must be applied.
The "truths in Sacred
Scripture" are nothing but spiritual light streaming from the Spiritual Sun into
our cognitive organ. Spiritual heat as a substance is called "good" or "love"
when it is received by the affective organ of human beings. Spiritual light as a
substance is called "truth" or "wisdom" or "rationality" when it inflows into the cognitive
organ. Hence "to eat the flesh or meat of the Son of man," i.e., the "Divine
Human," has nothing to do with the physical act of eating from the sacrifices of
animals, which is its symbolic meaning. The correspondential meaning of
eating flesh or meat is to appropriate the spiritual heat from the Divine Human,
and this means to allow love into our heart or motivational and behavioral intentions. Similarly,
the correspondential meaning of drinking blood or wine is to appropriate the
spiritual light from the Divine Psychologist, and this means to allow spiritual truth
from Sacred Scripture in our mind
or thinking. This we do first in reformation, then in regeneration (see Section
xx).
The correspondential sense of "blood" is "spiritual light" or spiritual truth
(rational faith),
which only God can originate, coming from the Spiritual Sun. People cannot
construct or think any spiritual truths
in the exterior-natural layer of the mind (8), where only
natural truths can operate. This is why that layer is called the sensual or
scientific mind, meaning that all its contents is based on sensory input through
the physical body, leading the negative bias in science and materialism in
everyday thinking and reasoning. Materialism either opposes the idea of God or
turns it into a materialistic concept (anti-dualism, anti-eternity,
anti-spiritual mind).
Spiritual
truths involve concepts that describe the reality of the mental world of
eternity, and since no one has conscious access to that world until
resuscitation, it is clear that these facts about our life in eternity must be
revealed through Sacred Scripture. A theistic science could not make its
appearance until modern civilization began in the 18th century,
which is when the Writings of Swedenborg were published (see Section xx). There
was no use making these scientific revelations to humanity until people had
enough of a rational outlook to be able to adopt the positive bias in science.
Rational proof of God can only be given in rational consciousness, not sensuous
consciousness.
Once the correspondential sense of Sacred Scripture was revealed, along
with its scientific concepts and principles (see Section xx), it became possible
for scientific thinking to access the empirical facts about the mental world of
eternity, which is our afterlife of immortality. The physical matter of blood corresponds to the mental substance of
spiritual truth received in the cognitive organ (layer 7C) as spiritual light substance
streaming in from the Spiritual Sun, both directly into layer 7C and indirectly
through the upper layers that we share with those who are already in eternity
(see "Vertical Community" in Section xx). Hence, to "drink the blood of the Son of
man" has nothing to do with drinking or with sacrifices (as in their
literal and symbolic meaning). It has to do with
appropriating spiritual-rational information to one's conscious natural mind
(7C),
and hence to make spiritual truths part of our thinking in daily life and in
science (layer 8C). This is what God is telling us when we see in the literal of Sacred
Scripture the commandment to "drink His blood and eat His flesh."
Now consider the following illustrations from the Old Testament Sacred Scripture
as discussed in the Writings Sacred Scripture. It proves that "flesh" and
"blood" are used as correspondences for spiritual "good" and "truth" throughout
the Old Testament Sacred Scripture as well, not just in that passage. This is
important because it proves that we are not just making an arbitrary
interpretation of that one passage.
Quoting from the Writings Sacred Scripture:
AC 3813. As regards "flesh," in the supreme sense it signifies the own of the
Lord's Divine Human [= His affective organ], which is Divine
good [ = spiritual heat ], and in the relative sense it signifies the own of man's will
[ = affective organ ] made alive
by the own of the Divine Human, that is, by His Divine good
[ = when we are
resuscitated and enter our heavenly layer, our feelings are personal
adaptations of God's feelings in each of us ].
This own is what is called the heavenly own [ = our personality in
layers 6, 5, 4 ], which in itself is the Lord's alone
appropriated to those who are in good, and thence in truth [ = our thoughts
and feelings are personal adaptations to God's thoughts and feelings ].
Such an own have the angels who are in the heavens [= our mental states in
layers 6, 5, 4 ], and men who as to their interiors or as
to the spirit are in the Lord's kingdom [= when we are regenerating our
inherited character through the truths in our conscious natural mind ]. But
in the opposite sense, "flesh" signifies the own of man's will, which in
itself is nothing but evil [ = from inheritance ], and not being vivified by the Lord is called
"dead," and thus the man himself is said to be dead [= prior to
regeneration we have our inherited character which is connected to the hells
in our mind. To be in hell is called to be dead.] (...)
[3] The same was represented in the Jewish Church [= the literal sense of
the Old Testament Sacred Scripture ] by the ordinance that Aaron, his sons,
and they who sacrificed, and others who were clean, might eat the flesh of the
sacrifices, and that this was holy (Exod. 12:7-9; 29:30-34; Lev. 7:15-21;
8:31; Deut. 12:27; 16:4). If therefore an unclean person ate of that flesh, he
was to be cut off from his people (Lev. 7:21). (That these sacrifices were
called "bread," may be seen above, n. 2165.) That "flesh" was called the
"flesh of holiness" (Jer. 11:15; Haggai 2:12), and the "flesh of the offering
which was on the tables in the Lord's kingdom," see Ezek. 40:43, where the new
temple is described, by which there is evidently signified the worship of the
Lord in His kingdom. (...)
[5] (...) They who know the internal sense, know that they shall come into the
other life with a body, but a purer one [ = spiritual body, layer 10 ]; for in the other life there are purer
bodies [ = not made of physical matter but of immortal substances ]; for they
[ = once we are resuscitated in the spiritual body ] see each other, converse together, and enjoy every sense as
in the present body, but in a more exquisite degree. The body [ = physical
body, layer 12 ] which man
carries about here on earth is for uses on earth, and therefore consists of
bones and flesh [ = from physical matter ] ; and the body which the spirit carries about in the other life
is designed for uses in that life, and does not consist of bones and flesh,
but of things which correspond to them [ = bones and flesh from
spiritual substances ] (n. 3726).
[6] That in the opposite sense "flesh" signifies the own of man's will, which
in itself is nothing but evil, is evident from the following passages. In
Isaiah:
They shall eat every man the flesh of his own arm (Isa. 9:20).
I will feed their oppressors with their own flesh; and they shall be drunken
with their own blood, as with new wine (Isa. 49:26).
In Jeremiah:
I will feed them with the flesh of their sons, and the flesh of their
daughters, and they shall eat everyone the flesh of his companion (Jer.
19:9).
In Zechariah:
Let those who are left eat everyone the flesh of another (Zech. 11:9).
In Moses:
I will chastise you seven* times for your sins; and ye shall eat the flesh
of your sons; and the flesh of your daughters shall ye eat (Lev. 26:28-29).
The own of man's will, that is, the nature of man, is thus described, for this
is nothing else than evil and the derivative falsity; thus is hatred against
truths and goods, which is signified by "eating the flesh of his arm, the
flesh of sons and daughters, and the flesh of a companion."
[7] In John: [New Testament Sacred Scripture]
I saw an angel standing in the sun; and he cried with a great voice,
saying to all the birds that fly in the midst of heaven, Come and gather
yourselves together to the supper of the great God, that ye may eat the
flesh of kings, and the flesh of captains, and the flesh of mighty men, and
the flesh of horses and of them that sit thereon, and the flesh of all both
free and bond, both small and great (Rev. 19:17-18; Ezek. 39:17-20);
that here by the "flesh of kings, of captains, of mighty men, of horses and of
those that sit upon them, of all, both free and bond," are not signified such
things as these, must be evident to everyone; thus that by "flesh" are
signified other things which have hitherto been unknown. That evils which are
from falsities, and evils from which are falsities, both from the own of man's
will, are signified, is manifest from the several expressions.
[8] As in the internal sense the falsity which results from the own of man's
understanding is "blood"; and as the evil which results from the own of his
will is "flesh," therefore the Lord speaks as follows concerning the man who
is to be regenerated:
As many as received, to them gave He power to become the sons of God, even
to them that believe in His name; who were born, not of bloods, nor of the
will of the flesh, nor of the will of man, but of God (John 1:12-13). [New
Testament Sacred Scripture]
Hence it is that by "flesh" in general is meant every man (see n. 574, 1050);
for whether you say man, or man's own, it is the same thing. (...) (AC
3813)
You can see from these illustrations that correspondences are universal and fixed
by creation.
They do not depend on subjective or personal interpretation, as with the
symbolic meaning or interpretations that various scholars have offered for these
strange passages. Consequently correspondences do not change. They are the same
regardless who the prophet is because they don't depend on the prophet's
understanding or thinking.
The prophets who
wrote pieces of Sacred Scripture received the words they wrote down purely by
inspiration. They did not know what the words meant or even that they were
correspondences. Nor were they familiar with what other prophets had written
earlier or subsequently. Hence the fact that all these writers over several
centuries independently wrote by the same correspondences,
constitutes scientific proof that Sacred Scripture is Divine Speech laid down in
correspondences (see Section xx). Try if you can to think of another
explanation for this agreement in correspondences.
Further, correspondences are not
symbolic or figurative expressions. Correspondences are laws between cause and
effect. Every mental state or property has a correspondence with some specific
property of a physical object or event. The mental property is the cause
while the physical property or event is the effect.
With this principle you can see how Sacred Scripture contains a literal and
symbolic meaning on the surface, and a spiritual or correspondential meaning
hidden in its deeper layers of meaning. These hidden layers discuss a different
topic than the surface layers. As indicated above in the illustrations, the
surface literal meaning may be discussing sacrifices, blood, rituals, and eating
flesh, while the deeper spiritual layers are discussing theistic psychology, the
anatomy of the mind, character reformation, life in heaven and hell, etc.
Clearly there is no hint from the natural world surface topics what are the
mental eternity topics that lay hidden within. Until the laws of correspondences were revealed in the
Writings Sacred Scripture in the 18th century, scholars could only speculate and
hypothesize and make wild guesses as to the meaning or message in the visionary
scenes described in the Old and New Testament Sacred Scriptures. It is the same
with other Sacred Scriptures.
This speculative or symbolic approach is continuing today since there is not yet
an interest or knowledge in
the Writings of Swedenborg. Hence authors today continue to publish dozens of
new books every year giving their latest theories of what the last book of the
Bible means. This Book of Sacred Scripture is called The Book of Revelation and
also The Apocalypse. If you google these titles you will see the amazing frenzy
of intellectual activity devoted to trying to penetrate this topic. It
appears from the literal meaning and the symbolic meaning that John's Book of Revelation
in the Bible is talking about the "end of times." This is the theory
that the physical world will end sooner or later because that's what the Book of
Revelation seems to say. Then, after the predetermined time, the physical world
is recreated, but this time without the blemishes. This idea is also supported by several passages in
the New Testament and Old Testament Sacred Scriptures that appear to discusses the end of times
(destruction and recreation of the physical world).
You can research all this very easily on the Web with google. After that you
will have more of a context to contrast with theistic psychology.
All this shows definitively that no one can come up with correspondences on
their own and give a coherent rational account of the Book of Revelation, as
well as hundreds of other visionary passages in the Old and New Testament Sacred
Scriptures. Swedenborg made a careful study of these passages and compared them
to the wording of Sacred Scripture that he found in the spiritual layer (5) of the
mental world, and also above that, in the celestial layer (4). If you would be able
to become conscious in your spiritual mind right now, you too would be able to
make that comparison, as long as you retained your conscious awareness in the
natural mind, as happened to Swedenborg. But without this simultaneous dual
consciousness it would not be possible to empirically discover correspondences.
For instance, Swedenborg was surprised at first to discover that people who are
already conscious in their celestial layer (4) of the mind in eternity -- he called
them "angels" -- are far more intelligent than we are here in our natural mind,
yet they too did not know that their Sacred Scripture was written in
correspondences (celestial-rational). This is because the natural mind, with all its memories of
Sacred Scripture and etc., becomes unconscious when we complete the
resuscitation process at our second death and enter the celestial layer of
immortal conjugial life (see Section xx).
When we read Sacred Scripture in our interior-natural mind (layer 7) the meanings we are
conscious of are totally different in content from the meaning of Sacred
Scripture in our exterior-natural mind (layer 8). The difference is as we have discussed above,
namely, that all references and topics to names of places, natural objects,
numbers, natural ideas about countries, government, kings, etc., do not appear
at all in the correspondential sense. Instead, their correspondences appear.
Instead of "blood" or "wine" there appears "truths" of different kind, and
instead of the number "10" there appears the word "remains" which refers to the
heavenly mental states in our life on earth that the Divine Psychologist stores up for us to enjoy in
our heavenly immortality (layers 4, 5, 6) (see Section xx). Instead of the names of places on
this earth like "Jerusalem" or "Egypt" or "Syria" there appear
references to the mental states
to which these names correspond, e.g., our principles of life based on Sacred
Scripture ("Jerusalem"), our materialistic thinking and negative bias
approach in science ("Egypt"),
or positive bias approach applied to Sacred Scripture ("Syria").
You can see why no one over the centuries could come up with these correspondences on their own,
especially since they don't know the details of the mental world.
It is revealed
in the Writings Sacred Scripture that the names of places mentioned in the Old
Testament Sacred Scripture were given to those places by a more ancient
generation that inhabited that portion of the Middle East. This ancient
civilization still had left over knowledge of correspondences and they assigned names to
geographic places according to natural representatives to mental correspondences. As a result, when the Old
Testament prophets wrote about the events of the day in relation to God, they
mentioned those names of places where the historical events took place. This is how
those names became part of
Sacred Scripture, and by Divine foresight and management, the events and the
places where they took place, corresponded to spiritual information. In this way there was
an unbroken rational series in the correspondential sense of the narrative of
Sacred Scripture. The organized and integrated knowledge of these rational
series is what we call today "theistic psychology."
Another amazing aspect to correspondences is that they give a scientifically
powerful description of mental states, and this information has been sought
after since the beginning of literature and science. Think about a dictionary.
It's an alphabetical listing with definitions and examples of the various mental
compartments we have when we are cultured and educated. What's the difference
between saying "I prefer to take this one." and "I'll take this one." They are
close or synonymous, and yet there is a difference. Try to get a sense of the
difference. These two sentences refer to two different mental states. The dictionary
defines the
words and expressions, which are nothing but references to mental states (e.g.,
"I am angry" vs. "I am content," or "I don't want to eat now." vs. "I'm
pretending to eat."). These physical actions are
expressions for mental states and when people speak this way they are interested
in the mental states or meaning of what's being said.
Think of a Thesaurus. It too is an arrangement of words and expressions, but
instead of an alphabetical arrangement it is hierarchical, made of categories
within categories so that all the words in a language belong to some category. What are
these categories? They are references to mental states. So the Thesaurus is a
map of our cognitive organ where all these mental distinctions are constructed.
The branch of the science of linguistics called semantics consists of theories
and observations about how meanings are constructed and arranged in the
cognitive organ of our natural mind. Now we know that this arrangement of mental
operations in our natural mind (layers 7, 8) is a correspondence of the mental operations in
our spiritual mind (layers 6, 5), and this in turn is an arrangement by correspondence in our
celestial mind (layer 4), and this in turn is an arrangement by correspondence caused by
the arrangement in God's Cognitive Organ, as expressed through the Spiritual Sun
(layer 1) (see Section xx).
From this you can see that God creates and manages all details of the dual
universe by means of a top down series of correspondences (layers
1 through 12). This is God's way of
proceeding by rational science. Correspondences must be in Sacred Scripture
because the physical book of Sacred Scripture and its meaning in the natural
mind are both effects produced by correspondence.
You can also now see this amazing thing: that the knowledge of correspondences
gives you power that you don't have without it.
Note: The topic of correspondences in Sacred Scripture continues in
Section
1.8.8.1.
1.1.4.3.2.3
Metaphors, Symbolism, Simile, Figurative Speech -- Are Not
Correspondences
Metaphoric language or figurative speech is to use physical objects or
properties to describe other physical objects and properties. For example, a
famous metaphor that appears in Shakespeare's Romeo and Juliet is "Juliet
is the sun." Most people translate this as "Juliet is like the sun."
Explanations given include the idea that to her lover, the young woman's face
appears bright from love and shines like the sun. One physical object (her face)
is described through another physical object (the sun). In the expression "It's
raining cats and dogs" heavy rain is likened to cats and dogs falling from the
sky. Here is one explanation I found for this expression:
The most favoured one in the references I have found is mythological. It seems
that cats were at one time thought to have influence over storms, especially
by sailors, and that dogs were symbols of storms, often accompanying images
and descriptions of the Norse storm god Odin. So when some particularly
violent tempest appeared, people suggested it was caused by cats (bringing the
rain) and dogs (the wind).
Michael Quinion. World Wide Words at:
http://www.worldwidewords.org/qa/qa-rai1.htm
Notice that these descriptions discuss how one physical thing (heavy storm) is
related to another physical thing (cats and dogs). Here are some more examples,
as the subject is presented to teachers:
From:
http://specialed.about.com/od/literacy/a/figurative.htm
Figurative Speech/Language comes in many forms:
Simile (Comparisons often with as or
like): As smooth as silk, as fast as the wind.
Metaphor (Implicit comparison without like or as)): You're such an
airhead. It's bursting
with flavor.
Hyperbole (Exaggerating a statement) In order to get my assignment
done, I'll have to
burn the midnight oil.
Personification (Giving something a human quality) The sun smiled
down on me...The
leaves danced in the wind.
Figures of Speech Phrases:
At the drop of a hat.
Axe to grind.
Back to square one.
Bells and whistles.
Bed of roses.
Burn the midnight oil.
Clean sweep.
Chew the fat.
Cold feet.
Coast is clear.
Down in the dumps.
Ears are burning.
Forty winks.
Full of beans. Give me a break.
Give my right arm.
In a nutshell/pickle.
In the bag.
It's greek to me.
Final straw.
Let the cat out of the bag.
Long shot.
Mum's the word.
On the ball.
Out on a limb.
Pass the buck.
Pay through the nose.
Read between the lines.
Saved by the bell.
Spill the beans.
Take a rain check.
Through the grapevine.
True colors.
Under the weather.
Up my sleeve.
Upset the apple cart.
Walking on eggshells.
Figurative VS Literal Language From Sue Watson
at:
http://specialed.about.com/od/literacy/a/figurative.htm
Now you can see from all this that figurative speech is not correspondence. For
instance, the last entry above, Walking on eggshells, relates two
physical things: (1) how we walk normally, and (2) how we walk when we are
walking on egg shells and don't' want to break them. These two physical things
give no clue to what people mean when they use this figure of speech. It takes
awhile for children to learn figures of speech like this one. People use it to
mean that they have to be very careful at what they are doing so they don't
disturb or offend someone who is sensitive. Another expression above, Under
the weather, is used to mean that we are sick. The expression Pass the
buck, is used by people in the sense of not taking responsibility for
something when it appears that they should.
Now let's consider some correspondences from Sacred Scripture. Wherever "water"
is mentioned in some form -- e.g., ocean, spring rain, river, storm, flood,
well, fountain -- the spiritual layer mentions some operation in the cognitive
organ -- e.g., truth, intelligence, wisdom, doctrine, understanding, rationality
and in their opposites senses -- falsification of truth, lack of rationality,
fantasy, persuasion, dogma. You can see that a correspondence unites
something physical (water) to something mental or eternal (truth, rationality).
Another instance was discussed above: whenever Sacred Scripture mentions "flesh"
the correspondence referred to is good or spiritual heat in the affective organ,
and whenever "blood" or "wine" is mentioned in Sacred Scripture, the
correspondential meaning indicated is spiritual truth as distinguished from
natural truth (water). whenever Sacred Scripture mentions "death" or "passing
on" the correspondent meaning is resuscitation in eternity. Whenever a "sword"
or "knife" is mentioned, the correspondential sense is the mental struggle we
experience during temptation when we use some truth we know to convince
ourselves not to do something bad. The sword fights against enemies, and truth
fights against evil traits.
Here are some things about correspondences that are revealed in the Writings
Sacred Scripture:
AC 2987.
2987. CONCERNING REPRESENTATIONS AND CORRESPONDENCES.
Few know what representations and correspondences are, nor can anyone know
this unless he knows that there is a spiritual world, and this distinct from
the natural world; for there exists a correspondence between spiritual things
and natural things, and the things that come forth from spiritual things in
natural ones are representations. They are called correspondences because they
correspond, and representations because they represent.
AC 2988.
2988. That some idea may be formed of representations and correspondences, it
is only necessary to reflect on the things of the mind, that is, of the
thought and will. These things so beam forth from the face that they are
manifest in its expression; especially is this the case with the affections,
the more interior of which are seen from and in the eyes. When the things of
the face act as a one with those of the mind, they are said to correspond, and
are correspondences; and the very expressions of the face represent, and are
representations. The case is similar with all that is expressed by the
gestures of the body, and with all the acts produced by the muscles; for it is
well known that all these take place according to what the man is thinking and
willing. The gestures and actions themselves, which are of the body, represent
the things of the mind, and are representations; and in that they are in
agreement, they are correspondences.
AC 2989.
2989. It may also be known that such forms do not exist in the mind as are
exhibited in the expression, but that they are merely affections which are
thus effigied; also that such acts do not exist in the mind as are exhibited
by the acts of the body, but that it is thoughts which are thus figured. The
things which are of the mind are spiritual, but those of the body are natural.
From this it is evident that there exists a correspondence between spiritual
things and natural things, and that there is a representation of spiritual
things in natural things; or what is the same, when the things of the internal
man are effigied in the external man, then the things that appear in the
external man are representative of the internal man; and the things that agree
are correspondences.
AC 2990.
2990. It is also known, or may be known, that there is a spiritual world, and
also a natural world. In the universal sense the spiritual world is where
spirits and angels dwell; and the natural world is where men dwell. In
particular, there is a spiritual world and a natural world with every man: his
internal man being to him a spiritual world, and his external man being to him
a natural world. The things that flow in from the spiritual world and are
presented in the natural world, are in general representations; and insofar as
they agree they are correspondences.
AC 2991.
2991. That natural things represent spiritual things, and that they
correspond, may also be known from the fact that what is natural cannot
possibly come forth except from a cause prior to itself. Its cause is from
what is spiritual; and there is nothing natural which does not thence derive
its cause. Natural forms are effects; nor can they appear as causes, still
less as causes of causes, or beginnings; but they receive their forms
according to the use in the place where they are; and yet the forms of the
effects represent the things which are of the causes; and indeed these latter
things represent those which are of the beginnings. Thus all natural things
represent those which are of the spiritual things to which they correspond;
and in fact the spiritual things also represent those which are of the
celestial things from which they are.
AC 2992.
2992. It has been given me to know from much experience that in the natural
world and its three kingdoms there is nothing whatever that does not represent
something in the spiritual world, or that has not something there to which it
corresponds. Besides many other experiences, this was made evident also from
the following.
On several occasions when I was speaking of the viscera of the body, and was
tracing their connection from those which are of the head to those which are
of the chest, and so on to those which are of the abdomen, the angels that
were above me led my thoughts through the spiritual things to which those
viscera correspond, and this so that there was not the least error. They
thought not at all of the viscera of the body of which I was thinking, but
only of the spiritual things to which these correspond. Such is the
intelligence of angels that from spiritual things they know all things in the
body in general and particular, even the most secret things, such as can never
come to man's knowledge; nay, they know everything there is in the universal
world, without a mistake; and this because from spiritual things are the
causes, and the beginnings of causes.
AC 2993.
2993. The case is similar with the things in the vegetable kingdom; for
nothing whatever exists there that does not represent something in the
spiritual world, and correspond thereto; as has been frequently given me to
know by a like interaction with angels. The causes also have been told me,
namely, that the causes of all natural things are from spiritual things, and
the beginnings of these causes are from celestial things; or what is the same,
all things in the natural world derive their cause from truth which is the
spiritual, and their beginning from good which is the celestial; and natural
things proceed thence according to all the differences of truth and of good in
the Lord's kingdom; thus from the Lord Himself, from whom is all good and
truth. These things must needs appear strange, especially to those who will
not or cannot ascend in thought beyond nature, and who do not know what the
spiritual is, and therefore do not acknowledge it.
AC 2994.
2994. So long as he lives in the body, man can feel and perceive but little of
this; for the celestial and spiritual things with him fall into the natural
things in his external man, and he there loses the sensation and perception of
them. Moreover the representatives and correspondences in his external man are
such that they do not appear like the things in the internal man to which they
correspond, and which they represent; therefore neither can they come to his
knowledge until he has put off those external things. When this happens,
blessed is the man who is in correspondence, that is, whose external man
corresponds to his internal man.
AC 2995.
2995. As the men of the Most Ancient Church (concerning whom see n. 1114-1125)
in every thing of nature saw something spiritual and celestial, insomuch that
natural things served them merely as objects for thought about spiritual and
celestial things, they were for this reason able to speak with angels, and to
be with them in the Lord's kingdom in the heavens at the same time that they
were in His kingdom on earth, that is, in the church. Thus with them natural
things were conjoined with spiritual things, and wholly corresponded. But it
was otherwise after those times, when evil and falsity began to reign; that
is, when after the golden age there commenced the iron age; for then as there
was no longer any correspondence, heaven was closed; insomuch that men were
scarcely willing to know that there was anything spiritual; and at last even
that there is a heaven and a hell, and a life after death.
AC 2996.
2996. In this world it is a great secret, although in the other life nothing
is better known to every spirit, that all things in the human body have a
correspondence to those in heaven; insomuch that there is not the smallest
particle in the body, to which something spiritual and celestial does not
correspond; or what is the same, to which heavenly societies do not
correspond, for these exist according to all the genera and species of
spiritual and celestial things; and this in such an order that together they
represent one man, even as to all his parts, in general and in particular,
both the interior and the exterior.
Hence it is that the universal heaven is also called the Grand Man; and hence
it is that it has been so often said that one society belongs to one province
of the body, another to another, and so on. The reason is that the Lord is the
Only Man, and heaven represents Him; and the Divine good and truth that are
from Him are what make heaven; and because the angels are therein, they are
said to be in the Lord. But they who are in hell are outside this Grand Man,
and correspond to things unclean, and also to bodily corruptions.
AC 2997.
2997. This may also in some degree be known from the fact that the spiritual
or internal man (which is man's spirit and is called his soul) has in like
manner a correspondence to his natural or external man; and that this
correspondence is of such a nature that the things of the internal man are
spiritual and celestial, while the things of the external man are natural and
corporeal; as may appear from what was said above (n. 2988, 2989) about the
expressions of the face and the acts of the body. Moreover as to his internal
man, man is a little heaven, because created after the Lord's image.
AC 2998.
2998. That such correspondences exist has become so familiar to me in the
course of years that hardly anything can be more so; though the fact itself is
such that man does not know of its existence, nor believes that he has any
connection with the spiritual world; when yet all his connection is from this
correspondence; and without this connection neither himself nor any part of
him could subsist a moment; for all his subsistence is from it. It has also
been given me to know what angelic societies belong to each province of the
body, and also of what quality they are; as for instance what societies and of
what quality belong to the province of the heart; what and of what quality to
the province of the lungs; what and of what quality to the province of the
liver; and also what and of what quality belong to the different sensories, as
to the eye, to the ears, to the tongue, and the rest; concerning which, of the
Lord's Divine mercy we shall speak singly.
AC 2999.
2999. Moreover nothing is possible in the created world that has not a
correspondence to the things in the spiritual world, and therefore that does
not in its own manner represent something in the Lord's kingdom. From this
comes the existence and subsistence of all things. If man knew how these
things are circumstanced, he would never as is his wont attribute all things
to nature.
AC 3000.
3000. Hence it is that all things in the universe both in general and in
particular represent the Lord's kingdom; insomuch that the universe with all
its constellations, atmospheres, and three kingdoms, is nothing else than a
kind of theater representative of the Lord's glory which is in the heavens. In
the animal kingdom not only man, but also each particular animal, even the
least and lowest, is representative; as for instance the little creatures that
creep on the ground and feed on plants; these, when their time for wedding is
at hand, become chrysalises, and presently, being supplied with wings they
soar from the ground into the atmosphere, their heaven, and there enjoy their
delight and their freedom, sporting together and feeding on the spoils of the
flowers, laying their eggs and thus providing for a posterity; and being then
in their state of heaven, they are also in their beauty. Everyone can see that
these things are representative of the Lord's kingdom.
AC 3001.
3001. That there is one only life, that of the Lord, which flows in and causes
man to live, whether he be good or evil, is evident from what has been said
and shown above, in the explication of the Word (n. 1954, 2021, 2536, 2658,
2706, 2886-2889). To that life correspond the recipient things which are
vivified by that Divine influx, and this in such a manner that they appear to
themselves to live from themselves. This correspondence is that of life with
the recipients of life. Such as are the recipients, so they live; those men
who are in love and charity are in correspondence, for they are in agreement,
and the life is received by them adequately; but those who are in things
contrary to love and charity are not in correspondence, because the life
itself is not received adequately; hence they have an appearance of life in
accordance with their quality.
This may be illustrated by many things; as by the organs of motion and of
sense in the body, into which the life flows through the soul; according to
the qualities of these, such are their actions and sensations. The same may be
illustrated also by the objects into which light flows from the sun; the light
producing colorings according to the quality of the recipient forms. But in
the spiritual world all the modifications that come into existence from the
influx of life are spiritual, whence come such differences of intelligence and
wisdom.
AC 3002.
3002. From this also we can see how all natural forms, both animate and
inanimate, are representative of spiritual and celestial things in the Lord's
kingdom; that is, that in nature all things, in both general and particular,
are representative in accordance with the measure and quality of their
correspondence.
AC 3213.
3213. CONTINUATION CONCERNING REPRESENTATIONS AND CORRESPONDENCES.
In the world of spirits there come forth innumerable and almost continual
representatives, which are forms of actual things spiritual and celestial, not
unlike those which are in the world. Whence these come it has been granted to
me to know by daily interaction with spirits and angels. They inflow from
heaven, and from the ideas and speech of the angels there; for the ideas of
angels and their derivative speech, when they come down to spirits, are
exhibited representatively in various ways. From these representations upright
and well-disposed spirits are enabled to know what the angels are saying among
themselves, for inwardly within the representatives there is something
angelic, which, in consequence of its power to excite affection, is perceived
even as to its quality.
Angelic ideas and speech cannot be exhibited before spirits in any other way;
for as compared with the idea of a spirit an angelic idea contains things
illimitable; and unless it were formed and exhibited representatively, and
thus visibly by images, a spirit would scarcely understand anything of its
contents, which are for the most part unutterable. But when the ideas are
represented by forms, then insofar as the more general things are concerned
they become comprehensible to spirits. And wonderful to say there is not even
the smallest thing in that which is represented which does not express
something spiritual and celestial that is in the idea of the angelic society
from which the representative flows down.
AC 3214.
3214. Representatives of things spiritual and celestial sometimes come forth
in a long series, continued for an hour or two, in such an order successively
as is marvelous. There are societies in which these representatives take
place; and it has been given me to be with them for many months. But these
representations are of such a nature that it would take many pages to relate
and describe a single one of them in its order. They are very delightful, for
something new and unexpected continually follows in succession, and this until
what is represented is being fully perfected; and when all things have been
perfectly represented, it is possible to contemplate everything in one view;
and then it is at the same time given to take note of what is signified by
each detail. Moreover good spirits are in this way initiated into spiritual
and celestial ideas.
AC 3215.
3215. The representatives that come forth before spirits are of an incredible
variety; yet they are for the most part similar to things which exist on the
earth, in its three kingdoms. (For the better understanding of their nature,
see what has been related above concerning them, n. 1521, 1532, 1619-1625,
1807, 1808, 1971, 1974, 1977, 1980, 1981, 2299, 2601, 2758.)
AC 3216.
3216. In order that it may be still better known how the case is with
representatives in the other life, that is, with those things which appear in
the world of spirits, take some further examples. When the angels are speaking
about the doctrinal things of charity and faith, then sometimes in a lower
sphere, where there is a corresponding society of spirits, there appears the
form or pattern of a city or cities, with palaces therein exhibiting such
skill in architecture as is amazing, so that you would say that the very art
itself was there in its native home; not to mention houses of varied aspect;
and wonderful to say in all these objects both in general and in particular
there is not the smallest point, or visible atom, that does not represent
something of the angelic idea and speech: so that it is evident what
innumerable things are contained in these; and also what is signified by the
cities seen by the prophets in the Word; and likewise what by the holy city or
New Jerusalem; and what by the cities in the prophetic Word; namely, the
doctrinal things of charity and faith (n. 402, 2449).
AC 3217.
3217. When the angels are discoursing of that which relates to the
understanding, then in the world of spirits, beneath the angels, or in the
corresponding societies, there appear horses; and these of a size, form,
color, attitude, and varied equipment, in accordance with the ideas which the
angels have concerning the understanding. There is also a place at some depth
a little to the right, which is called the abode of the intelligent, where
horses continually appear, and this by reason of those present being in
thought about what is of the understanding; and when angels whose discourse is
about this subject flow into their thoughts, there is a representation of
horses. This shows what was signified by the horses seen by the prophets, and
also by the horses mentioned elsewhere in the Word; namely, the things of the
understanding (n. 2760-2762).
AC 3218.
3218. When the angels are in affections, and are at the same time discoursing
about them, then in the lower sphere among spirits such things fall into
representative species of animals. When the discourse is about good
affections, there are presented beautiful, tame, and useful animals, such as
were used in sacrifice in the representative Divine worship in the Jewish
Church-as lambs, sheep, kids, she-goats, rams, he-goats, calves, bullocks,
oxen; and then whatever appears upon the animal presents some image of their
thought, which it is given to upright and well-disposed spirits to perceive.
This shows what was signified by the animals that were employed in the rites
of the Jewish Church; and what by the same when mentioned in the Word; namely,
affections (n. 1823, 2179, 2180). But the discourse of the angels about evil
affections is represented by beasts that are repulsive, fierce, and useless,
such as tigers, bears, wolves, scorpions, serpents, mice, and the like; and
these affections are also signified by the same beasts in the Word.
AC 3219.
3219. When the angels are conversing about knowledges, and ideas, and influx,
there then appear in the world of spirits as it were birds, formed in
accordance with the subject of their discourse. Hence it is that in the Word
"birds" signify rational things, or those which are of thought (see n. 40,
745, 776, 991). There were once presented to my view birds, one dark and
unsightly, but two noble and beautiful; and when I saw them, there then fell
upon me some spirits with such violence as to strike a tremor into my nerves
and bones. I imagined that then, as several times before, evil spirits were
assaulting me, with intent to destroy me; but this was not the case; for when
the tremor ceased, together with the emotion of the spirits who fell upon me,
I spoke with them, asking what was the matter.
[2] They said that they had fallen down from a certain angelic society in
which there was discourse concerning thoughts and influx; and that they had
held the opinion that things relating to thought flow in from without, that
is, through the external senses, according to the appearance; whereas the
heavenly society in which they were, held the opinion that they inflow from
within; and as they (the speakers) were in falsity, they fell down-not that
they were cast down, for the angels cast no one down from them, but being in
falsity they fell down of themselves; and they said that this was the cause.
[3] By this it was given to know that discourse in heaven concerning thoughts
and influx is represented by birds; and that of those who are in falsity by
dark and unsightly birds; but that of those who are in the truth, by birds
noble and beautiful. I was at the same time instructed that all things of
thought inflow from within, and not from without, although it appears so; and
I was told that it is contrary to order for the posterior to flow into the
prior, or the grosser into the purer; thus for the body to inflow into the
soul.
AC 3220.
3220. When the angels are discoursing about things of intelligence and wisdom,
and about perceptions and knowledges, the influx from them into the
corresponding societies of spirits falls into representations of such things
as are in the vegetable kingdom; as into representations of paradises, of
vine-yards, of forests, of meadows with flowers, and into many lovely forms
that surpass all human imagination. Hence it is that things which are of
wisdom and intelligence are described in the Word by paradises, vineyards,
forests, meadows; and that where these are mentioned, such things are
signified.
AC 3221.
3221. The discourses of the angels are sometimes represented by clouds, and by
their forms, colors, movements, and changes; things affirmative of truth by
bright and ascending clouds; things negative by dark and descending clouds;
things affirmative of falsity by dusky and black clouds; consent and dissent
by the various gatherings together and partings asunder of the clouds, and
these latter as in a sky like that of the heavens in the night.
AC 3222.
3222. Moreover loves and their affections are represented by flames, and this
with inexpressible variation; whereas truths are represented by lights, and by
innumerable modifications of light. This shows whence it is that by "flames"
in the Word are signified the goods which are of love; and by "lights" the
truths which are of faith.
AC 3226.
3226. Among the eminent faculties which man possesses, although he is ignorant
of it, and which he carries with him into the other life when he passes
thither after his liberation from the body, is that he perceives what is
signified by the representatives which appear in the other life; also that he
is able by the sense of his mind to express fully in a moment of time what he
could not express during hours in the body; and this by ideas from those
things which are of the light of heaven, assisted and given as it were wings
by suitable appearances representative of the subject of discourse, which are
such as cannot be described; and whereas man after death comes into these
faculties, and in the other life has no need to be instructed respecting them,
it is evident that he is in them (that is, that they are in him) during his
life in the body, although he does not know it.
[2] The reason of this is that there is a continual influx with man through
heaven from the Lord. This influx is an influx of spiritual and celestial
things, which fall into his natural things and are there presented
representatively. In heaven among the angels nothing else is thought of than
the celestial and spiritual things of the Lord's kingdom; but in the world,
with man, scarcely anything else is thought of than the corporeal and natural
things which belong to the kingdom in which he is, and to the necessaries of
life. And since the spiritual and celestial things of heaven which flow in are
presented representatively with man in his natural things, they therefore
remain implanted, and when a man puts off the body and leaves the world
behind, he is in them.
AC 3337.
3337. CONTINUATION CONCERNING CORRESPONDENCES AND REPRESENTATIONS.
What correspondences are, and what representations, may appear from what has
been said and shown above, namely, that there are correspondences between the
things which are of the light of heaven and those which are of the light of
the world; and that the things which take place in those which are of the
light of the world are representations (n. 3225). But what the light of heaven
is and what is its quality cannot be very well known to man, because he is in
the things that are of the light of the world; and insofar as he is in these,
the things that are in the light of heaven appear to him as darkness, and as
nothing. It is these two lights which-life flowing in-produce all the
intelligence of man.
The imagination of man consists solely of the forms and appearances of such
things as have been received by bodily vision wonderfully varied, and so to
speak modified; but his interior imagination, or thought, consists solely of
the forms and appearances of such things as have been drawn in through the
mind's vision still more wonderfully varied, and so to speak modified. The
things which come forth from this source are in themselves inanimate, but
become animate through the influx of life from the Lord.
AC 3338.
3338. Besides these lights there are also heats, which likewise are from two
fountains-the heat of heaven coming from its sun, which is the Lord; and the
heat of the world from its sun, which is the luminary visible to our eyes. The
heat of heaven manifests itself to the internal man under the form of
spiritual loves and affections; but the heat of the world manifests itself to
the external man under the form of natural loves and affections. The former
heat produces the life of the internal man, but the latter that of the
external man; for without love and affection man cannot live at all. Between
these two heats also there are correspondences. These heats become loves and
affections through the influx of the Lord's life; and hence they appear to man
as if they were not heats, although they are; for unless as to both the
internal and the external man, man derived heat from this source he would fall
down dead in a moment.
These facts must be evident to everybody from the circumstance that in
proportion as man is inflamed with love, he grows warm; and in proportion as
love recedes, he grows torpid. It is this heat from which the will of man
lives, and it is the light above spoken of from which comes his understanding.
AC 3339.
3339. In the other life these lights, and also these heats, appear to the
life. The angels live in the light of heaven, and also in the heat above
described; from the light they have intelligence, and from the heat they have
the affection of good. For in their origin the lights which appear before
their external sight are from the Lord's Divine wisdom; and the heats which
are also perceived by them are from His Divine love; and therefore the more
the spirits and angels are in the intelligence of truth and the affection of
good, the nearer they are to the Lord.
AC 3340.
3340. To this light there is an opposite darkness, and to this heat there is
an opposite cold; in these live the infernals. Their darkness is from the
falsities in which they are, and their cold is from the evils; and the more
remote they are from truths, the greater is their darkness; and the more
remote they are from good, the greater is their cold. When it is permitted to
look into the hells where such infernals are, there appears a dark cloud in
which they have their abode; and when any exhalation flows out thence, there
are perceived insanities that exhale from falsities, and hatreds that exhale
from evils.
A light is indeed sometimes granted them, but it is a deceptive one; and this
is extinguished with them, and becomes darkness, the moment they look at the
light of truth. Heat also is sometimes granted them, but it is like that of an
unclean bath; and this is changed into cold with them as soon as they observe
anything of good. A certain person was let into that dark cloud where the
infernals are, in order that he might know how the case is with those who are
there; he being protected by the Lord by means of angels. Speaking from thence
with me he said that there was there so great a rage of insanity against good
and truth, and especially against the Lord, that he was amazed that it could
possibly be resisted; for the infernals breathed nothing but hatred, revenge,
and slaughter, with such violence that they desired to destroy all in the
universe; so that unless this rage was continually repelled by the Lord, the
whole human race would perish.
AC 3341.
3341. Inasmuch as the representations in the other life cannot take place
except by means of differences of light and shade, be it known that all light,
consequently all intelligence and wisdom, are from the Lord; and that all
shade, consequently all insanity and folly, are from that which is their own
in man, spirit, and angel; from these two origins flow forth and are derived
all the variegations which are of light and shade in the other life.
AC 3342.
3342. All the speech of spirits and of angels is also effected by means of
representatives; for by wonderful variations of light and shade they vividly
present before the internal and at the same time before the external sight of
him with whom they speak, all they are thinking about, and insinuate it by
suitable changes of the state of the affections. The representations that come
forth in such speech are not like those before described, but are quick and
instantaneous, being simultaneous with the ideas that belong to their speech.
They are like something that is described in a long series, while at the same
time it is exhibited in an image before the eyes, for, wonderful to say, all
spiritual things themselves whatever can be representatively exhibited by
forms of imagery that are incomprehensible to man, within which are things of
the perception of truth, and still more interiorly those of the perception of
good. Such things are also in man (for man is a spirit clothed with a body);
as is evident from the fact that all speech perceived by the ear, on ascending
toward the interiors, passes into forms [ideas]* not unlike those of sight,
and from these into intellectual forms or ideas, and thus becomes a perception
of the sense of the expressions.
Whoever rightly reflects upon these things may know from them that there is in
himself a spirit which is his internal man, and also that after the separation
of the body he will possess such a speech, because he is in the very same
during his life in the world, although it does not appear to him that he is in
it, by reason of the obscurity and darkness which earthly, bodily, and worldly
things induce.
AC 3343.
3343. The speech of the angels of the interior heaven is still more
beautifully and pleasantly representative; but the ideas which are
representatively formed are not expressible by words, and if they should be
expressed by any, they would surpass not only apprehension, but also belief.
Spiritual things, which are of truth, are expressed by modifications of
heavenly light, in which are affections, which are wonderfully varied in
innumerable ways; and celestial things, which are of good, are expressed by
variations of heavenly flame or heat; so that they move all the affections.
Into this interior speech also man comes after the separation of the body, but
only the man who during his life in this world is in spiritual good, that is,
in the good of faith, or what is the same, in charity toward the neighbor; for
he has this speech within himself, though he is unaware of it.
AC 3344.
3344. But the speech of the angels of the still more interior or third heaven,
although also representative, is yet such as to be inconceivable by any idea,
and consequently is indescribable. Even this perfect form of speech [idea] is
also within man, but in the man who is in celestial love, that is, in love to
the Lord; and after the separation of the body he comes into it as if born
into it, although as before said nothing of it could be comprehended by him
under any idea during his life in the body. In short, by means of
representatives adjoined to ideas, speech becomes as it were alive; least of
all with man, because he is in the speech of words; but more so with the
angels of the first heaven; still more so with the angels of the second
heaven; and most of all with the angels of the third heaven, because these are
most nearly in the Lord's life. In itself whatever is from the Lord is alive.
AC 3345.
3345. From what has been said it is evident that there are kinds of speech
successively more interior, but yet of such a nature that the one comes forth
from the other in order, and also that the one is within the other in order.
The nature of man's speech is known, and also his thought from which the
speech flows, the analytics of which are of such a nature that they can never
be explored. The speech of good spirits, that is, of the angels of the first
heaven, together with the thought from which it flows, is more interior, and
contains within it things still more wonderful and unexplorable. The speech of
the angels of the second heaven together with the thought from which again
this flows, is still more interior, containing within it things still more
perfect and unutterable. But the speech of the angels of the third heaven
together with the thought from which again this flows, is inmost, containing
within it things absolutely unutterable. And although all these kinds of
speech are of such a nature that they appear different from one another,
nevertheless there is but one speech, because the one forms the other, and the
one is within the other; moreover that which comes forth in the exterior is
representative of the interior.
A man who does not think beyond worldly and bodily things cannot believe this,
and therefore supposes that the interior things with him are nothing, although
in fact they are everything; and the exterior things, that is, the worldly and
corporeal things that he makes everything, are relatively scarcely anything.
AC 3346.
3346. In order that I might know these things, and know them with certainty,
of the Lord's Divine mercy it has been granted me for several years to speak
almost constantly with spirits and angels; and with spirits (that is, with the
angels of the first heaven)* in their own speech; also at times with the
angels of the second heaven in their speech; but the speech of the angels of
the third heaven has only appeared to me as a radiation of light, in which
there was perception from the flame of good within it.
AC 3347.
3347. I have heard angels speaking concerning human minds, and concerning
their thought and the derivative speech. They compared them to the external
form of man, which comes forth and subsists from the innumerable forms that
are within-as from the brains, the medulla, the lungs, the heart, liver,
pancreas, spleen, stomach, and intestines, besides many other organs, as those
of generation in both sexes from the innumerable muscles encompassing these
organs; and lastly from the integuments; and from all these being woven
together from vessels and fibers, and indeed from vessels and fibers within
vessels and fibers, from which come the ducts and lesser forms; thus that the
body is composed of things innumerable; all of which nevertheless conspire,
each in its own way, to the composition of the external form, in which nothing
appears of the things that are within.
To this external form they compared human minds, and their thoughts and the
derivative speech. But angelic minds they compared to those things which are
within, which are relatively illimitable, and also incomprehensible. They also
compared the faculty of thinking to the faculty that belongs to the viscera of
acting according to the form of the fibers, saying that the faculty is not of
the fibers, but of the life in the fibers; just as the faculty of thinking is
not of the mind, but of life from the Lord flowing into it. When such
comparisons are made by angels they are at the same time exhibited by means of
representatives, whereby the interior forms above spoken of are presented
visibly and intellectually, in respect to their smallest incomprehensible
parts, and this in a moment; but comparisons made by means of spiritual and
celestial things, such as take place among the celestial angels, immeasurably
surpass in the beauty of wisdom those made by means of natural things.
AC 3474.
3474. A certain spirit came to me not long after he had departed this life.
This I was able to deduce from the fact that he still did not know that he had
entered the next life but supposed that he was living in the world. I
perceived that he had been a person dedicated to scholarly pursuits, about
which I spoke to him. But at that moment he was suddenly carried up on high,
which amazed me. I presumed that he was one of those people who had aspired to
high things, since such people are usually taken up on high; or else that he
was one of those who imagined heaven to be far away up on high and who
likewise are usually taken away up on high, so that from up there they may
know that heaven does not exist up on high but in what is internal. But
shortly after that I noticed that he was carried up to the angelic spirits who
were in a forward position and slightly to the right, on the very threshold of
heaven. From there he then spoke to me, saying that he saw things more exalted
than human minds could ever take in. While all this was happening I was
reading Deuteronomy 1, about the Jewish people - how the men were sent to
explore the land of Canaan and what was in it. As I read it he said that he
discerned nothing of that which occurs in the sense of the letter, only the
things in the spiritual sense, and that these were marvels beyond his powers
of description. This was merely at the threshold of the heaven of angelic
spirits, so what must the marvels be within that heaven itself, and what must
they be within the angelic heaven!
[2] Certain spirits who were with me at the time, and who had not previously
believed that the Word of the Lord was of such a nature, began to repent of
their unbelief. They said that in their present state they now believed
because they had heard that spirit say he had heard, seen, and perceived that
it was so. But other spirits continued in their unbelief, saying that it was
not so but all a delusion. They also were therefore suddenly carried up, and
spoke to me from where they were. They now confessed that it was anything but
a delusion, for now they perceived from amid spiritual realities that it was
so, their perception indeed being far keener than can possibly be imparted to
any of the senses during the life of the body. Shortly afterwards others also
were carried up into the same heaven. I had known one of them during his
lifetime, and he bore similar witness. Among other things he also said that he
was so dazed by the glory of the Word in its internal sense that he was unable
to describe it. Speaking at this time with some kind of compassion he said it
was remarkable that people on earth know nothing at all of such matters.
On two occasions after this I saw others who had been carried up to the second
heaven among the angelic spirits, and from there they spoke to me, while I was
reading Deuteronomy 3 from beginning to end. They said that they understood
none but the interior sense of the Word, declaring at the same time that there
was not even the smallest part of a letter which did not have a spiritual
sense within it that did not link with everything else in a very beautiful
way. They also said that in the interior sense the names used in the Word mean
real things. Thus these people as well were confirmed in the same knowledge of
such things, for they had not previously believed that every single thing in
the Word has been inspired by the Lord. This they also wished to affirm before
others on oath, but they were not allowed to do so.
AC 3476.
3476. From this one may now see what the situation is with the Word; for the
Lord has given the Word to mankind, and also to angels, so that by means of it
they may be with Him. Indeed the Word is the means by which earth is united to
heaven, and heaven to the Lord, its literal sense being that which unites
mankind to the first heaven. Now seeing that the literal sense holds within
itself the internal sense, the subject of which is the Lord's kingdom, and the
latter holds the highest sense, the subject of which is the Lord; and seeing
that these senses exist in order one within the next, it is evident what the
union with the Lord by means of the Word is like.
AC 3477.
3477. It has been stated that in heaven representatives are of constant
occurrence, such representatives in fact as embody wisdom's deepest arcana.
Those that are evident to man from the literal sense of the Word are
comparatively few, as few as the waters of a tiny pond when compared to the
waters of the ocean. What the representatives in heaven are like may become
clear from what I have related several times already from things I have seen,
and also from the following: To certain spirits, as I saw, there were
represented the broad road and the narrow road mentioned in the Word - the
broad road which would lead them to hell, and the narrow to heaven. The broad
road was planted with trees and flowers, and other such things as in outward
appearance looked beautiful and delightful. But various types of snakes and
serpents which they did not see had been concealed there. The narrow road was
not adorned in the same way with trees and flower-beds for the eye to see but
looked sad and dreary. Yet there were along that road young angel-children
adorned most attractively among very lovely tree-gardens and flower-gardens,
which those spirits however did not see. They were at that point asked which
road they wished to take. They said, The broad one. But all of a sudden their
eyes were opened and they saw the serpents along the broad road, but the
angels along the narrow one. They were then again asked which road they wished
to take. This time they were at a loss and remained silent. As long as their
sight was opened they said that they wished to take the narrow road; but as
long as it was closed they said that they wished to take the broad one.
AC 3478.
3478. To some there was also represented the tabernacle with the ark, for to
those who, when they lived in the world, have taken very great delight in the
Word such things are presented to them visually. So on the occasion referred
to they saw the tabernacle with all its furnishings; that is to say, they saw
its courts, its curtains round about, its veils inside, the golden altar or
altar of incense, the table where the loaves were placed, the lampstand, and
the mercy-seat with the cherubim. At the same time these upright spirits were
allowed to perceive what each particular thing meant. It was the three heavens
that were represented by the tabernacle, and the Lord Himself by the testimony
inside the ark, above which there was the mercy-seat. And to the extent their
sight was opened they saw within those objects more heavenly and Divine
things, of which they had had no knowledge at all during their lifetime. And
what was amazing, every least thing there, even every hook or ring, was
representative. Consider merely the bread placed on the table. Within this as
within a representative and symbol they perceived the food on which angels
live, and so perceived celestial and spiritual love together with all the
bliss and happiness that the angels enjoy. And within that love, also that
bliss and happiness, they perceived the Lord Himself as the bread or manna
from heaven. They perceived more besides from the shape, position, and number
of the loaves, and from the gold which was around them, and from the lampstand
which lit up those things and displayed further representations of things that
are indescribable. The same was so with everything else in the tabernacle.
From all this one might also see that the religious observances or the
representatives of the Jewish Church contained all the arcana of the Christian
Church, and also that those to whom the representatives and meaningful signs
of the Old Testament Word are disclosed are able, while living in the world,
to know and perceive the arcana which belong to the Lord's Church on earth.
And when they enter the next life they are able to know and perceive the
arcana of arcana which belong to the Lord's kingdom in heaven.
Note: The topic of correspondences in Sacred Scripture continues in
Section
1.8.8.1.
See also these references you can find in the Writings Sacred Scripture with
full details on correspondences:
D. Wis. 2. More about
Correspondence can be seen in the work HEAVEN AND HELL, Nos. 87-102, 103-115:
and about various correspondences in ARCANA CAELESTIA, namely, the
correspondence of the face and its expressions with the affections of the
mind, Nos. 1568, 2988-9, 3631, 4796-7, 4800, 5165, 5168, 5695, 9306: the
correspondence of the body in posture and action with intellectual and
voluntary things, Nos. 2988, 3632, 4215: the correspondence of the
Senses in general, Nos.
4318-30;
Eyes and sight, Nos. 4403-20;
Nose and smell, Nos. 4624-34;
Ears and hearing, Nos. 4652-60;
Tongue and taste, Nos.
4791-805;
Hands, arms, shoulders and
feet, Nos. 4931-53; Loins and organs of generation, Nos. 5050-62;
Viscera inside the body, in
particular the stomach, the thymus gland, and the receptacle and ducts of the
chyle, Nos. 5171-89;
Spleen, No. 9698;
Peritonaeum, kidneys and
bladder, Nos. 5377-96; Skin and bones, Nos. 5552-73;
Xiphoid (or ensiform)
cartilage, No. 9236;
Memory of abstract things, No.
6808;
Memory of material things, No.
7253:
the correspondence of heaven
with man, Nos. 911, 1900, 1928, 2996, 2998, 3634, 3636-43, 3741-5, 3884, 4041,
4279, 4523-4, 4625, 6013, 6057, 9279, 9632: the knowledge of correspondences
with the ancients was the chief of knowledges, specially with the orientals,
though it has at the present day become completely lost, Nos. 3021, 3419,
3472-85, 4280, 4749, 4844, 4964, 4966, 5702, 6004, 6692, 7097, 7729, 7779,
9391, 10252, 10407: without a knowledge of correspondences the Word is not
understood, NOS. 2890-3, 2987-3003, 3213-27, 3472-85, 8615, 10687: all things
seen in the heavens are correspondents, NOS. 1521, 1532, 1619-25, 1807-8,
1971, 1974, 1977, 1980-1, 2299, 2601, 3213-26, 3348, 3350, 3475, 3485, 3745,
9481, 9575-7: all things in the natural world and its three kingdoms
correspond to all things in the spiritual world, NOS. 1632, 1881, 2758,
2890-3, 2987-3003, 3213-27, 3483, 3624-49, 4044, 4053, 4116, 4366, 4939, 5116,
5377, 5428, 5477, 8211, 9280.
In addition to the above, the
ARCANA COELESTIA treats of the correspondence of the natural sense of the
Word, which is its literal sense, with spiritual things which are the things
of love and wisdom in the heavens from the Lord, these things constituting its
internal sense: this correspondence, moreover, you may see confirmed in THE
DOCTRINE OF THE NEW JERUSALEM CONCERNING THE SACRED SCRIPTURE, NOS. 5-26, and
further on in NOS. 27-69. To form an idea of the correspondence of the Will
and Understanding, what has been said above may be consulted, NOS. 366 and
367.***
(D. Wis. 2.)
1.1.4.3.3
Three Levels of Thinking About God: Energy, Person, Truth From Good
-
(I) "God as energy" -- is a
natural idea of God.
-
(II) "God as Divine Person"
-- is
a spiritual idea of God.
-
(III) "God as Truth within
which is
Good" is a celestial idea of God.
(I) God as energy is a
natural idea of God.
Some people say that the universe
is God. Some people think that God is nature and they point to a flower and say,
this is God, and they point to new born puppy and a flying eagle, and say this
is God. Others have said that the sun is God. Psychologists have said that God
is a concept or idea that people make up in order to have a Father figure
around. Some say that God created the universe but has left its running to
natural laws. Others have said that the elements are so many gods and spirits,
or Fate, or the Unknown, or the Mysterious, or the Devil, etc. etc.
These are all natural ideas
of God. Not rational or spiritual.
All natural
ideas are based on experiences people have with the physical environment.
From the physicalistic (non-rational) perspective, "God" is a logically impossible concept since God is
defined as a creator who exists outside time and space. The idea of something
outside time and space doesn't make sense at the natural level
of thinking. It is likely that as you are reading this, you too are thinking of
God with natural ideas. This can't be helped for we all start with an external
time-bound and space-bound idea of God in religion, which is based on the
literal sense of Sacred Scripture (see Section xx). Indeed, the literal sense of
Sacred Scripture is always expressed at the natural level of thinking and with
natural content from this world. Hardly anything is mentioned in the literal
sense of Sacred Scripture about the mental world of eternity in the afterlife.
So little is said about it, that the majority of people who call their Sacred
Scripture holy and Divine, believe that the afterlife is in this world and
starts after all the dead are raised to life again. Nothing at all is known
about eternity.
With the publication of the
Writings Sacred Scripture in the 18th century by Emanuel Swedenborg (see
Section xx), there has therefore taken place a most important shift in God's
management of the human race. All prior Sacred Scripture given to humankind has
withheld telling about and explaining rationally the mental life of eternity.
But now God has decided that "it is permitted" (Latin: Nunc Licet) to
rationally investigate God through theistic science: Quoting from the Writings
Sacred Scripture:
TCR 508. Afterward, when I
drew nearer, I saw this inscription above the door, Nunc Licet - It is
now permitted - which signified that it is now permitted to enter
understandingly into the mysteries of faith. From seeing this inscription it
came into my thought that it is exceedingly dangerous to enter with the
understanding into dogmas of faith that are concocted out of
self-intelligence, and therefore out of falsities, and still more so to
confirm them from the Word; by this means the understanding is closed above,
and gradually below as well, to such a degree that theology is not only
despised but also obliterated from the mind, as writing on paper is by worms,
or the wool of a garment by moths. Then the understanding abides only in
political matters, which have regard to man's life under the government where
he is, and in the civil matters pertaining to his employment, and in the
domestic affairs of his own house. And in all these things he constantly
kisses nature, and owing to the allurements of her pleasures, loves her as an
idolater loves the golden image in his bosom. (TCR 508)
"To enter understandingly
into the mysteries of faith" means to investigate God rationally and
scientifically. This was not possible before the Writings Sacred Scripture were
published. This collection of nearly thirty volumes is a holistic, rational, and
integrated explanation of God and the afterlife based on the correspondential
sense of Sacred Scripture. In other words it proves that Sacred Scripture is
written at two levels of meaning, one natural, the other correspondential. When
the correspondences are known, one can read the text of Sacred Scripture in
their correspondential sense, as we do in theistic psychology (see Section xx).
Further, Swedenborg was an empirical scientist all his life who, at age 57, was
given by God a unique ability of being conscious in both this world and the
world of the afterlife. At last the human race on earth had a direct scientific
window into eternity! Swedenborg's reports on life in eternity are empirical and
scientific confirmations of the existence of correspondences in Sacred Scripture
It turns out that the
correspondential sense of all Sacred Scripture, regardless of religion, is the
knowledge that we call theistic psychology (see Section xx).
In theistic psychology we
have a scientific method of investigating God and eternity.
We now have rational and
scientific answers to the "mysteries" of the ages such as:
How can God be everywhere at the same time
(omnipresence)? Unless God is space
itself, which is everywhere, or energy which is in everything. This is thinking
about God with natural concepts or ideas. There is no way of
breaking through this natural level of reasoning, based on only what is part
of time-space-matter. Even if we are practicing
members of a religion, the idea of God and eternity can only be comprehended
naturally, as for example, the idea many people have that the afterlife of
immortality is to take place on earth when we are supplied once more with a
physical body ("physical resurrection"). This is an example of the natural idea of God.
Along with this natural
level of thinking, is the belief that salvation, heaven, and hell depend on
specific prescribed membership rituals, declarations, or acts (see Section xx).
Hence people who fail to perform these rituals or declarations cannot be saved
from a life in hell. These natural ideas of God and the afterlife stem from
restricting oneself to the literal sense of Sacred Scripture (or teachings
and ideas based on the literal sense of it).
For instance, the literal sense of the Old
Testament Sacred Scripture is phrased to be read by people who have this natural
idea of God. The literal sense informs them that God is not natural because He is a
Spirit (but not explaining that Spirit = mind = eternity). What happens at this natural level
of thinking when we are told that God is the
Divine Being or Person. In order for us to accept or believe this idea it is necessary that Sacred
Scripture portray God as a stern, unforgiving but just Divine despot or king.
He can love human beings, but He can also hate them, retaliate and punish them
with plagues, famines, and being invaded and tortured by cruel enemies. All
these events are told in the Old Testament Sacred Scripture. Not a very likable portrayal of God. And yet, this is necessary, or else God
would not be believable and consequently would not be listened to. This is
the why the literal sense of all Sacred Scripture must be written with natural
content and reasoning.
All religions are
necessarily based on the literal sense of Sacred Scripture, and this sense has a
natural content and reasoning process. Natural = time-bound, space-bound,
place-bound. Hence all Sacred Scripture in its literal sense is always
historical -- that is, involving time, place, identity, culture, politics,
events, declarations, commandments, rituals, language.
From the literal sense of the
Old and New Testament Sacred Scripture we can recognize the mentality or
level of thinking and reasoning about God, in the pre-modern and pre-democratic
times, cultures, and philosophies, not only in the Holy Land, but in Asia Minor, Greece,
and the Far East, hence on the entire globe. Today we are still going through
this natural phase of understanding God, but we now possess the modern
scientific mentality that gives us the ability to go on to the next level of
thinking about God.
(II) God as Divine Person is
a spiritual idea of God.
About two thousand years ago
God entered both history and science (see Section xx). This is the event called the Incarnation.
It means God's embodiment in flesh. In other words, when God created the physical universe of
time, space, energy, and matter, He obviously had to be outside of it in
order to create it. Think about this for awhile. When we manufacture a
car, we obviously have to be apart and outside the car, in order to create it.
The engineer cannot be part of the car, but the car is a product or creation of
the engineering team. First God has to exist, then, from infinite substances
within Himself, God can create the world of eternity for our mental organs and
life, and the world of time-space-matter for our physical body. So God as He Is
in Himself has to exist outside the eternity He created, and outside the
material universe of time and space. But God as He is Outside of Himself, can
be both in created eternity and in created time (see Section xx).
What is outside time and space? We must have a word for it
in order to discuss it and study it. There is a word others have used for it,
and you know it too. It is the word eternity.
Eternity means outside time
and space.
You can see this in your own mental world, which is the mental world of the
human race, and which exists in eternity (not in time-space, see Section xx). There is no time
or space or matter in eternity. What
do you know that's like it? There is something with which you are very familiar
every day that is just like it -- it has no time, it has no space, it has no
matter. What is it?
It is your mental world of feelings, thoughts,
dreams, imaginings, perceptions, and
sensations! (see Section xx)
So you are a person because
you have feelings, thoughts, and sensations. And these are mental activities in
mental organs. They cannot exist in your brain because thoughts and feelings
have no mass, no weight, no space limitations, no dependence on energy, not
composed of atoms and molecules like the brain is. The mind is a mental organ
constructed of mental substances that exist outside time and space in eternity.
Your thoughts and feelings are real, but they are not natural. They are
spiritual or rational.
You need to understand that
we are dual citizens. When we are born we are born into two
worlds, one in time-space, the other in eternity. Our physical body is born in the physical world of time and space and
is temporary. Simultaneously, our mental body ("spiritual body") is born in the
mental world, which is outside time and space, and is eternal. So we live our
life "on earth" unconscious of the the fact that we are dual citizens. It
becomes immediately obvious though, if you start thinking about it. The world of
our thoughts and feelings is the real and actual me, rather than my liver,
heart, or brain. In the negative bias non-theistic psychology that is taught
today, the reality of the mental world is denied. Instead, the reductionistic
method is taught, which is that thoughts and feelings = electro-chemical firings
in the physical brain, and not mental or spiritual operations outside time and
space.
Now in theistic psychology it
is known that at the death of the physical body we
undergo the 30-hour process of resuscitation, and we regain consciousness in our spiritual body,
continuing our life of
immortality in the world of eternity where we exist since birth as dual citizens. This proves that to be a person means to have a spiritual body, not
just a physical body. Though we have a physical body at birth, it is only for awhile.
Some people live just a few minutes in their physical body, die as neonates or
infants, and then continue to finish becoming adult minds in their spiritual
body. Swedenborg confirmed this by observation of many children who had passed on while he was
conscious in both worlds simultaneously, from age 57 to 84 (see Section xx).
Quoting from the Writings
Sacred Scripture:
HH 345. What the difference
is between those who die in childhood and those who die in mature life will
also be told. Those dying in mature life have a plane acquired from the
earthly and material world, and this they carry with them. This plane is their
memory and its corporeal natural affection. This remains fixed and is then
quiescent, but still serves their thought after death as an outermost plane,
since thought inflows into it. Consequently such as this plane is, and such as
the correspondence is between the things that are in it and the rational
faculty, such is the man after death. But little children who die in childhood
and are educated in heaven do not have such a plane, but they have a
spiritual-natural plane, since they derive nothing from the material world and
the earthly body. For this reason, they cannot be in such gross affections and
consequent thoughts, since they derive all things from heaven. Moreover, these
little children do not know that they were born in the world, but believe that
they were born in heaven. Neither do they know about any other than a
spiritual birth effected through the cognitions of good and truth and through
the intelligence and wisdom, from which man is a man; and as these are from
the Lord they believe themselves to be the Lord's own, and love to be so.
Nevertheless, it is possible for the state of men who grow up on the earth to
become as perfect as the state of little children who grow up in heaven,
provided they put away bodily and earthly loves, which are the loves of self
and the world, and receive in their place spiritual loves. (HH 345)
To be a person means to have
feelings, thoughts, and sensations. Animals also have these mental or spiritual
experiences, but only at
the natural level. Animals have a natural mind like we do. This does not
yet mean that we are a human person. To be a human, which is to be a person, we must
have a spiritual or rational mind that is immortal. When we are born, our mind contains an
organic spiritual mind that is unconscious, and a natural mind that is conscious. Both
minds must grow
and mature together, though we are conscious of only one. Swedenborg was conscious in both,
from age 57 to 84. Upon the death of the physical body, our
consciousness switches from the natural mind to the spiritual mind. Our true
human mind is therefore the spiritual mind within the spiritual body. This is
immortal. Whereas animals are not immortal because their natural mind does not
have a spiritual mind above them in which they can live in eternity (see Section
xx).
Nevertheless, Swedenborg
reports that animals are plentiful in the world of the afterlife. But these
animals are created instantaneously by our thoughts and feelings, just like we
create our surroundings for social and city life (see Section xx. But while you
are no thinking of your pet or garden or house, these things disappear, only to
be recreated the instant you think about them (see Section xx).
Because only immortal human beings can
be called "persons", we are called "spirits" in Sacred Scripture, while animals
are not. For instance, we can say that we are
spirits looking out though a material body -- until death, and in the afterlife,
we are spirits in a mental body forever. The mental world cannot end or
disappear. It is eternity.
From all this you can see
what it means to say that God is a Person. It means that God as He is Outside of
Himself, is a Spirit or Divine Human Person in eternity, who has feelings, thoughts, and sensations. You have heard that we are
created in the "likeness and image of God." What makes us human is that God is
Human, that is, God is a Divine Human Person. Hence it is appropriate to call God
"the Divine
Human", as it is done in the literal sense of the Writings Sacred Scripture
(written out by Swedenborg in Latin).
To think of God as a Spirit
or Person, that is, to think of God as the Divine Human, requires a higher level
of rational thinking and reasoning than the natural level which thinks of God as
energy, the universe, or nature. For instance, when the Incarnate Divine Human
("God in flesh") arrived on the historical scene two thousand years ago
(see Section xx), people could see
God at the natural level of reality they could comprehend. God as He is
Outside of Himself, now was in His Natural Body. Until then God was only a
natural abstraction in their mind. They could not think
of God as a Person. They were even forbidden by their religion to think of
the infinite incomprehensible God as a human person, which was called
"anthropomorphizing God". They could not love an abstraction of God, so they were
given sacred power rituals that they took as physical proof of God's existence
and presence with their nation. They could not love God but they could love
God's physical rituals and sacred objects.
But when God entered history
and science with a natural body and a socio-legal citizenship (see Section xx), everyone who is
at the materialistic mentality of natural thinking can easily form an idea or
picture of God. In this way they can leave the first natural level and start a
new life, a new way of thinking that is entirely different and higher in
rationality. This level starts with the comprehension of the idea that God as a
Divine Human Person who always existed in eternity from where He created the
physical universe. And we can then understand our immortality as "souls", since
souls are
created into the world of eternity where God is, and only temporarily do we have our
consciousness trapped by a natural body.
Now for the very first time
in human consciousness and evolution, human beings can start loving God in a
different way. This new way in which we can reciprocate God's love for us, is
the final phase in the evolution of conjunction of God with the human race (see
Section xx). What makes possible this new way of loving God, is the Incarnation
Event, by which God acquired for Himself a Divine Natural Body along with a
Divine Natural Mind. This is therefore a new way in which God is present in the
mind of every human being. Through this new creation for Himself, God as He is
Outside of Himself has changed forever. In this new Divine Natural Body
and Mind, God can appear in the conscious awareness of the natural mind.
This is
a momentous development in the evolution of the human race because we can love
God more closely when we can understand Him rationally with our conscious
natural mind. Until two thousand years ago when God acquired a Divine Natural
Body and Mind, human beings in both worlds were incapable of picturing in their
conscious natural mind, the actual form of God. This was impossible because God
did not have a natural form that one can picture. We can picture angels because
they are in the human form. We cannot picture God as infinite love and wisdom
except in the human form. God already had the human form in His Love and Wisdom,
for these are human, that is, belonging to a person. We are in God's image, and
therefore we too have love and wisdom in the human form.
God's infinite love, good,
and power (omnipotence), are operations of His Affective Organ,
which is constructed out of the eternal substance of good or spiritual heat. In
this organ, infinite varieties of love, virtue, and power are gathered together
and functioning as one affective organ. This organ is in the human form. Hence
it is that our affective organ is in the human form. Hence also it is that the
heart with its circulatory system extending into every inch of the physical
body, is also in the human form.
God's infinite wisdom, truth,
and rationality (omniscience), are operations of His Cognitive Organ,
which is constructed out of the eternal substance of truth or spiritual light.
In this organ, infinite varieties of truths, knowledges, and understandings are
gathered together and functioning as one cognitive organ. This organ is in the
human form. Hence it is that our cognitive organ is in the human form. Hence
also it is that the lungs with its respiratory system extending in their effects
into every inch of the body, is also in the human form.
God's infinite presence,
participation, and availability (omnipresence), are operations of His
Natural Body, which is constructed out of the Glorified physical body,
not the original physical body prior to His death and resurrection (see Section
xx). In this new Glorified Body (made Divine), which God obtained on this earth
merely two thousand years ago, infinite varieties of uses, sciences, and arts
are gathered together and functioning as one Divine Natural Body and Mind. This
Divine Body is in the human form. Hence it is that our physical body is in the
human form. Hence also it is that the musculature, skeleton, and brain with its
nervous system extending into every inch of the body, are also shaped in the
human form.
The conjunction between God
and every human being can now be made perfect or complete. How close or perfect
a conjunction we have with God, now depends solely on each individual. The
closer our conjunction with God, the more God can give the person full potential
in eternal happiness, conjugial love, intelligence, ability. Now that God is
omnipresent in His Natural Body, we can see the Divine Human in our rational
understanding. Blind faith or one that is based on mystery and little
comprehension, cannot provide a clear and distinct picture of God in our natural
mind. Mystical belief in God is not as close a conjunction with God as
rational understanding of God (see Section xx).
What we do not understand
rationally, we cannot fully believe, and what we cannot fully believe, we cannot
fully love. Hence it was necessary for God to create this next step of our
evolution by acquiring for Himself a Divine Natural Body in which He can be
omnipresent in every person's mind -- should the person want to picture Him
for the sake of loving Him more.
Until we start loving God
fully from rational understanding, we are
not completely human. It is our rational love for God that makes us into a "likeness and
image" of God, hence fully human. The beginning of being genuinely human is
the rational mind. Below that is the sensuous mind that we share in common with
animals (see Section xx). This means that we can think and feel in our conscious
natural mind at the
level of spiritual rationality or truth. We cannot appropriate rationality as
our own trait until we love God from rationally understanding Him.
Rationality comes through the love we maintain for God as the Divine Human
Person who creates us and maintains us from birth to eternity. While we are in
the lower mentality of sensuous thinking of God we cannot love God with full
conjunction and we cannot
receive God's rationality as-if our own (see Section xx).
Hence the Incarnation event
(God's embodiment)
was the most momentous single event in human history and evolution. As a result
of that event every human mind contains rational heavens and irrational hells.
The Incarnation event separated the human mind into these levels which can never
again be mixed (see Section xx). Since they cannot be mixed, our life in
eternity is either all in one, or all in the other. When we love God as a Divine
Human Person who is omnipotent and infinite, then we can receive the rational
thoughts and feelings that allows us to live in the heavens.
(III) God as Truth within
which is
Good is a celestial idea of God.
Once we understand that God
is a Divine Human Person, we are thinking rationally. The level of meaning of
this rationality is called spiritual-natural and spiritual-rational correspondences of Divine Speech
(see Section xx). This is also called our first and second heaven. But there is a more
interior level of thinking and feeling, still higher, which is our third heaven,
at is is called celestial-rational correspondences of Divine Speech. At this
level of thinking we do not focus on the idea that God is a Person. We do not
deny it since every time we come back to the lower level of thinking and
feeling, we see this, we
understand that God is a Person, and we love Him as the universal God the Divine Human and as our
own Divine Psychologist. But when we ascend to the celestial-rational level of thinking about God, we put
the Person idea behind us, or below us, and we love God in a different way, a
higher way, a more universal way.
(1) God has revealed in the
Old
Testament Sacred Scripture that He is a Divine Person from eternity.
(2) God has confirmed in
the New Testament Sacred Scripture that He is a Divine Human Person
from eternity, and has revealed that he has acquired a Divine Natural Mind and
Body in time and space, which He Glorified or made Divine substantial,
expelling the inherited human corporeal through death and resurrection.
(3) God has confirmed in the
Writings Sacred Scripture that He is a Divine Human Person from eternity,
and has revealed that with His Divine Natural Mind and Glorified Natural Body
He is omnipresent, and that thereby He is present as the Divine Psychologist
in the conscious mind of every human being, providing all good and truth we
need, in proportion to our willingness to undergo regeneration of our
inherited character. And has also revealed the correspondential sense of all
Sacred Scripture, making it possible for us to extract scientific knowledge
from Divine Speech.
These three sets of
revelations in historical sequence over thousands of years have formed the
advance of civilization through the progressive development of rationality in
the human mind. These also mark the mental states of development that every
human being must go through in order to be prepared for eternal life in the
heavens of the human mind. If we know these details, we can make sure that we
manage the process appropriately, thus insuring for ourselves a heavenly life in
immortality. It is not our merit or power that allows us to be prepared for
heavenly life, since all power belongs to the omnipotent God. However, since
regeneration and heavenly life occur only through the process of personal
freedom of choice, God cannot force us into heaven. That would not be heaven,
but a hell. Hence the Divine Psychologist in our conscious daily natural mind
urges and encourages us to cooperate with Him.
The amount of good and truth
He can give us depends on the degree to which we are willing to cooperate. We
cooperate with God in our mind by engaging in combat as-of self, fighting our
hellish traits, urges, and enjoyments, actively rejecting them because they are
contrary to our heaven (see Section xx).
Our preparedness for heavenly
life in eternity depends on our willingness to regenerate our
inherited selfish or hellish character traits, as they are more animal than human. Acquiring
rationality depends on acquiring the willingness to cooperate with the truth
from love that enters our mind from God's mind through Divine Speech. It is the same whether we say truth from love, or
truth from good, because love = good (see Section xx).
What does it mean to love God
as Truth from Love?
We can no longer think that
God is going to punish us in this world (natural level of thinking) or in the
afterlife (spiritual level of thinking). God is truth from love, and this cannot
punish. We can no longer think that God is angry with us because we are in sin
(spiritual level of thinking). Or that God needs a sacrifice from us, or some
other way, to forgive us, or to be reconciled to us. These are outward
perspectives on God. But God is omnipotent and omnipresent. God is activating
the content and sequence of our thoughts, and the events around us. God is not
out there separated from us on account of this or that in our past, etc. At the
celestial level of thinking we understand that God has already forgiven us
before we even sin and that God is the one who managed the details of our sinful
conduct. God cannot be turned away from us, or go away from us, etc. These are
not rational ideas at the highest level of thinking.
Instead we can see that God
and the individual form a functioning team or unit, managing every single
particular detail of our thoughts, feelings, intentions, reasonings, etc. Once
we understand this, the final step is to understand where God's truth from love
is in us as part of the team we make as a person.
To love God at the
celestial level of thinking and feeling means to love good and truth as God.
In other words, when you love
good and truth you love God. This is totally different from loving God as a
Divine Human Person. They are not incompatible of course, but one is below the
other in thinking level of rationality.
For example consider the
commandment that we love our neighbor. Every religion that acknowledges God from
eternity as Person ("monotheism"), teaches God's commandment that we must love
others rather than ourselves, if we are to live in the heavens of eternity. In
the Old Testament mentality (natural thinking about God), to love the neighbor
means to love your own kind. This is a racist perspective. Next in the New
Testament mentality (spiritual thinking about God), to love the neighbor means
to love everyone regardless of their race, background, or character. Next, in
the mentality of the Writings of Swedenborg, to love the neighbor means to love
the good and the true in the neighbor. We must not love everything about our
neighbor. Only the good and true in any particular person. This is what we are
to love because this is God's truth and love and we must love God's truth and
love for this is what it means to love God.
Hence at the highest level of
thinking rationally we will calibrate and make distinctions in what we love. We
only want to love that which is good and true. Most people have both good and
bad in their will and in their enjoyments. Our children are born with both. Our
parents have both. But we must not love our children, our parents, or anyone,
unconditionally. For this would mean to love the good and the bad in a person.
This would be disastrous (see Section xx).
It is hard to understand at
the spiritual level of thinking (God is a Divine Human Person) why we must not
love a person unconditionally out of charity and love. But at the celestial
level of thinking (good and truth is God), you can see that religious
sectarianism is not rational. Anyone with whatever background can be prepared
for a life in heaven if they love good and truth, regardless of what they also
may think about God as a religion (see Section xx).
For other views on God that
are not part of theistic psychology, see:
http://www.doesgodexist.org/
For a popular treatment, see
Time magazine article on God vs. Science (2006):
http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1555132,00.html
1.2
Mystical vs. Rational Approaches to Theistic Psychology
It's important to understand clearly
the difference between mystical and rational spirituality since they have
significantly different consequences through the choices we make. The basis for distinguishing mystical vs.
rational spirituality is to examine how they each conceptualize our relationship
to God.
The mystical approach is based on
seeking sensuous consciousness of the Divine.
The sensuous consciousness of the Divine
is often referred to by adherents as "sensing oneness with God" and other
references to "the experience of God." This sensing and experiencing are
operations of the corporeal-sensuous portion of the mind, which is very close to
the natural order of the physical body, but far from the rational operations in
the rational portion of the mind. Direct experience of God is therefore a
"corporeal spirituality" or a sensuous spirituality grounded in non-rational
experience. It will therefore be a "materialistic spirituality" whose order of
operation will reflect physicalistic objects and laws, as discussed above. For
instance, God will be conceptualized as a "spirit" and spirit is something that
floats around or moves like the wind, or fills everything in its sphere like
sunlight, or a field of energy or power. Some people claim to sense this energy
field, or even to use it as "spiritual" power objects to heal a friend or kill
an enemy, or just o experience ecstasy and out of body experiences.
These are the outward social psychological
manifestations and culture of a mystical spirituality based in corporeal or
physicalistic experience.
In contrast to this, rational spirituality is based on a
rational consciousness of God as a Divine Human or Person.
The anatomy of
the human mind (see Section xx) reveals that the rational portion of the organic
mind lies above the corporeal-sensuous portion. Whatever meaningful and logical
explanations we have of the corporeal-sensuous world around us, is a meaning constructed
by the rational portion which is capable of more complex cognitive and affective
operations. The anatomical charts in Section xx show that the rational portion
of the human mind is exposed to two sources of stimuli. At its bottom
portion, the rational mind receives stimuli from the corporeal-sensuous
experiences of our physical body living in a natural universe. At its upper
portion, the rational mind receives stimuli from the spiritual-celestial
experiences of our spiritual body living in a spiritual universe. In other
words, we are born dual citizens, with the spiritual body in the spiritual world
and the physical body in the natural world.
Our two bodies are functionally connected
by the laws of correspondences (see Section xx). At the death of the physical
body our corporeal-sensuous experiences are no longer connected to the physical
world. Instead, our spiritual body (or "mental body") is then the basis of our corporeal-sensuous
experiences. We then begin an immortal life outside time and space in the
spiritual universe, which is a mental universe created by rational ether
emanating from the Spiritual Sun. The
details of these operations were directly observed by Swedenborg for 27 years
while he found himself with the unique and unprecedented capability of being
conscious simultaneously in both his bodies. He could then explore the
spiritual-mental universe with his spiritual body while taking notes with his
physical body and publishing them. These 30 volumes are called the Writings of
Swedenborg (published 1743-1771).
Since we now know the anatomy of the human organic mind we
see that there are two levels of rational thinking, a physical rational, or
materialistic rational level, and a spiritual rational level. The materialistic
level of rational operations are abstract metaphors or analogies constructed on
the basis of our corporeal-sensuous experiences -- touching,
measuring, smelling, weighing, counting, localizing in space and time,
contrasting, distinguishing, etc. The
most abstract of advanced theories in physics, economics, or biochemistry
are based on the physicalistic order imposed on or filtered through
the senses, in other words, based on corporeal-sensuous experiences. These are operations of the lower portion of the rational mind. All its ideas and
explanations will therefore be limited to the order of the physical sensory
world of matter, space, and time. Hence God will also be a physicalistic idea,
as for instance that God is infinite energy called Spirit, or that God is the
Divine above rationality that can be only sensed, not understood and described.
Or that God is a force that can be influenced by various methods --
incantations, sacrifices, obedience, anointment, rituals, etc. These are ideas
of materialistic spirituality constructed by the materialistic natural portion
of the mind. (See further in Section xx.)
Nevertheless its' important to realize
that materialistic-rational ideas vary in severity of denial of God and the
afterlife. Atheism, cultism, cynicism, spiritism, scientology, sorcery -- are
severe forms of denial because an elaborate intellectual system has been built
around the denial. Milder forms of denial of God include religious dogma, idol
worship, adoration of sacred objects or other human beings, superstition,
persuasive faith. These are less severe because there is "blind faith" involved
rather than intellectual justification. As a result they are able to receive
rational instruction after they are awakened in their resuscitation process. But
the former group are more resistant to rational instruction and tend to hang on
to their intellectual system no matter what is being shown them.
Those are most accepting of the new
spiritual instruction who have lived the life of good in their daily choices and
have not thought much about the dogmas of their religion. Thus they have not
rationalized and internalized the anti-rational ideas contained in their
mystical religion. Their altruistic and peaceful character allows
them to understand and accept with enthusiasm the new spiritual-rational truths
that are harmonious with the good in their character. But those who have made
daily choices of deception, selfishness, and lack of compassion, reject the new
spiritual instruction because it is not harmonious to their character. They
rather continue being the way they are than changing to fit the new spiritual
truths.
Rational consciousness of God never
depends on direct sensuous experience but only on the understanding of
scientific revelations contained in Sacred Scripture as Divine Speech.
This refers to spiritual truths or
meanings that continuously stream into every individual from the upper portion
of the rational mind. We are not directly conscious of these rational truths in
our spiritual mind but we can benefit from their presence there if we acquire
conscious rational ideas that correspond to them. When we study Sacred Scripture
as Divine Speech our rational mind is elevated to the celestial level of
enlightenment by means of the higher-order correspondences we acquire for
ourselves (see Section xx).
The rational mind receives stimuli from
the physical universe, in its lower portion, and receives stimuli from the
spiritual world in its upper portion. The rational mind is "bathed" in rational
ether like the physical senses are bathed in sunlight and atmospheres of air and
gravity. The atmosphere of rational ether that surrounds our spiritual body in
the spiritual world, is formed by the Spiritual Sun, which is a substantive
emanation of God's infinite Divine Love and Wisdom in the form of spiritual heat
and spiritual light (see Section xx).
While we are still connected to a physical body, our
conscious awareness is located in the operations of the materialistic mind. We
are therefore unconscious of the spiritual-rational ideas and operations
entering the upper portion of the rational mind. Nevertheless, we can become
conscious of them through learning the hierarchy of correspondences, to be
discussed throughout theistic psychology (e.g., see Section xx). This built-in
hierarchy of correspondences activates our consciousness, or conscious
understanding, allowing it to understand rationally the Divine revelations God
gives through a prophet or revelator at different times in the history of
civilization on this earth. What the prophet or revelator then writes down is called Sacred
Scripture. These contain all the hierarchy of correspondences by which we can
raise our consciousness to the celestial-rational level called "heaven." At that level of
rational spirituality we think of God in terms of higher order correspondences
nearest to true reality and what it affords human beings -- eternal life in
conjugial bliss that is ever growing and perfecting (see Section xx).
When our connection to the physical body is broken at
"death," we begin our life of immortality in rational ether by means of our
spiritual body which is the organic mind containing our feelings and thoughts,
and all their operations -- our self, our personality, our memories, our
identity, our ambitions and desires, etc. None of these mental operations are
located in the
physical body or brain. All along they existed in the mind or mental body. Nothing is therefore
lost as we lose the physical body except our ability to receive stimuli from the
natural world.
This new life of immortality in rational ether is completely
different from the life we experienced on earth in the physical universe.
Swedenborg was able to describe it in detail as he lived in it for 27 years
while he was also still doing his daily duties on earth -- being an engineer,
publisher, and member of the Swedish parliament. It took him a little while, as
you can imagine, to adjust to this sudden new duality of consciousness in which
he had to live from age 57 to 84. Until then he was a noted scientist and public
figure, but shortly after he began his dual life he resigned from his main job and
managed to write 30 volumes of notes that he published himself at his own
expense and then sent all the copies free to scholars and bishops all over
Christian Europe. Swedenborg's reports were unanimously rejected or ignored by
the clergy and science. Nevertheless, every generation since then has had a
small number of dedicated Swedenborg adherents who translated his many volumes
into various languages, and this process is going on today (see
Readings).
While we are still living on this earth, we cannot confirm what Swedenborg saw and heard by our own
direct sensuous consciousness of the spiritual world. Swedenborg was a unique
case. God prepared his mind from birth in order to be capable of living a dual
consciousness life, and this not until he was mature at age 57. The reason we
are not given direct sensuous and conscious awareness of the spiritual world is
that such an experience would inhibit the normal development of our rational
mind, which would endanger or corrupt the quality of life in our immortality.
When we awaken at death in our spiritual body -- a process Swedenborg observed
carefully with thousands of people -- we are no longer able to be divided in our
lower and upper portions of the mind. While we are conscious in this world the
two portions function separately, one conscious the other unconscious. A similar
independence is replicated with our external behavior and our internal feelings
and intentions. We can appear friendly and orderly on the outside, meanwhile we
can be plotting in our mind to do the opposite. This kind of "divided mind" is
no longer possible in the afterlife of immortality.
Hence we now begin to act on the outside exactly as we feel
on the inside. Swedenborg observed for years the visible environment in the
spiritual-mental world where everyone awakens after death. Remarkably, the
visual environment is created by each person's thoughts and feelings. We are
familiar with this idea when we consider our dreams. The visual and other
sensory environment while we dream feels very real, even more intensely real
than the environment we wake up to. The physical environment is fixed and
stable, unaffected by our feelings and thoughts. But our dream environment is
changeable and reflects our thoughts and desires. This is because dreams are in
the spiritual body which lives in a mental-spiritual atmosphere that is reactive
to the mental operations of every person.
Swedenborg describes some people who arrive with obsessive
fantasies and don't have the rational operations by which to overrule these
irrational thoughts and desires. As a result their feelings and thoughts create
a spiritual environment around them called "hell" in which they interact with
others who are in similar delusions. Swedenborg confirmed by multiple
observations and experiments in the spiritual world that people who have a
poorly developed rational mind sink their consciousness into their
corporeal-sensuous experiences that they had acquired from life on earth.
They live out their immortality in dire conditions and despite many
efforts at re-education, they are unwilling to change (see Section xx).
You can see why no one is allowed to have
direct sensuous experience of the spiritual world. It is a physiological
function that is normally blocked by God to protect the individual. If we can
have no physical proof of God's existence, or of the mental-spiritual
world of our afterlife, then we are able to develop a rational consciousness or
understanding of God and our life of immortality in rational ether.
The more rational power we have, the
higher we can raise our consciousness of God, and the more perfect will be our
afterlife in immortality. "Heaven" refers to this level of rational life in
which we act like angels or celestial humans -- we love obedience to God, we
make choices on the basis of His rational definitions of reality and truth, and
we love others as much or more than ourselves. "Hell" refers to the level of
corporeal-sensuous life, which is below the true human life. This lower life
tends to veer downward since it acts independently of the higher rational mind,
and falls prey to its own fantasies, irrationalities, obsessions, and hatreds.
The central purpose of our life on earth is therefore the
growth and development of spiritual-rational ideas and thoughts of God and
ourselves. Through this rational spirituality we can spend our immortality in
"heaven." Without it, we spend it in "hell." Nothing therefore can be as
important to us right now as to realize this difference and its consequences to
us.
For every generation of people on earth God provides a
powerful and effective method for growing our spiritual-rational mind. At
different times God inspires the mind of selected individuals to have a vision
or hear a message of Divine Speech. When this is written down it is called
Sacred Scripture. The prophet or writer only understands the literal meaning of
what he writes down, if that much. But hidden in this simple minded literal
meaning is the hierarchy of correspondences that is like an elevator shaft, or
staircase, by which our consciousness can travel upward higher and higher. The
secret of how to extract these higher-order cognitions was not known by anyone
until the method of correspondence was revealed in the Writings of Swedenborg
(see Section xx). The knowledge we gain from this lawful extraction process is
called theistic psychology.
The words and sentences of Sacred
Scripture reveal Divine truths of reality, but at various levels of rationality.
The lowest or most external level is the literal meaning of Sacred Scripture.
This tends to be historical, cultural, religious, mystical, visionary, and poetic in style. These are the
natural correspondences of Divine meanings. But anyone can think more deeply
about the sentences of Sacred Scripture. This attempt remained limited and
people came up with all sorts of contradictory explanations and interpretations
of the spiritual meaning that lies hidden in Sacred Scripture (see Section xx).
The Writings of Swedenborg now provide a full revelation and explanation of how
to extract correspondences from Sacred Scripture. Theistic psychology is based
on this knowledge.
Sensuous and mystical spirituality is a
way of avoiding the rational application of correspondences as revealed in the
Writings of Swedenborg. And yet our fate in eternity depends on the growth of
our spiritual-rational mind. We develop this mind more and more by analyzing and
understanding the correspondences hidden in the literal sentences of Sacred
Scripture. We develop our rational understanding by problem solving with those
sentences and ideas, and creating a "doctrine for life" out of them, which means
making up rational rules and principles by which we conduct our daily affairs
and relationships.
Our task is to live our daily life
according to this doctrine of life from Sacred Scripture. It is what determines
the content of our mind, what we take with us from this temporary life to the
afterlife of immortality. Swedenborg has observed over and over again that
people are unwilling to become more rational once they are in the afterlife. We
therefore "get stuck" at the level of rationality we bring with us. Whatever
rationality we bring with us gets then developed and perfected endlessly to
eternity. And since people bring different qualities of rationality with them
they congregate together with others of similar rationality, some higher, some
much higher, and some much much higher (see Section xx). Swedenborg visited
three levels of "heavenly" life and they were quite different. Similarly, he
visited many layers of "hellish" life, some much worse than others (see Section
xx).
It is the rational operation of the mind that is essential for
understanding God through God's revelation of truth in Sacred Scripture as
Divine Speech--according to
the approach of rational spirituality. But in mystical spirituality,
understanding of God is seen as limited while experiencing God is seen as more
immediate and powerful. However, according to rational spirituality the attempt to
"experience" or "sense" God directly is a delusion of corporeal spirituality. It
stems from self-intelligence and makes self-intelligence or the self, equal to
the Divine. This is known as "nonduality" because it assumes that God and human
beings can form a one as if their consciousness were of the same substance or
level. But
rational spirituality creates an absolute "duality" between God and human beings
since God is infinite and there cannot be a "oneness" between the infinite and
the finite. Nothing from the infinite (i.e., the Divine) can be an integral part of the
finite (i.e., human beings). I discuss the issue of nonduality at length in
Volume 1 of A man of the Field available on the Web:
www.soc.hawaii.edu/leonj/volume1-nonduality.html
According to rational spirituality we can
be "conjoined" with God, or "adjoined to Him, in a reciprocal duality or
relationship, where the parts always and forever remain distinct from each
other, and there is never a "melding" or other "oneness" possible.
Our immortality is a result of our
conjunction with God.
This is sometimes called "salvation," that
is, not having to die like other natural things. It allows our consciousness and
life to ascend to the highest human potential called "heaven," and in that state
of mind we enjoy eternal life in the heaven of our mind. But the delusion of
"oneness" with God brings falsities in one's life instead of truth, and the
eventual result is the corruption of the rational mind so that the self sinks
into the lowest state of human life called hell. Obviously it's crucial to be
able to distinguish between these two forms of spirituality, for one leads to
eternal happiness and rationality, while the other leads to eternal corruption
and delusion. Of course, those who follow the mystical approach reject the
premises of rational spirituality as ludicrous and they see no merit in it.
Therefore people must decide carefully for themselves by examining the rationale
of these two approaches to God and angelic life.
One may wonder why God doesn't show
Himself sensuously so people can have direct sensuous experience of God --
seeing Him, touching Him, having a chat with Him. Then God would be just like
any other real part of our lives, like our uncle, our neighbor, or the
president. The answer to this puzzle is explained rationally and scientifically
in the Writings of Swedenborg. Theistic psychology now understands that all
human minds are born and exist as organic structures in the spiritual world, not
in the natural physical world. The mind is functionally tied to the physical
body as long as its temporary existence still holds. But once the physical body
becomes a corpse, the connection is broken and we seem to ourselves to awaken in
the spiritual world. There we continue a life of immortality. It is the mind (or
"spirit") --
not the physical brain -- that actually senses, thinks and feels, while the
neurons in the brain parallel or
react by correspondence to the mind's operations. We need the physical brain
while we are connected to earth, but once the connection is broken, our new
sensory input is from the spiritual world through our mental body (or "rational
ether body").
Swedenborg had the unique opportunity in the
history of humankind to receive the ability of being conscious simultaneously in
the natural world and in the spiritual world, and this continuously without
interruption for 27 years. His physical body gave out at age 84 in 1772 and he
was no longer conscious of this world. But he left behind some 30 books about what he found out in the spiritual world. He was an experienced
and respected scientist and was able to write these books in a scientific
language and rational outline. Theistic psychology is the knowledge we have by
studying the Writings of Swedenborg.
We now know that the mind is a spiritual
organ that looks like the physical body in shape and form. The mind is not just
in the brain, as passed writers have thought. The mind is in the entire body and
the physical body has this shape because it parallels the mind in form.
The fibers and neurons of the mind's organs must grow in a proper
manner, and if they don't, they are corrupted or impaired. Mental development
must be adequate to support the proper growth of the rational mind. Negative and harmful
experiences people have in childhood introduce malfunctioning in the mental
organs. We also inherit many dysfunctional operations of the mind so that people have a
strong tendency to be irrational, selfish, violent, or disrespectful of authority. The
mind is therefore a battle ground between healthy and unhealthy tendencies. When
our connection with the physical world is terminated, the mind then lives an
immortal life in the spiritual world. The quality of that life depends on the
state or quality of the functioning mind -- its content and habitual operations. Negative thoughts and antisocial traits cause our conscious
awareness to sink into the lowest portion of the mind called "hell." We then
live in that state forever in dire conditions of insanity and obsession,
being unwilling to do what it takes to raise ourselves from that terrible
state. Positive affectivity and rational thoughts cause our conscious awareness
to be elevated into the highest portion of the human mind called "heaven." We
then live in that state of mind to eternity in conjugial joy, rationality, and wisdom.
Obviously an omnipotent God must supervise
and manage these operations for every individual, from birth to endless immortality. God
remains out of people's direct sensuous confirmation or physical proof of Him or
His existence. He does this in order that we may develop a strong
rational consciousness of Him. We get closer and closer in our conjunction with
God as we acquire more and more rational ideas and knowledge of Him through
Sacred Scripture as Divine Speech. The more we
allow God to take us closer in conjunction with Him, the more we can enjoy
rationality and bliss forever in our immortality. Closeness of conjunction with
God is through rational consciousness of Him, not sensuous. This is
why God will not appear to people directly to our external organs or mystical
experience.
It's an issue of psycho-biology. The
anatomy of the mind is such that its highest portion is pure rationality. The
more we have spiritual-rational concepts of God, the closer He can conjoin us to Himself,
and the more we are eternally wise, happy, altruistic, and good. It is this
spiritual rationality that forms the content of theistic psychology. The
rational ideas from the Writings are expressed in terms of the modern science of
psychology. Many people in the past two hundred years have contributed to this knowledge by studying and
researching the Writings of Swedenborg (see
Readings).
Since God avoids speaking to people
directly or communicating mystically "one on one," He uses another method of
communication called Sacred Scripture as Divine Speech. These are written in
hidden rational correspondences that reveal all the ways in which people can be
conjoined to God. For its content and facts, theistic psychology relies on the
lawful process of extracting hidden
correspondences from Sacred Scripture as Divine
Speech. This is how we obtain facts about God, what we must do to be conjoined with Him,
and how we must prepare adequately for life in immortality and eternity. All
personal, subjective speculation or fabrication about these topics can thus be
totally avoided.
All knowledge and facts of spiritual rationality are based
exclusively on this revealed source. However, as will be explained later in
detail, we
must rely on the underlying or hidden meanings of Sacred Scripture as Divine Speech. If we
rely on the surface literal meaning, we obtain mostly historical facts about a
place and people, and religious
injunctions for a particular cultural and racial group. These are not suitable for a science of theistic psychology. But the
"method of correspondences" revealed in the Writings of Swedenborg allow us to
systematically extract rational scientific knowledge and facts about God and our
immortality. Details on this method will be presented throughout the following
chapters.
1.2.1 Who was Swedenborg?
As a background to who was Swedenborg, I quote from
an article that gives a brief but authoritative biography of Swedenborg by
Dr. Jane K.
Williams-Hogan. The Web address of the article is
www.glencairnmuseum.org/jkwh.html (see also the
Reading List). Here are some
relevant quotes:
In his study he
[Swedenborg] gradually realized that
the Word alone could form the experiential ground of a new revelation from
God to man. Because this ground is universally available to all people and
unlike a private vision, it can be challenged or confirmed by other men's
rational and experiential response to it. (...)
As he grew to
understand it, that commission required both intellectual and spiritual
preparation. The need for such preparation, according to Swedenborg's own
testimony, lay in the nature of the revelation he was to receive. As he
stated in Arcana Coelestia, internal revelation, or revelation from
perception, requires preparation of the mind and soul, in order to create a
foundation for it. External revelations through dreams, visions or hearing a
voice, on the other hand, such as those received by the Jewish prophets, do
not require a similar foundation. Revelations of this kind are revelations
without perception or understanding. (...)
Because Swedenborg was
an instrument of an internal revelation, his spiritual mission took place in
both the spiritual and natural worlds. He believed that his commission to
the natural world entailed only that he should faithfully write, publish,
and disseminate the heavenly truths that were revealed to him by the
Divine-Human.
This is all that he did during the twenty-three years of his public mission.
He never put any effort into direct proselytizing or into organizing a new
church, nor did he personally attempt to convert anyone to his views.
Throughout this time he underwrote all of the expense necessary to fulfill
this mission, and whatever income he received from the sale of these books
he directed his printer to reinvest in their publication. He sold his books
below cost and he also sent many copies of his works to libraries, prelates,
and various other notable individuals. During this time from 1749 to 1771 he
published eighteen separate theological works. (...)
Swedenborg's religious
teachings provide a new vision of God, new insight into the nature of the
relationship between the spiritual and natural worlds, and a universal and
rational ethic to guide men to a useful life. It is a radical and rational
Christian religion: radical because it breaks with both Catholic and
Protestant traditional interpretations of the Trinity, original sin, the
atonement, and imputation and justification; and rational because the focus
of its theology is the penetration and clarification of the mysteries of
faith, through which a new understanding of salvation emerges which grants
man cooperative efficacy in spiritual things. (...)
According to
Swedenborg, the purpose of spiritual and natural creation was to form a
heaven from the human race. However, this required free response on the part
of man, and provision for his salvation. The spiritual world, of which
heaven is a part, is the world of causes, while the natural world is that of
effects. Therefore, for a new revelation to be truly new and universal, it
must reveal the world of causes which was for so long hidden from man, and
it must essentially address the question of order at that level; for so far
as the world of causes is ordered, so will be the world of effects.
See also
this brief biography of Swedenborg and his place in the world
today:
Williams-Hogan, Jane K. (2006). From Swedenborg to the New Church:
Interview. Religioscope. Available at:
http://religion.info/english/interviews/article_247.shtml
Here is a brief description of Swedenborg's works
compiled by
Dr. Ian Thompson
|
Primary Theological Works |
|
Arcana Coelestia (sometimes translated as
Heavenly Secrets) |
1747-1756 |
An extensive verse by verse explanation of the
deeper levels of meaning of Genesis and Exodus describing the
spiritual development of a human being and the nature of the
Divine. (Published in 12 volumes.) |
|
Spiritual Diary (sometimes called Spiritual
Experiences) |
1747-1763 |
The personal notebooks kept by Swedenborg of
his experiences in the Spiritual World and reflections upon them.
They were unpublished until the mid 1800s. |
|
Heaven and Hell |
1758 |
A description of the structure and phenomena of
the Spiritual World. |
|
Earths in the Universe |
1758 |
Conversations Swedenborg had with people in the
Spiritual World who said they were from other planets in the
universe. |
|
The Last Judgement |
1758 |
Description of events in the Spiritual World
preparing the way for the establishment of the New Church.
|
|
The White Horse |
1758 |
A brief explanation of the meaning of the white
horse with its rider from the Book of Revelation chapter 19 as the
Divine truth of the Lord's Word. |
|
The New Jerusalem and Its Heavenly Doctrine
|
1758 |
A brief summary of the fundamental doctrines of
the New Church with extensive references to the Arcana Coelestia
for further reading. |
|
The Doctrine of the Lord |
1763 |
A brief work summarizing the teachings about
God - His Divinity and Humanity - with extensive references to the
Old and New Testaments. |
|
The Doctrine of the Sacred Scripture
|
1763 |
A brief work summarizing the teachings on the
nature of revelation. |
|
The Doctrine of Life |
1763 |
A brief work describing the qualities which
comprise a life of good which leads to heaven. |
|
The Doctrine of Faith |
1763 |
A brief work explaining the nature of faith and
its role in the life of regeneration. |
|
A Continuation Concerning the Last Judgement
|
1763 |
A continuation describing various erroneous
beliefs about the Divine and the path of spiritual development.
|
|
Divine Love and Wisdom |
1763 |
A philosophic treatment of creation - how the
Divine finited Himself to produce the natural world and the human
race. |
|
Divine Providence |
1764 |
A thorough explanation of how the Lord leads
people in freedom to become angels in heaven; also, why He allows
evils to occur. |
|
Apocalypse Revealed |
1766 |
A two volume, verse by verse treatment of the
Book of Revelation. |
|
Conjugial Love (or Marital Love)
|
1768 |
An explanation of the sources of love in
marriage and a practical guide on how husbands and wives can grow
ever closer forming an eternal union. |
|
A Brief Exposition of the Doctrine of the
New Church |
1769 |
A point by point comparison of fundamental
Catholic and Protestant doctrines with the teachings of the New
Church. |
|
Inter-relationship of the Soul and Body
|
1769 |
A brief description of the relationship and
interaction between the spiritual and natural realms. |
|
True Christian Religion |
1771 |
A comprehensive overview of the fundamental
doctrines of the New Church, including the Lord, the Ten
Commandments, Faith, Charity, Repentance, Reformation,
Regeneration, Holy Supper, Baptism, and the Second Coming.
|
|
Primary Scientific
and Philosophical Works |
|
Principles of Chemistry |
1720 |
Swedenborg's first effort at explaining
creation. |
|
Miscellaneous Observations |
1722 |
A second attempt at explaining creation.
|
|
The Principia |
1734 |
Swedenborg's full explanation of creation,
including an introduction on the means leading to a true
philosophy. |
|
The Infinite and Final Cause of Creation |
1734 |
A philosophical argument for the existence of
God based upon the order in nature. |
|
The Economy of the Animate Kingdom |
1740-1741 |
An anatomical work looking at the blood,
embryology, etc., seeking an answer as to how the soul operates in
the body. This is Swedenborg's first clear articulation of the
doctrines of discrete degrees and correspondences. |
|
The Fiber |
1741 |
Contains Swedenborg's doctrine of physical
forms. |
|
The Rational Psychology |
1743 |
An exploration of the workings of the mind as a
"mixed intellect" between the soul and the "animus." |
|
The Animal Kingdom |
1744-1745 |
A second effort at explaining how the soul
operates in the body. Includes material on the five senses and
generation. |
|
The Worship and Love of God |
1745 |
An allegorical depiction of creation by God. |
|
Swedenborg and his career is discussed throughout the book and you
will gain additional insight on who he was as you proceed. You can also
consult the Readings
for biographies of him.
Swedenborg's Writings were
recently selected by the United Nations to be part of the Memory of the World
Register, a collection of important books from the past that must be saved for
posterity. Here is an explanation:
CENTER FOR HISTORY OF SCIENCE
The Swedenborg Collection – A World Memory
The Emanuel Swedenborg Collection,
one of the largest collections of manuscripts from an individual of the 18th
century, is managed by the Center for History of Science.
In June 2005, the
collection was
inscribed on UNESCO:s Memory of the World Register.
Read
UNESCO:s press release >>
The Collection consists of
manuscripts, original editions and letters by Swedenborg (1688–1772). The
collection contains documents from his years as a scientist and technician as
well as from the later part of his life, when he became a prophet and a
religious writer.

Some of the documents from
the Swedenborg collection.
© Royal Swedish Academy of
Sciences
Read about the purpose of
the Memory of the World Programme on their
web-site >>
Documentary heritage
reflects the diversity of languages, peoples and cultures. It is the mirror
of the world and its memory. But this memory is fragile. Every day,
irreplaceable parts of this memory disappear forever.
UNESCO has launched the Memory of the World Programme to guard against
collective amnesia calling upon the preservation of the valuable archive
holdings and library collections all over the world ensuring their wide
dissemination.
Emanuel Swedenborg as
prophet, holding a book about future apocalypses.
© Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences
Scientist and prophet
Emanuel Swedenborg was a very productive writer. After his death in 1772 his
manuscripts were donated to the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences by his
relatives. Swedenborg had himself been a member of the academy.
Swedenborg is one of the most
famous Swedes in the world and the only one whose work inspired the founding
of a new church. After a successful career as a scientist and technician he
went through a religious crisis in the 1740´s. This crisis culminated in a
revelation in which he was given the mission to tell mankind of the Bible´s
inner meaning and also reveal what the angels and other spirits told him. This
divine mission resulted in many books about the deeper truths in the Bible
which were written during the last 25 years of his life.
Swedenborg´s spiritual
message reached all over the world and still many of his followers read his
texts with deep reverence. His manuscripts are regarded as holy relics for
some of them. As early as the 1870´s many of Swedenborg's religious texts were
reproduced with a new innovative photolithographic technique. This technically
pioneering project was conducted by American and British followers of
Swedenborg.
From:
http://www.center.kva.se/engelska/swedenborg_collection.htm
|
Swedenborg Chronology
From
The Essential Swedenborg
by Sig Synnestvedt
newearth.org/frontier/esmain.html
|
1688 |
Born in Stockholm, Sweden, on January 29. |
|
1699 - 1709 |
Attended Uppsala University. |
|
1710 - 1715 |
First journey abroad, to England and the Continent. |
|
1716 |
First publications by Swedenborg in the magazine Daedalus. |
|
1716 |
Appointed Assesssor in the Royal College of Mines. |
|
1718 |
Ennoblement of Swedberg family with name changed to
Swedenborg. Assumption by Swedenborg of seat in House of
Nobles of Swedish Diet. |
|
1720 |
Publication of Swedenborg’s first book, a philosophic work
titled Principles of Chemistry. |
|
1729 - 1734 |
Writing and publication of his most important philosophical
works in three volumes, titled Philosophical and Mineralogical
Works. |
|
1735 - 1744 |
Period of intensive study, writing, and publication on the
nature of human existence, particularly as regards the concept
of the soul. |
|
1743 - 1744 |
First transcendent experiences, visions or dreams, in Holland
and England. |
|
1745 |
"Call" to become a revelator, London, England. |
|
1747 |
Resignation from the Swedish Board of Mines to allow time for
theological writing. |
|
1747 - 1758 |
Writing and publication of the twelve-volume Arcana Coelestia,
- Swedenborg’s first major theological work. |
|
1759 - 1761 |
Incidents of the Stockholm fire, the Dutch ambassador’s
receipt, and the Queen’s secret illustrating Swedenborg’s
clairvoyance. |
|
1768 - 1771 |
Heresy trial at Gothenburg, Sweden, involving state church
accusations against Swedenborg’s theology. |
|
1771 - 1772 |
Publication of the two-volume True Christian Religion in
Amsterdam, Holland, his last major theological work. |
|
1772 |
Death in London, England, at age 84, on March 29. |
|
|
Here is another compilation (selections only) covering Swedenborg's
earlier works on science: |
from:
The Works of Emanuel Swedenborg in Chronological Order
1714
Published Works
-
Joyous Accolade for Charles
XII’s … Arrival in His Own Pomerania.
-
Heliconian Pastime, or
Miscellaneous Poems that Emanuel Swedberg Composed for
Various Occasions.
Documents Not Published
-
Possible Draft of a Design of a
Submarine Ship
-
Possible Draft of a Design of a
Siphon
-
Possible Draft of a Design of a
Hoist for Heavy Objects
-
Possible Draft of a Document
About Constructing Sluices
-
Possible Draft of a Design of a
Big Machine for Pumping Water
-
Possible Draft of a Design of a
Drawbridge
-
Possible Draft of a Design of an
Air Pump
-
Possible Draft of a Design of an
Air Gun
-
Possible Draft of a Design of a
Universal Musical Instrument
-
Possible Draft of a Design for
Creating Shaded Images Using Engraving
-
Possible Draft of a Design of a
Water Clock
-
Possible Draft of a Mechanical
Carriage and a Flying Carriage
-
Possible Draft of a Method for
Analyzing Feelings or Inclinations
-
Possible Draft of a Design of
Cords and Springs
1716
Published Works
-
Either the Ages are Returning …
(First Epigram for “Daedalus Hyperboreus” - Sweden’s First
Scientific Journal (1716-1718))
-
Assessor Polhem’s Instrument to
Aid Hearing
-
Another Similar Instrument
-
On the Little Ear-Trumpet Used
in England
-
Assessor Polhem’s Experiments on
the Quality of Sound
-
Experiments That Yet Remain to
Be Conducted in Our Country Sound
-
On a Speaking-Tube
-
First Lifting and Reversing
Machine
-
Second Lifting Device
-
Experiments That Can Be
Conducted in Winter
-
Table for Converting Carolins to
Copper Dalers, Silver Dalers, and Riksdalers
-
Another Handy Method for
Converting Carolins … into Any Type of Currency …
-
Second Edition of Heleconian
Pastimes
-
Assessor Polhem’s Division of a
Steelyard
-
On an Air Pump …
-
Calculation and Measurement of
the Width and Height of Water and Air in Such Pumps
-
A Sapphic Ode for the Birthday
of My Beloved Father, Doctor Jesper Swedberg …
-
Assessor Polhem’s Reliable
Observations on the Air’s Resistance to Falling Weights and
Surfaces
-
Sketch of a Machine to Fly in
the Air
-
An Experiment with Round Shot
and Paper
-
An Experiment on the Resistance
of Water and Snow to Round Shot
-
A New and Reliable Method of
Finding East and West Longitudes … by Means of the Moon
-
The First and Easiest Way:
Accurate Location by Means of the Longitude Here
-
The Second Way: Find the
Difference of Meridians or Longitudes of a Place by Means of
the Aforementioned Stars
-
Behold, Daedalus takes to the
air … (Second Epigram for “Daedalus Hyperboreus”)
Documents Not Published
-
On Several Types of Soils and
Muds
-
Possible Draft on Reflections on
Perspective
-
Untitled Draft of a Memorial on
a Society of Sciences
-
Remarks on Mussels, Snails, and
So On in Limestone and on Slate
-
Description of a Daedalian or
Flying Machine
-
A Siphoning Machine
-
New Ways to Sail Against the
Stream …
-
Notes on Some Small Tests and
Experiments
-
Untitled Draft of a Design of a
Screw Jack
-
Stereometric Proportions and
Some New Principles of Stereometry
-
The Use of Water to Calculate
the Amount of Lead in Medium Quality Iron of the Same Weight
and Source
-
Description of a Crane
-
Experiment with Echoes
-
Memorandum on the Improvements
That Await Being Made at Carlscrona
-
Youth’s Honor (possibly written
by Polhem)
1717
Published Works
-
… Polhem’s Ingenious Tap …
-
Table for Calculating the
Volumes of Cubes, Cylinders, and Spheres When One Knows the
Surface Measurements in Inches
-
An Easy Analytical Method of
Demonstrating Both the Preceding and Other Points
Geometrically
-
Information about the Tinwork of
Steirsund, Its Use, and Tinning
-
An Easy Way of Counting Round
Shot Stacked Together in a Triangular Pile
-
A Proof That Our Vital Essence
Consists for the Most Part of Small Vibrations, That is, of
Tremulations
-
On a Rounded Line or Curve Whose
Dividing-Lines, That Is, Secants, Always Form Equal Angles
to the Curve
1721
Published Works
-
A Letter from Nobleman Emanuel
Swedenborg to the Celebrated Jacob a Melle (Indications of
the Earth’s Former Submersion)
-
A Precursor to the Basic
Principles of Nature or of New Attempts at a Geometrical
Explanation of Chemistry and Experimental Physics
-
New Observations and Discoveries
Regarding Iron adn Fire, Especially the Elementary Nature of
Fire; Also a New Furnace Design
-
A New Method of Finding the
Longitudes of Places on Land and at Sea with the Help of the
Moon
Documents Not Published
1733
Documents Not Published
-
On the Motion of the Elements in
General
-
Untitled Journal from October
1733 to March 1734
-
Untitled Notes on Wolff’s
“Empirical Psychology”
-
Untitled Quotation from Wolff’s
“Empirical Psychology”
-
Untitled Extracts from Shurig
1729
-
Untitled Translation of Extracts
from Richter 1722
-
Mechanism of the Soul and Body
from:
The Works of Emanuel Swedenborg in Chronological Order
1.2.1.1
Swedenborg's Autobiographical Letters
1. ANSWER TO A LETTER WRITTEN TO ME BY A
FRIEND. A LETTER FROM EMANUEL SWEDENBORG TO THE REV. THOMAS HARTLEY.{1}
I rejoice at the friendship which you manifest in
your letter; and I thank you sincerely for both, but especially for your
friendship. The praises with which you overwhelm me, I receive simply as
expressions of your love for the truths contained in my writings; and I refer
them, as their source, to the Lord, our Saviour, from whom is everything true,
because He is the Truth Itself (John xiv. 6). I have considered chiefly the
remarks you make at the close of your letter, where you express yourself as
follows: "If, perchance, after your departure from England, your writings
should be the subject of discussion, and occasion should arise for defending
you, their author, against some malignant slanderer, who may wish to injure
your reputation by a web of falsehoods--as those are in the habit of doing who
hate the truth--would it not be well for you, in order to repel such
slanderers, to leave with me some particulars respecting yourself, your
degrees in the University, the public offices you have filled, your friends
and relations, the honors which, I am told, have been conferred upon you, and
anything else that might be useful in establishing your good name, so that
ill-conceived prejudices may be removed; for it is our duty to use all lawful
means lest the cause of truth should suffer injury."
After reflecting on this, I have been led to yield
to your friendly advice, and will now communicate to you some particulars of
my life, which are briefly as follows:-
I was born at Stockholm on the 29th of January in
the year 1689.{2} My father's name was Jesper Swedberg, who was bishop of
West-Gothland, and a man of celebrity in his time. He was also elected and
enrolled as a member of the English Society, for the Propagation of the
Gospel; for he had been appointed by King Charles XII Bishop over the Swedish
churches in Pennsylvania, and also over the church in London. In the year 1710
I went abroad. I proceeded first to England, and afterwards to Holland,
France, and Germany, and returned home in the year 1714. 1 In the year 1716,
and also afterwards I had many conversations with Charles XII, King of Sweden,
who greatly favored me, and in the same year appointed me to the office of
Assessor in the College of Mines, which office I filled until the year 1747,
when I resigned it, retaining, however, the salary of the office during my
life. My sole object in resigning was that I might have more leisure to devote
to the new office enjoined on me by the Lord.
A higher post of honor was then offered me, which
I positively declined, lest my mind should be inspired with pride. In the year
1719, I was ennobled by Queen Ulrica Eleanora, and named Swedenborg; and from
that time I have taken my seat among the nobles of the rank of knighthood, in
the triennial sessions of the Diet. I am a Fellow and member, by invitation,
of the Royal Academy of Sciences in Stockholm; but I have never sought
admission into any literary society in any other place, because I am in an
angelic society, where such things as relate to heaven and the soul are the
only subjects of discourse; while in literary societies the world and the body
form the only subjects of discussion. In the year 1734, I published, at
Leipsic, the Regnum Minerale, in three volumes, folio. In the year 1738 I made
a journey to Italy, and staid a year at Venice and Rome.
With respect to my family connections, I had four
sisters. One of them was married to Eric Benzelius, who subsequently became
the Archbishop of Upsal, and through him I became related to the two
succeeding archbishops, who both belonged to the family of Benzelius, and were
younger brothers of Eric. My second sister was married to Lars Benzelstierna,
who became a provincial governor; but these two are dead. Two bishops,
however, who are related to me, are still living; one of them, whose name is
Filenius, and who is Bishop of East Gothland, officiates now as President of
the House of the Clergy in the Diet of Stockholm, in place of the Archbishop,
who is an invalid; he married my sister's daughter: the other, named
Benzelstierna, is Bishop of Westmanland and Dalecarlia; he is the son of my
second sister. Not to mention others of my relations who occupy stations of
honor.
Moreover, all the bishops of my native country,
who are ten in number, and also the sixteen senators, and the rest of those
highest in office, entertain feelings of affection for me; from their
affection they honor me, and I live with them on terms of familiarity, as a
friend among friends; the reason of which is, that they know I am in company
with angels. Even the King and the Queen, and the three princes, their sons,
show me great favor: I was also invited once by the King and Queen to dine
with them at their own table, which honor is generally accorded only to those
who are highest in office; subsequently the Crown Prince granted me the same
favor. They all desire me to return home; wherefore, I am far from
apprehending, in my own country, that persecution, which you fear, and against
which in your letter you desire in so friendly a manner to provide; and if
they persecute me elsewhere, it can do me no harm.
But all that I have thus far related, I consider
of comparatively little importance; for it is far exceeded by the
circumstance, that I have been called to a holy office by the Lord Himself,
who most mercifully appeared before me, His servant, in the year 1743; when He
opened my sight into the spiritual world, and granted me to speak with spirits
and angels, in which state I have continued up to the present day. From that
time I began to print and publish the various arcana that were seen by me and
revealed to me, as the arcana concerning Heaven and Hell, the state of man
after death, the true worship of God, the spiritual sense of the Word, besides
many other most important matters conducive to salvation and wisdom. The only
reason of my journeys abroad has been the desire of making myself useful, and
of making known the arcana that were entrusted to me. Moreover, I have as much
of this world's wealth as I need, and I neither seek nor wish for more.
Your letter has induced me to write all these
particulars, in order that as you say "ill-conceived prejudices may be
removed." Farewell; and from my heart I wish you all the happiness both in
this world, and the next; which I have not the least doubt you will attain, if
you look and pray to our Lord. EMAN. SWEDENBORG
@1 Rev. Thomas Hartley, A.M., a friend of
Swedenborg, and one of the first receivers of his doctrines, was a clergyman
of the Church of England, and rector of Winwick, Northamptonshire The letter
asking for particulars respecting Swedenborg's life, to which the above is a
reply, was written August 2, 1769 (See Documents Concerning Swedenborg Vol. I,
pp. 3-5, 6-9.--TR.$
@2 The original edition has "1689," which is
probably a printer's error. Swedenborg was born January 29, 1688.--TR. 1 The
original edition has "1714," but Swedenborg did not return to Sweden until
after April, 1715.--TR.
2. MY EARLY YOUTH. {1}
FROM A LETTER OF SWEDENBORG TO DR. BEYER.
I will now give you an account of my first youth:
From my fourth to my tenth year I was constantly engaged in thought upon God,
salvation, and the spiritual affections (passiones spirituales) of men; and
several times I revealed things at which my father and mother wondered:
saying, that angels must be speaking through me. From my sixth to my twelfth
year I used to delight in conversing with clergymen about faith, saying that
the life of faith is love, and that the love which imparts life is love to the
neighbor; also that God gives faith to everyone, but that those only receive
it who practice that love. I knew of no other faith at that time, than that
God is the Creator and Preserver of nature, that He imparts understanding and
a good disposition to men, and several other things that follow thence. I knew
nothing at that time of that learned faith which teaches that God the Father
imputes the righteousness of His Son to whomsoever, and at such times, as He
chooses even to those who have not repented and have not reformed their lives.
And had I beard of such a faith, it would have been then, as it is now, above
my comprehension.
I remain, with all affection and friendship,
Your most obedient servant and friend,
EMAN. SWEDENBORG
STOCKHOLM, November 14, 1769.
To the Reverend and Most Learned Doctor and Lector
GABRIEL AND. BEYER, Gottenburg.
@1 See Documents Concerning Swedenborg, Vol. II, pp. 278-280.$
Autobiographical statements from Swedenborg's
Writings
AC 5. That this is really the ease no one can
possibly know except from the Lord. It may therefore be stated in advance that
of the Lord's Divine mercy it has been granted me now for some years to be
constantly and uninterruptedly in company with spirits and angels, hearing
them speak and in turn speaking with them. In this way it has been given me to
hear and see wonderful things in the other life which have never before come
to the knowledge of any man, nor into his idea. I have been instructed in
regard to the different kinds of spirits; the state of souls after death;
hell, or the lamentable state of the unfaithful; heaven, or the blessed state
of the faithful; and especially in regard to the doctrine of faith which is
acknowledged in the universal heaven; on which subjects, of the Lord's Divine
mercy, more will be said in the following pages.
AC 59. The reason why the "vegetable and
the green of the herb" only are here described as food for the natural man, is
this. In the course of regeneration, when man is being made spiritual, he is
continually engaged in combat, on which account the church of the Lord is
called "militant;" for before regeneration cupidities have the dominion,
because the whole man is composed of mere cupidities and the falsities thence
derived. During regeneration these cupidities and falsities cannot be
instantaneously abolished, for this would be to destroy the whole man, such
being the only life which he has acquired; and therefore evil spirits are
suffered to continue with him for a long time, that they may excite his
cupidities, and that these may thus be loosened, in innumerable ways, even to
such a degree that they can be inclined by the Lord to good, and the man be
thus reformed.
In the time of combat, the evil spirits, who bear
the utmost hatred against all that is good and true, that is, against whatever
is of love and faith toward the Lord -which things alone are good and true,
because they have eternal life in them-leave the man nothing else for food but
what is compared to the vegetable and the green of the herb; nevertheless the
Lord gives him also a food which is compared to the herb bearing seed, and to
the tree in which is fruit, which are states of tranquillity and peace, with
their joys and delights and this food the Lord gives the man at intervals.
[2] Unless the Lord defended man every moment,
yea, even the smallest part of every moment, he would instantly perish, in
consequence of the indescribably intense and mortal hatred which prevails in
the world of spirits against the things relating to love and faith toward the
Lord. The certainty of this fact I can affirm, having been now for some years
(notwithstanding my remaining in the body) associated with spirits in the
other life, even with the worst of them, and I have sometimes been surrounded
by thousands, to whom it was permitted to spit forth their venom, and infest
me by all possible methods, yet without their being able to hurt a single hair
of my head, so secure was I under the Lord's protection. From so many years'
experience I have been thoroughly instructed concerning the world of spirits
and its nature, as well as concerning the combat which those being regenerated
must needs endure, in order to attain the happiness of eternal life. But as no
one can be so well instructed in such subjects by a general description as to
believe them with an undoubting faith, the particulars of the Lord's Divine
mercy will be related in the following pages.
AC 68. I am well aware that many will say
that no one can possibly speak with spirits and angels so long as he lives in
the body; and many will say that it is all fancy, others that I relate such
things in order to gain credence, and others will make other objections. But
by all this I am not deterred, for I have seen, I have heard, I have felt.
AC 70. As it is permitted me to disclose
what for several years I have heard and seen, it shall here be told, first,
how the case is with man when he is being resuscitated; or how he enters from
the life of the body into the life of eternity. In order that I might know
that men live after death, it has been given me to speak and be in company
with many who were known to me during their life in the body; and this not
merely for a day or a week, but for months, and almost a year, speaking and
associating with them just as in this world. They wondered exceedingly that
while they lived in the body they were, and that very many others are, in such
incredulity as to believe that they will not live after death; when in fact
scarcely a day intervenes after the death of the body before they are in the
other life; for death is a continuation of life.
AC 150. The state of man when in his Own,
or when he supposes that he lives from himself, is compared to "deep sleep,"
and indeed by the ancients was called deep sleep; and in the Word it is said
of such that they have "poured out upon them the spirit of deep sleep" (Isa.
xxix. 10), and that they sleep a sleep (Jer. li. 57). That man's Own is in
itself dead, and that no one has any life from himself, has been shown so
clearly in the world of spirits, that evil spirits who love nothing but their
Own, and obstinately insist that they live from themselves, were convinced by
sensible experience, and were forced to confess that they do not live from
themselves. For a number of years I have been permitted in an especial manner
to know how the case is with what is man's own, and it has been granted to me
to perceive clearly that I could think nothing from myself, but that every
idea of thought flows in, and sometimes I could perceive how and whence it
flowed in. The man who supposes that he lives from himself is therefore in
what is false, and by believing that he lives from himself appropriates to
himself everything evil and false, which he would never do if his belief were
in accordance with the real truth of the case.
AC 227. As it is desirable that the origin
of perception, internal dictate, and conscience, should be known, and as at
the present day it is altogether unknown, I may relate something on the
subject. It is a great truth that man is governed by the Lord by means of
spirits and angels. When evil spirits begin to rule, the angels labor to avert
evils and falsities, and hence arises a combat. It is this combat of which the
man is rendered sensible by perception, dictate, and conscience. By these, and
also by temptations, a man might clearly see that spirits and angels are with
him, were he not so deeply immersed in corporeal things as to believe nothing
that is said about spirits and angels. Such persons, even if they were to feel
these combats hundreds of times, would still say that they are imaginary, and
the effect of a disordered mind. I have been permitted to feel such combats,
and to have a vivid sense of them, thousands and thousands of times, and this
almost constantly for several years, as well as to know who, what, and where
they were that caused them, when they came, and when they departed; and I have
conversed with them.
AC 446. I have discoursed with spirits
concerning the common opinion that prevails among men at the present day, that
the existence of the spirit is not to be credited because they do not see it
with their eyes, nor comprehend it by their memory- knowledges (scientias),
and so they not only deny that the spirit has extension, but also that it is a
substance, disputing as to what substance is. And as they deny that it has
extension, and also dispute about substance, they also deny that the spirit is
in any place, and consequently that it is in the human body; and yet the most
simple might know that his soul or spirit is within his body. When I said
these things, the spirits, who were some of the more simple ones, marveled
that the men of the present day are so foolish. And when they heard the words
that are disputed about, such as "parts without parts," and other such terms,
they called them absurd, ridiculous, and farcical, which should not occupy the
mind at all, because they close the way to intelligence.
AC 448. I have conversed with many who had
been known to me in this life (and this I have done for a long time-for months
and years), in as clear a voice, although an inward one, as with friends in
this world. The subject of our conversation has sometimes been the state of
man after death, and they have wondered exceedingly that during the bodily
life no one knows or believes that he is so to live when the bodily life is
over, when yet there is then a continuation of life, and such a continuation
that the man passes from an obscure life into a clear one, and those who are
in faith in the Lord into a life that is more and more clear.
They have desired me to tell their friends that
they are alive, and to write and tell them what their condition is, even as I
had related to themselves many things about that of their friends here. But I
replied that were I to tell their friends such things, or to write to them
about them, they would not believe, but would call them delusions, would scoff
at them, and would ask for signs or miracles before they would believe; and I
should merely expose myself to their derision. And that these things are true,
perchance but few will believe. For at heart men deny the existence of
spirits, and even those who do not deny it are unwilling to hear that any one
can speak with spirits. In ancient times there was no such state of belief in
regard to spirits, but so it is now when by crazy ratiocination men try to
find out what spirits are, and by their definitions and suppositions deprive
them of all the senses, and do this the more, the more learned they desire to
be.
AC 449. Hitherto the nature of heaven and
of heavenly joy has been known to none. Those who have thought about them have
formed an idea concerning them so general and so gross as scarcely to amount
to any idea at all. What notion they have conceived on the subject I have been
able to learn most accurately from spirits who had recently passed from the
world into the other life; for when left to themselves, as if they were in
this world, they think in the same way. I may give a few examples.
AC 545. But in order that I might know the
nature and quality of heaven and of heavenly joy, for long and often I have
been permitted by the Lord to perceive the delights of heavenly joys, so that
as I know them from actual experience I can indeed know them, but can by no
means describe them. However, in order to give some idea of it I may say that
heavenly joy is an affection of innumerable delights and joys that form one
general simultaneous joy, in which general joy, that is, in which general
affection, there are harmonies of innumerable affections that do not come
distinctly to perception, but obscurely, because the perception is very
general. Yet I was permitted to perceive that there are things innumerable
within it, in such order as can never be described, these innumerable things
being such as flow from the order of heaven.
Such order exists in every least thing of the
affection, all of which together are presented and perceived as a very general
one according to the capacity of him who is the subject of it. In d word, in
every general joy or affection there are illimitable things ordinated in a
most perfect form, and there is nothing that is not alive or that does not
affect even the inmost things of our being, for heavenly joys proceed from
inmost things. I perceived also that the joy and deliciousness came as if from
the heart, and very softly diffused themselves through all the inmost fibers,
and so into the congregated fibers, with such an inmost sense of delight that
the fiber is as it were nothing but joy and deliciousness, and the whole
derivative perceptive and sensitive sphere the same, being alive with
happiness. In comparison with these joys the joy of bodily pleasures is like
gross and pungent dust as compared with a pure and gentle breeze.
AC 548. I have sometimes spoken with
spirits fresh from the world concerning the state of eternal life, telling
them how important it was for them to know who is the Lord of that kingdom,
and what is the nature and form of its government, just as those in this world
who go into another kingdom are especially interested to know who and of what
sort is the king, what is the nature of the government, and many other things
that belong to the kingdom; and how much more should they be interested in
this kingdom, where they are to live forever. I told them that the Lord alone
rules both heaven and the universe, for He who rules the on must rule the
other; and that the kingdom in which they were now is the Lord's kingdom, the
laws of which are eternal truths, all of which are based on the one great law
that men shall love the Lord above all things and their neighbor as
themselves, and now even more than themselves, for if they would be as the
angels this is what they must do.
To all this they could make no reply because in
their bodily life they had heard something of the kind, but had not believed
it. They marvelled that there is such love in heaven, and that it is possible
for any one to love his neighbor more than himself, seeing that they had heard
that they were to love their neighbor as themselves. But they were instructed
that in the other life all goods are immeasurably increased, and that the life
in the body is such that men can go no further than loving the neighbor as
themselves because they are in the things of the body, but that when these are
removed, the love becomes purer, and at last angelic, which consists in loving
the neighbor more than themselves. The possibility of such love is evident
from the conjugial love that exists with some persons, who would suffer death
rather than let their married partner be injured; and also from the love of
parents for their children, in that a mother will endure starvation rather
than see her infant hunger, and this even among birds and animals and likewise
from sincere friendship, in that perils will be undergone for our friends; and
even from polite and feigned friendship, that would emulate real friendship in
offering the better things to those to whom we wish well, making great
professions even when they do not come from the heart.
And finally its possibility is evident from the
very nature of love, which finds its joy in being of service to others, not
for the sake of self but for the love's own sake. But all this could not be
comprehended by those who loved themselves more than others, and who in the
bodily life had been greedy for gain, and least of all by the avaricious.
AC 561. But what are remains? They are not
only the goods and truths that a man has learned from the Lord's Word from
infancy, and has thus impressed on his memory, but they are also all the
states thence derived, such as states of innocence from infancy; states of
love toward parents, brothers, teachers, friends; states of charity toward the
neighbor, and also of pity for the poor and needy; in a word, all states of
god and truth. These states together with the goods and truths impressed on
the memory, are called remains, which are preserved in man by the Lord and are
stored up, entirely without his knowledge, in his internal man, and are
completely sept rated from the things that are proper to man, that is, from
evils and falsities.
All these states are so preserved in man by the
Lord that not the least of them is lost, as I have been given to know from the
fact that every state of a man, from his infancy to extreme old age, not only
remains in the other life, but also returns, in fact his states return exactly
as they were while he lived in this world Not only do the goods and truths of
memory thus remain and return, but also all states of innocence and charity.
And when states of evil and falsity recur-for each and all of these, even the
smallest, also remain and return-then these states are tempered by the Lord by
means of the good states. From all this it is evident that if a man had no
remains he must necessarily be in eternal damnation. (See what was said before
at n. 468.)
AC 699. That I might witness the torment of
those who are in hell, and the vastation of those who are in the lower earth,
I have at different times been let down thither. To be let down into hell is
not to be carried from one place to another, but to be let into some infernal
society, the man remaining in the same place. But I may here relate only this
experience: I plainly perceived that a kind of column surrounded me, and this
column was sensibly increased, and it was intimated to me that this was the
"wall of brass" spoken of in the Word. {1} The column was formed of angelic
spirits in order that I might safely descend to the unhappy. When I was there
I heard piteous lamentations, such as, O God! O God! take pity on us! take
pity on us! and this for a long time. I was permitted to speak to those
wretched ones, and this for a considerable time. They complained especially of
evil spirits in that they desired and burned for nothing else than to torment
them. They were in despair, saying that they believed their torment would be
eternal; but I was permitted to comfort them. @1 Jer. i. 18; xv. 20.$
AC 831. There are women who have lived in
the indulgence of their natural inclinations, caring only for themselves and
the world, and making the whole of life and the delight of life to consist in
outward decorum, in consequence of which they have been highly esteemed in
polite society. They have thus, by practice and habit, acquired the talent of
insinuating themselves into the desires and pleasures of others, under the
pretense of what is honorable, but with the purpose of gaining control over
them. Their life therefore became one of dissimulation and deceit. Like others
they frequented churches, but for no other end than that they might appear
virtuous and pious; and moreover they were without conscience, and very prone
to shameful acts and adulteries, so far as these could be concealed. Such
women think in the same way in the other life, knowing not what conscience is,
and ridiculing those who speak of it. They enter into the affections of
others, whatever these may be, by simulating virtue, piety, pity, and
innocence, which are their means of deceiving; but whenever outward restraints
are removed, they rush into things most wicked and obscene.
[2] These are the women who become enchantresses
or sorceresses in the other life, some of whom are those called Sirens; and
they there become expert in arts unknown in the world. They are like sponges
that imbibe nefarious artifices; and are of such talent that they quickly put
them in practice. The arts unknown in this world which they learn in the other
are these. They can speak as though they were in another place, so that their
voice is heard there as from good spirits. They can as it were be with many at
the same time, thus persuading others that they are as if present everywhere.
They can speak as several persons at the same time, and in several places at
the same time. They can turn aside what flows in from good spirits, even what
flows in from angelic spirits, and in divers ways pervert it instantly in
favor of themselves. They can put on the likeness of another, by the ideas of
him which they conceive and fashion. They can inspire any one with an
affection for themselves, by insinuating themselves into the very state of
another's affection. They can withdraw suddenly out of sight, and escape
unseen. They can represent before the eyes of spirits a white flame about the
head, which is an angelic sign, and this before many. They can in divers ways
feign innocence, even by representing infants whom they kiss. They also excite
others, whom they hate, to kill them (for they know they cannot die), and then
divulge it and accuse them of murder.
[3] They have called up out of my memory whatever
of evil I have thought and done, and this most skillfully. While I was asleep
they have talked with others, just as if from me, so that the spirits were
persuaded of it, thus of things false and obscene. And many other arts they
have. Their nature is so persuasive that no room is left therein for any
doubt; therefore their ideas are not communicated like those of other spirits.
And their eyes are like those ascribed to serpents, seeing and paying
attention every way at once. These sorceresses or sirens are grievously
punished, some in Gehenna, some in a kind of court among snakes; some by
wrenchings and various collisions, attended with the greatest pain and
torture. In course of time they are separated from all society and become like
skeletons from head to foot. A continuation of the subject follows at the end
of the chapter.
AC 842. [2] It is the same with one man
during temptation and when the commotions or waters of temptation cease, as it
is with man in general, as I have learned by repeated experience; for evil
spirits in the world of spirits sometimes band together in troops, and thereby
excite disturbances until they are dispersed by other bands of spirits, coming
mostly from the right, and so from the eastern quarter, who strike such fear
and terror into them that they think of nothing but flight. Then those who had
associated themselves are dispersed into all quarters, and thereby the
societies of spirits formed for evil purposes are dissolved. The troops of
spirits who thus disperse them are called the East Wind; and there are also
innumerable other methods of dispersion, also called "east winds," concerning
which, of the Lord's Divine mercy hereafter.
When evil spirits are thus dispersed, the state of
commotion and turbulence is succeeded by serenity, or silence, as is also the
case with the man who has been in temptation; for while in temptation he is in
the midst of such a band of spirits, but when they are driven away or
dispersed, there follows as it were a calm, which is the beginning of the
disposal of all things into order.
[3] Before anything is reduced into a state of
order, it is most usual that things should be reduced into a confused mass, or
chaos as it were, so that those which do not well cohere together may be
separated, and when they are separated, then the Lord disposes them into
order. This process may be compared with what takes place in nature, where all
things in general and singly are first reduced to a confused mass, before
being disposed into order. Thus, for instance, unless there were storms in the
atmosphere, to dissipate whatever is heterogeneous, the air could never become
serene, but would become deadly by pestiferous accumulations. So in like
manner in the human body, unless all things in the blood, both heterogeneous
and homogeneous, did continuously and successively Sow together into one
heart, to be there commingled, there would be deadly conglutinations of the
liquids, and they could in no way be distinctly disposed to their respective
uses. Thus also it is with man in the course of his regeneration.
AC 946. I have spoken with spirits
concerning the fact that possibly few will believe in the existence of so many
and such wonderful things in the other life, in consequence of the absence of
any but a very general and obscure conception - amounting to none at all - of
the life after death, and in which men have confirmed themselves by the
consideration that they do not see a soul or spirit with their eyes. Even the
learned, although they say there is a soul or spirit, so cleave to artificial
words and terms - which rather obscure or even extinguish the understanding of
things than assist it - and so devote themselves to self and the world, and
but rarely to the general welfare and to heaven, that they believe still less
than do sensuous men. The spirits to whom I spoke marveled that men should be
of such a character, seeing that they are well aware of the existence in
nature itself, and in each of its kingdoms, of many wonderful and varied
things about which they are ignorant, as for example those in the internal
human ear, concerning which a book might be filled with things amazing and
unheard of, and in the existence of which every one has faith. But if anything
is said about the spiritual world, from which come forth all things in the
kingdoms of nature both in general and in particular, scarcely any one gives
credence to it, on account - as before said - of the preconceived and
confirmed opinion that because it is not seen it is nothing.
AC 968. Certain spirits had brought with
them from the world the idea that they must not speak with the devil, but flee
from him. But they were instructed that it would do no harm at all to those
whom the Lord protects, even if they should be encompassed by all hell, both
within and without. This it has been given me to know by much and by marvelous
experience, so that at length I came to have no fear of even the worst of the
infernal crew, to hinder my speaking with them; and this was granted in order
that I might become acquainted with their character. To those who have
wondered that I spoke with them, I have been permitted to say not only that
this would do me no harm, but also that the devils in the other life are such
as have been men, and who when they lived in the world passed their life in
hatred, revenge, and adultery, some of them being then pre-eminently esteemed;
nag, that among them are some I had known in the bodily life; and that the
devil means nothing else than such a crew of hell. And furthermore, that men,
while they live in the body, have with them at least two spirits from hell, as
well as two angels from heaven; and that these infernal spirits rule with the
evil, but with the good have been subjugated and are compelled to serve. Thus
it is false to suppose that there has been a devil from the beginning of
creation, other than such as were once men. When they heard these things they
were amazed, and confessed that they had held a totally different opinion in
regard to the devil and the diabolical crew.
AC 1110. Those who have assumed
righteousness and merit on account of their good works, and so have attributed
the efficacy of salvation to themselves, and not to the Lord and His
righteousness and merit, and have confirmed themselves in this in thought and
in life, in the other world have their principles of falsity turned into
phantasies, so that they seem to themselves to be hewing wood: this is exactly
as it appears to them. I have spoken with them. When they are engaged in their
labor, and are asked whether they are not fatigued, they reply that they have
not yet accomplished enough work to be able to merit heaven. When they are
hewing the wood there appears to be something of the Lord under the wood, thus
as if the wood were merit that they are getting. The more of the Lord there
appears in the wood, the longer they remain in this condition; but when that
appearance begins to cease, their vastation is drawing to an end. At length
they become such that they too can be admitted into good societies, but still
they long fluctuate between truth and falsity. Great care is taken of them by
the Lord, because they have lived a dutiful life, and He from time to time
sends angels to them. These are they who in the Jewish Church were represented
by the hewers of wood (Josh. ix. 23, 27).
AC 1116. Dwellings were shown me of those
who were of the second and third posterities of this Most Ancient Church. They
are magnificent, extending to a great length, and diversified with beautiful
colors of bright crimson and cure blue. For the angels have most magnificent
dwellings, such as cannot be described, as I have often seen. To their eyes so
real is their appearance that nothing can be more real. But whence such real
appearances come, will be shown of the Lord's Divine mercy hereafter. They
live in an aura, so to speak, of resplendent pearly and sometimes of
diamond-like light. For there are wonderful auras in the other life, of
inexpressible variety. They greatly err who do not believe that such things
exist there, and indefinitely more than any one ever could or can conceive.
They are indeed representative, like the things sometimes seen by the prophets
but yet are so real that they who are in the other life hold them to be real,
and the things which are in the world to be relatively unreal.
AC 1121. I have been informed by sons of
the Most Ancient Church concerning the state of their perception, that they
had perception of all things that belong to faith, almost as have the angels
with whom they had communication; for the reason that their interior man, or
spirit, by means also of the internal respiration, was joined to heaven; and
that love to the Lord and love toward the neighbor are attended with this; for
man is thus conjoined with angels through their veriest life, which consists
in such love. They said that they had the law written upon them, because they
were in love to the Lord and love toward the neighbor; and such being the
case, whatever the laws prescribe was in agreement with their perception, and
whatever the laws forbid was contrary to it. Nor did they doubt that all laws,
human as well as Divine, are founded in love to the Lord and charity toward
the neighbor, and regard these as their fundamental. Wherefore, as they had
this fundamental in them, from the Lord, they could not but know all things
that were from it. They believe too that those who live in the world at this
day, who love the Lord and the neighbor, have also the law written upon them,
and are acceptable citizens everywhere on earth, as the same are in the other
life.
AC 1122. I have been further informed that
the men of the Most Ancient Church had most delightful dreams, and also
visions, and that it was insinuated into them at the same time what they
signified. Hence their paradisal representations, and many other things. The
objects of the external senses therefore, which are earthly and worldly, were
nothing to them; nor had they any perception of delight in them, but only in
what they signified and represented; and therefore when they looked at earthly
objects they did not think about them at all, but only about the things which
they signified and represented, which were most delightful to them; for they
were such things as are in heaven, from which they see the Lord Himself.
AC 1270. Presently some were let out of
that hell; but the Lord made such a disposition by means of intermediate
spirits and angels that they could do me no harm. Out of that deep they came
in front, and appeared to themselves to be working their way toward the front,
as it were through caverns in the rock, and so upward. At last they appeared
from above to the left, in order that from there, and thus from a distance,
they might inflow into me. I was told that they were permitted to inflow into
the right side of the head, but not into the left side; and from the right
side of the head into the left side of the chest; but by no means into the
left of the head, for if this occurred I should be destroyed, because they
would then flow in with their persuasions, which are direful and deadly;
whereas if they flowed into the right of the head, and thence into the left of
the chest, it would be by means of cupidities. Such is the case with influx.
[2] Their persuasions are of such a nature that
they extinguish all truth and good, so that those into whom they flow can
perceive nothing whatever, and after that cannot think; and therefore the
other spirits were removed. When they began to flow in I fell asleep. Then
while I slept they flowed in by means of cupidities, and this with such
violence that if awake I could not have resisted them. In my sleep I was
sensible of the vehemence of it, which I cannot describe, save that I
afterwards remembered that they tried to kill me by a suffocating afflatus,
which was like a terrible nightmare. Then, waking, I observed that they were
near me; and when they perceived that I was awake, they fled away to their own
place above, and flowed in from thence.
[3] When they were there they appeared to me as if
they were being wrapped up in a cloth, such as was spoken of before (n. 964).
I thought they were being thus wrapped up, but it was others whom they were
wrapping up. This is effected by means of phantasies; but yet the spirits
against whom they thus work by phantasies know not but that they are really
being wrapped up. It appeared as if those whom they thus wrapped up rolled
down a certain rocky declivity. But those who were thus wrapped up were
released and set at liberty. They were spirits who were unwilling to withdraw,
and who were thus preserved by the Lord, for otherwise they would have been
suffocated-although they would have revived again, but after great suffering.
The spirits from that hell then went back by the rocky declivity; and there
was heard from thence a sound of boring, as if many great boring instruments
were at work; and it was perceived that it was from their intensely cruel
phantasies against the Lord that such a sound came. They were afterwards cast
down through dark caverns into their hell beneath the misty rock. While they
were in the world of spirits, the constitution or order of the sphere there
was changed. {1}
@1 See Spiritual Diary, n. 3367. [Reviser.]$
AC 1376.CONTINUATION CONCERNING SITUATION
AND PLACE, AND ALSO CONCERNING DISTANCE AND TIME, IN THE OTHER LIFE. I have
frequently conversed with spirits concerning the idea of place and of distance
among them-that it is not anything real, but appears as if it were, being
nothing else than their states of thought and of affection, which are thus
varied, and are in this manner presented to view in the world of spirits; but
not so much so in heaven among the angels, since these are not in the idea of
place and time, but in that of states. But the spirits to whom bodily and
earthly ideas adhere, do not apprehend this, for they suppose that the case is
exactly as they see it to be. Such spirits can hardly be brought to believe
otherwise than that they are living in the body, and are not willing to be
persuaded that they are spirits; and thus scarcely that there is any
appearance, or any fallacy, in relation to the matter, for they desire to live
in fallacies. Thus do they preclude themselves from the apprehension and
acknowledgment of truths and goods, which are as far as possible from
fallacies. It has been shown them many times that change of place is nothing
but an appearance, and also a fallacy of sense. For there are two kinds of
mutation of place in the other life; one is that which has been spoken of
before, when it is laid that all spirits and angels in the Grand Man
constantly keep their own situation therein; which is an appearance. The other
is that spirits appear in a place when in fact they are not there, which is a
fallacy.
AC 1378. I have been informed, both by
conversation with angels, and by living experience, that spirits, as spirits,
in regard to the organic forms which constitute their bodies, are not in the
place where they are seen, but may be far away, and yet appear there. I know
that they who suffer themselves to be carried away by fallacies will not
believe this, but still the case is so. This has been illustrated to those
spirits who have believed nothing to be true that they did not see with their
eyes - even if this were mere fallacy - by the fact that something similar is
exhibited among men in the world. Take for instance the sound of a speaker's
voice coming to the ear of another person: if the person who hears it did not
know to the contrary, by the discriminations of sound, learned by experience
from infancy, and did not see the speaker at a distance, he would have no
other belief than that the speaker was close to his ear.
So with a man who sees remote objects: if be did
not at the same time see intervening objects, and know from them, or judge of
the distance by what he knows, he would believe a distant object to be near
his eye. Much more is this the case with the speech of spirits, which is
interior speech; and with their sight, which is interior sight.
[2] And the spirits were told, further, that when
plain experience declares a fact, they ought not to doubt, and still less deny
it, on the ground that it does not so appear to the senses, and that they do
not perceive it. For even within the realm of nature there are many things
that are contrary to the fallacies of the senses, but are believed because
visible experience teaches them. For example, the sailing of a ship around the
globe: they who suffer themselves to be carried away by the fallacies of the
senses, might believe that ship and sailors would fall off when they came to
the opposite side, and that the people at the antipodes could never stand upon
their feet. Such also is the case with the subject before us, and with many
things in the other life that are contrary to the fallacies of the senses, and
yet are true, - as that man has no life of himself, but from the Lord; and
very many other things. By these and other considerations, incredulous spirits
could be brought to believe that the case is as we have stated it.
AC 1387. I have several times conversed
about perception with those in the other life who, while they lived in the
world, had regarded themselves as able to penetrate and understand all things
telling them that angels perceive that they think and speak, and will and act
from the Lord. But still they could not conceive what perception is, but
supposed that if all things were to inflow in this way, they would be bereaved
of all life; because in that case they would think nothing from themselves, or
from what is their own; and in this they had made life to consist; and that in
that case it would be another who was thinking, and not themselves; so that
they would be mere organs devoid of life. But they were told that between
having perception, and not having it, the difference of life is like that
between light and darkness; and that men first begin to feel alive when they
receive such perception; for then they live from the Lord, and also have what
is their own, which is given together with all happiness and delight. It was
also shown them by varied experience how the case is with perception, and at
the time they acknowledged the possibility of it; but after a while they again
did not know, doubted, and denied. From this it has been made evident how
difficult it is for man to comprehend what perception is.
AC 1505. I have also been informed how
these spheres, which in the other life become so perceptible to the senses,
are acquired. Take as an example one who has formed a high opinion of himself
and of his own pre-eminent excellence. He at last becomes imbued with such a
habit, and as it were with such a nature, that wherever he goes, though he
looks at others and speaks with them, he keeps himself in view; and this at
first manifestly, but afterwards not manifestly, so that he is not aware of
it; but still it is regnant, both in the particulars of his affection and
thought, and in those of his bearing and speech. Men can see this in others.
And this is the kind of thing that in the other life makes a sphere, which is
perceived, but no more frequently than the Lord permits. The same is the case
with other affections; and therefore there are as many spheres as there are
affections and combinations of affections, which are innumerable. The sphere
is as it were the man's image extended outside of himself, the image in fact
of all things that are in him. In the world of spirits that which is presented
to the view or perception is only something general; what the man is as to
particulars, is known in heaven; but what as to the least particulars is known
to none but the Lord.
AC 1523. That I might know the nature of
that light, I have often been conducted into the abodes of good and of angelic
spirits, and have seen both the spirits and the objects there. I have also
seen infants and mothers in light of so great a brightness and resplendence
that there could not possibly be anything brighter.
AC 1628. All the angels have their own
dwellings in the places where they are, and they are magnificent. I have been
there, and have sometimes seen and marveled at them, and have there spoken
with the angels. They are so distinct and clearly seen that nothing can be
more so. In comparison with these, the habitations on earth amount to scarcely
anything. They also call those which are on the earth dead, and not real; but
their own, living and true, because from the Lord. The architecture is such
that the art itself is derived from it, with a variety that knows no limit.
They have said that if all the palaces in the whole world should be given
them, they would not receive them in exchange for their own. What is made of
stone, clay, and wood is to them dead; but what is from the Lord, and from
life itself and light itself, is living; and this is the more the case that
they enjoy them with all fullness of sense. For the things that are there are
perfectly adapted to the senses of spirits and angels; for spirits cannot see
at all by their sight the things that are in the light of the solar world; but
things of stone and wood are adapted to the senses of men in the body.
Spiritual things are in correspondence with those who are spiritual, and
corporeal things with those who are corporeal.
AC 1635. The speech of spirits with me has
been heard and perceived as distinctly as the speech of man with man; indeed,
when I have spoken with them while I have been in company with men, I observed
that just in the same way as I heard the men speaking sonorously, so also did
I hear the spirits; insomuch that the spirits sometimes wondered that others
did not hear what they said to me; for as regards the hearing there was
absolutely no difference. But as the influx into the internal organs of
hearing is different from that of speech with men, it could be heard only by
myself; to whom of the Lord's Divine mercy these organs have been opened.
Human speech passes in through the ear, by an external way, by means of the
air; but the speech of spirits does not enter through the ear, nor by means of
the air; but by an internal way, into the same organs of the head or brain.
Consequently the hearing is the same.
For additional autobiographical statements by
Swedenborg, see the Swedenborg Compendium Selections to the Writings Sacred
Scripture Keyed to Theistic Psychology Subjects for the entry [EXPERIMENTS
CONDUCTED BY SWEDENBORG IN SPIRITUAL WORLD]
www.soc.hawaii.edu/leonj/theistic/#selections
1.3
Rational
Substantive Dualism
Here is a contrastive Table that
will help in keeping track of the distinction between a rational or
scientific view on Swedenborg, as in theistic psychology, and a mystical
view of Swedenborg as in the anthology: Testimony to the Invisible:
Essays on Swedenborg. Edited (1995) by James Lawrance (Swedenborg
Foundation). For reviews see Generation 21 reports at
www.soc.hawaii.edu/leonj/459f2004
| |
Two Contrastive Views on
the Writings of Swedenborg |
| |
NON-SUBSTANTIVE DUALISM
(mystical and sensuous)
|
SUBSTANTIVE DUALISM
-- Theistic Psychology
(rational and scientific) |
|
1 |
Swedenborg is called a "visionary" and what he
reports are called "visions." |
Swedenborg is called a "dual
citizen" and his Writings are "scientific reports."
(See Section xx)
|
| 2 |
Swedenborg's communication with spirits is viewed as
"spiritism" or "shamanism" or "mystical oneness with God." |
Swedenborg enjoyed "dual citizenship" or the ability to be
conscious simultaneously in both his "natural mind" and his "spiritual
mind." (See Section xx) |
| 3 |
Swedenborg was able to "probe the depth" of the
sub-conscious mind and achieve "supra-consciousness." |
Swedenborg described what he could see and hear in the
spiritual world of the afterlife, and used a rational or scientific
explanatory approach and content in his
reports. (See Section xx) |
| 4 |
Swedenborg was a "great genius on the edge of sanity" and insanity. |
Swedenborg had the orientation of a rational and empirical
scientist doing field work and running experiments in the spiritual world
of eternity. (See Section xx) |
| 5 |
Swedenborg was a "pioneer explorer," continuing the work of
other "visionaries and mystics" in the preceding centuries and millennia. |
Swedenborg was a unique case in all of history and had a
specific Divinely commissioned task, that of giving a scientific
description of the mental world of the afterlife by being given access to interviews,
experiments, and travel in the spiritual world for 27 years. (See Section
xx) |
| 6 |
Swedenborg's "visionary experiences" are edifying and
stimulating intellectually but they should not be taken literally.
|
Swedenborg proved the validity of his
empirical reports and
observations by showing that Sacred Scripture was written in an ancient
code called "correspondences" which matched perfectly the objective
observations he made of the events and scenes in the spiritual world of
eternity. (See Section xx)
|
| 7 |
Swedenborg's writings are "hard to understand," written in a
pedantic theological style, heavy, dry, dull, but always brilliant. |
Swedenborg's Writings are easy to understand, crystal
clear, completely rational, integrated and fully consistent. |
The mind-body issue is one of the
oldest in psychology. It may still be seen today as a key issue that impacts
on all of psychology. Today the most advanced views on the mind-body issue
in psychology take two main forms which can be called epiphenomenalism and
mystical dualism. These two stand in contrast with the substantive dualism
of theistic psychology. A review of current scientific views on
consciousness and the mind can be consulted at these Web locations:
www.newdualism.org
http://jamaica.u.arizona.edu/~chalmers/online.html
www.klab.caltech.edu/~koch/crick-koch-cc-97.html
Epiphenomenalism is the view
that the mind -- feelings, thoughts, sensations--is not a functioning organ
but a subjective by-product of the operations of the brain. Sometimes the
word "emergent" phenomena is used to indicate that the operations of the
brain can be abstracted somehow into sensations or feelings. In other words
our feelings and sensations are not as real as the brain. This view sees the
operations of the brain as objective, whereas the feelings and thoughts "the
brain
gives rise to," are subjective, which means that they do not have an
independent objective existence. This approach is not practical as it
relegates the most important feature of humans to nonexistence. With this
view, humans are just a more advanced form of animals. When the brain dies,
so does the mind. God and immortality are not recognized as part of the
reality of our life and future.
Dualism
is the view that the mind is a separate and independent type of phenomenon
than the physical brain. The mind has an objective existence just like the
brain. It is common to suppose that the mind survives the death of the
physical brain, though no one in modern psychology has given an adequate or
comprehensive account of what happens when the brain dies. The ancient
psychologists like Aristotle and Plato knew that the mind must be an
immortal organ because it is capable of wisdom, and this is not material but
spiritual and eternal. The Egyptians, the Greeks, the Hindus all had
detailed accounts of what happens to the mind (or "soul") when the physical
body dies. But in modern science all this was rejected.
Rene Descartes (1596-1650) is named
in the history of psychology textbooks as the first modern psychology
thinker who held the approach of "dualism" since he claimed that the body is
a biological robot and only the mind or soul has sensations and feelings.
However, since he was unable to give a rational account of what the "soul"
is or how it survives without the body, his dualism has been relegated to
history. Swedenborg (1688-1772) was the first modern psychologist who was
able to give a completely rational and scientific account of how the mind
survives at the death of the physical body. Before discussing Swedenborg's
"substantive dualism" there is also a form of dualism that is different from
either Descartes or Swedenborg, so I'd like to refer to it as "mystical dualism."
Mystical dualism is the
approach represented by several well known authors who have had a special
interest in Swedenborg. A sample of this group is represented by the articles and comments on Swedenborg
that appear in
a collection titled Testimony to the Invisible (see
Reading List below).
Both Western and Eastern philosophy and religion share this mystical view on the mind
and God. It is the idea that humans have the capacity to experience the
"divine in themselves," which they take to be the same as the objective Divine God. In
other words human beings are of one substance with the Divine. Under the right
conditions of meditation it is possible to "feel one with the Divine." The
experience of "ecstasy" has been described by many authors for centuries and popular
intellectual movements have been based on this kind of sensuous approach to God. It has been
called mystical because the experience is subjective, difficult or impossible to
describe afterwards except in words that do not do it justice. So when
others read these descriptions they cannot really know what the experience
was like, and certainly they cannot experience it themselves by reading the
descriptions. William James also reviews this approach in his well known
book Varieties of Religious Experiences (see
Reading List).
His views in that book have had a strong influence on the development of the
other "new age" movements in psychology. As a
result, non-theistic psychology has created an non-theistic psychology of
religion, which sounds like quite an anomaly!
In Testimony to the Invisible Wilson Van Dusen describes himself as a mystic who has had this
experience of "oneness with God" and has been trying to develop techniques of meditation that others can
use to also achieve this experience. The other authors in that book are not
themselves mystics but describe Swedenborg as a mystic. In other words they
reject the view of "substantive dualism" as described in theistic
psychology. They claim that
Swedenborg was not a scientist but a visionary mystic who tried to describe
his experiences in terms of an allegory of the spiritual world and the
people he "visited" there, not unlike the highly regarded poetic fiction of William Blake
(1757-1827), who had read Swedenborg and wrote imaginative poetry to
describe the Heaven and Hell Swedenborg describes. All mystical dualists,
and the transcendentalists (Ralph Waldo Emerson,
1803-1882), have rejected the idea that Swedenborg actually traveled to the
spiritual world and did observations and experiments there.
Substantive dualism is based
uniquely on the Writings of Swedenborg because he is the only one who had
access to the spiritual world for observation and experimentation.
Theistic psychology is based on this
objective approach. There are two worlds, natural and spiritual, and they
are connected by the laws of correspondence. Whatever happens in the natural
world is an effect whose cause is in the spiritual world. This is called
"substantive" dualism because it specifies two functionally connected worlds
each with its objective reality. The natural world is made of matter,
energy, space, and time. All things in the natural world are temporal. The
spiritual world also has its Sun but it is made not of matter, but of
spiritual substances that are outside time and space. Spiritual objects are
immortal or eternal. The mind is a spiritual organ that is born
simultaneously with the physical body. The mind is also called the spiritual
body. The shape and form of the mind is the same as the body. In other
words, the mind is not just within the brain but within every cell of the
body, so that the mind as a whole, has the shape of the body. More
correctly, it is the physical body that is formed to correspond to the shape
of the mental body or mind since spiritual things precede and cause natural
things.
The mind or spiritual body is also
called the "spirit" and "soul."
Because the mind has the shape of
the physical body, the mental body also has hands, legs, torso, genitals, a
brain, etc. Everything the physical body can do and sense, the mind-body or
"spirit" can also sense and feel (in the spiritual world), but far more
keenly and intensely. As the physical body grows, so does the spiritual body
or mind. The experiences, memories, feelings, thoughts, choices, are all
situated in the mind, not the physical brain. Feelings, thoughts, and
sensations operate within the mind, each in a different sub-organ of the
mind. Feelings operate in the affective organ, thoughts in the
cognitive organ, sensations in the sensorimotor organ. Further,
these mental organs operate together at three different non-overlapping
discrete levels called natural, spiritual, and celestial. The natural mind
contains the memories and experiences we obtain with the physical body, but
the spiritual and celestial mind contain the "influx" or inflow of
information from the spiritual world. So the content of the three mental
organs are different but they are functionally interconnected by the
laws of correspondence. Upon the death of the physical body, we appear to
ourselves to awaken in the spiritual body in the spiritual world, where we
continue life forever.
Substantive dualism is based
entirely on Swedenborg's "dual citizenship," that is, his unique ability to
be conscious in the spiritual world while he was still connected to the
physical body. This ability to be conscious in the spiritual world is
fundamentally different from the experience described by mystical dualism.
Quoting from the Writings of Swedenborg:
TCR 793. A person is just as much a person after death,
although he is then invisible to the eyes of the material body. This can be
established from the cases of the angels seen by Abraham, Hagar, Gideon,
Daniel and some of the prophets, from the angels seen in the Lord's tomb, And
afterwards on many occasions by John, as he describes in Revelation. Above
all, this is proved by the Lord Himself, who showed by touch and by eating
that He was a human being, although He Vanished from their sight. Can anyone
be so crazy as not to acknowledge that, although invisible, He was just as
much a human being? The reason they saw Him was that the eyes of their spirit
were opened; and when these are opened things in the spiritual world
appear just as plain as things in the natural world. The difference between
people in the natural world and those in the spiritual world is that those in
the spiritual world are clothed with a substantial body, but those in the
natural world are clothed with a material body. This, however, has the
substantial body within it, and a substantial person can see another one just
as clearly as a material person can see another one. But a substantial person
cannot see a material one, nor a material person a substantial one, on account
of the difference between the material and the substantial. This is capable of
being described, but not briefly. (TCR 793)
Swedenborg was not in a trance
or meditating or in the throes of some mystical unition with God. He was
fully conscious as a scientist, just like doing field trip research in some foreign
land. He saw cities, lands, lakes, gardens, animals, people whom he called
spirits, angels, and devils, depending on their state of life and
personality. The mystics and visionaries have experiences that are so different from
Swedenborg's travelogue approach that they reject the idea that Swedenborg
actually went through those places in the spiritual world. Instead, they
believe that Swedenborg chose to write in that way about his mystical
experiences. But this idea completely destroys Swedenborg's objective
credibility, which gives the mystics and critics freedom to re-interpret
what Swedenborg is saying so that it may agree with their preferred picture
of the mind. Theistic psychology would not be possible under such
circumstances. We would merely fall back on a mixture of obscure
descriptions of various experiences by various people, not unlike the dead
end that psychology encounters in William James' Variety of Religious
Experiences.
The great news about substantive
dualism is that the geography of the spiritual world is identical to the
anatomy of the mind.
With this astonishing discovery
Swedenborg was able to describe the anatomy of the mind by means of the
objective observation of the geographic features of the spiritual world (see
Section xx).
For instance, he found that
the spiritual world has three regions -- heaven, the world of spirits, and
hell. These three regions are therefore in the mind. Every individual has a
heaven and a hell in the mind. Swedenborg observed how some people arriving
into the spiritual world at death, raise themselves into their heaven while
others immerse themselves into their hell. This activity depends on the
content of their mind, their personality and character.
Another great news is that while we
are still tied to the physical body on earth we appear alone in our mind to
ourselves, but not to the others who are already fully conscious in the
spiritual world. They can see our mind and its general content. They cannot
see the physical body since they lost direct contact with the natural
world upon the death of their physical body. But they can see our spiritual
body which actually houses our mind and its content. And we can see theirs
as soon as we enter the spiritual world at the death of our physical body. Until then our conscious awareness is restricted to the natural
mind and its attachment to sensory input from the physical body.
Another great news of substantive
dualism is that our life of eternity in the spiritual body can be and must
be prepared for. Our lot or level of life in eternity is completely
determined by the content of the personality and character we have developed
while living on earth. Hence any individual can make the conscious choices
now that will later lead to eternal happiness and super-natural abilities.
Although we can no longer have
interaction with earth we have something far greater and neater. In the
state of mind called "heaven," our mind has the power to create the quality
of our environment -- unimaginable treasures of architecture, art, apparel,
food, knowledge, wisdom, truth, love, travel, entertainment, work
opportunities, etc. Of course these things are entirely different from earth
where these things are external to our mind while in "heaven" they are
internal. For instance, food is not required for survival yet it appears on
the table at social occasions, and their taste and quality is unimaginably
superior and novel, as witnessed many times by Swedenborg. Similarly with
your clothes which appear as a surprise in closets or directly on your
spiritual body. Similarly with housing, which Swedenborg was unable to
describe due to their un-earthly "ineffable" magnificence and architecture.
You can see from these types of
observational reports by Swedenborg that most scientists of his day
dismissed them as fancy. How was this received by the many famous authors
and philosophers who called Swedenborg one of the greatest geniuses in
history, like Emerson and the contributors to Testimony? They viewed it as
Swedenborg's literary device (or trick) with which he tried to present his
philosophical, poetic, and theological insights.
But theistic psychology makes sense
as a science only if Swedenborg's reports are made of actual, real,
empirical observations and experiments.
When I first started reading the
Writings of Swedenborg in 1981 it never occurred to me to take his reports
as an allegory or poetic artifact. I had been a professional scientist and
psychology professor for twenty years before that and all my readings had to
do with science and psychology. Reading Swedenborg was a unique experience
since no one else has made such claims and justified them with evidence and
rational analysis. Years later I began to discover that his Writings were
actually famous in literature and that a new religion had been founded on
them. To my amazement none of these sympathetic readers saw Swedenborg's
reports as scientific revelations.
It appears then that I am a
forerunner of the future of science in that I clearly see and understand
that the Writings of Swedenborg are scientific revelations. This book on theistic psychology
is therefore the first time in history that
the reports from the Writings of Swedenborg are used in a seminar in
psychology as science. Note however that other scientists who disagree with
my approach would say that I am extending and enlarging the meaning of
science in an illegitimate way that is neither rational nor productive, just
personal and subjective. Let us keep this criticism in mind as we go through
the evidence from the Swedenborg reports. I intend to show that they are rational,
factual, and verifiable in some modified sense. Also, that these scientific
revelations collected and integrated into a theistic psychology imparts
knowledge of a new source of mental power by which we can engineer our
eternal future and happiness.
The potential benefits of theistic psychology are quite
significant. As you study theistic psychology you will have a choice between
two common reactions. One is to decide that the evidence I present is
insufficient in your opinion to prove the case that theistic psychology is a
science. The other is that the evidence is sufficient to merit further
study, and especially, reading the Writings. People making either choice
will benefit from the study of theistic psychology, as long as they allowed
themselves freedom from the negative bias in science while examining the evidence.
I recommend that you keep track of the progression of
your thoughts as you read theistic psychology. Write them down in a notebook
so that you can examine the course of your involvement and reactions. The
topics of theistic psychology are inherently interesting to most people
because they deal with God and the afterlife in a factual manner rather than
hypothetical or subjective. For 27 years Swedenborg daily travels through
the lands of the afterlife called heaven and hell and takes careful notes,
then he adds his rational genius to give us a scientific explanation of what
he hears and sees, to whom he talks and what they said, including God,
spirits, devils, and angels. This sounds psychotic to the negative bias
psychology of materialism. This is an inescapable judgment in the negative
bias in science--What
else but crazy is a man who talks to God, devils, and angels, and especially
crazy if he is a scientist. And yet Swedenborg was a famous scientist, well
respected and the opposite of crazy.
There is a legitimate reaction to hearing about
the contents of Swedenborg's Writings. And this is to take into account that
I am not crazy, that the other scholars and scientists referred to in the
Readings are not crazy, and that the hundreds of authors in the literature
who give homage to Swedenborg, are not crazy. The craziness impression comes
only when one refuses to budge from the negative bias materialism of
non-theistic psychology. It would be reasonable to say that in view of what
I am saying and what the others have said about Swedenborg, one has the rare
opportunity here to examine evidence of the afterlife in a systematic way,
as presented by a practicing modern scientist like myself. All you need to
do to make this examination real and objective, is to be willing to grant that
the Swedenborg reports may be reliable and scientific observations
rather than delusions. This is called adopting the positive bias in science.
The negative bias in science would be to decide in advance that the
Swedenborg reports cannot be scientific (hence he is
delusional, and I am a fool for believing them).
See also: James, William. (1898). Human Immortality. Online at:
www.soc.hawaii.edu/leonj/theistic/William-James-immortality.htm
1.3.1
The Psychology of Religion in
Nontheistic Psychology
Quoting from an article on the Web:
http://www.psywww.com/psyrelig/USA.html
Psychology of Religion in the USA
Michael E. Nielsen, Ph.D. Georgia Southern
University February, 2000
The psychological study of religion in the USA
illustrates tensions and opportunities that exist between psychology and
religion. It also demonstrates the multifaceted views taken by psychologists
as they address areas of living that have personal implications. In this
article I summarize how American psychologists have dealt with religion in
their profession, and characterize the psychology of religion as a field of
inquiry.
(...)
Following the early period, American
psychology's push toward behaviorism resulted in the neglect of spiritual
matters. The reductionist methods of behaviorism left little room for matters
of faith, or for any other theoretical constructs that were not measured
directly. Consequently, psychology left religion for other topics that were
considered to be more scientific, and several decades of neglect ensued.
Psychologists' interest in religion resumed
in the 1950s. Gordon Allport's (1950) attempt to describe the role of religion
in people's experience began his indelible mark on the field, and to this day
his Intrinsic - Extrinsic distinction in religious motivation remains the most
influential approach in psychological studies of religion in the USA. In the
years since then, several developments have combined to suggest, according to
the traditional view of psychology of religion, that the field is experiencing
a resurgence of interest. These include the establishment of professional
journals giving an outlet to psychological research on religious topics, a
division of the American Psychological Association dedicated to the
psychological study of religion, and the apparently increasing availability of
college classes focusing on psychology of religion.
(...)
The place of religion in American psychology
stems largely from methodological assumptions underlying the two fields of
inquiry. Primary among these is the psychological
assumption of reductionism. At its core, this view-that
scientists understand something by examining the effects of its component
parts-is at odds with the religious assumption that the world cannot be taken
at face value. The prototypic psychological scientist emphasizes
methodological rigor and considers knowledge gained by intuition or mysticism
to be of little value. Dispassionate science, according to this viewpoint,
offers a more sure way to understand the world than do other modes of
knowledge, which are more likely to yield biased and unreliable knowledge.
In addition, as Wulff (1991) points out,
psychologists who study other phenomena assume that those phenomena are real.
Psychologists who study religion, however, address
"an object whose reality can be received only in the state of faith"
(p. 32). The act of belief is critical to religious knowledge and experience.
In psychology, skepticism is an enduring value, but in religion it is an
intermediate step on the pathway to belief. This sets up a tension between
psychology and religion, which results in psychologists having low rates of
religious activity, when compared to other scientific and academic groups
(Richards & Bergin, 1997). The methods and assumptions favored by psychology
have appeared to be incompatible with the more subjective and experiential
methods of religion despite recent efforts to harmonize the two (Richards &
Bergin, 1997).
(...)
There is some evidence of increasing
interest in religion among American psychologists, or at least of increased
visibility of religious issues among psychologists. For example, religion was
the cover story of the August 1996 APA Monitor, the monthly news organ of the
American Psychological Association. The APA also has published several books
that address the role of religion in counseling or clinical psychological
practice. Among these books is one by Richards and Bergin (1997) who suggest
not only that therapy is more effective when it respectfully addresses
clients' religious beliefs, but also that it is possible to have a "theistic"
psychology that includes God.
A more encyclopedic view of religion in
clinical psychology in the USA is found in Shafranske's (1996) book, which
offers several different perspectives -- all basically favorable -- on the
relevance of religion to therapy. In many ways, the beginning of this movement
seemed to gain momentum in a debate between Allen Bergin (1980) and Albert
Ellis (1980), published in the Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology.
Not only did this debate highlight the distinct difference in the naturalistic
assumptions underlying Ellis's view, and the theistic assumptions of Bergin's
view, they also coincided with an increased post-modern concern regarding
values and assumptions in science more broadly. This climate of questioning
scientific assumptions has made psychologists more open to the study of
religion and its application to mental health issues.
(...)
Among research psychologists the tensions in
assumptions will, in all likelihood, continue. As neuropsychology,
evolutionary psychology, and other sub-fields continue to advance, the
difference between knowledge gained by scientific and religious means will
remain evident. Psychologists interested in religion may address these gaps by
developing successful theory and research. For example, attachment theory can
be seen in terms compatible with evolutionary psychology. Such research,
however, suggests a field that focuses on psychology more than it does
religion. The distinction between psychology of religion, which
emphasizes how psychology enlightens our understanding of religion, and
religious psychology, emphasizing religious interpretation of
psychology, has been a long-standing issue in the field, and it is an issue
that will not go away soon.
(...)
The above article does not include the method
of theistic psychology in the positive bias approach to science. Clearly this
new approach presents an entirely new course for psychology as a science -- from
nontheistic to theistic, and from the negative bias to the positive bias.
Theistic psychology brings to science new assumptions and conceptual
definitions. Instead of "God" being a "belief system some people have,"
God now becomes a cause-effect concept for real phenomena. The scientific
investigation of God is then not merely the study of someone's attitudes and
beliefs, but of a real phenomenon that participates centrally in every event we
can observe.
Clearly if God is a real entity in the
universe science can investigate God just as it investigates all other real
phenomena.
In order to pursue this kind of investigation
objectively and with a sound methodology the following conditions must hold:
(1) God as an explanatory concept must fit
with other explanatory concepts to form a rational and coherent theory or set of
explanations.
(2) Any scientist or researcher should be able
to contribute to this investigation. No special ability or knowledge should be
required such as mysticism or religious experiences.
(3) There should not be glaring gaps in the
theory so that if God is given an objective definition, then it should also fit
with other objective definitions of concepts that are related to God such as:
-
Sacred Scripture ("the Word of God")
-
the process of revelation
-
life after death
-
heaven and hell
-
communication with those in the afterlife
-
empirical observation of the afterlife and
of heaven and hell
-
mental anatomy or spiritual psychobiology
-
geography of life in eternity
-
etc.
Unlike the psychology of religion, theistic
psychology offers positive solutions to each of these requirements.
1.3.1
Substantive Dualism and Theism in Science
Quoting from
The Struggle Between Christian Theism, Metaphysical
Naturalism And Relativism: How To Proceed In Science? by Jitse M. van der Meer
((Preprint: November 24, 1995)
My thesis is that Christians are mistaken in their belief that material
reality can be understood without reference to non- material created causes,
such as mind, or to non-material uncreated causes, such as God. The reasons I
offer are that Christians know of the existence of non-material beings such as
spirits and God and that ignoring this leads to a distorted view of reality or
even a neglecting of empirical evidence. Broadly conceived, I suggest that
materialism can be excused to be methodological only if it is open to
revision, but that this is seriously hampered by the psychological and
sociological power of beliefs antagonistic to theistic beliefs.
The first set of these beliefs concerns the materiality of the world. Those
deeply committed to the belief that reality is nothing but matter (monistic
materialists) are extremely unlikely to revise their materialism. Those who
accept the existence of a realm in addition to matter (dualists), be it a
mental or a supernatural realm, and also believe that this non-material realm
has no effects in the material world, have a weaker but still very robust
attachment to materialism. For them science is concerned only with matter.
Finally, revision is unlikely among dualists who believe that God and mind
have effects in material reality (interventionists and interactionists,
respectively), but also believe that science ought not to be concerned with
this non- material dimension.
I then argue that those who do believe the non-material is the business of
science still have a hard time limiting materialism, but that this is due to a
second and different set of beliefs. These beliefs do not concern the nature
of reality, but the nature and purpose of explanation. I show that the ideal
of the unity of scientific knowledge forces a preference for explanations in
material terms even when the non-material presents itself as a possibility or
when it is in conflict with empirical evidence.
I then suggest that science needs to expand its methodology beyond the
current confines. This expansion consists of accepting non-material causes in
scientific explanations, and using broader criteria for theory choice. Instead
of explanations that use material causes only, science needs multi-dimensional
explanations that admit the causal efficacy of purpose and intent. Not only is
the pursuit of several different explanations more adequate for a
multi-dimensional reality, but it also provides a way of limiting
one-dimensional explanations including those developed in terms of matter
alone. This is an hermeneutical approach to explanation in the natural
sciences which emphasizes "understanding" and sees explanation in material
terms as one form of it. Criteria for theory choice include not only the
standard consistency with observation, internal consistency, simplicity,
scope, fruitfulness, accuracy, coherence, etc., but also consistency with
conceptual and religious beliefs about the nature of reality and about the
nature and purpose of explanation. This creates the possibility of accounting
for the historic role of beliefs in the construction of knowledge and opens
the possibility of proposing rules for the interaction between religion and
science. To a large extent the nature of these interactions remains to be
explored.
Full article can be accessed here:
www.asa3.org/evolution/vandermeer.html
This is an interesting article from the
perspective of theistic psychology. The author correctly points out that science
ought not to used to enforce the negative bias in science which denies the possibility that
God exists or that a world of eternity exists. This "methodological materialism"
paralyzes scientific thinking, unable to recover from the materialism, unable to
start incorporating additional new paradigms like dualism and theism in science.
The author's proposed solution is to consider positively the ideas in religion
and other areas of traditional "hermeneutical" approaches in the history of
esoteric sciences. This solution is very different from that of theistic
psychology which locates all scientific knowledge of God in Sacred Scripture as
the only valid source. The beliefs of people regarding what Sacred
Scripture says plays no part in the methodology of theistic psychology. The literal meaning of Sacred Scripture is the foundation of all
religion, but the correspondential sense hidden within the literal meaning, is the
foundation of theistic psychology. The literal sense of Sacred Scripture leads
to beliefs called "blind faith" while the correspondential sense extracted from the
literal meaning, leads to rational faith and science (see Section xx).
God has given humanity a a dual source
in Sacred Scripture, one for religion and faith, the other for theistic science.
But note very carefully: if the same channel of Sacred Scripture is used for
both religion and science, as many have proposed, there results an artificial
blend of science and religion that is filled with people's hypotheses and
theories, if not hunches. Much of this may be useless or misleading because
people don't know which is right and which is wrong in this blending of ideas.
But if one leaves the literal meaning to
religion, and enters the hidden scientific sense within, there results a true
science of God and from God (see Section xx).
See also Section 1.8.9 Theistic
Science: The Scientific Alternative to Creationism and Intelligent Design:
www.soc.hawaii.edu/leonj/theistic/ch1.htm#intelligent-design
See also Theism on the Web
compiled by Dr. Ian
Thompson at
http://www.newtheism.com/webtheism.htm
In theistic psychology the following
rational equation is demonstrated (see Section xx):
God
= the Divine Human, who is Divine Good and Divine Truth, in
whom infinite things
are one (see
Section xx).
= Divine Good and Divine Truth proceeding through the
Spiritual Sun in eternity,
as spiritual
heat, which is Divine Good, and as spiritual light, which is
Divine Truth,
and give form to the two worlds out of themselves as eternal uncreate
substances in
an infinite variety (see Section xx).
= Divine Speech, which is Divine Truth proceeding from the
Divine Human,
creating the universe and maintaining it in order
by means of the laws of
correspondences
(see Section xx).
= Divine Speech, as Divine Truth within which is Divine
Good, entering the human
mind by
influx, and activating the mental organs, resulting in the experience
of feeling,
thinking, and sensating (see Section xx).
= Divine Speech descending through the layers of the human
mind, and when it
reaches the
conscious natural mind, it is expressed in a natural language
as Sacred Scripture
(see Section xx).
= Sacred Scripture as the sole source of scientific
knowledge about the laws of
correspondences by which God creates and manages the cause-effect
interactions
for all phenomena in the universe -- but not in the literal
sense of
Sacred Scripture, but in the correspondential sense that is hidden within the
literal
sense, and which must be extracted according to the methods prescribed in
the Writings
Sacred Scripture (see Section xx).
= Heaven in eternity within the human mind, forming the
endless joyful life of an
angel couple
in conjugial love existing in an enchanted paradise, in social
community of
like-minded couples (see Section xx).
As you can see from the above rational
equation (or conceptual formula), God is the beginning of everything.
See the Layers
Diagram. God always existed along with the
infinite uncreate qualities or substances that are in God. These uncreate
substances are of two major types -- substances of good (or spiritual heat)
and substances of truth (or spiritual light). These two uncreate substances
have always existed as part of God in infinite and inexhaustible variety. Good and truth in God,
thus part of God, exist in endless
variety so that everything that exists is created out of these two substances.
If we were able to analyze any object across its discrete micro-layers of
infrastructure, we would
find on the outside of the object, the things of physical matter in
time-space. The next discrete layer we find would be the three Human mental layers in
order -- natural mind, then spiritual mind, then celestial mind. These are called mental
layers because they refer to the mental organs of the human race constructed
out of good and truth. These mental organs are called the affective organ, the
cognitive organ, and the sensorimotor organ. And if you continue still further
into the infrastructure of any object, you will find good and truth, which are
God's Own substances outside of Himself, or Proceeding from Himself into the
created things. Study Questions: Week 9 Readings: Section 1.1.4.3.2 to 1.3.1
-
Student 1: 1, 4, 7
-
Student 2: 2, 5, 8
-
Student 3: 3, 6, 9
9.1.
(a) Explain how Divine Speech descends through the three discrete degrees of
our mind.
(b) How do you react to this knowledge?
(c) How do your friends react to this knowledge?
(d) What is your conclusion?
9.2.
(a) Explain correspondences in relation to Sacred Scripture.
(b) What is your reaction to this new knowledge?
9.3.
(a) Show how correspondences influence the way we think in daily life.
(b) Search the Web for what people know about correspondences and explain what
you found.
9.4.
(a) Many people uncritically repeat the idea that "God is energy." Give a
rational proof that this belief is illogical.
(b) Then compare the logic of the
opposite idea that "God is a Person."
(c) In your opinion, why is there opposition to the view that God is a Person?
9.5.
(a) The highest idea of God is also the most rational. What is this celestial
view of God in relation to the substances of good and truth?
(b) Can you imagine having this view?
9.6.
(a) How does rational consciousness of God differ from sensuous consciousness
of God?
(b) How would you describe your
consciousness of God?
(c) Contrast your consciousness of God with that of a friend
or two. How do they differ, or how are they similar?
9.7.
(a) Explain who is Swedenborg.
(b) Contrast the rational perspective on Swedenborg
with the mystical perspective that some people have.
(c) How do you relate to both
of these perspectives?
9.8.
(a) Google the expression "substantive dualism" (in quotes) and then
the expression "theism and
science" (in quotes). Summarize your assessment of this literature indicating how it relates
to theistic psychology.
9.9.
(a) Discuss the book or movie Matrix in relation to theistic
psychology. See for example:
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Matrix_movie
or
www.imdb.com/title/tt0133093/
Alternately, you can choose the movie What Dreams May Come. See for
example:
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/What_Dreams_May_Come
or
www.imdb.com/title/tt0120889/
If you prefer another choice, email the instructor or discuss it in class.
1.3.2
Discrete Layers of
Substances
Remember this concept:
[any created object = discrete layers of
substances (on the outside, physical, then going inward, mental, which
is constructed out of good and truth, then in its inmost, God the Divine
Human omnipresent] (see Section xx).
If you remember this concept and understand
it rationally, it will greatly help you to understand theistic psychology at a
higher level of rationality.
Practice making a paragraph out of it.
Practice explaining it to your friends. Formulate questions about it and see
if you can find the answers in other Sections. See the tips for how to find
things in the Index Volume 18:
www.soc.hawaii.edu/leonj/theistic/index.htm#Searching_for_something
To understand the concept you need to
understand its sub-components: Discrete
layers = all substances are arranged in discontinuous layers so that
nothing can cross between them. They are forever separated. But they
are functionally locked together by the laws of cause and effect, called the
laws of correspondences (see Section xx). God maintains rational order in
the universe allowing only those phenomena to come into existence that obey
the laws of correspondences. Another way of saying this is that God
creates all things by means of the laws of correspondences (see Section xx).
So the concept of discrete degrees of substances relates to the concept
of correspondences. Outside,
going inward, inmost = the discrete layers of substances out of
which the universe is made are arranged in concentric circles around each
other. These are: natural substances in time-space-matter, human mental
substances of feelings and thoughts, and the uncreate substances of good and
truth in eternity that exist in God the Divine Human. So when we think of God
as omnipresent (see Section xx), it is not logical to think of Him as
present in time-space like our house or our physical body. Omnipresence in
physical space is an illogical concept. Hence it cannot be scientific.
The rational concept of omnipresence is explained in the Writings Sacred
Scripture in the quotes below. Note that "spiritual world" = mental world,
which does not have time and space, but the appearance of time and place --
just like in our dreams:
DLW 69. THE DIVINE, APART FROM SPACE,
FILLS ALL THE SPACES OF THE UNIVERSE
There are two things proper to Nature, SPACE and TIME. It is from these
that man in the natural world forms the ideas of his thought and thence of
his understanding. If he remains in these ideas and does not raise his mind
above them, he can never perceive anything spiritual and Divine, for he
involves them in ideas derived from space and time, and in proportion as he
does this, the light (lumen) of his understanding becomes merely natural.
To think from this in reasoning about spiritual and Divine things is like
thinking from the dense darkness of night about those things which appear
only in the light of day. From this comes Naturalism. But he who knows how
to raise his mind (mens) above ideas of thought derived from space and time,
passes out of dense darkness into light, and discerns spiritual and Divine
things, and at length sees those things which are in them and from them.
And then from that light he disperses the density of natural light,
relegating its fallacies from the middle to the sides. Every man who has
understanding can think above things proper to Nature; and he actually does
so. And then he affirms and sees that the Divine, because it is Omnipresent,
is not in space. He is also able to affirm and to see the things which have
been adduced above. But if he denies Divine Omnipresence and ascribes all
things to Nature, then he does not wish to be raised even although he can
be. (DLW 69)
DLW 71. To make it clear that the merely natural man thinks of spiritual
and Divine things from space, and the spiritual man apart from space, let
the following serve for illustration. The merely natural man thinks by means
of ideas which he has acquired from objects of sight, in all of which there
is figure partaking of length, breadth, and height, and of shape determined
by these, either angular or circular. These [conceptions] are manifestly
present in the ideas of his thought concerning things visible on earth; they
are also in the ideas of his thought concerning those not visible, such as
civil and moral affairs. This he is unconscious of; but they are
nevertheless there, as continuations.
With a spiritual man it is different, especially with an angel of heaven,
whose thought has nothing in common with figure and form that derives
anything from spiritual length, breadth, and height, but only with figure
and form derived from the state of a thing resulting from the state of its
life. Consequently, instead of length of space he thinks of the good of a
thing from good of life; instead of breadth of space, of the truth of a
thing from truth of life; and instead of height, of the degrees of these.
Thus he thinks from the correspondence there is between things spiritual and
things natural. From this correspondence it is that in the Word "length"
signifies the good of a thing, "breadth" the truth of a thing, and "height"
the degrees of these. From this it is evident that an angel of heaven, when
he thinks of the Divine Omnipresence, can by no means think otherwise than
that the Divine, apart from space, fills all things. And that which an angel
thinks is truth, because the light which enlightens his understanding is
Divine Wisdom. (DLW 71)
CL 328. To think spiritually is to think
apart from time and space, whereas to think naturally is to think in
terms of time and space. For to every idea of natural thought there clings
some element derived from time and space, but not to any idea of spiritual
thought. The reason is that the spiritual world does not exist in time and
space, as the natural world does, but it exists in an appearance of these
two. Our thoughts and perceptions differ in this respect as well. Therefore
you can think of God's essence and omnipresence from eternity, that
is to say, of God before the creation of the world, since you think of
God's essence from eternity apart from time and of His omnipresence
apart from space; and in so doing you comprehend matters which transcend the
ideas of a natural person. (CL 328)
To summarize, our thoughts in the natural
mind are formed from experience through the physical body. This insures that
every idea and concept we construct automatically contains subconscious
presuppositions (or assumptions) that involve time, space, shape. This is
obvious when we think about physical objects like a chair or a dog. But it is
less obvious when we think about abstract things like say the immorality of
cheating in business. But you can become aware of the hidden assumptions that
involve time-space as soon as you ask questions about it: What immorality?
Whose immorality? People doing immoral things? Things that some people call
immoral and others not? Or things that are immoral in place but not in
another? etc.
As soon as you answer any of these questions
you will note that time and space are involve, like people doing things in
places. So now when we think of God's omnipresence we tend to think as usual
with assumptions of time and space. This creates obscurity of understanding so
that people often say that this is a mystery, or that this is beyond human
understanding. But actually these statements simply mean that the person
saying them is in total obscurity as to rational understanding of the concept.
This applies to all concepts in theistic psychology. They are seen in
obscurity when the reader is in the negative bias in science, but they can be seen in
rational light when the reader is in the positive bias in science.
So now if you apply the rational concept of discrete layers of substances to
understanding God's omnipresence, you can see that reality is such that
physical objects in time are constructed on a mental infrastructure in
eternity. You could think of it visually as the idea that if you take part any
object you will find a tunnel to eternity where God is. God look out through
all the tunnels and sees the objects. This is just a natural analogy, not a
rational picture, nevertheless the analogy might help you see how God is
omnipresent in all space but apart from space. What is "within" an object that
exists in space is the infrastructure of eternity, which has no space since it
is a mental world (like your dreams). Amazing, isn't? And all these
scientific facts of reality are revealed in the correspondential sense of Sacred
Scripture that is hidden in the literal sense (see Section xx).
Correspondences are cause-effect chains across the discrete layers or degrees
of the mental world of eternity. When a particular celestial operation takes
place in our celestial mind (cause) there is a corresponding reaction (effect)
in our spiritual mind, and this acts as a cause of a corresponding reaction in
our natural mind (effect). So what we are conscious of in our natural mind is
the effect by correspondence of something we are thinking unconsciously in our
spiritual mind, and this in turn is a reaction by correspondence to something
we are thinking in our unconscious celestial mind. Here is how Swedenborg
observed these layers of reactions:
AC 5658. For when a discussion takes place
in a higher heaven about what is good, this reveals itself among those
underneath them in the first or lowest heaven as what is golden; and when a
discussion takes place about what is true this reveals itself there as what
is silvery. Sometimes not only the walls of the rooms where they live are
gleaming with gold and silver but also the very air within them. Also, in
the homes of those angels belonging to the first or lowest heaven who are
moved by good to live among what is good, tables made of gold, lamp stands
made of gold, and many other objects are seen; but in the homes of those who
are moved by truth to live among what is true, similar objects made of
silver are seen. (AC 5658) HH 294. The
nature of the communication of heaven with good spirits, and of hell with
evil spirits, and of the consequent conjunction with man of heaven and hell,
will also be told. All the spirits who are in the world of spirits have
communication with heaven or with hell, the evil spirits with hell, and the
good spirits with heaven. Heaven is distinguished into societies, and so is
hell. Any one spirit belongs to some society, and continues to exist by
influx from it, thus acting as one with it. Consequently, as man is
conjoined with spirits so is he conjoined with heaven or with hell, even
with the society there in which he is in respect of his affection or his
love. For the societies of heaven are all distinguished in accordance with
their affections of good and truth, and the societies of hell in accordance
with their affections of evil and falsity. (Concerning the societies of
heaven see above, n. 41-45; also n. 148-151.) (HH 294)
LETT 1. The Lord, nevertheless, so disposes it, that spirits and men are
seldom brought together so closely as to converse with one another;** for by
communication with spirits men are brought into such a condition as to their
souls, that they are speedily in danger of their life;*** wherefore I would
dissuade all from cherishing such desires. The Lord Himself has been pleased
to introduce me into converse and communication with spirits and angels for
the reasons which have been explained in my writings; wherefore I am
protected by the Lord Himself from the many desperate attempts and attacks
of evil spirits. The way in which spirits and men are kept apart is this;
spirits are kept in spiritual and men in natural thought and speech; whereby
they are separated so as to make one only by correspondences; the nature of
which has likewise been treated of. As long therefore as spirits are in a
spiritual, and men in a natural state, they are not brought together so as
to converse with one another, although they are together in affection; but
when spirits converse with men they are out of their spiritual state, and in
a natural state like men, and then they may bring them into danger of soul
and life, as has been stated above. For this reason they have to be kept
apart, so that the spirits do not know anything of man, nor man of them,
although they are always together; for man cannot live unless he be
associated with spirits, through whom he is connected with heaven and hell,
and thereby receives his life.
["Stockholm, August 11, 1760."]
* Documents Concerning Swedenborg, Vol. 2, pp. 232-233.
** In the original draft the following words are added here: "for this is
more dangerous than men suppose."
*** The following words are added in the original draft: "Unless the Lord
Himself bring them into this condition, and take them under His care, and
protect them specially, as is the case with me."
(LETT 1) SE 159. CONCERNING THE GENERAL
POWER OF SPIRITS COMMUNICATIVE WITH MEN IN GENERAL
This morning it was clearly shown to me how spirits operate upon man, that
is, how God Messiah leads man by means of spirits and angels. I was wide
awake, engaged in thought, in a state which formerly was familiar to me, so
that with a rather vivid imagination I was talking to myself, as it were,
about a certain matter, and I continued in that thought; I was thus almost
in the same state as I had been before, when spirits did not speak with me.
I am in a similar state now as I am writing these things, and also for the
most part when I am conversing with friends in company, as at the table, and
when I am writing letters.
In order that I might learn the way of
that communication of spirits with man - because at times I have had doubts
about it since no sense then perceives the operations of spirits upon
oneself, thus even less those of the angels, and still less of God Messiah
through the angels - therefore, after I had been in that state for some
time, so that I was, as it were, without spirits being around me, that state
was then suddenly changed, and spirits began to address me.
From permission granted by God Messiah,
they began to tell me about the state in which they had been when I was in
that thought in myself, as it were, namely, that they knew no otherwise than
that they were the ones who were then thinking and thus meditating, and
speaking within themselves, as it were; and indeed, so much so, that those
who were nearest believed that it was they who were thinking; those,
however, who were more distant, believed this less, and those who were still
more distant, believed less still, although they also were in such a state
to some extent, but with a difference according to their distance, or what
is the same, according to the affinity of that subject to the spirits. (SE
159)
SE 162. What also seemed amazing to me was that I have gotten to know places
like these, where I even spoke with them, and have been able to speak with
them again as if they were present, although I was a hundred miles away, for
distance amounts to nothing; but this happens only insofar as God the
Messiah grants it.
About this fact I have spoken from time to
time with spirits, and have proven it to them by means of human sight, which
likewise sees objects at a very great distance apart from distance, like the
Sun, Moon, stars. So why should there not be communication with spirits, who
are on a deeper plane than that grosser nature where the sight [of the eye]
is?
So there is communication of even the most
distant angels and spirits with humanity. Their being present with me was a
sensory illusion; for something like a presence results when spirits are
taking part in someone's thought, that is, those spirits who as
intermediates and from closest by are to help carry out the matters which
God the Messiah wills and permits to be done. These [words were written] on
the 24th day of August, 1747 (old calendar). (SE 162)
SE 557. About communication of spirits with mankind
As has been stated and demonstrated [319, 445], when spirits, who are the
souls of those dead as to the body, are present with people on earth and
stand at their back, they believe that they are in every way those people.
And if they were allowed, they could be entirely engaged in the life of the
world through a person who speaks with them, although it could not be done
through others. In fact, this could be done so openly, that through that
person they would be able to communicate their own thoughts by words, even
by letters. For several times, in fact quite often, they controlled my hand
while writing, entirely as if it were their own, so that they believed it
was they themselves who were writing. This is so true, that I can swear to
it. Indeed, if they were permitted, they could write in their own style,
which I know also from a bit of experience; but they are not permitted to do
this. 1748, the 26th day of January. (SE 557)
SE 1085. THAT NOTHING CAN INFLOW FROM EVIL SPIRITS INTO HEAVENLY SOCIETIES
OR INTO HEAVEN; BUT SPIRITS WHEN THEY PERCEIVE THIS FLEE AWAY
I was in a certain heavenly society, although still in the midst of spirits.
During the time I was in that society the communication of the spirits who
had been speaking with me before, and whose operations had been quite
manifestly inflowing, was then perceptibly dulled, so that nothing of theirs
could enter into the sphere in which I was. I manifestly perceived this.
When a spirit wanted to infuse his communicative forces there was a smooth
dullness, as it were. He therefore also lamented, saying, that now he could
do nothing, and at the same time he was indignant. He wanted to flee away.
Thus no communication of evil spirits with any heavenly society is possible;
nevertheless, a like communication is granted by means of spirits of an
intermediate disposition, as often as the Lord so pleases. 1748, Feb. 29.
(SE 1085) SE 1092. CONCERNING THE STATE OF
THE DYING AND OF THOSE WHO ARE BEING RAISED FROM DEATH
This morning I was let into the state of those who are dying, in order that
I might know what their state is when dying, and what follows after death. I
did not indeed die, but still I came into a state of a kind of insensibility
as to the corporeal sense, the interior life remaining entire, so that I
could thence perceive and retain in my memory the things that happen to
those who die. For my respiration was not taken away, and so long as the
respiration remains man sensates, and if his respiration is such as I had,
the man sensates from internals, but not from the objects of the senses, or
from externals. (SE 1092) SE 1093. In order
that the communication [of my spirit with the body] might to some extent be
taken away, my respiration was also tacit, or insensible. (SE 1093)
SE 1094. The heart was first occupied, and as to my heart I seemed to be
conjoined to the celestial, with whom I was at length so united that
scarcely anything of my own was left. This continued for some hours. (SE
1094) SE 1095. The first state of one who
is dying, therefore, is such that I did not hear the spiritual, or those who
were speaking, except in such a way that I was, as it were, removed from
them. Thus there was almost no, or scarcely any, communication with the
spirits who otherwise spoke with me, so that I indeed heard them, but I was,
as it were, without communication with them. Nor did the spirits know
otherwise than that I was dead, and thus removed from the life of the body,
for I heard them speaking. This took place in my case, but the like does not
happen to others who are dying, and who do not talk with spirits as I do.
(SE 1095) SE 1905. Of what nature the
reflection of spirits and angels is, and upon what subjects exercised, it
would be endless to speak, for without reflection there is no life.
1905 1/2. By means of reflections given, spirits saw through me, as they
oftentimes confessed. Whenever it was granted me that they should reflect
upon objects, they confessed that they saw them, as they are seen among men,
but not otherwise than through me. Inasmuch, then, as men do not [generally]
believe themselves to be governed by means of spirits, such a reflection
cannot be given them; wherefore spirits do not see through man, but only
know from his interiors. This was very often made manifest to me, so that
spirits could see each particular object that was in the world, as well as
what was in the imagination and in the thought. While the gate of the mind
is thus open towards heaven, there is given a certain continual reflection,
whence is a communication of spirits with man, and thence they know that
they are not the men with whom they are. (SE 1905 1/2)
SE 4496. CONCERNING A PROFANE FEMALE, [CONCERNING] MAGIC, AND THE MAGICAL
HELLS.
That magical and adulterous one, concerning whom above, who had infested me
with her profanations almost a half year, concerning whom much might be
written - sufficient indeed to fill many pages - at length lost a part of
her communication with spirits, and was conveyed nearly in front beyond the
desert of the robbers, and there rose up near me about my head for some time
a continuous something with a kind of whisper, the effect of her
communication with one side of my head; this she persisted in for a long
time, from an art which she knew in the world and practiced [there].
But she was then conveyed downward to the
first hell of the magicians, which is proximately beyond the desert of the
robbers, not in the depth, but in a certain plane, where are those of both
sexes who practiced magical things in the life of the body. She then, for a
whole night, so tied or interlocked herself with several parts of my face,
as the mouth and so forth, and also of the head [that I was strangely
affected].
On waking up from time to time, I felt
myself bound as to external ideas, and perceived her almost continual
presence there. It was afterwards made known what she had done in the world
[namely], that she had learned magical things from a certain one whom she
had paid [to teach her how] she might be able to allure to adulteries anyone
whom she pleased, and that she had practiced this upon a partner in
adultery, by looking on the right side of his face, and various [other]
parts, and by muttering magical [formulae] to herself. This she had
practiced in her adulteries, and a certain one [of her paramours] confessed
it before a priest - who said that he had often heard such abominable things
from herself - remarking in his confession, that he was astonished at his
burning so suddenly with venereal ardor. This was detected, and being
inspected, she was found to be skilled in fourteen arts of this kind, which
were magical, when yet scarce anyone in the life of the body was aware of
this. (SE 4496) SE 4860. CONCERNING GENII
AND THEIR HELL.
I was let down, with certain spirits, into a certain hell of genii which is
at the back; but it was then granted me to see but little; for it was
dangerous for the sight to be opened, because, in this way, their operations
- which are most hurtful because they are not into the very matter of the
thought, but into the affections thereof - would at once inflow. This it was
granted me to see. There were walls, as of a great building, but without
roof and without windows. In place of windows are great openings. It was
said, there, that they cannot dwell in houses that have roofs and windows,
and that, in case they do, they experience tightness, as if they are being
suffocated. The reason is, because windows signify those things which are of
thought, and roofs its upward limit. (SE 4860)
SE 4861. It was also said, that they dwell in marshes and in most filthy
places; and that they do indeed see each other, but do not speak together.
Those who become genii are such as in the world, spoke but little, but loved
to think, and always ill of the neighbor, and exulted when injury was
suggested to them - especially if they were able to carry it out
clandestinely, and all the while lie concealed. In that life, they love the
like conduct; but, then, the faculty of thinking is taken from them by
degrees - the will, from which they are in the continual attempt to do evil,
remaining similar to what it was in the world. They also do evil, if in no
other way, from a certain kind of interior phantasy. This also, which is
abominable to see, appears when the sight is opened that far. (SE 4861)
SE 4862. Thought is taken away from them, for the reason that if it were
left to them they would communicate with spirits, and thus confusion would
arise; for if thought remained to them, then there could exist communication
with those spirits who think more than they are affected with the desire of
doing; and so they [the genii] would destroy the whole of their reason and
completely annihilate it, and they would also have communication with men,
and would excite their hereditary evils and quite destroy the whole process
of regeneration. They would forthwith pervert the reason, thus all truths
and the idea of every truth whatever, and inspire an affection of the false
instead of one of truth. (Se 4862) SE 5547.
ABOUT HEAVEN IN GENERAL AND ABOUT ITS DEGREE.
There are heavens above heavens, and communication between them. Spirits and
angels do not know how the case is with the communication and conjunction,
except those who are in the highest heaven. There are seven degrees of
these, distinguished, in general, between those who are internal and those
who are external. Those who are internal are called celestial, and those who
are external are called spiritual. The internal are distinguished into
three, and the external into three; and, between the internal ones and the
external ones is given a medium for the sake of conjunction. The ones who
constitute the medium are called celestial-spiritual. Hence it is that there
are seven degrees. (SE 5547) SE 5548. The
first degree, which is the inmost one with the internal, is the Lord's
alone, and may be said to be the very dwelling-place of the Lord* in heaven;
for what is there transacted the angel does not know, but yet he is ruled by
the Lord through it. The second degree with the internal, is one which comes
to their perception indeed, like the internal of man does to that of his
external. The third degree is the one in which these angels live, and where
they have their perception: their human is there, and their soul in the
second degree; just as man thinks in his natural and sensual, and not in the
internal intellectual. Thus those in that heaven possess an external like
all spirits; but it is quiescent with them, and they do not know that they
have it: thus, it is quiescent like a man's external when he is asleep. But,
still, that external is filled with their internals. Through it occurs the
communication with those who are in externals, or in the spiritual world,**
by means of the celestial-spiritual.
* The inmost degree of the human mind is so described in Heaven and Hell,
no. 39. -ED.
** The phrase "spiritual world" seems to be employed here in a sense
altogether unusual, as designating, namely, the "world," or region, in the
other life, which the "spiritual" angels, as distinguished from the
"celestial," inhabit. -ED. (SE 5548)
SE 5549. The angels who are in the spiritual heaven, are not in internals
but in externals. That external also is tripartite, namely, into internal,
middle and external. The external, which approaches towards the external
sensual in the world, is quiescent In the middle degree, they live, as to
thought and observation. The internal is like a soul to them. They indeed
have the internal which is above, but it is shut up. The communication [of
the Lord] with these occurs through the celestial-spiritual heaven, across
the celestial. Hence it is that spiritual angels are in the internal of the
natural. (SE 5549) SE 5550. From these
things it is plain that there are three degrees of heavens, or of angels in
the heavens. The same number of degrees, also, are given with men in the
world who are angels; but, then, they do not know what is transacting in the
internals. After death these are opened. (SE 5550)
SE 5551. These degrees are altogether distinct for each other; but I doubt
whether the learned of the world can take this in, for the reason that, for
the most part, they have the idea, about externals and internals with man,
of continuity from gross to subtle, without any other distinction. (SE 5551)
SE 5552. Man, or the human race, is the ultimate, and what heaven closes in;
for the reason that man has heaven in himself and corresponds to it. His
sensual which stands forth in the world, is the ultimate itself, and
therefore, also, the foundation upon which heaven rests, like a house upon
its foundation - for there is a connection of all things, from firsts to
lasts: also, man's sensual is comparatively fixed. What sort of fixity it
is, can only be known by this, that all things which are on earth, are also
in the heavens, but there they are not fixed; still however, there is the
appearance as of fixity. Many things may be enumerated, as houses, fields,
gardens, carriages, animals. It is hence plain, that, when man lives in the
world, he acquires to himself a plane of fixity, and that this, therefore,
cannot be changed; whence it is that man remains to eternity of the quality
he has been in the world. He has this plane with him, but it is entirely
passive. Still, his interiors close in it. Except he has this correspondence
with internals in him, it cannot be well with him. It is well with him,
also, to the extent to which this correspondence prevails. But he must have
his interiors good: if the interiors are evil then he comes into hell. (SE
5552) AC 3749. A certain spirit came to me
without warning and flowed into my head (spirits can be identified one from
another by whatever parts of the body they flow into). I wondered who he was
and where he came from. But after he had stayed silent for some while the
angels present with me said that he had been chosen from the spirits present
with some learned person still alive in the world today. He - that is, the
learned man - had sought the reputation of possessing more learning than
others. At that point communication through this intermediary spirit with
the thought of that man was also permitted. I asked the spirit what idea
that learned man was able to have about the Grand Man and about its influx,
and therefore about correspondence. He replied that he was able to have
none.
After that I asked what idea did that man
have of heaven. He said, None at all, apart from blasphemous ones, such as
that those in heaven spend their time playing musical instruments like those
on which country people are accustomed to produce a tune. Yet that
individual is held in higher esteem than others and is thought to know what
influx is, what the soul is, and what its interaction with the body is. He
is also probably thought to have greater knowledge than others of what
heaven is. This shows what those are really like who teach others at the
present day; that is to say, using mere stumbling-blocks they oppose the
goods and truths of faith, though publicly they declare something different.
(AC 3749)
1.3.3
The Substances of the
Mental Organs
Remember that when you are thinking of
good and truth, you need to think of them as substances.
Without this rock bottom organic grounding of the mental substances, the mind
vanishes into nothingness. This is exactly
what happens to scientists in the negative bias mode of thinking. To them it
seems that thoughts and feelings, or the mind, don't really exist in the same
rock bottom sense as the electro-chemical activity of the brain's neurons. So
they see the mind and our consciousness as not really real, using the word
"epiphenomenon" and "emergent phenomenon" rather than "phenomenon" to refer to
it. But in the positive bias mode of substantive dualism thoughts and
feelings, or the mind, are organic mental substances that are more real and
more permanent than the physical substances of the brain. The affective organ is constructed out of
the mental substance called Divine Good, which enters the human mind in the
form of spiritual heat from the Spiritual Sun, just as a flower or fruit is
constructed out the physical substance called space-time matter, which enters
the plant in the form of heat from the sun. Note that the plant is made of
matter that comes from the sun, which formed the planets. When the plant
grows, it constructs itself out of the soil and air, which are matter from the
sun, like oxygen, nitrogen, hydrogen, carbon, etc. At the same time, the plant
also receives heat and sunlight, which it takes in and uses for its
operations. These natural phenomena of plant
growth are made to follow these steps by the laws of correspondence which
insure that physical matter will behave like mental substance behaves. So what
we can observe externally with plant growth we can apply directly to mental
growth since the two are in perfect correspondence with each other in every
single detail (see Section xx). So from these correspondences we can know that
the affective organ is constructed out of the substances from the Spiritual
Sun, which we know from Sacred Scripture, is made of Divine good and Divine
truth. At the same time, the affective organ, like the plant, receives new
substances from the Spiritual Sun in the form of spiritual heat, which inflows
in infinite variety. This flow of the substance of good, or spiritual
influx, into the affective organ is continuous and is the cause of our mental
life of feelings, emotions, and motivations.
Thoughts and feelings cannot be made of
nothing, for nothing is nothing, and gives rise to nothing. Neither can our
thoughts and feelings be electricity or chemical exchanges of molecules, for
these things are not thoughts -- they are physical events, not mental events.
Hence we must think rationally or logically of thoughts and feelings as real,
and therefore made of something. Sensations, feelings, and emotions are made
of the mental substance called "Divine good" which flows from the Divine
Human's Mind in infinite variety and enters the receptors that were created by
Him. Every quality of objects and materials, every ability that animals and
humans possess, every natural and rational law, are operations of the Divine
good in the form of spiritual heat that enters each from its inmost discrete
degree. This influx of good into every thing that exists is continuous, and
should this Divine online influx be blocked for an instant, the object would
disappear from existence, just as your television screen instantly shuts off,
when there is a power failure in your neighborhood. From our birth to
immortality in endless eternity, our affective organ grows and survives
because of this influx of good in the form of spiritual heat from the
Spiritual Sun, which is from the Divine Human (see Section xx). The
inflowing substance of good into our affective organ causes our human emotions
and feelings, which make us immortal beings.
Similarly with our other two mental organs. The cognitive organ is constructed
at birth out of spiritual light, which is a mental substance, like spiritual
heat. But the affective organ only receives spiritual heat, while the
cognitive organ only receives spiritual light, which is also called Divine
truth. So the two mental organs specialize as receptors of Divine influx, one
for heat or love, the other for light or truth. The cognitive organ is set
into operation by this influx of spiritual light. This influx causes the
thinking process, which ceases the instant that the spiritual light is blocked
from entering. Our thought sequences are kept in a rational sequence because
of this influx of truth substance. Truth substance is rationality itself from
the Divine Human. His cognitive organ is truth itself, so whatever proceeds
from Him, is Divine Truth. The inflowing substance of truth into our
cognitive organ causes our rational understanding and our human consciousness
and awareness in the here and now.
Similarly with physical objects. They are constructed not of nothing, but out
of the substances of good and truth inflowing from the Divine Human's Mind
through the Spiritual Sun.
It may seem strange to think that a discrete degree within any physical object
is the human mental world! How could this be? We are not aware in our mind
that it is located within the chair we are sitting on, even if we say "located
a discrete degree within." How can our mental world create the physical world
of objects without our awareness? This would remain a strange puzzle were it
not for for the fact that the laws of correspondences have been revealed to
science in the Writings Sacred Scripture (see Section xx). Now we know what
human emotions, feelings, thoughts, and imaginings, create which physical
objects and events (see Section xx). This may not seem so strange if you
remember these two critical things:
The first proposition may be easier to
understand than the second. We are familiar with the first proposition from
the dictionary
definition of God as a Being who is omnipotent, omniscient, and omnipresent (see
Section xx). It is not scientifically rational to say that the universe was
created by God out of nothing, since out of nothing, nothing proceeds. The Old
and New Testament Sacred Scriptures indicate in their literal sense that God
created the world by means of Divine Speech or "the Word." But the literal
sense does not reveal What is Divine Speech or how "the Word" can make things
come into existence. A more rational answer is given in the hidden correspondential sense of Sacred Scripture, which is that "the Word" or Divine Speech is Divine
Truth, and this is a substance, an uncreate eternal substance. And that is the
second proposition above. So now you
need to understand what difference it makes to say that good is a substance,
or truth is a substance. What's a substance?
Quoting from the Writings Sacred Scripture regarding substantive dualism:
LJP 286. [262.] Observations Regarding Leibniz and Wolff
I have spoken with Lord Wolff and Leibniz about simple substance and
preestablished harmony. (LJP 286)
[Note by translator: Gottfried Wilhelm von Leibniz (or Leibnitz),
1646-1716, an influential German philosopher, writer, and mathematician.
According to his Monadology, the universe consists of an infinite number of
"monads" or simple substances, and nothing else. These monads are autonomous
centers of force, indestructible, indivisible, and eternally active. As
every monad contains within it the whole infinity of substance, each is a
living mirror of all existence. Each is, however, limited and different from
all the rest, mirroring the universe in its own way. Monads do not interact,
but are organized to operate synchronously in a "pre-established harmony"
instituted by God before their simultaneous creation. They form a
continuously ascending series from the lowest to the highest. Although
Leibniz sometimes described God as the highest of the monads, he
nevertheless could not avoid the difficulties in reconciling the inclusion
of God in the monadic series with the Christian doctrine of Divine
transcendence. In some places he spoke as though God were outside the series
and the cause of the monads' existence, or as though they proceeded from Him
by what he called "fulgurations."]
[Note by translator: Baron Christian von Wolff (or, less correctly,
Wolf), 1679-1754, an influential German philosopher and mathematician. In an
attempt to systematize the principles of Leibniz, he developed a
comprehensive system of philosophy. Wolff's system gained great popularity
and was substantially that taught in most of the German universities in the
latter half of the 18th century. It also provided the background to the
Critical Philosophy of Immanuel Kant (1724-1804). Wolff wrote a very long
series of treatises covering nearly the whole field of speculative
philosophy.]
LJP 287. [263] Concerning the simple
substance Leibnitz said, that his opinion concerning the monad was never
like that of Wolff concerning the simple substance. He said that he indeed
acknowledged monads as unities but that there were in them simpler and purer
substances by which the monad was formed, from which changes of state
existed therein; since if there were nothing therein, it would be nothing,
in which there cannot be any change of state, for a vacuum admits of no
change. Leibnitz therefore wondered that Wolff held that his monad, which he
calls a simple substance, was created out of nothing, and that when divided
it falls into nothing; and yet he had attributed changes of state to it; and
also that he had called some existences simple substances, and which are in
nature, which anyone can see are aggregations of substances, like the parts
of the air and ether, the elements of metals, and also souls. Wolff said
that he wished by his definitions of his simple substances to captivate the
minds of theologians, who want it to be believed that all things have been
created by God out of nothing, immediately; at that time not knowing that
his followers, by confirming these principles in themselves, would close in
themselves the ways to angelic wisdom, which nevertheless are founded on
natural truths. (LJP 287) LJP 89. [265]
NEWTON. I spoke with Newton concerning a vacuum, and concerning colors.
(LJP 89) LJP 290. [266] Concerning a vacuum
he said, that in the world he had believed in the existence of a vacuum; but
when the angels perceived that he had an idea of a vacuum, as an idea of
nothing, they turned themselves away, saying that they cannot bear the idea
of nothing, since when there is an idea of nothing the idea of the
essence of things perishes. And when the idea of the essence of
things perishes, the idea of thought, understanding, affection, love, and of
will with men and angels perishes, which things are not given in nothing.
They asked him whether he believed that
the Divine, whence is all angelic wisdom, and all intelligence to men in
both worlds, the spiritual and the natural, is a vacuum, and thus that any
Divine operation inflows through a vacuum into their vacuum and can present
itself to perception. At that question he was disturbed. He replied that it
cannot through an absolute vacuum, which is nothing, but through an apparent
vacuum, because the Divine is the Esse itself of wisdom and love with the
angels in heaven and with men in the world, and it fills all things.
Also Esse itself and nothing are so contrary to each other, that if one be
admitted the other cannot. Therefore the angels entreated that he and all
those who cherished the idea of a vacuum as of nothing would desist from it,
that they might be together, knowing that nothing of their life can ever be
given in nothing, but in those things which are, and which are or exist from
the Esse. They added that not anything can be said of a vacuum which is
nothing, which has relation to acting, reacting, receiving, or attracting,
thus to the life of their wisdom and love; in which there are so many
infinite affections with their variations, perceptions, and sensations; for
nothing is nothing, and of nothing we cannot predicate something. When he
had heard these things, Newton said that before this he had desisted from
that idea, and he would desist from it hereafter; knowing that he is now in
the spiritual world, in which, nevertheless, according to his former idea,
would have been his vacuum; and that even now he is a man, and therein he
thinks, feels, acts, yea breathes, and this could not take place in a vacuum
which is nothing, but in something which is, and from Esse exists and
subsists, and that an interstitial nothing is impossible, because that would
be destructive of something, that is of essences and substances which are
something. For something and nothing are altogether opposites, even so that
he was horrified at the idea of nothing, and would beware of it, lest his
mind fall into a swoon.
We want to avoid the unscientific idea that God created the universe out of
nothing. It makes sense rationally to say that God created the universe out of
the infinite mental substances of good and
truth that exist in Himself. This makes logical sense -- as long as you are
still assuming that God is a Person in whom infinite things are one (see
Section xx). Without this assumption, what is being said here about good and
truth makes no sense. So in the positive bias mode you would first assume that
it could be right, and then go on to investigate if you can see that it is
right. So, if you are willing to assume that God is a Person in whom infinite
things are one, you can see how there is no limit to the amount or variety of
good and truth in Himself, and if these things are actual organic substances,
you can also see how God could create a universe outside Himself, even though
there was no such universe, there was nothing. But God can use the mental
substances in Himself to construct human minds outside Himself.
The last sentence is underlined to indicate that you need to study it and
remember it.
This sentence indicates that it's illogical to think that we are God! God must
be before the universe was created, in order to create the universe. It's not
logical to equate God with anything that God created. This is called the
fundamental theistic dualism in theistic science and theistic psychology
(see Section xx). There is a logical necessity to separate what is made and
the maker. The maker cannot be the same as what is made, and vice versa. So
created human beings cannot be God and God cannot be a created human being.
This is a matter of rock bottom logic and rationality in science.
1.3.4 God's Mental Substances as
the Framework of the Universe
So even though all created things are created out of God's Own mental
substances of good and truth, these created things can never be God. Even
though our own mind is created by God's mental substances, we are not God. We
and God are a fundamental rational, logical, scientific, and actual dualism.
But we need to explain further what exactly is the relationship human beings
have with God in this dualism.
By creating things outside of Himself, using mental substances inside of
Himself, God the Divine Human created a reciprocal relationship
between Himself and each member of the human race. This means that He created
human minds in such a way that they are human at the level of immortal self
and personality, but they are not themselves at the level of the
infrastructure of their self and personality. Think of the sequence of
thoughts you must construct in order to solve a problem that comes up in the
course of your day. You are the one constructing the sequence of thoughts in
your own unique way on that occasion. But you are not the one
controlling the sequence and keeping it in a logical order that can lead to
the solution. The sequence is kept in order by the laws of rational thinking,
and these laws are nothing else but the truth substance that inflows as
spiritual light into your rational mind (see Section xx).
It is the same with love, enjoyment, and pleasure. When you experience the
pleasure of your favorite food or drink, that sensation and its mental
repercussions, are yours, and you feel them uniquely. But the infrastructure
of each distinct sensation and pleasure is not yours and is not you. It is
nothing else than the mental substance of good, which is God outside of
Himself.
So this is a new distinction you need to make about God which is described in
the hidden scientific meaning of Sacred Scripture. God is the infrastructure
of every created thing, for without this, the created thing could not exist.
So when you look at a created thing, or consider it in your thinking, there is
the outside discrete level of it, and there is the inside discrete level of
it. The outside level is the thing itself; the inside level is the mental
substance of good which now exists outside God, but is still God.
God's mental substance of good inflows into our affective organ and sets in
motion operations that we experience as feeling, emotion, interest, love,
motivation, etc. -- all having to do with our affective operations (see
Section xx). God's mental substance of truth inflows into our affective organ
and sets in motion operations that we experience as thinking, reflecting,
problem solving, inventing, understanding -- all having to do with our
cognitive operations (see Section xx). The inflowing of the Divine Human's
mental substances of good and truth are infinite in variety and can never be
exhausted in uniqueness to endless eternity.
You can construct things
with a substance. Things must be made of something, and this something is the
substance of good and truth in infinite amounts in the Divine Human's Mind.
Good and truth are mental substances in the Mind of God. Since God is Human, the only
Divine Human, He has mental organs like He created for us to have. We are "in
God's image and likeness" as is revealed in the literal sense of the Old
Testament Sacred Scripture. Our mental body is patterned as
a blueprint model of God's Mental Body, which is the original. God's affective organ is the seat of
His good substance in infinite variety, His love for every human being He
creates and maintains alive to eternity, and His compassion in filling our
experiences with an infinite variety of joyfulness and intelligence. God's cognitive
organ is the seat of His truth substance in infinite variety, His perfect and
omniscient wisdom, and His Human intelligence and inventiveness in infinite
variety. Our life is nothing but the activity of our affective and cognitive
mental organs. This activity is operated by God's own affective and cognitive
organs, almost as if human beings, mentally considered, were little extensions
of God outside of Himself.
So we need to think of God in two ways. God as He is in Himself. And God as He
is outside of Himself. These two are not the same and must be distinguished
rationally and scientifically.
God as He is in Himself always has a Divine Name in various religions
-- Jehovah, Allah, God the Father, Creator of the Universe, Father of
Eternity, and many others. God as He is Outside of Himself is called
God the Son, Incarnated God, Holy Spirit, Divine Providence, Divine
Proceeding, Divine Psychologist, good and truth. The infrastructure of created
things is good and truth (as explained above), or God as He is Outside of
Himself.
There is therefore a close relationship, called a conjunction, between
created things and God as He is Outside of Himself. Human beings are
immortal because of this conjunction process. All our thoughts and feelings,
hence the totality of our self and personality, exists and rests upon a mental
infrastructure that is not ours, but is God as He is Outside of Himself,
in conjunction with our thoughts and feelings. So God is conjoined to our
thoughts and feelings as we grow and become unique selves. Whether you believe
in God or not, whether you are in the negative or positive bias mode, it makes
no difference -- your thoughts and feelings are still conjoined to God's
mental substances as He is Outside of Himself, namely good and truth
streaming out of Himself and into our affective and cognitive organs.
Because of this conjunction process, not a single thought, emotion, or feeling
can ever die. God as He is Outside of Himself in the form of good and
truth substance, is actually the inmost framework of each thought or feeling.
They are immortal because good and truth are immortal, being God's uncreated
mental substances outside of Himself. So now we can consider that out of
this infinite variety of mental substances in His Mind, God can form these
substances into created objects. These created objects are made of the
substances of good and truth. Since the substances of good and truth are
mental substances, you can see how the universe is created out of mental
substances which God has in infinite variety. Next you need to understand how
mental substances in eternity can become physical matter in time-space.
So now you can see that God is present in our mind in two ways. One way God is
present in our mind is unconscious to us, which is the infrastructure of each
thought and each feeling we experience from birth to eternity. This has just
been discussed above. And it was said that God is present in this way with
every human being regardless of their conscious idea or belief about God.
But God can also be present in our mind in a way that is conscious to us!
The unconscious presence of God in the infrastructure of our mind makes our
thoughts and feelings immortal, as explained above. The conscious presence
of God in our mind makes our thoughts and feelings heavenly.
Heaven is an organ of life where God is present consciously.
So it clearly is beneficial to the
individual to acquire the skill of being consciously in the presence of God.
Prior to being consciously in the presence of the Divine Psychologist, we are
continuously in transition between heaven and hell. You can confirm this
empirically by monitoring your thoughts and feelings over the course of a day
or a week (see Section xx). If you keep track of your thoughts while you are
being challenged, you will quickly become aware of the hellish thoughts and
feelings into which your experience is immersed. Next time you drive, for
instance, monitor your thoughts about other drivers and pedestrians (see
Section xx). Or when you find out you didn't pass an exam, or didn't get a
job, or your partner left you, you get sick, depressed, or you are kidnapped
by terrorists, etc. You may spend a few hours at work and feel like you are in
a mental hell, then you get home, relax, ingest, hug and kiss, and you feel
like you're back in heaven.
This up and down pattern is hard on our
mind. It spoils the good times with the bad. Wouldn't we want to be in our
heaven all the time! Well, this is possible. While you maintain yourself in
the presence of the Divine Psychologist, you are in heaven. You cannot fall
out of heaven unless you all of a sudden forget His presence. Then you are
acting in a delusional reality, as if God did not matter in the things you are
doing, in the things you are trying to get. This delusional reality kicks you
into the up and down mode, just described.
Theistic psychology is called the "science of immortality" because it provides
the scientific knowledge of acquiring the skill of staying in the conscious
presence of the Divine Psychologist. As long as you consciously stay in His
presence, which is solely up to you, He keeps you in your heaven, no matter
what happens on the outside around you. The same thing no longer stress you
out, the same things no longer have the power to disturb you. Instead of
thinking negative, you now think positive. Instead of resentment, you have
compassion. Instead of weakness in motivation and enthusiasm for some required
work, you now have initiative and endurance. As a general explanation of this
amazing phenomenon, we can say that God's mental substances of good and truth
can give us these mental powers if we are willing to receive them in our
conscious thoughts and feelings. For example,
we feel like retaliating against a friend who failed to do something promised.
We think bad thoughts about that person. These thoughts exclude you from the
presence of the Divine Psychologist. You fall into the hellish mode of
thinking and emoting and behaving. You experience hell. You are frustrated,
enraged, and you hate yourself as well. You hate the way you feel. You want to
change your mental state. You can! Change your thoughts in such a way that
heavenly feelings can enter into them. This means thinking truth which comes
from Sacred Scripture. The truths you have acquired from Sacred Scripture are
the thoughts in which the Divine Psychologist is present with you. Make thse
thoughts conscious and voluntary, and you are now in heaven again. You never
have to leave. It's up to you. So you can see
that the most important task we have while we live in the physical body in
time-space, is to learn the skill of remaining always in the presence of the
Divine Psychologist. Swedenborg interviewed many couples who dwell in the
eternity of their heaven. They said they are continuously in the presence of
the Divine Human, whom they can see in front of their eyes no matter which way
they seem to face outwardly. Of course, this outward visual appearance of God
is an appearance. God real and actual presence with them is on the inside,
inside their thoughts and feelings, which are solely heavenly. They told
Swedenborg that if for a they begin to have thoughts of their own former
nature which is not heavenly, they instantly find themselves projected out of
their heaven, and soon into their hell.
1.3.5 Benefits of Understanding
Theistic Psychology
The benefits are discussed in detail in
Section 1.1.4.2 where they are categorized in three types as Enlightenment,
Empowerment, Ecstasy. Here we rephrase some those benefits in terms of
specific skills in our daily activities. (i)
Relief from existential anxiety. It is known that people are afraid to die.
This is a natural reaction of the sensuous-natural mind (see Section xx). When
you understand rationally how it is the case that you are actually immortal,
this natural anxiety is reduced, and eventually completely eliminated.
(ii) Seeing every event in our lives as
motivated towards a rational and good end or purpose. Nothing can happen to us
blindly or by fate. The Divine Psychologist only allows those events to occur
which He can use to our spiritual benefit in eternity (see Section xx). This
rational knowledge liberates us from worrying or feeling bad about many events
in our daily life like not winning at something, or losing something, or being
criticized, or not achieving our goal. These negative events lose the power of
negativity if we rationally understand that they are building our future in
eternity. (iii) Being able to distinguish
true from false regarding the explanations and concepts people propose. There
are so many books, so many new age gurus, so many experts in spirituality or
lifestyle. You can be forever involved in circles pursuing these accounts.
People typically go from theory to theory, proposal to proposal, author to
author, being persuaded blindly, not being able to use rationality to test the
various proposals. So one becomes a victim of all these ideas and false
representations of reality. But knowledge of theistic psychology gives you a
global, comprehensive, and integrated account, following rational concepts,
ideas, and reasoning, delivered to us directly as God's Divine Speech (see
Section xx). This allows you to recognize immediately the non-rational
components of accounts and explanations you read about God, religion, science,
philosophy, and immortality or the life after death.
(iv) Being able to understand Sacred Scripture in both modes -- (a) literal
meaning for one's religion and for our rational understanding of religions in
general; and (b) spiritual meaning hidden within the literal for one's
theistic science and psychology. Many people walk away from Sacred Scripture
because they do not agree with parts of it that seem illogical, outdated,
strange, perverted, culture bound, and showing racial and gender bias (see
Section xx). All these problems are overcome completely and disappear when we
leave the literal sense, and enter the hidden correspondential sense that lies within
it. Every topic in this meaning is universally applicable scientific knowledge
about God, mental anatomy, and the afterlife in eternity (see Section xx). The
hidden scientific sense never contradicts the literal sense, but amplifies it
and elevates it to a higher level of understanding of the actual content of
Divine Speech, which is Divine Truth, and hence, pure rationality itself.
(v) Being able to prepare effectively for our life of immortality in eternity.
Although the literal sense of Sacred Scripture is a necessary start in our
daily lifelong efforts at character reformation, this required physiological
process of self-modification and regeneration, is made more effective
through the rational concepts of theistic psychology. These explain to us in
detail what are the consequences of doing this or that in our mind. We have a
rational understanding of mental anatomy, of how heaven and hell are in our
mental organs, and how our moment by moment actions are tied to the vertical
community of people in eternity (see Section xx).
(vi) Being able to effectively shape a professional self out of our
personality. God wants us to be maximally competent at what we choose to do.
The Divine Psychologist is right there, in your conscious mind, and making all
the wheels turn the right way. By talking in our mind to the Divine
Psychologist all day long we are learning to acknowledge His presence in our
consciousness. When we make this acknowledgement, and keep it active all day
long (or most of it), then the Divine Psychologist empowers us to raise
ourselves to the level of professional self. Every task we accomplish, every
reasoning process, every feeling and emotion, every motive and intention, are
now changed by the Divine Psychologist so that we may achieve greater
competence in each physical and mental activity.
(vii) Being able to help others more effectively and lead a more useful life
of service to people and country. When others are confused, our theistic
psychology knowledge can help because we have a more rational perspective on
what's happening to them.
(viii) Being able to build a unity marriage
(see Section xx). Many marriages remain in an external level, both partners
retaining independence of thinking and feeling. But knowing the principles of
conjugial love revealed in Sacred Scripture (see Section xx), allows us to
enter into the inner marriage by learning to align our thoughts and feelings
into a reciprocal mode that conjoins wife and husband into "one angel" (see
Section xx). The unity model is unique to theistic psychology as it is based
on Divine Speech and applying universally to every human being from birth to
eternity. (ix) see if you can add to this
list from your own experience of studying theistic psychology.
1.4 Partial List of
Scientific Revelations in the Writings of Swedenborg
The following list encompasses many of the topics of theistic psychology.
You can read them as a summary of what's to come in the rest of this book.
(1) cosmology or the origin of the universe
through the "two suns" and their intervening atmospheres, and the methods of
its current maintenance by the Laws of Divine Providence and Permissions. Also: the character of evolution of civilizations on planets, such as
the fact that our planet is the only one to have a mechanized or
industrialized society.
(2) medical science including the
characteristic functions and origins of some viruses not yet identified in his
lifetime.
(3) the nature of psycho-somatic
operations, such as the observation that "anxieties about the future affect
the stomach more than the rest of the viscera"
(4) the anatomy of brain structures too
small to identify with the microscope
(5) the lack of sensation and thought in
the fetus
(6) anthropology and archeology, including many
unknown facts about ancient peoples, sacred scriptures, culture, religion,
lifespan, death rituals, symbols, hieroglyphics, science of correspondences,
the nature of unconscious motivation in human affairs, and still others
(7) psychology and neurophysiology, especially the detailed working of the
mind--body interaction, including the unobservable elements and components of
brain cells, their respiration, and their initiation of activity through the
will and the understanding. Also, the relation between the cerebellum and the
affective domain, on the one hand, and on the other, the relation between the
cerebral cortex and the cognitive domain. Also the identification of the right
brain as dealing with love and affections, and the left brain as dealing with
digital information or "cognitions." Also included, are many
psychological revelations about relationships, marriage, and life's
developmental phases, including language, thought, memory, and reasoning.
(8) physics and chemistry, such as the
impossibility of a vacuum or the description of the inner structure of objects
in terms of three degrees of discontinuity analogous to the universal law that
applies without exception to every single phenomenon, object, process, or
functional quality:
(9) the shape of the spiritual world or
mind is not spherical but humanoid, as visually witnessed by Swedenborg when
he was taken to an "outside position" to view it, as if from a great
distance.
(10) the universe contains two suns, with the
Sun of the spiritual world forming and generating all the suns or stars in the natural world
on a continuous basis so that the physical universe constantly expands; further, after generating
the physical suns, the spiritual Sun remains "within" them
on the basis of simultaneous degree, and from that underlying causative
position, acts on them from "within," and brings about lawful development and
evolution.
(11) events in the natural universe are totally
constricted within limits imposed by events in the spiritual world, the latter
being "within" the former as cause is "within" effect in simultaneous degrees
of existence;
(12) randomness (or chance) and evolutionary
patterns such as selection and adaptation, are in reality non-random but
totally determined by Divine-Human purposes involving love, good, value,
wisdom, morality, truth, justice, usefulness. From these come also their
opposites when they are received in the human mind and deliberately corrupted
by free choice. For
instance, the variety and evolution of animal forms parallel and are
constrained by the variety and hierarchical structures of human affections,
emotions, and sentiments. Every species and genus, every homological
structure, every biochemical process is constrained by, and parallels exactly,
the taxonomy of the human mind-- its affections, thoughts, and sensations
built up into subjective agencies called "selves," living within cultures through personality and society. Nature
is a theater of the spiritual: Swedenborg gives this principle a scientific
basis.
(13) the evolution or developmental
phases of Divine revelations over history, or the history of religious
"churches" from the earliest generations on this earth.
(14) the spiritual meaning of the Bible
and the method of correspondences by which this meaning can be extracted,
formed into Doctrine that then serves as the basis of one's regeneration (or
preparation for heavenly life).
(15) the nature of one's life in heaven
or eternity, and in hell, revealed in great detail through his journeys and
conversations in the spiritual world.
(16) the methods of regeneration we must follow in order to prepare for heavenly
life, how we must live our daily lives in orderly obedience to God through
religion and conscience. Thus we choose heavenly or hellish life
in eternity by our cumulative choices which form our permanent inner character
as an immortal "spirit". People who have a good character enter
heaven regardless of their religion or belief system.
(17) the human
mind has three rational regions (natural, spiritual, and celestial), and their
sub-regions. For detailed discussion on this, consult my book Moses, Paul,
and Swedenborg: The Three Phases of Religious Behavior, available on the
Web at:
www.soc.hawaii.edu/leonj/leonj/leonpsy/instructor/gloss/moses.html
(18) every individual's mind functions in conjunction with
numerous other individuals through a chain of unconscious interconnections
with other individuals, from those whose state of consciousness is in the
highest regions of the human mind (“Third Heaven"), to those who are
in the lowest state ("hell"). I call these unconscious
interconnections the "vertical community"
to distinguish it from the
horizontal community of our neighborhood or country on earth.
(19) every
planet is created for carrying human life and numerous planets are now
inhabited and new ones are constantly being created--all in a grand Divine
plan to create immortal human beings that live in eternal bliss in the
heavenly regions of the mind.
(20) animals are
not immortal and their soul dissipates back into the spiritual world. Only
human beings can be immortal because they are created with an upper region in
the mind called rational, while animals are not so created. Thus we have freedom of the will in
accordance with our understanding, and it is this freedom of decision making
that forms the organic spiritual body that can be immortal. Only rational
thinking operations can receive continuous spiritual influx without which we
cannot be immortal. Nevertheless, the spiritual world--or higher regions of
the mind, are filled with animals of all sorts, with greater variety and
beauty than what exists on earths. Swedenborg has seen them thousands of
times. But these are not animals born on earth who passed on to the higher
regions. These are spiritually created animals and they have spiritual
characteristics.
(21) there
is no vacuum. Space is not empty. We can call it ether, or dark matter, or
fields, etc., but not empty nothing--an irrational concept. Here's what
Newton
had to say about his idea of vacuum when Swedenborg addressed him in the
spiritual world.
Quoting from
Swedenborg's Writings
NEWTON. I spoke with Newton concerning a vacuum, and concerning
colors. (LJP 289)
Concerning a vacuum he said, that in the world he had believed in the
existence of a vacuum; but when the angels perceived that he had an idea
of a vacuum, as an idea of nothing, they turned themselves away, saying
that they cannot bear the idea of nothing, since when there is an idea of
nothing the idea of the essence of things perishes. And when the idea of
the essence of things perishes, the idea of thought, understanding,
affection, love, and of will with men and angels perishes, which things
are not given in nothing. They asked him whether he believed that the
Divine, whence is all angelic wisdom, and all intelligence to men in both
worlds, the spiritual and the natural, is a vacuum, and thus that any
Divine operation inflows through a vacuum into their vacuum and can
present itself to perception. At that question he was disturbed.
He replied
that it cannot through an absolute vacuum, which is nothing, but through
an apparent vacuum, because the Divine is the Esse itself of wisdom and
love with the angels in heaven and with men in the world, and it fills all
things. Also Esse itself and nothing are so contrary to each other, that
if one be admitted the other cannot. Therefore the angels entreated that
he and all those who cherished the idea of a vacuum as of nothing would
desist from it, that they might be together, knowing that nothing of their
life can ever be given in nothing, but in those things which are, and
which are or exist from the Esse.
They added
that not anything can be said of a vacuum which is nothing, which has
relation to acting, reacting, receiving, or attracting, thus to the life
of their wisdom and love; in which there are so many infinite affections
with their variations, perceptions, and sensations; for nothing is
nothing, and of nothing we cannot predicate something.
When he
had heard these things, Newton said that before this he had desisted from
that idea, and he would desist from it hereafter; knowing that he is now
in the spiritual world, in which, nevertheless, according to his former
idea, would have been his vacuum; and that even now he is a man, and
therein he thinks, feels, acts, yea breathes, and this could not take
place in a vacuum which is nothing, but in something which is, and from
Esse exists and subsists, and that an interstitial nothing is impossible,
because that would be destructive of something, that is of essences and
substances which are something. For something and nothing are altogether
opposites, even so that he was horrified at the idea of nothing, and would
beware of it, lest his mind fall into a swoon. (LJP 290)
What is space
made of? Not of nothing. Scientists today are beginning to use the word
"ether" again, which was in use in Swedenborg's time (18th century). Ether
would thus be a thinner layer of matter than particles, waves, and energy
fields. Thinner than energy fields? Yes, why not? Swedenborg refers to the
thinnest materials of the natural world that are formed between the body and
the mind as a mediating construction, partly material, partly spiritual, thus having a dual
existence. The mind is built up of spiritual substances from the spiritual
Sun, but also from these thinnest natural substances that contain sensorimotor
information from experience. This thin layer of matter that encloses the
natural mind is called "the limbus" (Latin for border). Theistic
psychology research
needs to investigate the nature of the limbus and whether the fabric of space
is stretched out on a similar limbus that allows the two worlds to communicate
through the functional laws of correspondence.
(22) we are the
only industrialized society of all the planets that Swedenborg was allowed to
perceive through the minds of the local inhabitants, and it is explained why
this will remain so.
(23) the
universe is maintained and created larger and larger continuously, through the operation
of two suns--the Sun of the spiritual world and the suns (or stars) of the natural world.
Spiritual substances called goods and truths stream out of the Sun of the
spiritual world, forming the upper regions of the human mind and habitations,
while physical substances stream out of the suns of the physical world,
forming the lower regions of the human mind and all the physical matter of
which the natural mind and the physical body are made of. These two suns act
in concert through the laws of correspondences.
(24) when we
become inhabitants of the upper regions of the mind (called the Heavens) we
live forever, we live as married couples (called the Conjugial Love unit), we live in a society, we operate spiritually in both
spiritual body and mind, and this is totally different from how the physical body and
mind operate.
(25) the action
of a virus on the physical body acts in correspondence with the function and
characteristics of spiritual regions of the mind. The virus cannot act without
this spiritual correspondence simultaneously going on. The spiritual
correspondences are determined by particular societies in the vertical
community to which we are associated as individuals. The mental
characteristics of these spiritual associates (all of whom were people on earth
until they passed on), determines the biochemical actions of the virus. Thus,
knowing the characteristics of the associates allows us to know the viral
characteristics. For a detailed description of this methodology and its
implications for both theistic and materialistic science, consult this unique
work The Third Source, on the Web at.
www.theisticscience.org/blomdahl/Sweden.htm
(26) life after
death begins approximately 30 hours after the death of the physical body.
Resuscitation is described in detail in Swedenborg's Arcana Coelestia
(12 volumes). (See Section 1.7)
(27) in all
plant reproduction the materialistic appearance is that the male plant
component fertilizes the female plant component. But this appearance must be
contextualized in its actual operation, which is, that in the bringing forth
of plants (growth), the earth is the mother (female) component to all plants,
while the seed is the male component. I understand this to mean that all
plants (what we call male and female) are to be considered male while the
growing matter, soil, or minerals are to be considered as part of earth, it
being the female womb that brings the plant forth through the action of the
male seed. This action is through the genes or inmost component of the seed,
and this is male. Also: seed=truth, but there are many truths--natural,
spiritual, celestial.
(28) children
inherit the parents' character traits as a character tendency which becomes their own
unless they undergo regeneration or character rebuilding (reformation). Those who do not undergo regeneration remain
inhabitants of the lower regions of the mind, in this world, and they continue
this state of mind in the afterlife to eternity. While we're still in the
physical body, inhabiting the lower regions of the mind appears normal, and
only once in a while delusional or insane. But once the physical body is
separated, the resuscitated rational ether body
(or mind) which now forms our external sensorimotor self, can no longer maintain the
appearance of being normal and quickly explodes into delusion , insanity, and
gross insanity such as characterizes the lowest regions of the mind called
animal, beastly, and hellish.
(29) regeneration is a necessary operation to recover from our inherited and
injured character. This recovery operation proceeds in two steps repeatedly
performed on a daily basis for many years. The first step is called
reformation and starts the moment we feel remorse about some character trait
that comes to our attention through self-examination of our acts and thoughts.
The second step is to make a conscious decision to avoid that behavior or
thought because it is injurious to the upper regions of our mind. If this
process of reformation and regeneration is avoided or neglected, the inherited
character remains, is passed on as a tendency to our children, and in the
afterlife, takes us down to the lowest regions of the mind where we endure a
miserable existence. This hellish existence in eternity is not a punishment
for misdeeds, for this would be cruel and unreasonable punishment, irrational,
contrary to God's Personal Character and order. Instead, they who pass on
without regenerating their injured character, insist on being what they are,
namely, wild hateful cunning beasts in human form striving to injure and
torture anyone they can overpower. For such is our inherited character and
this is why it must be regenerated. Here in the natural world, external laws of
society and their enforcement, prevent us from breaking out into uncivilized
barbaric acts--most of the time, though not always. But in the other life we
cannot fake it. People in that dangerous state of mind must therefore be
segregated in mental regions called "hells" where they live in company with
others who share similar wild emotions and enjoyments.
(30) character
is our spiritual body and is formed of spiritual substances that are immortal
and permanently part of our self. We are kept in spiritual freedom
continuously. This is effected by being associated with spiritual societies on
both sides of a decision-making process (our "vertical community"). Every time we make a decision, a
permanent immortal
substantive engram is formed in the spiritual body or the organ of the "character"
in the mind. This physiological record is
indelible, though it can be covered up and moved to the side during the
regeneration process. The nature of the spiritual engram encompasses a variety of good
tendencies and a variety of evil tendencies. Many of these decisions are tiny and automatic, like where we
move our eyes and what pleasure or interest we derive from such investigation
or information processing. Each eye movement is a response to some inherited
love or interest and leaves a permanent record as an indelible engram in the
immortal mind. Small or large, every one of these counts, cumulates, and
remains
permanent. While these cumulations hardly show in this life, in the spiritual body the
character assumes total control--nothing can stop it for it is in total
freedom to choose and express. If this character is anti-social and
irrational, the individual is unable to withhold the self from injuring others.
They must then be restrained and kept segregated in the lower regions of their
mind called the hells.
(31) the
structural mechanics of the physical universe is formed according to the human
character. Every atom or particle has a form traceable to the human character.
This is true of minerals, plants, and animals, that is, all geology and
biology, hence all their derivatives. The shape of the human character when
well formed is that of an angelic person, but when injured, it has the shape
of a monster or devil. The entire spiritual universe is in the shape of the human form.
The entire human race, past and present, on all the inhabited planets, and as
it continuously grows in size, is integrated in God's Perception as one human
and one monster.
(32) the upper
regions of the mind are marked for the unity between one husband and
a wife. However, there are variations to be taken into account. A man's
character is constructed on a reciprocal basis to a woman's character so that
the two may become one united person in the uppermost regions of the human
mind. For this unity to be effected to its full potential perfection, it is necessary
that not a single component of the man's character be like any component of
the woman's character.
A general article discussing the
scientific revelations in Swedenborg may be found at this address: www.soc.hawaii.edu/leonj/leonj/leonpsy/instructor/gloss/theistic.html
Quoting from the Swedenborg Foundation:
Besides "the Writings of Swedenborg"
which contain the scientific revelations about the spiritual world,
Swedenborg (1688-1772) also made various contributions and inventions to
natural science. He was a state employed engineer and a member of the
Swedish legislative parliament. A partial list of his inventions includes:
-
A Glider-Aircraft
-
An Archimedean Glass
-
A Water Pump
-
An Ear Trumpet
-
An Airtight Stove
-
The Wave Motion of Light
-
The Molecular Basis of Magnetism
-
The Relationship between Magnetism and Electricity
-
The Nebular Hypothesis
-
The Function of the Endocrine Glands
-
Functions of the Cerebellum
-
Centers of Thinking and Memory in the Cerebral
Cortex
-
Formation of Cerebro-Spinal Fluid
-
Integrative Action of the Nervous System
www.newchurch.org/Swedenborg/inventions.html
Quoting from Swedenborg:
From my fourth to my tenth year, I was constantly engaged in thought upon
God, salvation, and the spiritual sufferings of men, and several times I
revealed that at which my father and mother wondered.... From my sixth to my
twelfth year my delight was to discourse with clergymen concerning Faith --
that the life thereof is love, and the love that gives life is the love of
one's neighbor. (Swedenborg: Letters 1769)
1.5
Some of the People Who Have Acknowledged Swedenborg
I present this list to demonstrate that Swedenborg, though unknown in science,
is quite well known in the history of literature. But I should indicate that these
"endorsements" and opinions do not contribute to establishing the scientific
status of Swedenborg's Writings. Theistic psychology has quite a different
approach to Swedenborg than these non-scientific opinions.
"The most remarkable step in the religious history of
recent ages is that made by the genius of Swedenborg." Ralph Waldo Emerson
"I admire Swedenborg as a great scientist and a great
mystic at the same time. His life and work have always been of great interest to
me." Carl Jung, Psychologist
"For you Westerners, it is Swedenborg who is your Buddha,
it is he who should be read and followed!" D. T. Suzuki, Zen Buddhist
Scholar
"The correlations between what Swedenborg writes of some
of his spiritual experiences and what those who have come back from close calls
with death report is amazing." Raymond Moody, author of Life After Life
"People who have had near-death experiences peek through
the door of the after-life, but Swedenborg explored the whole house." Kenneth
Ring, founder of International Association for Near Death Studies (I.A.N.D.S.)
"Let me explain why Swedenborg merits scrutiny. It is a
fact that the greatest poets and prose writers have borrowed liberally from him.
The list is long: first Blake, as his direct spiritual descendant; then Goethe,
a fervent reader of Swedenborg (as was Kant followed by Edgar Allan Poe,
Baudelaire, Balzac, Mickiewicz, Slowacki, Emerson, Dostoevsky...." Czeslaw
Milosz, 1980 Nobel Prize, Literature
"Swedenborg's enormous work has been my companion
throughout my entire life." Henry Corbin, Islamic Scholar
"Swedenborg's message has meant so much to me! It has
given color and reality and unity to my thought of the life to come; it has
exalted my ideas of love, truth, and usefulness; it has been my strongest
incitement to overcome limitations." Helen Keller
"I have come back to Swedenborg after vast studies of all
religions... Swedenborg undoubtedly epitomizes all the religions - or rather the
one religion - of humanity." Honore de Balzac
"More truths are confessed in Swedenborg's writings than
in those of any other man... One of the loftiest minds in the realm of mind...
One of the spiritual suns that will shine brighter as the years go on."
Thomas Carlyle, Theologian
"Swedenborg was one of the world's greatest geniuses. With
his rare intellect and deep spiritual insight he has much to contribute to our
modern life." Norman Vincent Peale
"To my mind, the only light that has been cast on the
other life is found in Swedenborg's philosophy. It explains much that was
incomprehensible." Elizabeth Barrett Browning
Other artists, writers, thinkers and leaders influenced by
Swedenborg include:
|
William Blake
Jorge Luis Borges
Robert Browning
John "Johnny Appleseed" Chapman
Samuel Taylor Coleridge
John Flaxman
Benjamin Franklin
Robert Frost
Northrop Frye
Victor Hugo |
George Innes
,
Henry James, Sr.,
George Macdonald
Ezra Pound
Howard Pyle
Georges Sand
August Strindberg
Henry David Thoreau
George Washington
William Butler Yeats
Bill Wilson (co-founder of Alcoholics Anonymous)
and others. |
|
©2001 Information Swedenborg
Inc. All Rights Reserved. Original here:
www.swedenborg.ca/swedenborg/influence.html |
Helen Keller

Quoting from:
web.archive.org/web/20011215231651/www.swedenborg.net/arcana2000/newstuff/keller/keller.html
The Secret of Helen's Strength ----------
It is a remarkable fact that in this most remarkable of lives, little is
known of the source of Helen's steadfast strength--her religion. Amid all the
excitement and sensationalism surrounding the Helen Keller story, it is
important to remember that she was neither a saint nor a savage, but simply
one of us--frail and human, subject to fits of temper, moods of
discouragement, and times of despair. Therefore, like all of us, Helen needed
to rely on something deeper than sheer human will power. She needed a
religion. She wrote:
No one knows--no one can know--the bitter denials of limitation better than
I do. I am not deceived about my situation. It is not true that I am never sad
or rebellious. But long ago I determined not to complain. The mortally wounded
must strive to live out their days cheerfully for the sake of others. That is
what religion is for--to keep the heart brave to fight it out to the end with
a smiling face. This may not be a very lofty ambition. But it is a far cry
from surrendering to fate. But to get the better of fate, even to this extent,
one must have work and the solace of friendship, and an unwavering faith in
God's Plan of Good.
Helen's religious sense was dependent upon a clear understanding of the
afterlife, a world that would be happier and more beautiful than anything she
could imagine on earth. She believed that her life in the spiritual world
would be free of bodily limitations. She saw it as a place where she would be
able to fulfill all the desires of her heart. Writing in a mood of sadness,
she reveals the aching loneliness that she sometimes felt:
What earthly consolation is there for one like me, whom fate has denied a
husband and the joy of motherhood? At the moment my loneliness seems a void
that will always be immense.
But in the next breath she rises above her sorrow and writes:
Fortunately I have much work to do--more than ever before, in fact--and
while doing it I shall have confidence as always that my unfulfilled longings
will be gloriously satisfied in a world where eyes never grow dim nor ears
dull.
The vision of a glorious afterlife was uppermost in Helen's mind, even
while she strove with all her heart and soul to be a creator of good, a helper
of her kind while on earth. This vision sustained her through times of
despair, filled her with hope during times of sorrow, and lifted her above
what sometimes seemed to be insurmountable obstacles. She had placed her trust
in a seer named Emanuel Swedenborg whose vision of the other world had given
her life a spiritual focus. "We who are blind," she wrote, "are often glad
that another's eye finds a road for us in a wide, perplexing darkness. How
much more should we rejoice when a man of vision discovers a way to the
radiant outer-lands of the spirit." To her, Swedenborg's testimony about the
life to come was like "a sweet breath from God's presence." She referred to
his voluminous writings as the Great Message, and declared that the promise it
contained gave her the strength to overcome her limitations. She wrote:
Swedenborg's message has meant so much to me! It has given color and
reality and unity to my thought of the life to come; it has exalted my ideas
of love, truth, and usefulness; it has been my strongest incitement to
overcome limitations.
Clearly, Swedenborg's message was the secret behind Helen's strength. It
was as if a gentle hand had reached out to guide her through the perplexing
world of spirituality, given her a tour of heaven, and introduced her to the
God of Love--the same God she already worshipped in her heart of hearts.
Swedenborg, Helen's guide in the realm of spirit, was able to explain to her,
in comforting tones, the reality of God's promises, and the immanence of His
presence.
And yet, this secret--the power of Emanuel Swedenborg's teachings in her
life--is almost never mentioned when the Helen Keller story is told. Most
often, the emphasis is upon the deep bond that she had with her teacher Anne
Sullivan, or the experience at the well where she learned the meaning of the
word "water." Seldom, however, is any reference made to the secret of Helen
Keller's strength--her religion. "I cannot imagine myself without a religion,"
she said. "I could as easily fancy a living body without a heart."
------------------------------------------------------- "My Religion"
---------------------------
In 1927, at the age of 47, she wrote a book that she called, very simply,
My Religion. In it she opens her heart and her mind to tell of the living
faith that enabled her to rise above life's crushing adversity and still find
joy in useful service. In reading her words, we are encouraged to go and do
likewise--to rise above our own limitations, to discover that the light still
shines in the darkness, and that, whatever sorrows have crossed our path, our
lives still have meaning and purpose.
She was always clear about her trust in Providence, never doubting that her
severe physical limitations had been turned by the Hand of God into the
greatest possible good. In June of 1956, at the age of 76, she submitted an
article to Guideposts magazine in which she again referred to the tremendous
impact that Swedenborg's teachings had in her life:
Swedenborg has shaken down the barriers of time and space in my life and
supplied me with likenesses or correspondences between the world within and
the world without, which give me courage and determination beyond my three
senses.... Since my seventeenth year I have tried to live according to the
teachings of Emanuel Swedenborg. By "church" he did not mean an ecclesiastical
organization, but a spiritual fellowship of thoughtful men and women who spend
their lives for a service to mankind that outlasts them.
And she concludes her article with this great promise of hope:
There are two ways to look at destiny, one from below and the other from
above. In one view we are being pushed by irresistible forces, obsessed by the
fear that war, ignorance, and poverty will never be abolished. But looking up
to the clock of Truth, I see that man has been civilized only a few minutes,
and I rest in the assurance that out of the problems that disturb thinking
minds and warm hearts, there shall break the morning star of universal peace.
In sum, Helen Keller--like all of us--was neither angel nor demon, neither
saint nor savage, but rather another mortal, imperfect human being striving to
become all that she could be--an immortal soul on the way to perfection, born
for a specific use in the kingdom of heaven, and shaped perfectly by the
circumstances of her earthly life so that she might attain it. Truly she would
say, "I thank God for my handicaps, for through them I have found myself, my
work, and my God." She remains, for each of us who struggle daily with our own
limitations, a luminous and inspiring symbol of hope.
For a brief biography of Swedenborg and his place in
the world today, see this interview:
Williams-Hogan, Jane K. (2006). From Swedenborg to the New Church: Interview.
Religioscope. Available at:
http://religion.info/english/interviews/article_247.shtml
Study Questions:
1.1.4.3.2 to 1.5 (Report 4)
Week 9 Readings: Section 1.1.4.3.2 to 1.3.1
-
Student 1: 1, 4, 7
-
Student 2: 2, 5, 8
-
Student 3: 3, 6, 9
9.1.
(a) Explain how Divine Speech descends through the three discrete degrees of our
mind.
(b) How do you react to this knowledge?
(c) How do your friends react to this knowledge?
(d) What is your conclusion?
9.2.
(a) Explain correspondences in relation to Sacred Scripture.
(b) What is your reaction to this new knowledge?
9.3.
(a) Show how correspondences influence the way we think in daily life.
(b) Search the Web for what people know about correspondences and explain what
you found.
9.4.
(a) Many people uncritically repeat the idea that "God is energy." Give a
rational proof that this belief is illogical.
(b) Then compare the logic of the opposite idea that "God is a Person."
(c) In your opinion, why is there opposition to the view that God is a Person?
9.5.
(a) The highest idea of God is also the most rational. What is this celestial
view of God in relation to the substances of good and truth?
(b) Can you imagine having this view?
9.6.
(a) How does rational consciousness of God differ from sensuous consciousness of
God?
(b) How would you describe your consciousness of God?
(c) Contrast your consciousness of God with that of a friend or two. How do they
differ, or how are they similar?
9.7.
(a) Explain who is Swedenborg.
(b) Contrast the rational perspective on Swedenborg with the mystical
perspective that some people have.
(c) How do you relate to both of these perspectives?
9.8.
(a) Google the expression "substantive dualism" (in quotes) and then the
expression "theism and science" (in quotes). Summarize your assessment of this
literature indicating how it relates to theistic psychology.
9.9.
(a) Discuss the book or movie Matrix in relation to theistic psychology.
See for example:
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Matrix_movie
or
www.imdb.com/title/tt0133093/
Alternately, you can choose the movie What Dreams May Come. See for
example:
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/What_Dreams_May_Come
or
www.imdb.com/title/tt0120889/
If you prefer another choice, email the instructor or discuss it in class.
Week 10 Readings: Section 1.3.2 to 1.5
-
Student 1: 1, 4, 7
-
Student 2: 2, 5, 8
-
Student 3: 3, 6, 9
10.1.
(a) Explain the concept of "discrete layers of substances" in the mental world.
What is the role of correspondences in maintaining these discrete layers?
10.2.
(a) Explain the meaning of "space" in the mental world of eternity.
(b) What is there in your own experience that gives you a sense of space in the
mental world?
(c) What creates this appearance of space where there is none?
10.3.
(a) Define sensations, thoughts, and feelings in terms of spiritual substances.
(b) Explain this concept to a friend or two. What difficulty do they run into as
they try to comprehend this new idea?
(c) What is your conclusion?
10.4.
(a) What is your idea of a vacuum as you learned it from science classes?
(b) Describe the encounter between Swedenborg and Newton where they discussed
the meaning of a vacuum.
(c) What is your reaction?
10.5.
(a) Explain the difference between the concept "God as He is in Himself" vs. the
concept "God as He is outside of Himself." What's the importance of making this
distinction?
(b) How does this increase or change your understanding of God?
10.6.
(a) Explain the concept "being consciously in the Presence of God."
(b) Select a convenient day to practice being consciously in the presence of
God.
You can do this in various ways, as you see fit, but it should involve talking
to God in your mind, expressing your appreciation for all that you have and
enjoy as things coming from Him. Also, by expressing regret to Him when you
think or do something that is not heavenly, like swearing, denigrating others in
your mind, not doing what you know you should, procrastinating, doing something
that's harmful to yourself or others, etc.
You can do this exercise regardless of what your views are about God. Just enact
the role of the positive bias in science. After you had a successful day doing the above
exercise, write it up by describing what you did and what the results were.
(c) What is your overall conclusion?
10.7.
(a) Explain the benefits of studying theistic psychology. For each item you
mention, explain also how you relate to that particular benefit.
(b) Are you planning to continue studying theistic psychology on your own?
Explain your thinking about it.
10.8.
(a) Identify five revelations found in the literal meaning of the Writings of
Swedenborg.
(b) Describe each and indicate your thoughts on it. How does it relate to
anything else you know about these subjects?
10.9.
(a) Google Swedenborg. What is your impression of the activity around his name.
Give examples.
Report 4: due March 21. Answer Questions for Weeks 9 and 10.
1.5.1
Students Speak
Out on Swedenborg

In 1981, while browsing in our university library in search of Bible commentaries, I
came across a set of the works of Emanuel
Swedenborg (1688-1772). I was greatly impressed by the authoritativeness and
rationality with which the writer treated the major spiritual issues with which I had been
concerned. Is there life after death? What is it like? How can I be sure of it? Is there
Heaven and Hell? How do I prepare for Heaven? What is the role of the Bible and is it
related to the science of psychology? Is
spirituality compatible with science? Is there life on other planets?
In the Writings of
Swedenborg I was suddenly confronted with scientific, rational, empirical and
actual observational answers to these questions. Swedenborg
speaks as an eyewitness reporter, a meticulous scientific observer of
the spiritual world of the afterlife or eternity.
To me this was a unique claim in
the history of science. Swedenborg was a reputed and well respected scientist
throughout Europe. No reputable scientist in the history of science has claimed
what he has claimed, namely, that he suddenly became conscious in both worlds
when God appeared to him in a vision and awakened his consciousness in the
spiritual mind. This is the mind that is unconscious now, while we are still
conscious in our natural mind and the physical world of time and space. But when
we are resuscitated a few hours after separation of our two bodies (called
"dying"), we regain consciousness in our spiritual body and mind. Then we
gradually forget our natural language, culture, and earthly experiences, and
assume a new life in eternity with our spiritual body. We can then meet with
anyone who has already died and is living in the afterlife of eternity.
Swedenborg went through this resuscitation process so that he could describe it
as a scientist. He observed thousands of people over a 27-year period undergo
resuscitation. He interviewed many of them. He interviewed many who had
undergone resuscitation ages and ages ago.
What is amazing to me is that
this spiritual world of the afterlife is the same as our mental world right now!
See the
Layers Diagram.
You will be studying the anatomy
of the mind, that is, the anatomy of the spiritual body which contains the
mental organs. Swedenborg was an expert in anatomy and many other fields of
science. He discovered that we already live in the spiritual world of the
afterlife because every human being is born into eternity through the spiritual
body and in time through the physical body. When we are born, our conscious
awareness in daily living is our natural mind. This is the lowest layer of the
mental world of eternity. So we are very familiar with eternity, though only in
its lowest layer called "the natural layer."
Above the natural layer is the
spiritual layer which remains unconscious until our resuscitation. Then our
natural mind gradually becomes unconscious and our conscious life in eternity
then begins in our spiritual mind. The highest layer of the mental world, above
the spiritual mind, is called the celestial mind. Those who desire to live in
this layer of consciousness can. It is called the human heavens. Swedenborg
often visited this region of his mind and discovered the heavenly habitations
and cities and what daily life is like in that state of mind.
If Swedenborg had just made up
these things as a kind of fantasy or joke or science fiction, they would not fit
rationally together with all that we know in science and from Sacred Scripture.
It would be like saying, suppose you've been misled all your life and there is
really no science, just some books people have written to make it look like that
science is real. What you say? You might say, "Well look at all the teachers and
professors I've had who teach that stuff. Have they all been hoodwinked into
thinking that science is real and that all those experiments they talk about
have actually been done instead of invented?"
What makes professors and
students accept scientific knowledge and method as real? If science were all
invented, would it fit together as it does coherently and rationally, and would
it relate to the real world of engineering and manufacturing? Our acceptance
of scientific knowledge and method rests on the fact that science is rational,
consistent, cumulative, and productive.
This same philosophy
applied to Swedenborg's Writings shows to any serious reader that theistic
psychology
-
(a) is an entire field that
encompasses all of human behavior and the mind
-
(b) is a science because it is
rational, consistent, cumulative, and productive
-
(c) is a science because it
confirms its explanations with direct observation, cumulative data, and
experimental methods.
For decades I had been relentlessly searching for
methods and theories of inner growth. For my Ph.D. degree in experimental and social
psychology I was trained to think with objective behavioral concepts tied into a logical,
self-contained, and limited system. I was never satisfied with any of the theories and
speculations which abounded within and outside traditional systems of thought in the vast
literature of historical and contemporary psychology. They were all interpretive and
speculative constructions -- about the mind, about the spiritual world -- and I could
never bring myself to accept anything merely because it was being asserted as a
possibility. I was stuck with a sense of diffidence, perhaps even discouragement, if not
cynicism, when the bombshell of the Swedenborg reports exploded into my attention. Here
was something totally different, entirely new. A reputable scientist bringing back data
from the afterlife, not just from a single experience, or a few, but thousands, from
decades of daily observations lasting for hours at a time.
I longed to share my great discovery with my colleagues and students. I started
mentioning Swedenborg in my lectures whenever the topic was related to our discussions. As
my research and understanding of the extensive Swedenborg reports grew, I gradually
evolved a standard set of arguments and facts which form the outline of an integrated
theory of human behavior. This psychological theory takes a positive bias in
science , rather than a
negative bias in science towards the hypothesis that the spiritual world exists.
Since I sometimes taught an undergraduate course on the History of Psychology I frequently have
the opportunity in my lectures to present information from the Swedenborg reports. Almost
all textbooks in this area focus on the mind/body issue viewed through a chronological
exposition of writers, beginning with Ancient Greece and leading up to the twentieth
century. Since the mind/body issue comes up in every chapter I am able to bring in some
aspect of the Swedenborg reports throughout the semester. The last time I taught this course
on the history of psychology was in the spring of 1991, at the end of the
fifteen-week semester, I asked students to hand in a brief anonymous answer to the
following question:
Should Swedenborg be included in the history of scientific
psychology?
None of the existing textbooks in this area mention Swedenborg, and I wanted to know
what would be their conclusions on this issue. Of the 23 students in the class, 13 said Yes and 10 said No. It is interesting to see the
justifications they gave. Their verbatim answers follow below. These answers can
be contrasted with those given by students in the past few semesters since I
started teaching an entire course on Swedenborg, and especially the generations
since 2004 when I started teaching theistic psychology. Student comments on
theistic psychology are presented below.
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Student comments in the
History of Psychology classes:
1. Swedenborg tried to bring spirituality into science. He contributes to the
psychology of the mind. Revelation as a phenomenon has not been disproven. Others who were
wrong, were included (like Freud), so why not Swedenborg? He gives a new paradigm.
2. Swedenborg's revelations should be examined, not automatically rejected. A decision
should be made whether to include it in psychology or not. We must be careful with claims
about revelations since this can come from God or Satan!
3. Science deals with proving something as a fact. Since Swedenborg is the only one who
experienced this revelation, it should be automatically excluded from science.
Swedenborg's writings belong to religion. Therefore they must contain things that are
dogmatic. Science should be free of this and only accept ideas that have a concrete basis.
4. The fact that his ideas are based on his own experiences and no one else's, makes it
difficult for science to accept them. Where do we draw the line? Will we have to accept
anyone's experiences? Swedenborg should be mentioned as a theory maybe, but not
necessarily as fact.
5. To accept Swedenborg would be to accept the belief of God and the Spiritual World
thus forcing everyone to one person's view of God. This is dogma. Science does not allow
things in without proof (repeatable, observable evidence). Science rejects dogma. As far
as being mentioned in the history of psychology, I think Swedenborg should be mentioned
since other theorists are reviewed who were proven wrong, had no evidence, yet gave
valuable avenues of thought (e.g., Freud).
6. The spiritual view of man should receive serious consideration in psychology
textbooks. Since there is a God, to exclude revelation is foolish, and gives a seriously
distorted view of the total human psyche. The Christian viewpoint should be included in
psychology. There is no evidence that Swedenborg was mentally ill or insane, so he should
be considered. Swedenborg presents a paradigm that should not be excluded.
7. Would you believe it today if someone claimed to have seen the other world? The
definition of science excludes "faith" concepts. Still, as long as Swedenborg's
claims are remotely possible, and have not been disproven, we shouldn't dismiss his
theories, but instead, look upon them as one more paradigm. Personally, I don't think his
theories would survive very long.
8. I don't have to accept Swedenborg's views but they, along with other Christian
views, should be accepted into psychology, else psychology is reduced to a small area of
human behavior.
9. Why include him since Swedenborg's observations are not repeatable by others, and
since he requires God, which is never provable and repeatable.
10. Why exclude Swedenborg since not everything in science is provable and since God
and spirituality should be part of science. Swedenborg might provide a new important
paradigm for psychology.
11. Swedenborg cannot be included in the science of psychology since he has no
scientific basis (repeatability, measurement, proof), and is purely personal. Similarly,
Plato, Aristotle, Freud are not science.
12. In my opinion, revelation is possible so one should not totally exclude it. To
exclude Swedenborg from psychology would exclude anything spiritual from it. I'm not
arguing whether Swedenborg was right or wrong, but he may give us some valuable
information just as Freud's theories did, although some of his work has been proven wrong.
13. Swedenborg's work is based on his experiences alone and is personal. We have no
means of measuring it. How would we ever find out that what he said was true? Swedenborg
has no scientific basis so he cannot be included in psychology as science. Spirit, mind,
etc. are not concepts included in the definition of science (maybe philosophy, religion?).
How can we explain his concepts without hard core evidence?
14. Science is based on empirical facts. Therefore, revelation should not be included
in psychology unless it can be measured empirically. Swedenborg's revelations are more
like a religion, a belief. On the other hand, if you can't prove that revelations don't
exist, it may be true. Therefore, psychology should not rule it out.
15. I do think that Swedenborg and his revelations should be included in psychology
because they can help people grow mentally. Since the history of psychology already
includes the mind/body issue, why not include Swedenborg? No one has settled the debate
yet.
16. In terms of scientific theory and psychology's adherence to scientific methods in
the study and measurement of mental processes and behavior, revelation has not and will
not be proven to be possible. Because revelation is not "real" Swedenborg's
reports are not real. Therefore his reports have no scientific substance and are possibly
imagined.
17. Revelation has been reported and experienced by many notables, including
Swedenborg. His reports provide insight into and enlightenment of real life occurrences,
as well allows one to better understand the functions of and interactions between the
body, mind, and spirit. These three are central to the study of human psychology. Whether
real or made up, Swedenborg's reports provide increased understanding of human
psychological functions and behavior.
18. Swedenborg's reports must and should be respected as well as accepted by the
science of psychology. Swedenborg's viewpoint provides another paradigmatic perspective to
better understand the human psyche and gain access into learning of ultimate human
functioning.
19. Swedenborg is contributing an understanding of the mind/body issue. Revelation has
not been disproven, hence his ideas ought not to be excluded. The parts of Swedenborg that
are psychology can be used while the religious parts can be omitted.
20. We have not proven whether revelation is real or not so how can we ignore
Swedenborg's reports? That would be cutting off a possible avenue of obtaining
information. I believe that revelation is possible being that there is a spiritual and a
material world. Swedenborg's ideas cannot be excluded from the history of psychology on
the basis of being "wrong" or else everyone else's ideas from the past have to
be excluded.
21. Some of Swedenborg's ideas deal with religion, I agree, but others deal with
psychology and those should be included in psychology. The definition of science makes it
difficult to include Swedenborg but his ideas are too important to be ignored. They should
at least be presented so that others can use them to expand on. By not including them, it
means they're being rejected.
22. Swedenborg should not be include in the science of psychology. Science can be
measured - how can his reports be measured? Just because he wrote so many volumes of his
accounts - who is to say they weren't just imagination? I think Swedenborg should rather
be included in religion because the belief is based on faith (faith in Swedenborg, that he
is real).
23. Swedenborg's reports cannot be proven. His accounts can't be repeatable. True, yet
taking into account previous psychologists who have not been proven right, yet they are
accepted. Why can't that also be for Swedenborg? He should be included as a way to view
things from a different perspective. After all shouldn't psychology be open to everything
and anything in order to allow for a greater understanding of the mind?
To summarize these comments, there were 13 students (out of 23) who indicated their
support for the inclusion of Swedenborg in the science of psychology, and there were 10
who were against it. The reasons for saying Yes fall into two categories. First,
spirituality and revelation are real psychological phenomena of the mind (see student
comments numbered 1,2,6,12,15,17,18,19,20,21,23). Second, God and religion should be part
of psychology (see comments 8,10). Those who voted No also gave two main reasons. First,
Science and religion should be kept separate and Swedenborg belongs to religion (see
comments 3,9,16). Second, Swedenborg's experiences are not provable, repeatable, or
measurable (see comments 4,5,7,13,14,22). I am delighted by these results. They show that
the positive bias in science can become a new and viable paradigm for the science of psychology. In
just a few weeks of listening to my sporadic references to Swedenborg, 11 of 23 senior
college students were able to articulate for themselves the idea that spirituality and
revelation are real psychological phenomena of the mind and should be part of the science
of psychology, for which they were being professionally prepared. I am now left wondering
what it would take to achieve such a success ratio with my colleagues and fellow
scientists.
Sample student comments in
theistic psychology classes:
I had never heard of Swedenborg and when I read
his article on marriage, it reaffirmed many of my same beliefs that are
different from Christian beliefs. One of the strengths of believing this way
would be that the majority of people in the US believe in God. You are
definitely a minority when you do not believe in God. By taking this view,
God can fill in a lot of blanks that science can not fill. My view of God
and science is still the same. I do not think that God should be brought
into science - PERIOD. I do not trust the government and most religious folk
to be impartial to all religions. We can not show favoritism when it comes
to a freedom. I do believe that this approach could have a significant
impact on the future development of psychology.
When I first walked into the class, I thought
that Swedenborg was a crazy man. But, now I am more open to new ideas and
accept ideas that other individuals might not readily agree with, such as
man creating heaven and hell. I learned so much from this course, such as
looking deeper within myself and about my level of thinking and I hope that
the future students are able to do the same. I think that this course helps
us grow individually, spiritually, and mentally. I also think that this
course will help individuals search for the true meanings or purpose in
their lives.
Overall, by doing this research to answer the
question if Swedenborg should be included in the history of psychology, the
more I believe that he definitely should be. Even if not ready or willing to
completely accept Swedenborg’s idea of the spiritual world and how it
governs us, people should accept it as another possible theory of why we
act, think, and feel the way we do. By totally disregarding Swedenborg from
the history of psychology is a shame for other’s are denied the right to
decide for themselves if they want to accept Swedenborg’s psychological
views of man’s existence.
www.soc.hawaii.edu/leonj/459f2004/zukowski/459-g21-report2.htm
The ten students who thought that Swedenborg
should not be taught said that ideas like God and the afterlife are
religious ideas, not scientific ones. Since religion and science should be
separate, they say that Swedenborg belongs to religion and not science.
A second group of students who said no to
Swedenborg had the same problem that I expressed in many sections throughout
these reports. They did not think that Swedenborg should be included because
his claims are not observable to anyone else. If they are not observable to
anyone else, they cannot be measured, replicated, or proved.
I do not have that problem any longer, and I
really think that theistic psychology can be scientific. It happened when
Dr. James said that the observations and experiments, like all observations
and experiments, can be seen and repeated by anyone under the same
conditions. When the person is in the right environment, the experiments
can be replicated.
By studying theistic psychology, though, that’s
not even really necessary. A person could run experiments to prove some
ideas from theistic psychology right now by observing behavior and how it
changes under varying conditions. She could also fill in the blanks of
existing studies and theories with theistic psychology. So, it’s actually
scientific, and people who do not think so probably have not examined
theistic psychology carefully enough to understand that.
www.soc.hawaii.edu/leon/459f2006/ciano/ciano-report5.htm
The mystical perspective of Swedenborg’s writing
appears mainly in Swedenborgian religions. They believe that Swedenborg was
trying to describe mystical experiences in using these symbolic
interpretations. These new church religions have misinterpreted what
Swedenborg really was doing. He was not promoting another type of religion,
but he was using his gift to scientifically report events that occur in the
afterlife. His claimed purpose for such a gift was to enable show humans in
scientific methods how God works in our life through rational thinking,
rather than through mystical religious experiences.
The Rational Perspective
Swedenborg was given the gift of conscious dual
citizenship for the Divine mission of showing others how to rationally think
about God. In Theistic psychology, we can study Swedenborg and what he
discovered rationally because we leave out any religious connotations.
Theistic psychology agrees with Swedenborg’s observations of the spiritual
world and they are considered scientific in theistic psychology, because
when in the spiritual world, anyone can see what Swedenborg did, and anyone
could reproduce his studies. According to theistic psychology, Swedenborg’s
observations are empirical, but no one living can reproduce the conditions
to replicate his experiments. Through understanding his experiments
rationally, one can achieve a higher level of thinking.
My reaction to the mystical perspective is that
people by nature automatically assume that when we talk about God, we are
talking about religion. This is exactly what happens in the mystical
perspective when people begin reading Swedenborg’s writings. They take into
consideration the fact that we are dual citizens and we must live according
to good and truth, and so they begin creating rules, and rituals etc. It is
very easy for people to misunderstand things about God because they are
uncertain about how to go about getting to heaven. I think my relation to
this perspective is that I can understand how easy it is to misread things
and we, including myself, need to use more caution when we automatically
think we get it at a first glance, I am talking about reading text and
comprehending the correct meaning.
With regard to the rational perspective, I can
relate to it because we are able to really understand the meaning logically
through rational thinking. This is done in theistic psychology and although
people cannot believe the Swedenborg actually experienced this, if they
review the writings of Swedenborg, then perhaps they will change their
minds. The number one argument is that how ca this be science if only one
man was able to do the experiments? How can anyone replicate them? Not every
experiment needs extensive replication. People read the thesis and the
methods and in good experiments the results are common sense because of our
experience in the world. Not every experiment that is possible to replicate,
is done so to prove a theory, especially in psychology. We cannot simply
call Swedenborg’s writings invalid because of this, but rather we should
look to the law of correspondences in Sacred Scripture, scientifically
follow what we can of Swedenborg’s writings and see what we get there.
Really, it all comes down to rationally being able to think about God’s
existence.
www.soc.hawaii.edu/leon/459f2006/davis/davisreport_4.htm
When I first started this class I didn’t know
what to think of Swedenborg and his claims to being conscious in the
afterlife. It was hard to accept that what I have been taught all my life in
church was not completely true and to have a teacher sit there and tell you
that. However at the same time the information I was presented with was put
in a rational and logical was that it was hard to dispute it. The other
thing that I found was that it agreed with a majority of the things I was
taught in church only it went into deeper detail and was very specific and
left nothing up to blind faith. Till this day I cannot come to a firm
decision on what perspective I side with. This new knowledge of Theistic
Psychology gives me something to think about far beyond my educational means
for this class.
www.soc.hawaii.edu/leon/459f2006/moore/moore-report4.hm
Taking a more scientific perspective of
Swedenborg’s writing, that is with the positive bias in science, one is more inclined
to understand all facets of his writing and in doing so is exposed to the
hidden meaning of the New Testament, the Old Testament, and Swedenborg’s
writing itself.
Through mystical religion, Swedenborg is another
contributor to a religion that is slowly becoming corrupt. He is another
messenger of a literal translation of sacred scripture. Each religion dwells
on merely the literal translation of Sacred Scripture and every word is
taken at face value.
In theistic psychology, Sacred Scripture is
being translated for the hidden meaning behind what is actually written. In
theistic psychology Swedenborg is the largest contributor to the ideas
presented, he began the idea of theistic psychology and is much appreciated
for his discoveries.
Swedenborg’s Writing is rationally analyzed by
very few scientists, enlightening them on God’s plan and God’s existence in
our lives, through theistic psychology, is not mysterious but thoroughly
explained. By exploring the entire mental world, Swedenborg has produced
answers to many questions that through religion remain mysterious. It offers
answers that were not capable of being answered before. Because of this, it
is a rational understanding.
www.soc.hawaii.edu/leon/459f2006/afonin/afonin-report4.htm
I think I can say his perspective can be as
scientific facts because even it is not measurable, it is understandable
because the reason why we can not measure it is we can not measure anything
in the spiritual world because the physical world and spiritual world are
completely separate. It does not matter whether it is measurable or
observable for anyone, Swedenborg explained and proved enough these are not
measurable and observable. He stated enough details to prove these are facts
and these can be as scientific facts.
www.soc.hawaii.edu/leon/459f2006/suzuki/suzuki-report5.htm
The Writings reveal and demonstrate that all
Sacred Scripture is Divine Speech transformed into a natural language.
The Writings reveal a rational method of
reconstructing the original content of Divine Speech before it was
transformed and written down in a natural language. We need to do be able to
do this reconstruction or recovery, since the natural version of Divine
Speech in Sacred Scripture is mostly natural in content and appears as
history and prophecy. The spiritual information about God, the afterlife, or
God's management laws of the universe, are hidden from the literal sense of
Sacred Scripture. And yet it is the spiritual information that we need in
order to form a rational understanding of God and how God runs the universe.
We cannot invent hypothetical interpretations and hope to be fully right.
Then we won't know when we are right and when wrong, and our spiritual
progress will end in contradiction and conflict. Therefore God must reveal
to us a rational method for recovering from Divine Speech what He tells us
about the spiritual world and the rational laws He uses to manage the
universe.
The Writings of Swedenborg are therefore a
scientific revelation because they give us rational methods for discovering
what God has been telling us through Divine Speech encoded and transformed
into a natural language. Theistic psychology is the knowledge we can extract
from these scientific revelations. Whatever is thus extracted must follow
the laws of extraction set forth in Divine revelation. If we use other
methods of extraction we get nowhere towards the truth.
www.soc.hawaii.edu/leonj/459f2004/nakamura/459-g21-report2.htm
I have always been conscious
of God. Since I went to church sporadically I was always taught that God
was present in all that we do and watches every move we make and all that
happens in the world around us. Very few of my friends went to church, so
they were not at same level of consciousness of God as me. After taking
this class, my level of consciousness has been elevated high above my
friends.
I am now equipped with specific rational and
logical explanations of what goes on in the spiritual world of the
afterlife in eternity. I have also be given the instructions on how to
protect myself from my inherited hellish traits in order for me to be able
to give them up and choose the heaven of my mind after my resuscitation.
www.soc.hawaii.edu/leon/459f2006/inayoshi/Inayoshi-report4.htm
I’m not sure if I understand the idea of
rational consciousness the way Theistic Psychology would like me to. I
understand that what is physical is only surface value and there is
probably a deeper meaning that we need to try to see. It sounds like
Theistic Psychology would say that every action and event in the physical
world has a spiritual correspondence, but I don’t think I can see things
that way yet. Theistic Psychology may say that if my friend drops a pen,
it means that there is some important correspondence in the spiritual
world, but I would probably still view that is simply a friend dropping a
pen. As far as the Bible and Sacred Scripture, I completely agree that
there is more to understand than the face value that we get when we simply
read the words on the page. We need to meditate on those words and try to
see what God wants us to get out of those words. The interpretation I get
may not be the same that Theistic Psychology would call rational thought,
but it is definitely beyond what is written in physical words.
www.soc.hawaii.edu/leon/459f2006/takahashi/takahashi-report4.htm
At a rational level of understanding, the
spiritual world is produced from Light and Heat from the Spiritual Sun.
God is infinite who produces and created all spiritual events, which then
produces natural events. Therefore everything in the mind is also products
of the Spiritual Sun. This means that all mental events are produced in
the spiritual body in the spiritual world. The mind in the spiritual world
consists of our thoughts and feelings made from the substances of the
Spiritual Sun.
b) Since the goal of theistic psychology is to
enhance and prepare the quality of one’s life for eternity, theistic
psychology needs to develop the consciousness from scientific revelations
to provide us with the Divine Truth from the Divine Speech in Sacred
Scripture. People need to be taught and understand scientific revelations
in a rational way to become knowledgeable of God’s plan for us. With this
true knowledge our mind is capable of rationally building a heaven for
eternity.
www.soc.hawaii.edu/leon/459s2006/bulda/bulda-459-g24-report2.htm
People should be concerned about their
afterlife because according to theistic psychology when we are in the
physical world, we are actually preparing our life in the spiritual world
that is for eternity. In the physical world we are creating our own
environment for our eternity. Since all of our affective, cognitive, and
sensorimotor organs are recording all of our thoughts, feelings and
sensations while in the natural world, we must learn to live righteously
according to God’s Divine Speech.
With this true knowledge our mind is capable
of rationally building a heaven for eternity. If we are not knowledgeable
of the Divine Truth of God and choose to believe the false loves in our
life in the physical world then we have chosen to live in the hells of our
mind for eternity. After we have past and are resuscitated, we will see
the spiritual world as we have developed and created it while on earth.
(e) The vertical community is located in the
spiritual world in which the spiritual body can be seen, heard, touched by
other spiritual bodies in the spiritual world. Communication in the
vertical community only occurs when there are similar thoughts and
feelings amongst other minds of different spirits. This means that we are
never alone in our thoughts and feelings because we are not capable of
doing so without the association of other minds.
People should focus on their dual citizenship
because our thoughts and feelings in the natural world affect our
environment in the spiritual world forever. Since we are dual citizens,
whatever we feel, think, or sensate on earth will be permanent in our
spiritual mind. When we are resuscitated after we pass, we will end up
associating in a vertical community with those having the same thoughts of
feelings.
Another reason why people should be concerned
of their dual citizenship is because when we are resuscitated, we will
begin to see God’s spiritual world as a process, but only those who have
opened up their internal-natural organ and have built a rational level of
thinking will be able to be prepared for the rejections of the loves of
hell that will be presented to them to choose for eternity.
www.soc.hawaii.edu/leon/459s2006/bulda/bulda-459-g24-report2.htm
Growing up in a Swedenborgian society I was
always taught that the natural world was correspondential to what is
happening in the spiritual world. However, this is a difficult concept to
grasp when you are young. It was not until the onset of my young adulthood
that I was able to formulate a rational idea of this concept. Although the
idea that science and religion can be very well connected it did not
appear to me that that was what the world as a whole understood. It still
seemed to be in ignorance on the matter. Because of the worlds inability
to understand the relationship of religion and science it either
completely abandoned one of the two. Thus we get atheistic science, and
religions that completely disregard scientific findings. Thus we get the
dichotomization of science and religion.
This dichotomy is not a universal perspective
though. There seems to be a growing attempt at finding ways to integrate
the two. The focus of my research on the web was to see some of the ways
people have been trying to incorporate science and religion together. The
following discussions are about those attempts and how they can be
compared to theistic science. (...)
Imagine how scientists would react if they
found out that science could investigate the afterlife, heaven, hell, Gods
relation to man, and all things related to spiritual? Swedenborg did just
that! It was the scientific investigation of the spiritual realm. It is
the bridge between science and religion. The problem is that most people
refuse to believe that Swedenborg had access to the spiritual. The gap
between science and religion is here, but the rigid closure of peoples
mind is what makes the bridge seem inexistent. (...)
Theistic psychology is the incorporation of
God and spirituality into modern science and psychology using the works of
Emanuel Swedenborg. Swedenborg was an 18th century scientist who was given
by God access to the spiritual world. Having his spiritual eyes open,
Swedenborg had many discussions with angels and spirits in the spiritual
world. Through the discussions, observations, and experiments he did in
the spiritual world he was able to write down many volumes to describe the
spiritual world and how it operated and related to the natural world.
Psychology and science today function from a
monistic and materialistic perspective. Because of this it functions from
the atheistic perspective also. All theories involved in modern science
are based on a rational account of the empirical investigation of the
natural world. According to science today, all things the in world have
their cause in the natural, physical world.
Theistic psychology and science function from
dualism rather than monism. It sees the mind as something entirely
separate from the body and the brain. This is one of the most distinct
differences between theistic psychology and psychology today. To theistic
psychology the mind is something that is spiritual and eternal. It is what
makes up our spiritual lives. The brain and the body are just things that
the mind work through in order to function in the natural world. But when
we die in this world our body and brain cease to exist while our mind
endures forever. (...)
This is where the Writings of Emanuel
Swedenborg become so important. Because the mind is spiritual one needs
revelation in order to truly understand it. The mind is an extremely
complex entity that we can only begin to truly understand while we are in
the natural world, but the divine revelations of Emanuel Swedenborg allow
one to begin to cohere how it functions and works.
In order to understand how the mind (which is
spiritual) works, one has to go back to the Primary Cause of all things
which is God. God is the perpetual creator and maintainer of all things in
the universe. If one were to erase God than all else would fail to exist,
for an effect cannot exist without its cause, and God is the cause of all
life. The first emanation from God is the spiritual sun, which exists in
the spiritual world and is only visible to angels in the three heavens.
This effulgent sun radiates divine heat and divine light. This comes forth
in the spiritual substances of divine love and wisdom, also known as good
and truth. Good and truth are what give life to everything in the
universe, just as the light and heat of the natural sun is the external
cause of all things in the natural world. Through the divine process of
influx every individual receives infinite divine love and wisdom from God.
The internal mind is the vessel for these spiritual substances. The will
receives divine love, and the understanding receives divine wisdom. Our
life is imperatively dependent on the constant influx of the spiritual
substances of divine love and wisdom. Without this influx we would cease
to exist. The state of our mind is directly proportional to our reception
or rejection of these spiritual substances.
www.soc.hawaii.edu/leonj/459s2004/cooper/report1.htm
The main problem I have with accepting that
the Writings are factual is that they are not verifiable. We can not truly
be sure that Swedenborg actually did travel throughout the spiritual
world. Eventually we will be able to test his data, but this will only
happen when we die and go to the spiritual world. I do not see how there
is any way to test the validity of his Writings in this world. This is why
that I think that until the Writings can be shown to be true and accurate
descriptions of heaven and hell, then we have nothing to stand as the
basis for theistic psychology. Theistic psychology seems similar to
religion, in that we must use faith to believe that these Writings are
scientific. Also, even though the Writings are consistent with other known
facts and consistent within themselves, that does not necessarily mean
that they are factual. I think that the Writings are different from other
theories (such as those of Freud) because those theories are verifiable.
We could show that some of Freud’s theories are false. How will we ever be
able to do such tests with the Writings? I do not think that they should
be considered scientific theory because there is no way to show that they
are either true or false. However, until the Writings of Swedenborg are
shown to be scientific and rational revelations, I will keep the positive
bias in science and know that it is possible that this is exactly what they are. On
the other hand, there is no evidence that shows that Swedenborg was not
schizophrenic or delusional, so I will also keep the positive bias in
science that it
is possible this is exactly what he was.
www.soc.hawaii.edu/leonj/459s2004/howard/459report1.htm
We should be thankful for Emanuel Swedenborg.
His contributions to the world scientifically and spiritually are numerous
and his ability to live in the spiritual world and physical world is
evidence that there is a higher divine being. [TP 1.0 section 7] This
divine being is called the Divine Psychologist. The Divine Psychologist is
a very important factor in Theistic Psychology. When one reads about the
Divine Psychologist in the Sacred Scriptures the term Divine Psychologist
refers to God, an omnipotent and human being. God in theistic Psychology
is equivalent to, Divine Human in Whom infinite things are one, Divine
Love proceeding as Divine Truth, Spiritual Sun, love, and spiritual light,
the Divine Speech, Sacred Scripture, God's blueprint for running the
universe, mental development. He is considered a “human being” because
like a human being, the Divine Psychologist has thoughts and feelings.
Knowing that God has thoughts and feelings like us, allows us to form a
closure bond with him. In every major religion and even in our modern day
dictionary, there is a similar thread of God as an omnipotent, thoughtful
and a caring authority.
One must accept this concept because by
accepting that there is a God, people will know that there is something
more to the physical world than what we see. After we die, there is a
heaven and a hell (that we create) depending whether or not we live our
lives according to God’s teachings. If the concept was left out for the
reason of acceptance, than people will have no one to build a relationship
with or communicate with. The concept of God will allow one to understand
why things are the way they are in the physical world and why the world
was created and works. This understanding will lead a person to want to
build an in-depth relationship with the Divine Being, a relationship that
would be nonexistent if the concept of God disappeared. There should be no
alternative to the Divine Psychologist. Either you accept the concept as a
whole, or not at all. The relationship between the Divine Psychologist and
the human psychologist is that the Divine Psychologist shows the human
psychologist a deeper meaning in life.
www.soc.hawaii.edu/leon/459s2006/jones/jones-459-g24-report1.htm
I believe in the idea of God and a guardian
angel. I have always believed in this idea since I was a young child. I
would not need to change in my ideas to accept the idea of the Divine
Psychologist. The psychology of cooperation is our cooperation as a person
with the Divine Psychologist. We must cooperate by examining our inner
life, judging it by means of the doctrine of truth from Sacred Scripture,
cease doing what is not allowed or condemned thereby, and start doing what
is allowed or commanded. By doing this we will prepare our minds to not
give into temptations and help ourselves created a more spiritual heaven
in our mind.
This could be something that is important to
me right now because I do not know when I am going to die and when I do I
want to be prepared mentally to go to heaven. I know that I do not want to
spend eternity in the hell of my mind. I think that if I start slowly not
in the future choosing to do good and not give into evil tendencies will
be easier and more instinctive. I think that everyone should be trying to
do good and choosing that over evil temptations. (...)
I learned that one must give up their hellish
traits and embrace heavenly loves to get into the spiritual world. I
learned about reformation and the second death. I realized that I will
need to chose all my heaven loves over my hellish loves. I know now that I
need to focus on all the good and rational thinking. I need to let go my
evil thoughts and irrationality. It helped me learn what is important in
my life.
I learned that there is one omnipotent God and
I realized that I need to be more careful on what I do on earth because it
will effect my afterlife. I learned that there are in fact angels and
devils. I learned that there is a afterlife, a heaven or a hell. I learned
that there is more life than this natural earth and there is more to look
forward to after our physical death. It gave me more to look forward to.
I have learned so much in theistic psychology
over this one semester that I do not know where to start or where to end.
I have learned such valuable life information. I know that it has made me
more educated and helped me know how to change my life for the better. I
learned about heaven traits vs. hell traits and I think for me that was
the most important. It made me realize that I need to be a better person
so that I can prepare my mind for the spiritual heaven. I know what I need
to work on.
www.soc.hawaii.edu/leon/459f2005/alcover/alcover-459-g23-report2.htm
It is apparent that students new to the idea
of Swedenborg always have doubts. And the first day of class (and most
classes thereafter) there will be one student who asks a question of
skepticism. I think you should use this inevitability as an asset to the
class. If someone asks the question “How the heck is it possible that the
spiritual world is shaped like a human???” Let him have his doubt, then
ask either for the whole class or specific volunteers to search for
information on The Grand Human and also bring in any info their own
religion/beliefs has on the shape of the spiritual world (if there is
any).
Next class period, re-raise the question and
let the other students answer him. Then look at the Buddhist view, or the
Mormon view on the shape of the spiritual world and see the connections
between what Swedenborg wrote and what they believe. This will put the
universal quality of Swedenborg in light and quicken the process of making
that connection between one’s own beliefs and how Swedenborg does not
contradict religions, he helps explain them on a much higher level. This
is a connection which would most likely happen later in the course anyway,
but I think discussions setup like this would speed up the process.
Also, having the students ask the questions
and answer the questions will give them motivation to explore the Writings
independently. I like the idea of bringing religions into the discussion,
because it is real. Even if having a religious viewpoint is evidence of a
natural minded thinking, people are more familiar and more comfortable
with religion than with higher spirituality. Showing them, or rather,
letting them show each other, the connections between religions and having
them see the Swedenborg Reports cannot fall into one of these categories,
but the umbrellas will help you and the students find common ground.
Also using more contemporary examples and
vocabulary would help students make the connection between what Swedenborg
writes about and what they are living now, in the 21st Century. There is
defiantly a way to bridge the chasm between his understanding/your
understanding and ours. Relate the vortex of the mind to that guilty à
angry sequence of feelings one goes through when they are caught making a
mistake. Explain the mental pathways in terms of REAL life. The thought
process you have to go through in order to say no to cheating on your
spouse, or explain why it is so difficult to say no to getting a beer with
the guys even though you don’t drink! It’s because you are not just
grappling with wanting to drink alcohol, you are fighting against the evil
spirits in HELL!
I think it is hard for many people to see the
relevance of something that happened 2000 years ago (Jesus’ death) or the
relevance of the spiritual world in their bill paying, cell phone talking,
test cramming life of today. That’s where you come in. You can show people
how the actions of today can have eternal implications! Explain to them
how the more they resist extramarital sex, excessive drinking and drugs
the stronger their character will be!
There are so many young adults who have been
completely turned off to the Bible and the idea of God after bad
experiences in their life, and through your class you can explain to them
the meaning within the Bible. The exciting significance of MISTAKES in our
lives and how they are representative of our spiritual placement! There is
extreme relevance in the Bible and in the Writings that lost young adults
do not readily see and you have the opportunity to open their eyes, so God
can save their lives.
www.soc.hawaii.edu/leon/459s2005/swenson/459-g22-report2.htm
I am better able to look at my own thoughts
and experiences and understand how I need to change my behavior in order
to have a deeper connection with God. I want to personally grow
emotionally, mentally and spiritually and I feel that Theistic Psychology
has helped me to do so. However, I have only just begun this long journey
and have a lot of work ahead of me!
As I stated above, this course has given me
answers to a lot of confusion that I have had about various religious
groups and the people who belong to them. I feel like I understand their
behavior more rationally and can look at them from a perspective that is
not hostile or discriminatory (merely because I haven’t understood) and
now I can be more accepting and loving in my approach to other people.
I agree with the perspective of Theistic
Psychology because it makes sense! Plain and simple. A student in class on
the first day had taken this course before. She could tell we all thought
our teacher was insane for teaching a course like this, and she said,
“just wait, it makes perfect sense, and you will understand, just give it
a try.” She was right, I did and it does make sense. When something rings
true for you, and you understand rationally, you can accept it as truth
and begin to incorporate it into your life.
www.soc.hawaii.edu/leon/459s2005/beard/459-g22-report2.htm
Theistic Psychology offers a scientific
approach that completes the religious perspective and makes it true and
rational by explaining the reality of God. The incomplete perspective that
religions preach are the cause negative aspects associated with religion.
Theistic psychology completes and extracts the true meaning of Sacred
Scripture by means of scientific revelations.
While theistic psychology consistently remains
rational and scientific, religion is driven by blind faith and mysticism.
Religion is dependent on the membership of the community and is based on
the member’s willingness to believe the teachings of a particular prophet.
It is only obvious that when mystical groups are formed on belief systems,
the outcome will include a diversity of religions because different people
acquire different beliefs while growing up.
The different beliefs are shown when different
religions interpret and explain the same phenomena or events provided in
sacred scripture in different ways with different contradictory meanings.
Religions apply the literal meaning of the Bible and their membership is
mostly based with associating God with history and culture. Theistic
psychology is universal and when the true scientific meaning is extracted
from the literal sentences through correspondence, the scripture becomes
universal and useful for all mankind.
Theistic psychology derives the scientific
explanation for the terms and concepts used in religion. This is possible
through correspondences found in the terms used in religious practices.
The correspondences help us “translate” the hidden revelations in the
literal sentences of sacred scripture. The science of correspondences
helps us decode the true rational meaning expressed in the Bible. Now that
these correspondences are available to us we can understand what
constitutes as sin, salvation, hell, heaven, omnipotence, prayer, etc.
rather than believe the interpretations of these terms.
www.soc.hawaii.edu/leon/459s2005/valle/459-g22-report2.htm#PriorGenerations
The Divine Psychologist is the key to
understanding Theistic Psychology’s role in today’s society. Depending on
our thoughts and actions in the Spiritual World, we can be sent to the
heaven or hells of our mind. What the Divine Psychologist does is try to
test us with our hellish thoughts to make us stronger within the heavens
of our mind. It is through Him that we can make ourselves better people
and to understand our limitations and to embrace them.
The Divine Psychologist is there to guide us and to challenge us. He is
the one who allows us to become better than we currently are and be in a
state of always trying to improve ourselves. It is because of Him that we
are able to live in the heavens of our mind, if we are willing to accept
what He has to give us.
d) In order for someone to believe in the value of the teachings of
Theistic Psychology, you must take on the positive bias. All that the
positive bias asks is that you, as a student of Theistic Psychology,
consider the possibility that the writings of Swedenborg are empirical and
can be proven- just not in the natural world.
By taking on the positive bias, the student can reap the full benefits of
all that Theistic Psychology is teaching. It may be difficult because we
are taught through science that we need physical evidence that things
happen in order for us to believe it. That is the negative bias. (...)
This course has given me a better idea of
heaven and hell because what was said through the readings and discussions
in class painted a more rational picture. It makes sense that in heaven we
are not in the natural world and that we are close to God. It also made
sense that hell is a place that seems dark and scary from the viewpoint of
someone who does not want to be there. What I found really interesting was
learning how one gets to heaven or hell. Religion has always made it known
that you go to hell because you sinned and God put you there when you die.
It is reassuring to know that we determine our own afterlife based on our
ruling loves. (...)
The first thing I think any student of
Theistic Psychology should know is to accept the positive bias. All Dr.
James asks is to accept the possibility that God exists, he does not say
you have to believe in it. Once you accept the possibility your studies in
Theistic Psychology will become much easier and then you can form your own
beliefs once you gain enough insight into what Theistic Psychology is
telling you.
www.soc.hawaii.edu/leon/459f2005/sonoda/report2.htm
We must cooperate with the Divine Psychologist
by the daily practices of self-witnessing. This can be considered a
spiritual practice because it involves the motivation of doing for the
purpose of our character reformation which will be very important in the
afterlife. This is one of the main important topic in theistic psychology.
Self-witnessing is the self-observation of our feelings, intentions,
thoughts, perceptions, focus of attention, social appearance, and actions
or movements of the body, hands, legs, eyes, etc. These are the procedures
that every individual accomplishes in the course of their entire life in a
group or society. These procedures can be observed by our self-monitoring
skills, when we are fully motivated by the spiritual discipline.
Our task in cooperating with the Divine Psychologist is to exert the
mental effort of:
(a) examining our inner life
(b) judging it by means of the doctrine of truth from Sacred Scripture
(c) cease doing what is not allowed or condemned thereby
(d) start doing what is allowed or commanded
This process prepares your mind for temptations, the main method the
Divine Psychologist does to regenerate our will or what is known as our
affective organ, from hellish to heavenly. This will help in reformation.
A new affective organ is provided which is then grown and expanded
gradually as the person is regenerating. There are natural, spiritual, and
celestial temptations, and each category has a developmental series that
must be started or experienced. The result is a spiritual heaven in our
spiritual mind that is prepared and ready for each of us, as we undergo
the second death or reformation of our mind. (...)
I believe in the idea of God and a guardian
angel. I have always believed in this idea since I was a young child. I
would not need to change in my ideas to accept the idea of the Divine
Psychologist. The psychology of cooperation is our cooperation as a person
with the Divine Psychologist. We must cooperate by examining our inner
life, judging it by means of the doctrine of truth from Sacred Scripture,
cease doing what is not allowed or condemned thereby, and start doing what
is allowed or commanded. By doing this we will prepare our minds to not
give into temptations and help ourselves created a more spiritual heaven
in our mind. (...)
This could be something that is important to me right now because I do not
know when I am going to die and when I do I want to be prepared mentally
to go to heaven. I know that I do not want to spend eternity in the hell
of my mind. I think that if I start slowly not in the future choosing to
do good and not give into evil tendencies will be easier and more
instinctive. I think that everyone should be trying to do good and
choosing that over evil temptations. (...)
I learned that even though one is married on
earth in the natural life. After natural death and while in the spiritual
world one may get remarried to someone who is more compatible and suitable
for that person or wait for their husband/wife if they are meant to be. I
found this very surprising and interesting. It just made me realize that I
need to be more aware who I chose to end up with. I hope that I find my
soul mate and end up in complete happiness. (...)
I have learned so much in theistic psychology
over this one semester that I do not know where to start or where to end.
I have learned such valuable life information. I know that it has made me
more educated and helped me know how to change my life for the better. I
learned about heaven traits vs. hell traits and I think for me that was
the most important. It made me realize that I need to be a better person
so that I can prepare my mind for the spiritual heaven. I know what I need
to work on. (...)
www.soc.hawaii.edu/leon/459f2005/alcover/alcover-459-g23-report2.htm
The concept of the Divine Psychologist is a
very essential feature of theistic psychology [TP Section 6.3.1.1.1 (IX)].
The purpose and function of every concept in theistic psychology is to
develop and open up the interior-spiritual organ, to do our thinking and
reasoning through spiritual-rational concepts of the Divine Speech rather
than through natural-rational concepts of Divine Speech. The Divine
Psychologist cooperates with our minds to reason and to think rationally
about the decisions that we make everyday. The Divine Psychologist is God
who is omnipotence and omnipresence in everything we do and think. It is
through Gods’ Divine Speech that we are constantly trying to understand
the underlying meaning of Sacred Scripture that is universal, and
biological throughout the entire human race, which, are presented in the
Old Testament, New Testament, and the Writings Sacred Scriptures. (...)
I had always believed that God was omnipotent
and omnipresence. I had never pictured the Divine Psychologist as a
scientific concept or as a collector of my feelings of heaven or hells to
be built in my spiritual heaven and spiritual hell of my mind yet; I can
easily comprehend how God helps me to make decisions throughout my day to
be as altruistic as I can so far understand. In order for me to fully
accept every idea as completely real in my life, I would have to presume
the positive bias role. From this position, I am able to open up my
spiritual rational organ to understand the underlying meanings of the
Sacred Scriptures that I have already been exposed to from my religious
background. I can then allow self-witnessing to occur to self-modify my
actions to prepare my own spiritual heaven. (...)
The Divine Psychologist was present in my
thoughts about indulging into more chocolates. I began to think of the
unnecessary excess amounts of chocolates that I wanted to continue to eat,
but this behavior would not be rational at all. Because I was fantasizing
a hellish enjoyment, due to the fact that I was eating it because I was
sad, I realized that this chocolate has nothing to do with my own true
happiness. This chocolate will not bring me happiness to my mind, but
instead it will allow me to destroy my physical body which is a part of
God. From this Monday night, I would have to self-modify my habits into
healthy habits that instead of being in pursuit of my selfish temporary
happiness, into habits for the sake of Gods’ pure Love, which will build
my eternal heavens. (...)
My assessment of how other classmates react to
the study of theistic psychology is that the entire class can understand
the concept but may not believe it to be true. In my class, the students
are all very intelligent and with some studying on their own time, each of
my classmates is capable of explaining the specific concepts that we have
so far discussed. Although each student can understand the concepts of
theistic psychology, I don’t believe that they will take the concepts
seriously to model their life accordingly. The entire class has a somewhat
negative bias in general, but will assume the positive bias role in order
to understand the concept. Most of us are very shocked and overwhelmed by
the new theory we are presented with, but are very eager to understand the
concept. (...)
www.soc.hawaii.edu/leon/459s2006/bulda/bulda-459-g24-report1.htm
The term mental biology was hard for me to
understand when I first heard about it. It took me a little while before I
understood what this term meant. As we started to discuss this topic more
in class, I could see how it was related to almost everything in theistic
psychology. Mental biology is a very important aspect in understanding
certain things in theistic psychology and how they relate to other topics.
The way that I understand mental biology is that it is the basis of how
our physical body is able to do things that we are subconsciously unaware
of. Some examples of this are looking at certain things or walking. How do
we know we are doing this? It feels so natural to us to do these things,
but if you think rationally, you must believe that there is somewhere that
these actions and movements have derived from. They could not have
possibly have been created out of thin air.
We are able to move in our physical world through the meaning of mental
biology. In order for us to move, our affective organ and cognitive organ
must work together in harmony. Our cognitive organ is important in that it
controls our thinking, which occurs in our mind. Our affective organ is
important because it is our source or motivation. Thinking about it
rationally, without the unity of these two organs we would not be able to
create movement. Using the example of walking, the cognitive organ, which
is involved with thinking, is thinking about how to walk. On the other
hand, the affective organ is the motivational force that is giving the
purpose for walking. Therefore we are thinking and wanting to walk. One
may say how can this be possible, because they are not thinking about
walking, but rather the legs just do it by themselves. (...)
By learning this diagram I have opened myself
up to the possibility of theistic psychology. Prior to this I had no idea
of how any of these things worked. To be really honest I didn’t really
care. Learning this has not contradicted anything I believed in because I
really didn’t know what to believe, and I had no beliefs about it. I’m
glad that I have learned this because it has expanded my knowledge to
other possibilities and have gave me some answers to questions that I have
always pondered. (...)
I personally think that this is a great
concept. I think that this is the only rational way for God to maintain
order in the universe and at the same time grant us free will. I think
that this concept of as-of-self is a perfect way to put how God is able to
give us freedom and at the same time omnipotent. I can easily accept this
concept because I can see the rationality and fairness in it. I don’t
think that I would be able to think of another way to set up a system like
this. I don’t think that it is important that you accept this concept
because I think that the bottom line is that you feel that you have your
own personal freedom. As long as you feel that you have this freedom you
will be happy and have the opportunity to decide what you do on a daily
basis, and where you will end up in the after life. (...)
www.soc.hawaii.edu/leon/459s2006/chang/chang-459-g24-report2.htm
Through this class, I discussed many times
about theistic psychological view, but no one has positive bias
unfortunately. It is because of their lack of knowledge about theistic
psychology and also lack of my explanation about concepts of theistic
psychology.
However, their fundamental position of negative bias is based on monism or
materialism. Most of my friends said if Swedenborg saw what happens in the
spiritual world, he had to prove why he could acquire the ability. He
could not say just when he was 57 years old, he became to see and
experience both spiritual and physical worlds at the same time. If he
proved it experimentally or scientifically, more people can be able to
believe and understand what he said because if people can not understand
and believe why he acquired the skill, people might just think he made up
a story.
I agree what my friends said, yet I also could say the Writing of
Swedenborg might be true because it is consistent and valuable for each
person’s life. (...)
As I mentioned several times, the basic
concepts of theistic psychology were super hard for me. For example, the
existence of God as a scientific fact, afterlife, mental levels, etc were
unfamiliar to me before. Dr. James said in class once that all science
should follow the theistic psychological views. When he said, my reaction
was “WHAT!?” because I thought what he meant was we have to think
everything based on the God. At that time, I still kept thinking that the
theistic psychology is kind of a religious belief. Now, I understand that
every feelings and thoughts are in our mind and these are correlated to
the God. (...)
www.soc.hawaii.edu/leon/459f2006/suzuki/suzuki-report5.htm
Seeing God as a person is dependant on the
thinking, feeling, acting aspects of God, but to love God as truth, a
person would have to see the reality, the essence, or the essential idea
behind God as a person. The idea of the idea behind God as a person
becomes the significant understanding that people who live in the
celestial layer have, which creates a perspective that allows them to love
good and truth as God. (...)
I can imagine having this view of God and the universe, and I think it
would be wonderful. It seems like something that people should be able to
appreciate and want to work towards. Existing in the celestial mind is
something that I think people would look forward to if they knew about it.
Also, knowing that higher perspectives are out there is motivation for
people, I think, to cultivate understanding as high as possible now since
they can see what is available later if they reach for it and make it
possible. (...)
I can have a positive bias that Swedenborg
made the observations, but I still think it takes a leap of faith to call
it science when it’s impossible to replicate until death. I can see how it
might be science, though, with enough understanding of theistic
psychology.
Not every experiment needs extensive replication. People read the thesis
and the methods and in good experiments the results are common sense
because of our experience in the world. Some experiments are replicated by
people on a daily basis in their lives because the effect is the law of
the world. I think the principles of theistic psychology work. If someone
sees them and practices them in their daily lives and thinks rationally
about it all the time, Swedenborg’s results may just become logical sense,
like saying “What goes up must come down.” (...)
It is not the physical layer in which God
exists. God is in the mental world and is the essential idea behind every
object, and he is the most true, most pure essence of everything. Since
the physical is the least true, complete form that things can take, we
might know that God does not exist in the physical.
Despite the surface deceptiveness to our
natural minds, the physical is still good and true, but it is good and
true because it is connected to its own spiritual layers through laws of
correspondences. The physical is the end result of causes in the mental or
spiritual layers, the inmost being God. So, everything is caused by God.
The laws of correspondences do not only work
for each object in the physical world. Correspondences work for the whole
physical world and the whole mental world. The mental world is not
private. All humans share it and live in it, and it is created in
correspondence with God’s thoughts. The mental world is both our thoughts
and the world we live in and become conscious of after death. Each
discrete layer in every physical person and object correlates with a layer
of the mental world, and is that layer of the mental world.
www.soc.hawaii.edu/leon/459f2006/ciano/ciano-report4.htm
This concept can directly apply to me. When I
go to church and focus on the teachings of God or Sacred Scripture I am
taught heavenly ways. With these heavenly thoughts and feelings in my mind
I am closely conjoined with God, because if my thoughts and feelings are
focused on my heavens the closer I can be conjoined to God and the more
good and truth I can receive from Him.
This also applies to me because God is conjoined to me in my mental mind
and my thoughts and feelings. He has extended Himself to me. It is
important to note that the parts of Himself that He has extended to me is
not mine but His.
A new application I found is that religion can help someone regardless of
the particular religion, as long as it is based on the Sacred Scripture.
As long as hellish traits are minimized and heavenly traits are focused
on, they can be closely conjoined with God; receiving more of the
substances of good and truth from Him. This knowledge could be very
helpful if more people knew about it. So many religious groups are so
focused on which church is the “right” or “true” church, when really all
the churches that base their teachings on sacred scripture are helping
human beings in the same way. This knowledge can be used to end many
“holy” wars in the middle east and in the holy land of Jerusalem. (...)
God hides his sensuous presence in the natural
mind and rational mind due to the very reason why we are put here on
Earth. We are put here on Earth because when we are born we have inherited
hells and heavens already in our body. In order for us to be “accountable”
for our actions we must have an equal chance to either dwell in our hells
or dwell in our heavens.
Due to this necessity of freedom of choice God needs to stay hidden so
that one can make their freedom of choice on their own, of self effort and
one’s willingness to resist temptations. If God would revile himself
people will not be given the choice to reject Him. (...)
This is the most difficult question I have had
to answer so far. The reason is because I can not find anything in his
reports I have objections with. Everything he has said goes along with
what I have been taught and believe in. This makes understanding the
Swedenborg reports easy for me. In fact, I find that it is easier to
understand then sacred scripture. These reports are written so logically
it is hard to find objections. Rather then finding objections to his
writings there is one topic I think I need more explanation and
clarification on
In stead of listing some objections I will just talk about a topic I need
clarification on. The issue is that our spiritual or mental body is not in
existence until we are born. I was always taught that we exist in the
spirit world where we stay until it is out time to get a physical body and
come to Earth. I was taught that our families were already planned in
heaven where we choose who are parents were going to be. Again in
agreement with theistic psychology we need to come to Earth so we can have
the opportunity to choose to accept God or reject Him. I find it hard to
understand that if or mental body is eternal how can it be created when we
are born; instead of already existing and only the physical body is
created at conception.
For the time being my current position on this issue is going to remain at
what I have been taught by my religion. I am sure there may be missing
information from my religion and/or from theistic psychology that can
better help me understand this issue. I am not saying that theistic
psychology is wrong or that my religion is wrong, only that I need more
information until I can make a decision on which stance I find more
logical and rational.
www.soc.hawaii.edu/leon/459f2006/moore/moore-report2.htm
I react to this knowledge in the positive bias
in science. We must assume it as a possibility and move forward logically
from there. When you take it in from that standpoint, you can see clearly
that this is highly useful and inspirational knowledge to come across.
It is very useful because it allows us to see the world more clearly and
under the right light. Also, it gives us the opportunity to find a
treasure trove of information previously unseen in the sacred scripture.
There is a plethora of information and guidance pertaining to the world,
God, and the universe, including how it functions. More importantly, it
tells us how we should live our lives and what we need to do to ensure
that we are aligning ourselves properly in preparation for the afterlife.
It is inspirational in its’ messages of love and truth. It is profound
knowledge that motivates one to be a better person and to fight to improve
oneself in all ways. If everyone was made aware of the truth in this
information, then the world would be a better place. (...)
Swedenborg has told us of the nature of one’s
life in eternity. Before, we had no idea of what the afterlife would be
like. But Swedenborg experienced it first hand and can tell us exactly how
things work there and what it will be like. This is very helpful
information and enables us to relieve some of the tension and anxiety we
may have felt about dying. (...)
It seems to me that people are becoming more
and more aware of the experiences of Emmanuel Swedenborg and they were
very inspired by them. People want to spread the information that they
have come across and many people do it just out of interest alone, but
many are also taking a more religious perspective on this. At the far end
of the spectrum, people like Dr. James are starting to see the more
scientific aspects of Swedenborg’s writings.
So, it looks like people first become interested in Swedenborg’s writings
simply because they present novel ideas, then they start to believe in it
in a religious sense, although only in a mystical way. Finally, they start
to realize the scientific truth in it, and they start to rationalize, and
finally at this point they are starting to see things in a spiritual way
like God intended. So you can see the progress of human understanding of
Swedenborg’s revelations. It is very interesting to watch these changes in
people indeed. (...)
www.soc.hawaii.edu/leon/459s2007/rupp/rupp-report4.htm
I have learned so much this past semester and
I appreciate it because I was not expecting to learn as much as I did. I
would have to agree with Bering that culture is a big factor in our
spirituality and that our behavior is a big factor in where we go after we
die. I will not take this class for granted because it has taught me how
to be a better person by reading articles from different people like
Swedenborg and Bering. I was always in the positive bias and now that I
was able to use that perspective in this class, it will always be in my
heart that I am a part of the positive bias. Science is everywhere and it
can be hard at times to learn in a class that is negative bias based. I
believe that God helps me through it and I am happy that I took a class
that was based on the positive bias. (...)
I can definitely see the differences in each
student’s reports about how they were first skeptical about taking this
class in the beginning and did not know what they were getting themselves
into. I can see the transformation of people being a part of the negative
bias in report one, and than seeing them start seeing that the positive
bias would actually help them get through this class. It was amazing
seeing students putting feedback in what they believe in spiritually
because this allows me to see where I am with God. I enjoyed reading the
other students reports because it actually gave me a better perspective
about how theistic psychology works. To be honest with you, I don’t think
I would be this far in the class if it was not for the students because
they have helped me outside of class with my reports. That is something I
will never take for granted. (...)
The main message that God is trying to tell us
in life is that we need to follow Him in order to conjoin with Him after
we die. He wants us to live a life of pure behavior so that we will not
spend an eternity in Hell. God does not like watching people go to hell
because they will be going through pain and death for eternity. He is
heart broken by this and wants everyone to see that He is the light. He is
a God like no other. He is not a god that is made out of gold and has to
have food presented towards it; He is a God that has all of the power in
the universe. He created the universe and every single one of us. He has a
plan for us and we have to listen to God for what that plan is and than
follow His path so that we can fulfill it. (...)
Theistic psychology has taught a lot about God
and I appreciated this class so much because I have never taken a college
course that was based on God! I will never take this class for granted and
I am looking forward to telling others about how God can save them and
that He has a plan for every one of them no matter what they are going
through. I am glad that I took this course and I hope that it will be
worth it for you too.
www.soc.hawaii.edu/leon/459s2007/sepkowski/sepkowski-report%205.htm
To see a list of student reports
in theistic psychology:
www.soc.hawaii.edu/leonj/theistic/index.htm#part2
To see the list of prior
generation student reports on their study of Swedenborg, see here:
www.soc.hawaii.edu/leonj/leonj/leonpsy/instructor/swedenborg.html#students
1.5.1.1
The Swedenborg Reports
Quoting from the Writings Sacred
Scripture:
CL 326. To this
I will append two narrative accounts [about Swedenborg's experiences in the
spiritual world]. Here is the first:
After the question concerning the soul had been discussed in the school and
answered, I saw the people going out in order, the headmaster in front, after
him the older men, with the five young men who had responded to the question
in the midst of them, and after them the rest. As they left the building, they
went around to the sides, where there were walkways surrounded by bushes. And
gathering there, they broke up into small groups, all of them circles of young
men conversing on matters of wisdom, with one of the wiser men from the
balcony in each.
Seeing them
from my place of lodging, I entered a state of the spirit and in the spirit
went out to them. And there I went over to the headmaster, who a little before
had posed the question concerning the soul.
When he saw me he said, "Who are you? As I watched you approaching on the way
here, I was astonished to see that one minute you would pop into view, the
next minute drop out of sight, so that one moment I would see you and suddenly
then not. Surely you are not in the same life-state as our people."
Gently laughing
at this I replied, "I am not a marionette, nor a chameleon, but I am one who
alternates, being sometimes in your light and sometimes not, so that I am an
alien and at the same time a native."
[2] At this the
headmaster looked at me and said, "These are strange and extraordinary things
you are saying. Tell me who you are."
So I said, "I
live in the world in which you once lived and from which you have departed,
which is called the natural world; and I live as well in the world into which
you have come and in which you are now living, which is called the spiritual
world. I am as a result in a natural state and at the same time a spiritual
one - in a natural state when I am with people on earth, and in a
spiritual state when I am with you. Moreover, when I am in a natural state, I
am not visible to you; but when I am in a spiritual state, I am. To be as I am
is something I have been given by the Lord.
"Being an
enlightened man, you know that an inhabitant of the natural world does not see
an inhabitant of the spiritual world, or vice versa. Therefore when I conveyed
my spirit into my body, you did not see me; but when I conveyed it out of my
body, you did.
"You also
taught in your school exercise that you are souls, and that souls see souls
because they are human forms. But you know that you did not see yourselves or
your souls within your bodies when you were in the natural world. This fact is
due to the difference that exists between something spiritual and something
natural."
[3] When he
heard me mention a difference between something spiritual and something
natural, he said, "What is the difference? It is not like the difference
between something more pure and something less so? So what is something
spiritual but a purer form of something natural."
But I replied,
"That is not what the difference is, but it is as the difference between
something prior and something subsequent, between which there is no finite
relationship. For the prior is in the subsequent, as a cause in its effect,
and the subsequent exists from the prior, as an effect from its cause. That is
why the one is not visible to the other."
To this the headmaster said, "I have reflected and ruminated on the
difference, but so far in vain. I would like to have some concept of it."
[4] So I said,
"You shall not only have a concept of the difference between something
spiritual and something natural, but you will even witness the difference."
Whereupon I spoke to him as follows:
"You are in a
spiritual state when you are with your own people, but in a natural state with
me; for you speak with your associates in spiritual language, the common
language of every spirit and angel, whereas with me you speak in my native
tongue. Indeed, every spirit or angel in speaking with a mortal person uses
the person's customary language, thus speaking French with a Frenchman,
English with an Englishman, Greek with a Greek, Arabic with an Arab, and so
on.
"So then, to
learn the difference between something spiritual and something natural in
terms of languages, do the following: Go over to your associates, say
something there and remember the words. Then with these memorized, come back
and repeat them to me."
So he did as I
said, and returned to me with the words in his mouth, but when he uttered them
he did not know what any of them meant. The words were altogether strange and
unfamiliar, being words not found in any language of the natural world.
After he
repeated this experiment several times, it became clearly apparent to him that
people in the spiritual world all speak a spiritual language which has nothing
in common with any language of the natural world, and that every person comes
automatically into use of that language after death. At the same time he also
then discovered that the very intonation of spiritual language is so different
from the intonation of natural language that the intonation of spiritual
language, even when loud, is not at all audible to a natural person, nor the
intonation of natural language to a spiritual person.
[5] After that
I asked the headmaster and some others standing by to go over to their
associates and write down some thought on a piece of paper, and with that
piece of paper come back to me and read it. They did as I said, and they
returned with the piece of paper in hand; but when they went to read it, they
were unable to make out what any of it meant, since the writing consisted only
of some alphabetic letters with curly lines over them, each of which carried
some meaning connected with the subject. (Because every letter of the alphabet
carries some meaning there, it is apparent from what origin the Lord is called
the Alpha and the Omega.)** As they again and again withdrew, wrote and
returned, they discovered that their writing included and contained a
countless number of elements which no natural writing could ever express. But
they were told that this is because a spiritual person thinks thoughts
incomprehensible and inexpressible to a natural person, and these cannot
descend or be put into any other form of writing or language.
[6] Then,
because the others standing by were unwilling to believe that spiritual
thought so far surpasses natural thought as to be inexpressible in comparison,
I said to them, "Try an experiment. Go over into your spiritual
association, think on some subject, and holding the thought come back and
express it to me."
So they went,
thought, held the thought, and came back; but when they went to express what
they had thought, they could not. For they did not find any natural mental
concept equivalent to any spiritual concept. So neither did they find any word
to express their thoughts, since ideas of 7the mind take form as words in
speech. At that they then began to withdraw and return, to prove to themselves
that spiritual ideas were higher than natural ones, being inexpressible,
ineffable and incomprehensible to the natural man. And because spiritual ideas
are so transcendent, they began to say that spiritual ideas or thoughts
compared to natural ones were the essences of ideas and the essences of
thoughts, and that they therefore expressed the essences of qualities and the
essences of affections; consequently that spiritual thoughts were the germs
and origins of natural thoughts. It also became evident from this that
spiritual wisdom was the essence of wisdom, thus unintelligible to any person
of wisdom in the natural world.
They were then
told from the third heaven that there is a still more interior or higher
wisdom, called celestial, which has a similar relationship to spiritual wisdom
as spiritual wisdom does to natural wisdom; and that these levels of wisdom
flow in succession in accordance with the heavens from the Lord's Divine
wisdom, which is infinite. (CL 326)
CL 421. To this
it should be added that men who from things visible in the world, have so
confirmed themselves in favor of nature that they became atheists, have been
seen by me in the spiritual world. Seen in spiritual light, their
understanding was open below but closed above, and this because in heir
thought they had looked downwards to the earth and not upwards to heaven.
Above their sensual, Which is the lowest part of the understanding, appeared,
as it were, a veil. With some it was flashing from infernal fire, with others
it was black as soot, and with still others, livid as a corpse. Let every one,
therefore, beware of confirmations in favor of nature. Let him confirm himself
in favor of the Divine; there is no lack of material. (CL 421)
CL 422. Some
indeed are to be pardoned for having ascribed certain visible things to
nature, in that they have not known anything about the sun of the spiritual
world where the Lord is, and about influx therefrom; nor anything about that
world itself and the state thereof, no, nor anything about its presence with
men. Thus they could not have thought otherwise than that the spiritual was a
purer natural, and that angels were either in the ether or in the stars; and
of the devil, that either he was man's evil or, if he actually existed, that
he was in the air or in the deep; and that after death the souls of men are
either in the inmost part of the earth or in some Ubi or Pu, until the day of
judgment; and other like notions which fantasy has induced from ignorance of
the spiritual world and of its sun. This is the reason why they are to be
pardoned who have believed that nature Produces her visible things from
something implanted from creation.
But those are
not to be pardoned who by confirmations in favor of nature have made
themselves atheists; for they could have confirmed themselves in favor of the
Divine. Ignorance does indeed excuse, but it does not take away the falsity
that has been confirmed, for this coheres with evil, and evil with hell.
(CL 422)
DeConjugio 2.
Since love truly conjugial is in its origin pure delight itself of the mind,
and that love is the fundamental of all loves, and from love is all the beauty
of the angels in heaven, for love or the affection of love forms everyone,
wherefore every angel is as to his face the image of his love or affection,
hence it is that all the beauty of the angels in heaven is from their
conjugial love; for the inmost of their life which shines through is thence.
An angel was seen by me, who was in pure conjugial love (he was from the third
heaven); such was his beauty that the bystanders were carried away with
admiration, saying that it was beauty itself in its essence. (De Conjugio 2)
Never in the history of science has such a report
surfaced.
How can we build a scientific theory or understanding of our major
human concerns if we have no access to data that might verify even the slightest
of our hypotheses? For example, the hypothesis that there is life after death
cannot be convincingly verified from any of the available data such as the
testimony of ancient scriptures or the recent interest in near death
experiences. NDEs (Near Death Experiences) are insufficient by themselves
as scientific proof of life after death because of their extreme limitation in scope. They
are mostly composed of the vision of lights and, occasionally, the appearance of ghostly
personalities or voices. Google NDEs and sample from the nearly half a million
sites, and you'll quickly get an impression of how strongly this idea has swept
through people's beliefs. Or you can also start with Wikipedia, which has
an entry with related links:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Near-death_experience
Psychic phenomena are also insufficient, even when reproducible -
and mostly they are not, because they are reported in trance or hypnotic states rather
than in the ordinary state of scientific or legal reporting. Thus questions about any
claimed psychic phenomenon cannot be discussed with the medium, who afterwards cannot
offer the simplest of accounts about the identity of the "spirits" they spoke to
or their life condition and environment.
By contrast I found a tremendous watershed of data about the spiritual world in the
Swedenborg reports. Over a period of 27 years, Swedenborg had observed thousands of people
go through the process of dying and entering the spiritual world -- a process he
calls resuscitation (see Section xx). He was able to interview
many whom he knew in the world as well as many celebrities he had known through their
books and from history. He witnessed their daily life activities in cities and houses, and
he participated in their festivals, public debates, and games. In the language of an
intelligent and observant explorer, he describes their customs, language, occupations,
and form of government. You might like to read from his book Heaven and
Hell, available online here:
Swedenborg, Emanuel. (1758) Heaven and its
Wonders and Hell From Things Heard and Seen. www.swedenborgdigitallibrary.org/contets/HH.html
Besides the wealth of unique information in the Swedenborg reports, what makes them
even more impressive to me is Swedenborg's unbroken consistency in tying all of the data
together into a scientifically acceptable account..
He presents a spiritual geography
of the mental world of eternity, whose coordinates coincide with the anatomy and
physiology of the body (see Section xx).
A map of the spiritual world would consist of a giant
Grand Human,
a composite of male and female anatomy. The psychological and moral character of
individuals in the afterlife of eternity projects an outer environment that corresponds to the
character and content of their mind.
Healthy and generous spirits coalesce in a telepathic
spiritual community that manifests itself in an agreeable and benign external environment. There are
cities "in the region of the hand", or in the region of the right eye, or the
bladder, and so on. The character or genius of each society in the spiritual world
reflects the physiological or anatomical function of the body part of the Grand Human
which marks their location.
Antisocial and pathological minds congregate in degraded
societies whose character corresponds to specific physiological malfunctions or anatomical
distortions. They coalesce into a map that pictures a Grand Monster.
This spiritual
geography is a remarkable aspect of the Swedenborgian scientific system. It describes an
empirical approach to the study of the mind and the afterlife since knowledge about the
functions and characteristics of the body allows confirmation of hypotheses about the
properties of the mind and about phenomena in the spiritual world. For more on
methodology in theistic psychology see Volume 5.
1.5.1.2
The Negative Bias in Science
Here is a representative article by a negative bias
psychologist, viewed on the Web in March 2006 at
www.bbsonline.org/Preprints/Bering-11302004/Referees/Bering-11302004_preprint.doc
To be published in Behavioral and Brain Sciences (in press) ©
Cambridge University Press 2006
The Folk Psychology of Souls
Jesse M. Bering
Department of Psychology
University of Arkansas Fayetteville, AR, 72701
jbering@uark.edu
www.uark.edu/depts/psyc/fbering.html
Abstract: The present article examines how people’s belief in an
afterlife, as well as closely related supernatural beliefs, may open an
empirical backdoor to our understanding of the evolution of human social
cognition. Recent findings and logic from the cognitive sciences contribute to
a novel theory of existential psychology, one that is grounded in the tenets
of Darwinian natural selection. Many of the predominant questions of
existential psychology strike at the heart of cognitive science. They involve:
causal attribution (why is mortal behavior represented as being causally
related to one’s afterlife? how are dead agents envisaged as communicating
messages to the living?), moral judgment (why are certain social behaviors,
i.e., transgressions, believed to have ultimate repercussions after death or
to reap the punishment of disgruntled ancestors?), theory of mind (how can we
know what it is “like” to be dead? what social-cognitive strategies do people
use to reason about the minds of the dead?), concept acquisition (how does a
common-sense dualism interact with a formalized socio-religious indoctrination
in childhood? how are supernatural properties of the dead conceptualized by
young minds?), teleological reasoning (why do people so often see their lives
as being designed for a purpose that must be accomplished before they perish?
how do various life events affect people’s interpretation of this purpose?)
among others. The central thesis of the present article is that an organized
cognitive ‘system’ dedicated to forming illusory representations of (i)
psychological immortality, (ii) the intelligent design of the self, and (iii)
the symbolic meaning of natural events evolved in response to the unique
selective pressures of the human social environment.
Keywords: causal reasoning; death concept; evolutionary theory;
existential psychology; folk biology; intelligent design; intentionality;
mental representation; teleological reasoning; theory of mind.
(...)
There is clear evidence showing that emotive factors can be powerful
contributors to people’s belief in life after death (e.g. Alvarado et al.
1995; Dechesne et al. 2003; Thalbourne 1996). In general, psychologists who
study this area have tended to focus on individual differences, specifically
the role of death anxiety, and have posited a variety of “comfort hypotheses”
involving the human motivation to construct such supernatural beliefs. In
contrast, less is known about the basic components underlying the strong
cognitive bias to entertain belief in an immortal soul (Astuti in press).
These more basic questions concerning the cognitive architecture behind
afterlife representations are also important pieces of the puzzle and will be
explicitly addressed in the present article. Whatever one’s personal
motivations for rejecting or endorsing the idea of an immaterial soul that can
defy physical death, the ability to form any opinion on the matter would be
absent if not for our species’ defining capacity to differentiate unobservable
minds from observable bodies (Povinelli & Bering 2002; Suddendorf & Whiten
1999; Tomasello & Call 1997).
(...)
In what follows, I examine how this human folk psychology of souls, as well
as closely related supernatural beliefs, may open an empirical backdoor to our
understanding of the evolution of human social cognition. Recent findings and
logic from the cognitive sciences contribute to a novel theory of existential
psychology, one that is grounded in the tenets of Darwinian natural selection.
The central thesis of the present article is that an organized cognitive
‘system’ dedicated to forming illusory representations of (i) psychological
immortality, (ii) the intelligent design of the self, and (iii) the symbolic
meaning of natural events evolved in response to the unique selective
pressures of the human social environment.
Psychological Immortality as a Cognitive Default
From an evolutionary perspective, it is important to first ask whether
humans “naturally” reason about death as a transitional state of consciousness
or simply acquire such ideas through cultural exposure (perhaps from adults
who “invent” such notions to ameliorate their own death anxiety, e.g. Dechesne
et al. 2003; Harris & Giménez 2005). Although conventional wisdom tends to
favor a general learning hypothesis for the origins of afterlife beliefs,
recent findings suggest a more complicated developmental picture.
(...)
Unfortunately, among cognitive scientists, scant attention has been paid to
the evolutionary significance of the human capacity to represent the self sub
specie aeternitatis (“under the aspect of eternity”). Instead, many scholars
categorize afterlife concepts in the same way they do other types of religious
concepts, as especially virulent strains of culturally transmitted ideas that
are highly effective at pirating core cognitive architecture (Atran 2002;
Boyer 2001; for an exception, see Baron-Cohen 1999). According to this
perspective, only the cognitive architecture itself can be the product of
natural selection; religious ideas are seen as simply being parasitic on this
evolved architecture—as nothing more than noise that shares a general
frequency between cultures (e.g. Pyysiäinen 2001; Sperber & Hirschfeld 2003).
For instance, in his book Religion Explained Boyer (2001:40) writes: “People
have religious notions and beliefs because they acquired them from other
people. On the whole, people get their religion from other members of their
social group.” Boyer and other cultural epidemiologists view afterlife
concepts, as well as other types of supernatural concepts, as unavoidable
carryovers of cultural selection.
Specifically, Boyer (2000, 2001) has argued that religious ideas exploit
information-processing mechanisms into paying attention to them because they
violate ontological regularities by hybridizing or transgressing natural
categories (see also Mithen 1996). Thus, religious ideas are especially likely
to attach to evolved cognitive templates that are designed for reasoning about
exemplars from natural categories — such as PERSON or ANIMAL — because these
templates act as flypaper for salient, “counterintuitive” cases (Atran &
Norenzayan 2004; Barrett 2000, 2004; Pyysiäinen 2001; Slone 2002; Sperber &
Hirschfeld 2003). According to Boyer (2003), then, a ghost is a person who is
without a physical body and as such is a conceptually seductive idea. The
concept of an afterlife therefore is easily generated and transmitted between
minds. Like all other religious concepts, however, it is otherwise treated as
a biologically sterile byproduct. Similarly, Sperber and Hirschfeld (2004:44)
write that, “explaining religion by a religious disposition lacks insight and
plausibility.” Instead, these scholars argue that religion is a non-adaptive
byproduct (i.e. a spandrel), one that arises through adapted human cognition
acting in concert with culturally migrating counterintuitive concepts that
change shape both within and between minds (for critical reviews, see Alcorta
& Sosis 2005; Bulbulia 2004 2005; Sosis & Alcorta 2003).
(...)
Experimental findings of prosocial behavioral change in light of
supernatural primes (e.g. Bering et al. 2005) also link up with the
ethnographic database concerning afterlife beliefs. In some religious
ideologies, the fate of the soul after death is determined by the social
behaviors of the individual during life. Reflections on the ultimate
consequences of (im)moral actions (e.g. whether the soul is expelled to Hell
or dissipated in nirvana) should be capable of exerting a causal influence on
today’s overt behavior, which would have the effect of preserving reputation
by encouraging the inhibition of selfish acts or facilitating self-control. In
the United States, for example, the majority (79%) of people believe that
there will come a day when God judges them and decides whether they will go to
Heaven or Hell (Gallup Organization 1999; see also Lester et al. 2002). For
current purposes, such poll data may actually be misleadingly low. What people
say they believe about the supernatural and how they implicitly reason are
quite different things (Subbotsky 1997 2001). Scientific knowledge about
causal relations between behaviors and consequences may therefore destabilize
this adapted system, but more by overriding supernatural beliefs than by
replacing them (McCauley 2000; Subbotsky 2001).
(...)
However, to understand the relationship between belief in gods or other
supernatural agents who are interested in our social behaviors and belief in
immortal souls requires that we disentangle several related strands of causal
reasoning. Consider that if God does not exist, then the unique self (i.e. the
individual “soul” of any given person) cannot be the product of intelligent
design; rather, it is simply the end product of standard machinations of
genetic and environmental recombination. If the soul is not the product of
intelligent design, then there is no teleological function that it is designed
to fulfill, no raison d’être to explain its existence beyond human
attributions of purpose. The task remains for cognitive scientists to
determine why the teleological position is so frequently adopted, and prospers
so vehemently, over the mechanistic alternative. The human mind cannot seem to
easily accommodate itself to a godless, evolutionary canon when it comes to
the self’s existence.
(...)
The categorical question “why am I here?” is important for evolutionary
analysis because it may set the stage for an obligatory social relationship
between the self and its presumed supernatural creator. If this cognitive
illusion, enriched with social affect, plays a causal role in generating
genetic fitness-enhancing responses (e.g. through the individual’s behavioral
compliance with moral norms which the creator is believed to have authored),
then an adaptationist hypothesis for the folk psychology of souls gains
support.
(...)
In this light, there is no emotionally invested God who favors or disfavors
the continued survival of the self. Consequently, whatever social contracts
previously entered into with this non-existent agent that led the self to
expect a reasonable deferment of death until old age are exposed as being
spurious. Avenues by which individuals may re-enter into this illusory
contract include just world beliefs (e.g. by reasoning that the person must
have been somehow deserving of death), and judging that the decedent was
different from themselves (and thus unlikely to have been in the same sort of
privileged social relationship with God) (e.g. Hafer & Bègue 2005; Lerner
1980; Lerner & Miller 1978; Pyszczynski et al. 1995). The fact that most
individuals do tend to re-enter into these illusory social contracts, even in
the face of seemingly egregious violations, suggests that the affective push
to do so is capable of overthrowing any rationalist weltanschauung. However,
if this is the expression of an evolved system, as the current model alleges,
then any explicit philosophical position that discards meaning is naturally
disadvantaged, because the self can no sooner “choose” to be a subjective
atheist than retinas can “choose” not to convert light energy into signals
that are carried to the brain by the optic nerve (Bering 2005; McCauley 2000).
Adapted psychological systems, by definition, determine the way that
information can be processed due to design solutions in the brain that were
engineered by natural selection. In the present case, just as we can close our
eyes to prevent light from being converted into neural signals, science may
provide a minority (i.e. nonbelievers) with the armamentarium to close their
eyes to the supernatural.
(...)
Because the adjudication of an afterlife of eternal reward or damnation is
seen as superseding “mere” human authority, people’s understanding of the
origins of moral deontology—what one ought and ought not to do in life—shows a
strong cognitive bias toward belief in a supernatural creator of human
morality (rather than, for instance, a bias toward belief in design by nature
or human whim). Reincarnation beliefs that rely on karmic principles are no
exception because such principles require an intelligent designer of this
morality based rebirthing cycle. This overall vein of reasoning helps to
explain why people expect divine retribution for moral transgressions only,
rather than, say, for breaches of social etiquette (e.g. Roes & Raymond 2003).
As Camus (1991) writes, “revolt against men is also directed against God”
(1991:94). From a genetic fitness perspective, what is important is that it is
moral transgression that scars reputation most deeply and has the most costly
effect on future social relations (Goffman 1963) and therefore behavioral
compliance in this domain is critically important. Surprisingly, cognitive
scientists who study religion have given the topic of morality relatively
short shift. For example, Atran and Norenzayan (2004) recently argued that
culturally acquired supernatural concepts (cf. Boyer 2001) receive emotional
staying power because they are lent support by an evolved hyperactive agency
detection device (see also Atran 2002; Barrett 2000; Guthrie 1993). According
to these authors, this mechanism serves the protective function of
hyper-vigilance in potentially dangerous environments, but as a consequence
affectively primes individuals and causes them to over-attribute intentions to
the natural world, such as might happen when a branch falls in the forest. The
authors conclude that “supernatural agents are readily conjured up because
natural selection has trip-wired cognitive schema for agency detection in the
face of uncertainty” (2004:720). In particular, supernatural attributions
occur because environmental stimuli “achieve the minimal threshold for
triggering hyperactive facial-recognition and body-movement recognition
schemata that humans possess” (2004:720).
(...)
Conclusion
In reviewing the available — though still very limited — evidence, there
are good conceptual grounds to argue that natural selection may have set to
work on specific human cognitive errors. These include simulation constraints
leading to Type I errors in reasoning about the afterlife, teleo-functional
errors leading to belief in the soul’s intelligent design, and theory of mind
errors fostering a belief that natural events were intentionally caused by
supernatural agents. The resultant cognitive system created the functional
illusion that the social behaviors of the self “mattered” outside of human
relations. As a consequence it became morally tamed under the auspices of this
existential rubric and therefore was less likely to engage in acts that, if
publicly exposed and harmful to one’s social reputation, seriously impaired
genetic fitness. The present article has also served to lay out some general
future directions for investigators to explore, in ever sharper detail, the
Darwinian mechanisms at the heart of the existential system outlined here.
Such work can further reveal how the standard architecture of ancestral human
minds was co-opted by natural selection to create the functional illusion of
an intelligently designed, immortal soul that was under nearly unbreakable
moralistic contract with the natural world.
http://www.bbsonline.org/Preprints/Bering-11302004/Referees/Bering-11302004_preprint.doc
(end of quote)
In contrast, here is are some quotes from the
Writings Sacred Scripture:
128. The worldly and bodily-minded man says at
heart, Unless I am taught about faith and about things that belong to faith by
means of sensory evidence so that I see for myself, that is, by facts so that
I understand for myself, I am not going to believe. And he confirms himself in
this attitude from the consideration that natural phenomena cannot be at
variance with spiritual. Consequently it is from sensory evidence that he
wishes to learn about heavenly and Divine matters. But this is no more
possible than for a camel to pass through the eye of a needle. The more he
wants by this method to become wise, the more he blinds himself, until in the
end he believes nothing, not even in the existence of anything spiritual or in
eternal life. This arises out of the basic assumption he makes. This is eating
from the tree of the knowledge of good and evil. And the more he eats of it,
the more dead does he become. But the person who wishes to be made wise not
from the world but from the Lord says at heart that he must believe the Lord,
that is, those things the Lord has spoken in the Word, because they are
truths. This is the basic assumption of his thinking. He confirms himself by
means of rational, factual, sensory, and natural evidence. And things that are
not confirmatory he sets aside. (AC 128)
AC 2568. [4] There are therefore two principles;
one of which leads to all folly and insanity, and the other to all
intelligence and wisdom. The former principle is to deny all things, or to say
in the heart that we cannot believe them until we are convinced by what we can
apprehend, or perceive by the senses; this is the principle that leads to all
folly and insanity, and is to be called the negative principle. The other
principle is to affirm the things which are of doctrine from the Word, or to
think and believe within ourselves that they are true because the Lord has
said them: this is the principle that leads to all intelligence and wisdom,
and is to be called the affirmative principle.
[5] The more they who think from the negative principle consult things
rational, the more they consult memory-knowledges, and the more they consult
things philosophical, the more do they cast and precipitate themselves into
darkness, until at last they deny all things. The causes of this are, that no
one can apprehend higher things from lower ones, that is, spiritual and
celestial things, still less Divine things, from lower ones, because they
transcend all understanding, and moreover everything is then involved in
negatives from that principle. On the other hand, they who think from an
affirmative principle can confirm themselves by whatever things rational, by
whatever memory-knowledges, and whatever things philosophic they have at
command; for all these are to them things confirmatory, and give them a fuller
idea of the matter.
[6] Moreover there are some who are in doubt before they deny, and there are
some who are in doubt before they affirm. They who are in doubt before they
deny are they who incline to a life of evil; and when this life carries them
away, then insofar as they think of the matters in question they deny them.
But they who are in doubt before they affirm are they who incline to a life of
good; and when they suffer themselves to be bent to this by the Lord, then
insofar as they think about those things so far they affirm. As this subject
is further treated of in the verses which follow,. it is permitted of the
Lord's Divine mercy to illustrate them more fully there (see n. 2588). (AC
2568.)
Contrast these two views in psychology, one from the
negative bias in science and from the positive bias in science. Ask yourself if the negative bias
perspective is proven adequately and scientifically, or whether it is an
unproven bias. On the other hand see how the positive bias in science is based on
Swedenborg's actual observations, not his assumptions or interpretations. This
will become even more clear to you as you acquire more information on what
Swedenborg is presenting in his reports.
Exercise:
Read the following excerpt from FaithFreedom.org.
Can you see how the author's argument is based on the idea that Sacred Scripture
in the literal sense cannot contain scientific revelations. However, can you see
how theistic psychology overcomes this problem because it is based on the
correspondential sense.
From:
http://www.faithfreedom.org/Articles/avijitroy/science_mirackes.htm
Nobel laureate Physicist Dr. Abdus Salam warned against people trying to
explain Big Bang using verses from Koran, saying that the current version of
Big Bang is the best known scientific explanation for the creation of the
universe. What if a better scientific explanation than Big Bang is found
tomorrow? Should the verses be changed to accommodate the new scientific view?
Religion can never vindicate or falsify
science. The truth or falsity of a scientific principle lies within science
itself. Religious scriptures cannot speak of any scientific principle.
Religious revelations are absolute directives and narratives for humans to
follow as faith unquestioningly. Many revelations clearly contradict many
accepted scientific principles. No scientist of any repute have ever tried to
substantiate scientific principles by religious beliefs. Most scientists and
theologicans would rather not mix faith with objective and rational field of
science. Koran/Bible/Gita etc are not
books of science. Any coincidental vague semblance between a verse and a
popular phrasing of a complex scientific principle is solely due to the very
general and vague wordings admitting of any interpretation that one chooses to
impose on it. All one needs is some vague reverse fitting argument to connect
the two. One can find Quantum Mechanics in Tagore's poems, or relativity in
the Buddhist Monk Nagarjun's writing. Just seeing what one likes to see
because of a preset belief in a favored belief system doesn't make it so by
any objective criterion. My purpose is not to disrespect religion or its
revelation, but to question the attempt to reconcile the two in an illogical
way. They can be irreconcilable and yet can continue and thrive as separate
ways as long as one does not get in the way of the pursuit of the other.
From:
http://www.faithfreedom.org/Articles/avijitroy/science_mirackes.htm
1.5.1.3
Outline of Swedenborg's Spiritual Psychology
(1) Swedenborg's Background
A biographical sketch would include dates and titles of many of his books, his dual
life in both worlds after age 57, his discoveries of inhabited earths in the universe from
conversations with those in the spiritual world who had come from those planets, and two
well known clairvoyant events -- the fire in Stockholm which Swedenborg described to those
present five hundred miles away and, the information Swedenborg relayed to the widow about
the lost payment receipt from her husband in the spiritual world). If you
google these topics you can find out more specific details. See also my
Swedenborg Web site for many links:
www.soc.hawaii.edu/leonj/leonj/leonpsy/instructor/swedenborg.html
(2) Life After Death: Heaven
Observational details and
explanations of Swedenborg's eyewitness reports of life in the
heavenly cities, including married life, conjugial bliss and sexuality,
quasi-omniscience of all knowledge, jeweled palaces,
instant food and clothing, and the education of children there.
(3) Life After Death: Hell
Observational details and
explanations of Swedenborg's eyewitness reports of life in the hellish cities,
including their horrible external appearance seen by those in heavenly light, their
obsessiveness and unwillingness to comprehend rational things, and their frantic desire to
return to the natural world and possess the inhabitants there.
(4) The Vertical Community
I use this expression to designate Swedenborg's extension of our understanding of community
to include an external social community in time-space on earth --
our "horizontal community" by which we have membership in ethnicity, culture,
religion, and society. Second, we have membership in an internal vertical community of spiritual consociations
with people in the afterlife of eternity. Our horizontal community is in
time-space so that physical geographical location often determines what our
social life is. But our vertical community is not in time-space, so physical
location of our body is not an issue. We consociate with the thoughts and
feelings of people in eternity whose thoughts and feelings are compatible with
ours. Incompatible thoughts and feelings separate and divide, while compatible
and similar thoughts and feelings consociate and unite, depending on the degree
of compatibility and similarity.
When you pass into the
spiritual mind through the resuscitation process, where you are and whom you see
and interact with, is determined by your thoughts and feelings.
This is why it's so important
to study theistic psychology, which is the knowledge revealed by God regarding
how we should prepare ourselves while we are here for a few brief decades, so
that we can live in conjugial heaven and bliss in eternity.
(5) Negative and Positive Bias in Science
The negative
bias scientist says, "I am a monist or materialist. If you claim that there is a spiritual
world, you're going to have to prove it before it can be accepted into science.
And furthermore, you would have to use a type of proof that is already
acceptable to science."
The
positive bias scientist says, "I am a substantive dualist,
which means that I accept the possibility that there are two worlds, one for the
spiritual body in eternity, the other for the physical body in time-space. Now let me investigate whether these
Swedenborg reports and claims have scientific validity."
Note that in the negative bias
thinking of science, a good scientific theory is one that leads to experiments
that help to disprove that theory. In psychology, good theories last about 10 to
20 years. After that the former theories are discarded as wrong and a new theory
takes place. A decade later, this is declared as wrong and a new one is
presented by someone that other scientists accept -- for a while. And this
continues as a process in all nontheistic sciences. Google "Thomas Kuhn"
to see how people discuss this topic today. Or, you can start with the Wikipedia
entry for him:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thomas_Kuhn
However, this is different with the positive bias sciences like theistic
psychology, in which all knowledge is extracted from Sacred Scripture by the
methodology of correspondences (see Section xx). This is not a "trial-and-error"
experimental methodology but a systematic rational translation of God's Speech
into modern science. Hence all established extractions in theistic psychology
remain forever valid and are not replaced by new extractions.
(6) No Function Without Substance.
This is where I present Swedenborg's scientific principle that there cannot be a
function without a substance. In the historical debate on the mind/body issue, the
materialistic scientist in the negative bias mode is forced by logic to deny the reality
of the mind since thoughts and feelings have no mass or extension. The negative bias
psychologist cannot account for such important human phenomena as awareness, imagination,
attachment to symbols, uniqueness of the self, the centrality of religious feelings, the
determining role of Divine Providence in the occurrences of history and accident, and
prophetic revelation. Swedenborg, as a representative of the positive bias psychologist,
has provided us with empirical facts and rational explanations for all these phenomena.
(7) The Swedenborg Reports as Science
Swedenborg's eyewitness reports pass stringent scientific criteria. The explanations
are rational and hold together as a system. His reputation was impeccable and his
observations were carried out for nearly three decades and repeated thousands of times
with quasi-experimental variations. You can consult a sample of these
observations and experiments listed in the Index Volume 18:
www.soc.hawaii.edu/leonj/theistic/#EXPERIMENTS
Meanwhile, his life in this world continued in the
public eye -- as a celebrity and frequent guest of the royal family, as active member of
Sweden's legislative body, as a government mining director and consultant
engineer, as an inventor, writer and publisher of
significant mining and navigational tools, and as a European traveler received by
renowned scientists and scholars. His rational system is useful in many areas of
psychology, including psychotherapy, education, humanistic and transpersonal psychology,
and psychobiology. See a more detailed listing in my article here:
James, Leon. (2001). Overcoming Objections to Swedenborg's
Writings Through the Development of Scientific Dualism. New Philosophy,
v. CIV n.3 & 4 pp. 153-217. Available at:
newphilosophyonline.org/journal/article.php?page=1027&issue=104b
Copy Available at:
www.soc.hawaii.edu/leonj/leonj/leonpsy/instructor/np98.html
(8) Swedenborg's Scientific Psychology
Death, dying, and the afterlife are topics that belong to biology and
psychology, not to religion alone. The Swedenborg reports are of interest to psychology as
a science. They empirically define the following concepts:
-
What is the spiritual world
of the afterlife in eternity
-
What is the
influence on us of spiritual associations through our choices and inheritance
-
What
is heavenly and infernal eternity
-
How
are people on earth obsessed by spiritual influences
-
What
are effective personal growth methods through a life of self-examination and reformation
-
What is revelation and
Sacred Scripture -- how it is made or given
-
How
do spiritual correspondences operate in thought, language, art, and science
-
How
do we explain the interconnection of all things in the universe to the mind
(see the topic of spiritual geography)
-
What is the
explanation for the impossibility of a vacuum (Swedenborg's conversations with Newton in the
spiritual world). Also: what is color.
-
What
are the mechanisms of inheritance of parental mental traits and how are
these inherited traits modified through reformation of
one's character
-
What
are the anatomical levels, layers, degrees, and operations of the mind (corporeal, sensuous, rational,
spiritual, celestial)
-
Explaining the analysis of all human behavior into affective, cognitive, and sensorimotor
domains ("love, thought, act" or "good, truth, use")
These concepts, together with many others found in the Swedenborg reports, constitute a
new paradigm in psychology, which we can call spiritual psychology or theistic
psychology. This psychology is
rational, dualistic, integrated, empirical, experiential, experimental, behavioristic, functionalist,
developmental, psychobiological, and revelatory.
The above list is a scientific
perspective. I omit the historically important development of the
New Church and its contemporary status. Google "New Church" to see some
of the activities going on today. The fact that
Swedenborg's Writings also serve as the basis for a new Christian religion is independent
of the fact that the Swedenborg reports are viewed here as biology and psychology
when this knowledge is extracted by means of correspondences (see Section xx).
The literal sense of all Sacred Scripture is the basis of religions,
but its correspondential sense is the extracted science of theistic psychology.
As a psychologist and scientist, I view Swedenborg's admission into the spiritual world
and subsequent dual life as an event that makes his position fully empirical and
scientific. His accounts of the soul and of correspondences turn from mere theory, prior to his admission into the spiritual world, to objective
eyewitness reporting of the spiritual world from age 57 to 84. Swedenborg's admission into the spiritual
world through the conscious awakening of his spiritual mind, and consequent dual life, advances his
reports from theology to empirical and
behavioral science.
Quoting from the Writings of Swedenborg:
CL
532. To this I will append the following narrative account:
I was once in my spirit taken up to the angelic heaven and into one of its societies;
and some of the wise there then came to me and said, "What news do you have from
earth?"
"This is new," I said, "that the Lord has revealed secrets which surpass
in excellence all the secrets previously revealed from the inception of the Church."
"What are they?" they asked.
I said that they were the following:
(1) That in the Word and in each and every particular of it, there is a spiritual
meaning corresponding to the natural meaning; that through that spiritual meaning people
of the church are conjoined with the Lord and affiliated with angels; and that in it lies
the holiness of the Word.
[2] (2) That the corresponding elements of which the spiritual meaning of the Word
consists have been disclosed.
The angels asked whether the inhabitants of the earth knew anything about
correspondences before. I said that they knew nothing at all of them. They have lain
hidden now for several thousand years, I said, namely from the time of Job. Among peoples
who lived at that time and before, a study of correspondences was the study of studies,
from which they had their wisdom, because they gained from it a concept of spiritual
things having to do with heaven and so with the church. But because that study was turned
into an idolatrous one, it was of the Lord's Divine providence so blotted out and lost
that no one has seen any trace of it. However, knowledge of it has nevertheless now been
disclosed by the Lord, I said, in order that people of the church may be conjoined with
Him and affiliated with angels. This conjunction and affiliation are effected through the
Word, in which each and every particular is a correspondent form.
The angels greatly rejoiced that it had pleased the Lord to reveal this great secret,
which for several thousand years had lain so deeply hidden. And they said it was done in
order that the Christian Church, founded as it is on the Word and being now at its end,
might be revived and again draw its spirit through heaven from the Lord.
They inquired as well whether in consequence of that knowledge it had at this time been
disclosed what baptism and Holy Supper symbolize, sacraments about which people have
hitherto had such various thoughts. And I replied that it had been disclosed.
[3] I said further, (3) that the Lord has now revealed the circumstances of people's
life after death.
The angels said, "What about life after death? Who does not know that a person
lives after death?"
"They know it and do not know it," I replied. "They say that what lives
after death is not the person but his soul, and that this lives on as a spirit, of which
they harbor an idea as of its being like the wind or ether, saying that it does not live
as a real person until after the day of the Last Judgment. At that time, they say, the
elements of the body which were left in the world, even though eaten by worms, mice and
fish, will be gathered together again and constituted once more into a body, and that it
is thus that people will rise again."
"What is this you are saying?" the angels said. "Who does not know that
a person lives as a person after death, the only difference being that he then lives as a
spiritual person? And who does not know that a spiritual person sees a spiritual person as
a material person does a material one, without their being aware of a single distinction,
except that they are living in a more perfect state?"
[4] The angels then inquired, "What do people know of our world, and of heaven and
hell?"
I said that they have known nothing, but (4) that the Lord has now disclosed the nature
of the world in which angels and spirits live, thus the nature of heaven and the nature of
hell; as also that angels and spirits live in affiliation with men; in addition to many
other wonders connected with them.
The angels were gladdened that it had pleased the Lord to disclose such things, so that
people would no longer suffer such ignorance as to be in a state of uncertainty regarding
their immortality.
[5] Going on, I said, (5) "The Lord has now revealed that there is in your world a
different sun from the one in our world; that the sun of your world is pure love, while
the sun of our world is nothing but fire; that because your sun is pure love, everything
that emanates from it brings with it something of life, while because our sun is nothing
but fire, everything that emanates from it brings with it nothing of life; also that this
is the origin of the difference between what is spiritual and what is natural, a
difference hitherto unknown which has also been disclosed."
It has been made known in consequence of this, I said, from what source the light comes
which enlightens the human intellect with wisdom, and from what source the warmth comes
which kindles the human will with love.
[6] In addition, it has been disclosed (6) that there are three degrees of life, and
consequently three heavens; that the human mind is divided into these degrees, and that
the human being thus corresponds to the three heavens.
"Did people not know this before?" said the angels.
I replied that they knew about greater and lesser degrees in a range, but nothing about
prior and subsequent degrees.
[7] The angels asked whether in addition to these disclosures anything else had been
revealed. I said that a number of other things had been, namely, (7) concerning the Last
Judgment; concerning the Lord, that He is God of heaven and earth, that God is one both in
person and in essence, in whom is the Divine trinity, and that He is the Lord; also
concerning the New Church about to be established by Him, and the doctrine of that church;
concerning the sacredness of the Holy Scripture; as also that the Apocalypse has been
revealed, nothing of which could have been revealed, not even in one little verse, except
by the Lord.
Included also is a revelation concerning inhabitants of other planets and concerning
other earths in the universe, I said; as well as many accounts and wonders from the
spiritual world, by which much else having to do with wisdom has been disclosed from
heaven. (CL 532)
CL 533. The angels rejoiced greatly at hearing
these reports; but when they perceived in me a sadness and began to inquire what reason I
had to be sad, I said that although these secrets revealed at the present time by the Lord
surpass in excellence and importance any concepts hitherto imparted, still on earth they
are regarded as worthless.
The angels were surprised at this, and they petitioned the Lord to permit them to look
down into the world; and on looking down, behold, they saw only darkness there.
They were then told to write these secrets on a piece of paper, and to let the paper
descend to the earth, at which time they would see a portent. So they did so. And lo, the
piece of paper with these secrets written upon it was let go from heaven, and as it
descended, while still in the spiritual world, it shone like a star. But as it floated
down into the natural world, the light disappeared, and the further it fell, the darker it
became.
Then, when the angels directed it into gatherings of people containing certain educated
and learned representatives from the clergy and laity, a murmur arose from many of them,
in which were heard the following words: "What is this? Is it of any consequence?
What does it matter if we know these things or not? Are they not creations of the
brain?"
Moreover, some of them appeared as though to take the piece of paper and to fold it,
roll it up, and unroll it with their fingers, in order to obliterate the writing; while
others appeared as though to tear it up, and some to try to trample it with their feet.
But they were kept by the Lord from such a wickedness, and the angels were commanded to
withdraw the paper and protect it.
After that, because the angels were saddened and thought to themselves how long this
would be the case, they were told, "For a time and times and half a time."
(Revelation 12:14) (CL 533)
CL 534. I afterwards spoke again with the
angels, saying that something else had been revealed in the world by the Lord. When they
asked what it was, I said, "Respecting truly conjugial love and its heavenly
delights."
"Who does not know," the angels said, "that the delights of conjugial
love surpass the delights of all other loves? And who cannot see that into some love have
been gathered all the blessings, felicities and delights that could ever be conferred by
the Lord, and that their receptacle is truly conjugial love, which is able to receive and
perceive them to a full sensation of them?"
I replied that they did not know this, because they did not go to the Lord and live
according to His commandments, refraining from evils as sins and doing good. For truly
conjugial love with its delights comes solely from the Lord and is given to those who live
according to His commandments. Thus it is given to those who are received into the Lord's
New Church, I said, the church that is meant in the book of Revelation by the New
Jerusalem.
To this I added that I was uncertain whether people in the world today would be willing
to believe that this love in itself is a spiritual love and thus stems from religion,
because they harbor only a fleshly idea of it.
At that the angels said to me, "Write about it and pursue the revelation; and
afterwards we will take the book you have written on the subject and let it descend from
heaven. Then we shall see whether the points it contains are received, including at the
same time whether people are willing to acknowledge that the character of this love is in
accordance with the religion in a person, spiritual in the spiritual, natural in the
natural, and merely carnal in adulterers." (CL 534)
CL 535. After that I heard a hostile murmur from
people below, and at the same time this cry, "Do miracles and we will believe!"
In response I asked whether these revelations were not miracles, and received the
reply, "They are not."
So I asked what miracles they meant, then, and was told, "Show us and reveal to us
things to come and we will believe."
But I replied, "Such knowledge is not granted from heaven, since to the degree
that a person knows things to come, his reason and understanding fall with his prudence
and wisdom into a state of passivity, become inactive, and are overthrown."
Again therefore I asked, "What other miracles shall I do?"
Whereupon I then heard the cry, "Do miracles like the ones Moses did in
Egypt!"
To that I replied, "Perhaps you will harden your hearts to them as Pharaoh and the
Egyptians did."
And they answered that they would not.
Again I said, however, "Swear to me that you will not dance around a golden calf
and worship it like the posterity of Jacob,* which they did within the space of a month
after they saw the whole of Mount Sinai ablaze and heard Jehovah Himself speaking from out
of the fire,** thus which they did following a miracle which was the greatest of all. A
golden calf in the correspondential sense is the pleasure of the flesh."
And the people replied from below, "We will not be like the posterity of
Jacob."
But at that I then heard this declaration to them from heaven, "If you do
not believe Moses and the prophets, which is to say, the Word of the Lord, you
will not believe as a result of miracles any more than the children of Jacob
did in the wilderness; neither any more than those others believed when they
saw with their own eyes the miracles the Lord Himself performed when He was in
the world."
For more narrative accounts by Swedenborg, google
"Memorable Relations" Swedenborg (use the quotes
as shown)
or, see the selected sample in Volume 18:
www.soc.hawaii.edu/leonj/theistic/#memorable-relations
1.6
Spiritual Psychobiology
Emanuel
Swedenborg (1688-1772) is the author of about two hundred serious scientific works on
anatomy, psychology, and natural science. These have been translated into English and
other languages from the original Latin by a steady though small number of Swedenborgian
scholars and followers of the life philosophy Swedenborg outlines and rationally
justifies. Some of the works are short
journal articles but there are also about fifty titles of full length books. One of these
runs to 12 volumes, another six volumes. Those who have surveyed these Writings are of the
near unanimous opinion that they present a holistic and coherent
account of human behavior and of the life after death.
What makes Swedenborg's approach particularly interesting
to psychology is that it is an early form of behaviorism, functionalism, and organicity.
Organicity is the premise that all functions of the mind must have a structural basis and
must work together synergistically. In other words, the mind is a mental organ,
not some epiphenomenon produced by the brain. This mental organ is not made of
physical matter but of spiritual substance, as shall be explained below (see
also Section 5.1).
A unique feature of Swedenborg's approach is that the structural components of the mind
are defined as "spiritual
substances" (see this article on dualism:
www.soc.hawaii.edu/leonj/leonj/leonpsy/instructor/gloss/dualism.html).
Spiritual substances originate and belong to the "spiritual world." When
we are born, we are born into two worlds simultaneously, the natural, which is physical
and temporary, and the spiritual, which is permanent (or 'eternal'). This
dual citizenship
is hidden from ordinary perceptions, but upon death of the physical body, the person
'resuscitates' or awakens in the spiritual body and then
lives
with others in that world for ever
(see Section 1.7). The individual
retains his or her appearance, personality, and memory of experiences and
skills. These and many other details are related by Swedenborg as eyewitness
reports from the "afterlife" or spiritual world.
Swedenborg asserts that when he was 57 and well into his scientific career
and public life, the Divine Human appeared to him face to face in a room while
he was having lunch alone, and appointed him to publish scientific reports of
the spiritual world.
Swedenborg's spiritual mind would be made conscious so that he could observe
and report what he saw and heard in the spiritual world. The Divine Human had
prepared Swedenborg's mind since childhood so that he could carry out this
universal mission to the human race. Never before in the history of our race has
such a process been put into operation by God. Now the time had come for the
human race on earth to be given scientific proof of the afterlife and of the
basic laws of correspondence by which God creates and manages the natural and
spiritual worlds. Swedenborg was greatly humbled by the appearance of the Divine
Human to his eyes. He accepted the Divinely appointed task with humility and
adoration.
For the next few months, Swedenborg underwent the process of becoming fully
conscious in both worlds through his natural mind and spiritual mind
simultaneously. Our spiritual mind receives sensory input from the spiritual
world while our natural mind receives sensory input from the physical or natural
world. Upon death and resuscitation, our natural mind is no longer operative
since it receives sensory input from the physical body, which is now gone. We
awaken from resuscitation fully conscious in the previously unconscious
spiritual mind. Swedenborg observed the resuscitation process of hundreds of
people and it always took place in the same way. He himself underwent the
process several times so that he may be able to understand it better.
The extraordinary and unprecedented case of Swedenborg is that he has his
spiritual mind made conscious, while he was still attached to the physical body
on earth. This has never happened before and the people in the spiritual world
were as astonished to see Swedenborg there, as the people on earth were, when
Swedenborg revealed publicly what was happening to him.
He quickly became adept at dividing his attention between the simultaneous
sensory input from the spiritual world and the natural world. He kept his new
mental state a secret for several years. He was able to have a conversation with
those in the spiritual world even as he was carrying out tasks and duties on
earth -- having lunch at the Royal Palace, making a speech at the legislature on
Swedish finance reform, or overlooking the printing of one of his numerous
publications in scientific journals. Swedenborg took copious daily notes
throughout the 27 years of his dual consciousness. He passed into the spiritual
world permanently in 1772 at age 84. He had maintained a furious pace of work
right up to the end, publishing his last work in 1771. His notes and writings
from age 57 to 84 have been translated in various languages over the past 200
years. They amount to about 30 volumes in English translation. They are called
the Writings of Swedenborg.
Swedenborg wrote his reports from the perspective of a noted and well
respected18th century scientist. He recorded the details of many things he
learned from the spiritual world of the afterlife, and its connection to this
life. Here are a few things Swedenborg tells about himself in a letter he wrote
just two years before he passed into the spiritual world permanently.
Quoting from one of his Autobiographical Letters:
I was born at Stockholm on the 29th of January in the year 1688.{2} My
father's name was Jesper Swedberg, who was bishop of West-Gothland, and a man
of celebrity in his time. He was also elected and enrolled as a member of the
English Society, for the Propagation of the Gospel; for he had been appointed
by King Charles XII Bishop over the Swedish churches in Pennsylvania, and also
over the church in London. In the year 1710 I went abroad. I proceeded first
to England, and afterwards to Holland, France, and Germany, and returned home
in the year 1714. 1 In the year 1716, and also afterwards I had many
conversations with Charles XII, King of Sweden, who greatly favored me, and in
the same year appointed me to the office of Assessor in the College of Mines,
which office I filled until the year 1747, when I resigned it, retaining,
however, the salary of the office during my life. My sole object in resigning
was that I might have more leisure to devote to the new office enjoined on me
by the Lord.
A higher post of honor was then offered me, which I positively declined,
lest my mind should be inspired with pride. In the year 1719, I was ennobled
by Queen Ulrica Eleanora, and named Swedenborg; and from that time I have
taken my seat among the nobles of the rank of knighthood, in the triennial
sessions of the Diet. I am a Fellow and member, by invitation, of the Royal
Academy of Sciences in Stockholm; but I have never sought admission into any
literary society in any other place, because I am in an angelic society, where
such things as relate to heaven and the soul are the only subjects of
discourse; while in literary societies the world and the body form the only
subjects of discussion. In the year 1734, I published, at Leipsic, the Regnum
Minerale, in three volumes, folio. In the year 1738 I made a journey to Italy,
and staid a year at Venice and Rome.
With respect to my family connections, I had four sisters. One of them was
married to Eric Benzelius, who subsequently became the Archbishop of Upsal,
and through him I became related to the two succeeding archbishops, who both
belonged to the family of Benzelius, and were younger brothers of Eric. My
second sister was married to Lars Benzelstierna, who became a provincial
governor; but these two are dead. Two bishops, however, who are related to me,
are still living; one of them, whose name is Filenius, and who is Bishop of
East Gothland, officiates now as President of the House of the Clergy in the
Diet of Stockholm, in place of the Archbishop, who is an invalid; he married
my sister's daughter: the other, named Benzelstierna, is Bishop of Westmanland
and Dalecarlia; he is the son of my second sister. Not to mention others of my
relations who occupy stations of honor.
Moreover, all the bishops of my native country, who are ten in number, and
also the sixteen senators, and the rest of those highest in office, entertain
feelings of affection for me; from their affection they honor me, and I live
with them on terms of familiarity, as a friend among friends; the reason of
which is, that they know I am in company with angels. Even the King and the
Queen, and the three princes, their sons, show me great favor: I was also
invited once by the King and Queen to dine with them at their own table, which
honor is generally accorded only to those who are highest in office;
subsequently the Crown Prince granted me the same favor. They all desire me to
return home; wherefore, I am far from apprehending, in my own country, that
persecution, which you fear, and against which in your letter you desire in so
friendly a manner to provide; and if they persecute me elsewhere, it can do me
no harm.
But all that I have thus far related, I consider of comparatively little
importance; for it is far exceeded by the circumstance, that I have been
called to a holy office by the Lord Himself, who most mercifully appeared
before me, His servant, in the year 1743; when He opened my sight into the
spiritual world, and granted me to speak with spirits and angels, in which
state I have continued up to the present day. From that time I began to print
and publish the various arcana that were seen by me and revealed to me, as the
arcana concerning Heaven and Hell, the state of man after death, the true
worship of God, the correspondential sense of the Word, besides many other most
important matters conducive to salvation and wisdom. The only reason of my
journeys abroad has been the desire of making myself useful, and of making
known the arcana that were entrusted to me. Moreover, I have as much of this
world's wealth as I need, and I neither seek nor wish for more.
Your letter has induced me to write all these particulars, in order that as
you say "ill-conceived prejudices may be removed." Farewell; and from my heart
I wish you all the happiness both in this world, and the next; which I have
not the least doubt you will attain, if you look and pray to our Lord. EMAN.
SWEDENBORG
For additional autobiographical comments Swedenborg makes in the Writings,
see Section 1.8.6.
Swedenborg continued to be productive in this world during his nearly three
decades of simultaneous life in
both worlds. Not only did he continue to publish both types of works -- natural
science and theistic science but he also continued for some years in his job as Royal Assessor of
Mines, an important engineering post in the Swedish government, and as well, continued to
be active in the Swedish House of Lords where he was author of several influential bills
on economy, the coinage system, alcoholism, and education. At
first his theistic science books were published anonymously. Later however, it was discovered
that he was the eminent author of a series of books on the afterlife of
immortality. From then on he spoke
openly of his experiences, even as he was continuing his busy public life. He
continued to receive people's admiration and respect.
Some critics express a general skepticism regarding Swedenborg's mental state
of simultaneous dual citizenship, which is unique claim in the history of science.
Critics admit that they
have had
difficulty processing Swedenborg's system in its entirety, given its quantity
and its theological topics. Their judgment is therefore based on their own
belief as to whether such a dual citizenship is possible, and not on the
objective scientific merit of Swedenborg's reports. By contrast, we get a totally sympathetic evaluation of Swedenborg
when the reviewers are familiar with his Writings as a totality, rather than from
selections or even from the collateral literature about Swedenborg written by
others, which is considerable. It is even less likely that a scientist today
would become so involved that he would study 30 volumes of one man's work. But I
did that. For the past 23 years I have studied the 30 volumes of the Writings,
using my skills as a research scientist in behavioral psychology, a field I was
trained in and have practiced for the past 44 years (see a list of my
publications here:
www.soc.hawaii.edu/leonj/leonj/leonpsy/leonpublish.htm ). You can see my
evaluation of the Writings by reading this work on theistic psychology.
It is interesting to note that a number of well known American
and
British writers, poets, philosophers, and influential thinkers have revealed in private letters, or in
their less well
known publications, the fact that they had read or studied Swedenborg's Writings,
and that they were greatly influenced by them. The list is quite long, but included among
them are Balzac, Berlioz, Blake, Conan Doyle, Emerson, Goethe, Victor Hugo, Henry
James, Sr., Jung, Helen Keller, Maeterlinck, J. F. Oberlin, E. A. Poe, Ezra
Pound, D. Suzuki, Yeats. Note the absence of any scientists in this
list!
Swedenborg's case is unique in the history of science. Recognized as one of the most eminent and
rational scientist of the Age of Reason in 18th century Europe, Swedenborg was very well
acquainted with the history of Western science, its grounding in empiricism, its
preference for formalism, and its negative attitude toward God as a concept in
science. It is within this
scientific skepticism that Swedenborg attempts to present his unique scientific
reports. He is
very well aware of the need to meet essential criteria of scientific inquiry; which
include coherence, consistency,
empiricism, experimentalism, and rationality
(see Section xx).
For additional arguments see my article on
"objections to
Swedenborg" available here:
www.soc.hawaii.edu/leonj/leonj/leonpsy/instructor/np98.html.
Whatever is already known in science must be taken into account by the newly
proposed system. The new scientific paradigm must be superior to the old in a
convincing and demonstrable way. The new paradigm is superior if it can explain
all the known facts that the current paradigm can explain, but in addition, can
explain other facts that the current paradigm cannot explain. This is how
scientific revolutions and paradigm shifts occur. I have observed at least two
major paradigm shifts in my 44 years of being a psychology professor and
researcher (see my autobiographical analysis in this article written in 1976,
five years before I started reading Swedenborg's Writings:
www.soc.hawaii.edu/leonj/499ss99/pun/ccp1.html ) (See also my
autobiographical analysis which I have written several years after I started
studying the Writings, available here:
www.soc.hawaii.edu/leonj/leonj/leonpsy/instructor/gloss/dhl3.html
Swedenborg
used all the anatomy and physiology of his day to specify the mindstructures or
mindorgans of the spiritual body. This was made possible by his astounding discovery
that the physical body is a functional effect of the spiritual body (see Section
5.1). We have a head because
the spiritual body has a head; we have circulation of the blood because the spiritual body
has circulation of the blood; and so on down to the most minute biochemical process in the
body and genetic structures. In the natural sciences Swedenborg anticipated genetics and neuroanatomy on the
biological side, and on the chemicalphysical side he anticipated nebular formation,
magnetism, and relativity. His biographers and followers assert that Swedenborg's
Writings
will only be mined fully in the future when science is ready to accept the concept of
the dual
universe.
Swedenborg's book Rational Psychology (published in 1742) introduces
a perspective on human behavior that anticipates the contemporary focus of American psychology.
It is consistent with the major schools of psychological thinking and method, as
represented by behaviorism, functionalism, gestalt, psychodynamic, and humanistic
psychologies. This unusual communality is not due to eclecticism but to an overlap in
fundamentals and basics of the scientific view of human behavior as it has
evolved consistently in two thousand years of Western scholarship, literature,
drama, philosophy, art, and science.
In its most general paradigm, rational psychology distinguishes between three
interconnected domains of human behavior. These are the will (affective organ), the understanding
(cognitive organ), and the sensorimotor effects of these two acting together.
The actions of the body correspond to these three domains of the mind.
Each domain of the mind consists of discretely different operations --
feelings, thoughts, and sensations. These mental operations are spiritual and
therefore distinct from the electro-chemical operations of the physical brain.
All operations in science must have a structural component or form in which the
operations are carried out. Neuronal operations in the brain have a structural
component in biochemical (protein) cells and components. Affective and cognitive
operations in the mind have a structural component in mental organs constructed
of spiritual fibers. Biochemical neurons in the brain are made of physical
matter and energy form the sun of the natural world where all bodies are born
and die. Mental neurons in the mind are made of spiritual substances from the
Spiritual Sun of the spiritual world where all minds are born and live to
eternity. Swedenborg's psychology was always connected to physiology and anatomy
(see Section xx). He was unique in proposing anatomical structures for the mind
defined as an immortal spiritual organ.
Swedenborg defines the chain of causation in behavior as
follows:
(motive) ORIGIN OF BEHAVIOR
(the Will) (affective domain)
(plan) CAUSE OF BEHAVIOR
(the Understanding) (cognitive domain)
(act) EFFECT OF BEHAVIOR
(the body) (sensorimotor domain)
The
motive and the plan are not in this world but in the spiritual world. The
spiritual world = the mental world. Modern
psychologists define the mind as insubstantial or an
epiphenomenon of the brain. Destroy the brain and you've destroyed the mind,
they say. However
Swedenborg argued on rational grounds that a function cannot exist in a vacuum
or be an epiphenomenon. There
must be an organic basis for all functional operations of the mind as well as of
the body. Seeing is not possible without an eye. Blood circulation is not
possible without heart and arteries. Swedenborg was
unwilling to call the mind an epiphenomenon. He took the other
scientific alternative which is that the mind is organic but of organic substances not
detectable by physical senses.
Considering the locus and essence of thoughts and
feelings prior to Swedenborg's dual consciousness at age 57, he postulated the existence of the spiritual world and our simultaneous
and functional dual citizenship. Years later his hypothesis was confirmed empirically when
he was introduced into the spiritual world and shown its reality. He then was able to talk
to several of his "dead" acquaintances as well as to a number of well known men of history
such as the Socratic group. Cicero, the Apostles, Luther, Leibniz, Newton, and many others. It
appears from his reports of these conversations that these people had similar views and
personality to those known about them in history. As well, Swedenborg was able to observe
that the shape of the spiritual world is that of the human body and mind. He visually
confirmed the observation when he was offered a bird's eye of the
multitude of inhabited lands and societies in the spiritual world. They are ordered into the shape and
structure of what he called "The Grand Man of Heaven." This makes sense
when you consider that the spiritual world = the mental world, and that the
mind's shape or anatomy parallels that of the body (see Section xx).
1.6.1
Three Levels of Behavior
Despite the variety of theories and methods in psychology there is a general overlap
among them, and this commonality may be taken as stable over the changing history of
schools of psychology. Consider for example the overlap between
Freud, Skinner, and Rogers, these three being the representatives of separate yet
widespread schools within twentieth century psychology. All three agree that affective
behavior is the key to understanding the individual.
Freud looks for motivational data about his
clients, in their memories, in their free associations, in the symbolism of their dreams,
and in the slips of the tongue in daily talk. Contemporary psychiatry also emphasizes gestures, style of
conduct, and influence of drugs. The clinical goal is to alter the individual's
affective states, moods, and drive level.
Skinner makes the process of reinforcement the kingpin of his behavioristic
technology. Reward schedules and the
management of available social reinforcers are the principal techniques of behaviorists
for modifying behavior. In other words, by controlling people's affective needs (= social
rewards), the behavior technologist brings about modification in behavior. The control of
affective needs is for both Skinner and Freud the key to the modification of
behavior.
The same may be said about Rogers whose concept of unconditional regard
specifies the affective behaviors between two people: whether one values the
other, whether they can honestly express feelings with one another, whether
there is acceptance of each other's wishes, and so on. The concerns of the
humanistic therapist or counselor clearly relate to the clients' affective
states or behaviors. So the affective or motivational domain of human
behavior has received a central focus in all of psychology.
The second area of overlap between the widely differing schools of psychology is the general principle that
cognitive behavior is an intervening or mediate
activity between the affective motive to act and the outward performance of any
act. Freud's
theory specified several areas of cognitive behaviors including the
unconscious, the subconscious, the ego, the super-conscious, and so on. Freud was clearly concerned with how
unconscious affective needs were transformed into cognitive obsessions and delusions.
Skinner gave the area of thinking a major role in his behavioristic programs of social
engineering. In his 1957 book Verbal Behavior a major chapter was devoted
to Thinking. This was defined as implicit or private verbal behavior, while verbal behavior was defined as behavior
that affects others through discourse. Skinner defined discourse as operants under the control
of social reinforcers. There is a general recognition in behavioral psychology that human affective
behaviors (as in "social reinforcers") are functionally connected to human cognitive behaviors,
which Skinner called implicit or private verbal operants.
In the case of Rogers, it is also clear that verbal
behavior in the form of discourse and gestures is the principal method by which affective
needs and habits are modified. Here too, the affective behavior is connected to the
cognitive behavior, as for example, the behavior of having a good opinion of someone.
The opinion or its content is the cognitive part, while the affective part is
the desire to have that opinion and wanting to defend it or to justify it. The
affective provides the motive, while the cognitive provides the content or plan.
The two must work together to produce any overt behavior or interaction. This
has been a generally accepted thesis in all of psychology.
Many labels are used for
cognitive behavior by the varying schools. psychodynamic schools use the terms
Behaviorist schools use various terms for cognitive behavior,
including
Rogerian and transpersonal psychologies use terms
for cognitive behavior that includes
-
cognitive
-
mental or ideational
-
thoughts
-
intellectual reflection
-
consciousness
-
identity
-
self
-
insight
-
problem
-
conflict area
-
head tripping
-
inner self
-
meditation
-
and so on.
It is clear then that psychologists in general agree that human behavior is directed
from the level of affective habits (or habitual affective states) and is thence
interconnected with a lower level of cognitive habits.
There is a third area of overlap, what is recognized by all as the level of sensorimotor
habits. Freudian analysts get paid for results; these effects of
therapy must by visible in the individuals' sensory or motor life.
For example, in therapy we seek for improvement in emotions and in thinking
pattern, which are affective and cognitive behaviors. But we also seek changes
in overt sensorimotor behaviors like the verbal statements we make about the self,
or the elimination of certain unwanted acts like drug abuse, or a reduction in general muscle tension; blood pressure,
or heart rate. These sensorimotor effects are used by all therapists and counselors to assess
the effectiveness of the therapy or the change occurring in the client.
Behaviorists and therapists
measure the sensorimotor effects of intervention programs, as for example:
It is clear that psychologists work with the practical idea that behavior is
organized in three levels; affective, cognitive, and sensorimotor. It is interesting to note here that this threefold schema for human
behavior was explicitly held by earlier thinkers, going back to Aristotle.
A notable
personage of the eighteenth century, Emanuel Swedenborg (16881772), has also catalogued human
behavior in these three levels and developed an extensive and integrated psychology based
on what he called the will, the understanding, and uses. The
"will" was
defined as the origin of affections, loves, motives, inclinations, and all impulses to
act. This clearly corresponds to what contemporary psychologists call affective behavior
(or motivational drives and goaldirection). The "understanding" was defined as all forms
of intellectual activity, reasoning, judgment, and rationality. This level clearly
corresponds with what we call today cognitive behavior or mental activity. Swedenborg defined
"uses" as the locus or vehicle whereby the will is satisfied.
For
example, we reach for the glass to drink it; this is the motive, goal, or impulse of the
will, or voluntary freedom. Affective behavior is the tendency to reach at certain
times, and not at other times. The cognitive behavior, or understanding, is the means or
method through which we accomplish the goal. Here, we process the environment
for suitable liquids which we know will quench our thirst. The sensorimotor
behavior consists of the habits we acquired in reaching,
timing, perception, etc. Swedenborg called this the "use" because it brings the
wanted liquid to our mouth. The sensorimotor use is the end result of the
affective impulse acting through the cognitive knowledge. It is the attainment
of the goal, which includes the sensations of drinking and getting satisfied.
1.6.2
Swedenborg's Laws of the Spiritual World
The question has been raised by Swedenborg's biographers (e.g., Trobridge) as
to why believe the matters this unique man has brought back to us from the other
world? Swedenborg scholars answer this question by pointing out three important
considerations.
First, that the system Swedenborg erected is entirely rational,
integrated, universal, with no
contradictions, and is capable of rationally explaining all the major theological, philosophical,
and scientific issues that have been debated since antiquity about God,
immortality, the afterlife, and the dynamic laws that connect the natural and
spiritual worlds. Second, that Swedenborg's reports of the spiritual
world are objective and systematic, based on his eyewitness observations and
field experiments in the spiritual world that he was able to conduct for 27
continuous years on a daily basis. He took careful and copious notes amounting
to 30 published volumes. He was a scientist of impeccable reputation and a
notable public life. Third, the system is entirely compatible with Western
scientific attitudes of empiricism, functionalism, and organicity. In fact,
Swedenborg's Writings anticipate major methodological issues that were
rediscovered a century later by scientific psychology and behaviorism. To give
but one example here, Swedenborg set a new scientific standard for dualism in
science, which I can express as "No function without substance and structure."
In other words, any concept referring to mental function (e.g., cognitive
operations) must be tied to the substance and structure of a spiritual organ.
For instance, a concept widely used today in neuroscience, cognitive,
science, and behavioral psychology is the definition of the mind as either
an "epiphenomenon" or a phenomenon that is " emergent" from the brain
operations. Neither of these popular concepts meet Swedenborg's more empirical
standard. Of course Swedenborg had access to direct observation of spiritual
substances and structures out of which the mental organs are constructed. In
contrast, neuroscience or psychology today does not even know yet that there
exists a substantive spiritual world with a Spiritual Sun which radiates mental
or "rational ether" substances out of which are constructed the mental neurons,
fibers, and networked connections that make up the human mind. Furthermore,
since neuroscience, cognitive science, psychology, behavioral medicine,
psychiatry -- are all lined up solidly behind the negative bias screen, there is
a built in tendency to reject out of hand all of the evidence Swedenborg brings
forth regarding the spiritual world and the substantive anatomy of the mental
organs )see Section xx). Nevertheless, I predict that in the ensuing years more
and more scientists will be willing to adopt the positive bias approach so that
eventually all of science will be in the positive bias in science, a development that will
bring great new benefits to humankind.
I myself have also examined the totality of Swedenborg's reports, which took
several years to accomplish, and found no internal or external contradictions or
inconsistencies.
The claim that the system is empirically and biologically based is also correct. Swedenborg was an
accomplished and well published scientist and public figure in Sweden in the18th century.
His expertise includes advances in anatomy, brain functions, perception, sensation,
instrument construction, metallurgy, chemistry, and astronomy, to name but a
few. It is because of the rational and objective character of his system that
enabled Swedenborgian ideas to have a strong influence on many thinkers of the
l9th and 20th centuries (see Section 1.5). However, there are no examples of
scientists who have incorporated his dualist concepts into normal science. I may
be the only one so far in 2004, but I can foresee the surge ahead in the
future...The future of science is theistic science and the future of psychology
is theistic psychology.
In his Ingersoll Lecture on the possible existence of immortality, delivered at the turn of the century
(1898), William James refers to a view held by "Swedenborgians"
system and attempts to show that the concept of survival of consciousness after death is
not contrary to scientific psychology, and especially, the accepted principle that
consciousness is a function of the brain. William James points out that there are
different types of
functional interdependence, as for instance, productive vs. transmissive. Steam is productively a function of the tea
kettle or other boiling apparatus; but the rainbow color stripe is transmissively a
function of the prism or other refracting medium. Or, power is a productive function of
the waterfall, but forced tonal air emerging from the organ with its characteristic sound
is a transmissive. function of the instrument. In a productive function, if you destroy
the means of production, you destroy the product; but in a transmissive function, if you
destroy the means of production, you do not destroy the product. A modern day example of
transmissive function is the relation between radio program and radio. Destroy the radio,
if you will, but the program still exists.
In today's perspective, the transmissive model can be recognized as a
correlational function between brain and mind, while the productive model can be
recognized as a a cause-effect relation between them. In neuroscience today it
is argued that the brain "causes" the "epiphenomenon" of mind and consciousness.
This is a productive model. All such models are materialistic and monist since
they equate mind and brain as belonging to physical matter, space, and time. But
the transmissive or correlational model is dualist since the brain is
constructed out of physical matter while the mind is constructed out of
spiritual substance (see Section xx). The materialist models require that the
mind vanish from existence when the brain is dead. The dualist model shows that
we are born into two worlds, the body organs in the physical world and the mind
or mental organs in the spiritual world. When the physical body dies, the mental
body is resuscitated in the spiritual world and lives on to immortality (see
Section xx).
William James refers to the dictum in physiological psychology that "thought
is a function of the brain." He points out that with this dictum one can
logically and scientifically be in either camp -- productive or transmissive. If
you espouse the camp that believes that thought is a productive function of the
brain (as most psychologists do), you must conclude that when the brain is
destroyed, so is thinking and feeling. You must deny that immortality can be a
scientific concept. However, if you espouse the camp that believes that thinking
and feeling are transmissive functions of the brain, then you must conclude that
immortality is a possible scientific concept. I may need to mention here that
William James, after giving this proof, then declares his personal predilection
to be in the productive camp. Nevertheless, the proof he presents is logically
correct.
William James reminds us that it is useful for
scientists to have theories that are acceptable to common sense and the rest of society. This
point is relevant today. For instance, though the majority of undergraduates indicate they
pray regularly, there is nothing they can find on praying in their psychology texts except
a ridiculing of it, as is the case with Skinner, who defined praying
as "superstitious behavior." There is a growing interest among American
psychologists in "religious issues" (an APA Division) as shown by an
increasing number of textbooks and periodicals. There is a renewed interest on
the part of clinical psychologists to adjust the process of therapy so that it
acknowledges the client's religious beliefs. This recognition in no way suggests
that clinical psychology acknowledges God as a real causal factor in therapy. It
only says that clinical psychology acknowledges the client's belief systems as
relevant to the course of therapy.
William James mentions the concept of "influx" held by
"Swedenborgians" which he interprets to mean that consciousness is the reception
of influx that comes down from God. The brain is merely a transmissive organ for
this consciousness, according to William James' speculation regarding the
meaning of influx in Swedenborg's Writings.
This
is the theory that natural forms limit the spiritual influx streaming into them from
within. This is analogous to the radio: the turning of the dial changes the state of
the condenser; in each state (indexed by a numbering system) the receptivity is different,
so that changing the condenser state alters the radio frequencies it is receptive to. The
radio wave system is in fact an inflow or input that is constantly present within the sphere of the
radio as objects; but this input is received differently depending of the state of the
radio components. Similarly, the brain is within a sphere whereby influx from the other
world within) constantly streams into it, but it receives parts of this influx in
accordance with the state in which the brain is, or the states of its component parts. As
William James puts it, "And when finally a brain stops acting altogether, or decays, that
special stream of consciousness which it subserved will vanish entirely from this natural
world. But the sphere of being that supplied the consciousness would still be intact; and
in that more real world with which, even whilst here, it was continuous, the consciousness
might, in ways unknown to us, continue still." (1898/1956, p.l8).
One serious problem with this analogy is that both the radio waves and the
radio components are physical in nature, while influx is not physical but
spiritual in substance. Spiritual influx cannot be received into the organ of
the physical brain but only in the organ of the mental mind, which is
constructed of spiritual substances. William James was evidently not familiar
enough with Swedenborg's Writings to realize this important fact which
Swedenborg repeatedly makes throughout the books of the Writings. Instead,
influx into the mind has a reactive response in the brain by correspondence
only. Hence it is that when the physical brain dies, the influx into the mental
organ continues uninterrupted to eternity.
I should mention this relevant fact. William James had been exposed by his father, Henry James,
Sr., to Swedenborg's
system of which Henry James was an ardent public defender (Beck, 1933). William
James was in charge of the posthumous publication of some of his father's
papers, and one of them was a book about Swedenborg! William James chose not to
incorporate Swedenborg's spiritual psychobiology in his influential textbook of 1897
on The Varieties of Religious Experiences,
In fact, he doesn't to mention Swedenborg in any of his numerous books,
articles, or essays, though he reviews the work of hundreds of authors, but
never Swedenborg. This avoidance makes sense when you consider that William
James' career was based on making a strong case for the new science of
psychology, in which he had become a world leader. He was politically motivated
to keep the science of psychology separate from philosophy, theology, or
religion. Talking about Swedenborg could have jeopardized his grand plan.
In the Preface to the Second Edition of Human Immortality,
William James is concerned about "many critics (who) have made one and the same objection to
the doorway to immortality which my lecture claims to be left open by the
'transmissiontheory' of cerebral action" (William James, 1898/1956). The objection is that
"if our finite personality here below, be due to the transmission through the brain
of portions of a preexisting larger consciousness, all that can remain after the brain
expires is the larger consciousness itself as such, with which we should thenceforth be
perforce reconfounded, the only means of our existence in finite personal form having
ceased." (Preface). The objectors feared that William James has thus eliminated the Christian
idea of immortality "which means survival in strictly personal form."
If you want to see his entire lecture, here is a copy of it (I highlighted in
red and blue font the paragraphs of special interest to our current topic):
www.soc.hawaii.edu/leonj/theistic/William-James-immortality.htm
Today,
there is a trend in the humanistically oriented new field of transpersonal psychology to
find it acceptable to contemplate the dissolution of personal life at death into the
"mothersea" (to qupte the old expression used by William James), and is even used in
counseling activities for the dying (Arkoff, 1984). William James, however, is intent on
satisfying the popular need for concepts that insure the personal survival of every unique
individual: "one may conceive the mental world behind
the veil in terms as individualistic as one pleases, without any detriment to
the general scheme by which the brain is represented as a transmissive organ."
(Preface).
Study Questions:
Week 11 Readings: Section 1.5.1 to 1.6.2
-
Student 1: 1, 4, 7
-
Student 2: 2, 5, 8
-
Student 3: 3, 6, 9
11.1.
(a) Summarize Section 1.5.1 "Students Speak Out on Swedenborg."
(b) Contrast the ideas of students in the History of Psychology earlier classes
vs. the ideas of students later in theistic psychology. What is the difference
in attitude and content?
(b) Give your impressions and conclusions of how students are doing in studying
and accepting theistic psychology.
(c) Relate your conclusions to your own study of theistic psychology thus far.
How do you fit or relate?
11.2.
(a) Section 1.5.1.2 "The Negative Bias in Science" presents an extensive quote
by a negative bias mode psychologist (Bering). Analyze what he says.
(b) Make a
conclusion in the light of what you already know from the positive bias
perspective in theistic psychology.
(c) How would your other professors this semester relate to the idea presented
in this class that nontheistic psychology assumes the negative bias in science? Would you
predict that they agree that it is a bias or not?
11.3.
(a) Select a few concepts from Section 1.5.1.3 "Outline of Swedenborg's
Spiritual Psychology." Make an outline of the entire argument.
(b) Which concepts are most interesting to you. Explain.
(c) Now present and explain the outline to a friend or two. Have a discussion
about it.
(d) What observations
can you make from this exchange?
11.4.
(a) Section 1.5.1.3 also contains a "narrative account" in which there is a
discussion with angels about what people on earth know about heaven and hell.
What is your impression of this?
(b) Give an interpretation of the account as best you can at this
point in your study of theistic psychology.
11.5.
(a) Summarize what is said in Section 1.6 "Spiritual Psychobiology."
(b) How does
this relate to what you already know about the field of psychology?
11.6.
(a) Study Section 1.6.1 "Three Levels of Behavior." Based on that discussion,
and your own limited knowledge of the field, explain the major differences
between non-theistic psychology and theistic psychology. You can also consult
other Sections, e.g., Section 2.3 "Is theistic psychology really science?" at
www.soc.hawaii.edu/leonj/theistic/ch2.htm#Q2
11.7.
(a) Discuss your answer of question 6 with a friend or two. Describe your
interaction.
(b) What is your
conclusion?
11.8.
(a) Discuss the "transmissive model" (or "transmission theory") of the mind by
William James in Section 2.3. He was familiar with Swedenborg's Writings from
his father, who wrote a book about Swedenborg's Writings.
(b) Do you see a connection between
substantive dualism and the model of William James?
11.9.
(a) Discuss your perceptions of how other students in this class (G26) are
adjusting intellectually to the positive bias perspective.
(b) Read some of their
reports. Do the reports show the same thing as the class discussions?
(c) How do you stand relative to others?
1.6.3
Criteria for a Scientific Theory in Psychology
Consider
Freud's theory of the structure of the self in terms of id, ego, and superego. Is it a scientific theory? In
general we would say that it is a scientific theory, though we might quickly add that it
is not a very thorough one since it cannot be empirically investigated. But how do we
know that Freud's theory is in general scientific? What about mental telepathy? What about
creationism? To distinguish between a workable scientific theory in psychology and one that is unworkable
by today's standards, we might evaluate each theory on the basis of these five criteria:
-
1. Organicity. The
proposed theory must be biologically grounded. In other words, no function
without structure, medium, or substance.
-
2. Objective Reality. The
facts of the proposed system must come from objective observation, and must
be verifiable by others.
-
3. Operational Definition.
The proposed theory must offer concrete measurement procedures for assessing
the magnitude of effects indexed by dependent measures under various known
independent conditions.
-
4. Empiricism: Every step
of the explanation or theory must be capable of being understood and
verified by the person's own experience or self-witnessing observations.
-
5. Usefulness: The theory must be applicable to all people and
beneficial to society and individuals.
Discussion of these five criteria now follows.
1.6.3.1 Organicity.
The proposed theory must be biologically grounded. In other words, no
function without structure, medium, or substance.
The APA approved licensing procedures for clinical psychologists certifies
that trained psychotherapists must have a sufficiently thorough knowledge in the
biological and medical sciences. This general practice shows the fact that
today's standards in psychology insist that psychological theories be
biologically based. Swedenborg's system meets this
requirement, and does so in a highly specific way unlike Freud whose
Id/Ego/Superego structure had but vague biological definitions based on the
analogy of a plumbing system in the mind. Swedenborg was the recipient of
training by the finest European anatomists of the 17th and 18th centuries and
used this knowledge in the system he erected. Swedenborg's books on the brain
and the sensory predate by a hundred years the work of Fechner and Wundt on
sensation and perception.
The difference between psychology and philosophy , what makes psychology a
science, is that mental functions have an organic operation. Without this bottom
line requirement psychological theories would be like science fiction or the
theater. In psychology, sensations, thoughts, and feelings, must be
defined as operations or processes. Any operation must have a sphere, field,
medium, or locus of movement, repetition, and change. In order for light
(function) to travel between two spots it must have a medium of displacement.
like space, a gas, a liquid, or a tube. In order for In order for a car to move
(function) it must have an engine (medium, structure) capable of using a
source of energy. In order for people to pay their income tax (function) there
must be a filing form (structure) provided by the government. Similarly, mental
functions like problem solving (cognitive) and feeling attracted to something
(affective), must have a medium in which these operations take place in
appropriate sequences and hierarchies.
Two types of answers have been given regarding this medium in which mental
operations take place. One answer is materialistic and monistic, the other is
dualist or substantive. The answer from monism is popular today in neuroscience
and cognitive science. It says that conscious awareness of feelings and
thoughts, thus of being a human self, is an "epiphenomenon," thus not something
real, not something having its own real independence -- like the picture of
yourself in the mirror is not real compared to your face. So the conscious self
that each of us is familiar with is an "emergent phenomenon" resulting from the
neuro-chemical firings taking place in the neurons of the bran. Although these
neuro-chemical firings can be measured by various techniques today, all one gets
by this techniques is a measure, pattern, color, or number, not a feeling or
thought. To equate the number or color pattern with the feeling or thoughts is
called reductionism, and is one of the consequences of the negative bias in
science.
But with the positive bias of substantive dualism, as demonstrated in
theistic psychology, the standard requirement for scientific objectivity can be
restored to the concept of the mind and the spiritual world. We know from
Swedenborg's reports that mental operations are visible in the spiritual world
of the afterlife (see Section xx). It is common for people there to look at
someone approaching and perceive whether the individual is friendly or hostile,
honest or tricky, and what others they are in contact with. This is accomplished
by observing the color and pattern of operations that are visibly flashing in
various areas of the head and body.
Swedenborg defined the mind as a spiritual organ constructed out of the
spiritual substances streaming forth from the Spiritual Sun in the spiritual
world. all human minds are born in the spiritual world and as the individual
grows in mental age, the natural mind is being formed out of the spiritual
substances in its environment of "rational ether." Rational operations in the
cognitive organ is what we call "thinking." These rational operations are
reactions to the influx of spiritual light, a substance streaming forth from the
Spiritual Sun. At the same time spiritual heat from this sun enters into the
affective organ, which reacts by correspondence and creates the consciousness of
feeling.
Swedenborg's descriptions are so consistent and detailed that anatomy charts
can be prepared based on them. An excellent such attempt may be seen in Section
xx which presents Burnham's diagrams.
Theistic psychology is a biological science. Substantive dualism makes it
into an empirical science. Theistic psychology specifies a mental anatomy and
mental physiology that constitute a spiritual psychobiology. In fact, the
neuronal networks of the brain and their patterns of firing are governed by the
laws of correspondences. This means that the brain activity merely reflects the
mental neurons and their networks of operation in the mind. The spiritual
physiology of mental organs is primary while the natural physiology of the brain
is secondary or reactive to it by the laws of correspondence that specify the
functional interactions between the spiritual and natural worlds.
Feelings and thoughts are actual operations in the affective and cognitive
organs of the mind. The primary category for affective operations is selfish vs.
altruistic (or hellish vs. heavenly), and the primary category for thinking, is
truth vs. falsified truth (or rational vs. irrational).
1.6.3.2. Objective Reality.
The facts of the proposed system must come from objective observation, and
must be verifiable by others. .
Freud's psychodynamic concepts are usable by scientifically oriented
psychiatrists because they help organize the observations about one's clients.
Many of the clients' behaviors can be labeled using these concepts. In this
sense, Freudian theory is empirical and objective, and discussible by
practitioners as a common reference system. This makes it part of normal
science, even if the concepts cannot be operationally defined and experimentally
manipulated. In contrast, the case of ESP phenomena like telepathy or
clairvoyance, has been less successful with scientists despite the heavy
emphasis on the experimental approach in ESP research. The difficulty has been
practical. The ESP behavior effects are so small that they are inconsequential
for practical purposes.
A substantial proportion of scientific research in psychology has been
polemic or controversial. Researcher A comes up with a new technique or concept.
Researchers B, C, and D publish critical articles, failing to replicate the
results of researcher A. Then, researchers E and F publish an article confirming
the results of researcher A. More researchers join the hunt for the true facts
and provable effects. When you examine a research area in psychology that spans
two or three decades, you will find substantial amounts of such back and forth
arguments about whether a proposed effect is real or not. This is "normal
science" and is typical of how science progresses over decades -- see Thomas
Kuhn's well known concept and book on The Structure of Scientific Revolutions
(1962). Google.com
gives you thousands of interesting hits if you search for this title along with
the author's name.
Swedenborg's reports present facts and observations that are as objective as
an eyewitness field report gathered in the notes of Ph.D. candidates doing their
dissertations in anthropology, linguistics, geology, biology, architecture, or
culinary art. All those who were present also saw the same facts he saw. they
were objective events like something somebody says, or something that appears in
the surroundings, or what a group of debaters are talking about, etc. In 27
years of daily explorations in the spiritual world, Swedenborg had made many
companions whom he could consult with or interview, or act as assistants in his
experiments. Everyone present was able to see what Swedenborg saw and reported.
It is the case that Swedenborg could not invite assistants or colleagues
still living on earth to corroborate what he could see and what those could see
who were already in the spiritual world of their afterlife. This is a barrier
that cannot be overcome by employing some special methodology. We understand
from theistic psychology why other scientists are not allowed to have dual
consciousness like Swedenborg. But every scientist will have the opportunity of
verifying Swedenborg's data and experiments as soon as they are resuscitated
into the spiritual world, a few hours after they lose connection with their
physical body.
Swedenborg's system is based on a universal law between the natural and spiritual
worlds called "the law of correspondences" (see Section xx). Waldo Emerson, the founder of
transcendentalism in the 19th century, had heard of Swedenborg's idea of
correspondences between natural effects and spiritual causes. He was apparently
delighted at the idea of a living symbolism between nature and the
transcendental world of spirit. But he did not read enough of Swedenborg's
Writings to realize that the correspondences Swedenborg discussed were not his own
symbolic interpretations of the symbolisms of nature viewed from a poetic
perspective. And so Emerson changed the
correspondences to suit his own fancy or aesthetic ideas. But of course
correspondences are not someone's subjective symbolism. There is a universal law
that fixes all correspondences between natural phenomena as effects and
spiritual phenomena as causes.
1.6.3.3. Operational Definition.
The proposed theory must offer concrete measurement
procedures for assessing the magnitude of effects indexed by dependent measures under
various known independent conditions.
This is where Freud's rich theories did not do well in the long
run. His system is sometimes ridiculed by behaviorists. At any rate, it is to be
noted that when Freud's theories, or parts thereof, were redefined to permit
operational definitions, the result was quite fruitful in research that is of
acceptable standards, as for example the work of Adorno et. al. in The
Authoritarian Personality, or the use of the Rorsach Ink Blot Test to
measure abnormal emotions.
Swedenborg was both a product and an architect of modern science. He
was not only an anatomist and physiologist, but an instrument maker, engineer,
metallurgist, and legislator influential in economic monetary policy. His
precise professional training and job demands required operationalizing his
ideas into rock bottom precision. When he received access to the spiritual
world, he specified both the specific forces that tie the two worlds together
and the transition stages that allow each individual person to go from this
temporary life into a preexisting eternal life. Over and over again he presents
the observations he made over a 27year period concerning how long it takes
between death of the physical body and resuscitation or regaining of
consciousness in the spiritual world. He described the attendant conditions to
the resuscitation process, who is present, what role they play, what are
people's reactions when they wake up, what they take from here to there in terms
of knowledge and attitude, and many other things described in great detail and
precision.
All of Swedenborg's descriptions of the laws of correspondences are given as
operational definitions. He frequently makes use of equivalence formulae such as
"A equals B" or "A signifies B" or "A represents B." A and B are always
independently defined so that the A element is always natural while the B
element is always spiritual, mental, or psychological (see Section xx).
1.6.3.4. Empiricism:
Every step of the explanation or theory must be capable of being understood
and verified by the person's own experience or self-witnessing observations.
One
of the special aspects of Swedenborg's empiricism is that every step of his
account or explanation is intended to be understood and
verified by the person's own experience or self-witnessing observations. This is not the case with
many other psychological theories since they tend exclude self-awareness as
subjective rather objective. When it comes to people's feelings and thoughts,
this attitude raises the sociomoral and political issue of whether someone else
can accurately tell you about your own feelings, affections, motives, and
thoughts. These "private" events are unavailable to psychologists, and therefore
they cannot tell you objectively what you are thinking or feeling, or even, what
the quality of your feeling and thinking is.
Behaviorism was historically a reaction against the objectivity of
self-monitoring, which a hundred years ago used to be called "introspectionism"
(see for example Titchener). Despite this, the science of psychology grew mostly
through data based on self-monitoring. They include personality tests, verbal
inventories, interviews, case histories, attitude scales, and multiple choice
questions about one's mood, emotions, and thoughts. The science of psychology
would not exist were it not for its heavy reliance on people's self-monitoring
of their feelings, thoughts, and interests.
Swedenborg insisted on
this type of empirical verification by readers prior to their acceptance of any
idea or principle he presented. He championed the rational approach to
government, philosophy, science,
theology, religion, and instruction. He fought against dogmas of religion. His
empiricism was impeccable having succeeded in proving what thousands of brilliant Bible
scholars were unable to do for a thousand years before him. With the use of his own system
of crossreferences of Bible verses Swedenborg proved that the language of the Bible
is written in correspondences that are uniform and integrated across the Old and
New Testament books, despite their having been written independently by dozens
of writers over hundreds of years. When the correspondences are analyzed, the
literal historical meaning (the natural A elements) disappear, replaced by their
spiritual counterparts (the B elements). And these spiritual elements turn out
to be scientific descriptions of the human mind -- its anatomy and functional
operations.
1.6.3.5. Usefulness
The theory must be applicable to all people and beneficial to society and
individuals.
Theistic psychology is the knowledge extracted from the Writings of
Swedenborg. Its comprehensive topical structure is proof of the many uses,
extensions, and applications of the knowledge contained in the Writings (see the
Overall Table of Contents).
1.6.4
The Organic Basis of All Phenomena
Swedenborg specifies the organic basis of death and the afterlife. In sketchy form we
can say that we are born into two worlds, the spiritual and the natural, with two bodies,
one for each world, and in which we exist and grow simultaneously. Prior to
death our awareness or conscious self is centered entirely in the natural body, and
upon death, the natural body ceases to function and disintegrates, while the spiritual
body now becomes the center and focus of our awareness. Subjectively, the person upon
death experiences waking up in vaguely familiar surroundings with some initial feelings of
amnesia and field dependent focus. After a few days, however, as the person walks around
in the new social and external world, there is a dawning realization that one is now in
the spiritual world. Swedenborg reports that most people are shocked to discover that the
afterlife is so similar in outward appearance and inner feelings to this life. This
impression changes, however, as the person's stay in the other world matures and evolves
according to the laws of the spiritual world.
The first aspect of this part of the theory that needs to be pointed out is that it
does not violate any behavioristic assumptions and standards. The other world is not
ghostly or abstract or ephemeral or transpersonally oceanic and alien to what we already
know as rock bottom individual personality, habit, and memories. Of course some have
accused Swedenborg of insanity, though his biographers point out that during the 27 years
that Swedenborg collected and wrote about data from the other world, he continued to
publish scientific articles and books, and continued his job as government Assessor of
Mines and parliamentary legislator with bills to his name on economic reform and other
practical matters. He retained his reputation unblemished by the unsupported and ignorant charge
of insanity, mental impairment, or psychosis and etc. (see Trobridge; Acton).
1.6.5
The Method of Psycho-Biological
Correspondence
Quoting from Swedenborg's work
Divine Love and Wisdom (DLW)
385. By means of this correspondence many arcana relating to the will and
understanding, thus also to love and wisdom, may be disclosed. In the world it
is scarcely known what the will is or what love is, for the reason that man is
not able, by himself, to love, and from love to will, although he is able as
it were by himself to exercise intelligence and thought; just as he is not
able of himself to cause the heart to beat, although he is able of himself to
cause the lungs to respire. Now because it is scarcely known in the world what
the will is or what love is, but it is known what the heart and the lungs are,
--for these are objects of sight and can be examined, and have been examined
and described by anatomists, while the will and the understanding are not
objects of sight, and cannot be so examined--therefore when it is known that
these correspond, and by correspondence act as one, many arcana relating to
the will and understanding may be disclosed that could not otherwise be
disclosed; those for instance relating to the conjunction of the will with the
understanding, and the reciprocal conjunction of the understanding with the
will; those relating to the conjunction of love with wisdom, and the
reciprocal conjunction of wisdom with love; also those relating to the
derivation of love into affections, and to the consociation of affections, to
their influx into perceptions and thoughts, and finally their influx according
to correspondence into the bodily acts and senses.
These and many other arcana may be both disclosed and illustrated by the
conjunction of the heart and lungs, and by the influx of the blood from the
heart into the lungs, and reciprocally from the lungs into the heart, and
therefrom through the arteries into all the members, organs and viscera of the
body.
386. (6) Man's mind is his spirit, and the spirit is the man, while the
body is an external by means of which the mind or spirit feels and acts in its
world. That man's mind is his spirit, and that the spirit is the man, can
hardly enter the faith of those who have supposed the spirit to be wind, and
the soul to be an airy something like breath breathed out from the lungs. For
they say, How can the spirit, when it is spirit, be the man, and how can the
soul, when it is soul, be the man? They think in the same way of God because
He is called a Spirit. This idea of the spirit and the soul has come from the
fact that spirit and wind in some languages are the same word; also, that when
a man dies, he is said to give up the ghost or spirit; also, that life
returns, after suffocation or swooning, when the spirit or breath of the lungs
comes back.
Because in these cases nothing but the breath or air is perceived, it is
concluded from the eye and bodily sense that the spirit and soul of man after
death is not the man. From this corporeal conclusion about the spirit and
soul, Various hypotheses have arisen, and these have given birth to a belief
that man after death does not become a man until the day of the last judgment,
and that meanwhile his spirit remains somewhere or other awaiting reunion with
the body, according to what has been shown in the Continuation concerning the
Last Judgment (n. 32-38). Because man's mind is his spirit, the angels, who
also are spirits, are called minds.
390. (7) The conjunction of man's spirit with his body is by means of the
correspondence of his will and understanding with his heart and lungs, and
their separation is from non- correspondence. As it has heretofore been
unknown that man's mind, by which is meant the will and understanding, is his
spirit, and that the spirit is a man; and as it has been unknown that man's
spirit, as well as his body, has a pulse add respiration, it could not be
known that the pulse and respiration of the spirit in man flow into the pulse
and respiration of his body and produce them. Since, then, man's spirit, as
well as his body, enjoys a pulse and respiration, it follows that there is a
like correspondence of the pulse and respiration of man's spirit with the
pulse and respiration of his body, --for, as was said, his mind is his spirit,
--consequently, when the two pairs of motions cease to correspond, separation
takes place, which is death. Separation or death ensues when from any kind of
disease or accident the body comes into such a state as to be unable to act in
unison with its spirit, for thus correspondence perishes, and with it
conjunction; not, however, when respiration alone ceases, but when the heart's
pulsation ceases.
For so long as the heart is moved, love with its vital heat remains and
preserves life, as is evident in cases of swoon and suffocation, and in the
condition of fetal life in the womb. In a word, man's bodily life depends on
the correspondence of its pulse and respiration with the pulse and respiration
of his spirit; and when that correspondence ceases, the bodily life ceases,
and his spirit departs and continues its life in the spiritual world, which is
so similar to his life in the natural world that he does not know that he has
died. Men generally enter the spiritual world two days after the death of the
body. For I have spoken with some after two days.
391. That a spirit, as well as a man on earth in the body enjoys a pulse and a
respiration, can only be proved by spirits and angels themselves, when privilege is
granted to speak with them. This privilege has been granted to me. When questioned about
the matter they declared that they are just as much men as those in the world are, and
possess a body as well as they, but a spiritual body, and feel the beat of the heart in
the chest, and the beat of the arteries in the wrist, just as men do in the natural world.
I have questioned many about the matter, and they all gave like answer. That man's spirit
respires within his body has been granted me to learn by personal experience. On one
occasion angels were allowed to control my respiration, and to diminish it at pleasure,
and at length to withdraw it, until only the respiration of my spirit remained, which I
then perceived by sense.
A like experience was granted me when permitted to learn the
state of the dying (as may be seen in the work on Heaven and Hell, n. 459). I have
sometimes been brought into the respiration of my spirit only, which I have then sensibly
perceived to be in accord with the common respiration of heaven. Also many times I have
been in a state like that of angels, and also raised up into heaven to them, and being
then out of the body in spirit, I talked with angels with a respiration in like manner as
in the world. From this and other personal evidence it has been made clear to me that
man's spirit respires, not only in the body but also after it has left the body; that the
respiration of the spirit is so silent as not to be perceptible to man; and that it
inflows into the manifest respiration of the body almost as cause flows into effect, or
thought into the lungs and through the lungs into speech. From all this it is also evident
that conjunction of spirit and body in man is by means of the correspondence of the
cardiac and pulmonic movement in both.
392. These two movements, the cardiac and the pulmonic, derive their origin and
persistence from this, that the whole angelic heaven, in general and in particular, is in
these two movements of life; and the whole angelic heaven is in these movements because
the Lord pours them in from the sun, where He is, and which is from Him; for these two
movements are maintained by that sun from the Lord. It is evident that such is their
origin since all things of heaven and all things of the world depend on the Lord through
that sun in a connection, by virtue of form, like a chain-work from the first to outmosts,
also since the life of love and wisdom is from the Lord, and all the forces of the
universe are from life. That the variation of these movements is according to the
reception of love and wisdom, also follows.
394. FROM THE CORRESPONDENCE OF THE HEART WITH THE WILL AND OF THE LUNGS
WITH THE UNDERSTANDING, EVERYTHING MAY BE KNOWN THAT CAN BE KNOWN ABOUT THE
WILL AND UNDERSTANDING, OR ABOUT LOVE AND WISDOM, THEREFORE ABOUT THE SOUL OF
MAN. 394. Many in the learned world have wearied themselves with inquiries
respecting the soul; but as they knew nothing of the spiritual world, or of
man's state after death, they could only frame theories, not about the nature
of the soul, but about its operation on the body. Of the nature of the soul
they could have no idea except as something most pure in the ether, and of its
containing form they could have no idea except as being ethereal.
But knowing that the soul is spiritual, they dared not say much about the
matter openly, for fear of ascribing to the soul something natural. With this
conception of the soul, and yet knowing that the soul operates on the body,
and produces all things in it that relate to its sensation and motion, they
have wearied themselves, as was said, with inquiries respecting the operation
of the soul on the body. This has been held by some to be effected by influx,
and by some to be effected by harmony.
But as this investigation has disclosed nothing in which the mind anxious
to see the real truth can acquiesce, it has been granted me to speak with
angels, and to be enlightened on the subject by their wisdom; the fruits of
which are as follows: Man's soul, which lives after death, is his spirit, and
is in complete form a man; the soul of this form is the will and
understanding, and the soul of these is love and wisdom from the Lord; these
two are what constitute man's life, which is from the Lord above; yet for the
sake of man's reception of Him, He causes life to appear as if it were man's;
but that man may not claim life for himself as his, and thus withdraw himself
from this reception of the Lord, the Lord has also taught that everything of
love, which is called good, and everything of wisdom, which is called truth,
is from Him, and nothing of these from man; and as these two are life, that
everything of life which is life is from Him.
395. Since the soul in its very esse is love and wisdom, and these
two in man are from the Lord, there are created in man two receptacles, which
are also the abodes of the Lord in man; one for love, the other for wisdom,
the one for love called the will, the other for wisdom called the
understanding. Now since Love and Wisdom in the Lord are one distinctly (as
may be seen above, n. 17-22), and Divine Love is of His Divine Wisdom, and
Divine Wisdom is of His Divine Love (n. 34-39), and since these so go forth
from God-Man, that is, from the Lord, therefore these two receptacles and
abodes of the Lord in man, the will and understanding, are so created by the
Lord as to be distinctly two, and yet make one in every operation and every
sensation; for in these the will and understanding cannot be separated.
Nevertheless, to enable man to become a receptacle and an abode of the
Lord, it is provided, as necessary to this end, that man's understanding can
be raised above his proper love into some light of wisdom in the love of which
the man is not, and that he can thereby see and be taught how he must live if
he would come also into that higher love, and thus enjoy eternal happiness.
But by the misuse of this power to elevate the understanding above his proper
love, man has subverted in himself that which might have been the receptacle
and abode of the Lord (that is, of love and wisdom from the Lord), by making
the will an abode for the love of self and the world, and the understanding an
abode for whatever confirms those loves. From this it has come that these two
abodes, the will and understanding, have become abodes of infernal love, and
by confirmations in favor of these loves, abodes of infernal thought, which in
hell is esteemed as wisdom.
396. The reason why the love of self and love of the world are infernal loves, and yet
man has been able to come into them and thus subvert the will and understanding within
him, is as follows: the love of self and the love of the world by creation are heavenly
loves; for they are loves of the natural man serviceable to spiritual loves, as a
foundation is to a house. For man, from the love of self and the world, seeks the welfare
of his body, desires food, clothing, and habitation, is solicitous for the welfare of his
family, and to secure employment for the sake of use, and even, in the interest of
obedience, to be honored according to the dignity of the affairs which he administers, and
to find delight and refreshment in worldly enjoyment; yet all this for the sake of the
end, which must be use For through these things man is in a state to serve the Lord and to
serve the neighbor. When, however, there is no love of serving the Lord and serving the
neighbor, but only a love of serving himself by means of the world, then from being
heavenly that love becomes hellish, for it causes a man to sink his mind and disposition
in what is his own, and that in itself is wholly evil.
397. Now that man may not by the understanding be in heaven while by the will he is in
hell, as is possible, and may thereby have a divided mind, after death everything of the
understanding which transcends its own love is removed; whereby it comes that in eves-one
the will and understanding finally take one. With those in heaven the will loves good and
the understanding thinks truth; but with those in hell the will loves evil and the
understanding thinks falsity. The same is true of man in this world when he is thinking
from his spirit, as he does when alone; yet many, so long as they are in the body, when
they are not alone think otherwise. They then think otherwise because they raise their
understanding above the proper love of their will, that is, of their spirit. These things
have been said, to make known that the will and understanding are two distinct things,
although created to act as one, and that they are made to act as one after death, if not
before.
Swedenborg gives full theoretical attention to the issue of the biology of the
spiritual body. We may use the term spiritual psychobiology to refer to the details
he works out concerning the operation and development of the spiritual body. First, we may
note that the two bodies are functional relations of each other in anatomical detail and
in neurophysiologic operations. In fact, the theory asserts that not a single cellular,
glandular, or hormonal activity in this body is possible without the simultaneous
accompaniment of the equivalent activity in the other body. It is asserted that the other
body takes precedence in determining the sequence of events in this body. For instance,
suppose the other body is suddenly surrounded and invaded by the close contact of a group
of people in the other world.
This interpersonal proximity sets up a communication flow of
cognitive and affective reactions between the people and you. As a consequence, the
neurophysiologic states of your spiritual body is altered in specific ways corresponding
to the character of the group of people that surrounded you. Streams of affections and
cognitions are received by each appropriate organ of the spiritual body. Swedenborg gives
a great deal of detail here (running to the tune of several volumes!) and relates these
interpersonal effects in the other world to individual effects in this body, such as
specific diseases and mental malfunctioning. Thus, we can say according to this system,
that our physical and mental functioning in this natural body is the consequence of the
psychosocial environment of the spiritual body. Bad company in the other world causes
disturbances in this world. See a related article on
Swedenborg's
contributions to modern psychological concepts.
A behaviorist at this point would demand an explanation of how such a connection is
operationally carried off. We do not accept magical forces or vacuous operations.
Swedenborg supplies us with detailed rational and biological and cosmogenic details
regarding the substances of which the universe is made of, and their lawful or orderly
interdependence. Not a single natural or psychological fact or event can have an exception
to this rule. Here is where Swedenborg's extraordinary originality and ingenuity shows up
well. He presents an evolutionary view of the world being one of the first scientists
after Newton to propose a theory of galactic evolution of suns and planets. According to
this theory the spiritual sun came first into being through an act of Divine creation and
all other created things came into being through the natural action of this spiritual sun.
As the particles of spiritual substances stream out of this eternal sun, they become
denser and denser through changes in their motion or vibration, and solidify into
atmospheres of increasing solidity and material density. Swedenborg specified nine
atmospheres, the primary being thin atmospheres which he called love and wisdom, and the
succeeding ones being heat, light, ether, air, and solid matter.
This is one of the most difficult and challenging aspects of the theory since
behaviorists are not used to thinking along a substantial or organic composition for human
emotions, feelings, thoughts, ideas, and intentions. Today behaviorism is still plagued by
the archaic view that feelings and thoughts are epiphenomena corresponding to chemical
reactions in the nervous system and the body. For example, the famous JamesLange theory
of emotions, and its contemporary counterpart as the Shachter view of emotions in social
psychology, is that emotions are nothing
else than the physiological reactions in the body and their conscious sensation. We are
not used to be told that emotions and feelings and thoughts are made of their own stuff,
that they are real and concrete and substantial, and that they are not merely epiphenomena
arising from the natural chemicals. Swedenborg system asks to reverse the view and say
that the stuff of feelings and thoughts is substantial and exists within its own sphere of
organized neurophysiology.
According to this theory, the original stuff that streams out
of the spiritual sun is twofold: affective and cognitive. These two substances cool down
and become denser, in which state they appear as heat and light of the natural sun, and
eventually they appear as chemicals. Thus, chemicals are nothing but affections and
cognitions cooled down, slowed down, and solidified. The physiology of emotions thus
partakes of how affective and cognitive reactions in the spiritual body come down and
solidify as neurochemical reactions in the natural body.
Swedenborg's cosmogony specifies that these two elementary substances of love and
wisdom (affect and cognition) exist eternally in the spiritual sun and are an infinite
source for the creation of ever new worlds and ever increasing numbers of humans
throughout the universe.
The interpersonal basis of the other world is firmly established by Swedenborg's
psychology, sociology, and history, which together may be given the title of spiritual
geography. It is remarkable that Swedenborg's descriptions of the other world are
continuous with our familiar experience in this world, namely, ethnic varieties of people
as we know them here, identifiable according to their religious beliefs, their styles of
dress and housing, their customs and form of government, their ideals and attitudes
towards work, science, recreation, and humor. Of course, this makes the whole system more
acceptable since it offers full continuity with this world. At the same time there are
significant differences.
For one thing, the language is universal, everyone speaking in
their own language subjectively, but interpersonally, it is heard as an automatic
translation into a universal thoughtlanguage by the brain of the spiritual body. Of
course, this lingua franca does not insure good communication among varieties of
cultures since these do not harmonize in their affective and cognitive habits. Swedenborg
reports that new arrivals in the other world are frequently met by dead relatives or
spouses and these live together for a while until they discover that they are
incompatible effectively and cognitively, at which point they if they are compatible, they
tend to cohabitate.
One of the new peculiarities new arrivals have to adjust to is the
spatial law in the spiritual world whereby similarity of affect produces proximity of
ecology. Swedenborg reports that in the other world a storm is produced, with thunder and
lightning and wind, when people of clashing affections get together, which sometimes
occurs for special purposes, he himself having witnessed such stormy battles in the other
world. This law that interconnects affective and cognitive operations within the
individual, and external ecological events of nature, is one of the striking features of
life in the other world according to Swedenborg. He observed changes in plants, gardens,
trees, clouds, and animals surrounding families he was visiting that occurred when he also
perceived a change in the affections and attitudes of the inhabitants. This he also
observed geographically, so that certain thoughts and intentions create instant deserts or
jungles with dangerous animals that appear to attack to hapless thinker. Swedenborg
reports that the art of fantasy and hypnotherapy is practiced extensively in the other
world so that there is a constant struggle going on there between good and evil
affections, true and false cognitions.
The law of the spiritual world is such that evil
forces allied to false reasoning create a downward sphere or draft through which the
people adhering to these affections and thoughts are pulled lower and lower, until they
come to reside in underground, cavernous holes, where they pursue in perennial
semidarkness ever more restricted and specialized interests in a single overriding
affection or lust, eventually turning into a kind of subhuman beast wallowing in one
repetitious and endless sensation. The laws of the other world are such that those who
adhere by preference and free will to upward moving drafts of affections, gradually find
themselves in ever more beautiful surrounds, and ever richer and deeper feelings of
contentment, fulfillment, and creative expression. The individual lives of people who make
it a daily habit to be kind, altruistic, and useful become heavenly and filled with never
ending intellectual and affective adventures in the eternal world.
The happiness and
creativity of these people in their heavens exerts a strong human sphere of influence that
extends down into the minds of people living on the earths of the universe. This heavenly
sphere enters the individuals' life on earth through ideas and strivings, Similarly, a
strong and contrary sphere of influence emanates from the deep hells of human experience
and invade us upward; they are felt in our violence, greed, pride, and desire to dominate
others at all cost. And so, our past and future are interconnected through these spheres.
It will be pointed out below how these extraordinary and remarkable observations of the
other world are applicable to our concerns in therapy and education. The connection lies
in the fact that the spiritual world is within time/space/matter, hence the here
and now of our life in the natural body can be better understood and hence, better
modified.
1.6.6
Applications of Swedenborg's System
One of the first questions we want to pose with regard to this theory is how does it
explain better than other theories the things we are actually interested in. Table 1
mentions some authors that have shown a distinct interest in psychology towards extended
notions of monistic and materialistic biology. When we compare these attempts to
Swedenborg's massive system we may be struck by their puerile attempts, their
selfacknowledged ineptness in a dark area, their humiliation in front of an
enormous task dimly perceived and for which they have a total lack of tools to prosecute.
They bring together speculation, bold guesses, edited myths and parables from foreign
lands, and symbolism's interpreted hesitantly. In contrast to this attitude Swedenborg
presents nothing but eyewitness news seen in brilliant light and sophisticated
instrumentation.
This is of course the difference between intellectual constructions based
on reasonings and the reality and ease of a blow by blow description of a traveler or
experimenter. The comparison is not fair because the outcome is disproportionate, and this
outcome was made possible by Swedenborg's extraordinary intermission into both
worlds for the last 27 years of his long life (16881772). Some have speculated that
Swedenborg's feat is replicable and that he is only the first of a new evolutionary
interconnection between our two bodies. Psychologist Van Dusen is also of the opinion that
there could take place a breakdown of the normal cleavage in awareness between our two
bodies (Van Dusen) and has proceeded upon this assumption with many of his clinical
patients who appear to be psychologically plagued by the presence of tyrannical people
from the other world who succeed in obsessing the patients through their affections and
thoughts.
Once we choose to identify with or internalize a particular affection or thought we
establish a permanent association with a spiritual society in the other world that
specializes in this type of affection or thought (for more discussion, see a related
article on vertical
community). For example, when a person staunchly believes a creed, dogma, or
constitutional statement, we may say that this person loves the ideals and
states contained in the statement. When this love is internalized and shows the
characteristic of being persistently chosen and intensely pursued, the person
comes into the chronic sphere of influence of a society in the other world from
whom this sphere of interest and striving emanates.
Thus we see such phenomena as the mass societies of Iran and Iraq where
millions of people act together in frenzied zeal under the maniacal influence of
violence and hatred against each other. This maniacal influence can be broken
only when the people involved voluntarily begin to change their spiritual
associations, that is, their religious beliefs and persuasions. To engineer such
a change from the outside, the world community would have to find elements in
their belief system which are connected to spiritual societies of a different
bend of affect and cognition. There may in fact be places in the Koran and
ancillary Islamic doctrines which urge the faithful to be peaceful and tolerant.
As these other aspects of their own religion receive greater attention and
interest, their spiritual bodies begin to be extirpated from the hateful drafts
or spheres of affective influence, and begins to rise to higher places in the
spiritual world where it comes under the draft or affective influence of loving
and wise societies, and when this new sphere of influence begins to be chosen
more and more by the people and their leaders, their bodies and minds will be
filled with altruistic and peaceful intentions toward one another.
Unfortunately, we have no control over which way they choose.
Swedenborgian principles of rational psychology are based on an observed reality, and
hence are capable of extension and application to an indefinitely large number of
situations. A Swedenborgian technology of behavior is now possible and much needed in
Skinnerian circles who have been left behind by the flights of humanism and
transpersonalism. Others will have to contribute to this task and it is possible to give
here only a few preliminary details. Table 2 provides one example of an approach to this
extension work, and Table 2 provides a more specific application to driving behavior.
1.6.7
Behavioral Consequences of Swedenborg's System
From the behaviorist point of view Swedenborg's system may be labeled an
organicrational psychology with an empirical operationalism for
phenomenological reality. This may appear a complicated method but when looked at
practically, it will be seen to be a natural continuation and extension of contemporary
functionalist views in both behaviorism and cognitivism. The functionalist pragmatism of
William James, grounded in physiological psychology, and surrounded as it was by
William James'
Christian traditionalism and his inclination toward transcendentalism, comes closest to
reflecting the psychology of Swedenborg's system. Since William James has remained acceptable to
both behaviorists and humanists (MacLeod, 1969) it will be seen that Swedenborg as well
will be acceptable to both factions. The first, and most difficult, step for the
behaviorist desiring this attempt is to thoroughly understand and work out in one's mind
the concept of duality.
Prior attempts exist in psychology but they have not been
found generally acceptable; after all is said and done the behaviorist remains unmoved by
the argument. In a way this testifies to the sincerity and persistence of the behaviorist
not to be hoodwinked into philosophical issues from which psychology had to escape after
centuries of polemics. Yet because of this very sincerity the behaviorist is compelled to
examine the evidence for some new claim which appears genuine, especially if this new
claim is continuous with its own felt solidity in biology and statistics. Swedenborg's
definition of duality is unlike any offered before in the history of psychology.
This duality is simply the actual reality of two interconnected bodies, one composed of
natural substances and the other composed of spiritual substances.
Swedenborg's proposed duality for psychology is thus organic and empirical rather than
spiritistic and phenomenological. It does not exclude phenomenology and humanism; on the
contrary, he emphasizes the human aspects of the universe, the human goals of love
and wisdom, good and truth. But he insists that all humanism of good and truth, of will
and understanding, must be grounded in good old earth, in the ultimate of chemical
substances and evolutionary growth through environmental reinforcement. In this rock
bottom attitude Swedenborg can be easily be claimed by the behaviorist as a founding
father antedating Wundt, Watson, and Skinner.
But all won't be that easy. This is because, unlike Swedenborg, none
of us can be conscious of our two bodies! However lamentable this state of affairs may
appear to be we must now decide whether, because of this, we can afford to ignore the
whole thing. I for one, want to wave the flag in front of my colleagues to draw their
attention to this gold mine of information about human behavior. For granted that we don't
have access to the same information as Swedenborg did, may it not be the case that the
information his observations have accumulated could be of great service to us if we found
a way of making behavioral deductions from them?
Take for example the following observations Swedenborg
made about the behavior of our spiritual bodies in the other world.
1. Individuals there cannot think by themselves but only in groups.
2. No one can lie there, i.e., think one thing and say another.
3. External environmental features are functionally related to internal affective and
cognitive states.
4. Similarity of affective states brings interpersonal co-presence.
5. Intelligence and power in the other world are functions of good uses acquired in
this world. "Good uses" are actions performed for the sake of others rather than
self only.
5. In the other world the insistent denial of truth causes insanity.
6. There are no degenerative diseases and death in the other world, but there are
deformations and nonfunctioning elements. For example, antisocial feelings and attitudes
produce a deadening of the senses, a darkening of the field of vision, and a general cold
invades and slows the body. By contrast, altruistic and sociable feelings and intentions
generate warmth and a quickening of all bodily functions and uses.
7. In the other world every individual feels compelled to act out their feelings and
thoughts. Under these conditions, the person soon evolves a clear hierarchy of motives by
which the person is ruled. It is easy, Swedenborg reports, for others to predict your
behavior as soon as they know and see your motivational or affective hierarchy. A person's
"ruling love," or chief drive and motive in life, shows in the person's facial
expression, body posture and appearance, and matching verbal behavior.
8. Growth in the other world amounts to the continuous and never ending exploration or
deepening of the packet of affections we brought with us from this world. Since
in the other world affections create ecology, it can be
seen that external evolution of the other world matches the internal growth of the people.
But it is to be remembered that no one can exist separate from some group, hence the other
world is characterized by disparate group evolution which is one of the striking
features one notes when traveling in the other world (what a marvelous anthropological
field it must be!).
Quoting from Swedenborg:
As it is desirable that the origin of perception, internal dictate, and
conscience, should be known, and as at the present day it is altogether
unknown, I may relate something on the subject. It is a great truth that man
is governed by the Lord by means of spirits and angels. When evil spirits
begin to rule, the angels labor to avert evils and falsities, and hence
arises a combat. It is this combat of which the man is rendered sensible by
perception, dictate, and conscience. By these, and also by temptations, a
man might clearly see that spirits and angels are with him, were he not so
deeply immersed in corporeal things as to believe nothing that is said about
spirits and angels. Such persons, even if they were to feel these combats
hundreds of times, would still say that they are imaginary, and the effect
of a disordered mind. I have been permitted to feel such combats, and to
have a vivid sense of them, thousands and thousands of times, and this
almost constantly for several years, as well as to know who, what, and where
they were that caused them, when they came, and when they departed; and I
have conversed with them. (AC 227)
I have discoursed with spirits concerning the common opinion that
prevails among men at the present day, that the existence of the spirit is
not to be credited because they do not see it with their eyes, nor
comprehend it by their memory- knowledges (scientias), and so they not only
deny that the spirit has extension, but also that it is a substance,
disputing as to what substance is. And as they deny that it has extension,
and also dispute about substance, they also deny that the spirit is in any
place, and consequently that it is in the human body; and yet the most
simple might know that his soul or spirit is within his body. When I said
these things, the spirits, who were some of the more simple ones, marveled
that the men of the present day are so foolish. And when they heard the
words that are disputed about, such as "parts without parts," and other such
terms, they called them absurd, ridiculous, and farcical, which should not
occupy the mind at all, because they close the way to intelligence. (AC 446)
I have conversed with many who had been known to me in this life (and
this I have done for a long time-for months and years), in as clear a voice,
although an inward one, as with friends in this world. The subject of our
conversation has sometimes been the state of man after death, and they have
wondered exceedingly that during the bodily life no one knows or believes
that he is so to live when the bodily life is over, when yet there is then a
continuation of life, and such a continuation that the man passes from an
obscure life into a clear one, and those who are in faith in the Lord into a
life that is more and more clear.
They have desired me to tell their friends that they are alive, and to
write and tell them what their condition is, even as I had related to
themselves many things about that of their friends here. But I replied that
were I to tell their friends such things, or to write to them about them,
they would not believe, but would call them delusions, would scoff at them,
and would ask for signs or miracles before they would believe; and I should
merely expose myself to their derision. And that these things are true,
perchance but few will believe. For at heart men deny the existence of
spirits, and even those who do not deny it are unwilling to hear that any
one can speak with spirits. In ancient times there was no such state of
belief in regard to spirits, but so it is now when by crazy ratiocination
men try to find out what spirits are, and by their definitions and
suppositions deprive them of all the senses, and do this the more, the more
learned they desire to be. (AC 448)
Hitherto the nature of heaven and of heavenly joy has been known to none.
Those who have thought about them have formed an idea concerning them so
general and so gross as scarcely to amount to any idea at all. What notion
they have conceived on the subject I have been able to learn most accurately
from spirits who had recently passed from the world into the other life; for
when left to themselves, as if they were in this world, they think in the
same way. I may give a few examples. (AC 449)
But in order that I might know the nature and quality of heaven and of
heavenly joy, for long and often I have been permitted by the Lord to
perceive the delights of heavenly joys, so that as I know them from actual
experience I can indeed know them, but can by no means describe them.
However, in order to give some idea of it I may say that heavenly joy is an
affection of innumerable delights and joys that form one general
simultaneous joy, in which general joy, that is, in which general affection,
there are harmonies of innumerable affections that do not come distinctly to
perception, but obscurely, because the perception is very general. Yet I was
permitted to perceive that there are things innumerable within it, in such
order as can never be described, these innumerable things being such as flow
from the order of heaven.
Such order exists in every least thing of the affection, all of which
together are presented and perceived as a very general one according to the
capacity of him who is the subject of it. In d word, in every general joy or
affection there are illimitable things ordinated in a most perfect form, and
there is nothing that is not alive or that does not affect even the inmost
things of our being, for heavenly joys proceed from inmost things. I
perceived also that the joy and deliciousness came as if from the heart, and
very softly diffused themselves through all the inmost fibers, and so into
the congregated fibers, with such an inmost sense of delight that the fiber
is as it were nothing but joy and deliciousness, and the whole derivative
perceptive and sensitive sphere the same, being alive with happiness. In
comparison with these joys the joy of bodily pleasures is like gross and
pungent dust as compared with a pure and gentle breeze.
548. I have sometimes spoken with spirits fresh from the world concerning
the state of eternal life, telling them how important it was for them to
know who is the Lord of that kingdom, and what is the nature and form of its
government, just as those in this world who go into another kingdom are
especially interested to know who and of what sort is the king, what is the
nature of the government, and many other things that belong to the kingdom;
and how much more should they be interested in this kingdom, where they are
to live forever. I told them that the Lord alone rules both heaven and the
universe, for He who rules the on must rule the other; and that the kingdom
in which they were now is the Lord's kingdom, the laws of which are eternal
truths, all of which are based on the one great law that men shall love the
Lord above all things and their neighbor as themselves, and now even more
than themselves, for if they would be as the angels this is what they must
do.
To all this they could make no reply because in their bodily life they
had heard something of the kind, but had not believed it. They marvelled
that there is such love in heaven, and that it is possible for any one to
love his neighbor more than himself, seeing that they had heard that they
were to love their neighbor as themselves. But they were instructed that in
the other life all goods are immeasurably increased, and that the life in
the body is such that men can go no further than loving the neighbor as
themselves because they are in the things of the body, but that when these
are removed, the love becomes purer, and at last angelic, which consists in
loving the neighbor more than themselves. The possibility of such love is
evident from the conjugial love that exists with some persons, who would
suffer death rather than let their married partner be injured; and also from
the love of parents for their children, in that a mother will endure
starvation rather than see her infant hunger, and this even among birds and
animals and likewise from sincere friendship, in that perils will be
undergone for our friends; and even from polite and feigned friendship, that
would emulate real friendship in offering the better things to those to whom
we wish well, making great professions even when they do not come from the
heart.
And finally its possibility is evident from the very nature of love,
which finds its joy in being of service to others, not for the sake of self
but for the love's own sake. But all this could not be comprehended by those
who loved themselves more than others, and who in the bodily life had been
greedy for gain, and least of all by the avaricious. (AC 545)
1.6.7.1
The Anatomical Layers of the Mind
Quoting from the Writings Sacred
Scripture:
DLW 40. Divine love and wisdom are both substance
and form. People commonly have an idea of love and wisdom as abstract entities
flying about or floating in the subtler air or ether, or as exhalations
emanating from something of that nature. Scarcely anyone thinks that they are
really and actually substance and form.
People who do see that they are substance and form
still perceive love and wisdom round about the subject of which they are
predicated as properties emanating from it; and what they perceive round about
a subject as emanating from it-even if perceived as something flying about or
floating-they also call substance and form, not knowing that love and wisdom
constitute the subject itself, and that whatever is perceived as flying or
floating round about it is simply the appearance of the subject's underlying
state.
[2] This has not been seen before for a number of
reasons. One of these reasons is that the first perceptions out of which the
human mind forms its understanding are appearances, appearances which it
cannot dispel without investigating their cause; and if the cause lies deeply
hidden, the mind cannot investigate it without keeping its intellect for a
long time in spiritual light, which it cannot do because of the natural light
that constantly draws it back down.
Yet the truth is that love and wisdom are real and actual substance and form,
which constitute the very subject of which they are predicated. (DLW 40)
AC 5008. It is impossible from natural light to
see the things which are of spiritual light. This is contrary to order; but it
is according to order that the things which are in natural light should be
seen from spiritual light. (AC 5008)
AC 3498. When man is in the world, or lives in the
body, his rational is distinct from his natural, insomuch that he can be
withdrawn from the external sensuous things of the body, and also in some
degree from the interior sensuous things of his natural man, and can be in his
rational, thus in spiritual thought. (AC 3498)
AC 3827. By the affection of genuine love man is withdrawn
from bodily and worldly things, for his mind is elevated toward heaven, and
thus is withdrawn from the things of time. (AC 3827)
AC 2479. The case is that insofar as the mind can be
withdrawn from sensuous or corporeal things, so far is it elevated to
spiritual and heavenly things. (AC 2479)
AC 10229. In order that a man may think what is good, he
must think from heaven, consequently his mind must be raised there. This is
effected solely by means of truths such as are in the church from the Word;
for these truths teach what God is, and what the neighbor, that there is a
heaven, that there is eternal life, and in particular what evil is, and what
good is. When these truths enter, then the interiors are raised above self,
and are thus withdrawn from those things which are beneath self, thus from
evils. (AC 10229)
AC 4096. They who have worldly and earthly things
as their end, cannot withdraw their senses from them; and even if they did so,
they would perceive what is undelightful; in which case they would be
departing and withdrawing from the things they have as their end, that is,
which they love. (AC 4096)
AC 9730. y the external sensuous is not meant the sense of
the body itself, as its sight, hearing, taste, smell, and touch, but that
which is most nearly from these; for he is called a sensuous man who thinks
and desires according to these senses of the body and their appetites, and
considers no further. He who considers further, and examines what the sensuous
desires, and what he himself thinks from the sensuous, is said to be raised
above the sensuous, or to be withdrawn from it, and to think interiorly. This
is the case with those at the present day who are in the good of charity and
of faith. When this is done, the sensuous is quiescent, and is deprived of its
active life which it has from the world and its objects. AC 9730
AC 10362. Be it known further that to be led by
self, and to be led by the Lord, are two opposites; for he who is led by
himself is led by his own loves, thus by hell, because man's own loves are
from hell; and he who is led by the Lord is led by the loves of heaven, which
are love to the Lord and love toward the neighbor. He who is led by these
loves is withdrawn from his own loves; and he who is led by his own loves is
withdrawn from the loves of heaven, because they by no means agree together;
for the life of man is either in heaven or in hell. (AC 10362)
AC 10330. Man is of such a nature that in respect to his
interiors, which are of thought and will, he can look downward, and he can
look upward. To look downward is to look outward into the world and to self,
and to look upward is to look inward to heaven and to God. Man looks outward
from self, and this is called looking downward, because when he does so from
himself he looks to hell. But man looks inward not from self, but from the
Lord; and this is called looking upward, because in respect to his interiors
which are of the will and understanding he is then raised by the Lord to
heaven, and thus to the Lord.
Moreover, the interiors are actually raised, and
are then actually withdrawn from the body and from the world. When this is
done, the interiors of the man come actually into heaven, and into its light
and heat. From this he has influx and enlightenment, for the light of heaven
illumines his understanding, because this light is the Divine truth which
proceeds from the Lord as a Sun; and the heat of heaven enkindles the will,
because this heat is the good of love which at the same time proceeds from the
Lord as a Sun. As the man is then among the angels, there is communicated to
him from them, that is, through them from the Lord, the understanding of truth
and the affection of good. This communication is what is called influx and
enlightenment. (AC 10330)
AC 6613. When a man is being elevated toward interior
things, he comes out of the gross sensuous light into a milder light, and at
the same time is withdrawn from the influx of scandalous and filthy things,
and is brought nearer to the things that belong to what is just and fair,
because nearer to the angels who are with him, thus nearer to the light of
heaven. This elevation from sensuous things was known to the ancients, even to
the Gentiles, and therefore when the lower mind is withdrawn from sensuous
things, their wise men said that it comes into interior light, and at the same
time into a tranquil state, and into a kind of heavenly bliss; and from this
they also concluded that the mind is immortal.
Man is capable of being
elevated still more interiorly, and the more interiorly he is elevated, the
clearer is the light into which he comes; and at last he comes into the light
of heaven, which light is nothing else than wisdom and intelligence from the
Lord. The three heavens are distinguished in no other way than according to
elevations toward interior things, thus also according to degrees of light;
the third heaven, being in inmost things, is in the greatest light, thus in a
wisdom which far surpasses the wisdom of the lower heavens. (AC 6313)
AC 5301. Man has two minds, a rational mind and a natural
mind; the rational mind is of the internal man, and the natural mind is of the
external man. (AC 5301)
There are two minds in man; one is the natural,
and the other the rational mind; the natural mind is the mind of the external
man, but the rational mind is the mind of the internal man. The things of the
natural mind are called memory-knowledges, but those of the rational mind are
called intellectual reasons; they are also distinguished from each other by
the fact that the things of the natural mind are for the most part in the
light of the world, which is called the light of nature; whereas the things of
the rational mind are in the light of heaven, which light is spiritual light.
(AC 7130)
AC 2851. There are two ways which lead into man's
rational mind--a higher or internal one, through which good and truth from the
Lord enter, and a lower or external one, through which evil and falsity come
up from hell. The rational mind itself is in the middle, and to it these ways
tend. (AC 2851)
AC 3509. The rational mind is distinguished into
two faculties, one faculty being called the will, and the other the
understanding. During man's regeneration, that which proceeds from the will is
called good, and that which proceeds from the understanding is called truth.
Before man has been regenerated the will does not act as one with the
understanding; but the former wills good, while the latter wills truth;
insomuch that an effort of the will is perceived as being quite distinct from
one of the understanding. This however is perceived only by those who reflect,
and who know what the will is and the things that belong thereto, and what the
understanding is and the things that belong thereto; but it is not perceived
by those who do not know these things and therefore who do not reflect, for
the reason that the natural mind is regenerated through the rational mind (see
n. 3493), and this according to an order such that the good of the rational
does not flow immediately into the good of the natural and regenerate it, but
through the truth which is of the understanding, thus in appearance from the
truth of the rational. (AC 3509)
AC 3020. As the natural mind is distinct from the
rational mind and is in a degree below it, and as it also acts as if from what
is its own, it is called relatively a "servant the elder of the house," and it
is said to administer all the things in itself that belong to it. That the
natural mind is distinct from the rational, and is in a lower degree, and is
as if in what is its own, may be seen from the things within it, and from its
offices. The things which are therein are all memory-knowledges, thus also all
knowledges of every kind whatever; in a word, they are all things in both
general and particular that belong to the outer or corporeal memory
(concerning which see n. 2471, 2480). To this mind also belongs all the
imaginative faculty, which is the interior sensuous with man, and which is in
the greatest vigor with children; and in the first age of adolescence; to the
same mind belong also all natural affections that man has in common with brute
animals; all of which shows what its offices are.
[3] But the rational mind is more internal. The
knowledges in it are not open before man, but while he lives in the body are
imperceptible; for they are all things in both general and particular that
belong to the interior memory (concerning which see n. 2470-2474, 2489, 2490).
To this mind also belongs all the thinking faculty that is perceptive of what
is equitable and just, and of what is true and good; also all spiritual
affections, which are properly human, and by which man is distinguished from
the brute animals. From these things this mind flows into the natural mind,
and excites the things that are therein, and views them with a kind of sight,
and in this manner judges and forms conclusions. That these two minds are
distinct is clearly evident from the fact that with many persons the natural
mind bears rule over the rational mind; or what is the same, the external man
over the internal man; and that it does not bear rule but serves with those
only who are in the good of charity, that is, who suffer themselves to be led
by the Lord. (AC 3020)
AC 4009. Man's natural communicates on the one
side with the sensuous things of the body, and on the other side with the
rational things of the rational mind. By these intermediates there is effected
as it were an ascent from the sensuous things that are of the body and that
have been opened toward the world, to the rational things that are of the
rational mind and that have been opened toward heaven; and also a descent from
these, that is, from heaven to the world. (AC 4009)
AC 4345. The body itself, and the things of the
body, such as those called the external senses and the actions, are relatively
the most general. The natural mind and the things of this mind are less
general, because more interior, and relatively are called particulars. But the
rational mind and the things of this mind are still more interior, and
relatively are singulars. (AC 4345)
AC 3849. The most external affections are those of
the body, and are called appetites and pleasures; the next interior affections
are those of the natural mind, and are called natural affections; but the
internal affections are those of the rational mind, and are called spiritual
affections. (AC 3849)
AC 8209. There is a sphere exhaling from the hells which
may be called a sphere of endeavors, and which is a sphere of doing evil. I
have several times been allowed to perceive this sphere. The endeavor in it is
constant, and as soon as any opportunity offers, the effect breaks forth from
it. But this sphere is restrained by the sphere of the endeavors of heaven
which is from the Lord, and is a sphere of imparting benefits, in which is all
power, because it is from the Divine.
Nevertheless equilibrium is maintained
between these diametrically opposite endeavors, to the intent that man may be
in freedom, and thus in choice, and that he can be reformed; for all
reformation is in freedom, and without freedom there is no reformation.
Spiritual endeavor is the same as will. During man's reformation he is kept in
equilibrium (that is, in freedom) between willing good and willing evil; and
insofar as he then accedes to willing what is good, so far he accedes to
heaven and recedes from hell; and so far the new will which he then receives
from the Lord prevails against his own will which he received by inheritance
from his parents and afterward by actual life. When therefore a man has been
so far reformed that he wills good and is affected with it, then good removes
evil, because the Lord is present in good; for good is from the Lord, thus it
is His, nay, it is Himself. From all this it can be seen how the case is with
the endeavor of the influxes with man. (AC 8209)
1.6.8
Sacred
Scripture As the Source of Scientific Revelations
With the positive bias in
science in view we can examine the content of Divine
Speech that is contained in Sacred Scripture. It makes sense from the
perspective of the positive bias in science to ask this question: What mechanisms or
methods does God use to communicate with the human mind or the human race?
From a religious or non-scientific view one merely feels it to be obvious
that God can talk to individuals through an outer or inner voice. In modern
times God does not talk with an outer voice as in the days of the Old and
New Testaments where thousands of people standing before Mount Sinai could
all hear God's thunderous voice speaking the Commandments, or in some other
miraculous event. But the modern mind, raised and educated in a culture of
the negative bias in science,
does not allow for God's outer voice. Today God speaks to every individual's
rational mind through Sacred Scripture and conscience.
Sacred Scripture is an
external source of access to communication with God, like a printed book,
computer screen, sermon, lecture, or conversation. Conscience is an
interior source of access to communication with God (See
Section 7.0.4.1). Both external and
interior sources provide the individual with a higher or purer rational thinking
and reasoning about self, society, and eternity. Both sources of communication
with God give us rational methods to develop morality and the legal system. For
instance, the Ten Commandments that God speaks in the Old Testament Sacred
Scripture inform us that fairness, honesty, conjugal loyalty, and respect for
the rights of others are character traits that we must learn to acquire and
love, and if we don't, then our personality will be evil, that is, connected to
the hells in the mind. Upon resuscitation into eternity, our character
determines whether we live a joyful and rational heavenly existence, or one that
is filled with dissatisfaction and desperation.
If we make ourselves think and
act in accordance with God's commandments in Sacred Scripture, then our
character will be able to exist in the heavens of the mental world, but if we
arrive with a character that enjoys unfair advantage, hates the good fortune of
others, covets what is theirs, and plots to cheat and rob them whenever
possible.
You can see that this knowledge
is so crucial to us and that God communicates it to us in Sacred Scripture,
which is God's Speech with mankind, translated into a natural language
(see Section xx).
It is similar with the interior
communication with God through our conscience. People talk about "the voice of
conscience" because it feels like an internal voice talking, judging, analyzing,
warning, confirming or disconfirming. God speaks to us through conscience
when we sense that interior voice of rationality and good sense, fairness,
respect (See Section 7.0.4.1).
God teaches us directly
through the voice of conscience (interior access), and indirectly through
our reflection and understanding of Sacred Scripture (external access). Both are
necessary to achieve our full human potential in eternity. After resuscitation
we undergo a psycho-biological change or evolution during which we shed off the
superficial aspects of our personality.
For example a person on earth who
was outwardly friendly and peaceful in his daily interactions, may have done
this for selfish or hypocritical reasons or motivations. When he was showing an
outward appearance of being a nice person, he actually in his own private mind
was constantly ridiculing the people, denigrating them to himself, fantasizing
all sorts of violence against them, and wishing their demise or injury. Now this
is his actual character, the way he thins and what motivates him. But he has
surrounded this character with a socially convenient role or enactment. This is
his social personality. Outwardly a lamb, inwardly a wolf.
After resuscitation, this
individual will rapidly shed the outward personality traits, and more and more
become outwardly this person he had always been inwardly. When this process is
complete, the person has gotten rid of anything that is not consistent with his
ruling love.
The chief ruling loves of our
hellish character are the love of self for the sake of self and the love
of the world for the sake of world.
The chief ruling loves of our
heavenly character are the love of self for the sake of others and the
love of the world for the sake of others.
Memorize the above definition.
Then you will be able to notice it in yourself when you observe yourself in your
daily activities. It is clearly of the utmost importance for you and me to know
where we are headed in eternity. It's like committing to a one way ticket to
some address in the U.S. where you'll be stuck for a decade. Wouldn't you read
the information on various addresses available before you use the ticket? You
don't want to select a ticket to some prison, or meat factory, or cemetery, or
hospital. See what's involved?
In this case the choice you make
is not for a decade for an eternity, and not a mere hospital or prison, but a
place of horror and extreme hardship. The instant you enter the positive bias in
science in
a real way, you will be enlightened and begin to see your way to the places of
eternity in your mind. You are headed there regardless of what you think or
want. Hence controlling the situation is the rational and safe thing to do. God
gives us the information with which to control the situation, as discussed
above.
For thousands of years, many generations including today, have read and
worshipped the Old and New Testaments. Scholars have studied its every word
and expression. Scientists have looked for hidden codes, messages,
prophecies. Archeological effort was spent in finding old records and
artifacts where the historical events are known to have taken place. The
Bible is the most printed title in all publishing history, year after year,
and continues so this year. But not a single person has ever discovered that
the Old and New Testaments are written in a Divine Style that is layered in
meaning, as the reader goes from surface meaning to deeper meaning.
No one. Until this giant scientific fact was revealed in the third
portion of Sacred Scripture known as the Writings of Swedenborg (published
between 1743 and 1771).
(See Section xx).
For the first time in human history God makes new scientific revelations
for the modern mind.
Now we know that all Sacred Scripture is Divine Speech incorporating a
scientific message from God to human beings. This is completely different
from the other idea which is that God speaks to each individual through an
inner voice. This is also true. However, when we look at it
closer we can see that God's inner voice is more like being inspired when
we are reflecting on some topic, and begin to see insights we haven't before.
There is no actual voice from God that we hear when God is inspiring us or
giving us answers to questions. The answers are in our own language of ideas
or words, not in God's language or Divine Speech. This is why we call it
"inspired" thinking, but not Sacred Scripture.
Sacred Scripture is actually Divine Speech, but not in the sense that God
pronounced those words, except when God is quoted. I would guess that less
than 10 percent of the Old and New Testaments, are direct quotes from God,
and in the Writings, there are no quotes from God, except those from the Old
and New Testaments. In other words, almost all of Sacred Scripture consists
of sentences not directly spoken by God. And yet, the entire text of
Sacred Scripture is a direct quote from God and is Divine Speech.
What kind of mystery is this? It is not. There is a perfectly rational
and scientific explanation given in the Writings Sacred Scripture. And this explanation
is the heart and soul of theistic psychology.
The text of Sacred Scripture actually starts out as Divine Speech
spoken by the Divine Human who can be visually seen amidst the Spiritual Sun
surrounded by it like a bright flaming aura. The Divine Human creates every
human being with an organic mind containing built in levels of capability.
The "celestial" level of the mind is the highest rational level, and below
that is the spiritual level of the mind, below that is the rational
level, then the natural mind, and finally at the bottom of the mind is the corporeal
level (see Section xx). All these levels exist by birth in every human
being. When God communicates an idea or truth to humanity,
the Divine Speech descends from God and enters the mind of human beings at
its highest level called celestial.
Swedenborg confirms that those who
dwell in their highest heavens in their mind, receive the Divine Speech
directly into their perception and understanding. The people who operate at the
celestial level are the first echelon
of humanity receiving the Divine meaning, truth, principle, or message. Any
person can function at any level of the human mind, but only some people,
according to Swedenborg's observations, are willing to function at the celestial
level. They prefer to function at the spiritual or natural level. The level at
which people are willing to function in their eternity depends on the
personality and life style they acquired in this life (see Section xx).
If you understand that spiritual development is gradual from birth to
eternity, you can see that God's Rational Truth is infinite in depth and
cannot be fully comprehended by finite human minds even though they will
live endlessly in the eternity of the mental world. Every human mind or
spirit, is born with
a celestial-rational organ at the top of the mind. This spiritual organ is created to
be able to receive Divine Speech in a form accommodated to finite minds.
This form is called celestial-rational
correspondences to the Divine Truth contained in the Divine Speech. When
our thinking and willing operates at the celestial level, which is the
highest human potential, we are closest to God and are then called angels.
Swedenborg talked to angels when God elevated Swedenborg's consciousness to
the celestial level of operation. While in that state of mind, he was able
to see the angels and talked to them.
This was a unique ability Swedenborg was given so that he
could write the Writings Sacred Scripture based on the experiences and
perceptions he was allowed to have. We likewise will see what he could see, but
only after our resuscitation (see section xx). While our mind is still connected
to a physical body on earth, the celestial level of the mind, and the spiritual mind,
remain unconscious. Hence we have no idea as to what operations go on there. Nor
can we talk to those who are in the afterlife, like Swedenborg did. Only
when we resuscitate following the death of the physical body, and begin our life of
immortality in the spiritual world, only then do we become conscious of our
spiritual mind. The spiritual mind is an organ below the celestial mind and
it is capable of operations of consciousness or meaning at the level of
spiritual-rational correspondences to Divine Speech (see Section xx).
While we are in the physical body we are only conscious of our natural
mind. This has several sub-levels. The highest level can think with
natural-rational correspondences. The intermediate level can think with
natural-sensuous correspondences. The lowest level can think with
natural-corporeal correspondences (see Section xx). These three levels of human thinking are
evolutionary for the historical race and ontological for each individual
development. The individual development recapitulates the racial evolution
(see Section xx). The Old Testament is written in natural-corporeal correspondences. The New Testament, written hundreds of years
later, is written in natural-sensuous correspondences. Hence the two
views of God are contrastive in terms of their mentality or rationality. Every individual
starts with a natural-corporeal mentality of God which we maintain throughout
childhood. Then we acquire a natural-sensuous mentality of God, and at last, a
mentality based on natural-rational correspondences.
Our own level of understanding tends to reflect the mentality level of
our culture. Those who function intellectually with natural-corporeal
correspondences of divine Speech, have an Old Testament mentality of
society, marriage, family, and human interactions. At this level of
mentality we are impressed only by what is corporeal, even when we think
about God and heaven. At this lowest level of materialistic thinking about
God, we believe
our sense impressions as the ultimate reality, even when sense
impressions are appearances and illusions. We trust things we can see
and touch and we consider the tangible like the brain, more real than the
intangible, like the mind, soul, or spirit. We feel satisfied only if we
obtain tangible goods, like money, fame, and possessions. We operate by the
principle that blood is thicker than water, and we favor our biological
children over step children or adopted children.
Common consequences
of this mentality include racism, blood loyalty, animal sacrifices,
superstition, genocide, cruelty and discrimination against women, harsh physical
punishments for transgressions, authoritarian and autocratic systems of power,
religious intolerance, sectarianism, social and political thought-control, caste
system, unequal justice. These anti-democratic values of
domination and racism are created by the low level of rationality contained in
corporeal-rational correspondences of Divine speech.
At this level of mentality, God is portrayed as a harsh
potentate or king who sometimes falls into rages against people, destroys them
and the land they live on. Such a God exercises favoritism to one particular
people just because they have the same bloodline to a patriarch. In this Old
Testament mentality expressed in natural-corporeal correspondences, there
is no consciousness or knowledge of the afterlife. It is mentioned once or
twice, here and there, but nothing specific is given.
As a result, the religions based on the Old Testament
Sacred Scripture teach religious materialism, which is the belief
that the afterlife is going to be lived in the natural world, not the spiritual
world of eternity. This belief puts the afterlife into the future, and those who
die in the meantime, are kept by God somewhere as immaterial souls, which will
then descend back to earth when physical bodies will be given them once more.
These corporeal-spiritual ideas emerge from the literal sense of the Old
Testament Sacred Scripture. This corporeal spirituality is the lowest form of
Divine Speech, which started out at the top of the mind with celestial-rational
correspondences, then as it descended through the other layers of the mind, was
transformed in content and meaning, until it reached the lowest rational level
of civilized human mentality, reasoning, and meaning.
We operate at the next level of rationality when our
mentality is shaped by natural-sensuous
correspondences of Divine Speech. This level of thinking and willing is
described in the literal sense of the New Testament Sacred Scripture
regarding God, society,
marriage, family, and heaven and hell. At this level of mentality
we are impressed by what is symbolic and mental, when it comes to God and
heaven. We think of heaven and hell as not in this world but in the
spiritual world. We think of ourselves not as material bodies but as spirits
within the body. Our reward system is not based in worldly success and
possessions, as in the earlier mentality described above. Instead, we now
think that our reward for doing the right things is in eternity, not in this
material and temporary world. The literal sense of the New Testament Sacred
Scripture discusses the resuscitation of the spirits in the world of
eternity immediately after the death of the physical body.
Divine Speech is perfectly rational but its rationality
diminishes from perfection as it descends through the layers of every human
mind. The topics and meanings of Divine Speech are closer to perfection in the
upper levels of the mind, and diminish in perfection as Divine speech is
translated into lower forms of correspondences, the lowest being the
natural-corporeal correspondences of the Old Testament Sacred Scripture, as
discussed above. The level just above this is the level of natural-sensuous
correspondences in which the New Testament Sacred Scripture is written.
At this intermediate level of rational thinking we believe our
sense abstractions as the ultimate reality, even when sense
abstractions are only appearances of a higher reality. This is a higher
level, rationally, than the corporeal spirituality where the thinking is based
on the senses, not on abstractions from the senses. For example, consider the
idea presented in the Sacred Scripture that God is a Spirit and that we are also
spirits in a material body. This level of thinking uses the rationality of
natural-sensuous correspondences. At this level we are able to comprehend the
idea in the New Testament Sacred Scripture that "heaven is within you," which
requires the idea that the spiritual world of eternity is the same as the mental
world of the present. These ideas are sense abstractions, while the idea that
the afterlife is here on earth, is merely based on the senses, without
abstractions, and that level of mentality and thinking is called
natural-corporeal correspondences of Divine Speech.
Common consequences
of the higher rational mentality of natural-sensuous correspondences, include
religion as universal rather than sectarian, which is an attitude of inclusion of the entire human race,
an attitude of loyalty towards others based on similarity of faith rather than
on blood, an attitude of mental or psychological sacrifices
for the sake of God rather than physical or animal sacrifices for worship,
an attitude of prohibition against discrimination or cruelty, and
an attitude supportive of democratic systems of power sharing and individual
freedom. These values of equity and justice are
created by the level of rationality contained in natural-sensuous
correspondences. These are the cultural values promoted by the Divine Speech
in the form of the natural-sensuous correspondences of the new Testament Sacred
Scripture.
When we enter the next higher rational level of
mentality and thinking, we are able to comprehend Divine Speech in terms of
natural-rational
correspondences about God, society, marriage, family, and the afterlife. This is the level of
mentality in the Writings Sacred Scripture. This level is the basis for theistic psychology. At this level of mentality we
are impressed by what is rational and scientific, when it comes to God and
heaven. At this highest level of rational thinking we believe rational
scientific revelations of Divine Speech as the ultimate reality and truth, and we
recognize that spiritual rationality cannot be discovered by observation or
deduction, but only by revelation from God to the human mind.
Common consequences of this mentality of rational spirituality include
intellectual enlightenment, feeling
networked to the entire human race, loyalty based on usefulness, cooperation
with God in character reformation, constant self-improvement, and
participation in democratic systems that promote individual freedom and the
common good. These values of
justice, goodness, and rationality are created by the level of mentality
contained in natural-rational correspondences of Divine Speech, as we find
them in the Writings Sacred Scripture.
The vast superiority of the natural-rational correspondences over the
previous human mentality (natural-sensuous), lies in this, that the natural-rational
correspondences contain spiritual-natural and spiritual-rational
correspondences hidden within them. This means that it is possible to
extract the hidden higher meanings by applying the special extraction
techniques of theistic psychology (see Section xx). Another way of saying this is that the natural-rational
correspondences have the symbolic capacity of representing higher-order
ideas and principles. These higher order ideas are called spiritual-rational
correspondences. Once we have acquired natural-rational correspondences in
our mind from theistic psychology, our cognitive organ is prepared to
operate from inner influx. this is called illumination or enlightenment (see
Section xx).
In other words, instead of merely natural thinking
that we can perform with
natural language expressions of God and the afterlife, we can also think with a superior, more rational type of
language called spiritual thinking. Swedenborg was able to think spiritually
in the universal spiritual language in which we all think and speak after
resuscitation, when we awaken in our spiritual body a few hours after the
death of the physical body. At that point we think only spiritually and talk only in a universal
spiritual language that is spontaneously used by everyone in eternity. To think
spiritually means to think with higher rational correspondences of Divine
Speech, namely with spiritual-natural correspondences, then with spiritual-rational correspondences, and
finally with celestial-rational correspondences.
Meanwhile on earth, before we are resuscitated, our spiritual mind is not consciously
available to our awareness. We
operate consciously only in our natural mind at the three levels, as
explained above. At the highest level of the natural mind we think with
natural-rational correspondences. But we are capable of becoming conscious
of higher order meanings. When we acquire this capacity we are called
enlightened. This simply means that when we are reading a sentence
of the Writings Sacred Scripture, which is written at the level of natural-rational correspondences
of Divine Speech, we are capable of understanding the sentence and its ideas
at a deeper level of rational spirituality. This higher rational level of
reasoning and understanding
consists of thinking with higher order correspondences, namely, spiritual-natural correspondences, spiritual-rational
correspondences, and celestial-rational correspondences.
The ideas we have through thinking with these higher
rational correspondences of Divine Speech, are virtual
representations of the actual spiritual thinking we do in our spiritual mind
after resuscitation, when we arrive into our First
Heaven (spiritual-natural correspondences), then in our Second Heaven
(spiritual-rational correspondences), and finally in our Third Heaven (celestial-rational
correspondences). Though we are still on earth, we are capable of thinking
with spiritual and celestial ideas that are in themselves not spiritual and
celestial, but are functionally equivalent. We therefore derive the benefits
of a superior rational mentality in both thoughts and feelings.
Where do these spiritual-natural, spiritual-rational, and
celestial-rational correspondences come from?
They cannot be discovered nor invented by the natural mind. Proof of this
is found in history. With the rise of modern science, it became more and
more materialistic science. Scientists started to live a schizophrenic
intellectual life. They are materialists in their explanations during the
week and on the job, but dualist in explanation at home and on Church or
temple worship days. As a result, the two
conceptions of the universe (materialist and dualist), and the religious
notion of everyone's immortality after death, were so
contrastive and contradictory that they could not be held consistently in
the minds of scientists. They had to be segregated in the mind of
scientists. They were a divided mind -- materialistic at work, dualist at
home. As a
result they kept themselves unable to develop their higher rational
mentality in science.
But theistic psychology introduces the human mind to dualism in the
positive bias in science. Here for the first time in science we have access to the
higher universal scientific content of Divine Speech. Until then we only had
access to the natural correspondences of Sacred Scripture written in a
historical or prophetic style. But ever since the third component of Sacred
Scripture was revealed in the Writings of Swedenborg (1743-1771), humanity
knows that Divine Speech descends to our mind by progressive correspondences
downward in rationality. First Divine Speech is received in the Third Heaven
(celestial mind) by means of celestial-rational correspondences. Then,
Divine Speech is received in the Second Heaven (spiritual mind) by means of
spiritual-rational correspondences. Then Divine Speech is received in the
First Heaven (spiritual-natural mind) by means of spiritual-natural
correspondences. Then Divine Speech is received in the natural mind at three
sub-levels in descending rationality -- natural-rational correspondences
(the ideas of God in the Writings of Swedenborg), natural-sensuous
correspondences (the New Testament ideas of God), and finally
natural-corporeal correspondences (Old Testament ideas of God).
It is the level of correspondences we understand that determines the
level of our mentality, consciousness, rationality, and civilization.
The Old Testament text was Divine Speech received into the mind of
prophets whose mentality functioned at the lowest level of relating to
historical and natural events (natural-corporeal correspondences about
God). God's Divine Speech came to them from God, but down the line from
God's downward exteriorization in human consciousness. This is why the Old
Testament text appears on the surface to be written about the history of a
racial group in ancient Palestine. Compared to our modern democracy, they
were of a barbaric mentality, racist, and selfish, hardly caring about
anyone except their own tribe. This was the world mentality of all humanity
at that time. People as adults or strangers who read the Old Testament for
the first time are appalled that this should be considered Holy Writ. It is
full of factual contradictions and confusing poetic talk about visions. The
people do not even know that they are immortal and that there is an
afterlife that starts immediately upon the death of the physical body (see
Section 1.7). This abstract and rational level of thinking they could
not comprehend because they were bound to materialistic ideas of physical
life.
At this level of thinking God comes across as complaining, vengeful,
petty, self-involved, unsure of his works, and favoring this individual over
that solely on the basis of race and blood line. This is the level of
thinking about God when it is done with natural-corporeal correspondences.
The New Testament is written in natural-sensuous correspondences, which are
at a higher level of abstraction. For instance, one idea presented in the
New Testament is that "heaven is within you." This is much more abstract in
rational content than the view that heaven is on this earth once the old
earth is recreated and made new (Old Testament mentality). A mental
(spiritual) heaven is at a higher rational level of comprehension of God
than a physical, earthly heaven.
Seventeen centuries had to go by after the New Testament was written
before Divine Speech could be written down in higher order correspondences
called natural-rational correspondences (the Writings of Swedenborg). This
higher level of reasoning is the basis of theistic psychology. With this
level of rationality the human race has reached a new plateau of evolution.
It is a kind of completion of creation in the sense that human beings are
now routinely capable of thinking about God and the universe in terms of
scientific revelations through reconstructing Divine Speech. This leaves
religion completely alone and speaks only from the perspective of scientific
correspondences hidden within the literal sentences of Sacred Scripture.
Religion is tied to the literal meaning of sentences in Sacred Scripture.
Theistic psychology starts where religion leaves off, namely in the hidden
correspondences not visible to the normal reader reading their religious
text. In fact, most religious organizations and representatives in the
Christian world have ignored the Writings of Swedenborg.
Similarly, the New Church religion based on the Writings of Swedenborg,
which considers the Writings as the "Word of God" along with the Old and New
Testaments, are not inclined to probe the Writings for the higher scientific
correspondences that are hidden in it. This is because the purpose of
religion and that of theistic psychology are different. I think it is
possible for people from any religion, Christian or non-Christian, to study
theistic psychology as a science. This is because they are not put off by
the literal meaning any more, when they penetrate to the interior scientific
meaning so that the literal, historical, cultural, and religious meanings
disappear from view or content. The copies Swedenborg saw in the spiritual
world of the Old and New Testaments, and of his own Writings, were all
written in the universal spiritual language, which is a language of grouped
integrated thoughts more than individual words. When the people in the
spiritual world read these books of Sacred Scripture they have absolutely no
idea of the literal meaning that contains historical--cultural references
such as the Jews, Jerusalem, Jesus Christ, Moses, Abraham, Gethsemane, or
any of the numbers like 40 days or thousands of people.
Nothing historical, religious, cultural, or natural appears in the
spiritual meaning of Sacred Scripture.
This is because the actual content of Divine Speech is about how the
human mind works, how it is to be regenerated and prepared for heavenly life
in immortality. There is no other subject mentioned by God in His Divine
Speech to the human race. Look at the
Overall Table of Contents
of Theistic Psychology. You can see pages and pages of topics listed. They
are all about the human mind. This is what God is talking about to the human
race. Our modern educated rational mind can now comprehend the content of
scientific revelations contained in the language of natural-rational
correspondences (theistic psychology and the Writings of Swedenborg).
At this level of scientific and universal rationality we can acquire
enlightenment so that we might start thinking in terms of representatives of
spiritual thinking.
From all this you can see what is the role of Divine Speech in human life. It is
what lines up and arranges the human mind in its created order of
rationality. It accomplishes this through levels of human understanding that
correspond to higher and higher rationality, which is the vehicle for
evolution of human potential and eternal happiness. Divine Speech is the
source of human rationality. The following table shows the level of
consciousness attained through the different layers of correspondences laid
down in Sacred Scripture.
↑ Read
Chart From Bottom Up
↑
|
|
Levels of Development of Rational Consciousness |
Sacred Scripture Correspondences of Divine Speech |
Anatomical Area of Operation in the Human Mind
|
|
Level
6
phase three
theistic psychology |
celestial-rational
(or interior rational)
correspondences
|
unconscious
celestial mind
(third heaven) |
|
Level
5
phase two
theistic psychology |
spiritual-rational
correspondences
|
unconscious
spiritual mind
(second heaven) |
|
Level
4
phase one
theistic psychology |
spiritual-natural
(or interior natural)
correspondences
|
enlightened conscious
spiritual-natural mind
(first heaven) |
|
Level
3
the Writings of
Swedenborg
|
natural-rational
correspondences
|
conscious
natural-rational mind |
|
Level
2
New Testament
|
natural-sensuous
correspondences
|
conscious
natural-sensuous mind |
|
Level 1
Old Testament
|
natural-corporeal
correspondences
|
conscious
natural-corporeal
mind |
The chart above maps out six levels of rational consciousness of God and
ties them to the correspondences we extract from Sacred Scripture as Divine
Speech. Recall that individual mental development recapitulates or emulates
the evolutionary steps of the historical human race. The six steps shown
here are mental steps every individual goes through in the course of life on
earth, and the level of development we attain in this brief life will determine the quality of
our life in immortality. The chart also shows how human development and
evolution is dependent on rational meaning supplied by God in Divine Speech.
The Old Testament mentality about God (level 1) is regulated by the
"natural-corporeal " correspondences in which that ancient text is written.
I call this the natural-corporeal mind because when we are still in this
phase we hang on to the literal meaning of the Old Testament, so that our
mentality is formed by the apparent harshness and sectarian content of this
literal meaning. It is called corporeal because the correspondences are
written at an external level of relationship with God, limited mostly to
life in the natural world. At this level of mentality God operates in the
physical world, and wants us to participate in community rituals of worship
and self-purification. The afterlife is also on this physical earth, once it
is recreated and the dead are raised from their grave. There is also an
emphasis of blood line and race, and on vengeance and massacres. Hence it is
a corporeal; focus of God and religion. It raises human rationality to the
first level above animals. God is acknowledged as universal and infinite,
creating and managing a universe by means of laws and rules. This makes the
mentality rational. In other words, it is Divine Speech in the form of
natural-corporeal correspondences (level 1) that creates the first human
consciousness of rationality. Without this, we are not yet human in our
evolution.
The New Testament phase of mentality (level 2) is a
"sensuous" natural mind that is formed by the natural-sensuous
correspondences in which this text is written. The literal meaning of New
Testament sentences refer to various concepts or ideas that are completely
absent from the Old Testament text. The people who wrote the New Testament
had a more advanced rational idea of God because they were part of the
generation during which the Incarnation Event or embodiment of God took place. God came to them
in a physical mode so that they had a direct conscious sensuous knowledge of
God as a Divine Man. The faith of subsequent generations, including today,
is based entirely on the historical event they witnessed. Hence the
Christian religion, which is based on the literal meaning of the New
Testament, is founded on the sensuous identity of the Son of God. People
know Him sensuously -- when He was born, what He went through in life on
earth, how He was killed as a mere human, and then how He resurrected from
the grave as a Divine Human and ascended to the heavens of the spiritual
world where He can be seen in His Natural Body.
This sensuous consciousness of God as the resurrected historical Divine
Human is at a higher level of rationality than level 1 because it recognizes
that God is not only infinite and omnipotent, but Human as well. A sensuous
consciousness of God allows the rational idea of the Holy Spirit, which is
the presence of the Divine Human in the conscious mind of every individual.
Thinking of God as present in the mind is a level 2 rationality that does
not make sense at level 1 rationality. At level 1, God is seen as external
to self. This is because God is seen only in terms of physical expression,
and what is physical is external to the mental. But at level 2 it is taught
and understood God is inside the mind because "God is spirit." Spirit is
inside. It is mental. An example of the difference is the conception of
heaven. At level 1 rationality, heaven is on this earth or some recreated
earth. At level 2 raitonali8ty, heaven is in the mind, as stated in the New
Testament text. And there many other differences, as will be discussed.
The Writings of Swedenborg phase of mentality (level 3) is a
"rational" mind that is formed by the natural-rational correspondences in
which the text of the Writings is written. God is now the Divine Human who
not only is inside the mind, but forms it and participates in its formation
moment by moment, from birth to eternity. This level of rationality is
higher than the sensuous knowledge of God because it relies on the rational
understanding of the Divine Human. The core quality of the Divine Human is
the Divine Rational, also called the Divine Truth. This is a spiritual
building substance for created things. The literal meaning of the sentences
in the Writings are called natural-rational correspondences. They provide a
conscious view of God's purposes and methods of managing the created
universe. The rational mentality at level 3 is expressed in higher-order
concepts that are not easily understood a level 2.
For example, heaven and hell at level 2 are seen in terms of connection
to God. Those who feel a close connection and live their life accordingly,
are rewarded with eternal life in heaven. Similarly, those who cut
themselves off from God by rejecting a life based on His rules, are turned
away from God and have to suffer the consequences of their rejection by
suffering an eternal hell. But at level 3 mentality of heaven and hell, the
Writings explain that those who chose to live outside of God's order develop
a mind that avoids heaven at all cost. They hate how they feel in the purity
of altruistic loves which one experiences in heaven. They need an
environment where they can express their selfish loves and irrational
beliefs, and only then can they feel that the are really alive. In heaven
they feel dead, robbed of all the things they love.
Another example is the understanding of prayer. At level 1 and 2
mentality we believe that God can be influenced by our prayers. At level 3
mentality we realize that God already decides on every detail based on His
rules of order by which He manages the universe. There are no details left
out that need to be recited to Him .In fact He is the one who puts the ideas
in our conscious mind so that we can pray them. Praying is of benefit
because it helps us to acknowledge God's presence, and this raises our
rationality level. But prayer has no power over God to influence what will
happen next. God cannot change His mind about something, when He is viewed
from level 3 rationality.
Level 4 mentality is called phase 1 theistic psychology. It is
based on the extraction of knowledge from the literal meaning of the Writings. The
literal sentences of the Writings are written in natural-rational
correspondences. It is possible therefore to apply the method of
correspondences specified in the literal meaning of the Writings and extract
higher-order correspondences that are hidden within all Sacred Scripture as
Divine Speech. These higher order correspondences are called
spiritual-natural correspondences (level 4). This level is also called
interior-natural because it is located anatomically "within" the
natural-rational mind. The natural-rational mind is the consciousness that
reads and studies the Writings. Your reading and study of this book takes
place through mental operations located in that portion of your mind called
the "natural-rational" mind. Through this level of thinking you are able to
understand abstract and rational concepts such as those in theistic
psychology.
This natural-rational mind gives us the ability of reasoning with
scientific concepts. But only scientific concepts that are natural in
origin. This is the level of materialistic science. It may be called
rational, but not genuine rational. This is why we append the word natural
to it -- the natural-rational mind (level 3). In this way we can distinguish
it from genuine rational scientific concepts -- the spiritual-rational
(level 5) and the spiritual-natural (level 4). The levels are all within
each other when viewed from the laws correspondences applying to discrete
degrees (see Section xx). Level 4 is within level 3, and what is "within" is
always a discrete degree superior to that which is outside. This is why what
is outward or outside is also called lower, beneath, and inferior, while
what is inward or within is also called higher, above, and superior. This
rule also applies to the six levels of consciousness discussed here.
In other words, the Divine Human through the Spiritual Sun is the inmost
center of everything, and therefore the highest or most superior. When
Divine Speech from the Divine Rational Mind of the Divine Human "descends"
or "exteriorizes" into the created universe through the human mind, it goes
through discrete levels successively. When it reaches the outmost or
ultimate or "bottom" level, which is the most external relative to God, it
rests there and abides, that is, exists and operates. The descending Divine
Speech exteriorizes into the created universe and its first point of contact
is the celestial mind. Those who are conscious at that level in their mind
experience the Divine Speech as a form of understanding or enlightenment
regarding some topic or issue they are able to think about. This is the
highest science humans have available. It exists in the form of
celestial-rational correspondences (level 6, third heaven). Swedenborg
talked to these people when visiting the third heaven and he was aware that
their thoughts and perceptions were far above what he could understand. What
they said in celestial-rational correspondences (level 6) could only be
understood by Swedenborg through their correspondences at a lower level.
But Swedenborg made a happy discovery when he visited the first or
lowest of the three heavens (level 4). He observed that the people there think in
spiritual-natural correspondences, matching the spiritual language of Sacred
Scripture available to them there in spiritual script. I call this level of
mentality "theistic psychology phase1" (level 4) because it consists of the
extracted scientific knowledge from Sacred Scripture. Since level 4 is a
discrete degree "within" level 3, you can see that the Writings here on
earth written in a natural language, contain "within" them the
spiritual-natural correspondences. When Swedenborg wrote down the sentences
of the Writings he was using natural-rational correspondences (level 3). The
copy of what he wrote on earth also appeared to the people in the first
heaven (level 5). What content did they see? They were unable to see any
content that referred to natural-rational correspondences (level 3). They
were only able to read spiritual-natural sentences in their script. They
could not see any content referring to earth, history, culture, and
religion. Instead, they could only see what was a discrete degree "within,"
namely, their spiritual universal and scientific meaning.
The Writings reveal that the Divine Human has created a new organ within
the human rational mind. This new anatomical organ is called the
interior-natural organ of the mind. This new organ gives us a new human
capacity never before possible for human beings on earth. The
interior-natural organ is like a virtual heaven. Though it is
located within the natural mind, it receives input not from the physical
world, but from the spiritual world. Note from the chart above that the
spiritual and celestial minds (levels 5 and 6), are unconscious while we are
still conscious on earth. How then are we to know what are
spiritual-rational and celestial-rational correspondences? This is where the
new interior-rational organ comes in. This organ, being a virtual heaven, is
capable of consciously representing to us higher-order correspondences of
Divine Speech. In other words, with this new mental creation, the human race
is brought into a new evolutionary state of consciousness, one that is
capable of being enlightened to the highest heavens, even while we are still
developing on earth. This has enormous advantages and benefits for our
regeneration capacity. (For more discussion on this new organ see Section
xx.)
Now here is the same chart, but this time I have added some of the
principal ideas about God that occur with each level of understanding the
correspondences in Divine Speech.
|
↑
Read Chart From Bottom Up
↑ |
|
Level of Rational Mentality |
Sacred Scripture Correspondences |
Ideas
Regarding God, the Afterlife, Salvation and Sin |
|
6
phase three
theistic psychology |
unconscious
celestial-rational
correspondences
==
interior rational organ
==
third heaven
|
(to be filled in by future
research) |
|
5
phase two
theistic psychology
|
unconscious
spiritual-rational
correspondences
==
exterior rational organ
==
second heaven |
(to be filled in by future research) |
|
4
phase one
theistic psychology |
enlightened
spiritual-natural,
spiritual-rational,
celestial-rational
correspondences
==
interior natural organ
==
first heaven
|
(i) God is the infinite Divine Human who
operates our thoughts and feelings by connecting us to the minds of
others. The individual minds of the entire human race are kept
unconsciously interconnected so that they may influence one another. In
this way God manages the train of our thoughts, our decisions, our
perceptions, and our sensory environment. However, God creates the
feeling in us that we are alone in our mind and that our mental life is
our own alone. Thus He hides Himself from being discovered directly and
sensuously.
(ii) Every planet in the expanding physical universe is created to be
inhabited, but not necessarily in the same biochemical way as on this
earth. In the afterlife all people can meet in face to face
communication regardless of their earth of origin. People who have
similar feelings and thoughts are in communication with each other, but
they disappear from each other when they have contradictory thoughts or
feelings.
(iii) The quality of life in immortality is determined by who we can
communicate with, which is determined by what kinds of thoughts and
feelings we have. Those who can rationally understand spiritual truths
from Sacred Scripture are enlightened and are more willing to change
their character to agree with their enlightened understanding. Those who
are less willing to change their character are less enlightened,
understand spiritual truths less spiritually and more materialistically.
Temptations are used by the Divine Psychologist in our mind as a therapy
tool for character makeovers.
(iv) Praying is just one of several ways of acknowledging and
communicating with the Divine Human. Praying for specific things
is not practiced, but instead one strives to retain continuous awareness
of the Divine Human's co-presence in every moment and His
co-participation in every event that happens to us and every decision we
make.
|
|
3 Writings of
Swedenborg
|
conscious
natural-rational
correspondences
|
(i) God is the Divine Human in whom infinite
things make one. He is omnipotent, omniscient, and omnipresent. God has
incarnated in the natural world to make Himself physically visible,
accessible, touchable, and lovable to all humanity. The more we are
willing to love Him by obeying Him, the more He can enlighten us and
make us happy.
(ii) The physical world will continue endlessly as the seed bed for
human beings. A few hours after the body dies, every person is
resuscitated in the spiritual world where we are instructed in spiritual
truths about the Divine Human and about life in immortality.
(iii) Those who have developed a good character are
willing to accept the instruction and enter heaven where they live a
conjugial love with their soul mate, along with like-minded companion
couples. Those who have developed a bad character are unwilling to
accept the instruction, become insane, and sink into hell. The Lord uses
temptations to give people an opportunity to voluntarily give up their
hellish traits.
(iv) Prayer is of benefit to the individual who prays but has no
mollifying effect on God since God decides things solely on the basis of
omniscience through His Rational Laws of Providence and Permissions. God
cannot give away any of His power or holiness to any human beings. God
participates and manages all details, even the most minute, for
otherwise the universe would fall into chaos and disappear.
|
|
2 New
Testament
|
conscious
natural-
sensuous
correspondences |
(i) God manifests Himself in three Divine
Persons as one Godhead. God as Father is
invisible, unknowable, impersonal, partial to certain people, sometimes
vengeful and angry, sometimes merciful. God as the Son is
incarnated, visible, knowable, touchable, personal, impartial to all
people, never vengeful or angry, always merciful. The Holy Spirit
is felt in the rational mind and works within the mind to protect and
guide.
(ii) God's plan is to eventually destroy the physical world when all
the faithful then alive, and all the faithful who have been dead, will
be caught up to God in heaven, where they will continue their eternal
life, praising God and rejoicing forever. But the unfaithful or
non-believers will be caught up together into hell, where they will be
tortured to eternity.
(iii) Everyone who sincerely declares their faith in God the Son as
their Savior, Lord, and Master, is saved by Him and they receive eternal
life in heaven as a reward. Everyone else is cut off from God and thrown
into eternal hell. This is because God cannot look upon sin and they
have turned themselves away from God's order. God allows the devil to
tempt people in order to reprove them and encourage them to give up
evils they love.
(iv) God responds to people's prayers and sometimes makes miracles to
happen for them. Prayers are more effective when prayed together as a
group or Church. God is mollified by personal acts of charity and
sacrifice, so that He is more ready to ignore sins. God gives special
gifts to some individuals such as the power to heal or the wisdom to
lead.
|
|
1 Old
Testament
|
conscious
natural-
corporeal
correspondences
|
(i) God is invisible, unknowable,
impersonal, partial to certain people, sometimes vengeful and angry,
sometimes merciful. God complains a lot about people's sins and
threatens them with loss of livelihood, bad crops, sickness, and
sterility.
(ii) God will destroy this earth and create a new earth where all the
faithful will be resurrected and thereafter live forever in a glorious
kingdom on earth.
(iii) God rewards the faithful who perform all the required rituals
of religion. This reward is in terms of riches, popularity, power over
other nations, and many children to carry on the blood line. God tempts
people to test the loyalty of their faith. God rewards those who are
loyal and punishes those who fail the test.
(iv) God's Glory demands that He be worshipped by human beings. He
commands specific rituals that must be performed by the faithful under
penalty of death, sickness, or loss of crops and livelihood. Community
prayer rituals in groups are the most effective in mollifying God's
anger. Animal sacrifices are also to be carried out under certain
conditions.
|
|
↑ Read
Chart From Bottom Up
↑ |
For more discussion on the three levels of mentality in spirituality and
religion, see my book, Moses, Paul, and Swedenborg:
www.soc.hawaii.edu/leonj/leonj/leonpsy/instructor/gloss/moses.html
1.6.8.1
Thinking from Scientific
Revelation
Divine Speech in the passage below discusses the contrast between
thinking from natural-rational correspondences (level 3) about theistic
psychology vs. thinking from spiritual-natural
correspondences (level 4). It may be surprising to you that Divine
Speech discusses the negative and positive bias in science. But as you gain
more knowledge of the details you will see that Divine Speech always
discusses something about the human mind since the purpose of Divine Speech
is to influence the human mind and to transmit to us new knowledge that will
help us to regenerate. The Divine Human considers regeneration as the
central issue in our existence. Hence most of Sacred Scripture deals
exclusively with the human mind -- its anatomy, its functions, its
development, its modification and regeneration. In other words, theistic
psychology.
That the Old and New Testaments deal almost exclusively with theistic
psychology is not known to anyone except those who have read the Writings of
Swedenborg with a positive bias in science and are able to extract the underlying
scientific meaning in its sentences (see Section xx). It is easier to see
that the Writings of Swedenborg deal heavily with theistic psychology (level
4) because it is written in natural-rational correspondences (level 3) that
describe the human mind in a consistent and integrated rational account. But
the literal meaning of the sentences in the Writings (level 3) are filled
with natural, historical, and cultural references. These all disappear at
the level of theistic psychology (level 4). The natural-rational
correspondences of the literal sentences in the Writings also contain
gender-biased language and attitudes, which also disappear at level 4 in
theistic psychology. Every word, concept, expression and sentence in the
extracted correspondences from the Writings contain a universal reference to
the human mind and the individual -- every individual.
I will comment on several sub-sections of this one passage (AC 2568) so
that we can extract the universal scientific meaning of Divine Speech that
is contained within the literal sentences of the Writings.
Quoting from the Writings of Swedenborg:
AC 2568 [2] As regards man it is one thing to regard the doctrine of
faith from rational things, and altogether another to regard rational things
from the doctrine of faith.
"As regards man" refers to any human being who is studying theistic
psychology. "The doctrine of faith" refers to theistic psychology. "Rational
things" in this context refers to natural-rational ideas in contrast to
spiritual-rational ideas. Ideas expressed in natural-rational correspondences constitute materialistic
rationality, which is based on the appearances of spiritual ideas discussed in a
natural language.
But spiritual-rational ideas are based on scientific revelations in the Writings,
which constitute the knowledge of theistic psychology from Sacred Scripture.
This is called "the doctrine of faith" because the literal sentence is written
in accordance with history ("doctrine") and religion ("faith").
The inner scientific meaning, however, is universal.
Divine Speech is referring here to two modes of thinking when reading the
scientific revelations in the Writings. One is in the negative bias in science since it says,
"Let me see how the Writings are delusional and certainly not Divine." The other
mode of thinking is the positive bias in science since
it says, "I accept that the Writings may be rational and Divine. Now let me see
how I can understand it."
"To regard the doctrine of faith from rational things" refers to the negative
bias in science regarding theistic psychology. This is because "rational things" here
refers to natural-rational ideas (level 3), in contrast to spiritual-natural
ideas (level 4). "To regard from" refers to a critical analysis or examination
of the issue. To analyze scientific revelations with a materialistic perspective
(level 3 based on levels 1 and 2), is to operate within the negative bias
perspective. The reality of the spiritual world is denied by the materialistic
perspective and therefore nothing but a denial can result from analyzinf
scientific revelations from this perspective. That's why it is called the
negative bias in science.
But "to regard rational things from the doctrine of faith" refers to
the positive bias in science regarding theistic psychology. "Rational things" refers once
again to the natural-rational ideas of level 3 in which the Writings are
written. "Doctrine of faith" refers again to theistic psychology . To think
about the natural-rational correspondences of the Writings (level 3) in terms of
spiritual-natural ideas (level 4), is to think within the positive bias in
science
regarding theistic psychology.
Continuing with the passage which will now specify the consequences of
thinking one way or the other.
To regard the doctrine of faith from rational things is not to believe in
the Word, or in the doctrine thence derived, until one is persuaded from
rational things that it is so; whereas to regard rational things from the
doctrine of faith is first to believe in the Word, or in the doctrine
therefrom, and then to confirm the same by rational things.
The former is inverted order, and results in nothing being believed;
whereas the latter is genuine order, and causes the man to believe the better.
It is the former that is here meant by its being said that Abimelech should
die because of the woman; by which is signified that the doctrine of faith
would become null and void if the rational were consulted (n. 2516, 2538); but
the latter is meant by its being said that Abimelech gave flock and herd, and
menservants and maidservants; by which is signified that the doctrine of faith
was enriched with rational and natural goods and truths. (AC 2568)
The first paragraph confirms what we said above about the negative vs.
positive bias in science. "The Word" refers to the literal text of the Writings, and "the doctrine thence
derived" refers to theistic psychology when studied with the positive bias
in science.
"First to believe in the Word or in the doctrine therefrom" refers to the
positive bias in science when reading the Writings of Swedenborg or when studying theistic psychology.
"To confirm the same by rational things" refers to the effort to figure out
rationally what one is reading in theistic psychology. It is useless to read
without fully and clearly comprehending the Sections. When we read theistic
psychology with understanding we can confirm that it makes sense and that it is
true. But when we first deny the existence of scientific revelation and read
theistic psychology in that mentality, we can only end up denying the whole
thing.
The second paragraph in the passage above asserts that the negative
bias in science is
"inverted order" and when we examine theistic psychology from that inverted
order, "causes the man to believe nothing," which refers to rejecting the
validity of theistic psychology as a science. The positive bias in science is called
"genuine order" and causes us to "believe better" which means to think with
higher more rational correspondences about God. The rest of the paragraph shows
how Swedenborg analyzed the text of the Old Testament to show that the hidden
correspondences within the sentences are about scientific revelations, not
historical figures.
Continuing with the passage:
[3] These things are much treated of in the Word in its internal sense,
especially where Asshur and Egypt are spoken of; for the reason that while the
doctrine of faith is regarded from rational things, that is, while a man does
not believe until he is persuaded from them that it is so, it then not only
becomes null and void, but whatever is contained in it is also denied; whereas
when rational things are regarded from the doctrine of faith, that is, when a
man believes the Word, and afterwards the same things are confirmed by
rational things, the doctrine is then living and whatever is contained in it
is affirmed. (AC 2568)
The above paragraph asserts once again that reading scientific revelations
("the Word") in the negative bias mode cannot convince anyone that it is true.
But when you theistic psychology with a positive bias in science, accepting that it might
be true and valid, then we can confirm that they true by being able to
understand them rationally.
Continuing with the passage:
[4] There are therefore two principles; one of which leads to all folly and
insanity, and the other to all intelligence and wisdom. The former principle
is to deny all things, or to say in the heart that we cannot believe them
until we are convinced by what we can apprehend, or perceive by the senses;
this is the principle that leads to all folly and insanity, and is to be
called the negative principle. The other principle is to affirm the things
which are of doctrine from the Word, or to think and believe within ourselves
that they are true because the Lord has said them: this is the principle that
leads to all intelligence and wisdom, and is to be called the affirmative
principle. (AC 2568)
The above paragraph says that the negative
bias in science about scientific
revelations leads to a delusional conception of reality ("all folly and
insanity"), while the positive bias in science leads to rationality and sanity ("all
intelligence and wisdom"). What is called here "the negative principle" is
what we've been discussing as the negative bias in science. In contrast, "the
affirmative principle" is what we have called the positive bias in science.
The position that leads to sanity and intelligence is to adopt the positive
bias in science towards what is being presented in Sacred Scripture and in the knowledge
of theistic psychology that is based on it.
[5] The more they who think from the negative principle consult things
rational, the more they consult memory-knowledges, and the more they consult
things philosophical, the more do they cast and precipitate themselves into
darkness, until at last they deny all things. The causes of this are, that no
one can apprehend higher things from lower ones, that is, spiritual and
celestial things, still less Divine things, from lower ones, because they
transcend all understanding, and moreover everything is then involved in
negatives from that principle. On the other hand, they who think from an
affirmative principle can confirm themselves by whatever things rational, by
whatever memory-knowledges, and whatever things philosophic they have at
command; for all these are to them things confirmatory, and give them a fuller
idea of the matter. (AC 2568)
In the paragraph above Divine Speech tells us that when we operate with the
negative bias mode of thinking, we are in "darkness" which refers to the
inability to comprehend spiritual ideas or anything about the spiritual world
and how our life in immortality is dependent on our willingness to undergo
character reformation and regeneration while we are still living on earth (see
Section xx).
[6] Moreover there are some who are in doubt before they deny, and there
are some who are in doubt before they affirm. They who are in doubt before
they deny are they who incline to a life of evil; and when this life carries
them away, then insofar as they think of the matters in question they deny
them. But they who are in doubt before they affirm are they who incline to a
life of good; and when they suffer themselves to be bent to this by the Lord,
then insofar as they think about those things so far they affirm. As this
subject is further treated of in the verses which follow,. it is permitted of
the Lord's Divine mercy to illustrate them more fully there (see n. 2588). (AC
2568)
The final paragraph above asserts that when we think within the negative
bias mode we "incline to a life of evil." This means that we are then
incapable of judging what is right and wrong, good or bad. When we can't
judge between good and evil, then evil appears to us as good and vice versa.
IN this way we fall into a life of evil, meaning that we are not interested
in character reformation. We are satisfied where we are, and since we deny
the afterlife, we have no motivation for changing ourselves. We remain such
as we were born with an inherited character that has ties to the hells (see
Section xx). When we pass on and begin our new life of immortality, we have
nothing with us in this new life but our inherited character. Such as our
character is, such is the quality of life in eternity (see Section xx).
Study Questions:
Week 13 Readings: Section 1.6.3 to 1.6.8.1
-
Student 1: 1, 4, 7
-
Student 2: 2, 5, 8
-
Student 3: 3, 6, 9
13.1. List between 3 and 5 criteria that theistic psychology should have if it
is going to make it as a science in the future. Briefly explain each and then
give your assessment as to how theistic psychology as you know it, stacks up.
13.2. What is the method of psychobiological correspondence and how can it be
applied in theistic psychology.
13.3. What is the organic basis of human thoughts, emotions, and feelings?
13.4. Study Section 1.6.7, which describes some features of what life is like in
the afterlife of eternity. Discuss them. How do you react? How do your friends
react? Is this something to look forward to?
13.5. How do you react to the idea in Section 1.6.8 that "Sacred Scripture Is
the Source of Scientific Revelations"? Be sure to make a distinction between the
literal sense of Sacred Scripture (religion) and its spiritual sense (theistic
psychology).
13.6. Section 1.6.8 discusses how Divine Speech inflows into the mental world by
levels, and each level is lower in rationality than the level above it, until it
reaches the natural level of Sacred Scripture in a natural language. Describe
this process in your own words, as if you were giving a speech about it to
people interested in spirituality.
13.7. Discuss the 6 "Levels of Rational Mentality" in Section 1.6.8. Can you
comprehend these levels of thinking about God?
13.8. Section 1.8.9 discusses theistic science as an alternative to Bible-based
accounts of God and creation, which look only at the literal meaning. What is
your assessment of where this topic is going in the future?
13.9. Now that you are nearing completion of the course, what has been the
effect of studying theistic psychology this semester? What is your prognosis for
continuing the study and its mode of thinking?
1.6.9
History of the Concept of Dualism in Science
1.6.9.1
Substantive Dualism
This is a brief historical review of the concepts that
scientists have kept track of regarding dualism. Keep in mind that scientists
over the past few centuries have operated from the negative bias perspective
(see Section xx). They attempted to develop a theoretical position on
dualism which was therefore rationally untenable. A dualism that does not have
one of its components outside time and space, is clearly insufficient as an idea
for dualism. What is dualism from the positive bias perspective? The word
dualism refers to a system that has two separate or discontinuous components.
For instance, Swedenborg's dualism may be called substantive dualism
because it describes all phenomena in the universe as having two components.
Nothing in the universe can exist unless it has these two components. One
component is located in time and space -- the natural world, and the other
component is located outside time and space -- the spiritual-mental world of
eternity.
Take for instance a rock or mountain or planet, and its
constituent molecules, atoms, sub-atomic particles, energies, fields, and
propensities (see Section xx). These are time-space-matter coordinates. No
matter how micro you go inside each object endlessly, and no matter how macro
you go outside each object endlessly, you will never be able to cross
into the spiritual-mental world of eternity. This means that in substantive
dualism, the two worlds are in discrete degrees, not continuous (see Section
xx). There is no form of energy from the natural world that can cross or exert
an influence on the spiritual-mental world of eternity. Nothing in time-space
can be continuous with anything outside time-space. This is called the law
of discrete degrees and correspondences (see Section xx).
The object, event, property, or phenomenon is called the
effect, while the cause of that object or phenomenon is its substance. A rock on
the outside is matter in time-space, but on the inside it is rational substance
from the spiritual-mental world. Compare a rock we hold in the hand and a
question we ask about it. Both the question and the rock must have two
components, one in the natural world and the other in the spiritual-mental
world. This is by definition of substantive dualism. The rock's natural
component is made of matter from the sun, while the rock's spiritual-mental
component is made of substance from the spiritual-mental sun in eternity.
Similarly, the question that we verbalize must have the two components. The
natural component is the recordable physical sound we make when speaking the
question. The spiritual-mental component is the thinking operations of our
mental cognitive organ and and the willing operations of our mental affective
organ.
Does this mean that the inside of a rock, which is its
cause of existence, is a mental phenomenon in our mind?
The answer is yes, as long as you apply the theistic psychology principle
that spiritual = mental. The mental world is outside time and space. Sensations,
thoughts, and feelings are not brain phenomena at all, as it is supposed to be
in negative bias science and non-theistic psychology. In substantive dualism, it is
known that we are born dual citizens, or else we could not be human (see Section
xx). What makes us human is the ability to have thoughts and feelings that are
discontinuous from time and space. These thoughts and feelings are our
immortality. To be immortal means that our self and personality is not located
in time and space. There is nothing to survive at death because our self and
personality cannot die. Dying applies only to the physical body. When we are
born we acquire by birth two bodies which allow us two simultaneous existences
or lives. One life is in the spiritual body and the other is in the physical
body. We are conscious of our natural body and of our natural mind, but we are
not conscious of the spiritual body and our spiritual mind (see diagram xx
Section xx).
As our physical body grows, our mental body also grows. Our mental body is in
the spiritual world of eternity, also called the afterlife. Actually, it
is the development and maturation of the mental body through experiences, which
is the cause of the physical body growing. For instance, when our mental body
begins to fill out in its own shape or personality, at around mental age seven
or eight, the physical body loses all its childhood teeth, and replaces it with
adult teeth. When our mental body attains full mental adulthood, and we
begin to think what we want, the physical body reacts by producing our wisdom
teeth. It is the same with gender hormones and sexual response as our mental
world matures and our physical body responds.
How does the mental body act upon the physical body as a cause-effect
relationship between the outside temporary natural-physical component and the
inside eternal spiritual-mental component?
This interaction is governed by the laws of correspondences (see
section xx). Swedenborg is the only notable scientist we know
of, who has described this universal law in detail, and how it applies to all
cause-effect relations in the universe.
So, as we review the history of the concepts of dualism in
negative bias science, we can see where they go wrong in a rational attempt to
explain the difference between mind and body. Their attempt is futile in the
absence of the substantive dualism that separates time-space and outside
time-space, in the first place, and in the second place, specifies a scientific
relationship between the two. Without these two theoretical features, the
attempt to explain reality rationally must fail.
The mind is a general expression that in particular,
refers to the activity of our three mental organs with which we are born and
which are located in our spiritual-mental body in eternity. The word
experiences, or experiencing, refers to the holistic construction of
a self or personality, through the conglomeration and organized collection of
all our mental operations -- all our sensations (sensorimotor organ), all our
thoughts (cognitive organ), and all our feelings or intentions (affective
organ). Nothing whatsoever that is mental can get lost or disappear or die,
because all mental objects are outside time-space, hence permanent, eternal,
immortal, never-ending. Our self is immortal because it is a holistic
construction entirely from immortal objects -- sensations, thoughts, and
feelings. Not one of them that we ever experience, can ever be separated from
our self of which they are part. This makes each immortal human being unique to
eternity.
Does this mean that we should be able to produce a rock by
wanting to?
Yes, in the spiritual-mental world of eternity; No, in the
natural-physical world of time-space. Swedenborg confirmed through 27 years of
consciousness in both worlds, that every object in the afterlife world of
eternity, also called our spiritual mind, is instantaneously produced by the
thoughts and feelings of the people there. You can understand this idea when you
think about how you produce objects in your dreams or in your imagination. Those
objects are real appearances in your mental world or consciousness. Swedenborg
confirmed by multiple and repeated observation, that when people resuscitate
into the afterlife (see Section xx), their dreams and mental visions and
pictures, are visible to anyone who is standing around because the details of
the dream or content of the imagination are instantiated and appear around the
person. People in the afterlife who are similar or compatible in thoughts and
feelings appear to themselves to be together in a group or spiritual society
(see Section xx). Swedenborg visited such societies and what he saw was amazing.
The outward visual and sensory appearance of these societies varies in
correspondence with the level of mentality of the people in that society.
For instance, when Swedenborg was conscious in his
spiritual mind, he was able to descend in consciousness to the lower portions of
the spiritual-mental world. When he was in that state of mind he witnessed
himself among the societies of the human hells, and when he ascended to the
upper portions of the spiritual-mental world, he witnessed himself among the
societies of the human heavens. The hellish societies are called that because
their feelings, intentions, and thoughts are evil and delusional. At their
second death, which occurs shortly after the first death of the physical body,
people undergo an inevitable physiological change during which all their
heavenly traits are separated from all their hellish traits. They then are
forced to make a voluntary choice they cannot postpone or avoid. they must
choose either to give up the hellish traits or to give up the heavenly traits.
Before this process, people's hellish and heavenly traits are mixed up as it
were in the soup of personality, so that at one moment a person can be fiendish
and cruel, while at another moment that same person can be compassionate and
rational.
This ability of switching from one to the other depending
on the situation, is totally lost. This is why it is called the second death.
Once the choice is made, and the physiology of the process is completed,
whatever we don't choose -- our heavenly or our hellish traits -- is rendered
non-operational, inaccessible to the person's consciousness or actual life.
Swedenborg observed that people always choose on the basis of one ruling love,
and all the other loves that are compatible with it, remain attached to the
choice. The ruling love is in complete charge. Throughout your experiences and
choices prior to resuscitation, the ruling love arranges all things in your
intentions and desires to be compatible with it. For instance, if your ruling
love is to get ahead of others, you will develop a personality that is always
looking out for an advantage for yourself. Your habits of thinking will evolve
an attitude of life that justifies your actions and interactions, so that you
always end up on top. By the time you are resuscitated this ruling love will
have constructed a self or personality that is not willing to let go of it at
your second death. Hence every trait in your personality that is not compatible
with that ruling love, will be put to sleep.
What kind of person are you when your ruling love is a
hellish trait? (See Section xx).
But when you mature in your life on earth with a ruling
love that is heavenly, your self and personality will be constructed of heavenly
traits around the ruling love. For instance, if your ruling love is to take care
of those who are in your charge, the traits around this ruling love will be
compatible with it, as for example, you will feel responsible towards others in
your charge, you will protect them and give them good things, even if you have
to give up some of the things you might want at the moment, but which you can
see are selfish. Or to take still another example, suppose you love your career
and you work hard to advance in it by learning discipline and self-control, and
improving yourself as a person by overcoming temptations to be selfish and
undisciplined. Your ruling love in doing all this may be either hellish or
heavenly. The ruling love is hellish if you make yourself do all this work for
the sake of gaining more power or money for yourself, at the expense of others.
If you cheat for instance, or take advantage of others by being sly and
manipulative, you know you are working hard for the sake of yourself and you
have no compassion for the others you are cheating or taking advantage of.
Or else, your ruling love in your career may be for the
sake of being useful to society, or being a good person who pulls their own
share of the load. You might still like the power and the money -- there is
nothing wrong with that, but you don't subordinate the other people to the power
and money you can obtain. You make distinctions, and you refuse to do what hurts
others for the sake of gaining advantage. You will limit yourself to that kind
of career choices and actions that help you but don't hurt others unfairly. You
can beat others in a fair competition, and still feel compassionate and good
will towards them. If you feel this way, and you are not faking yourself out,
then you know that your ruling love is heavenly. You know that your second death
you will choose the heaven in your mind, not the hell.
1.6.9.2
Prior Versions of Dualism in the Negative bias in
science
A useful discussion of dualism will be found in these two
articles:
Dualism (philosophy of mind) From Wikipedia:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dualism_(philosophy_of_mind)
and
Dualism in Descartes and Swedenborg by Dr. Ian Thompson
www.newdualism.org/papers/I.Thompson/dualism-descartes-swedenborg.pdf
The Wikipedia article starts out with this sentence:
"In the philosophy of mind, dualism is a set of views
about the relationship between mind and matter, which begins with the claim
that mental phenomena are, in some respects, non-physical."
Note that right from the first sentence, the article
acknowledges itself as looking at dualism from the negative bias perspective. It
says that dualism "begins with the claim that mental is non-physical." If the
article were written from the positive bias perspective, it would say that
materialism is the claim that the mental is the continuous with the physical.
This shows to you that either way, negative or positive perspective on dualism,
we are dealing with a bias. This is important for you to realize because until
now materialism has been presented to you as scientific, while dualism has been
presented to you as a "claim" that is not scientific. But now you can see that
materialism is the negative bias in science towards the existence of the non-physical
eternity. Materialism or monism in science is therefore not more scientific than
dualism. This conclusion is opposed and counteracted continuously by those
who operated within the negative bias in science. It's important therefore that
we be aware of this.
Once we begin to understand that materialism is a negative
bias not a scientific proof, we empower ourselves to be able to adopt the
positive bias in science. As long as we don't clearly see that the non-theistic and
materialistic attitude is a bias, we feel hesitant to even consider adopting the
positive bias in science. We are realistically concerned that we are no longer being
scientific when we discuss God and eternity in science. But when we see
rationally that materialism is a bias and not a proof, we begin to wonder what
motivates scientists to maintain this negative bias in science? Why are they so aversive to
the idea of the dualism and the afterlife? Different scientists may have
different reasons. But the important thing is that you have liberated yourself
from the negative bias in science intellectual tyranny that was taught to you exclusively
in your science education. Note that you were not given the opportunity to hear
both sides of the issue! Note that you were never told that the materialistic
anti-God, anti-immortality stance of science is a bias. You were never told that
there is a positive bias in science called dualism, and that it is also a scientific
possibility.
I think we should be more balanced in our science
education curriculum. We should teach both the negative and the positive bias in
all science courses where method, history, and definition is discussed. I can
understand why this has not been done so far, namely, because the works of
Swedenborg are still not known in science. Part of the reason they are still
unknown is that they have been intentionally and vigorously kept out, due to the
negative bias in science. But I predict that in the future more and more
scientists will allow themselves to recognize that their current materialism is
a negative bias in science. This will make them more receptive to considering the positive
bias in science through the Writings of Swedenborg. However, since these Writings are
written as Sacred Scripture, the literal sense will continue to be a barrier to
most people. Hence the change will come through theistic psychology and theistic
physics, theistic information science, theistic astronomica, theistic biology,
and so on. There have been advances in each of these fields so far, as you can
see from the Index and
Readings in Volume 1.
Within each scientific discipline there will be new
proposals within the positive bias in science, and eventually this will gain ground over
the old monism. All this might take several decades, if not more, due to the
tenacity with which materialism hangs on in the human mind. Swedenborg reports
multiple conversations he had with materialists and monists when they are
resuscitated and also after their second death (see Section xx). At first they
deny they are in the world of the afterlife and eternity. They concoct various
fantastic explanations for what they see, like reasoning that they somehow have
been transported to an island, or another planet, or other naturalistic ideas.
Or else that they are still dying and in a coma, and so on. But after awhile the
sensuous phenomena and events that occur around them compel them to acknowledge
that they are now in a different world. This is most effectively communicated to
them when they meet up with their dead relatives and friends.
Nevertheless, most them continue to deny that there is a
heaven and a hell, a God, or other rational truths such as those in Sacred
Scripture from Divine Speech. They are instructed in the rational ideas of
Sacred Scripture and the human mind, but they are unwilling to receive these
ideas. They quickly take themselves out of such instructional atmosphere, and
pursue those states of the human mental world that are not rational. These are
called the hells of the human psyche. Anyone who believes in materialism at the
second death, give up all rational and heavenly ideas, and continue life in an
irrational mental state where they experience much suffering from delusions and
the delusions of the companions with whom they are mentally locked by similar
ruling loves against the good and the true, against God and the innocence of our
relationship to God in our heaven.
The entire history of dualism in negative bias science is
therefore a history of rejection and failure. This is not due to dualism being
wrong, but to the fact that nothing whatsoever can be known about the mental
world of eternity, through the physical senses and data and explanations based
exclusively on them. The rationality of materialistic science is not due to the
negative bias. Scientists think rationally due to the direct effect of Divine
Speech in their cognitive organ (see Section xx). You can understand this better
if you think about the sentences you speak or read. What allows you to make up a
sentence that just about anyone in that language could understand? It's your
knowledge of grammar or syntax for that language. You acquired that syntax
unconsciously within the first two years of your socialization process. Once
internalized, the syntactic rules allow you to generate an endless number of
unique sentences, and you can understand as many when constructed by others who
also internalized the same syntactic rules. So you can speak and understand
sentences not because you are a genius or a linguist, but because you know the
syntactic rules that generate sentences.
It is the same with the rational thinking of scientists,
lawyers, and managers. Their reasoning process is rational because the rules or
syntax of rational thinking are present in their spiritual mind. They get there
directly from Divine Speech (see Section xx). Once there, they organize and
arrange the reasoning process we carry out consciously in our natural mind. So
this is the source of the rational aspects of science, engineering, and
government in our society. Despite the rational insanity of materialism
(assuming that dualism is the reality), society continues to survive and
progress, though at an amazing cost of inefficiency, human decadence, suffering,
depression, and ill health. All these are the symptoms of irrationality due to
materialism and other ant-eternity stances and lifestyles.
Continuing with the history of dualism,
Rene Descartes (1596-1650) is a
name frequently associated with dualism. According to the Wikipedia entry,
Descartes held that
"the mind is a nonphysical substance. Descartes was the first to clearly
identify the mind with consciousness and self-awareness and to distinguish
this from the brain, which was the seat of intelligence. Hence, he was the
first to formulate the mind/body problem in the form in which it still exists
today."
The Western version of the history of dualism goes back to
the ancient Greeks. According to the Wikipedia article,
Plato
In the dialogue Phaedo, Plato formulated his famous doctrine of eternal
Forms as distinct and immaterial substances of which the objects and other
phenomena that we perceive in the world are nothing more than mere shadows.
Plato's doctrine was the prototypical conception of all future manifestations
of, what is now called, substance dualism in ontology.
Aristotle
What is important from the perspective of philosophy of mind is that Aristotle
does not believe that intellect can be conceived of as something material. He
argues as follows: if the intellect were material then it could not receive
all of the forms. If the intellect were a specific material organ (or part of
one) than it would be restricted to receiving only certain kinds of
information, as the eye is restricted to receiving visual data and the ear is
restricted to receiving auditory data. Since the intellect is capable of
receiving and reflecting on all forms of data, then it must not be a physical
organ and, hence, it must be immaterial.
Both Plato and Aristotle realized that the mental world of
awareness and thinking must be immaterial, that is, not made of matter in
time and space, as is the body and the objects of our perception. They
understood this not from materialistic or empirical observations, but from
rational proof. Continuing with Wikipedia history of dualism:
From Neoplatonism to Scholasticism
Early Christianity seems to have struggled to come to terms with the
identification of a unique position with regard to the question of the
relationship between mind and body, just as it struggled to define the
relationship of the ontological status of Christ himself (see homoousianism,
homoiousianism, Arianism, etc). A consensus seemed to emerge around, what is
now called, Neoplatonism in the early Middle Ages. The doctrines of
Neoplatonism were essentially minor modifications on Plato's general ideas
about the immortality of the soul and the nature of the Forms. The Neoplatonic
Christians identified the Forms with souls and believed that the soul was the
substance of each individual human being, while the body was just a shadow or
copy of these eternal phenomena.
This paragraph shows that that the perspective of dualism
in the history of science has always been familiar with the rational idea that
the physical world and our body in it, is a "shadow or copy" of the spiritual
body we have in eternity ("eternal phenomena"). Swedenborg wrote that we are
spirits in a material body looking out at the outside world through our senses.
It is not the body that sensates and thinks, but the spirit within the body.
Thomas Aquinas
For Aquinas, the soul (or intellect) remained the substance of the human
being, but, somewhat similarly to Aristotle's proposal, it was only through
its manifestation inside the human body that a person could be said to be a
person. While the soul (intellect or form) could exist independently of the
body (unlike in Aristotle) the soul by itself did not constitute a person.
Hence, Aquinas suggested that instead of saying "St. Peter pray for us" one
should rather say something like "soul of St. Peter pray for us", since all
that remained of St. Peter, after his death, was his soul. All things
connected with the body, such as personal memories, were cancelled out with
the end of one's corporeal existence.
Here is where the speculations of Aquinas begin to throw
things of the rational path in the history of ideas. Note from the above that he
made up the notion that in the afterlife we are souls lacking a body, and
therefore we are not a person with memories and personality. This is a pretty
depressing idea! We know from Swedenborg's observations that we are resuscitated
a few hours after the death of the body and that we find ourselves at that
point, in a spiritual-mental body in a rational ether created by the Spiritual
Sun (see Section xx). From the fantastic speculations of Aquinas many false
theories have arisen about the afterlife in the mind of those who think highly
of him. One of these ideas is that when we die the soul goes to some kind of a
holding tank, where it awaits the end of the physical world. When that happens
all the souls, or only the deserving or chosen souls, will now get their
physical body back, or one like it, and they will then continue life forever in
an immortal body on earth. One of the worst and most repulsive idea that came
through this line of thinking, is that some people are born "predestined" by God
to go either to heaven or to hell when the world ends. This idea attributes to
God what is abhorrent to love and justice. Why would God do such an awful thing
as to predestine some people to be born for hell, with nothing they can do about
it, even if they try to become good people?
Continuing from the Wikipedia article on dualism:
"Substance dualism
Substance dualism is a type of dualism most famously defended by Descartes,
which states that there are two fundamental kinds of substance: mental and
material. The mental does not have extension in space, and the material cannot
think. Substance dualism is a viewpoint which contradicts physicalism, one of
the most popular views in modern philosophy of mind. (...) Substance dualism
is a philosophical position compatible with most theologies which claim that
immortal souls occupy an independent "realm" of existence which is distinct
from that of the physical world."
Here we have several accurate facts about dualism: (1) two
substances or worlds, one material in time-space, the other spiritual-mental in
eternity. (2) The spiritual-mental world of eternity has no "extension in
space," which means that space is part of the physical world and does not exist
in the mental world of eternity, which is outside time and space. (3) Thoughts
are not material or time-space events or objects. They are eternal, spiritual,
mental, immortal. (4) The dualism of material-immaterial, or physical-mental, or
temporal-eternal, is contradicted by physicalism, which is the negative bias in
modern science. (5) The soul is immortal and when it loses its physical body it
goes on living in an "independent realm of existence" that is outside the
time-space world.
Note that these facts are accurate although they are
general rather giving specific details of the world of eternity. This is because
no such details can be accessed by anyone conscious in the natural mind. Only
after resuscitation, when the natural mind falls inoperative, and our conscious
awareness awakens in the spiritual mind, only then, can we access directly, by
sensuous consciousness, the details of life there. Swedenborg was the only human
being who, prepared since childhood by Divine intervention, was capable of
double consciousness from age 57 to 84, compiling some thirty volumes of daily
notes of his observations and experiments, and their rational explanation, in
relation to Sacred Scripture (see Section xx). To distinguish the earlier
versions of dualism, like substance dualism, I use the phrase substantive
dualism to refer to Swedenborg's reports (see Section xx).
Continuing from the Wikipedia article on dualism:
"Property dualism
Property dualism asserts that when matter is organized in the appropriate way
(i.e. in the way that living human bodies are organized), mental properties
emerge. Hence, it is a sub-branch of emergent materialism. Different versions
of property dualism describe this in different ways. Epiphenomenalism asserts
that while material causes give rise to sensations, volitions, ideas, etc.,
such mental phenomena themselves cause nothing further: they are causal
dead-ends. Interactionism, on the other hand, allows that mental causes can
produce material effects, and vice-versa."
This shows how the substance dualism of Plato, Aristotle,
Aquinas, and Descartes are completely destroyed by modern views within the
negative bias in science. The notion of "emergent materialism" defines the
mental world of thoughts and feelings as nothing but another form of physical
energy, matter, and space. This notion called "epiphenomenalism" asserts
that sensations, thoughts, and intentions are material and "nothing further." Sp
this idea should not be called dualism ("property dualism") but quasi-dualism,
which means not real dualism.
Continuing from the Wikipedia article on dualism:
Predicate dualism
Predicate dualism is the view espoused by most non-reductive physicalists,
such as Donald Davidson and Jerry Fodor, who maintain that while there is only
one ontological category of substances and properties of substances (usually
physical), the predicates that we use to describe mental events cannot be
redescribed in terms of (or reduced to) physical predicates of natural
languages. If we characterize predicate monism as the view subscribed to by
eliminative materialists, who maintain that such intentional predicates as
believe, desire, think, feel, etc., will eventually be eliminated from both
the language of science and from ordinary language because the entities to
which they refer do not exist, then predicate dualism is most easily defined
as the negation of this position. Predicate dualists believe that so-called
"folk psychology", with all of its propositional attitude ascriptions, is an
ineliminable part of the enterprise of describing, explaining and
understanding human mental states and behavior.
This shows how inventive scientists can be in trying to
get around substance dualism. This position realizes that it is not valid to
reduce mental events to physical brain events, and yet it wants to hold on to
materialism or physicalism. So it asserts that sensations and feelings, though
not real because mental, nevertheless are to be treated as if real, if we want
to understand how human beings think and talk. According to this view, when you
say that you like something, you're not having a feeling but pretending to have
one, or talking as if you had one, or believing the illusion that you have one.
All this is amazingly far fetched, and all of it, in order to get away from the
reality of the two worlds, one in space-time, the other outside of it.
Continuing from the Wikipedia article on dualism:
"Parallelism
Psycho-psychical parallelism is a very unusual view about the interaction
between mental and physical events which was most prominently, and perhaps
only truly, advocated by Gottfried Wilhelm von Leibniz. Like Malebranche and
others before him, Leibniz recognized the weaknesses of Descartes' account of
causal interaction taking place in a physical location in the brain.
Malebranche decided that such a material basis of interaction between material
and immaterial was impossible and therefore formulated his doctrine of
occasionalism, stating that the interactions were really caused by the
intervention of God on each individual occasion. Leibniz idea is that God has
created a pre-established harmony such that it only seems as if physical and
mental events cause, and are caused by, one another. In reality, mental causes
only have mental effects and physical causes only have physical effects. Hence
the term parallelism is used to describe this view."
This perspective is in the mode of theistic science,
though not fully accurate when viewed from the perspective of Swedenborg's
Writings. But it correctly identifies the impossibility of Descartes' version of
dualism, because in substance dualism, the two worlds of time and eternity, are
discontinuous, They cannot touch at some point in the brain, as Descartes
thought. The solution that Leibniz and Malebranche came up with is that God
coordinates the two worlds of time and of eternity just so that they may work
together. Swedenborg Writings give us the complete particulars or mechanisms by
which God does this work of coordination, namely, the laws of correspondences to
Divine Speech (see Section xx). Divine Speech is Divine Truth, which enters the
mental world through spiritual light streaming from the Spiritual Sun, that
activates all causes and effects in the universe. Divine Speech enters the
universe from the celestial mind of the human race. From there the laws of
correspondences determine how the degree below the celestial will react, then
below the spiritual, then below the natural, and finally into the physical
universe through time, space, and matter.
This descent of Divine Speech is the cause of all
phenomena in both worlds. The universe at all levels is nothing but a reaction
by correspondence to Divine Speech. Every thing that exists has three components
that constitute the whole or unity of the thing (see Section xx). These
three things are in discrete degrees of correspondence relative to each other
and are thus interlocked in operation as source is locked to the cause which is
locked to the effect. IN the effect, cause and source are present in
simultaneous order (see section xx). Without the knowledge of discrete degrees
linked by correspondences to Divine Speech, there is no scientific way of
explaining how the physical and the mental interact, or how the temporal, which
is the physical body, interacts with the eternal, which is the sensation that
comes from it in our mental world. This difficulty is seen in the next quote.
Continuing from the Wikipedia article on dualism:
Arguments against dualism: Argument from causal interaction
Varieties of dualism in which mind can causally affect matter have come
under strenuous attack from different quarters, especially starting in the
20th century. How can something totally immaterial affect something totally
material? That's the basic problem of causal interaction. We can analyze the
problem here in three parts.
First, it is not clear where the interaction would take place. For example
, burning my fingers causes pain. Apparently there is some chain of events,
leading from the burning of skin, to the stimulation of nerve endings, to
something happening in the peripheral nerves of my body that lead to my brain,
to something happening in a particular part of my brain, and finally resulting
in the sensation of pain.
But pain is not supposed to be spatially localizable. So where does the
interaction take place? If you were to respond, "It takes place in the brain,"
then I might say, "But I thought pains weren't located anywhere." And you, as
a dualist, might stick to your guns and say, "That's right, pains aren't
located anywhere; but the brain event that immediately leads to the pain is
located in the brain." But then we have a very strange causal relation on our
hands. The cause is located in a particular place but the effect is not
located anywhere. Perhaps this is not a devastating criticism.
This shows the difficulty of explaining any sensation that
we experience when signals from our burned skin arrive to the brain. There is no
possibility of the chemical or electrical signal somehow entering the mind. This
would violate the law of discrete degrees between the mental and the physical.
There is no continuity between them so a signal cannot go from one to the other.
Swedenborg's solution was that every pattern of signals ending up in the brain
cells from the senses, is actually composed of smaller signals acting together
as a pattern of input. Each of these signals is a physical event, hence an
effect from a spiritual-mental cause. Each neural action in the brain has a
temporal component in time-space called the effect, and a spiritual-mental
component outside time called the cause. No thing is a thing unless it has these
two components. So when one is modified, so is the other, since it is the same
object being modified as a whole.
This view is quite different from that of Leibniz and
Malebranche, discussed above. They thought that the two worlds were separate and
independent creations, and that God saw to it that whatever happened in one
world would have an effect in the other world. For instance, if we had the
desire to touch something, God would know this, and would make our hand move
accordingly, so that we had the illusion that our hand is moving from our
intention to move it. But Swedenborg's view is that my moving hand itself is
nothing unless it has two sub-things it is made of. My hand moving has a cause
component, which is the mental event of my wanting to move it. This cause
component is outside the physical world, in eternity. Simultaneously, my moving
hand also has an effect component, which is in physical time and space. The
moving hand is therefore a dual object, partly spiritual-mental and partly
physical-temporal. The cause and the effect of every physical event are together
in the event, giving it its existence. Neither can exist without the other. The
existence of a thing starts when it acquires these two things -- its cause and
its effect, also called, its substance and form (see Section xx). Let's continue
to examine further how the negative bias in science tries to handle this problem.
Continuing from the Wikipedia article on dualism:
"So let's look at a second problem about the
interaction. Namely, how does the interaction take place? You might think,
"Well, that's a matter for science -- scientists will eventually discover the
connection between mental and physical events." But philosophers also have
something to say about the matter: the very idea of a mechanism which explains
the connection between the mental and the physical would be very strange, at
best. Why would it be strange? Compare it to a mechanism that we do
understand. Take a very simple causal relation, such as when the cue ball
strikes the eight ball and causes it to go into the pocket. Here we can say
that the cue ball has a certain amount of momentum as its mass moves across
the pool table with some velocity, and then that momentum is transferred to
the eight ball, which then heads toward the pocket. Now compare this to the
situation in the brain, where we want to say a decision causes some neurons to
fire and thus causes my body to move across the room. The intention "I will
cross the room now," is a mental event and, as such, it does not have physical
properties such as force. If it has no force, then how on earth could it cause
any neuron to fire? Is it by magic? How could something without any physical
properties have any physical effects at all?"
Here we see the impossibility of explaining how discrete
degrees, or discontinuous systems, can be functionally related like cause and
effect are related. First, note the error in the logic about the cue ball
hitting the eight ball and causing it to move toward the pocket. The cue ball
collides with the eight ball which then starts moving in a certain direction.
Swedenborg points out that these two types of actions are not cause and effect,
but two effects correlating with each other, or following each other in
sequence. One physical event cannot be the cause of another physical event
because cause and effect are in discrete degrees. All causes in the universe are
in the spiritual-mental world and all effects in the universe are in the natural
world. In this case, the cause of the eight ball heading towards the pocket
is not the cue ball, but the intention of the pool player.
The quote above shows the writer's puzzlement in figuring
out how a mental event such as an intention, can be the cause of a physical
event, such as firing neurons that move my hand that move the cue stick that
strikes the cue ball. How do we get from the intention to the motor action? The
writer continues to specify the puzzle as follows:
"The problem is that if we have something totally nonphysical causing a
bunch of neurons to fire, then there is no physical event which causes the
firing. That means that some physical energy seems to have appeared out of
thin air. Even if we say that my decision has some sort of mental energy, and
that the decision causes the firing, we still haven't explained where the
physical energy, for the firing, came from. It just seems to have popped into
existence from nowhere."
Exactly. The effect seems to just "pop into existence from
nowhere." But we know from the scientific revelations in the Writings of
Swedenborg that the brain does not have a coherent integrity of its own, so that
no pattern in the brain can fire at all from itself or from the body. The brain
is a dead organic mechanism made of protein matter, electricity, and space. It
does not get activated by anything. Sensory input cannot occur on its own. Every
little act of perception and sensation has a mental cause and all the little
acts are put together in a rational sequence controlled and determined by a
mental process which descends as cause into time-space as effect. The neural
firing in the brain is not the cause or source of the sensation in the mind. The
neural firing is the effect in the brain of the cause in the mind.
For instance, what our eyes see does not depend merely on
what's in the room, but also on what's in our mind. When our mind is asleep or
distracted, our eyes do not see things right in front of us. In order for the
eye to pick up a visual signal from the environment, our mind must make the eye
ready to perform the act of seeing. Without this cause in the mind, the eye in
the effect cannot see anything. Similarly, when you move your hand to pick up
something, the muscles would not work at all, at even less in coordination,
unless the mental intention of preparedness to move, were first present as
cause. So, every activity of the senses, organs, nerves, or brain, is an effect
of a prior mental event that must precede it as cause precedes effect.
The article ends with the statement that dualism cannot
continue to survive as a viable scientific idea in modern science, first because
no good explanations have been provided for how the worlds interact, and second,
because dualism violates "a general heuristic principle of science: the causal
closure of the physical world." this is nothing but the negative bias in
science which
wants closure of science within the physical world and exclusion of anything
else. Note however that the article does not mention Swedenborg, even though he
is the only one who has proposed a rational solution. In addition to providing a
rational solution, Swedenborg also confirmed it by empirical observation, as
described in the Section on resuscitation below (Section 1.7). Other
observational methods Swedenborg had access to are indicated in various
quotations taken from his reports -- see
Selections to the Writings Sacred Scripture
Keyed to Theistic Psychology Subjects for the entry EXPERIMENTS
CONDUCTED BY SWEDENBORG IN SPIRITUAL WORLD; EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE.
1.6.9.3
Dualism and Consciousness
Another entry in the Wikipedia, is relevant to considering additional ideas
about dualism and consciousness. This is the entry on Martin Heidegger. Quoting
from the Wikipedia entry: (the links give direct access to other entries in
Wikipedia)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heidegger
"Heidegger (1889-1976)
Influences:
Pre-Socratics,
Plato,
Aristotle,
Kant,
Hegel,
Kierkegaard,
Nietzsche,
Husserl
Influenced:
Jean-Paul Sartre,
Jacques Derrida,
Maurice Merleau-Ponty
Michel Foucault
Beyond his relation to
phenomenology, Heidegger is
regarded as a major or indispensable influence on
existentialism,
deconstruction,
hermeneutics and
postmodernism. He attempted to
reorient Western philosophy away from
metaphysical and
epistemological and toward
ontological questions, that is,
questions concerning the meaning of
being, or what it means
"to-be". Much controversy has surrounded his status as a prominent academic
member of the
Nazi Party."
We need to examine the meaning of the contrast mentioned here, namely,
metaphysical-epistemological vs. ontological in the context of
consciousness (phenomenology) and what is human reality (existentialism,
postmodernism, etc.). According to the Wikipedia article:
"The phenomenological approach to philosophy can be briefly sketched
as an attempt to perceive experience unmediated by any prior knowledge and
thus as a way of trying to reach the thing itself, bypassing every abstract
theoretical assumption of it. Edmund Husserl was a founder and major exponent
of this philosophical branch, and also Heidegger's teacher and mentor."
In other words, in relation to theistic psychology, the phenomenological
approach may be identified with a type of sensuous consciousness of God, which
contrasts with the rational consciousness of God (see Section xx). This topic is
also covered under the topic of sensuous spirituality vs. rational spirituality
(see Section xx). It is known from the Writings Sacred Scripture that the
current human race on earth is characterized as the split-brain spiritual race
to contrast it with the original race on earth called the whole brain celestial
race (see Section xx). The celestial human race on earth had sensuous
consciousness of heaven and and the spiritual world of eternity. This ability
was subsequently lost, and rational spirituality could then evolve in the new
spiritual race. After the Incarnation event in human evolution, the human mind
was modified so that access to heaven in eternity now was possible only through
rational consciousness of God (see see Sections
1.6.8 and
1.8.4.2 and
1.8.6 and
2.19
and
3.7.2.2
and
3.10.1 and
4.4.5
and
4.4.6.1 and
5.0.6 and
5.1.1.5.1 and
13.0.11.1.1). Rational consciousness of God is
defined by Sacred Scripture, especially its correspondential sense (see Section xx).
The desire for sensuous consciousness of God leads people today to a
phenomenological approach to spirituality and higher consciousness. Among these
efforts are meditation, religious piety, altered states of consciousness,
induced swooning, extreme physical disciplines, near death experiences (NDEs),
witnessing and confirming miracles, mediumship, psychic phenomena,
transcendentalism, rituals and secret incantations, group bonding and
fellowship, and perhaps others (see my analysis in The Man of the Field.
Reformation: The Struggle Against Nonduality at: www.soc.hawaii.edu/leonj/v1ch1-nonduality.html
)
The phenomenological approach to higher consciousness of reality assumes that
higher consciousness is a mental state that is continuous with the consciousness
we have in our natural mind. This view says that all consciousness is a
continuity, from rock through animal through human to God. But we know from the
Writings Sacred Scripture that the universe, the mind, all creation, is layered
in discrete degrees (see Section xx). The levels are discontinuous. No matter
how much we endlessly keep improving our consciousness in the natural mind, we
can never enter the consciousness of the spiritual mind. Also, no matter how
much we improve our sensuous consciousness of God and reality, we cannot even
begin to experience our rational consciousness of God. These two are in discrete
degrees. And since the new heavens of the human race are made out of rational
consciousness of Sacred Scripture and God, it is clear that phenomenology cannot
bring us closer to an understanding of reality and living life in its highest
human form and potential.
Continuing from the Wikipedia article on Heidegger:
"The question of being was so to speak revived by Heidegger after being
eclipsed by the metaphysical tradition from Plato to Descartes, and even more
recently during the Enlightenment. Heidegger sought to explain being in terms
of time, and thus to discover its real essence or meaning, that is, its
intelligibility for us."
The philosophical system Heidegger pursued and championed is therefore the
opposite of Swedenborg's philosophical system, which is in a form that carries
Divine revelation, and hence called the Writings Sacred Scripture (see Section
xx). Heidegger's system is the opposite of the Divine system given in the
Writings Sacred Scripture because it locates the foundation of being in
time rather than in eternity. His error is to suppose that we have no access to
eternity because we are beings of time. This is indeed correct for sensuous
being or consciousness, but it is not correct for rational being or
consciousness. All rational states belong to eternity and are outside time and
space, just as thoughts and feelings are not in the brain, matter, or space, but
a discrete degree within them or apart from them (see Section xx). The mental
world of sensations and thoughts consists of rational ether outside time and
space, while the brain world of sensory input and neural action, consists of
electro-chemical activity within time and space (see Section xx). God is
omnipresent, not in space but apart from space (see Section xx).
It is interesting to pursue what phenomenology became under its next phase of
development. This may be seen in the Wikipedia entry for Husserl:
"Edmund Husserl (1859-1938) (German philosopher, known as the
"father" of phenomenology.)
In a later period, Husserl began to wrestle with the complicated
issues of intersubjectivity (specifically, how communication about an
object can be assumed to refer to the same ideal entity) and tries new
methods of bringing his readers to understand the importance of
Phenomenology to scientific inquiry (and specifically to
Psychology) and what it means to "bracket" the natural attitude.
The Crisis of the European Sciences is Husserl's unfinished work that
deals most directly with these issues. In it, Husserl for the first
time attempts a historical overview of the development of
Western philosophy and
science,
emphasizing the challenges presented by their increasingly
(one-sidedly)
empirical and
naturalistic orientation. Husserl declares that mental and
spiritual reality possess their own reality independent of any
physical basis, and that a
science of the spirit ('Geisteswissenschaft')
must be established on as scientific a foundation as the
natural sciences have managed."
Here we see that Husserl restores to phenomenology what
Heidegger has removed, namely, the idea that a spiritual-rational reality
exists along with, or independently of, the natural world. The
phenomenological world is now to encompass a substantive dualism of two
worlds, one in nature and time, the other in the human mind and eternity. This
idea then raises the notion of a rational phenomenology, which would mean that
we must have a dual mind, one natural, the other spiritual. The spiritual mind
is rational and requires that we "bracket out" the sensuous from reality. In
this way Husserl proposes a phenomenology of the spiritual through the
rational, not the sensuous. This idea is found in the Writings of Swedenborg
(1668-1772), almost two centuries before Husserl and Heidegger, but the
Wikipedia article does not note this fact. But it does note this historical
irony between the reversal of positions between Heidegger and Husserl:
"Professor Husserl was denied the use of the library at Freiburg as a
result of the anti-Jewish legislation the National Socialists (Nazis) passed
in April 1933. His former pupil and Nazi Party member, Martin Heidegger,
informed Husserl that he was discharged. Heidegger (whose philosophy Husserl
considered to be the result of a faulty departure from, and grave
misunderstanding of Husserl's own teachings and methods) removed the
dedication to Husserl from his most widely known work, Being and Time,
when it was reissued in 1941."
Heidegger's Nazi stance is obviously in conflict with
Husserl's notion of a spiritual-mental world that is in eternity, an idea that
forms the basis of all religions based on Sacred Scripture. The ideology of
being that is based in time and nature can be consistent with the Nazi
ideology of denying human dignity to some people. Such a horrific political
stance can be justified by a morality based on the principle of survival of the
fittest. But this kind of inhumanity is prohibited by a civilization based, not
on nature and time, but on rational principles that are outside time and
locality. This civilized attitude is requires the acknowledgement of substantive
dualism and a positive bias in science toward Sacred Scripture having a universal,
scientific, hidden spiritual meaning (see Section xx). (For a discussion on the
relation between sensuous consciousness and anti-Semitism, see my article here:
www.newchurchissues.org/pre/lj03.htm
)
Heidegger's reductionism of reality to the being of
the natural, in time-space, has spawned many false notions around a
phenomenology of nonduality (see Section xx). This idea can be heard today on
television and read on the Web as the core of many "new age" movements of
spirituality. It is the idea that consciousness is Divine and that there is a
continuity between human and God, thanks to our ability to possess
consciousness. There is therefore a nonduality of substance between God and
human. According to this, we can attain our divinity, and become god, by
abandoning all human involvements as below us, and encompassing them in
ourselves, contemplating them from the stillness of non-state, above human
thinking. The good and the evil are not absolute, in this view of nonduality.
Their difference is illusory and belong to appearances of the lower
consciousness involved in striving to attain temporal goals and victories.
Clearly these notions are contrary to rational
spirituality from Sacred Scripture, which sees that all human life is made of
mental states, and no consciousness apart from mental state is possible or
meaningful. Also, that God has the highest consciousness, the perfect mental
states of good and rationality, of love and wisdom. God must be separate and
independent of human minds or anything that God has created. God must be outside
of creation to accomplish creation and run it to its pre-creation ends of love
and rationality (see Section xx). The human mind contains both evil and good,
since God manages us by giving us freedom to reject good and distort truth. when
we do this then we create a hell in our mental world. And this is permanent or
eternal. In our eternity, or immortality after resuscitation, we are organically
and physiologically compelled to separate the hellish and the heavenly traits,
loves, and thoughts. This means that we are compelled to give up one or the
other. If we give up the heavenly traits, we experience eternity in the hells of
our mind. If we give up the hellish traits, we experience eternity in the
heavens of our mind.
In order to examine some of the details of Husserl's
proposals on the reality of consciousness we need to consult a more elaborate
source, such as the Stanford Encylopedia of Philosophy entry on Husserl at:
plato.stanford.edu/entries/husserl/
"2. Pure logic, meaning, intuitive fulfillment and intentionality
As a philosophically-minded mathematician, Husserl was interested in
developing a general theory of inferential systems, which (following Bolzano)
he conceived of as a theory of science, on the ground that every science
(including mathematics) can be looked upon as a system of propositions that
are interconnected by a set of inferential relations. Following John S. Mill,
he argues in Logical Investigations that the best way to study the
nature of such propositional systems is to start with their linguistic
manifestations, i.e., (sets of) sentences and (assertive) utterances thereof.
How are we to analyse these sentences and the propositions they express?
Husserl's approach is to study the units of consciousness that the respective
speaker presents himself as having — that he “gives voice to” — in expressing
the proposition in question (for instance, while writing a mathematical
textbook or giving a lecture). These units of consciousness he labels
intentional acts or intentional experiences, since they always represent
something as something — thus exhibiting what Brentano called intentionality.
According to Husserl, there are non-intentional units of consciousness as
well. (He quotes pain as an example.) What distinguishes intentional from
non-intentional experiences is the former's having intentional content."
Husserl's insight was significant. Today we use the
expression interpretive discourse to refer to propositional accounts of
acts for accomplishing some task. Comprehensive discourse analysis (see
Section xx) identifies the smallest units in such self-witnessing descriptions.
When examined, these units belong to the three domains of operations of the mind
-- affective, cognitive, sensorimotor (see Section xx). These are the basis of
mental anatomy, spiritual geography, and the genes of
consciousness and human development (see Section xx). For an application of
this type of discourse analysis in information science research, and how
intentionality is defined, see this article by Diane Nahl:
www.itl.nist.gov/iaui/vvrg/hicss39/HICSS-2006-Nahl1.doc
Husserl spoke of the components of propositions as
"abstract atemporal objects," while ethnomethodologists today speak of them as
"social objects" (see Sacks, H. (1992). Lectures on conversation. 2 vols.
Edited by Gail Jefferson with introductions by Emanuel A. Schegloff. Oxford:
Basil Blackwell.) Much research is alive today on what are known as speech acts
(Searle, John. Speech acts. Cambridge, 1969). Husserl's dualism is that
between abstract objects like speech acts and logical propositions on the one
hand, and on the other, the verbal use of them by an individual to refer to or
index some particular unique subjective experience. This echoes Plato's dualism
between the eternal ideal original Form and the temporal gross copies of it in
nature or time. In theistic psychology we know that every natural object, form,
pattern, or quality is an effect in time-space of a cause that is outside time
and space (see Section xx). Natural objects such as a speech act or its
verbalization are effects caused by thoughts and feelings, which are rational
objects and events. All natural events and qualities are caused by rational
events and qualities. Husserl did not fully realize this. There is no evidence
that he was aware of the Writings of Swedenborg.
Another important notion developed by Husserl is
intersubjectivity. According to the Stanford Encyclopedia entry:
"7. Empathy, intersubjectivity and lifeworld
One of the main themes of transcendental phenomenology is
intersubjectivity. (...) (A particularly important critique of Husserl's view
on intersubjectivity from a sociological viewpoint is found in Schütz 1966.)
According to Husserl, intersubjective experience plays a fundamental role in
our constitution of both ourselves as objectively existing subjects, other
experiencing subjects, and the objective spatio-temporal world. Transcendental
phenomenology attempts to reconstruct the rational structures underlying — and
making possible — these constitutive achievements.
From a first-person point of view, intersubjectivity comes in when we
undergo acts of empathy. Intersubjective experience is empathic
experience; it occurs in the course of our conscious attribution of
intentional acts to other subjects, in the course of which we put ourselves
into the other one's shoes. In order to study this kind of experience from the
phenomenological attitude, we must bracket our belief in the existence of the
respective target of our act-ascription qua experiencing subject and ask
ourselves which of our further beliefs justify that existence-belief as well
as our act-ascription. It is these further beliefs that make up the rational
structure underlying our intersubjective experience. Since it takes
phenomenological investigation to lay bare these beliefs, they must be first
and foremost unconscious when we experience the world in the natural
attitude."
We can communicate with each other because we share the
same subjective feeling states. I can know what you are feeling now because I
can reconstruct how I feel when I am in your situation. And because of this, I
can say something about it that you can recognize as applicable to your
experience. Talking with each other is nothing but the alternating operation of
each of us taking turns to index for the other, the experiences we are having in
real time. Note that Husserl realized that there is a "rational structure
underlying our intersubjective experience." This rational structure is
unconscious, but can be uncovered by "phenomenological investigation." In 1957,
several decades after Husserl's death in 1938, sociologist Harold Garfinkel
published his book titled Studies in Ethnomethodology. (Englewood Cliffs,
NJ: Prentice Hall) which started a new field in sociology that came to be called
ethnomethodology. Garfinkel was influenced by Schutz who was influenced by
Husserl.
The purpose of ethnomethodology is to uncover and make explicit the "rational
structure underlying our intersubjective experience," just as the the purpose of
modern linguistics is to make explicit the rational or syntactic structure
(grammar) that generates our sentences and speech acts. People cannot ordinarily
explain how they put a sentence together, and if they try, their explanations
are not sufficient or accurate. Yet the sentences they produce are grammatical
and follow the syntactic rules of the language. Similarly, ethnomethodologists
are trying to uncover the rules of the ordinary that dictate the pattern
of our social activities. When we are walking in a shopping mall for instance,
we must accomplish the act of walking without bumping into other people. Every
pedestrian has a purpose and a destination, our paths crisscross each other, and
yet we manage to accomplish the task of getting there without colliding with
objects and one another. This practical accomplishment is achieved through each
of us following the social rules of walking that are specific to each locality
or condition. It is the same with how we manage to accomplish a day at work,
where we do ordinary things following the rules of what it is to be ordinary in
that social situation. The setting dictates the social practices, and the
individuals enact them by intentional acts that conform to the setting rules.
An important feature of ethnomethodology that is based on Husserl's idea of
intersubjectivity is that it is the doing of something that constitutes what it
is. This constitutive feature of human action gives rise to the approach
of constructionism, which in turn is related to interpretive discourse, as
discussed above. (An example of constructionism in discourse analysis is the
article by Diane Nahl mentioned earlier:
www.itl.nist.gov/iaui/vvrg/hicss39/HICSS-2006-Nahl1.doc This
feature of Husserl's approach may be seen from this passage in the Stanford
Encyclopedia article:
"Roughly, his argument goes as follows. In order for me to be able to put
myself into someone else's shoes and simulate his (or her) perspective upon
his surrounding spatio-temporal world, I cannot but assume that this world
coincides with my own, at least to a large extent; although the aspects under
which the other subject represents the world must be different, as they depend
on his own egocentric viewpoint. Hence, I must presuppose that the spatio-temporal
objects forming my own world exist independently of my subjective perspective
and the particular experiences I perform; they must, in other words, be
conceived of as part of an objective reality. This result fits in well with —
in fact, it serves to explain — Husserl's view, already stressed in Ideas,
that perceptual objects are “transcendent” in that at any given moment they
display an inexhaustive number of unperceived (and largely even unexpected)
features, only some of which will become manifest — will be intuitively
presented — in the further course of observation.
However, according to Husserl this does not mean that the objective world
thus constituted in intersubjective experience is to be regarded as completely
independent of the aspects under which we represent the world. For on his view
another condition for the possibility of intersubjective experience is
precisely the assumption that by and large the other subject structures the
world into objects in the same style I myself do. It is for this reason that
Husserl can be said to adhere to a version of both “realism” and “idealism” at
the same time."
As mentioned before, Alfred Schutz was an important
intermediary who modified Husserl's idea of intersubjectivity. According to the
Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy at
plato.stanford.edu/entries/schutz/
"Alfred Schutz, (1899-1959) more than any other phenomenologist, attempted
to relate the thought of Edmund Husserl to the social world and the social
sciences. His Phenomenology of the Social World supplied philosophical
foundations for Max Weber's sociology and for economics, with which he was
familiar through contacts with colleagues of the Austrian school. When Schutz
fled Hitler's Anschluss of Austria and immigrated to the United States in
1939, he developed his thought further in relationship to the social sciences,
American pragmatism, logical empiricism, and to various other fields of
endeavor such as music and literature. His work has been influential on new
movements in sociological thought such as ethnomethodology and conversation
analysis."
What people do with each other socially is the point of
doing them. It is in the doing that intersubjective meaning arises. The social
world of our daily reality consists of such constitutive acts of interaction,
coordinated by the joint actors to produce an outcome, which is the doing of
ordinary things that make up a day in the lives of people.
"In addition to this account of consciousness, motivation, and action, he
examined the structure of the social world, including Consociates who share
the same time and spatial access to each other's bodies, Contemporaries with
whom one shares only the same time, and Predecessors and Successors with whom
one does not share the same time and to whose lived bodies one lacks access.
Consociates, present to each other physically, partake of each other's inner
time, that is, the on-rolling life of the other, grasp the building up of the
other's experience, and live in a We-relationship that entails “growing older
together.” While Consociates revise their types of each other immediately, one
must proceed more inferentially with Contemporaries, Predecessors, and
Successors, constructing ideal types based on letters or reports and running
greater risks of misunderstanding, depending on the degree of anonymity of the
person to be understood. One could say, then, that Weber's method of ideal
type construction, illustrated in his sociological account of the Protestant
at the origins of capitalism, is not really that foreign to the everyday
life-world in which actors beyond the Consociate level continually relate to
each other via such type construction. Human actors in everyday life already
adopt toward each other the attitudes of social scientists.
Schutz conceived his work as developing a “phenomenological psychology” of
“inner experience” and focusing on the invariant features of the life-world
toward which theoreticians, including social scientists, turn reflectively.
Although Jürgen Habermas criticizes Schutz's account of the life-world for
being “abridged in a culturalistic fashion” and not addressing institutional
orders and personality structures (Habermas 1987, 2:126-132), it would seem
that Schutz himself delimits his own work in just this fashion. According to
him, social scientists develop constructs, ideal types, of the
meaning-contexts of life-world actors, and they test these types to determine
if they are causally adequate, that is conforming to past experience, and
meaning adequate, that is, consistent with whatever else is known about the
actor."
An important focus for Schutz was the attempt to
reconstruct how we make decisions in our moment to moment transactions with
others in our daily routines. A classic issue about introspection has been the
philosophical difficulty of explaining how we can observe what is above the
level of our thinking, thus the level of rational syntax that allows us to
maintain coherent and logical thought sequences about real objects in time and
space. Consider this description from the Stanford Encyclopedia entry. The first
paragraph shows once more Schutz's dualism and his consequent opposition to
positivism, which wants to "reduce experience to what the method of
natural scientific observation found tolerable," such as the idea that sensing,
feeling, and thinking are nothing more than the physical measurable brain
neurons:
"Schutz's manuscripts on Bergson, produced from 1925 to 1927 and finally
published in English in 1982, illuminate his subsequent works, with which they
share the general purpose of “the grounding of the social sciences in the Thou
experience.” (Schutz 1982, 34) In reaction to positivistic approaches of the
Schlick Circle (in which Felix Kaufmann participated) that reduced experience
to what the method of natural scientific observation found tolerable, Schutz
sought to give an account of the life-form of pre-scientific experience
preceding conceptual-categorical comprehension, the “highest and most powerful
life-form.” (Schutz 1982, 53)
Of course, by moving in this direction, he encountered the problem, faced
by Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel, Wilfrid Sellars, John McDowell, Robert
Brandom, and others, namely, how it is possible to access the pre-conceptual
without conceptualizing it. Hence, he acknowledged that his work is “in
conflict with its material” since it “is forced to resort to conceptual
formulations.” (Schutz 1982, 70)
This problem parallels the problem of reaching the life-form of the present
unfolding of experience (duration) since one can only speak of it by arresting
its flow, distinguishing its moments, and thus remembering what has lapsed --
but then one is in the new life-form of memory.
Although this gap between present duration and memory prompted his turn to
Husserlian phenomenology, the problematic itself highlighted for him the
pervasiveness and hiddenness of interpretive activity as one moves between
interpretive frameworks -- a principal theme of all his later work. He took
notice of this theme when he frequently pointed out how one's reconstitution
of a past experience in memory varied according to the interests of the
present from which one remembered the past."
This problem is known in the history of psychology in the work of Franz
Brentano (1838-1917) who is credited for introducing the notion of
intentionality into contemporary philosophy. See the Stanford Encyclopedia
entry on him at
plato.stanford.edu/entries/brentano/
He is "often considered a forerunner of both the phenomenological movement and
the tradition of analytic philosophy" and he "exerted a strong influence on the
work of Edmund Husserl" among others. Brentano argued that philosophy and
psychology can be empirical sciences only if mental phenomena are observed
directly as data. This means introspection, reflection, self-witnessing. Being a
witness to one's mental operations is the only direct access that psychology has
to its phenomena. According to the entry:
"All mental phenomena have in common, Brentano argues, “that they are only
perceived in inner consciousness, while in the case of physical phenomena only
external perception is possible” (Psychology, 91). According to Brentano, the
former of these two forms of perception provides an unmistakable evidence for
what is true. Since the German word for perception (Wahrnehmung ) means
literally translated “taking-true,” Brentano says that it is the only kind of
perception in a strict sense. He points out that inner perception must not be
mixed up with inner observation, i.e., it must not be conceived as a
full-fledged act that accompanies another mental act towards which it is
directed. It is rather interwoven with the latter: in addition to being
primarily directed towards an object, each act is incidentally directed
towards itself as a secondary object.
As a consequence, Brentano denies the idea that there could be unconscious
mental acts: since every mental act is incidentally directed towards itself as
a secondary object, we are automatically aware of every occurring mental act.
He admits, however, that we can have mental acts of various degrees of
intensity. In addition, he holds that the degree of intensity with which the
object is presented is equal to the degree of intensity in which the secondary
object, i.e., the act itself, is presented. Consequently, if we have a mental
act of a very low intensity, also our secondary consciousness of this act will
have a very low intensity. From this Brentano concludes that sometimes we are
inclined to say that we had an unconscious mental phenomenon when actually we
only had a conscious mental phenomenon of very low intensity."
Brentano's dualism is referred to here as follows:
"Brentano's goal, as we have seen above, was to deliver a further criterion
to distinguish mental from physical phenomena, and not to develop a systematic
account of intentionality. The passage clearly suggests, however, that the
intentional object towards which we are directed is part of the psychological
act. It is something mental rather than physical. Brentano, thus, seems
to advocate a form of immanentism, according to which the intentional object
is “in the head,” as it were."
In other words mental acts are not continuous with the physical world in
time-space. When we have an intention, the act is not in this world, but it must
somehow be communicated to the physical act of the body, or else we would not
have voluntary movement. Brentano correctly theorized that "mental acts cannot
have duration." There is no evidence that Brentano knew of the Writings of
Swedenborg.
My own solution to the inherent paradox of self-witnessing one's own thinking
is presented in this article, written prior to my acquaintance with the Writings
of Swedenborg and theistic psychology:
Leon James. (1974). Radicalist empiricism: The Universal Modes of Enactment
in Human Experience . A Self-Witnessing Account of the Discovery of Sudden
Memory and My Interpretation of Its Significance for the Human Race. Available
at:
www.soc.hawaii.edu/leonj/499ss99/man/enactment.html
See also: The Hexagram of Sudden Memory at
www.soc.hawaii.edu/leonj/updates/lee/section8.1.2.html
1.6.9.4
Dualism in Descartes and Swedenborg
This discussion is based on Dr. Ian Thompson's article at:
www.newdualism.org/papers/I.Thompson/dualism-descartes-swedenborg.htm
First, quoting from the Writings Sacred Scripture regarding Descartes:
ISB 19. To these things I will add this Relation.
After these things were written, I prayed to the Lord that I might be
permitted to converse with disciples of Aristotle, and at the same time with
disciples of Descartes, and with disciples of Leibnitz, in order that I might
draw forth the opinions of their minds concerning the interaction between the
soul and the body.
After my prayer, there were present nine men, three Aristotelians, three
Cartesians, and three Leibnitzians; and they stood around me, the admirers of
Aristotle on the left side, the followers of Descartes on the right, and the
supporters of Leibnitz behind. Quite a distance away, and at intervals from
each other, were seen three persons as it were crowned with laurel, and I knew
from an inflowing perception that they were those three great leaders or
teachers themselves. Behind Leibnitz stood one holding in his hand the skirt
of his garment, and I was told that it was Wolff**. Those nine men, when they
beheld one another, at first saluted and spoke to one another in a courteous
tone.
[2] But presently there arose from below a spirit with a torch in his right
hand, which he shook before their faces, whereupon they became enemies, three
against three, and looked at one another with a fierce countenance; for they
were seized with the lust of disputing and discussing.
Then the Aristotelians, who were also scholastics, began to speak, saying,
Who does not see that objects flow in through the senses into the soul, as one
enters through the doors into a chamber, and that the soul thinks according to
such influx? When a lover sees a beautiful virgin or his bride, does not his
eye sparkle and carry the love of her into the soul? When a miser sees bags of
money, does he not burn for them with every sense, and thence convey this
order into the soul, and excite the cupidity of possessing them? When a proud
man hears his praises from another, does he not prick up his ears, and do not
these transmit those praises to the soul? Are not the senses of the body like
outer courts, through which alone there is entrance to the soul? From these
things and innumerable others like them, who can conclude otherwise than that
influx is from nature, or is physical?
[3] To these statements the followers of Descartes, who had held their
fingers on their foreheads, and now withdrew them, replied, saying, Alas, you
speak from appearances. Do you not know that the eye does not love a virgin or
a bride from itself, but from the soul? Likewise that the senses of the body
do not covet the bags of money from themselves, but from the soul? and
similarly that the ears do not seize on the praises of flatterers in any other
manner? Is it not perception that causes sensation? and perception is of the
soul, and not of the organs. Tell, if you can, what else makes the tongue and
lips to speak but the thought? and what else makes the hands to work but the
will? and thought and will are of the soul, and not of the body. Thus what
makes the eye to see, and the ears to hear, and the other organs to feel, but
the soul? From these things, and innumerable others like them, everyone whose
wisdom is above the sensual things of the body, concludes, that there is no
influx of the body into the soul, but of the soul into the body, which we call
occasional, and also spiritual influx.
[4] When these had been heard, the three men who stood behind the former
triads, who were the supporters of Leibnitz, lifted up their voices, saying,
We have heard the arguments on both sides, and have compared them, and we have
perceived that in many particulars the latter are stronger than the former,
and that in many others the former are stronger than the latter; wherefore if
it is permitted, we will settle the dispute. And on being asked how, they
said, There is not any influx of the soul into the body, nor of the body into
the soul, but there is a unanimous and instantaneous operation of both
together, which a celebrated author has distinguished by a beautiful name,
calling it preestablished harmony.
[5] Hereupon there appeared again the spirit with the torch in his hand,
but now in his left, and he shook it at the back of their heads, whence their
ideas of everything became confused and they cried out together, Neither our
soul nor body knows what part to take, wherefore let us decide this dispute by
lot, and we will favor the lot which comes out first. And they took three
pieces of paper, and wrote on one of them, physical influx, on another
spiritual influx, and on the third, preestablished harmony; and they put these
three pieces into a hat. Then they chose one of their number to draw, and he,
putting in his hand, took hold of that on which was written spiritual influx;
and when this was seen and read, they all said, yet some with a clear and
flowing, some with a faint and smothered voice, Let us favor this because it
came out first.
[6] But then an angel suddenly stood by, and said, Do not believe that the
paper in favor of spiritual influx came out by chance, but from providence;
for you do not see its truth because you are in confused ideas, but the truth
itself presented itself to the hand of him that drew the lots, that you might
favor it. (** Christian Wolff (1679-1754), a follower of Leibnitz.) (ISB
19) (see also TCR 696)
This historical encounter between Swedenborg and the three famous
philosophers that preceded him, is most interesting and unusual. No previous
scholar to Swedenborg was able to obtain directly from the original authors,
what they were actually thinking about dualism and influx. Here we see the
positions of Aristotle, Descartes, and Leibniz contrasted and compared in their
essentials. There is no physical influx from the sensory organs and brain
into the mental organs of the mind, as Aristotle believes. Neither is there is a
preestablished harmony between the physical sensory organs or brain and the
mental organs of the mind, as Leibniz believes. Descartes is correct in stating
that there is spiritual influx from the mind into the body, as for
instance, when he says that perception in the mind must precede sensation in the
physical organs. Without a prior mental intention or preparedness in perceiving
the physical object, there would be no physical ensation in the body.
However, the notion that Descartes had of the soul is not accurate:
INV 13. That at the present day nothing is known concerning the union of
soul and body, is proved by the hypotheses of the learned concerning the soul;
especially by that of Descartes and others, [who maintain] that the soul is a
substance separated from the body, in some place or other;
|